1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass{aastex}
6: %\documentclass[preprint2,twoside]{aastex}
7: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
8: %\documentclass{aastex}
9:
10:
11: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
12: \usepackage{graphics}
13: \usepackage{psfig}
14:
15: \def\93j{{SN~1993J}}
16: \def\R{{\sl ROSAT}}
17: \def\X{{\sl XMM-Newton}}
18: \def\A{{\sl ASCA}}
19: \def\C{{\sl Chandra}}
20: \def\B{{\sl BeppoSax}}
21: \newcommand\hii{H{\small II}}
22: \newcommand\hi{H{\small I}}
23: \def\cor{\widehat=}
24: \def\gs{\mathrel{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil
25: $\displaystyle##$\hfil\cr>\cr\sim\cr}}}
26: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\textstyle##$\hfil\cr
27: >\cr\sim\cr}}}
28: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
29: >\cr\sim\cr}}}
30: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptscriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
31: >\cr\sim\cr}}}}}
32: \def\ls{\mathrel{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil
33: $\displaystyle##$\hfil\cr<\cr\sim\cr}}}
34: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\textstyle##$\hfil\cr
35: <\cr\sim\cr}}}
36: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
37: <\cr\sim\cr}}}
38: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptscriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
39: <\cr\sim\cr}}}}}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: \title{X-ray Emission from the Type Ic Supernova 1994I
44: Observed with {\sl Chandra}}
45:
46: \author{Stefan Immler}
47: \affil{Astronomy Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003}
48: \author{Andrew S. Wilson \& Yuichi Terashima\altaffilmark{1}}
49: \affil{Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742}
50: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai,
51: Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
52:
53: \shorttitle{X-ray emission from the Type Ic SN~1994I}
54: \shortauthors{Immler, Wilson \& Terashima}
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: We present two high-resolution \C\ X-ray observations of supernova (SN) 1994I
58: which show, for the first time, that the interaction of the blast wave from a Type Ic
59: SN with its surrounding circumstellar material (CSM) can give rise to soft X-ray
60: emission. Given a 0.3--2~keV band
61: X-ray luminosity of $L_{\rm x}\sim1\times10^{37}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$ between six and
62: seven years after the outburst of SN~1994I, and assuming the X-ray emission arises
63: from the shock-heated CSM, we derive a pre-SN mass-loss rate of
64: $\dot{M}\sim1\times10^{-5}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$.
65: Combining the results with earlier \R\ observations, we construct the X-ray lightcurve
66: of SN~1994I. A best-fit X-ray rate of decline of $L_{\rm x} \propto t^{-s}$ with
67: index $s\sim1$ and a CSM density profile of $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.9\pm0.1}$
68: are inferred, consistent with what is expected for a constant mass-loss rate and
69: constant wind velocity profile for the SN progenitor ($\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-2}$).
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \keywords{supernovae: individual (SN 1994I) --- stars: mass loss ---
73: X-rays: individual (SN 1994I) --- X-rays: ISM}
74:
75: \section{Introduction}
76: \label{introduction}
77:
78: The classification scheme for SNe is based on the presence or absence of
79: hydrogen lines in their optical spectra (Type II and Type I, respectively). While Type
80: II/Ib SNe occur during the core collapse of a massive star, Type Ia SNe are believed to
81: originate from the deflagration or detonation of an accreting white dwarf star in a binary
82: system. The massive ($>10 M_{\odot}$) progenitor stars for the controversial Type Ic SN
83: subclass are thought to have lost their outer hydrogen and helium layers either through
84: stellar winds or by mass transfer to a companion, leaving behind a stripped carbon and
85: oxygen (C+O) star. Such a `naked' C+O star will later explode when its iron core
86: collapses (e.g. Nomoto et al. 1994).
87: The interaction of the outgoing SN shock wave with the ambient CSM,
88: deposited either by a pre-SN stellar wind or non-conservative mass transfer to a
89: companion, produces hot gas with characteristic temperatures in the range
90: $T \sim 10^7$--$10^9$~K (Chevalier \& Fransson 1994).
91: Gas heated to such high temperatures produces radiation predominantly in the X-ray
92: range. X-ray emission from this interaction is expected for all Type Ib/c and II SNe with
93: substantial CSM established by the massive progenitors. Over the last 20 years, searches
94: for X-ray emitting SNe have been successful for only a relatively small number of Type
95: II's in the near aftermath (days to months) of the explosion (see Immler \& Lewin 2002
96: for a review article)\footnote{A complete list of
97: X-ray SNe is available at http://xray.astro.umass.edu/sne.html}.
98:
99: By contrast, no Type Ia or Ib/c SN has ever been firmly detected in X-rays,
100: apart from a $3.5\sigma$ excess in an \X\ EPIC-PN image $4''$ offset from the optical
101: position of the Ic SN~2002ap (Rodriguez-Pascual et al. 2002). Hard (2--10~keV band) X-ray
102: emission was recorded with \B\ from the position of the unusual SN 1998bw, which might
103: be associated with a $\gamma$-ray burst event (GRB 980425; Galama et al. 1998,
104: Pian et al. 1998). Due to the large error box of the \B\ Wide Field Camera observation
105: (between $3'$ and $8'$, $99\%$ confidence limit) and the rather large probability of
106: $\sim60\%$ that the source is a random chance coincidence, the association of the
107: X-ray source with SN 1998bw and GRB~980425 is still tentative (Galama et al. 1998).
108:
109: Evidence for soft (0.1--2.4~keV band) X-ray emission has been reported from
110: the Type Ic SN~1994I, based on \R\ HRI observations 82 days after the
111: outburst (Immler, Pietsch \& Aschenbach 1998).
112: However, the \R\ observations, with a spatial resolution of $\sim5''$ (FWHM
113: on-axis), were not conclusive since SN~1994I is located close to the X-ray bright nucleus
114: of the host galaxy M51 (distance $\sim18''$) and is embedded in a high level of extended
115: X-ray emission from hot gas and unresolved point-like X-ray sources in the bulge of M51.
116:
117: \section{X-Ray Observations and Analysis}
118: \label{obs}
119: We used the \C\ X-ray observatory to search for X-ray emission from SN
120: 1994I in X-ray images taken between six (June 6, 2000) and seven years (June 23, 2001)
121: after the explosion (March 31, 1994; Chandler, Phillips \& Rupen 1994).
122: Our 14.9~ks and 26.8~ks \C\ observations
123: were carried out with the S3 chip of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-S)
124: at the focal plane of the telescope and the nucleus of the host galaxy M51 placed
125: at the aim-point (Terashima \& Wilson 2001).
126: The superb spatial resolution ($0\farcs5$ FWHM on-axis), together with the
127: high sensitivity of the instrument and the long combined exposure (41.7~ks), allows us to
128: separate point-like sources from the diffuse emission in the bulge of M51 and to carry
129: out a sensitive search for X-ray emission from SN~1994I. The co-added and adaptively
130: smoothed \C\ image of the central region of M51 is presented in Fig.~1.
131:
132: An X-ray source is detected at the position of SN~1994I in the merged \C\ data with
133: a significance of $\sim6\sigma$ in the 0.3--2~keV band using the `wave detect' algorithm
134: implemented in the {\sc ciao} data analysis package. The position of the X-ray source
135: (${\rm R.A., Dec.} (2000) = 13^{\rm h} 29^{\rm m} 54\fs17, +47\degr 11' 30\farcs2$)
136: is fully consistent with the radio position of the SN ($\sim0\farcs5$ offset;
137: Rupen et al. 1994). Astrometry of the M51 nucleus shows a similarly small offset
138: between the (2--8~keV band) X-ray and radio positions ($\sim0\farcs3$). Exposure corrected
139: source counts were extracted within a radius of 3 image pixels (90\% encircled energy
140: radius at 1~keV) and corrected for the background taken in an annulus with inner and
141: outer radii of 3.5 and 9.5 pixels, respectively (1 pixel corresponds to $0\farcs49$).
142:
143: A spectral model has to be assumed to convert source counts into energy fluxes.
144: We adopted an effective (0.3--2~keV band) cooling function of
145: $\Lambda = 3 \times 10^{-23}~{\rm ergs~cm}^3~{\rm s}^{-1}$
146: for an optically thin Raymond-Smith thermal plasma with a temperature of
147: $10^7$~K (Raymond, Cox \& Smith 1976). Although the temperature is unknown, this
148: value is consistent with theoretical expectations (Chevalier \& Fransson 1994),
149: previous X-ray observations of other SNe and the detection
150: of SN~1994I in the soft (0.3--2~keV) X-ray band where the peak of a $10^7$~K
151: spectrum is located. The equivalent count rate to (unabsorbed) flux conversion factors
152: are then $4\times10^{-11}~({\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1})/({\rm counts~s}^{-1})$
153: and $3\times10^{-12}~({\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1})/({\rm counts~s}^{-1})$
154: for the \R\ HRI and \C\ ACIS-S3, respectively, and a Galactic foreground column
155: density of $N_{\rm H} = 1.3\times10^{20}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$ (Dickey \& Lockman 1990).
156: The uncertainty of the conversion factors for optically thin thermal spectra with
157: temperatures in the range $10^7$--$10^9$~K is $\sim15\%$. Assuming a 0.86~keV thermal
158: bremsstrahlung spectrum (corresponding to a temperature of $10^7$~K) instead of a
159: Raymond-Smith thermal plasma increases the conversion factor by $\sim7\%$.
160: The \C\ results for the two individual observations of SN~1994I, together with
161: previous \R\ HRI results (Immler, Pietsch \& Aschenbach 1998), are summarized in Table~1.
162:
163: \section{Discussion}
164: \label{discussion}
165:
166: We used the \C\ and \R\ data to construct a combined X-ray lightcurve
167: of SN~1994I, which is presented in Fig.~2. A best-fit single power-law rate
168: of decline of $f_{\rm x} \propto t^{-s}$ with index $s=0.9^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$
169: (solid line, Fig.~\ref{f2}) is inferred for the measurements on days 82, 2,271 and
170: 2,639. Assuming an initial exponential rise of the X-ray luminosity after the
171: outburst (at time $t_0$) of SN~1994I and a subsequent power-law decline with
172: index $s$, we also parameterized the X-ray evolution as
173: $f_{\rm x} \propto (t-t_0)^{-s} \times e^{-\tau}$ with $\tau \propto (t-t_0)^{-\beta}$.
174: This model has been successfully used to describe the time dependence of the
175: radio emission of SNe (Weiler et al. 1996).
176: The external absorption of the emission is represented by the $e^{-\tau}$
177: term (`optical depth') and the time-dependence of the optical depth is parameterized
178: by the exponent $\beta$. In the X-ray regime, the rise could represent either
179: decreasing absorption by material along the line of sight to the hot gas or
180: simply non-production of X-rays in the \R\ band at early times.
181: If we adopt this strictly heuristic description, we find $s\sim1$ and $\beta\sim2$
182: (dashed line, Fig.~\ref{f2}). In case the \R\ detection on day 82 corresponds to a
183: pre-maximum measurement, a steeper index of $s\sim1.5$ is inferred
184: (dotted line, Fig.~\ref{f2}). However, given the large error range of the flux
185: measurements, $s$ and $\beta$ are not very well constrained.
186: % Both models with $s\sim1$ and $1.5$ are not in conflict with the \R\ upper limits on day 52.
187:
188: While a $t^{-1}$ rate of decline has been observed for the Type IIb SN~1999em with
189: \C\ (Pooley et al. 2002), faster rates of decline have been reported for the Ic SN 1998bw
190: ($s=1.4$), inferred from the tentative hard (2--10~keV) band \B\ data (Pian et al. 1999),
191: the Ic radio SN~1990B ($s=1.3$) and the Ib radio SNe 1983N ($s=1.6$) and 1984L
192: ($s=1.5$; Van Dyk et al. 1993). By contrast, the long-term X-ray lightcurve
193: of the IIb SN~1993J is best described by a slow rate of decline with $s=0.27$
194: (Immler, Aschenbach \& Wang 2001).
195:
196: The X-ray emitting material could be either shocked SN ejecta (reverse shock) or
197: shocked CSM (forward shock; Chevalier \& Fransson 1994). The lack of
198: time-dependent X-ray spectroscopy precludes a distinction but, as we shall see,
199: the X-ray lightcurve is consistent with the latter model with a constant
200: pre-SN mass loss rate ($\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-2}$). Alternatively, the CSM
201: might result from a non-conservative mass-transfer to the companion star, leading to the
202: formation of a flattened or disk-like H and He-rich shell (Nomoto et al. 1994).
203: In this case a CSM profile flatter than $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-2}$ is expected
204: due to the non-spherically symmetric geometry of the mass-transfer.
205:
206: In the stellar wind scenario the continuum equation requires a mass-loss rate of
207: $\dot{M} = 4\pi r^2 \rho_{\rm w}(r) \times v_{\rm w}(r)$
208: through a sphere of radius $r$. After the SN shock plows through the CSM, its density
209: is $\rho_{\rm csm} = 4\rho_{\rm w}$ (Fransson, Lundqvist \& Chevalier 1996).
210: The X-ray luminosity of the shock-heated CSM is
211: $L_{\rm x} = \Lambda(T) {\rm d}V n^2$, where d$V$ is the volume,
212: $n = \rho_{\rm csm}/m$ is the number density of the shocked CSM and $m$ is the
213: mean mass per particle ($2.1\times10^{-27}$~kg for a H+He plasma).
214: We thus obtain
215: $L_{\rm x} = 4/(\pi m^2) \Lambda(T) \times (\dot{M}/v_{\rm w})^2\times(v_{\rm s} t)^{-1}$.
216: The observed X-ray rate of decline ($t^{-1}$) is consistent with this description
217: if $\Lambda(T)$, $\dot{M}/v_{\rm w}$ and $v_{\rm s}$ are constant.
218: We can hence use the observed X-ray luminosity at time $t$ after the outburst to measure
219: the ratio $\dot{M}/v_{\rm w}$ assuming a constant shell expansion velocity $v_{\rm s}$.
220: Given our observed X-ray luminosities (Table~1) and assuming a shell expansion velocity of
221: $v_{\rm s} = 16,500~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$ (Filippenko et al. 1995) we derive a mass-loss rate
222: of $\dot{M}\sim1\times10^{-5} M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$
223: consistent with all three detections and the \R\ upper limit on day 1,368.
224: %% NEW:
225:
226: It should be noted, however, that a single power-law model can only be
227: reconciled with the data obtained on days 82--2,639, but not with the
228: early \R\ upper limit on day 52 (see Fig.~2). This is indicative that
229: the above model might be incomplete for early epochs. The addition of an
230: exponential term describing the rise during the early phase of the emission
231: leads to a fit that is in agreement with all measurements in case the
232: \R\ detection on day 82 was a post-maximum measurement ($s\sim1$).
233: By contrast, the model with a steeper rate of decline ($s\sim1.5$),
234: which postulates that the early \R\ detection corresponds to a
235: pre-maximum measurement, is in conflict with a $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-2}$
236: profile.
237:
238: Table~1 summarizes the CSM number density $n$ for the different radii
239: $r = v_{\rm s} \times t$ corresponding to the dates of the observations.
240: As was already claimed based on the early \R\ data (Immler, Pietsch \&
241: Aschenbach 1998), the $3\sigma$ upper limit for the CSM density at
242: $r = 2.0\times10^{17}~{\rm cm}$ (day 1,368) is lower than that at
243: $1.2\times10^{16}~{\rm cm}$ (day 82). Our \C\ results at $3.2$ and
244: $3.8\times10^{17}~{\rm cm}$ (days 2,271 and 2,639, respectively)
245: clearly support these early indications for a decreasing CSM density
246: profile (see Table~1). The combined \R\ and \C\ data of SN 1994I give
247: a best-fit profile of $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.9\pm0.1}$.
248:
249: The only SN for which a CSM density profile has been constructed from X-ray
250: measurements is SN~1993J (Type IIb with a progenitor of $\sim15 M_{\odot}$),
251: based on long-term monitoring with \R\
252: between six days and five years after the outburst (Immler, Aschenbach \& Wang 2001).
253: A comparison between the CSM
254: profiles of the two SNe is presented in Fig.~3. Although the CSM density profile of
255: SN~1993J is significantly flatter ($\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.6}$)
256: than that of SN~1994I, the two SNe have a similar CSM number density of
257: $\sim10^{6.5}~{\rm cm}^{-3}$ at a radius of $r\sim5\times10^{15}~{\rm cm}$ from the
258: site of the explosion (cf. Fig.~3).
259:
260: Given that both the X-ray rate of decline ($L_{\rm x} \propto t^{-1}$) and
261: the CSM profile ($\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.9\pm0.1}$) of SN~1994I are
262: not in conflict with what is expected for a constant stellar wind speed and
263: a constant mass-loss rate of the progenitor ($L_{\rm x} \propto t^{-1}$,
264: $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-2}$), it is likely that the stellar wind of the massive
265: progenitor dominates the CSM.
266:
267: \acknowledgments
268:
269: We thank Roger Chevalier for helpful discussion and the referee (Bernd Aschenbach)
270: for his comments that led to significant improvement of the manuscript.
271: This research was supported by NASA grants NAG~5-8999 to the University
272: of Massachusetts and NAG~81755 to the University of Maryland.
273: Y.T. is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
274: Postdoctoral Fellowship for Young Scientists.
275:
276: \begin{thebibliography}{}
277:
278: \bibitem[1994]{chandler94}Chandler, C.J., Phillips, J. A., \& Rupen, M. P.
279: 1994, IAU Circ., No. 5978
280: \bibitem[1994]{chefra94}Chevalier, R.A., \& Fransson, C.
281: 1994, \apj, 420, 268
282: \bibitem[1990]{dickey90}Dickey, J.M., \& Lockman, F.J.
283: 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
284: \bibitem[1997]{feldmeier97}Feldmeier, J.J., Ciardullo, R., \& Jacoby, G.H.
285: 1997, \apj, 479, 231
286: \bibitem[1995]{fili95}Filippenko, A.V., et al.
287: 1995, \apj, 450, L11
288: \bibitem[1996]{fransson96}Fransson, C., Lundqvist, P., \& Chevalier, R.A.
289: 1996, \apj, 461, 993
290: \bibitem[1998]{galama98}Galama, T.J., et al.
291: 1998, \nat, 395, 670
292: \bibitem[1998]{immler98}Immler, S., Pietsch, W., \& Aschenbach, B.
293: 1998, A\&A, 336, L1
294: \bibitem[2001]{immler01}Immler, S., Aschenbach, B., \& Wang, Q.D.
295: 2001, \apj, 561, L107
296: \bibitem[2002]{immler02}Immler, S., \& Lewin, H.G.
297: 2002, in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. K. W. Weiler
298: (Springer Publisher), astro-ph/0202231
299: \bibitem[1994]{nomoto94}Nomoto, K., et al.
300: 1994, \nat, 371, 227
301: \bibitem[1999]{pian99}Pian, E., et al.
302: 1999, A\&AS, 138, 463
303: \bibitem{2002}Pooley, D., et al. 2002,
304: ApJ in press, astro-ph/0103196
305: \bibitem[1976]{raymond76}Raymond, J.C., Cox, D.P., \& Smith, B.W.
306: 1976, \apj, 204, 290
307: \bibitem[2002]{pascual02}Rodriguez-Pascual, P.M., et al.
308: 2002, IAU Circ., No. 7821
309: \bibitem[1994]{rupen94}Rupen, M.P., et al.
310: 1994, IAU Circ., No. 5963
311: \bibitem[2001]{terashima01}Terashima, Y., \& Wilson, A. S.
312: 2001, \apj, 560, 139
313: \bibitem[1993]{vandyk93}Van Dyk, S., Sramek, R.A., Weiler, K.W., \& Panagia, N.
314: 1993, \apj, 419, 162
315: \bibitem[1986]{weiler91b}Weiler, K.W., et al.
316: 1986, \apj, 301, 790
317:
318: \end{thebibliography}
319:
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321: %% Table 1:
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323:
324: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
325: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
326: \tablecaption{X-ray Properties of SN~1994I \label{tab}}
327: \tablewidth{0pt}
328: \tablehead{
329: \colhead{\phantom{0}Day$~^{\rm (a)}$} &
330: \colhead{Instrument} &
331: \colhead{Count Rate} &
332: \colhead{$f_{\rm x}~^{\rm (b)}$} &
333: \colhead{$L_{\rm x}~^{\rm (c)}$} &
334: \colhead{$\dot{M}~^{\rm (d)}$} &
335: \colhead{log$~n^{\rm (e)}$} \\
336: & &
337: \colhead{($10^{-4}~{\rm cts~s}^{-1}$)} &
338: \colhead{($10^{-15}$)} &
339: \colhead{($10^{37}$)} &
340: \colhead{($10^{-5}$)} &
341: \colhead{(${\rm cm}^{-3}$)}}
342: \startdata
343: \phantom{0}\phantom{0}\,52 &
344: \R\ HRI &
345: $<3.1$ &
346: $<12.9$ &
347: $<10.9$ &
348: $<0.5$ &
349: $<5.9$ \\
350: \phantom{0}\phantom{0}\,82 &
351: \R\ HRI &
352: $5.2\pm1.7$ &
353: $21.6\pm5.0$ &
354: $18.2\pm4.2$ &
355: $0.7\pm0.4$ &
356: \phantom{0}\phantom{0}$5.7$ \\
357: 1,368 &
358: \R\ HRI &
359: $<8.4$ &
360: $<34.8$ &
361: $<29.4$ &
362: $<3.8$ &
363: $<4.0$ \\
364: $2,271$ &
365: \C\ ACIS-S &
366: $5.5\pm2.2$ &
367: $1.7\pm0.7$ &
368: $1.4\pm0.5$ &
369: $1.1\pm0.7$ &
370: \phantom{0}\phantom{0}$3.0$ \\
371: 2,639 &
372: \C\ ACIS-S &
373: $4.6\pm1.6$ &
374: $1.4\pm0.5$ &
375: $1.2\pm0.4$ &
376: $1.1\pm0.7$ &
377: \phantom{0}\phantom{0}$2.9$
378: \enddata
379: \tablenotetext{(a)}{\phantom{0}day after the outburst of SN~1994I
380: (March 31, 1994; Chandler, Phillips \& Rupen 1994)}
381: \tablenotetext{(b)}{\phantom{0}0.3--2~keV band flux in units of
382: $10^{-15}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$ for a $10^7$~K thermal plasma
383: spectrum and a Galactic foreground column density of
384: $N_{\rm H} = 1.3 \times 10^{20}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$ (Dickey \& Lockman 1990)}
385: \tablenotetext{(c)}{\phantom{0}0.3--2~keV band luminosity in units of
386: $10^{37}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$ for an assumed distance of $d = 8.4~{\rm Mpc}$
387: (Feldmeier, Ciardullo \& Jacoby 1997)}
388: \tablenotetext{(d)}{\phantom{0}pre-SN mass-loss rate in units of
389: $10^{-5}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$}
390: \tablenotetext{(e)}{\phantom{0}post-shock CSM number density}
391: \end{deluxetable}
392: \vfill
393:
394: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
395: %% if Figures are included:
396: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
397:
398: \begin{figure}[t!]
399: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
400: \psfig{figure=f1.ps,width=9cm,angle=270,clip=}
401: \hfil\hfil} }
402: \caption{\C\ ACIS-S soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray image of the central
403: region of M51. The image was adaptively smoothed to achieve a signal-to-noise
404: ratio in the range 3--5 and is plotted in logarithmic greyscale.
405: The position of SN~1994I is marked by a box and the nucleus of M51 is at the center
406: of the image.
407: \label{f1}}
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: \begin{figure}[t!]
411: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
412: \psfig{figure=f2.ps,width=11cm,clip=}
413: \hfil\hfil}}
414: \caption{Soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray lightcurve of SN~1994I.
415: The \C\ detections are marked by filled boxes, open boxes indicate the
416: early \R\ HRI detection and $3\sigma$ upper limits.
417: Error bars are $\pm1\sigma$ statistical errors.
418: Time is given in days after the outburst.
419: The solid line represents a power-law fit to the
420: detections at days 82, 2,271 and 2,639. The dashed and dotted lines
421: represent models including an $e^{-\tau}$ term (see Section~3).
422: \label{f2}}
423: \end{figure}
424:
425: \begin{figure}[t!]
426: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
427: \psfig{figure=f3.ps,width=11cm,clip=}
428: \hfil\hfil} }
429: \caption{Circumstellar matter density profile as a function of SN shell
430: expansion radius. The solid line gives the best-fit CSM density profile of
431: $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.9}$ for the \R\ (open boxes) and \C\ (filled boxes)
432: measurements of SN~1994I.
433: The CSM density profile with $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.6}$
434: based on \R\ observations of SN~1993J is drawn for comparison (dashed line and
435: open triangles; Immler, Aschenbach \& Wang 2001).
436: \label{f3}}
437: \end{figure}
438:
439: \vfill
440:
441: \end{document}
442:
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
444: %% Figure captions only:
445: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
446:
447: \clearpage
448:
449: \figcaption[f1.ps]
450: {\C\ ACIS-S soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray image of the central
451: region of M51. The image was adaptively smoothed to achieve a signal-to-noise
452: ratio in the range 3--5 and is plotted in logarithmic greyscale.
453: The position of SN~1994I is marked by a box and the nucleus of M51 is at the center
454: of the image.
455: \label{f1}}
456:
457: \figcaption[f2.ps]
458: {Soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray lightcurve of SN~1994I.
459: The \C\ detections are marked by filled boxes, open boxes indicate the
460: early \R\ HRI detection and $3\sigma$ upper limits.
461: Error bars are $\pm1\sigma$ statistical errors.
462: Time is given in days after the outburst.
463: The solid line represents a power-law fit to the
464: detections at days 82, 2,271 and 2,639. The dashed and dotted lines
465: represent models including an $e^{-\tau}$ term (see Section~3).
466: \label{f2}}
467:
468: \figcaption[f3.ps]
469: {Circumstellar matter density profile as a function of SN shell
470: expansion radius. The solid line gives the best-fit CSM density profile of
471: $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.9}$ for the \R\ (open boxes) and \C\ (filled boxes)
472: measurements of SN~1994I.
473: The CSM density profile with $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-1.6}$
474: based on \R\ observations of SN~1993J is drawn for comparison (dashed line and
475: open triangles; Immler, Aschenbach \& Wang 2001).
476: \label{f3}}
477:
478: \end{document}
479:
480: