1: \documentclass{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4:
5: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
6: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
7:
8: %\slugcomment{accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal (Letters)}
9:
10: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
11: \submitted{accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal (Letters)}
12:
13: \shorttitle{Optical Spectropolarimetry of SN~2002ap}
14: \shortauthors{Kawabata et al.}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{Optical Spectropolarimetry of SN~2002ap: A
19: High Velocity Asymmetric Explosion\footnotemark[1]}
20:
21: \footnotetext[1]{Based on data obtained at the Subaru Telescope,
22: which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of
23: Japan (NAOJ)}
24:
25: \author{K.~S.~Kawabata\altaffilmark{2,3},
26: D.~J.~Jeffery\altaffilmark{4},
27: M.~Iye\altaffilmark{2,5},
28: Y.~Ohyama\altaffilmark{6},
29: G.~Kosugi\altaffilmark{6},
30: N.~Kashikawa\altaffilmark{2},
31: N.~Ebizuka\altaffilmark{7},
32: T.~Sasaki\altaffilmark{6},
33: K.~Sekiguchi\altaffilmark{6},
34: K.~Nomoto\altaffilmark{8,9},
35: P.~Mazzali\altaffilmark{9,8,10},
36: J.~Deng\altaffilmark{9,8},
37: K.~Maeda\altaffilmark{8},
38: K.~Aoki\altaffilmark{6},
39: Y.~Saito\altaffilmark{2},
40: T.~Takata\altaffilmark{6},
41: M.~Yoshida\altaffilmark{11},
42: R.~Asai\altaffilmark{8},
43: M.~Inata\altaffilmark{11},
44: K.~Okita\altaffilmark{11},
45: K.~Ota\altaffilmark{8,2},
46: T.~Ozawa\altaffilmark{12},
47: Y.~Shimizu\altaffilmark{11},
48: H.~Taguchi\altaffilmark{13},
49: Y.~Yadoumaru\altaffilmark{12},
50: T.~Misawa\altaffilmark{8,2},
51: F.~Nakata\altaffilmark{8,2},
52: T.~Yamada\altaffilmark{2},
53: I.~Tanaka\altaffilmark{2},
54: and
55: T.~Kodama\altaffilmark{14}
56: }
57:
58: \altaffiltext{2}{Opt. \& IR Astron. Div., NAOJ, Mitaka,
59: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
60: \altaffiltext{3}{E-mail: koji.kawabata@nao.ac.jp}
61: \altaffiltext{4}{Dep. of Phys., New Mexico Institute of
62: Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA}
63: \altaffiltext{5}{Dep. of Astron., Graduate Univ.
64: for Advanced Studies, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
65: \altaffiltext{6}{Subaru Telescope, NAOJ, 650 North A'ohoku Place,
66: Hilo, HI 96720, USA}
67: \altaffiltext{7}{RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
68: \altaffiltext{8}{Dep. of Astron., Univ. of Tokyo,
69: Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
70: \altaffiltext{9}{Research Center for the Early Universe,
71: Univ. of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
72: \altaffiltext{10}{Osservatorio Astronomico, Via Tiepolo,
73: 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy}
74: \altaffiltext{11}{Okayama Astrophys. Obs., NAOJ,
75: Asakuchi-gun, Okayama 719-0232, Japan}
76: \altaffiltext{12}{Misato Obs., Amakusa-gun, Wakayama
77: 640-1366, Japan}
78: \altaffiltext{13}{Dep. of Astron. \& Earth Sci.,
79: Tokyo Gakugei University, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8501, Japan}
80: \altaffiltext{14}{Theory Div., NAOJ, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
81:
82:
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85: We present spectropolarimetry of the Type Ic supernova SN 2002ap
86: and give a preliminary analysis:
87: the data were taken at two epochs, close to and one month later than
88: the visual maximum (2002 February 8).
89: In addition we present June 9 spectropolarimetry without analysis.
90: The data show the development of linear polarization.
91: Distinct polarization profiles were seen only in the
92: \ion{O}{1}~$\lambda 7773$ multiplet/\ion{Ca}{2}~IR triplet
93: absorption trough at maximum light and in the
94: \ion{O}{1}~$\lambda 7773$ multiplet and
95: \ion{Ca}{2}~IR triplet absorption troughs
96: a month later, with the latter showing
97: a peak polarization as high as $\sim 2$ \%.
98: The intrinsic polarization shows three clear position angles:
99: $80\arcdeg$ for the February continuum, $120\arcdeg$ for the
100: February line feature, and $150\arcdeg$ for the March data.
101: We conclude that there are multiple asymmetric components
102: in the ejecta.
103: We suggest that the supernova has a bulk asymmetry with
104: an axial ratio projected on the sky that is different
105: from 1 by of order $10$ \%.
106: Furthermore, we suggest very speculatively that a high
107: velocity ejecta component moving faster than $\sim 0.115c$
108: (e.g., a jet) contributes to polarization
109: in the February epoch.
110: \end{abstract}
111:
112:
113:
114: \keywords{polarization --- supernovae: individual (SN 2002ap)}
115:
116:
117:
118:
119: \section{INTRODUCTION}
120:
121:
122: SN~2002ap was discovered in the nearby spiral galaxy M74 ($=$ NGC 628)
123: on 29 January 2002
124: \citep{nak02} and reached its maximum of $V\sim 12.4$ mag on
125: February 8 \citep{gal02}.
126: It has been classified as a Type~Ic supernova (SN~Ic) and
127: suggested to be a hypernova (but at the low-energy end of the
128: sequence of hypernovae;
129: % from the fact that its early spectra
130: %had very broad absorption lines
131: \citealt{maz02} and references therein).
132: %Because of its apparent optical brightness, SN~2002ap provided us
133: %with a rare opportunity to carry out multi-epoch,
134: %high-quality spectropolarimetry of a peculiar supernova.
135: %Unfortunately, the supernova was lost behind the Sun from
136: %mid-March to early June, limiting our ability to observe
137: %it in the brightest phase.
138:
139: %\section{SNe~IC, HYPERNOVAE, SUPERNOVA POLARIZATION}
140:
141: A SN Ic is thought to be the result of the core collapse of a
142: massive star that has either lost its hydrogen and helium envelopes
143: prior to the explosion or has an invisible helium envelope due to
144: low excitation.
145: The details of the explosion mechanism are still
146: under discussion (\citealt{nom95,bra01} and references
147: therein).
148: %
149: %It has recently been recognized that there is a subgroup
150: %of SNe Ic whose members, tentatively called hypernovae,
151: %exhibit very broad absorption lines in their early spectra.
152: %Some hypernovae have had their spectra successfully modeled as
153: %the hyperenergetic explosion of a massive C$+$O star,
154: %with an explosive kinetic energy exceeding $\sim 5$--$10$ times as
155: %much as that of normal core-collapse SNe
156: %(\citealt{iwa98,nom01} and references therein).
157: SN 1998bw, the most luminous and energetic
158: Type Ic
159: `hypernova' to date,
160: has been particularly well studied, and its
161: probable connection with the $\gamma$-ray burst GRB 980425 has been
162: pointed out (e.g., \citealt{gal98,iwa98,nom01}).
163: An aspherical hyperenergetic explosion has been suggested
164: to explain the
165: slowly-declining light curve of SN 1998bw and the narrowness
166: of the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6300, 6363 emission line in the
167: nebular phase \citep{maz01,nak01,mae02}.
168: %Alternatively, \citet{hoe99} suggested that the observed behavior
169: %could be explained by a moderate explosion
170: %($2\times 10^{51}$ ergs) if the ejecta had a prolate asphericity
171: %with an axial ratio of about 2 and were viewed close to the symmetry
172: %axis.
173:
174:
175: Intrinsic polarization is zero for SNe (which are unresolved
176: sources) if they are spherically symmetric:
177: any intrinsic polarization thus reveals asymmetry.
178: Core-collapse supernovae are, in fact, generally
179: polarized in the continuum at levels of
180: $p\simeq 0.5$--$4$ \%\ due to electron scattering and their
181: polarization increases after optical maximum light
182: (e.g., \citealt{jef91b,wan96,wan01,leo01b}); however, the polarization
183: falls to zero at very late times, when the electron scattering
184: opacity becomes very low (e.g., \citealt{jef91b}).
185: The typical line polarization profile---actually mostly
186: due to electron polarized light interacting with a line---predicted
187: theoretically \citep{jef89} and to some degree confirmed
188: observationally in SN~1987A and other supernovae
189: \citep{jef91a,jef91b,leo01a,leo01b},
190: is an inverted P~Cygni profile:
191: strong polarization maximum at the flux P~Cygni trough feature
192: and polarization minimum at the flux P~Cygni emission feature.
193: Line blending and other intrinsic effects can distort these
194: profiles.
195: For SN 1998bw, an intrinsic optical polarization of $0.4$--$0.6$ \%\
196: was found, suggesting an asymmetry of less than $2/1$ in the axial ratio
197: of the ejecta \citep{pat01,kay98}.
198: No distinct line polarization features were seen probably due to the
199: poor S/N or the relatively narrow wavelength range of
200: those observations.
201:
202:
203: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
204:
205: The spectropolarimetry was taken with the 8.2-m
206: Subaru Telescope equipped with the Faint Object Camera and
207: Spectrograph (FOCAS, \citealt{kas00,yos00})
208: from 2002 February 9 through June 9.
209: %The observing log is shown in Table \ref{tbl-1}.
210: For February and June observations, we used a 300 grooves mm$^{-1}$
211: grism (the central wavelength of 5500 \AA ) with a $0\farcs 4$ width
212: slit, resulting a spectral resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda$) was
213: $\sim 1200$.
214: For March observation, we used another 300 gr mm$^{-1}$
215: grism (7500 \AA ) with a $0\farcs 8$ width slit, resulting in
216: $\lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 650$.
217: The nightly total exposure time was 960 to 4000 sec.
218: The linear polarimetric module of FOCAS consists of a rotating
219: superachromatic half-wave plate and a crystal quartz Wollaston
220: prism, and both the ordinary and the extraordinary
221: rays are simultaneously recorded on two MIT/LL CCDs
222: (2k$\times$4k$\times$15\micron ).
223: A typical observing sequence consisted of four integrations
224: at the $\psi=0\arcdeg, 45\arcdeg, 22\fdg 5$ and $67\fdg 5$
225: positions of the half-wave plate.
226: Stokes $Q/I$ and $U/I$ were calculated as in \S 6.1.2 of \citet{tin96}.
227: For polarimetric calibration, we obtained data for unpolarized
228: and polarized standard stars, including measurements
229: of flatfield lamps through fully-polarizing filters.
230: %Although the stability of instrumental polarization and
231: %depolarization in FOCAS on the Subaru Telescope have not
232: %yet been fully calibrated, our results indicate that the
233: %instrumental polarization ($\lesssim 0.1$ \%) and
234: %the depolarization factor ($\lesssim 0.05$) are negligible at
235: %all wavelengths.
236: The flux was calibrated using observations of G191B2B and
237: BD+28$\arcdeg$4211 \citep{oke90},
238: and then was multiplied by a constant to match the
239: VSNET\footnote{\url{http://www/kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet}}
240: photometric data.
241:
242:
243: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSION}
244:
245: Figure \ref{fig1} shows the observed flux and polarization spectra.
246: Several blueshifted broad absorption lines can be identified
247: in the February flux spectrum \citep{maz02}.
248: For March and June flux spectra a detailed analysis
249: has yet to be done.
250: However, we note that the March spectra resemble that of
251: SN~1997ef at day 67 \citep{maz00}, including the onset of
252: net emission in \ion{Ca}{2} $\lambda\lambda$8498, 8542, 8662
253: (i.e., the \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet).
254: The significant emission line at $\sim 6300$\AA\ in the June spectrum
255: is identified as [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6300, 6363 as in
256: SN~1997ef \citep{maz01}.
257: The polarization is $\gtrsim 0.5$ \%\ at a position angle (PA) of
258: $\theta =120\arcdeg \pm 20\arcdeg$
259: over the observed wavelengths.
260: Significant day-by-day variation is not seen in the
261: polarization spectra within each month.
262: Here we will only analyze monthly averages.
263:
264:
265: %\subsection{Interstellar Polarization}
266: \subsection{Interstellar and Intrinsic Polarization}
267:
268:
269: Interstellar polarization (ISP) varies slowly with
270: wavelength in the optical and
271: is well approximated by the empirical formula
272: $p_{\rm ISP}(\lambda ) = p_{\rm max} \cdot \exp [ -1.15 \ln^{2}(
273: \lambda_{\rm max}/\lambda) ]$,
274: where $p_{\rm max}=p_{\rm ISP}(\lambda_{\rm max})$ is the
275: peak polarization (\citet{ser75}, hereafter SMF).
276: In March the emission feature of the \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet line
277: profile shows strong net emission due to NLTE processes.
278: Such NLTE line flux is necessarily unpolarized on emission.
279: Since the line profile is still broad (absorption minimum at a
280: $\sim -14,000$ km s$^{-1}$ redshift, corresponding to an enclosed
281: mass of 2 M$_{\odot}$ in model CO100/4, which has a total
282: mass of 2.4 M$_{\odot}$ \citep{maz02}),
283: much of the emission is
284: probably coming from far out in the ejecta, where the
285: electron optical depth is low.
286: We conclude that the flux from this emission line is mostly
287: unscattered by electrons and unpolarized, and that it
288: dilutes the polarized electron scattered flux.
289: If this were the only effect, then the intrinsic polarization
290: should show a distinct minimum nearly exactly at the wavelength
291: of the flux emission maximum.
292: Since, in fact, the polarization is roughly constant
293: across the P~Cygni emission feature ($8400$--$9000$ \AA ),
294: apart from small variations that may be mostly noise,
295: the line is not only diluting the polarized
296: flux but is also probably strongly depolarizing it.
297: The intrinsic polarization across the emission feature
298: is probably close to zero.
299: We will assume that the observed polarization of the emission
300: feature is the ISP: thus
301: $p_{\rm ISP}(8600\;{\rm \AA})\approx 0.5$ \%.
302: We next adopt the median $\lambda_{\rm max}=5370$ \AA\
303: found by SMF for 30 stars with $p_{\rm max} / E_{B-V}\geq 7.0$.
304: Then from a non-linear regression we find
305: $p_{\rm max}=0.64\pm 0.20$ \%\ and
306: $\theta_{\rm ISP}=120\arcdeg\pm 10\arcdeg$.
307: (The uncertainties are crude estimates based on the
308: alternative assumption that only line flux dilution, and not
309: line depolarization, occurs in the region of the
310: \ion{Ca}{2} IR triplet emission feature.)
311: Since \citet{tak02} derive a color excess for SN~2002ap
312: of $E_{B-V}=0.09$ (a sum of $0.07$ within our Galaxy and
313: $0.02$ within M74) from interstellar Na D absorptions,
314: our assumption of the SMF $\lambda_{\rm max}$
315: is consistent: $p_{\rm max} / E_{B-V} = 0.64 / 0.09 \approx 7$.
316:
317:
318: The estimated ISP (EISP) is consistent with other factors.
319: In an ISP catalog \citep{hei00},
320: 16 stars are within $10\arcdeg$ of SN~2002ap.
321: The data for these stars suggest a possible positive correlation
322: between polarization and the distance along the line
323: of sight toward SN~2002ap.
324: The two most distant stars among them, HD8919 ($d=525$ pc)
325: and HD9560 ($d=437$ pc) show
326: $(p,\ \theta) = (0.32\pm 0.10$ \mbox{ \%},
327: $99\arcdeg\pm 9\arcdeg)$ and
328: $(0.48\pm 0.09$ \mbox{ \%},
329: $123\arcdeg\pm 5\arcdeg)$, respectively.
330: On the other hand, it has been found that $p_{\rm max} (\% )$
331: has an empirical upper limit of $9E_{B-V}$ (SMF).
332: From the derived $E_{B-V} = 0.09$, an upper limit
333: on the ISP toward the supernova is $0.81$ \%.
334: The EISP is nicely sandwiched between the possible
335: lower bounds of the cited stars and the empirical upper limit.
336: The EISP position angle is also consistent with
337: the position angle of the spiral arm in M74 at the position
338: of SN~2002ap, $110\arcdeg$--$140\arcdeg$ (see DPOSS images).
339: The June 9 polarization spectrum has polarization consistent
340: with the EISP at the peak of the strong emission flux of the
341: [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6300, 6363 forbidden line (Figure \ref{fig1}c):
342: one would expect that polarization to be ISP for a strong emission
343: line in the nebular epoch.
344: (The June 9 data has low S/N: in the following, we analyze only the
345: higher S/N polarization spectra of the earlier two epochs.
346:
347:
348: %\subsection{Intrinsic Polarization}
349:
350:
351: Figure \ref{fig2} shows the intrinsic (i.e, EISP-subtracted) polarization
352: plotted on a {\it QU} diagram:
353: the polarization points are connected according
354: to their wavelength ordering.
355: %(The ISP correction was done by subtracting the ISP Stokes
356: %parameters from observed ones.)
357: Given the uncertainty in the EISP, points within
358: $0.2$ \%\ of the origin must be considered very uncertain.
359:
360: If one assumes that the intrinsic supernova polarization is produced
361: by a single axisymmetric component in the ejecta, then
362: the intrinsic polarization plotted on a {\it QU} diagram
363: should lie on a line passing through the origin.
364: It can be seen that the polarization in February has two clear
365: position angles, PA less than or $\sim 120\arcdeg$ (associated
366: with the \ion{O}{1}/\ion{Ca}{2} line trough) and
367: PA$\sim 80\arcdeg \pm 20\arcdeg$ (associated with the continuum
368: from $\sim 5700$--$8200$ \AA), joined by a somewhat complicated
369: transition.
370: The polarization in March has a clear position angle
371: PA$\sim 150\arcdeg$ associated with the \ion{Ca}{2} line trough
372: and with at least some of the continuum.
373: We conclude that there are multiple asymmetric components,
374: and that their contribution varies with time.
375: It is likely that the recession of the supernova photosphere uncovers
376: different asymmetries.
377:
378:
379: \subsection{Possible Models}
380:
381: Figures \ref{fig3}a, b, and c show the flux and
382: intrinsic polarization corrected for
383: heliocentric redshift [$v_{\rm helio}=+631 \mbox{\rm km s}^{-1}$
384: \citep{sma02}] and interstellar extinction ($E_{B-V}=0.09$).
385: The figures show that polarization is low and barely significant
386: (given the uncertainty in the EISP), except in the regions
387: $\sim 6700$--$8000$ \AA\ for February and $\sim 6700$--$8300$
388: \AA\ for March.
389:
390: The low continuum polarization blueward of
391: $\sim 6700$ \AA\ in both epochs may be due to the depolarizing
392: effect of lines \citep{how01}:
393: in supernova spectra, lines generally become stronger further
394: to the blue.
395: The continuum polarization, where it is significant
396: (a relatively small region) is $\sim 0.4$ \% in both epochs.
397: If the asymmetry is assumed to be an axisymmetric,
398: global prolate or oblate asymmetry, then
399: the continuum polarization can be explained by
400: an axial ratio (assuming there is a main axis) projected on the sky
401: that is different from 1 by of order $10$ \%.
402: This estimate is a crude one based on realistic,
403: but parameterized, calculations \citep{hoe91,hoe95}.
404: The estimate is also crude because, as noted above, the
405: asymmetry cannot be completely axisymmetric.
406: The estimated asymmetry is not large, compared to those estimated for
407: some other supernovae (e.g., \citealt{wan01}).
408:
409:
410: The three distinct line polarization profiles seen in
411: Figure~\ref{fig3} (at the \ion{O}{1}/\ion{Ca}{2} flux absorption
412: in February and the \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} flux absorptions
413: in March) can partially be
414: accounted for by the inverted P~Cygni profile
415: (see \S~1): the polarization maxima associated with line
416: trough features are clear.
417: Without detailed modeling more information probably cannot be
418: extracted from these profiles.
419:
420:
421: For the February continuum polarization, we suggest a
422: radically different origin from the bulk asymmetry
423: assumed in prolate/oblate
424: models or element inhomogeneity models (see below).
425: In Figure~\ref{fig3}d we show the intrinsic polarized flux ($p\times F$)
426: compared to the observed flux scaled down by a factor of $0.0018$ and
427: non-relativistically redshifted by a velocity of $0.23c$:
428: i.e., $\lambda_{\rm redshifted}=\lambda/0.77$.
429: There is fair agreement over the range $\sim 5000$--$8000$ \AA.
430: In response to this comparison, \citet{leo02} made
431: a similar comparison for their SN 2002ap spectropolarimetry and
432: also obtained a similarly good agreement.
433: The agreement suggests (but does not prove)
434: that a large component of polarized flux comes from
435: electron scattering in an ionized clump (i.e., a jet)
436: thrown out of the supernova explosion.
437: (We assume a single jet or clump for simplicity here, although
438: a pair of bipolar jets are a physical possibility
439: (e.g., \citealt{whe02}).)
440: In a simple non-relativistic picture,
441: the scattered light is redshifted by
442: $v_{\rm red}\sim v_{\rm jet}(1+\cos i)$, where,
443: $v_{\rm red}=0.23c$, $v_{\rm jet}$
444: is the characteristic velocity of scattering relative to
445: the supernova center, and $i$ is the inclination
446: angle of jet to the line of sight measured from the far side
447: of the supernova.
448: The jet polarization component is calculated from
449: \[
450: p_{\rm jet}(\lambda) =
451: f\cdot\frac{F[\lambda(1-v_{\rm red}/c)]}{F(\lambda)} \mbox{ ,}
452: \]
453: where $F(\lambda)$ is the corrected flux,
454: $1-v_{\rm red}/c$ is the blueshift back to the origin of
455: the scattered flux observed at $\lambda$, and the scale
456: factor $f=0.0018$: $f$ accounts both for
457: the polarization of the jet scattered flux and the fraction scattered.
458: The polarization is wavelength dependent even though
459: electron scattering is wavelength-independent since the scattered
460: flux comes from a bluer part of the spectrum than the
461: part it is added to.
462: Electron scattering depends on scattering direction:
463: e.g., maximum polarization occurs for $i=90^{\circ}$;
464: half as much for $i=45^{\circ}$ or $135^{\circ}$;
465: zero for $i=0^{\circ}$ or $180^{\circ}$.
466: The jet velocities corresponding to $i=90^{\circ}$,
467: $45^{\circ}$, and $0^{\circ}$ are
468: $0.23c$, $0.135c$, and $0.115c$, respectively.
469: Thus $0.115c$ is a lower bound on the jet velocity
470: and $i\gtrsim 90^{\circ}$ would require a somewhat
471: relativistic jet.
472:
473:
474: High velocity jet-like clumps have been
475: proposed in some hydrodynamic explosion models for SNe and GRB's
476: (e.g., \citealt{nag97,mac99,mae02,whe02}).
477: If a jet is thrown out of an exploding supernova core,
478: then it is plausible that it carries some radioactive $^{56}$Ni.
479: The gamma-rays from decay would keep the jet ionized to
480: some degree just as they keep the nebular phase bulk ejecta ionized.
481:
482:
483: If the jet picture is correct, then the position angle
484: of the jet on the sky is $\sim 170^{\circ}$ (or $\sim 350^{\circ}$)
485: since the jet polarization component has position angle $\sim 80^{\circ}$
486: and electron scattering polarizes perpendicularly to the
487: scattering plane.
488: The \ion{O}{1}/\ion{Ca}{2} line polarization maximum in the February
489: data cannot easily be associated with the jet.
490: As Figure~2 shows, the observed position angle makes
491: an excursion from $\sim 80^{\circ}$
492: up to $120^{\circ}$ across the polarization maximum.
493: Some of the line polarization may arise
494: in the bulk asymmetry of the supernova.
495: It is possible that the position angle of
496: $\sim 120^{\circ}$ is the net result of a jet polarizing at
497: $\sim 80^{\circ}$ and a bulk asymmetry polarizing at
498: $\sim 150^{\circ}$ (i.e., at the position angle
499: observed in the March data).
500: To test this model we have eliminated the jet polarization component
501: from the February intrinsic polarization by subtracting
502: jet polarization Stokes parameters from the intrinsic polarization
503: Stokes parameters.
504: The residual polarization and position angle spectra are
505: plotted in Figures \ref{fig3}e,f.
506: The position angle of the residual polarization for
507: February from the region of significant polarization
508: (i.e., $\sim 6700$--$8000$ \AA) is now approximately
509: centered on $150^{\circ}$ and deviates by more than
510: $30^{\circ}$ only in a few isolated points.
511: The results in Figure~\ref{fig3}f are thus consistent with
512: the jet model.
513:
514: The jet may not be a completely separated amount of ejecta,
515: but rather a blob rich in $^{56}$Ni moving at $\gtrsim 0.115c$.
516: A high-velocity, $^{56}$Ni-rich region is required both in the
517: hypernova explosion models of SN 1998bw \citep{nak01,mae02},
518: and in SN~2002ap
519: \citep{maz02} in order to reproduce the light curves.
520: Spectral synthesis for SN~2002ap \citep{maz02} suggests
521: some material at velocities higher than the photospheric
522: velocities of $\sim 0.1c$--$0.117c$ \citep{maz02,kin02} up to $0.22c$.
523: The ionization of the blob would likely be increased by radioactive
524: $^{56}$Ni and this would likely make the blob more polarizing
525: than other parts of the ejecta at the same velocity leading to
526: net polarization.
527: Other chemical inhomogeneities in the ejecta at varying velocities
528: are also possible \citep{mae02} and would affect polarization in
529: complicated ways.
530:
531:
532:
533: \section{CONCLUDING REMARKS}
534:
535:
536: Our results are summarized in the Abstract.
537: %In this Letter we have presented spectropolarimetry for
538: %SN~2002ap and given its first order interpretation.
539: %We suggest that the supernova has a bulk asymmetry with
540: %an axial ratio projected on the sky that is different from 1
541: %by of order $10$ \% and speculatively a single polarizing jet
542: %moving at $\gtrsim 0.115c$.
543: %The jet can make a significant contribution to the
544: %polarization only in the February observational epoch.
545: More realistic modeling is necessary for a more
546: definitive understanding of the polarization.
547: The degree of the bulk asymmetry suggested in this paper may be tested
548: with the line widths and their ratios in the nebular spectrum
549: \citep{mae02}.
550:
551:
552: \acknowledgments
553:
554: We are grateful to the staff members at the Subaru Telescope
555: for their kind help and their rearrangement of the telescope
556: maintenance schedule for our observation on March 8.
557: This work has been supported in part by the grant-in-Aid
558: for Scientific Research (12640233, 14047206, 14540223) and
559: COE research (07CE2002) of the Ministry of Education, Science,
560: Culture, Sports, and Technology in Japan.
561:
562:
563:
564: \begin{thebibliography}{}
565:
566:
567: \bibitem[Branch(2001)]{bra01} Branch, D. 2001,
568: in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. M. Livio, N. Panagia
569: and K. Sahu (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 96
570: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis(1989)]{car89} Cardelli, J. A.,
571: Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
572: \bibitem[Galama et al.(1998)]{gal98} Galama, T. J., et al. 1998,
573: \nat, 395, 670
574: \bibitem[Gal-Yam, Ofek, \& Shemmer(2002)]{gal02} Gal-Yam, A.,
575: Ofek, E. O., \& Shemmer, O. 2002, \mnras, 332, L73
576: \bibitem[Heiles(2000)]{hei00} Heiles, C. 2000, \aj, 119, 923
577: \bibitem[H\"oflich(1991)]{hoe91} H\"oflich, P. 1991, \aap, 246, 481
578: \bibitem[H\"oflich(1995)]{hoe95} H\"oflich, P. 1995, \apj, 440, 821
579: %\bibitem[H\"oflich, Wheeler, \& Wang(1999)]{hoe99} H\"oflich, P.,
580: %Wheeler, J. C. \& Wang, L. 1999, \apj, 521, 179
581: \bibitem[Howell et al.(2001)]{how01} Howell, D. A., H\"oflich, P.,
582: Wang, L., \& Wheeler, J. C. 2001, \apj, 556, 302
583: \bibitem[Iwamoto et al.(1998)]{iwa98} Iwamoto, K., et al. 1998,
584: \nat, 395, 672
585: \bibitem[Jeffery(1989)]{jef89} Jeffery, D. J. 1989, \apjs, 71, 951
586: \bibitem[Jeffery(1991a)]{jef91a} Jeffery, D. J. 1991a, \apj, 375, 264
587: \bibitem[Jeffery(1991b)]{jef91b} Jeffery, D. J. 1991b, \apjs, 77, 405
588: \par
589: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2000)]{kas00} Kashikawa, N., et al. 2000,
590: Proc. SPIE, 4008, 104
591: \bibitem[Kay et al.(1998)]{kay98} Kay, L. E., Halpern, J. P., Leighly,
592: K. M., Heathcote, S., \&\ Magalhaes, A. M. 1998, \iaucirc, No. 6969
593: \bibitem[Kinugasa et al.(2002)]{kin02} Kinugasa, K., et al. 2002,
594: \apj, 577, L97
595: \bibitem[Leonard \& Filippenko(2001)]{leo01a} Leonard, D. C.,
596: Filippenko, A. V. 2001, \pasp, 113, 920
597: \bibitem[Leonard et al.(2001)]{leo01b} Leonard, D. C.,
598: Filippenko, A. V., Ardila, D. R., \& Brotherton, M. S. 2001,
599: \apj, 553, 861
600: \bibitem[Leonard et al.(2002)]{leo02} Leonard, D. C.,
601: Filippenko, A. V., Chornock, R., \& Foley, R. J. 2002,
602: \pasp, in press
603: \bibitem[MacFadyen \& Woosley(1999)]{mac99} MacFadyen, A. I., \&
604: Woosley, S. E. 1999, \apj, 524, 262
605: \bibitem[Maeda et al.(2002)]{mae02} Maeda, K., Nakamura, T., Nomoto, K.,
606: Mazzali, P. A., Patat, F., \& Hachisu, I. 2002, \apj, 565, 405
607: \bibitem[Mazzali, Iwamoto, \& Nomoto(2000)]{maz00} Mazzali, P. A.,
608: Iwamoto, K., \& Nomoto, K. 2000, \apj, 545, 407
609: \bibitem[Mazzali et al.(2001)]{maz01} Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K.,
610: Patat, F., \& Maeda, K. 2001, \apj, 559, 1047
611: \bibitem[Mazzali et al.(2002)]{maz02} Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2002,
612: ApJ, 572, L61
613: \bibitem[Nagataki et al.(1997)]{nag97} Nagataki, S., Hashimoto, M.,
614: Sato, K., \& Yamada, S. 1997, \apj, 486, 1026
615: \bibitem[Nakamura et al.(2001)]{nak01} Nakamura, T., Mazzali, P. A.,
616: Nomoto, K., \& Iwamoto, K. 2001, \apj, 550, 991
617: \bibitem[Nakano et al.(2002)]{nak02} Nakano, S., \& Hirose, Y.
618: 2002, \iaucirc, No. 7810
619: \bibitem[Nomoto, Iwamoto, \& Suzuki(1995)]{nom95} Nomoto, K.,
620: Iwamoto, K., \& Suzuki, T. 1995, \physrep, 256, 173
621: \bibitem[Nomoto et al.(2001)]{nom01} Nomoto, K., et al. 2001,
622: in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. M. Livio, N. Panagia
623: and K. Sahu (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 144
624: \bibitem[Oke(1990)]{oke90} Oke, J. B. 1990, \aj, 99, 1621
625: \bibitem[Patat et al.(2001)]{pat01} Patat, F., et al. 2001, \apj, 555,900
626: \bibitem[Serkowski, Mathewson, \& Ford(1975)]{ser75} Serkowski, K.,
627: Mathewson, D. S., \& Ford, V. L. 1975, \apj, 196, 261 (SMF)
628: \bibitem[Smartt \& Meikle(2002)]{sma02} Smartt, S., \& Meikle, P. 2002,
629: \iaucirc, No. 7822
630: \bibitem[Takada-Hidai, Aoki, \& Zhao(2002)]{tak02} Takada-Hidai, M,
631: Aoki, W., \& Zhao, G. 2002, in preparation
632: \bibitem[Tinbergen(1996)]{tin96} Tinbergen, J. 1996,
633: Astronomical Polarimetry (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press)
634: \bibitem[Wang et al.(1996)]{wan96} Wang, L., Wheeler, J. C.,
635: Li, Z., \& Clocchiatti, A. 1996, \apj, 467, 435
636: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2001)]{wan01} Wang, L., Howell, D. A., H\"oflich, P.,
637: \& Wheeler, J. C. 2001, \apj, 550, 1030
638: \bibitem[Wheeler, Meier, \& Wilson(2002)]{whe02} Wheeler, J. C.,
639: Meier, D. L., \& Wilson, J. R. 2002, \apj, 568, 807
640: \bibitem[Yoshida et al.(2000)]{yos00} Yoshida, M., et al. 2000,
641: Proc. SPIE, 4009, 240
642: \end{thebibliography}
643:
644:
645:
646: \clearpage
647:
648:
649: %{\scriptsize
650: %\begin{deluxetable}{lccrr}
651: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
652: %%\rotate
653: %\tablenum{1}
654: %\tablewidth{0pt}
655: %\tablecaption{Log of Observations for SN~2002ap\label{tbl-1}}
656: %\tablehead{
657: %\colhead{Date (UT)} &
658: %\colhead{Grism\tablenotemark{a}} &
659: %\colhead{$\lambda\lambda$ (\AA )\tablenotemark{b}} &
660: %\colhead{$\lambda/\Delta\lambda$} &
661: %\colhead{$\Delta t$ (s)}
662: %}
663: %\startdata
664: %2002 Feb 9.2 & 300/5500 & 4750--8300 & 1200 & $1200$ \\
665: %2002 Feb 9.3 & 300/5500 & 3850--6050 & 1200 & $2800$ \\
666: %2002 Feb 10.3 & 300/5500 & 4750--8300 & 1200 & $1200$ \\
667: %2002 Feb 11.3 & 300/5500 & 4750--8300 & 1200 & $1600$ \\
668: %2002 Feb 11.3 & 300/5500 & 3850--6050 & 1200 & $1600$ \\
669: %2002 Feb 12.3\tablenotemark{c} & 300/5500 & 4750--8300 & 1200 & $1200$ \\
670: %2002 Mar 8.2 & 300/7500 & 4850--9050 & 650 & $960$ \\
671: %2002 Mar 10.2 & 300/7500 & 4850--9050 & 650 & $1080$ \\
672: %2002 Jun 9.6 & 300/5500 & 4750--8300 & 1200 & $1200$ \\
673: %\tablenotetext{a}{Grooves per millimeter/central wavelength in angstroms}
674: %\tablenotetext{b}{Effective wavelength range of the observation, which
675: %depends on the combination of the grism and the order-cut filter used.}
676: %\tablenotetext{c}{On February 12 we could not carry out the whole sequence of
677: %polarimetry because of unstable weather, and so obtained only flux data.}
678: %\tablerefs{}
679: %\tablecomments{}
680: %\enddata
681: %\end{deluxetable}
682: %}
683: %
684: %\clearpage
685:
686:
687:
688: \figcaption[Kawabata.fig1.eps]{Flux and polarization spectra of SN
689: 2002ap. Heliocentric redshift, interstellar extinction and
690: polarization have not been corrected for.
691: From top to bottom, we plot (a) total flux, (b, c) polarization
692: level $p$ and position angle $\theta$ on each observation day
693: as indicated.
694: The polarimetric data are binned to a constant photon noise
695: of $0.05$ \%
696: which is shown by the error bars of polarization points.
697: The EISP component is shown by a dashed curve in (b,c).
698: \label{fig1}}
699:
700:
701:
702: \figcaption[Kawabata.fig2.eps]{{\it QU}-diagram of the monthly-averaged
703: intrinsic (i.e., ISP-subtracted)
704: polarization for February and March epochs.
705: The data are binned to
706: a constant photon noise of $0.04$ \%.
707: It can be seen that the polarization in February has, at least, two
708: preferred axes: PA$\sim 120\arcdeg$ (associated with the
709: \ion{O}{1}/\ion{Ca}{2} line trough) and PA$\sim 80\arcdeg$
710: (associated with the continuum).
711: The polarization in March has a clear position angle PA$\sim 150\arcdeg$
712: associated with the \ion{Ca}{2} line trough and the significantly
713: polarized continuum.
714: These position angles are indicated by thick arrows.
715: Note that the position angle on the sky is half the angular
716: location on a {\it QU} diagram.
717: \label{fig2}}
718:
719:
720:
721: \figcaption[Kawabata.fig3.eps]{Intrinsic polarization
722: spectra corrected for heliocentric redshift and interstellar extinction.
723: From top to bottom, we plot (a) total flux in erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
724: \AA$^{-1}$, (b) polarization level $p$, (c) position angle $\theta$,
725: (d) polarized flux, and (e,f) $p$ and $\theta$ of the residual
726: polarization after the jet polarization component has been
727: subtracted from the February data.
728: The February flux is the mean of Feb 9 and 11, and the March
729: flux is the mean of Mar 8 and 10.
730: We adopt
731: % a heliocentric redshift $+631$ km s$^{-1}$ for M74
732: %(Smartt \& Meikle 2002), a color excess of $E_{B-V}=0.07$
733: %in our Galaxy and $0.02$ in M74 (Takada-Hidai et al. 2002) and
734: the normal interstellar extinction curve (Cardelli, Clayton,
735: \& Mathis 1989).
736: Deep absorption bands due to the terrestrial atmosphere
737: and the interstellar medium have been removed by interpolation
738: using nearby continuum levels.
739: The polarimetric data are binned in the same manner as in Fig. 2.
740: The solid curve in (d) is the February flux multiplied by
741: $0.0018$ and redshifted by $+0.23c$ (see \S 3.2).
742: \label{fig3}}
743:
744: \plotone{f1.eps}
745: \plotone{f2.eps}
746: \plotone{f3.eps}
747:
748: %\clearpage
749:
750: \end{document}
751: