1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{aasms4,lscape}
3: \textheight9in
4: \topmargin-0.3in
5: %\tighten
6:
7: \def\gtsima{$\, \buildrel > \over \sim \,$}
8: \def\ltsima{$\, \buildrel < \over \sim \,$}
9: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
10: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{$K$-Band Red Clump Distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud}
15:
16:
17: \author{David R. Alves}
18: \affil{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory,
19: 550 W. 120th St., MailCode 5247, NY, NY, 10027 \\
20: Email: {\tt alves@astro.columbia.edu} }
21:
22: \author{Marina Rejkuba\altaffilmark{1}}
23: \affil{European Southern Observatory,
24: Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748 Garching, Germany \\
25: Email: {\tt mrejkuba@eso.org} }
26:
27: \altaffiltext{1}{Depto.~de Astronomia, P.~Universidad Catolica,
28: Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile }
29:
30: \author{Dante Minniti}
31: \affil{Depto.~de Astronomia, P.~Universidad Catolica,
32: Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile \\
33: Email: {\tt dante@astro.puc.cl} }
34:
35: \author{Kem H. Cook}
36: \affil{Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
37: Livermore, CA 94550 \\
38: Email: {\tt kcook@llnl.gov } }
39:
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: The {\it Hipparcos} $I$-band calibration
43: of horizontal-branch red clump giants
44: as standard candles has lead to controversial
45: results for the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC).
46: In an attempt to properly ascertain
47: the corrections for interstellar extinction and
48: clump age and metallicity,
49: we analyze new multi-wavelength luminosity functions
50: of the LMC red clump.
51: Our photometry dataset in the $K$-band
52: was obtained with the SOFI infrared imager
53: at the European Southern Observatory's New Technology Telescope.
54: In the $V$ and $I$ passbands, we employ data from
55: WFPC2 onboard the {\it Hubble Space Telescope\,}.
56: The LMC red clump is first identified in a
57: $K$,$(V-K)$ color-magnitude diagram.
58: Our luminosity functions
59: yield apparent magnitudes
60: of $K$ = 16.974, $I$ = 18.206, and
61: $V$ = 19.233 (\,$\pm 0.009_r \pm 0.02_s$; random and
62: systematic error, respectively).
63: Compared directly to the {\it Hipparcos\,} red clump calibration
64: (without a correction for age and metallicity),
65: the LMC clump measurements
66: imply a negative interstellar reddening correction.
67: This unphysical result indicates a population difference between clumps.
68: A modified calibration
69: based on theoretical modeling yields
70: an average reddening correction of
71: $E(B-V) = 0.089 \pm 0.015_r$, and
72: a true LMC distance modulus of $\mu_0 = 18.493 \pm 0.033_r
73: \pm 0.03_s$. We reconcile our result with the
74: short distance previously derived from OGLE~II red clump data.
75:
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: \keywords{distance scale --
79: galaxies: distances and redshifts --
80: galaxies: individual (Large Magellanic Cloud) --
81: stars: Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram --
82: stars: horizontal-branch }
83:
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: The {\it Hipparcos\,} satellite mission
88: yielded parallax measurements
89: for hundreds of nearby red clump stars, and these are, collectively,
90: the best calibrated standard candle
91: (Paczy\'{n}ski \& Stanek 1998; Paczy\'{n}ski~2001).
92: However, attempts to use
93: the {\it Hipparcos\,} $I$-band red clump calibration
94: to determine the
95: distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)
96: have lead to controversial results.
97: Udalski et al.~(1998) obtained $\mu_0 = 18.08 \pm 0.03_r \pm 0.12_s$
98: (random and systematic error, respectively),
99: which was subsequently revised upward
100: to $\mu_0 = 18.24 \pm 0.08$ (Udalski 2000).
101: Stanek, Zaritsky and Harris~(1998) found
102: $\mu_0 = 18.07 \pm 0.03_r \pm 0.09_s$.
103: However,
104: Zaritsky (1999) showed that the reddening correction
105: used by Stanek et al.~(1998) was overestimated.
106: Romaniello et al.~(2000) found
107: $\mu_0 = 18.59 \pm 0.04_r \pm 0.08_s$
108: by analyzing {\it Hubble Space Telescope\,} ({\it HST\,}) photometry
109: of the LMC red clump.
110: Girardi and Salaris (2001) review
111: these measurements, and apply new
112: model corrections for population
113: effects (i.e.~age and metallicity).
114: They find a population correction
115: in the $I$-band of 0.2~mag.
116: Consequently, they revise the Udalski (2000)
117: result to $\mu_0 = 18.37 \pm 0.07$, and the
118: Zaritsky (1999) and Romaniello et al.~(2000) result
119: to $\mu_0 = 18.55 \pm 0.05$.
120:
121:
122: Alves~(2000) demonstrated the use of the red clump as a standard candle
123: at longer wavelengths; he calibrated the
124: {\it Hipparcos} red clump absolute magnitude in the $K$-band,
125: and applied the calibration to the Galactic bulge red clump.
126: One advantage of working in
127: this $\sim$2$\micron$ passband is the particularly small effect
128: of extinction by interstellar dust
129: (e.g.~Schlegel et al.~1998).
130: Grocholski and Sarajedini (2002) recently studied
131: population effects on the red clump's $K$-band absolute magnitude
132: by compiling 2MASS photometry of open clusters.
133: They concluded that $M_K$ is, in general, also less sensitive
134: to population effects than $M_I$.
135: The red clump models
136: of Girardi and Salaris (2001)
137: were also shown to be in fair agreement
138: with the $K$-band open cluster data.
139: In this {\it Letter\,},
140: we present a deep $K$-band
141: luminosity function for red clump stars
142: in the LMC bar and inner-disk.
143: We also construct a $K$, $(V-K)$ color-magnitude
144: diagram, and complementary $V$ and $I$ luminosity functions.
145: This is a first reconnaissance of optical
146: and near-infrared photometry of the LMC red clump.
147:
148: \section{Data}
149:
150: The 6 lines-of-sight studied in this paper are centered on
151: the source stars of LMC microlensing events
152: discovered by the MACHO Project (Alcock et al.~2001;
153: events 4, 7, 9, 12, 14, and 18).
154: For our purposes,
155: the lines-of-sight
156: were selected at random by the natural occurrence of
157: microlensing\footnote{Actually, event 12 may be a
158: supernova in a galaxy behind the LMC, but this
159: distinction does not affect the current work.}.
160: The 6-field average line-of-sight intersects the LMC disk
161: at $\alpha$ = 05:25:55.2 and $\delta$ = $-$70:20:24~(J2000).
162: This is $0^{\circ}.49$ from the center of the LMC,
163: nearly perpendicular to the line-of-nodes, and
164: on the far side of the inclined disk (van~der~Marel et al.~2002).
165: The geometric correction
166: is small, about 0.6\% in distance (0.013 mag), and in
167: the sense that our clump giants are farther away
168: than those at the LMC center.
169:
170:
171: The $K$-band dataset analyzed here was obtained with
172: the SOFI infrared imager
173: at the European Southern Observatory's New Technology Telescope;
174: it is a 1024$\times$1024 array with a pixel
175: size of 0$^{\prime\prime}$.292. The total field-of-view
176: of our trimmed (equal-exposure) images after coadding
177: individual dithered frames is about 140 $\sq^{\,\prime}$.
178: The photometry was derived with DAOPHOT II (Stetson 1994),
179: and calibrated with observations of 6 standard stars (Persson et al.~1998).
180: Conditions were photometric (Rejkuba et al.~2001).
181: The 1-$\sigma$ standard deviation of the calibration solution
182: is 0.028~mag.
183: Over 98\% of the stars in the red clump
184: (or brighter; $K < 18$)
185: were detected with a signal-to-noise $>$ 10, and
186: thus our SOFI red clump data are nearly complete.
187: The $K_s$ mag system employed (``K-short'')
188: is the same as 2MASS.
189: In order to check our standardized zero point, we
190: matched a subset of the SOFI data
191: with 2MASS second incremental release
192: photometry\footnote{{\tt http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/}.}.
193: A comparison
194: shows no zero-point difference to within 0.02~mag
195: (for stars with colors like the red clump).
196: However,
197: all of the stars in the comparison are actually redder and
198: brighter than the clump, and thus the
199: agreement found lends only weak support to the
200: accuracy of our data.
201: Finally, $K_s$~magnitudes are related to
202: the $K$-band red clump data compiled by Alves (2000)
203: by $K = K_s + 0.044$ (Grocholski \& Sarajedini 2002;
204: their Eqn.~2).
205: We transform $K_s$ to $K$ accordingly.
206:
207:
208: Our dataset in $V$ and $I$ was obtained
209: with WFPC2 onboard the {\it HST\,}
210: (PI:~Cook).
211: We exclude the PC2 images from our analysis.
212: This guarantees a homogeneous $V$ and $I$ photometry dataset,
213: and represents only a small loss in imaged area.
214: The 3 WFs are 800$\times$800 pixel arrays
215: with a pixel size of 0$^{\prime\prime}$.1.
216: The resulting total field-of-view
217: is approximately 32~$\sq^{\,\prime}$.
218: The {\it HST\,}/WF instrumental F555W and F814W
219: magnitudes were derived with DAOPHOT~II, and calibrated to
220: Landolt's $V$ and $I$ with an accuracy of 0.02--0.03~mag
221: following the usual procedures (Alcock et al.~2001).
222: Nearly all of the LMC clump giants were detected
223: with very high signal-to-noise.
224: In order to check our $V$ and $I$ zero points,
225: we cross-correlated a subset of our data
226: with OGLE~II ground-based
227: photometry\footnote{{\tt http://sirius.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle/}.}
228: (Udalski et al.~2000).
229: A comparison reveals zero-point differences of $\Delta V = 0.11$
230: and $\Delta I = 0.02$~mag
231: in the sense that OGLE~II is brighter.
232: Alcock et al.~(1999)
233: compared MACHO ground-based photometry with an
234: early reduction of these same
235: standardized {\it HST\,}/WF data (a different subset),
236: and found that MACHO was brighter
237: by $\Delta V = 0.06$ and
238: $\Delta R = 0.00$ mag.
239: We speculate that the aperture corrections applied
240: to the OGLE~II and MACHO ground-based $V$ data
241: may be affected at the 5-10\% level
242: by crowding errors. For example, it is possible
243: that the $V$-band ``sky''
244: around bright stars used to determine
245: the aperture corrections was on average underestimated
246: because nearby neighbor stars were oversubtracted
247: (Alcock et al.~1999; Udalski et al.~2000).
248: We tentatively adopt a formal systematic
249: calibration error of
250: 0.02~mag in $V$ and $I$ based on the
251: stated accuracy of {\it HST\,}/WF calibrations.
252:
253:
254: \section{Analysis and Results }
255:
256: We detected approximately 36,000 stars in $K$ and
257: 109,000 stars in $V$ and $I$. Of these approximately
258: 27,000 have $K < 20$, and 7,000 have
259: $V < 21$. Cross-correlating these latter source lists
260: yields 4745 stars with $K$, $I$, and $V$ mags.
261: Figure 1 shows the resulting
262: $K$,$(V-K)$ color-magnitude diagram (CMD)
263: in the region around the red clump. Only 2353 stars appear
264: within the limits of Fig.~1, and we restrict our
265: subsequent analyses to these stars.
266: As discussed by Alves (2000; and refs.~therein), not all
267: of the stars appearing in Fig.~1 are bona~fide red clump
268: giants. The first-ascent red giant branch (RGB) is
269: identified as the roughly vertical sequence running from
270: $(V-K) \sim$ 2.2 at $K \sim 18.5$ to $(V-K) \sim$ 3.1
271: at $K \sim 14.5$. It has a width of about 0.2 mag in
272: $(V-K)$ color, and no distinct component branches are evident.
273: Some of these stars are second-ascent
274: asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. The distinction between
275: an RGB and AGB star is not necessarily clear in a CMD of
276: mixed-age field populations like this one.
277: The sought-after horizontal branch red clump
278: is the most prominent
279: feature in Fig.~1. It appears at $K \sim 17$ and lies
280: mostly blueward of the giant branch, i.e.~$(V-K) \simlt 2.4$.
281: The detailed structure of the clump seen here
282: is well understood in the context of
283: stellar evolution theory (Girardi \& Salaris 2001).
284: The overdensity of stars with $K \sim 17$ and colors
285: that associate them with the giant branch
286: (i.e.~$V-K \sim 2.4$ to 2.5) may be the first detection
287: of the ``RGB bump'' for LMC field stars
288: (see Fig.~19 of Girardi \& Salaris 2001).
289: The RGB bump
290: is an evolutionary pause as the hydrogen-burning shell
291: crosses a chemical composition discontinuity.
292: The loose clustering of stars seen on the giant branch at
293: $(V-K) \sim 2.8$ and $K \sim 15.5$ may be
294: the ``AGB bump,'' an evolutionary pause at the onset of
295: helium shell burning
296: (e.g., see Alves \& Sarajedini 1999).
297:
298:
299: A side-by-side comparison of
300: red clump luminosity functions (LFs)
301: is presented in Figure~2.
302: The LMC clump is shown on the left. The {\it Hipparcos\,}
303: clump is shown on the right (data from Alves~2000).
304: The LFs in $K$, $I$, and $V$ are each plotted
305: in separate panels (top to bottom).
306: LMC bin size is 0.05 mag; {\it Hipparcos\,}
307: bin size is 0.10 mag; each panel is 1.5~mag wide.
308: The adopted model LFs (solid lines in Fig.~2)
309: are a superposition
310: of a linear background and a Gaussian of variable width,
311: amplitude, and location.
312: The backgrounds are fit in
313: restricted magnitude ranges which exclude the clump.
314: The best-fit model parameters
315: and $\chi^2$ (per d.o.f.) are provided in Table~1.
316: The LMC red clump in Fig.~2 totals about 2000 stars.
317: For comparison, there are 238 {\it Hipparcos\,} red clump
318: stars with $K$, $I$, and $V$ data (Alves 2000).
319: This distinction reflects in the formal statistical
320: errors for the peak clump brightnesses given in Table~1.
321: Despite the shortcomings
322: of our model LFs revealed in Fig.~2,
323: the peak brightnesses of the red clumps
324: are evidently well determined.
325:
326: The {\it Hipparcos\,} calibration assumes no reddening
327: correction, as suggested by Stanek and Garnavich (1998).
328: These authors argue that the average reddening is
329: probably $E(B-V) < 0.02$~mag. It should
330: be kept in mind that the LMC distance derived in
331: this work is practically
332: independent of the reddening correction
333: applied to the {\it Hipparcos} clump.
334: However, the average LMC reddening obtained
335: in comparison may be slightly underestimated.
336: We note that the Lutz-Kelker correction to the Alves (2000)
337: calibration dataset is probably also negligible (Udalski 2000).
338: The true LMC distance modulus is therefore given by:
339: \begin{equation}
340: \mu_0 \ = \ (m-M)_{0} \ = \ (m - M)_{\lambda} \ - \
341: A_{\lambda} \ + \ \Delta M_{\lambda}
342: \end{equation}
343: where $\lambda$ corresponds to either $K$, $I$, or $V$,
344: and the apparent distance moduli in each passband are
345: $(m-M)_{\lambda}$.
346: The corrections for population
347: effects are $\Delta M_{\lambda} =
348: M_{\lambda}(Hipp.) - M_{\lambda}$(LMC)
349: following the convention of Girardi and Salaris~(2001).
350: These corrections,
351: the inverse effective wavelengths of each passband
352: ($\micron^{-1}$), and
353: the adopted reddening law ($A_{\lambda}$; Schlegel et al.~1998)
354: are all summarized in Table~1.
355: The results of this work are insensitive
356: to small uncertainties in the reddening law
357: or effective wavelengths employed.
358: Although omitted from Eqn.~1, we also apply a geometric
359: correction to our final distance estimate (see below).
360:
361:
362: We first compare the LMC and
363: {\it Hipparcos} red clumps
364: by assuming $\Delta M_{\lambda}$ = 0.
365: The resulting apparent
366: distance moduli are plotted as a function
367: of inverse effective wavelength in Figure~3
368: (open circles; error bars omitted),
369: and listed in Table~1.
370: A fit for the average
371: interstellar reddening and
372: true LMC distance modulus yields
373: $E(B-V)$ = $-0.026$ $\pm 0.014_r$
374: and $(m-M)_0$ = 18.562 $\pm 0.033_r$, which is shown
375: as the dotted line in Fig.~2. A negative
376: reddening correction is unphysical,
377: and indicates
378: a significant population difference between the LMC and
379: {\it Hipparcos} red clumps.
380: In order to account for the population difference, we appeal
381: to the theoretical calculations of Girardi and Salaris (2001).
382: These authors generated
383: artificial LMC and {\it Hipparcos}
384: red clumps from a grid of core helium-burning
385: stellar models. Each clump refers to
386: specific star formation and chemical
387: enrichment histories reported in the literature,
388: and is thus constrained at least indirectly
389: by observational data.
390: Possible systematic errors
391: associated with the zero-points of
392: the theoretical models would
393: cancel in the first order approximation,
394: because the population corrections are calculated
395: only in a relative sense.
396: This calculation predicts
397: $\Delta M_I = 0.20$~mag (\S1).
398: In a private
399: communication (L.~Girardi \& M.~Salaris~2002),
400: the same artificial clumps
401: yield population corrections of
402: $\Delta M_V = 0.30$
403: and $\Delta M_K = -0.03$ (Table~1).
404: The $K$-band absolute magnitude has the smallest correction,
405: in agreement with the trend noted by Grocholski and Sarajedini (2002).
406: The resulting modified apparent distance moduli are
407: plotted in Fig.~3 (solid circles with error bars),
408: and listed in Table~1.
409: Solving for the reddening and true distance modulus yields
410: $E(B-V)$ = 0.089 $\pm 0.015_r$ and $(m-M)_0$ = 18.506 $\pm 0.033_r$
411: (solid line in Fig.~3).
412: The excellent fit of the red clump data
413: in Fig.~3 lends indirect support to the
414: photometric zero-points adopted in this work.
415: Applying a small correction for the inclination of
416: the LMC disk and the location of our fields (\S2),
417: the true LMC distance modulus
418: is $(m-M)_0$ = 18.493 $\pm 0.033_r$.
419:
420:
421: \section{Conclusion}
422:
423:
424: We have presented new multi-wavelength luminosity functions
425: of LMC red clump stars. Our analysis yields a
426: distance modulus of $\mu_0 = 18.493 \pm 0.033_r$.
427: The $K$-band red clump
428: distance to the LMC is 49.96 $\pm$ 0.77 kpc
429: in good agreement
430: with the average published value
431: (50.1 kpc; Freedman et al.~2001).
432: We have also derived an average reddening
433: of $E(B-V)$ = 0.089 $\pm 0.015_r$.
434: For comparison, the Galactic foreground reddening in this
435: direction is $E(B-V) = 0.06 \pm 0.02$ (Oestreicher et al.~1995).
436: Our mean reddening result is consistent
437: with the foreground reddening, and this is a
438: success of the Girardi and Salaris (2001) models.
439:
440: The statistical error associated with our
441: new distance result
442: is due to the
443: {\it Hipparcos\,} calibration (3\%),
444: and measuring the LMC red clump brightnesses (1\%).
445: The overall systematic error may be comparable.
446: Our photometry is standardized with a 2\%
447: systematic uncertainty.
448: This error is also uncorrelated between $K$ and $V$ or $I$.
449: However, our zero-point checks do
450: not support this level of photometric accuracy
451: unless ground-based comparison data are
452: in some cases too bright by up to 0.1 mag.
453: We have suggested that this may be possible.
454: Uncertainties in our reddening and geometric corrections
455: contribute negligible systematic error to the distance result.
456: The systematic error due to the population correction
457: is probably also small. The worst case of making
458: no correction at all leads to a change in
459: modulus of less than 6\%. However, this also
460: yields a negative reddening correction.
461: For realistic reddenings, the population
462: correction to the true distance modulus is
463: approximately the same as the correction in the $K$-band (3\%).
464: In summary, the systematic errors in our
465: $K$-band red clump distance to the LMC are probably
466: of order 2\% (photometric calibration) and
467: 3\% (population correction), and thus comparable to the
468: statistical error obtained.
469:
470:
471: The $K$-band red clump distance to the LMC
472: is in agreement with previously reported $I$-band results (\S1).
473: The only serious discrepancy is the short distance
474: result of Udalski (2000) based on OGLE~II data.
475: Udalski (2000) finds a mean dereddened red clump brightness
476: of $I_0 = 17.944 \pm 0.014_r$ for 9 fields in the LMC halo.
477: Those fields are on average $2^{\circ}.12$ from the center of the LMC,
478: nearly perpendicular to the line-of-nodes, and
479: on the {\it near} side of the inclined disk (van~der~Marel et al.~2002).
480: Correcting for the 0.02 mag zero-point offset between OGLE~II
481: and our {\it HST\,}/WF data, and for geometric projection,
482: the Udalski (2000) red clump brightness becomes $I_0 = 18.024$ mag
483: (at LMC center).
484: For comparison, our dereddened red clump brightness
485: (Table~1) corrected to the
486: LMC center is $I_0 = 18.019$ mag. The results of this work,
487: Udalski (2000), and Romaniello et al.~(2000) therefore all agree,
488: which lends strong support to the accuracy
489: of the $K$-band red clump distance to the LMC.
490:
491:
492:
493: \begin{acknowledgements}
494:
495: D.A. acknowledges the referee, K.Z.~Stanek, for his helpful comments,
496: L.~Girardi and M.~Salaris for their communications,
497: and A.~Crotts for support (grant No.~AST-00-70882).
498: D.M.~supported by FONDAP Center for Astrophysics and FONDECYT.
499: Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble Space Telescope},
500: obtained at STScI operated by AURA, Inc.~under
501: NASA contract NAS 5-26555
502: (GO proposal nos.~5901 \& 7306 to K.C.).
503: Work performed under auspices of U.S. Dept. of Energy,
504: National Nuclear Security Administration by UC-LLNL
505: (contract No.~W-7405-Eng-48).
506: Use of 2MASS data,
507: a joint project of the Univ.~of Mass.~and
508: IPAC/Caltech funded by NASA and the NSF is acknowledged.
509:
510: \end{acknowledgements}
511:
512:
513:
514: \clearpage
515: \begin{references}
516:
517: \reference{}{ Alcock, C. et al.~1999, PASP, 111, 1539 }
518: \reference{}{ Alcock, C. et al.~2001, ApJ, 552, 582 }
519: \reference{}{ Alves, D.R. 2000, ApJ, 539, 732 }
520: \reference{}{ Alves, D.R. \& Sarajedini, A. 1999, ApJ, 511, 225 }
521: \reference{}{ Freedman, W. et al.~2001, ApJ, 553, 47 }
522: \reference{}{ Girardi, L., \& Salaris, M. 2001 MNRAS, 323, 109 }
523: \reference{}{ Grocholski, A., \& Sarajedini, A. 2002, astroph/0112251 }
524: \reference{}{ Oestreicher, M.O., Gochermann, J., \& Schmidt-Kaler, T.
525: 1995, A\&AS, 112, 495 }
526: \reference{}{ Paczy\'{n}ski, B. \& Stanek, K.Z. 1998, ApJ, 494, L219 }
527: \reference{}{ Paczy\'{n}ski, B. 2001, Acta Astronomica, 51, 81 }
528: \reference{}{ Persson, S.E., Murphy, D.C., Krzeminski, W., Roth,
529: M., \& Rieke, M.J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2475 }
530: \reference{}{ Rejkuba, M., Minniti, D., Silva, D.R. \&
531: Bedding, T.~2001, A\&A, 379, 781}
532: \reference{}{ Romaniello, M., Salaris, M., Cassis, S., \& Panagia, N.
533: 2000, ApJ, 530, 738 }
534: \reference{}{ Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., \& Davis, M.
535: 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 }
536: \reference{}{ Stanek, K.Z., Garnavich, P.M. 1998, ApJ, 503, L131}
537: \reference{}{ Stanek, K.Z., Zaritsky, D., \& Harris, J. 1998, ApJ, 500, L141}
538: \reference{}{ Stetson, P. 1994, PASP, 106, 250 }
539: \reference{}{ Udalski, A., Szymanski, M., Kubiak,M., Pietrzynski, G.,
540: Wozniak, P., \& Zebrun, K. 1998 , Acta Astronomica, 48, 1 }
541: \reference{}{ Udalski, A. et al.~2000, Acta Astronomica, 50, 307 }
542: \reference{}{ Udalski, A. 2000, ApJ, 531, L25 }
543: \reference{}{ van der Marel, R., Alves, D.R., Hardy, E., \&
544: Suntzeff, N.~2002, {\tt astroph/0205161} }
545: \reference{}{ Zaritsky, D. 1999, AJ, 118, 2824 }
546:
547:
548: \end{references}
549:
550:
551: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
552: \tablewidth{12cm}
553: \tablecaption{Red Clump Data}
554: \tablehead{
555: \colhead{Quantity} &
556: \colhead{$K$} &
557: \colhead{$I$} &
558: \colhead{$V$}
559: }
560: \startdata
561: %
562: $\lambda^{-1}$ ($\micron^{-1}$) & 0.48 & 1.24 & 1.81 \\
563: $A_{\lambda}/E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{A} & 0.35 & 1.96 & 3.24 \\
564: %
565: & & & \\
566: $m_{\lambda}$ \tablenotemark{B} & $16.974\pm0.009$ & $18.206\pm0.009$ & $19.233\pm0.009$ \\
567: $\sigma_{\lambda}$ & 0.155 & 0.182 & 0.180 \\
568: $\chi^2$ & 2.2 & 2.1 & 1.6 \\
569: %
570: & & & \\
571: $M_{\lambda}$ \tablenotemark{C} & $-1.60\pm0.03$ & $-0.26\pm0.03$ & $0.73\pm0.03$ \\
572: $\sigma_{\lambda}$ & 0.28 & 0.21 & 0.21 \\
573: $\chi^2$ & 1.4 & 0.9 & 1.7 \\
574: $(m - M)_{\lambda}$ & 18.57 & 18.47 & 18.50 \\
575: %
576: & & & \\
577: $\Delta M_{\lambda}$\tablenotemark{D} & $-$0.03 & 0.20 & 0.30 \\
578: %
579: $M_{\lambda}$ & $-1.57\pm0.03$ & $-0.46\pm0.03$ & $0.43\pm0.03$ \\
580: $(m - M)_{\lambda}$ & $18.54\pm0.03$ & $18.67\pm0.03$ & $18.80\pm0.03$ \\
581: \enddata
582: \tablenotetext{A}{Adopted reddening law from Schlegel et al.~(1998), which
583: refers to the effective wavelength of each passband.}
584: \tablenotetext{B}{Peak brightness and width of the LMC clump,
585: followed by $\chi^2$ per d.o.f.~of the best-fit model luminosity function.}
586: \tablenotetext{C}{Peak brightness and width of the {\it Hipparcos\,} clump
587: (data from Alves 2000),
588: followed by $\chi^2$ per d.o.f.~of the best-fit model luminosity function.
589: The LMC apparent distance moduli based on this
590: calibration are given on the next line (see text).}
591: \tablenotetext{D}{The population correction for the LMC red clump
592: absolute magnitude calculated from theoretical models
593: (Girardi \& Salaris 2001). The modified {\it Hipparcos\,}
594: calibration is given on the next line,
595: followed by the resulting LMC
596: apparent distance moduli.}
597: \end{deluxetable}
598:
599:
600: \clearpage
601: \begin{figure}
602: \plotone{f1.eps}
603: \caption{The $K$,$(V-K)$ color-magnitude diagram
604: of the LMC red clump (2353 stars).
605: The red clump appears at $K \sim 17$ and lies
606: mostly blueward of the giant branch.
607: Error bars on the individual data points are about the
608: size of the symbols plotted (open circles) at the
609: brightness of the red clump.}
610: \end{figure}
611:
612:
613:
614: \clearpage
615: \begin{figure}
616: \plotone{f2.eps}
617: \caption{The $K$, $I$, and $V$ luminosity functions for
618: the LMC red clump are shown in the left panels (bin size 0.05 mag).
619: In the right panels, the $K$, $I$, and $V$ luminosity functions for
620: the {\it Hipparcos\,} red clump are shown (bin size 0.1 mag).
621: The best-fit model functions
622: consisting of a Gaussian and a
623: linear background are overplotted as solid lines.
624: These model fits yield
625: the peak brightness of the red clump in each passband.}
626: \end{figure}
627:
628: \clearpage
629: \begin{figure}
630: \plotone{f3.eps}
631: \caption{Apparent LMC distance moduli plotted as a function
632: of inverse effective wavelength ($\micron^{-1}$).
633: The open circles (error bars omitted)
634: are based on the {\it Hipparcos\,} calibration
635: without adjustment for population effects. The
636: best fit for the mean interstellar reddening correction and
637: true LMC distance modulus is shown as a dotted line.
638: The filled circles
639: (with error bars) are based on the {\it Hipparcos\,} calibration
640: modified for a mean population difference in the LMC.
641: The solid line through these data points shows the best-fit
642: mean interstellar reddening correction and true LMC
643: distance modulus:
644: $E(B-V) = 0.089 \pm 0.015_r$ and $(m-M)_0 = 18.506 \pm 0.033_r$. }
645: \end{figure}
646:
647:
648:
649: \end{document}
650:
651: