1: %% Helix globule paper
2: %% AASTEX 5.0
3:
4: % \documentclass{aastex}
5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
8:
9: %% -------Author macros----------------------
10:
11: \newcommand{\kms}{km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}
12: \newcommand{\Kkms}{K\thinspace km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}
13: \newcommand{\Lsun}{L$_\odot$}
14: \newcommand{\Msun}{M$_\odot$}
15:
16: %------------------------------------------------------
17:
18: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
19:
20: % \slugcomment{}
21:
22: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
23: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
24: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
25: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
26: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
27: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
28:
29: %\shorttitle{}
30: %\shortauthors{}
31:
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \title{High Resolution CO and H$_2$ Molecular Line Imaging of a
36: Cometary Globule in the Helix Nebula\altaffilmark{1} }
37:
38:
39: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
40: %% author and affiliation information.
41: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
42: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
43: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
44: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
45:
46: \author{P. J. Huggins\altaffilmark{2}, T. Forveille\altaffilmark{3,4},
47: R. Bachiller\altaffilmark{5}, P. Cox\altaffilmark{6},
48: N. Ageorges\altaffilmark{7}, J. R. Walsh
49: \altaffilmark{8} }
50:
51: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations
52: carried out with the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer. IRAM is
53: supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain).}
54: \altaffiltext{2}{Physics Department, New York University, 4 Washington
55: Place, New York, NY 10003, USA}
56: \altaffiltext{3}{CFHT, PO Box 1597, Kamuela, HI 96743, USA}
57: \altaffiltext{4}{Observatoire de Grenoble, B.P. 53X, 38041 Grenoble
58: Cedex, France}
59: \altaffiltext{5}{IGN Observatorio Astron\'omico Nacional, Apartado
60: 1143, E-28800 Alcal\'a de Henares, Spain}
61: \altaffiltext{6}{Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, Universit\'e de
62: Paris XI, 91405 Orsay, France}
63: \altaffiltext{7}{European Southern Observatory, Alonso de C\'{o}rdova
64: 3107, Santiago, Chile}
65: \altaffiltext{8}{Space Telescope Coordinating Facility, ESO, D-85748
66: Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany}
67:
68:
69:
70: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
71: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
72: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
73: %% affiliation.
74:
75: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
76: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
77: %Foundation.}
78:
79:
80:
81:
82: \begin{abstract}
83: We report high resolution imaging of a prominent cometary globule in
84: the Helix nebula in the CO $J=1-0$ (2.6~mm) and H$_2$ $v=1-0$ $S(1)$
85: (2.12~$\micron$) lines. The observations confirm that globules consist
86: of dense condensations of molecular gas embedded in the ionized
87: nebula. The head of the globule is seen as a peak in the CO emission
88: with an extremely narrow line width (0.5~\kms) and is outlined by a
89: limb-brightened surface of H$_2$ emission facing the central star and
90: lying within the photo-ionized halo. The emission from both molecular
91: species extends into the tail region. The presence of this extended
92: molecular emission provides new constraints on the structure of the
93: tails, and on the origin and evolution of the globules.
94:
95:
96:
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99:
100: \keywords{Planetary nebulae: general --
101: Planetary nebulae: individual: NGC~7293 --
102: Stars: AGB and post-AGB}
103:
104:
105: \section{Introduction}
106:
107: The cometary globules in the Helix nebula (NGC~7293) are among the
108: most remarkable structures seen in planetary nebulae (PNe). They occur
109: in large numbers in the lower ionization regions of the nebula, and
110: appear in high resolution optical images as small ($\sim 1\arcsec$),
111: convex, photo-ionized surfaces facing the central star, with
112: comet-like tails extending in the opposite direction (e.g., Meaburn et
113: al. 1992; O'Dell \& Handron 1996). These structures are seen in other
114: PNe (e.g., O'Dell et al. 2002) and are probably quite common, but they
115: are best seen in the Helix nebula because it is the nearest example,
116: at a distance of $D\sim 200$~pc ($\rm{parallax} = 4.70 \pm 0.75$~mas,
117: Harris et al. 1997).
118:
119: A key step in understanding the nature of the Helix globules has been
120: their detection in CO by Huggins et al. (1992). With a resolution
121: $\sim 12\arcsec$, the CO observations did not resolve their structure,
122: but demonstrated that globules contain a major mass component of
123: molecular gas, consistent with observations of dust, seen in
124: absorption against the nebula emission by Meaburn et al. (1992). The
125: molecular gas places important constraints on the origin and evolution
126: of the globules, and provides a direct connection with the massive
127: shell of neutral gas that surrounds the ionized nebula (Forveille \&
128: Huggins 1991; Young et al. 1999; Rodriguez, Goss, \& Williams
129: 2002). This connection is underscored by wide field imaging of the
130: nebula in the infrared lines of H$_2$ by Kastner et al. (1996), Cox et
131: al. (1998), and Speck et al. (2002), at resolutions from 8\arcsec\ to
132: 2\arcsec, that show a highly fragmented envelope.
133:
134: In order to determine the detailed relation between the molecular gas
135: and the structure of the globules revealed by optical images, we have
136: made new observations of the Helix nebula in both CO and H$_2$ with
137: significantly better resolution than previous observations. In this
138: \emph{Letter}, we report results on the molecular gas in a single
139: cometary globule that resolve its head-tail structure.
140:
141:
142:
143:
144: %__________________
145: % Figure 1 maps/image
146: %
147: %\begin{figure*}[t]
148: %\centering
149: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{fig1bw.eps}}}
150: %\caption[]{Observations of the Helix globule C1. Top row: Images in CO
151: %1--0 integrated intensity (left); H$_2$ $v=1-0$ $S(1)$ (center left);
152: %H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]\,6584\,\AA\ (center right); and dust
153: %absorption, seen against the nebula emission in [O\,{\sc
154: %iii}]\,5007\AA\ (right). Bottom row: CO 1--0 channel maps; the
155: %channels are 0.2~\kms\ wide and are centered at the velocities given
156: %in the upper right of each panel. The contour intervals are
157: %0.4~\Kkms\ for the CO integrated intensity map, and 0.9~K for the
158: %channel maps. The ellipse in the top, left panel shows the beam size
159: %for the CO observations. For each panel, the offsets are relative to a
160: %field center of 22:29:37.78 $-$20:48:02.00 (J2000) which is used for
161: %all images in the paper. }
162: %\label{}
163: %\end{figure*}
164: %------------------
165:
166:
167: \section{Observations}
168:
169: The globule observed is a prominent feature lying within the ionized
170: nebula to the north of the central star at offsets ($-$10\arcsec,
171: +135\arcsec). It is designated C1 by Huggins et al. (1992) and its
172: location is shown in Fig.~3a of Meaburn et al. (1998) where it is
173: labeled ``1''. Optical images of the globule from Walsh \& Meaburn
174: (1993) in H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]\,6584\,\AA\ and in [O\,{\sc
175: iii}]\,5007\AA, where it is seen in absorption against the nebular
176: emission, are shown in the top right panels of Fig.~1.
177:
178: The CO observations were made in the 2.6~mm (115~GHz) $J=1-0$ line
179: using the IRAM interferometer at Plateau de Bure, France, in May 1999.
180: The array consisted of five, 15~m antennas, equipped with SIS
181: heterodyne receivers. The observations were made with the D
182: configuration of the array, with maximum baselines of $\sim
183: 147$~m. The primary beam size of the interferometer is 44\arcsec\ at
184: 2.6~mm, and the effective velocity resolution for the analysis is
185: 0.2~\kms. The uv data were Fourier transformed and CLEANed, using the
186: Clark algorithm, and the restored Gaussian clean beam is $7\farcs9
187: \times 3\farcs8$, at a position angle of 14\degr. The results are
188: shown in Figs.~1 and 2.
189:
190: Images of the H$_2$ $v=1-0$ $S(1)$ emission in the northern quadrant
191: of the Helix nebula were obtained with the SOFI infrared camera on the
192: ESO NTT, in June, 2001. The instrument has a 1024$^{2}$ Hawaii HgCdTe
193: array and was used with an image scale of 0\farcs24 pixel$^{-1}$. The
194: seeing was {1}\farcs{2}. The observations were made with an H$_2$
195: filter of width 0.028~$\micron$, centered at 2.124~$\micron$, well
196: separated from the He\,{\sc i} 2$^{1}$P$_{0}$--2$^{1}$S 2.058~$\micron$ and
197: H\,{\sc i} 2.166~$\micron$ lines, the latter having a transmission of
198: a few percent in the filter passband. Fifteen 1~min exposures were
199: made, using sky offset positions at 5\arcmin~N, 5\arcmin~E, and
200: 7\arcmin~NE. The individual images were sky cleaned, flat fielded, and
201: combined with shift-and-add registration using the brightest stellar
202: images.
203:
204: Many globules are detected in the full H$_2$ image, and the region
205: around globule C1 is shown in the top, center-left panel in
206: Fig.~1. An approximate calibration has been made by comparing the
207: smoothed, full image with the data of Speck et al. (2002). The
208: intensity of the emission at the head of the globule is
209: $\sim 10^{-4}$~erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,sr$^{-1}$. Astrometry of the
210: H$_2$ and optical images was carried out using stars in the USNO
211: catalog, and the registration between the images is $\sim
212: {0}\farcs{1}$ rms. The accuracy of the absolute positions for
213: comparison with the CO interferometry is $\sim$
214: {0}\farcs{3}--{0}\farcs{5}.
215:
216:
217: \section{Properties of the Globule}
218:
219: \subsection{Overview}
220: The observations presented in Fig.~1 provide complementary views of
221: the Helix globule. The CO 1--0 line, with an upper level of $E_{\rm
222: u}=5.5$~K above the ground state, shows the overall distribution and
223: kinematics of the cool molecular gas; the high lying ($E_{\rm u}\sim
224: 7,000$~K) H$_2$ $v=1-0$ $S(1)$ line traces excited molecular gas; the
225: image in [O\,{\sc iii}] shows the distribution of dust, seen in
226: absorption against the nebular emission; and the image in
227: H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}] shows the photo-ionized surfaces facing the
228: central star.
229:
230: The observations immediately confirm the molecular nature of the globule,
231: and reveal some important details of its structure.
232:
233: %------------------
234: % Figure 2 strip map
235: %
236: %\begin{figure}[h]
237: %\vspace{0.5cm}
238: %\noindent\resizebox{6cm}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{fig2bw.eps}}}
239: %\caption[]{CO 1--0 velocity strip map of the globule along the major
240: %axis. The contour intervals are 0.5~K.
241: %}
242: %\label{}
243: %\end{figure}
244: %------------------
245:
246:
247: \subsection{CO Structure and Kinematics}
248: The CO 1--0 velocity-integrated intensity map (Fig.~1) is seen to be
249: extended with respect to the telescope beam, and the deconvolved
250: source size, assuming a Gaussian distribution, is $\sim 2\arcsec
251: \times 10\arcsec$ (1\arcsec\ corresponds to $3\times10^{15}$~cm at
252: 200~pc). The emission is marginally resolved in RA but is resolved in
253: Dec, and extends roughly along the head-tail axis of the globule. The
254: peak intensity is 2.6~K\,\kms, and the total flux is
255: 166~K\,\kms\,arcsec$^{2}$.
256:
257: The CO velocity-strip (Fig.~2) shows that to the south, toward the
258: head of the globule, the line width is extremely narrow, $\Delta V =
259: 0.5$~\kms\ (FWHM), and it broadens out to $\sim 0.8$~\kms\ farther
260: north into the tail region. The CO radial velocity is precisely
261: determined to be $V_{\rm lsr} = -27.9$~\kms\ (the correction to
262: $V_{\rm hel}$ is $-$2.9~\kms), consistent with $-28.7\pm2$~\kms\
263: measured in [N\,{\sc ii}] 6584\AA\ by Meaburn et al. (1998). The
264: systemic velocity of the whole envelope of the Helix nebula is
265: $-$23~\kms\ (Young et al. 1999), so the globule is blue-shifted by
266: $\sim 5$~\kms. For a radial expansion velocity of the globule system
267: of $\sim 20$~\kms\ (Young et al. 1999), the globule lies on the near
268: side of the nebula, on a radius vector from the star inclined to the
269: line of sight by $\sim 75\degr$. The head-tail axis, assumed radial,
270: is also seen at this angle.
271:
272: The CO channel maps (Fig.~1) show the structure in the molecular gas.
273: There are two peaks, offset 3\arcsec~N and 8\arcsec\,N from the field
274: center. The first is just north of the maximum absorption
275: in the [O\,{\sc iii}] image (centered at $1\farcs5$\,N), and we
276: identify this molecular emission with the head of the globule whose
277: photo-ionized surface toward the central star is seen in the
278: H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}] image. Substantial CO emission, however,
279: extends away from the head into the tail region, and the second CO
280: peak lies close to a second, weak maximum in the dust absorption image
281: (at 8\arcsec\,N). This extended CO emission, together with the line
282: broadening into the tail accounts for the offset of the peak in the CO
283: integrated intensity map from the head of the globule.
284:
285:
286: These observations demonstrate that the molecular gas in the cometary
287: globule is \emph{not} a compact spheroidal bullet, but
288: has a substantial component extending into the tail region.
289:
290: %------------------
291: % Figure 3 Close-up
292: %
293: %\begin{figure}[h]
294: %\hspace{0cm}\psfig{figure=bd_fig2.eps,angle=180,width=8cm}
295: %,height=16cm}
296: %\vspace{0.5cm}
297: %\noindent\resizebox{8.6cm}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{fig3bw.eps}}}
298: %\caption[]{Close-up of the head of the globule. Contours of the
299: %emission in H$_2$ $v=1-0$ S(1) (left) and H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]
300: %(right), superposed on the [O\,{\sc iii}] image. The H$_2$ data are
301: %smoothed with a Gaussian {0\farcs6} (FWHM). The contours are 0.3, 0.5,
302: %0.7, and 0.9 of the peak emission.
303: % }
304: %\label{}
305: %\end{figure}
306: %------------------
307:
308:
309:
310: \subsection{H$_2$ Distribution and Excitation}
311:
312: The distribution of the H$_2$ emission in the globule is strikingly
313: different from that of CO (see Fig.~1). The strongest H$_2$ emission
314: occurs at the face of the globule toward the central star. There is
315: little emission directly behind the globule, but observable emission
316: extends to large distances ($\gtrsim 24\arcsec$) along the
317: tail. Remarkably, the H$_2$ distribution most closely follows that of
318: the ionized gas seen in H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}].
319:
320: The high spatial resolution of our observations and the well defined
321: geometry of the globule provide a unique perspective on the question
322: of the excitation of the H$_2$ (Cox et al. 1998), which affects its
323: observed distribution. The bright H$_2$ emission clearly arises in a
324: thin surface layer in the molecular gas. Fig.~3 shows a close-up of
325: the globule head, comparing the H$_2$ and H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]
326: emission with [O\,{\sc iii}]. The H$_2$ emission forms a
327: limb-brightened cap on the globule facing the central star, and lies
328: just inside ({0}\farcs{5}--1\arcsec) the halo of photo-ionized gas
329: seen in H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]. In the tail region too (Fig.~1), the
330: H$_2$ is enhanced near two H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}] peaks, at
331: 8\arcsec\,N and 12\arcsec\,N on the east side, which are directly
332: illuminated by the star. More detailed observations are needed to
333: determine whether these are separate, small globules along the line of
334: sight, or sub-structures of the main tail.
335:
336: The observed distribution of the H$_2$ emission is in complete accord
337: with the expectations of H$_2$ excitation in a thin photo-dissociation
338: region (PDR) at the surface of the molecular gas. The observed
339: intensity of the line is probably consistent with this interpretation
340: (Natta \& Hollenbach 1998; Speck et al. 2002) although detailed PDR
341: models of the globules have not yet been developed. The possibility
342: that the observed distribution is caused by shocks is unlikely, in
343: view of the small crossing time ($\lesssim 400$~yr) for shocks
344: ($v_{\rm s} \gtrsim 5$~\kms) able to excite the $v = 1-0$ $S(1)$ H$_2$
345: line (e.g., Burton et al. 1992); shocks in the bulk of the molecular
346: gas are ruled out by the absence of any disturbance in the CO emission
347: with velocities larger than $\sim 0.5$~\kms.
348:
349:
350:
351: \subsection{Physical Properties of the Molecular Gas}
352:
353: Using the CO 2--1 observations of the globule by Huggins et
354: al. (1992), we find the 2--1/1--0 flux ratio to be $\sim$ 2--3
355: (assuming significant 1--0 flux is not resolved out on the shortest
356: baselines), which suggests that the lines are at least partly
357: optically thin, with an excitation temperature $\sim$ 18--40~K in
358: the thin limit. For a representative value of 25~K and a CO abundance
359: of $3\times10^{-4}$, the CO 1--0 flux gives a mass of molecular gas in
360: the globule of $M_{\rm m} \gtrsim 1 \times 10^{-5}$~\Msun. The
361: corresponding average density in a volume with projected dimensions of
362: $2\arcsec \times 10\arcsec$, which includes the head and the
363: tail seen in CO, is $n_{\rm H}\gtrsim 2\times 10^4$~cm$^{-3}$.
364:
365:
366: These values are consistent with a mass of $\sim 2 \times
367: 10^{-5}$~\Msun\ and $n_{\rm H} \sim 4\times 10^5$~cm$^{-3}$ determined
368: for the head of the globule by Meaburn et al. (1992) from the dust
369: absorption seen in [O\,{\sc iii}], corrected to a distance of 200~pc.
370: The typical mass of photo-ionized gas at the surface of a globule,
371: $\sim 10^{-9}$~\Msun\ (e.g., O'Dell \& Handron 1996), is negligible in
372: comparison.
373:
374:
375:
376: \section{Origins and Evolution}
377:
378: The structure and kinematics of the molecular gas in the head and in the
379: tail of the globule provide basic constraints on their origin and
380: evolution.
381:
382: One scenario for the origin of globules is that they form in the
383: atmosphere of the progenitor star and are carried out in the expanding
384: circumstellar envelope (Dyson et al. 1989). In this case, the
385: wind-swept appearance of the globules suggests a model in which
386: material from the head is swept into the tail by a radially directed
387: wind, and Dyson, Hartquist, \& Biro (1993) have shown that the wind
388: needs to be subsonic to form a narrow tail. Our observations constrain
389: this model in showing no evidence for a wind-swept flow pattern at the
390: present time. There is no difference in velocity between the CO
391: emission in the head and the tail of the globule, and from the CO
392: strip map (Fig.~2) the differential motion is $\lesssim 0.2$~\kms\
393: along the line of sight, or $\lesssim 0.8$~\kms\ in a radial
394: direction, corrected for the inclination. This would produce a tail of
395: length $\lesssim 4\arcsec$ in 5,000~yr which is likely the maximum
396: time available for such a process. The tails could have been fully
397: formed at an earlier epoch, or it might be that ablation occurs
398: only from the ionized edges of the head of the globule, but this would
399: not account for the presence of molecular gas seen in H$_2$ along the
400: whole length of the tail.
401:
402: A different view of the gas dynamics around the globule at the present
403: time is provided by the photo-evaporation model, which has been
404: discussed in the context of the Helix globules by
405: L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i}n et al. (2001). In this model, photo-ionization
406: of the neutral globule, whose molecular core is unambiguously
407: confirmed by our observations, produces an ionized out-flow
408: from the surface. Given that the density of the ionized gas at the
409: head of the globule is $\sim 10^{3}$~cm$^{-3}$, and that of the
410: ambient gas is much lower $\sim 50$~cm$^{-3}$ (e.g., O'Dell \& Handron
411: 1996), any subsonic flow of the ambient gas around the globule is
412: unlikely to have important dynamical effects in shaping the gas in the
413: tail.
414:
415: An alternative mechanism for growing a tail on a pre-existing globule
416: is by shadowing (Cant\'{o} et al. 1998), which can form a tail behind
417: the globule as the result of under-pressure of the gas in the shadowed
418: region. For the simplest case of a neutral globule in ionized gas,
419: this model produces only modest density increases in the tail, and is
420: unlikely to lead to the substantial molecular tails revealed by the
421: present observations. Striking effects of shadowing of the ionizing
422: radiation are, however, seen in optical images of the Helix (e.g.,
423: Henry, Kwitter, \& Dufour 1999), where long, radial plumes appear as
424: extensions to globules and their tails. Similar shadowing of the
425: stellar radiation at wavelengths longer than the Lyman limit must also
426: occur, and the consequent reduction of the CO and H$_2$
427: photo-dissociation rates in the shadowed regions must play a key role
428: in preserving the molecular gas in the extended tails.
429:
430: If globules originate close to the star as proposed by Dyson et
431: al. (1989), the most crucial phase in their evolution occurs when they
432: are overrun by the ionization front of the nebula. At this stage, the
433: shadowing of pre-existing molecules or hydrodynamic flows, or both,
434: could lead to globules with molecular tails. An alternative scenario
435: is one in which the globules and their tails originate simultaneously
436: in instabilities at the ionization front (e.g., Capriotti 1973). In
437: this model, shadowing and possibly hydrodynamic flows would also
438: likely play a role, and the fingers of gas which result from the
439: instability could contribute directly to the formation of the tails.
440: The later development of these two models will likely be similar, and
441: can plausibly lead to the globules with substantial molecular tails
442: that we now observe. Further studies should allow us to discriminate
443: between them.
444:
445:
446: As for the fate of the globules, Meaburn et al. (1998) estimated an
447: ablation rate for globule C1 of $3\times10^{-8}$~\Msun\,yr$^{-1}$
448: based on densities inferred from the [O\,{\sc iii}] image, and an
449: assumed ablation flow velocity of 10~\kms. This implies an improbably
450: short lifetime of $\sim 500$~yr which led Meaburn et al. to consider
451: ad hoc, restricted flow models around the globule. The absence of an
452: observable ablation flow in the globule reported here for CO ($\lesssim
453: 0.8$~\kms) completely resolves this problem, by increasing the original
454: estimate of the ablation time scale by at least an order of
455: magnitude. In fact, the current mass-loss rate of the globule is
456: likely dominated by photo-evaporation (L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i}n et
457: al. 2001), and the corresponding time scale is $\sim10^4$~yr. Thus the
458: globules are long lived, and may even escape the nebula.
459:
460:
461: % \section{Conclusions}
462:
463:
464: \acknowledgements
465: We thank the staff of the Plateau de Bure interferometer for making
466: the observations. This
467: work has been supported in part by NSF grant AST-9986159 (to P.J.H.).
468:
469:
470: %\clearpage
471:
472: \begin{references}
473:
474: \reference{}
475: Burton, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1992, \apj, 399, 563
476:
477: \reference{}
478: Cant\'{o}, J., Raga, A., Steffen, W., \& Shapiro, P. R. 1998, \apj, 502, 695
479:
480: \reference{}
481: Capriotti, E.R. 1973, \apj, 179, 495
482:
483: \reference{}
484: Cox, P., at al. 1998, \apj, 495, L23
485:
486: \reference{}
487: Dyson, J. E., Hartquist, T. W., Pettini, M., \& Smith, L. J.
488: 1989, \mnras, 241, 625
489:
490: \reference{}
491: Dyson, J. E., Hartquist, T. W., \& Biro, S. 1993, \mnras, 216, 430
492:
493: \reference{}
494: Forveille T., \& Huggins P. J. 1991, \aap, 248, 599
495:
496: \reference{}
497: Harris, H. C., Dahn, C. C., Monet, D. G., \& Pier, J. R. 1997, in IAU
498: Symp. 180, Planetary Nebulae, ed. H. J. Habing \&
499: H. J. G. L. M. Lamers (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 40
500:
501: \reference{}
502: Henry, R. B. C., Kwitter, K. B., \& Dufour, R. J. 1999, \apj, 517, 782
503:
504: \reference{}
505: Huggins, P. J., Bachiller, R., Cox, P., \& Forveille, T. 1992, \apj, 401, L43
506:
507: \reference{}
508: Kastner, J. H., Weintraub, D. A., Gatley, I., Merrill, K. M., \& Probst,
509: R. G. 1996, \apj, 462, 777
510:
511: \reference{}
512: L\'{o}pez-Mart\'{\i}n, L., Raga, A. C., Mellema, G., Henney, W. J.,
513: \& Cant\'{o}, J. 2001,
514: \apj, 548, 288
515:
516: \reference{}
517: Meaburn, J., Walsh, J. R., Clegg, R. E. S.,
518: Walton, N. A., Taylor, D., \& Berry, D. S. 1992, \mnras, 255, 177
519:
520: \reference{}
521: Meaburn, J., Clayton, C. A., Bryce, M., Walsh, J. R., Holloway, A. J.,
522: \& Steffen, W. 1998, \mnras, 294, 201
523:
524: \reference{}
525: Natta, A., \& Hollenbach, D. 1998, \aap, 337, 517
526:
527: \reference{}
528: O'Dell, C. R., \& Handron, K. D. 1996, \aj, 111, 1630
529:
530: \reference{}
531: O'Dell, C. R., Balick, B., Hajian, A. R., Henney, W. J., \& Burkert,
532: A. 2002, \aj, in press
533:
534: \reference{}
535: Rodriguez, L. F., Goss, W. M., \& Williams, R. 2002, \apj, in press
536:
537: \reference{}
538: Speck, A. K., Meixner, M., Fong, D., McCullough, P. R., Moser, D. E., \&
539: Ueta, T. 2002, \aj, 123, 346
540:
541: \reference{}
542: Walsh, J. R., \& Meaburn, J. 1993, The Messenger, 73, 35
543:
544: \reference{}
545: Young, K., Cox, P., Huggins, P. J., Forveille, T., \& Bachiller, R.
546: 1999, \apj, 522, 387
547:
548: \end{references}
549:
550:
551: \clearpage
552:
553:
554:
555:
556: %% Generally speaking, only the figure captions, and not the figures
557: %% themselves, are included in electronic manuscript submissions.
558: %% Use \figcaption to format your figure captions. They should begin on a
559: %% new page.
560:
561: \clearpage
562:
563: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
564: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
565: %% after every seventh one.
566:
567: %% There must be a \figcaption command for each legend. Key the text of the
568: %% legend and the optional \label in curly braces. If you wish, you may
569: %% include the name of the corresponding figure file in square brackets.
570: %% The label is for identification purposes only. It will not insert the
571: %% figures themselves into the document.
572: %% If you want to include your art in the paper, use \plotone.
573: %% Refer to the on-line documentation for details.
574: %%
575:
576: %%\figcaption[sgi9259.eps]{This is the first figure and it uses sgi9259.eps as
577: %%its EPS figure file. \label{fig1}}
578:
579: \figcaption[]{Observations of the Helix globule C1. Top row: Images in CO
580: 1--0 integrated intensity (left); H$_2$ $v=1-0$ $S(1)$ (center left);
581: H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]\,6584\,\AA\ (center right); and dust
582: absorption, seen against the nebula emission in [O\,{\sc
583: iii}]\,5007\AA\ (right). Bottom row: CO 1--0 channel maps; the
584: channels are 0.2~\kms\ wide and are centered at the velocities given
585: in the upper right of each panel. The contour intervals are
586: 0.4~\Kkms\ for the CO integrated intensity map, and 0.9~K for the
587: channel maps. The ellipse in the top, left panel shows the beam size
588: for the CO observations. For each panel, the offsets are relative to a
589: field center of 22:29:37.78 $-$20:48:02.00 (J2000) which is used for
590: all images in the paper. }
591: \label{}
592:
593: \vspace{0.5cm}
594:
595: \figcaption[]{CO 1--0 velocity strip map of the globule along the major
596: axis. The contour intervals are 0.5~K.
597: }
598: \label{}
599:
600: \vspace{0.5cm}
601:
602: \figcaption[]{Close-up of the head of the globule. Contours of the
603: emission in H$_2$ $v=1-0$ S(1) (left) and H$\alpha$+[N\,{\sc ii}]
604: (right), superposed on the [O\,{\sc iii}] image. The H$_2$ data are
605: smoothed with a Gaussian {0\farcs6} (FWHM). The contours are 0.3, 0.5,
606: 0.7, and 0.9 of the peak emission.
607: }
608: \label{}
609:
610: \newpage
611: \begin{figure*}
612: \plotone{f1.eps}
613: \end{figure*}
614:
615: \clearpage
616:
617: \begin{figure}
618: \epsscale{0.5}
619: \plotone{f2.eps}
620: \end{figure}
621:
622:
623: \clearpage
624:
625: \begin{figure}
626: \epsscale{0.6}
627: \plotone{f3.eps}
628: \end{figure}
629:
630: \end{document}
631:
632: %%
633: %%
634:
635: