1: \documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{Absolute Proper Motions to B $\sim 22.5$:
5: V. Detection of Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Debris in the Direction
6: of the Galactic Anticenter}
7:
8: \author{Dana I. Dinescu\altaffilmark{1,3}, Steven R. Majewski\altaffilmark{2,4}, Terrence M. Girard\altaffilmark{1}, R\'{e}ne A. M\'{e}ndez\altaffilmark{5},
9: Allan Sandage\altaffilmark{6},
10: Michael H. Siegel\altaffilmark{2,7},
11: William E. Kunkel\altaffilmark{8},
12: John P. Subasavage\altaffilmark{2},
13: and Jamie Ostheimer\altaffilmark{2}}
14:
15:
16: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8101 (dana@astro.yale.edu, girard@astro.yale.edu)}
17: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818 (srm4n@virginia.edu)}
18: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomical Institute of The Romanian Academy, Cutitul de Argint 5, RO-75212 Bucharest 28, Romania}
19: \altaffiltext{4}{David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellow, Cottrell Scholar of the Research Corporation}
20: \altaffiltext{5}{European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile}
21: \altaffiltext{6}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,
22: 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
23: \altaffiltext{7}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
24: \altaffiltext{8}{Las Campanas Observatory, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile}
25:
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: We have detected a population of predominantly blue
30: $(B-V \le 1.1)$ stars in the direction $l = 167\arcdeg, b = -35\arcdeg$
31: (Kapteyn Selected Area 71) that cannot be accounted for by
32: standard starcount models. Down to $V \sim 20$, the colors and
33: magnitudes of these stars are similar to those of the southern overdensity
34: detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at $l = 167\arcdeg, b = -54\arcdeg$,
35: and identified as stripped material from the Sagittarius dwarf
36: spheroidal galaxy.
37: We present absolute proper motions of the stars in SA 71, and
38: we find that the excess blue stars represent a distinct,
39: kinematically cooler component than the Galactic field, and
40: in reasonable agreement with
41: predictions of Sgr disruption models.
42: The density of the excess SA 71 stars
43: at $V \sim 18.8$ and $B-V \le 1.1$ is within a factor of two of the
44: density of the SDSS-south Sgr stripped material, and of that
45: predicted by the Helmi \& White disruption model.
46: Three additional anticenter fields
47: (SA 29, 45 and 118) show very good agreement with
48: standard starcount models.
49:
50:
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{Galaxy: structure --- Galaxy: halo --- galaxies: individual
55: (Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal)}
56:
57:
58:
59: \section{Introduction}
60:
61: The Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (Sgr)
62: (Ibata, Gilmore \& Irwin 1994) has drawn considerable interest
63: as a ``living'' example of the accretion process supposedly
64: responsible for the
65: creation of the outer Galactic halo.
66: Most early Sgr surveys focused
67: within $10$-$15\arcdeg$ of its
68: core (e.g., Ibata {\it et al.} 1997, hereafter I97, Mateo {\it et al.} 1998).
69: More recently,
70: Sgr-associated material has been identified farther from its main body
71: (e.g., Majewski {\it et al.} 1999, hereafter M99), and
72: it is becoming apparent that Sgr tidal debris may
73: envelop the whole Galaxy roughly along the satellite's orbit.
74: Results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
75: (SDSS) in two equatorial strips
76: (Yanny {\it et al.} 2000, hereafter Y00;
77: Ivezic {\it et al.} 2000, hereafter I00) find
78: RR Lyrae stars, blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars, and/or
79: blue stragglers (BS) in excess
80: of the Galactic population that are
81: most plausibly explained as Sgr material
82: (see Ibata {\it et al.} 2001a).
83: Newberg {\it et al.} (2002, hereafter N02) confirm the previous SDSS
84: Sgr detections with color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) showing main sequence turnoff
85: colors (MSTO) consistent with those of Sgr.
86: Similarly, Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado {\it et al.} (2001a,b;
87: collectively referred to as M01) report Sgr detections associated with
88: MSTO stars in several regions along the Sgr orbital path. Vivas {\it et al.} (2001)
89: confirm the I00 detection of
90: RR Lyrae stars in a $\sim 50$ kpc distant clump
91: at positive Galactic latitudes, while
92: Dohm-Palmer {\it et al.} (2001) and Kundu {\it et al.} (2002; K02 hereafter)
93: report giant star concentrations in the inner halo having radial velocities (RVs)
94: and distances in good agreement with wrapped tidal arms predicted from
95: Sgr disruption models. Ibata {\it et al.} (2001b) also show that
96: the carbon-star distribution from the
97: Totten \& Irwin (1998, hereafter TI98) all-sky survey
98: is highly correlated with the orbital path of Sgr.
99:
100: Here we present absolute proper motions and $B-V$
101: color distributions in Kapteyn Selected Area (SA) 71,
102: a Galactic anticenter field located close to the
103: orbital path of Sgr
104: ($ l = 167 \arcdeg, b = -35 \arcdeg$). We find
105: a population of predominantly blue stars ($ B-V \le 1.1$)
106: in excess of that
107: predicted by standard Galactic starcount models.
108: The proper motions of the excess blue stars show a distinct, kinematically
109: cooler population than the Galactic field.
110: %
111: Assuming that the excess blue stars are horizontal branch (HB) stars,
112: we estimate their distance to be $\sim 30$ kpc, a value consistent with
113: Sgr disruption model predictions (e.g., Johnston 1998, hereafter J98).
114: We also present $B-V$ color distributions for three other anticenter fields
115: (SA 29, 45 and 118). These allow us to refine some of the
116: parameters of the starcount model. These three fields are consistent with each other and agree with the global model predictions.
117: %
118: This work is a continuation of the
119: photometric and proper motion study of SA 57 by Majewski (1992) as well as
120: the Mount Wilson Halo Mapping Project (Sandage 1997).
121:
122:
123:
124: \section{The Data}
125:
126: Star catalogs are derived from typically six Mayall 4m prime focus photographic plates
127: (plate scale $18\farcs60$ mm$^{-1}$) per field:
128: two each in the $J$ (IIIa-J+GG385), $F$ (IIIa-F+GG495) and $R$
129: (127-04 + RG610) passbands. In this paper we present
130: only the $JF$ photometry data which we transform to the Johnson $BV$ system
131: (see Majewski 1992). The plates were digitized over a
132: $40\farcm3 \times 40\farcm3$ area
133: with the University of Virginia's Perkin-Elmer microdensitometer.
134: The detection of objects, derivation of various image
135: parameters and object classification were performed
136: using the FOCAS software package (Valdes 1982, 1993).
137:
138: Calibration to standard Johnson $BV$ magnitudes used
139: Mount Wilson 100-inch (MW) photoelectric
140: photometry (Sandage 1997, 2000) supplemented with:
141: CCD data for SA 71 and 118 obtained with the Swope 1m telescope
142: at Las Campanas Observatory in 2001 and in 1993 respectively,
143: Massey's (1998) SA 45 data,
144: and, for SA 29,
145: CCD photometry from the Mayall 4m and Mosaic camera.
146: From comparisons between the
147: calibrated photographic and standard photoelectric/CCD
148: magnitudes in the Johnson system,
149: we find uncertainties in
150: the calibrated magnitudes between
151: 0.05 and 0.12, and in $B-V$
152: between 0.07 and 0.15,
153: for the relevant magnitude range analyzed here.
154:
155: Object classification relied on the resolution
156: classifier described by Valdes (1982). Inspection of images and derived
157: image parameters for different classes of objects shows
158: reliable classification to $B \sim 21.2$
159: ($V \sim 20$). All fields are complete in terms of
160: object detection to $B \sim 22.5$, except
161: SA 118, which is complete to $B \sim 21.5$.
162: These ``completeness'' limits are 1.5 magnitudes above the plate limit.
163: For the deeper plates, stars brighter than $V = 17$ show varying
164: degrees of saturation, so
165: we analyze only stars within $ 17 \le V \le 20$.
166: A detailed description of the calibration and object
167: classification will be presented elsewhere.
168:
169: SA71 proper motions were determined from
170: measurement of thirteen photographic plates spanning
171: a 22-year baseline: eleven Mayall 4m plates
172: (of which six are the plates used for the
173: photometry), and two modern Du Pont 2.5m plates with two exposures
174: (short and long) each.
175: The emulsion+filter combination match the blue, visual and red passbands.
176: The seeing varies between 1 to 3 arcsec, with the
177: modern plates typically having better images.
178: The photometric catalogs served as input lists for
179: astrometric scans with the Yale PDS microdensitometer.
180: General procedures for the astrometric reduction are described elsewhere
181: (e.g., Girard {\it et al.} 1998, Dinescu {\it et al.} 2000).
182: We have made use of the double exposures on the Du Pont plates
183: to model magnitude-dependent systematics, and have corrected
184: for differential color refraction for the appropriate photographic emulsion
185: and hour angle following the prescription in Dinescu {\it et al.} (1996).
186: Inspection of galaxy proper motions
187: shows no detectable trends with colors and magnitudes.
188: We obtain a proper-motion uncertainty of
189: 0.8 mas yr$^{-1}$ per star for $V \le 19.5$, and $\sim 1$ mas yr$^{-1}$ for $V < 20.5$.
190: The correction to absolute proper motion is based on $\sim 500$
191: galaxies, but has an uncertainty of 0.2 mas yr$^{-1}$
192: due to poorer centering accuracy of the galaxy images.
193:
194:
195: \section{Results: Color Distributions and Proper Motions}
196:
197:
198: Stellar color distributions are shown in Figure 1.
199: In each panel, the total counts for the data (left numbers in
200: parentheses) and the starcount model (right numbers) are given.
201: The starcount and kinematical model used here
202: includes representations of the thin and thick disks and the halo.
203: Details of the model can be found in M\'{e}ndez \& van Altena (1996, MvA96) and
204: M\'{e}ndez \& Guzm\'{a}n (1998).
205: The ``best-fit'' model parameters were determined by eye
206: from comparisons of all
207: four fields in three $V$-magnitude bins: 17-18, 18-19, and 19-20.
208: %We use a stellar density of the disk of 0.12 stars/parsec$^3$ for
209: % $ -1.5 \le M_{V} \le 21.5$. The disk luminosity
210: %function (LF) is adopted from Stobie {\it et al.} (1989) and the
211: %Hess diagram is the one given by Robin \& Cr\'{e}z\'{e} (1986).
212: We adopt a maximum thin disk scale-height of 300 pc
213: to represent late-type main sequence stars and white dwarfs.
214: The best-fit thick disk local normalization is $6\%$ of the thin disk with
215: a 1000 pc scaleheight, with a 3.0 kpc
216: scalelength for both disks.
217: The halo is an oblate ($c/a =0.8$) de Vaucouleurs law
218: spheroid of local normalization $0.13\%$ to the thin disk.
219: The reddening for a given distance is derived
220: from the extinction
221: model presented in M\'{e}ndez \& van Altena (1998),
222: with infinite distance
223: values from the Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis (1998, hereafter SFD) maps
224: for the center of each SA field
225: (SA 29, $E_{B-V} = 0.012$; SA 45, $E_{B-V} = 0.054$; SA 71,
226: $E_{B-V} = 0.219$; and SA 118, $E_{B-V} = 0.025$).
227: The model color counts were convolved with the estimated
228: photometric $B-V$ errors.
229: Field SA 45 partly contains the galaxy M33 in the east part of the field.
230: Therefore, we have analyzed
231: the westernmost $18\farcm5 \times 40 \arcmin$ region of this field, which
232: shows no M33-contamination in the CMD.
233: For field SA71, which has the largest reddening,
234: we have also determined star counts after dereddening star-by-star
235: according to the
236: SFD maps. The comparison with model counts yields similar results to
237: when a single SA71 reddening value is applied.
238:
239: The SA 29, 45 and 118 data agree well with model
240: predictions in all three magnitude bins (slight
241: residual systematic errors may still exist in the photographic colors).
242: However, SA 71 shows a clear excess of blue stars
243: for $18 < V < 20$ compared to model predictions.
244: This excess occurs for $B-V \le 1.1$, and
245: is most prominent in the $18 < V < 19$ bin.
246:
247: In Figure 2, left panels, we show the vector point diagram (VPD) for
248: $17 < V < 20$ stars in two color groups:
249: $B-V \le 1.1$ (top panels) and
250: $B-V > 1.1$ (bottom panels).
251: The blue stars show a clump with dispersion
252: $\sim 2$ mas yr$^{-1}$ and absolute mean proper motion
253: $\mu_{l}$ cos $b = 1.4 \pm 0.3$ and $\mu_b = -0.6 \pm 0.3$ mas yr$^{-1}$
254: superimposed on a field population with wider dispersion.
255: The absolute proper-motion uncertainty is given by
256: the proper-motion measuring error for galaxies and
257: the proper-motion dispersion of the excess blue star clump.
258: The red stars show a wide proper motion distribution typical of the Galactic
259: field. Intuitively, blue field stars have a lower dispersion than
260: red ones, because red stars are predominantly (see Figure 1) nearby disk
261: K-M dwarfs, which have larger proper motions, while blue stars are
262: primarily more distant thick disk
263: and halo stars. However, the adjoining plots of
264: $\mu_l~cos~b $ (middle panels) and $\mu_b$ (right panels) distributions
265: show more complex character. The continuous
266: lines represent the proper motion distributions predicted from the
267: MvA96 Galactic model, which evidently agree
268: reasonably well with the data for the red stars, whereas the blue sample
269: shows an excess population with a lower dispersion than that of the field.
270: We have also obtained preliminary proper motions in SA 29,
271: a field located symetrically to SA 71 across the Galactic plane.
272: The SA29 proper-motion distributions do not show the excess blue star
273: population seen in SA 71.
274:
275:
276:
277: \section{What is the Excess Population?}
278:
279:
280: In Figure 3 we show in Aitoff projection
281: the location of our SA fields, most
282: known detections (filled symbols) and
283: non-detections (open symbols) of Sgr material, and the orbit of Sgr as
284: determined from the ground-based proper-motion measurement of I97
285: (continuous line).
286: SA 71 is located close to Sgr's orbit, and to a clump of five
287: carbon stars found in the surveys of TI98 and Green {\it et al.} (1994).
288: These five carbon stars belong to
289: two groups: 1) three stars with
290: $R$ magnitudes 15.1, 15.5, and 16.4 and
291: heliocentric RVs of -133, -140, and -140 km s$^{-1}$
292: respectively (highlighted crosses in Fig. 3);
293: 2) two stars with $R = 12.6$ and 13.0 and RVs
294: of 112 and 43 km s$^{-1}$ respectively.
295: Except for the faintest carbon star, which is of CH type,
296: all are N type; according to TI98,
297: the N type can be assigned an absolute magnitude
298: $M_{R} = -3.5$. Using the SFD reddening values
299: for each location of the carbon stars,
300: we obtain that the fainter group resides at distances
301: 35-44 kpc from the Sun.
302: >From the SDSS-south survey (Y00, N02), which is close to SA 71 (Fig. 3),
303: the distance to the candidate Sgr HB stars is $ \sim 28$ kpc.
304: The distances of the carbon stars and of the HB stars in
305: SDSS-south match the distances predicted for tidal debris from Sgr at this
306: Galactic location (see e.g., Helmi \& White 2001, hereafter HW01; M01).
307: Moreover, the
308: large, negative RVs
309: of three of the carbon stars (the highlighted crosses in Fig. 3)
310: also match the model predictions for
311: a stream from Sgr that consists of material lost
312: at the previous pericenter passage
313: (Sgr is currently at pericenter, see e.g, HW01,
314: Ibata {\it et al.} 2001b).
315:
316: Considering the proximity of SA 71 to directions where
317: Sgr material has been detected, we can plausibly associate the
318: excess blue stars in SA 71 with Sgr material.
319: For $18 < V < 19$
320: the excess stars peak at $B-V \sim 1.0$ ($[B-V]_0 = 0.78$)
321: a color consistent with Sgr's HB/red clump
322: (Bellazzini, Ferraro \& Buonanno 1999).
323: >From inspection of the SA 71 CMD, we adopt $V \sim 18.8$ as the
324: magnitude of the candidate Sgr HB, corresponding to
325: a heliocentric distance of 29-32 kpc (the distance range
326: derives from the absolute magnitude spread for
327: RR Lyrae stars of metallicities relevant to Sgr).
328: %Considering 1) three values of the metallicity
329: %[Fe/H] = -1.3, -1.0, and -0.5, that broadly
330: %cover the range in metallicity found for Sgr stars;
331: %2) current HB models that give the absolute visual magnitude
332: %$M_{V,HB} = 0.58$, 0.68 and 0.83 respectively for these
333: %[Fe/H] values, and 3)
334: %the SFD value of the reddening at the field center,
335: %we obtain
336: %a distance with respect to the Sun of 29-32 kpc.
337: %Here, the mean $M_{V,HB}$ was derived for HB stars redder
338: %than or inside the RR Lyrae instability strip from the
339: %synthetic HB models presented by Catelan,
340: %Ferraro, \& Rood (2001), ($Z = 0.001$, M3-like HB morphology),
341: %Catelan et al. (2001)
342: %($Z = 0.002$, NGC~362-like HB morphology) and M. Catelan (2001, private
343: %communication: $Z = 0.006$,
344: %predominantly red HB morphology). In all cases, a main-sequence
345: %helium abundance $Y_{\rm MS} = 0.23$ was assumed.
346: The estimated distance to the candidate Sgr HB is in agreement
347: with those of the carbon stars, the HB stars found in
348: SDSS-south, and model predictions (HW01, M01).
349: The excess population with $19 < V < 20$
350: is bluer than that with $18 < V <19$, and
351: resembles the BS population found in Y00 and N02.
352:
353:
354: From kinematics of tidal stream material calculated with the
355: semianalytical disruption model developed by J98 for Sgr and
356: the measured orbit by I97, we find the nearest
357: model Sgr stripped material to SA71 is at
358: $l = 174\arcdeg, b = -37\arcdeg$. This material belongs to a trailing stream
359: that emerged during the previous perigalacticon passage (0.75 Gyr ago).
360: The debris is located 26 kpc from the Sun,
361: and has $\mu_l~cos~b = 1.47$ mas yr$^{-1}$,
362: $\mu_b = -1.67$ mas yr$^{-1}$, and $V_{rad} = -134$ km s$^{-1}$.
363: The vertical lines
364: in the proper-motion distributions of Fig. 2 represent these predicted
365: proper motions (all are presented in the heliocentric rest frame).
366: To understand better the debris motion,
367: we subtract the reflex solar motion from our
368: SA 71 proper-motion measurement, at a distance of
369: 26 kpc. We obtain
370: $(\mu_l~cos~b)' = -0.47 \pm 0.30 $ mas yr$^{-1}$, and $\mu_b' = -0.35 \pm 0.30
371: $ mas yr$^{-1}$.
372: For the model predictions we obtain
373: $(\mu_l~cos~b)' = -0.43 $ mas yr$^{-1}$, and $\mu_b' = -1.55$ mas yr$^{-1}$.
374: While there is good agreement in $\mu_l~cos~b$, the
375: predicted value of $\mu_b$ is larger in absolute
376: value than that measured.
377: This discrepancy may be due to uncertainties
378: in the model predictions stemming from the
379: 0.7 mas yr$^{-1}$ uncertainty in the
380: proper motion of Sgr (I97), and/or it may be due to
381: undetected systematics in our proper-motion measurement.
382: A full exploration of models with varying initial conditions
383: may help understand this
384: discrepancy, but is beyond the purpose of this letter.
385: Given the almost polar orbit of Sgr (the latitude of the pole is
386: $b = 13\arcdeg$, Ibata {\it et al.} 2001b),
387: one might want to compare the direction of our measured velocity vector
388: to that estimated from orbit-shape considerations only.
389: However, we caution that, given the small size of the measured proper motion
390: compared to its uncertainty,
391: the direction is rather poorly constrained.
392: A small-size latitudinal motion
393: is quite conceivable because debris in this particular stream reaches its
394: turning point below the Galactic plane at a Galactic location close to
395: that of SA 71 (see e.g., Fig. 3 in Ibata {\it et al.} 2001b).
396:
397: Assuming a 1.7 mas yr$^{-1}$ lower limit
398: for the proper-motion dispersion
399: (as given by the $\mu_b$ distribution of the excess blue stars),
400: and an 0.8 mas yr$^{-1}$ measurement uncertainty,
401: we obtain a 213 km s$^{-1}$ intrinsic velocity dispersion of the clump of blue stars
402: at 30 kpc. This dispersion is too large for a coherent structure to last for
403: 0.75 Gyr.
404: It is more plausible that we sample material lost in several
405: previous passages that is located at various distances, and thus has
406: a wide range in kinematics.
407: The existence of multiple, overlapping Sgr streams is suggested by
408: M99, Dinescu et al. (2000), Dohm-Palmer et al. (2001), and K02.
409: An alternative or additional explanation is that Galactic thick disk
410: stars contaminate our blue sample and thereby inflate the estimated
411: dispersion (see Fig. 2).
412: As shown by K02, radial velocities can help disentangle
413: streams left by previous Sgr passages,
414: (if this interpretation is correct) and also help separate
415: field stars from Sgr candidates.
416:
417:
418:
419: The largest excess of blue stars is at $18 < V < 19$.
420: The difference between the data and the starcount model
421: for stars with $B-V \le 1.1$ is $47 \pm 15$, yielding a density of
422: $0.029 \pm 0.009$ star arcmin$^{-2}$.
423: For the SDSS-south detection, N02 estimate a density three times
424: lower than that of SDSS-north. N02 find 500 red clump stars in the
425: SDSS-north along an orbital path of $4.4\arcdeg$. For our $40\farcm3$ field,
426: the SDSS-south
427: %linear
428: density implies 25 red clump stars, or
429: $\sim 2$ times lower than our determination.
430: HW01 predict a rather high density of Sgr material at
431: $l = 179\arcdeg, b = -35\arcdeg$, a location close to SA 71. They
432: derive a density relative to the main body of Sgr
433: of $\sim 0.005$ number-counts arcdeg$^{-2}$.
434: If the main body of Sgr
435: contains 34,000 red HB stars (Ibata, Gilmore and Irwin [1995] find 17,000
436: red clump stars within the
437: half-mass radius of the main body of Sgr), then we should find 77 red HB
438: stars in our SA71
439: area, according to the HW01
440: model. This number is also within a factor of 2 of
441: our excess counts.
442:
443: %We note that an inspection of the reduced proper-motion
444: %diagram (an optimal tool to detect a kinematically coherent population that
445: %has a line of sight depth of the order of its mean distance, see Majewski
446: %1999) did not reveal a well defined sequence representative of the HB for
447: %instance, or tracing an isochrone.
448: In the future, we plan to supplement this analysis with deeper, more accurate
449: photometry, radial velocities and with detailed modeling of the dynamical
450: evolution of Sgr.
451:
452:
453: We thank M. Catelan for providing us HB models,
454: M. Irwin for making available
455: the carbon star data, and A. Helmi and K. Johnston for
456: discussions concerning the Sgr disruption models.
457: SRM thanks the Carnegie Observatories
458: for access to Las Campanas facilities.
459: This research was supported by the NSF under grant AST 97-02521.
460:
461:
462: \newpage
463:
464: \begin{references}
465:
466: \reference{} Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., \& Buonanno, R. 1999, \mnras, 304, 633
467: Fusi Pecci, F., \& Galleti, S. 2001a, \aj, 122, 3171
468: \reference{} Dinescu, D. I., Girard, T. M., van Altena, W. F.,
469: Yang, T. -g., \& Lee, Y. -W. 1996, \aj, 111, 1205
470: \reference{} Dinescu, D. I., Majewski, S. R., Girard, T. M., \&
471: Cudworth, K. M. 2000, \aj, 120, 1892
472: \reference{} Dohm-Palmer, R. C., Helmi, A., Morrison, H., Mateo, M.,
473: Olszewski, E. W., Harding, P., Freeman, K. C., Norris, J., \& Shectman, S. A.
474: 2001, \apj, 555, L37,
475: \reference{} Girard, T. M., Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., van Altena, W. F., \& L\'{o}pez, C. E. 1998, \aj, 115, 855
476: \reference{} Green, P. J., Margon, B., Anderson, S. F., \& Cook, K. H. 1994,
477: \apj, 434, 319
478: \reference{} Helmi, A., \& White, S. D. M. 2001, \mnras, 323, 529 (HW01)
479: \reference{} Ibata, R., Gilmore, G., \& Irwin, M. J. 1994, Nat, 370, 194
480: \reference{} Ibata, R., Gilmore, G., \& Irwin, M. J. 1995, \mnras, 277, 781
481: \reference{} Ibata, R., Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G., Irwin, M. J.,
482: \& Suntzeff, N. B. 1997 \aj, 113, 634 (I97)
483: \reference{} Ibata, R., Irwin, M., Lewis, G. F., \& Stolte, A. 2001a, \apjl, 547, 133
484: \reference{} Ibata, R., Lewis, G. F., Irwin, M., Totten, E., \& Quinn, T. 2001b,
485: \apj, 551, 294
486: \reference{} Ivezic, Z., et al. 2000 \aj, 120, 963 (I00)
487: \reference{} Johnston, K. V. 1998, \apj, 495, 297 (J98)
488: %\reference{} Johnston, K. V., Majewski, S. R., Siegel, M. H., Reid,I. N.,
489: %\& Kunkel, W. E. 1999, \apj, 118, 1719
490: \reference{} Kundu, A., {\it et al.} 2002, \apjl, submitted (K02).
491: %\reference{} Layden, A. C., \& Sarajedini, A. 2000, \apj, 119. 1760
492: \reference{} Majewski, S. R. M. 1992, \apjs, 78, 76
493: \reference{} Majewski, S. R., Siegel, M. H., Kunkel, W. E., Reid, I. N.,
494: Johnston, K. V., Thompson, I. B., Landolt, A. U., \& Palma, C. 1999,
495: \aj, 118, 1709 (M99)
496: %\reference{} Majewski, S. R., 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 165,
497: %The Third Stromlo Symposium: The Galactic Halo, ed. B. K. Gibson, T. S. Axelrod, \& M. E. Putman, 76
498: \reference{} Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado, D., Aparicio, A.,
499: G\'{o}mez-Flechoso, M. A. \& Carrera, R., 2001a, \apj, 549, L199 (M01)
500: \reference{} Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado, D., G\'{o}mez-Flechoso, M. A., \&
501: Aparicio, A. 2001b, in ASP Conf. Ser.,
502: Observed HR Diagrams and Stellar Evolution,
503: ed. T. Lejeune \& J. Fernandes (M01)
504: \reference{} Massey, P. 1998, \apj, 501, 153
505: \reference{} Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W. \& Morrison, H. L. 1998, \apj,
506: 505, L55
507: \reference{} M\'{e}ndez, R. A., \& van Altena, W. F. 1996, \aj, 112, 655
508: \reference{} M\'{e}ndez, R. A., \& van Altena, W. F. 1998, \aaps, 330, 910
509: \reference{} M\'{e}ndez, R. A., \& Guzm\'{a}n, R. 1998, \aaps, 333, 106
510: %
511: % SRM: Why is there an extra Yanny in next ref?
512: %
513: %\reference{} Newberg, H. J., Yanny, B., et al. 2002, \apj, 569, 245
514: \reference{} Newberg, H. J., et al. 2002, \apj, 569, 245 (N02)
515: \reference{} Sandage, A. 1997, \pasp, 109, 1197
516: \reference{} Sandage, A. 2001, \pasp, 113, 267
517: \reference{} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
518: \reference{} Totten, E. J. \& Irwin, M. J. 1998, \mnras, 294, 1
519: \reference{} Valdes, F. 1982, in Instrumentation in Astronomy IV,
520: S.P.I.E. Proceedings, Vol. 331
521: \reference{} Valdes, F. 1993, FOCAS User's Guide, NOAO document
522: (ftp://iraf/noao.edu/iraf/docs/focas/focasguide.ps.Z)
523: \reference{} Vivas, A. K., et al. 2001, \apj, 554, L33
524: \reference{} Yanny, B., et al. 2000, \apj, 540 825 (Y00)
525: \end{references}
526:
527:
528:
529: \newpage
530:
531:
532: \begin{figure}
533: \caption{$B-V$ color distributions for SA 29, 45, 71 and 118 compared to model
534: predictions.
535: %All panels are on the same scale, and the ordinate represents
536: %the number of stars per 0.15 color bin. Star counts = sum of Ps.
537: The total model distribution is represented with
538: the thick line. The star counts of each Galactic component
539: are also shown with thin lines. The thin disk dominates the star counts, with
540: smaller contributions from the thick disk and halo.
541: The numbers in each parenthesis represent the data/model counts.
542: }
543: \end{figure}
544:
545:
546: \begin{figure}
547: \caption{VPD (left panels) of stars between $V = 17 - 20$,
548: and separated into two groups: blue ($B-V \le 1.1$; top panels)
549: and red ($B-V > 1.1$; bottom panels).
550: The middle and right panels show the proper-motion distributions
551: in $\mu_l~cos~b$ and $\mu_b$ respectively
552: compared to model predictions.
553: %The distributions are plotted on the same scale, and the ordinate
554: %represents the number of stars per 1 mas yr$^{-1}$ bin.
555: The vertical lines represent the
556: predicted proper motion of a trailing tidal stream as calculated
557: with the J98 disruption model (see text).}
558: \end{figure}
559:
560: \begin{figure}
561: \caption{Aitoff projection of current detections (filled symbols) and
562: associated non-detections (open symbols) of Sgr material. The projected orbit
563: is represented with a continuous line. The dotted line
564: represents the Galactic plane. Symbols are explained in the legend.}
565: \end{figure}
566:
567: \end{document}
568:
569:
570:
571:
572:
573: