astro-ph0206312/ms.tex
1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: 
5: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ}
6: 
7: \shorttitle{Diffuse X-ray emission from NGC~2403 discovered with Chandra}
8: \shortauthors{Fraternali, Cappi, Sancisi, Oosterloo}
9: 
10: \begin{document}
11: 
12: \title{Diffuse X-ray emission from the spiral galaxy NGC~2403 discovered with Chandra}
13: 
14: \author{Filippo Fraternali}
15: \affil{Osservatorio Astronomico, via Ranzani 1, 40127, Bologna, Italy}
16: \email{ffratern@ira.bo.cnr.it}                                 
17:                 
18: \author{Massimo Cappi}
19: \affil{Istituto TeSRE (CNR), via Gobetti 101, 40129, Bologna, Italy}
20: \email{mcappi@tesre.bo.cnr.it}
21: 
22: \author{Renzo Sancisi}
23: \affil{Osservatorio Astronomico, via Ranzani 1, 40127, Bologna, Italy} 
24: \affil{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, The
25: Netherlands}
26: \email{sancisi@bo.astro.it}                                    
27:                 
28: \author{Tom Oosterloo}
29: \affil{ASTRON,  P.O. Box 2, 7990 AA, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands}
30: \email{oosterloo@nfra.nl}                                      
31: 
32: 
33: 
34: \begin{abstract}
35: {
36: We have detected diffuse soft X-ray emission (0.4$-$1 keV) from the
37: disk of the spiral galaxy NGC~2403 with {\it Chandra}. 
38: This diffuse emission (with a total luminosity of 
39: 2.1 $\times$ 10$^{38}$ erg
40: s$^{-1}$ and a gas temperature of 2$-$8 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ K) 
41: is well separated from the numerous bright point sources. 
42: NGC~2403 is a luminous spiral galaxy with a high rate of star formation. }
43: Recent H~{\small I} observations have revealed 
44: an extended H~{\small I} halo with anomalous velocities and a
45: general inflow towards the central regions of the galaxy. 
46: This result and the present detection of a diffuse, hot X-ray
47: emitting gas point at a very active disk-halo connection
48: and galactic fountain types of phenomena.
49: \end{abstract}
50: 
51: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC~2403) --- galaxies: ISM --- galaxies:
52: structure --- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics} 
53: 
54: 
55: \section{Introduction}
56: 
57: Before the launch of {\it Chandra} the study of diffuse X-ray emission
58: from normal (non-starburst) spiral galaxies was seriously impeded
59: by lack of spatial resolution \citep{fab89}.
60: The point sources could not be well separated from the diffuse thermal gas.
61: The detection of diffuse emission from the disk of spiral galaxies was therefore
62: only possible for some nearby objects
63: (e.g.\ M~33: \citet{lon96}; M~101: \citet{sno95}; M~51: \citet{ehl95}).
64: Coronal (halo) emission was observed in some nearby
65: edge-on spiral galaxies like NGC~891 \citep{bre97} and NGC~4631 \citep{wan95, wan01}.
66: Also the diffuse component of the hot thermal plasma in the Milky Way has been
67: studied extensively (e.g. \citet{kan97, val98}).
68: 
69: Here we present {\it Chandra} observations of the spiral galaxy NGC~2403
70: that made it possible to unambiguously separate discrete sources from diffuse
71: emission. 
72: This galaxy is a nearby Sc spiral, morphologically similar to M~33,
73: viewed at an inclination angle of $\sim$~60$^{\circ}$.
74: It is well isolated on the sky and shows no signs of recent interactions.
75: H~{\small I} observations \citep{fra02} have revealed
76: a kinematically anomalous component of neutral gas. 
77: The H~{\small I} position-velocity (p-v) diagram along the major axis of this galaxy
78: (Figure~\ref{fig1}) shows systematic asymmetries in the
79: form of wings in the line profiles at lower velocities 
80: with respect to the rotation curve (white squares).
81: In the central part of the galaxy such wings extend up to 150 km s$^{-1}$
82: from the rotation curve.
83: This kinematical pattern is different from that expected for a thin cold disk
84: of H~{\small I} (see the model in the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig1}).
85: This anomalous gas was previously unknown.
86: It has not been detected before, mainly because of lack of sensitivity 
87: of the observations.
88: 
89: A detailed analysis of the H~{\small I} data of NGC~2403 has shown that 
90: the wings of H~{\small I} are produced by gas (the ``anomalous gas'')
91: located above the plane of the galaxy
92: and rotating $\sim$~20$-$50 km~s$^{-1}$ more slowly than the gas in the disk.
93: A similar slower rotation of the ``halo'' gas had already been observed in the
94: edge-on galaxy NGC~891 \citep{swa97}.
95: The anomalous gas in NGC~2403
96: extends out to $\sim$ 15 kpc from the centre of the galaxy and
97: has a total mass of about 3 $\times$ 10$^8$ 
98: $M_{\odot}$ ($\sim$~1/10 of the total H~{\small I} mass). 
99: The study of its velocity field has also revealed 
100: a probable large-scale radial inflow (10$-$20 km~s$^{-1}$) towards the centre of
101: the galaxy \citep{fra01}.
102: 
103: A possible interpretation is that of a {\it galactic fountain} \citep{sha76, bre80} and
104: the observed neutral gas may be the result of cooling of ionised gas blown up
105: from the disk into the halo.
106: The discovery of hot X-ray emitting gas from the disk of NGC~2403, reported here, 
107: supports this picture.
108: The anomalous H~{\small I} may be related to the hot X-ray gas.
109: 
110: 
111: \section{Observations}
112: 
113: NGC~2403 was observed with {\it Chandra} in April 2001 for a total time of
114: 36~ks. 
115: The galaxy was centred on the ACIS-S3 CCD with an Y-offset of about 1$'$
116: from the nominal pointing of the chip to better fit in the
117: $\sim$~8$'\times$8$'$ field. 
118: The S3 chip (back illuminated) was chosen because of the higher sensitivity in
119: the soft X-ray band. 
120: The on-axis {\it Chandra} spatial resolution is $\sim$ 1$''$ corresponding to
121: 15 pc at NGC~2403 (we adopted the distance of 3.18 Mpc from
122: \citet{mad91}). 
123: The orientation of the telescope was chosen in such a way that the diagonal of
124: the chip was parallel to the major axis of the galaxy.
125: The data were reduced and analyzed with the packages CIAO (version 2.1) and
126: XSPEC (version 11.0.1). 
127: We removed high background time by excluding events exceeding $\pm$~3~$\sigma$ 
128: the mean chip count rate. 
129: The resulting exposure time of the observation was 34.9 ks. 
130: The energy range was restricted to 0.4$-$10 keV. 
131: 
132: Figure~\ref{fig2} shows the optical (DSS) and $Chandra$ images of NGC~2403.
133: In the soft (0.4$-$1 keV) X-ray image (upper right panel) an adaptive
134: smoothing 
135: was applied to the original data after the background subtraction. 
136: The background was subtracted using deep blank-field datasets 
137: with the
138: same focal plane temperature as NGC~2403 observations ($-$120~$^{\circ}$C).
139: The bottom panels of Figure~\ref{fig2} show two 5$''$ smoothed S3 images in the
140: soft (left, 0.4$-$1 keV) and hard (right, 1$-$10 keV) bands without background
141: subtraction.
142: These images show numerous discrete X-ray sources located in the bright part
143: of the stellar disk of NGC~2403.
144: The adaptively smoothed image also shows the presence of diffuse emission in
145: the soft X-ray band.
146: 
147: 
148: \subsection{Discrete sources}
149: 
150: Discrete X-ray sources were detected in NGC~2403 using CIAO {\it wavdetect}
151: on the full resolution S3 image.
152: We used a threshold of 10$^{-6}$ (4.7 $\sigma$ level, or less than 0.25
153: false detections per chip).
154: We looked for sources of different sizes, from 1$''$ to 16$''$, to
155: detect both point and extended sources and in different energy bands to detect 
156: both soft and hard sources.
157: A total of 41 sources were found in the field of the S3 CCD.
158: Assuming a standard (kT $\sim$ 5 keV)
159: spectrum, the faintest source has an X-ray flux of $\approx$~10$^{-15}$erg 
160: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ or a luminosity of $\approx$~10$^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ at the 
161: distance of NGC~2403.
162: 
163: Some of these sources are probably background sources unrelated to NGC 2403.
164: On the basis of the ROSAT Log($N$)$-$Log($S$) \citep{has98},
165: at the above flux limit and considering the shadowing by the galaxy (with a
166: typical H~{\small I} column density of 0.5$-$1 $\times$ 10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$),
167: we estimate about 5$-$10 background sources in our S3 chip.
168: 
169: The majority of the detected sources are unresolved and show emission in the
170: hard band.
171: Those for which a spectral analysis was possible show binary-type spectra. 
172: Three sources are extremely bright with observed fluxes (0.4$-$10 keV) 
173: of 4.3 $\times$ 10$^{-13}$, 6.2 $\times$ 10$^{-13}$, and
174: 1.1 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.
175: If they belong to the galaxy their luminosities are
176: 5.2 $\times$ 10$^{38}$, 7.1 $\times$ 10$^{38}$, and 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{39}$
177: erg~s$^{-1}$ (see also \citet{kot00}).
178: These sources have luminosities and spectra typical of the class of the Ultra 
179: Luminous X-ray Sources found in several nearby galaxies \citep{kin01}.
180: Most of the X-ray sources of NGC~2403 are inside the stellar disk, tracing  
181: the spiral pattern of the galaxy.
182: This suggests a relation with the stellar population I 
183: as found for other late-type spiral galaxies (e.g.\ M~33, \citet{lon96}). 
184: Three sources coincide with bright H~{\small II} regions and are clearly 
185: resolved in the {\it Chandra} images (Figure~\ref{fig2}).
186: 
187: 
188: \section{Diffuse emission}
189: 
190: Point sources (except the 3 H~{\small II} regions) were removed from the full
191: resolution {\it Chandra} data of NGC~2403 by masking elliptical areas around
192: each source.
193: Each elliptical area found by {\it wavdetect} (3 $\sigma$ of the PSF) was
194: visually inspected in order to enlarge, if necessary, the masking area.
195: Pixels inside the ellipses were filled by local background values (Poisson method
196: in $dmfilth$).
197: Figure~\ref{fig3} (left) shows the exposure-corrected 
198: X-ray {\it Chandra} image in the soft band (0.4$-$1
199: keV) after the subtraction of the point sources (H~{\small II} regions excluded) 
200: and smoothed to a resolution of 15$''$. 
201: The contribution to the diffuse emission from sources under the detection limit
202: can be estimated from the luminosity function.
203: We obtained the luminosity function from the log($N$)$-$log($S$) calculated
204: for the 38 point sources and assuming a standard spectrum for X-ray binary
205: with $\Gamma$ = 1.6 \citep{ten01}.
206: The best power-law fit for luminosities above 2 $\times$ 10$^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ 
207: is $N(>L)=38.04~ L_{36}^{-0.61}$ where $N(>L)$
208: is the number of the sources above a given luminosity limit
209: and $L_{36}$ is the luminosity in units of 10$^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$. 
210: From this function we estimate the contribution of sources under the detection
211: limit to be lower than about 5\%.
212: 
213: Therefore the X-ray emission in Figure~\ref{fig3} is most likely 
214: produced by truly hot interstellar gas.
215: The right panel of Figure~\ref{fig3} shows, for comparison, 
216: an H${\alpha}$ line image of NGC~2403 taken from the archive of the CFH
217: Telescope.
218: The distributions of H$\alpha$ and X-ray emission are very similar and the
219: main features agree in position very well. 
220: The hot gas seems to follow the spiral structure suggesting that most of 
221: this emission comes from the disk of NGC~2403 and is related to the star
222: formation (e.g. see \citet{tru91}).
223: The emission from the halo, that is expected to be uniform, is not dominant here.
224: 
225: The spectrum of the diffuse emission was extracted with the
226: software packages {\it calcrmf} and {\it calcarf} provided by A.
227: Vikhlinin\footnote{http://asc.harvard.edu/cont-soft/software/calcrmf.1.08.html}.
228: The response matrices were determined from the FITS embedded
229: function response file FP$-$120 for the operating temperature of $-$120~$^{\circ}$C. 
230: The spectrum was obtained from an elliptical region of diameter 8$'$ with the 
231: same position angle (p.a.=124$^{\circ}$) as the disk of NGC~2403.
232: In order to perform a spectral analysis a careful estimate of the background is needed.
233: We extracted two background spectra:
234: the first was extracted from the same elliptical region as that of the
235: galaxy on the blank field data;
236: the second was obtained from an elliptical region (about 4$'$ diameter)
237: in the upper left corner of our S3 chip.
238: The two backgrounds are similar in the soft (0.4$-$1 keV) band
239: (1.0 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ and 1.2 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ cts s$^{-1}$ pix$^{-1}$
240: for the first and the second respectively) while above 1 keV the
241: background of our S3 field is higher (by a factor 2)
242: than the one of the blank field.
243: This difference is not caused by background variations within the chip.
244: We tested this by extracting backgrounds from different regions across the
245: blank field chip and finding no significant variations.
246: The contamination of our S3 background by the galaxy is also excluded because
247: the differences show up in the spectral region (1$-$2 keV) in which the
248: galactic emission is much weaker.
249: Besides, we also extracted a third background from an elliptical region on the S1
250: chip (back illuminated) and found it very similar to the S3 one.
251: Therefore there is probably a slighly intrinsic difference between the background
252: during our observations and that on the blank field above 1 keV.
253: This could be caused by a local anisotropy in the pointing direction or by a
254: different instrumental noise.
255: In the following spectral analysis we preferred to use the background obtained 
256: from our S3 chip.
257: 
258: Figure~\ref{fig4} shows the spectrum of the X-ray emission of NGC~2403 after
259: the subtraction of point sources in the band 0.4$-$2 keV.
260: A fit with a Mekal thermal plasma model \citep{mew86} with one component gives
261: a temperature of kT $\simeq$ 0.25$\pm$0.1 keV (T $\simeq$ 2.9 $\times$ 10$^6$ K) with a
262: ${\chi_r}^2$=1.72.
263: Better one-component fits (${\chi_r}^2~\simeq$ 1.5)
264: are obtained with a 0.1 solar abundance or an under-abundance
265: of alpha elements (O, Mg, Si, Ca) of about 0.3 solar.
266: A significantly better fit (${\chi_r}^2 \sim$ 1), solid line in Figure~\ref{fig4},
267: is obtained with two components at temperatures kT$_1\simeq$ 0.18$\pm$0.03 keV
268: (T $\simeq$ 2.1 $\times$ 10$^6$ K) and kT$_2\simeq$ 0.73$\pm$0.07 keV (T $\simeq$ 8.4 $\times$
269: 10$^6$ K) and absorption column density fixed to the galactic value of
270: 4.1 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.
271: Given the poor statistics, the metal abundances are substantially 
272: unconstrained giving acceptable results 
273: for values from 0.1 to 1 solar (see also \citet{dah00}).
274: In the fit in Figure~\ref{fig4} the abundances are fixed to 0.3 solar.
275: The ``emission line'' at about 1.8 keV is due to a known strong instrumental background 
276: feature\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/contrib/maxim/bg/index.html\#spec},
277: not completely subtracted. 
278: 
279: The total observed flux of the diffuse emission (0.4$-$2 keV) is 1.77 $\times$
280: 10$^{-13}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ 
281: (total luminosity of 2.14 $\times$ 10$^{38}$
282: erg s$^{-1}$). 
283: This value corresponds to about 3\% of the total X-ray luminosity from
284: NGC~2403 and 
285: is similar to that of 1 $\times$ 10$^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ found with ROSAT
286: for M~33 \citep{lon96}. 
287: The total de-absorbed luminosity is L$_X$=2.66 $\times$ 10$^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
288: The relative contributions of the soft and hard components to the total
289: luminosity are about equal
290: (L$_{soft}$/L$_{hard}~\sim$ 1 
291: corresponding to a ratio of the counts rates of
292: cts$_{soft}$/cts$_{hard}~\sim~$1.4).
293: 
294: 
295: 
296: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
297: 
298: We have detected diffuse soft X-ray emission from the disk of the spiral
299: galaxy NGC~2403. 
300: The X-ray emission is strongly associated with the H~{\small II} regions 
301: and is most likely produced by hot gas from stellar winds and
302: expanding supernova shells within the disk of the galaxy. 
303: If we assume a rate of supernova explosions of 0.01 events yr$^{-1}$ for NGC~2403
304: \citep{mat97} and a mean energy release per supernova of 10$^{51}$
305: erg we estimate that the total amount of energy released by supernovae is
306: $\sim$~3 $\times$ 10$^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
307: This is much larger than the observed X-ray luminosity (2.1
308: $\times$ 10$^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$).
309: Thus the hot ISM of NGC~2403 can be easily produced by energy input from
310: star formation activity and a heating efficiency as low as 0.001.
311: 
312: One interesting question is whether the hot gas in NGC~2403 is actually bound
313: to the galaxy or not.
314: The escape velocity from a galaxy is usually calculated as
315: $v_e(r)=\sqrt{2|\phi(r)|}$ where $\phi(r)$ is the potential at radius $r$.
316: Assuming a mass model (disk $+$ isothermal dark matter halo) for NGC~2403
317: \citep{fra02} we get an escape velocity of 300$-$350 km s$^{-1}$ 
318: in the central 4 kpc.
319: The thermal velocity of the hot gas is likely to be between the adiabatic
320: sound speed $v_{so}=\sqrt{\frac{5 kT}{3 \mu m_H}}$ and the post-shock 
321: speed $v_{sh}=\sqrt{\frac{16 kT}{3 \mu m_H}}$.
322: If we take the temperature of the one-component Mekal fit kT $\simeq$ 0.25 keV 
323: (T $\simeq$ 2.9 $\times$ 10$^6$ K) we obtain a thermal velocity for the
324: hot gas (n$_{He}$/n$_{H}$=0.1) of 170$-$300  km s$^{-1}$,
325: lower than the escape velocity.
326: Similar values have been found for other galaxies (e.g. NGC~4631, \citet{wan95} and 
327: the Milky Way, \citet{kan97}).
328: The above estimate shows that at least part
329: of the X-ray emitting gas found in NGC~2403 is likely to be 
330: bound to the galaxy.
331: One implication of this result is that this hot gas does not substantially
332: contribute to the enrichment of the surrounding intergalactic medium.
333: Furthermore, if this gas can
334: temporarily escape from the disk into the halo region it will necessarily fall
335: down onto the disk.
336: According to a ``galactic fountain'' type of process the hot gas escaping 
337: from the disk is expected to cool quickly because of adiabatic expansion and in
338: the final phase it could become observable as 
339: neutral gas at anomalous velocities.
340: The anomalous H~{\small I} shown in the p-v diagram of Figure~\ref{fig1} is likely
341: to represent such a final phase of the galactic fountain,
342: whereas the hot X-ray emitting gas would pertain to the initial phase of it.
343: 
344: From the above X-ray luminosity and temperature we estimate an electron density and
345: a mass of the hot gas of 0.15 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ $h^{-\frac{1}{2}} 
346: f^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ cm$^{-3}$ and 6.0 $\times$ 10$^{6} h^{\frac{1}{2}} 
347: f^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $M_{\odot}$ where $h$ is the scaleheight of the disk in kpc
348: and $f$ is the filling factor.
349: The cooling rate of the hot gas can be estimated with the formula \citep{nul84}
350: $\dot{M}_{cool} \approx \frac{M_{X}}{t_{cool}} = \frac{2 \mu m_H L_X}{3 k T}$ that
351: for $n_{He}/n_{H}=0.1$ gives $\dot{M}_{cool} \sim 0.01$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
352: If we consider now the mass of the anomalous H~{\small I}, 
353: a typical size of 10 kpc and the measured infall velocity of 10$-$20 km s$^{-1}$,
354: we estimate the infalling rate of H~{\small I} to be $\dot{M}_{HI} \sim 
355: 0.3-0.6$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ larger than the cooling rate of the hot gas.
356: However such value for cooling rate is probably representative only for the disk
357: component and would vary substantially once the gas has left the disk itself.
358: A more useful quantity is the outflowing rate of the hot gas.
359: Considering the mass and the thermal velocity determined above, and assuming a continous 
360: cycle beetwen hot and neutral gas, such escaping rate
361: turns out to be $\dot{M}_{hot} \sim$ 0.1$-$0.2 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, of the same order
362: as the infalling H~{\small I}.
363: Therefore it is possible that cooling of the X-ray emitting gas in NGC~2403 and its
364: motion via a galactic fountain could produce the observed H~{\small I} 
365: position-velocity pattern. 
366: 
367: Is has been suggested that the anomalous H~{\small I} is common among spiral galaxies
368: \citep{fra01}.
369: Similarly, the hot X-ray emitting gas 
370: is probably present in several spiral galaxies
371: with a high rate of star formation.
372: One can argue, therefore, that the hot gas and the anomalous H~{\small I} are, generally,
373: connected as in NGC~2403.
374: Finally this discovery of diffuse X-ray emitting gas in NGC~2403 has also interesting 
375: implications for the study of our Galaxy.
376: The anomalous H~{\small I} in NGC~2403 is analogous to at least some of the High
377: Velocity Clouds \citep{wak97} of our Galaxy.
378: The suggested relation between the neutral and the hot gas in 
379: NGC~2403 supports the possibility that galactic fountains play an important role
380: also in the Milky Way.
381: 
382: 
383: \begin{acknowledgments}
384: {We thank J. Bregman and G.G.C. Palumbo for helpful comments and advice.
385: We are grateful to an anonymous referee for various improvements in the paper.
386: This work received partial financial support from the Italian Space Agency (ASI).
387: }
388: \end{acknowledgments}
389: 
390: 
391: \clearpage
392: 
393: \begin{thebibliography}{}
394: \bibitem[Bregman(1980)]{bre80} Bregman, J.N. 1980, \apj, 236, 577
395: \bibitem[Bregman \& Houck(1997)]{bre97} Bregman, J.N., Houck, J.C. 1997, \apj, 485, 159
396: \bibitem[Dahlem et al.(2000)]{dah00} Dahlem, M., Parmar, A., Oosterbroek, T., Orr, A., Weaver, K.A., Heckman, T.M. 2000, \apj, 538, 555
397: \bibitem[Ehle, Pietsch, \& Beck(1995)]{ehl95} Ehle, M., Pietsch, W., \& Beck R. 1995, \aap, 295, 289
398: \bibitem[Fabbiano(1989)]{fab89} Fabbiano, G. 1989, \araa, 27, 87 
399: \bibitem[Fraternali et al.(2001)]{fra01} Fraternali, F., Oosterloo T.,
400: Sancisi, R., Van Moorsel, G. 2001, \apj, 562, L47
401: \bibitem[Fraternali et al.(2002)]{fra02} Fraternali, F., Van Moorsel, G., Sancisi, R., Oosterloo T. 2002, \aj, 123, 3124
402: \bibitem[Hasinger et al.(1998)]{has98} Hasinger, G., Burg, R., Giacconi, R., Schmidt, M., Trumper, J., Zamorani, G. 1998, A\&A, 329, 482\bibitem[King et al.(2001)]{kin01} King, A.R., Davies, M.B., Ward, M.J., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M. 2001 \apj, 552, L109 
403: \bibitem[Kaneda et al.(1997)]{kan97} Kaneda, H., Makishima, K., Yamauchi, S., Koyama, K., Matsuzaki, K., Yamasaki, N.Y. 1997, \apj, 491, 638
404: \bibitem[Kotoku et al.(2000)]{kot00} Kotoku, J., Mizuno, T., Kubota, A., Makishima, K. 2000, PASJ, 52.1081
405: \bibitem[Long et al.(1996)]{lon96} Long, K.S, Charles, P.A., Blair, W.P., Gordon, S.M. 1996, \apj, 466, 750
406: \bibitem[Madore \& Friedman(1991)]{mad91} Madore, B.F., Freedman, W.L. 1991, \pasp, 103, 933
407: \bibitem[Matonick et al.(1997)]{mat97} Matonick, D.M., Fesen, R.A., Blair,
408: W.P., Long, K.S. 1997 \apjs, 113, 333
409: \bibitem[Mewe, Lemen, \& Van den Oord(1986)]{mew86} Mewe, R., Lemen, J.R., \& Van den Oord, G.H.J. 1986, \aaps, 65, 511
410: \bibitem[Nulsen, Stewart \& Fabian(1984)]{nul84} Nulsen, P.E.J., Stewart, G.C., Fabian, A.C. 1984, \mnras, 208, 185 
411: \bibitem[Shapiro \& Field(1976)]{sha76} Shapiro, P.R., \& Field, G.B. 1976, \apj, 205, 762
412: \bibitem[Snowden \& Pietsch(1995)]{sno95} Snowden, S.L., Pietsch, W. 1995, \apj, 452, 627
413: \bibitem[Swaters, Sancisi, \& Van der Hulst(1997)]{swa97} Swaters, R.A., Sancisi, R., \& van der Hulst, J.M. 1997, \apj, 491, 140
414: \bibitem[Tennant et al.(2001)]{ten01} Tennant, A.F., Wu, K., Ghosh, K.K., Kolodziejczak, J.J., Swartz, D.A. 2001, \apj, 549, L43
415: \bibitem[Truemper et al.(1991)]{tru91} Truemper, J., Hasinger, G., Aschenbach, B., Braeuninger, H., Briel, U.G. 1991, \nat, 349, 579
416: \bibitem[Valinia et al.(1998)]{val98} Valinia, A., Henriksen, M. J., Mushotzky, R. F.,
417:  Loewenstein, M., Roettiger, K., Madejski, G. M. 1998, \apj, 505, 134
418: \bibitem[Wakker \& Van Woerden(1997)]{wak97} Wakker, B.P., \& van Woerden H. 1997, \araa, 35, 217
419: \bibitem[Wang et al.(1995)]{wan95} Wang, Q.D., Walterbos, R.A.M., Steakley, M.F., Norman, C.A., Braun, R. 1995 \apj, 439, 176 
420: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2001)]{wan01} Wang, Q.D., Immler, S., Walterbos, R., Lauroesch, J.T., Breitschwerdt, D. 2001, \apj, 555, L99 
421: 
422: \end{thebibliography}
423: 
424: 
425: \clearpage
426: 
427: \begin{figure}
428: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
429: \caption{H~{\small I} position-velocity diagram along the major axis
430: (p.a.=124$^{\circ}$, V$_{sys}$=133 km~s$^{-1}$) of NGC~2403.
431: The beam size is $\sim$~15$''$, the velocity resolution is 10.3 km~s$^{-1}$.
432: The contours are $-$0.4, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40 mJy/beam,
433: the r.m.s.\ noise is 0.17 mJy/beam.
434: The white squares show the (projected) rotation curve.
435: The right panel shows a model for a thin H~{\small I} disk with Gaussian velocity
436: dispersion.
437: All the H~{\small I} seen at anomalous velocities (not-reproduced by the model) is
438: what we call ``anomalous gas''. 
439: \label{fig1}}
440: \end{figure}
441: 
442: 
443: \clearpage
444: 
445: \begin{figure}
446: \plotone{f2.eps}
447: \caption{Optical DSS (upper left panel) and X-ray S3 {\it Chandra} 
448: images of NGC~2403 (all on the same scale).
449: The X-ray image in the upper right panel is the result of an adaptive smoothing
450: in the soft energy band (0.4$-$1 keV) after the background subtraction. 
451: The bottom panels show two 5$''$ smoothed S3 images in the soft (left, 0.4$-$1 keV)
452: and hard (right, 1$-$10 keV) bands. 
453: \label{fig2}}
454: \end{figure}
455: 
456: 
457: \clearpage
458: 
459: \begin{figure}
460: \plotone{f3.eps}
461: \caption{Diffuse X-ray emission (0.4$-$1 keV) after the
462: subtraction of point sources (left panel) and H$\alpha$ image of NGC~2403
463: (right panel).
464: The two images are on the same scale.
465: The resolution of the X-ray image is 15$''$.
466: The X-ray grayscale ranges from about 3 to 40 in units of r.m.s.\ 
467: noise above the background (1~$\sigma$ is 6.8 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ cts s$^{-1}$
468: arcsec$^{-2}$). 
469: Note the great similarity between the distribution of hot and ionized gas. 
470: The brighter H~{\small II} regions have X-ray counterparts and the hot gas seems to
471: roughly follow the spiral arms of the galaxy. 
472: \label{fig3}}
473: \end{figure}
474: 
475: 
476: \clearpage
477: 
478: \begin{figure}
479: \plotone{f4.eps}
480: \caption{
481: X-ray spectrum of the diffuse emission of NGC~2403 extracted from an
482: elliptical region of diameter $\sim$ 8$'$ centred on the galactic
483: centre and with the
484: same position angle (p.a.=124$^{\circ}$) as the galaxy.
485: The continuous line is a fit with a two component Mekal model with
486: temperatures: kT$_1$=0.18 keV, kT$_2$=0.73 keV.
487: In the inserted small diagram the relative contributions of the two components
488: are displayed.
489: In the band 0.4$-$2 keV the two components equally contribute to the X-ray 
490: luminosity.
491: In the range 0.5$-$0.8 keV the soft component dominates because of the 
492: strong emission lines.
493: \label{fig4}}
494: \end{figure}
495: 
496: 
497: \end{document}
498: