1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
2: \markboth{P. Lowrance}{APS Conf. Ser. Style}
3: \pagestyle{myheadings}
4: \nofiles
5:
6:
7: \def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
8: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
9: \let\prog=\arg
10:
11:
12: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
13: \marginparwidth 1.25in
14: \marginparsep .125in
15: \marginparpush .25in
16: \reversemarginpar
17:
18: \newcommand\mj{M$_{Jupiter} $}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{Companions to Young Stars}
23: \author{Patrick J. Lowrance}
24: \affil{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Infrared Processing and Analysis Center,
25: Pasadena, CA 91125}
26: \author{\& the NICMOS Environments of Nearby Stars team \& STIS 8176 team}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: Brown dwarfs occupy the important region in the mass range
30: between stars and planets. Their existence, ambigious until only recently, and their
31: properties give insight into stellar and planetary formation. We present
32: statistical results of
33: an infrared, coronagraphic survey
34: of young, nearby stars that includes probable companions to three
35: young G-type stars, Gl 503.2 (G2V), HD 102982 (G3V), and Gl 577 (G5V).
36: The companion to Gl 577 is a possible binary brown dwarf, according to evolutionary models.
37: A dynamical determination of the components' masses
38: will be achievable in the near future and be an excellent
39: test of the predictive ability of the evolutionary models.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43:
44: %Brown dwarfs occupy the important region in the mass range
45: %between stars and planets. Their existence, ambigious until only recently, and their
46: %properties give insight into stellar and planetary formation.
47: %They are thought to form like stars, but do
48: %not have enough mass to sustain hydrogen fusion. With low temperatures and
49: %compact atmospheres
50: %different from stars, the lowest-mass brown dwarfs should
51: %resemble the higher mass giant planets. The observational distinctions between
52: %a planet and brown dwarf have yet to be constructed.
53:
54: To explore fully the
55: similarities and differences between stellar and planetary formation,
56: the study of brown dwarfs as companions is essential. Since the
57: primary's age and distance have been determined, these two properties,
58: usually uncertain for field brown dwarfs, are already known.
59: The primary goal of this survey of 45 young (t$<$300Myr), nearby (d$<$50pc)
60: stars was the discovery of substellar companions. Because substellar objects
61: are hotter and brighter when younger, they can be more easily detected.
62: Each target star was selected based on its being single and
63: having at least two youth criteria (chromospheric activity, lithium, proper motion)
64: indicating a young age. The final sample had a median age of 150 Myr
65: and a median distance of 30 pc.
66: The survey utilized the infrared coronagraph on the
67: Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) on the Hubble
68: Space Telescope (HST). Earlier results include the brown dwarf companions
69: TWA5B (Lowrance et al 1999; L99) and HR 7329B (Lowrance et al 2000).
70:
71: \section{Observations with NICMOS on the Hubble Space Telescope}
72:
73: The observing strategy was to place each star
74: behind the coronagraph, observe for approximately 800s, roll the telescope by 30 degrees,
75: and observe again for 800s (actual integration times were
76: adjusted to fit in variable orbit times). Following the method
77: fully described in L99, when we subtract the two images,
78: a positive and negative image of any candidate companion should remain.
79:
80: \section{Determining Detection Limits}
81:
82: To determine our sensitivity limits within the NICMOS
83: roll-subtracted images of the observed stars, we
84: planted\footnote{software courtesy of A. Ghez and A. Weinberger.}
85: point-spread-function (PSF) stars,
86: generated with Tiny Tim (Krist \& Hook 1997),
87: at random locations in every image.
88: These PSF stars are noiseless, can be
89: adjusted in flux, and were stepped by 0.2 mag to
90: examine a range of magnitudes from H=10--22 for each subtraction.
91:
92: \begin{figure}[t]
93: \plottwo{fig1.ps}{fig2.ps}\label{scatter}
94: \caption{(a)Detection limits reached in survey of young stars. Inset box indicates
95: percentage of objects around which a 5 M$_{Jupiter}$ object would have been detected.
96: Different symbols indicate the different brightness of the primary star plotted; diamonds
97: for H$=$5 mag to triangles for H$=$9 mag.(b) The Adaptive Optics image of the companions to
98: Gl 577A, clearly indicating a binary companion with separation 0.082$\arcsec\pm$0.005 that
99: corresponds to $<$4 AU at that distance.} \label{scatter}
100: \end{figure}
101:
102: \begin{figure}
103: \plottwo{fig3.ps}{fig4.ps}\label{double}
104: \caption{(a)STIS spectra of HD 102982, Gl 577B/C, and Gl 503.2B (solid)
105: (normalized from ergs/s/cm$^2$/\AA) separated by the dashed lines,
106: compared with standard late-type M dwarf spectra (dotted)
107: (Kirkpatrick et al. 1991;Kirkpatrick et al. 1997).
108: The zero level of each
109: spectrum is -1.2, 0, 1.3, 2.7 and 4 respectively)
110: (b)Evolutionary diagrams with all three companions to the G stars. The derived ages of the secondaries
111: match the primaries' ages implied from youth criteria. The binarity of
112: Gl 577 B/C has been taken into account, and it lies on the stellar/substellar boundary.} \label{double}
113: \end{figure}
114:
115:
116: In figure 1, we plot the detection limits found overall in
117: the observations.
118: Our sample has an average primary magnitude H $=$ 7 mag and a median age of 0.15
119: Gyr. At 1$\arcsec$, we can detect $\Delta$H$=$9.5 mag for all
120: stars. At a median
121: distance of 30 pc, 1$\arcsec$=30AU and our average limit corresponds
122: to M$_H$ = 14.1 mag. From
123: models (Burrows, A., personal communication), this corresponds to less than 20 \mj\ for the median age.
124:
125: This program fully sampled 45 young stars with the ability to detect 30 \mj\
126: brown dwarfs at 0.5 $\arcsec$. For some
127: separations from the primary, we were able to detect objects into the high
128: mass planet range. For our oldest stars, t=0.3 Gyr, a 5 \mj\ object is
129: expected to have a absolute H mag of 18.7 mag (Burrows, A., personal
130: communication). Closer than 5$\arcsec$, detectability depends on the brightness, age, and distance
131: of the primary. We find that a 5 \mj\ object could have been
132: detected around 61\% of the primaries at 50AU (Figure 1a), approximately the outer edge
133: of the solar system.
134:
135: \section{Follow-up Observations of Candidate Companions}
136:
137: We followed up the candidate companions to Gl 503.2,
138: HD 102982, and Gl 577
139: with spectra from the HST Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and
140: using Adaptive Optics (AO) imaging at several ground-based telescopes.
141:
142: All three secondaries were observed with the STIS.
143: Each primary was acquired into the
144: 52$\arcsec\times$0.$\arcsec$2 slit and offset based on the NICMOS
145: astrometric results to place the secondary into the slit.
146: Spectral imaging sequences were
147: completed in one orbit per star with the G750M grating in three tilt settings
148: executing a two position dither along the slit at each.
149:
150: The STIS spectra were calibrated, averaged, binned to a resolution of
151: $\sim$ 6\AA, and normalized to the flux (in ergs/s/cm$^2$/\AA) at 8500\AA.
152: We compared the final spectra to those of standard star spectra (see Figure 2a).
153: The best fit appears to lie between
154: M4V and M5V for Gl 503.2B, between M5V and M6V for Gl577B/C and
155: M5V for HD 102982B.
156:
157: The Gl 577 and Gl 503.2 systems were observed
158: with the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope (CFHT) on March 4 and 5,
159: 1999 (UT) using the AO system PUEO (Rigaut et al. 1998) and
160: with the 200 inch Hale telescope at Palomar Observatory on May 14,
161: 2000 (UT) using the AO system PALAO.
162: The Gl 577 system was also observed on 12 Aug 2000 using the AO
163: system on the 10-m W.M. Keck II telescope (Wizinowich et al.
164: 2000) with the slit-viewing camera (SCAM) on NIRSPEC (McLean
165: et al. 1998).
166: Basic reduction included correction for bad pixels and flat-fielding procedures.
167:
168: A common proper
169: motion between the primaries and secondaries was established.
170: Both the Gl 577A and Gl 503.2A proper motions
171: have been measured accurately by the Hipparcos (Perryman et
172: al. 1997) satellite.
173: The proper motion for HD 102982 is listed in the
174: Tycho catalogue (Hog et al. 2000). From adaptive optics observations,
175: the Gl 577 and Gl 503.2 systems
176: were each measured three times. The HD 102982 system was measured in the STIS observation.
177: All were within 1 sigma of the previously measured separation
178: and 3 sigma outside the predicted separation from proper motion. We therefore conclude
179: that Gl 503.2B, HD 102982B, Gl 577B/C are companions to the brighter primaries.
180:
181: \section{Derived Mass and Age}
182: From their placement on pre-main sequence evolutionary tracks (Baraffe
183: et al. 1998), we can infer a mass for the secondaries (Figure 2b).
184: HD 102982B and Gl 503.2B appear to be consistent
185: with 100 Myr low-mass ($<$ 0.15 M$_{\sun}$) stars.
186: Gl 577 B/C appear to lie at the theoretical
187: stellar/substellar border mass of 0.08 M$_{\sun}$ from the infrared magnitude and
188: spectral type. Both components are of equal magnitude, so
189: both might be brown dwarfs.
190:
191: There are very few stars of mass $<$ 0.2 M$_{\sun}$ with a dynamical
192: determination of their mass, as few short-period
193: binaries in this mass range are resolved. High
194: spatial resolution provided by HST and adaptive optics now makes
195: it possible to resolve fainter binaries with smaller separations and
196: shorter periods. With a separation of only $\sim$4 AU,
197: a dynamical mass for Gl 577BC can be
198: determined in less than a decade. Only then will the
199: predictive ability of evolutionary models be tested near
200: the stellar/substellar boundary.
201: Further infrared adaptive optics observations along
202: with radial velocity measurements are currently underway.
203:
204:
205:
206:
207: \begin{references}
208: \reference{Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.H. 1998, A\&A, 337, 403 }
209: \reference{Hog E., et al. 2000, A\&A, 355, 27}
210: \reference{Krist, J. \& Hook, R. 1997, in HST Calibration Workshop, ed. S. Casertano (Baltimore:STScI), 192}
211: \reference{Kirkpatrick , J.D, Henry, T., \& Irwin, M. J. 1997, AJ, 113, 1421 }
212: \reference{Kirkpatrick , J.D., Henry, T., \& McCarthy, D.W 1991, ApJS, 77, 417 }
213: \reference{Lowrance, P.J. et al. 1999, ApJ, 512, L69}
214: \reference{Lowrance P.J. et al. 2000, ApJ, 541, 390}
215: \reference{MacKenty, J.W.. et al. 1997, "NICMOS Instrument Handbook", Version
216: 2.0, (Baltimore: STScI) }
217: \reference{McLean, I.S. et al. 1998, SPIE, 3354, 566 }
218: \reference{Perryman, M.A.C., et al. 1997, A\&A, 323, 49 }
219: \reference{Rigaut, F., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 152 }
220: \reference{Wizinowich, P. et al. 2000, PASP, 112, 315}
221: \end{references}
222:
223: \end{document}
224: