1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint,natbib]{aastex}

2: %\documentstyle[aas2pp4,twoside,aabib]{article}

3: %

4: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.2cm}

5: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-1.0cm}

6: \input epsf

7: %

8: \def\s2n{S^{\prime}/N}

9: \def\vecr{{\bf r}}

10: \def\vecdr{{\bf \Delta r}}

11: \def\dr{{\Delta r}}

12: \def\aq{{\langle Q \rangle}}

13: \def\jco{{J=1-0 $^{13}$CO}}

14: \def\co{$^{13}$CO}

15: %

16: 

17: \def\astroph{0}

18: 

19: %

20: 

21: \begin{document}

22: \title{Structure Function Scaling of a 2MASS Extinction Map of Taurus.}

23: 

24: \author{Paolo Padoan\footnote{padoan@jpl.nasa.gov},

25: Laurent Cambresy and William Langer}

26: \affil{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, MS 169-506,

27:      California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099, USA}

28: 

29: 

30: \begin{abstract}

31: 

32: We compute the structure function scaling of a 2MASS extinction map 

33: of the Taurus molecular cloud complex. The scaling exponents

34: of the structure functions of the extinction map follow the Boldyrev's

35: velocity structure function scaling of super--sonic turbulence. This 

36: confirms our previous result based on a spectral map of $^{13}$CO

37: J=1-0 covering the same region and suggests that supersonic turbulence 

38: is important in the fragmentation of this star--forming cloud. 

39: 

40: \end{abstract}

41: 

42: \keywords{

43: turbulence -- ISM: dust, extinction -- ISM: kinematics and dynamics   

44: }

45: 

46: \section{Introduction}

47: 

48: Stars are formed predominantly from very large clouds of cold interstellar

49: gas containing up to millions of solar masses of material. 

50: The dynamics of such clouds is therefore a crucial ingredient in the process of

51: star formation. Observations of emission spectra of molecular transitions

52: have shown that the kinematics of star--forming clouds is best described

53: as supersonic random motions, often referred to as supersonic turbulence.

54: Numerical simulations of supersonic turbulence have indeed been compared

55: successfully with the observations, in the sense that many statistical

56: properties of numerical supersonic turbulent flows are also found in the

57: observational data (e.g. Padoan et al. 1998, 1999, 2001). 

58: 

59: \nocite{Padoan+98cat} \nocite{Padoan+99per} \nocite{Padoan+2001cores}

60: 

61: The cold gas in star--forming clouds, especially their molecular component, 

62: cools very rapidly down to a typical equilibrium temperature

63: of approximately 10~K. The shocks caused by the observed random supersonic 

64: velocity field are therefore roughly isothermal, which allows them 

65: to compress the gas effectively. Expansions are also favored by the 

66: isothermal behavior of the gas and large voids of very low density

67: can be generated. The result is a very large contrast between

68: the highest and the lowest densities, as commonly found in numerical

69: simulations with an isothermal equation of state. We usually refer to 

70: this effect of the turbulent velocity on the density field as 

71: {\it turbulent fragmentation}, to stress the fact that star--forming

72: clouds are more likely fragmented into dense prestellar cores directly

73: by the turbulent velocity field, rather than by a hierarchical process 

74: of gravitational fragmentation.   

75: 

76: The traditional way to study the dynamics of star forming clouds is

77: to probe their kinematics by the Doppler shift in spectral lines

78: of molecular transitions. However, the dynamics can also be studied

79: through the density field, as the gas density is so strongly affected

80: by the supersonic velocity. The investigation of the cloud spatial structure 

81: may be used to test predictions of numerical and analytical models more 

82: directly than using the velocity field. Projected density is in fact 

83: easier to measure than the velocity field. This is especially true

84: if stellar extinction measurements are available, since they provide 

85: the most reliable estimate of column density. 

86: 

87: Thanks to the recently completed ``Two Micron All Sky Survey'' 

88: (2MASS; Cutri et al. 2001),

89: it is now possible to generate extinction maps of several extended giant 

90: molecular cloud complexes with a dynamical range in both column density 

91: and spatial resolution that is not matched by any molecular line survey.

92: In this work we derive new extinction maps of the Taurus region

93: using 2MASS point source data, and show that we can probe values of dust 

94: column 

95: density over more than two orders of magnitude and achieve a spatial

96: resolution higher than in IRAS 100~$\mu$m images (\S~2). In \S~3 we 

97: present the results of the structure function analysis of the extinction

98: map and obtain a scaling that is indistinguishable from that of the 

99: velocity structure functions in supersonic turbulence. Conclusions

100: are drawn in \S~4.    

101: 

102: 

103: \section{Extinction Maps from 2MASS Data}

104: 

105: Lada et al. (1994) use the stellar

106: extinction determined from the IR color excess, instead of stellar 

107: counts, to map interstellar clouds. Their method is based on superimposing 

108: a regular grid on the observed region, and giving each grid cell 

109: a value of extinction equal to the average extinction of the stars

110: within that cell. The number of stars per cell decreases with

111: increasing average extinction in the cell, because only the brightest

112: background stars can be seen through a large column of dust. 

113: The method has been improved by Lombardi \& Alves (2001), using 

114: Gaussian filtering to obtain a smooth regularly sampled map.

115: 

116: \nocite{Lada+94} \nocite{Lombardi+Alves2001}

117: 

118: In this work we compute stellar extinction maps with the  

119: method proposed by Cambresy et al. (2002). This method uses 

120: adaptive cells that contain a fixed number of stars instead of cells 

121: of fixed size. In this way it is possible to keep the spatial resolution 

122: as high as allowed by the local stellar density. The spatial resolution 

123: is higher in regions of low extinction than in regions of large extinction, 

124: where fewer background stars are detected and larger cells must be used. 

125: The average spatial resolution over the whole map can be changed

126: by changing the number of stars per cell. 

127: 

128: \ifnum\astroph=1

129: 

130: \begin{table}[h]

131: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

132: \hline

133: \hline

134: No. of stars & $\sigma_{A_V}$ & Median Resolution & $A_{V,{\rm max}}$  \\

135:              &  (mag)         & (arcmin)          & (mag) \\

136: \hline

137: 100 & 0.26 & 12.4 & 8.0 \\

138: 30  & 0.34 & 6.7  & 11.7 \\

139: 10  & 0.49 & 3.4  & 19.5 \\

140: 3   & 0.85 & 1.7  & 26.3 \\

141: 1   & 1.30 & 1.0  & 32.7 \\

142: \hline

143: \end{tabular}

144: \caption{Extinction map parameters for different spatial resolutions.}

145: \label{t1}

146: \end{table}

147: 

148: \fi

149: 

150: 

151: The color excess is computed using the relation

152: $E_{H-K_s} = (H-K_s)_{\rm obs} - (H-K_s)_{\rm int}$,

153: where $(H-K_s)_{\rm obs}$ is the observed median color in a cell and

154: $(H-K_s)_{\rm int}$ is the intrinsic median color, estimated 

155: from the colors of supposedly unreddened stars.

156: In the method by Lada et al. (1994) the mean color is used instead of

157: the median color. We prefer to use the median color because it has 

158: the advantage of minimizing the effect of foreground stars, as 

159: shown by Cambresy et al. (2002). Visual extinction values are 

160: obtained from the color excess using the Rieke and Lebofsky (1985) 

161: extinction law, which results in the relation 

162: $A_V  = 15.87 \times E_{H-K_s}\label{col2av}$.

163: 

164: \nocite{Cambresy+2002} \nocite{Rieke+Lebofsky85}

165: 

166: Cambresy et al. (2002) have applied this method to study the North

167: America and Pelican Nebulae. However, these nebulae are

168: rather close to the galactic plane, and are therefore very difficult

169: to study with extinction measurements due to the mixture of stars and 

170: other clouds in their background. The Taurus molecular cloud complex

171: is far from the galactic plane (approximately $15^\circ$ south)

172: and very close to us, at a distance of approximately 140 pc 

173: (Kenyon, Dobrzycka \& Hartmann 1994). Contamination from foreground 

174: stars is therefore negligible for this region, as well as confusion 

175: with other clouds in the distant background.  

176: 

177: We have computed extinction maps of the Taurus molecular cloud complex

178: using 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 stars per cell covering a region of 

179: $12^\circ\times10^\circ$. Figure~\ref{fig1} shows the map obtained

180: with 10 stars per cell. Approximately 115 known young embedded stars

181: (Herbig \& Bell 1988; Leinert et al. 1993; Kenyon et al. 1994; 

182: Briceno et al. 1998) have been excluded from the 2MASS catalog before

183: computing the extinction maps. The intrinsic color is computed as

184: the median color of stars in regions where no $^{12}CO$ (Dame et al. 

185: 2001) is detected, within a field larger than the actual extinction 

186: map ($155^\circ< l <177^\circ$) and is found to be 

187: $(H-K_s)_{\rm int}=0.13$~mag. The standard deviation of the color

188: of these unreddened stars provides an estimate of the uncertainty 

189: (1-$\sigma$ noise) in the extinction maps.  

190: 

191: The value of this uncertainty, the median angular resolution (cell 

192: diameter) and the maximum extinction value for each map are given in 

193: Table~\ref{t1}. Since cell sizes are adapted to contain a fixed number 

194: of stars, the statistical uncertainty is independent of the extinction 

195: level (the noise is uniform over the map). The highest resolution achieved

196: with these maps is remarkable. The map with 3 stars per cell, for example, 

197: yields a median resolution of 1.7', almost 3 times better than the 

198: resolution of IRAS 100~$\mu$m images (4'$\times$5'). 

199:  

200: \nocite{Kenyon+94} \nocite{Herbig+Bell88} \nocite{Leinert+93}

201: \nocite{Briceno+98}

202: 

203: 

204: \ifnum\astroph=1

205: 

206: %\onecolumn

207: 

208: \begin{figure}[h]

209: %\centerline{

210: \epsfxsize=8cm \epsfbox{f1.eps}

211: %}

212: \caption[]{Extinction map of the Taurus region computed with 10 stars

213: per cell.}

214: \label{fig1}

215: \end{figure}

216: 

217: %\twocolumn

218: 

219: \fi

220: 

221: As shown in Table~\ref{t1}, we can probe values of $A_V$ ranging 

222: from 0.3~mag (1$\sigma$ detection in the 100 stars per cell map) 

223: to 33~mag (largest extinction in the 1 star per cell map). 

224: Using a standard gas to dust ratio, 

225: $N(H+H_2)/A_{\rm V}=2\times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$mag$^{-1}$ (Bohlin et al. 1978),

226: the range in extinction corresponds to approximately two orders of

227: magnitude in column density,

228: from $N(H+H_2)=6\times 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ to 

229:      $N(H+H_2)=6.6\times 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$.

230: 

231: 

232: 

233: \section{Structure Functions of Projected Density}

234: 

235: 

236: \ifnum\astroph=1

237: 

238: \begin{figure}[h]

239: %\centerline{

240: \epsfxsize=7cm \epsfbox{f2.eps}

241: %}

242: \caption[]{Structure functions of the extinction map from $p=1$ to 20 

243: relative to the third order structure function. The extinction map with

244: 10 stars per cell has been used. The solid lines show the least square

245: fits used to define the power law slopes.}

246: \label{fig2}

247: \end{figure}

248: 

249: \fi

250: 

251: 

252: The structure functions of the extinction map, $A_V({\bf x})$,

253: are defined as:

254: %

255: \begin{equation}

256: S_p(l)=\langle |A_V({\bf x})-A_V({\bf x}+{\bf l})|^p\rangle

257: \label{mom}

258: \end{equation}

259: %

260: where $p$ is the order and the average is extended to all map positions

261: ${\bf x}$.

262: In turbulent flows it is found that the structure functions of velocity

263: are power laws. Assuming that the structure functions of projected density 

264: (or extinction) are power laws as well, we call $\eta(p)$ the exponents 

265: of these power laws:

266: %

267: \begin{equation}

268: S_p(l)\propto l^{\eta(p)}

269: \label{}

270: \end{equation}

271: %

272: 

273: In Figure~\ref{fig2} we have plotted the structure functions of the

274: map obtained with 10 stars per cell, relative to the third order 

275: structure function, since we are interested in investigating the

276: relative scaling, $\eta(p)/\eta(3)$ (this follows the idea of

277: extended self--similarity by Benzi et al. 1993 and Dubrulle 1994). 

278: 

279: \ifnum\astroph=1

280: 

281: \begin{figure}[h]

282: %\centerline{

283: \epsfxsize=7cm \epsfbox{f3.eps}

284: %}

285: \caption[]{Top panel: Relative structure function scaling. Bottom 

286: panel: Structure function exponents divided by the

287: Boldyrev's scaling.}

288: \label{fig3}

289: \end{figure}

290: 

291: \fi

292: 

293: The function $\eta(p)/\eta(3)$ is plotted in Figure~\ref{fig3}. 

294: The velocity scaling predicted by Boldyrev (2002) for supersonic 

295: turbulence is shown as a solid line, the one predicted by She \& 

296: Leveque (1994) for incompressible turbulence is plotted as a dashed line

297: and the Kolmogorov's velocity scaling, $p/3$, is shown by the dotted

298: line. The scaling of the structure functions of projected density

299: is found to be the same as the scaling of velocity structure functions

300: in supersonic turbulence.

301: {\it A priori} we do not know if the relative scaling of projected density

302: should be the same as that of the velocity; the velocity scaling from 

303: theoretical models is shown here only as a reference. 

304: 

305: \nocite{Boldyrev2002} \nocite{Benzi+93}

306: \nocite{Kolmogorov41} \nocite{She+Leveque94} \nocite{Dubrulle94}

307: 

308: Padoan et al. (2002) have recently analyzed in a similar way $^{13}$CO maps

309: of the same Taurus region and of Perseus. The present result for the 

310: relative scaling of the structure functions in Taurus confirms the 

311: results of that work. However, the sample size from the 2MASS data is

312: much larger than the sample size of the $^{13}$CO map. Furthermore, the

313: spatial resolution of the extinction map is slightly better 

314: and the range of column density sampled 20 times larger than in the

315: $^{13}$CO map. The statistical significance of high order moments

316: from the analysis of the 2MASS data should therefore be much higher 

317: than from the $^{13}$CO maps.

318: 

319: \nocite{Padoan+2002scaling}

320: 

321: 

322: 

323: \section{Conclusions}

324: 

325: Boldyrev (2002) has recently proposed an analytic model for the velocity 

326: structure function scaling in supersonic turbulence. The model is an 

327: extension of the scaling of incompressible turbulence proposed by

328: She \& Leveque (1994) and has already been successfully tested with 

329: numerical simulations of supersonic turbulence (Boldyrev, Nordlund \& 

330: Padoan 2002a). An equivalent analytic model for the scaling of the 

331: structure functions of projected density in supersonic turbulence is

332: not available yet. Only the slope of the second order structure function 

333: has been derived from the velocity structure functions, under certain 

334: approximations (Boldyrev, Nordlund \& Padoan 2002b). However, the fact

335: that the projected density follows the same scaling as the velocity 

336: field in supersonic turbulence suggests that the density field in the 

337: Taurus region is the result of a multiplicative process with a Log-Poisson

338: statistics (Dubrulle 1994), very likely the result of the turbulent

339: fragmentation. 

340: 

341: \nocite{Boldyrev+2002scaling} \nocite{Boldyrev+2002structure} 

342: \nocite{She+Leveque94} \nocite{Dubrulle94}

343: 

344: The importance of supersonic turbulence in the fragmentation of 

345: star-forming regions has been established in previous works (e.g. 

346: Padoan \& Nordlund 1999; Padoan et al. 2001; Padoan \& Nordlund 2002).

347: The purpose of the present work is primarily to determine

348: the statistical properties of the fragmentation process, independent of 

349: its origin. Such statistical properties may be universal, for example 

350: if they are mainly the consequence of turbulence, or depend on several 

351: physical parameters, such as gas density, temperature, turbulent 

352: velocity dispersion and star formation activity. We plan to compute 

353: and analyze 2MASS extinction maps of different extended star-forming 

354: regions in order to establish the properties of the fragmentation process 

355: that leads to the formation of stars in different environments. 

356: 

357: \nocite{Padoan+Nordlund99mhd} \nocite{Padoan+2001cores} 

358: \nocite{Padoan+Nordlund2002imf} 

359: 

360: 

361: 

362: \acknowledgements

363: 

364: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky

365: Survey, which is a joint project of the

366: University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis

367: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded

368: by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science

369: Foundation.

370: 

371: The work of PP was performed while PP held a National Research 

372: Council Associateship Award at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 

373: California Institute of Technology.

374: 

375:  

376: 

377: 

378: \clearpage

379: 

380: %\bibliographystyle{apj}

381: %\bibliography{apj-jour,padoan,MC,dust,bd}

382: 

383: \begin{thebibliography}{21}

384: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

385: 

386: \bibitem[{{Benzi} {et~al.}(1993){Benzi}, {Ciliberto}, {Tripiccione}, {Baudet},

387:   {Massaioli}, \& {Succi}}]{Benzi+93}

388: {Benzi}, R., {Ciliberto}, S., {Tripiccione}, R., {Baudet}, C., {Massaioli}, F.,

389:   \& {Succi}, S. 1993, \pre, 48, 29

390: 

391: \bibitem[{{Boldyrev}(2002)}]{Boldyrev2002}

392: {Boldyrev}, S. 2002, ApJ, 569, 841

393: 

394: \bibitem[{{Boldyrev} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}}){Boldyrev}, {Nordlund}, \&

395:   {Padoan}}]{Boldyrev+2002structure}

396: {Boldyrev}, S., {Nordlund}, {\AA}., \& {Padoan}, P. 2002{\natexlab{a}},

397:   Physical Review Letters, in press (see also astro-ph/0203452)

398: 

399: \bibitem[{{Boldyrev} {et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}}){Boldyrev}, {Nordlund}, \&

400:   {Padoan}}]{Boldyrev+2002scaling}

401: ---. 2002{\natexlab{b}}, ApJ, 573, 678

402: 

403: \bibitem[{{Brice{\~ n}o} {et~al.}(1998){Brice{\~ n}o}, {Hartmann}, {Stauffer},

404:   \& {Mart{\' i}n}}]{Briceno+98}

405: {Brice{\~ n}o}, C.~., {Hartmann}, L., {Stauffer}, J., \& {Mart{\' i}n}, E.

406:   1998, AJ, 115, 2074

407: 

408: \bibitem[{{Cambr{\' e}sy} {et~al.}(2002){Cambr{\' e}sy}, {Beichman}, {Jarrett},

409:   \& {Cutri}}]{Cambresy+2002}

410: {Cambr{\' e}sy}, L., {Beichman}, C.~A., {Jarrett}, T.~H., \& {Cutri}, R.~M.

411:   2002, AJ, 123, 2559

412: 

413: \bibitem[{Dubrulle(1994)}]{Dubrulle94}

414: Dubrulle, B. 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 959

415: 

416: \bibitem[{{Herbig} \& {Bell}(1988)}]{Herbig+Bell88}

417: {Herbig}, G.~H. \& {Bell}, K.~R. 1988, {Catalog of emission line stars of the

418:   orion population : 3 : 1988} (Lick Observatory Bulletin, Santa Cruz: Lick

419:   Observatory, |c1988)

420: 

421: \bibitem[{{Kenyon} {et~al.}(1994){Kenyon}, {Dobrzycka}, \&

422:   {Hartmann}}]{Kenyon+94}

423: {Kenyon}, S.~J., {Dobrzycka}, D., \& {Hartmann}, L. 1994, AJ, 108, 1872

424: 

425: \bibitem[{Kolmogorov(1941)}]{Kolmogorov41}

426: Kolmogorov, A.~N. 1941, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 30, 301

427: 

428: \bibitem[{Lada {et~al.}(1994)Lada, Lada, Clemens, \& Bally}]{Lada+94}

429: Lada, C.~J., Lada, E.~A., Clemens, D.~P., \& Bally, J. 1994, ApJ, 429, 694

430: 

431: \bibitem[{{Leinert} {et~al.}(1993){Leinert}, {Zinnecker}, {Weitzel},

432:   {Christou}, {Ridgway}, {Jameson}, {Haas}, \& {Lenzen}}]{Leinert+93}

433: {Leinert}, C., {Zinnecker}, H., {Weitzel}, N., {Christou}, J., {Ridgway},

434:   S.~T., {Jameson}, R., {Haas}, M., \& {Lenzen}, R. 1993, A\&A, 278, 129

435: 

436: \bibitem[{{Lombardi} \& {Alves}(2001)}]{Lombardi+Alves2001}

437: {Lombardi}, M. \& {Alves}, J. 2001, A\&A, 377, 1023

438: 

439: \bibitem[{Padoan {et~al.}(1999)Padoan, Bally, Billawala, Juvela, \&

440:   Nordlund}]{Padoan+99per}

441: Padoan, P., Bally, J., Billawala, Y., Juvela, M., \& Nordlund, {\AA}. 1999,

442:   ApJ, 525, 318

443: 

444: \bibitem[{{Padoan} {et~al.}(2002){Padoan}, {Boldyrev}, {Langer}, \&

445:   {Nordlund}}]{Padoan+2002scaling}

446: {Padoan}, P., {Boldyrev}, S., {Langer}, W., \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 2002, in

447:   preparation

448: 

449: \bibitem[{Padoan {et~al.}(1998)Padoan, Juvela, Bally, \&

450:   Nordlund}]{Padoan+98cat}

451: Padoan, P., Juvela, M., Bally, J., \& Nordlund, {\AA}. 1998, ApJ, 504, 300

452: 

453: \bibitem[{{Padoan} {et~al.}(2001){Padoan}, {Juvela}, {Goodman}, \&

454:   {Nordlund}}]{Padoan+2001cores}

455: {Padoan}, P., {Juvela}, M., {Goodman}, A.~A., \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 2001, ApJ,

456:   553, 227

457: 

458: \bibitem[{Padoan \& Nordlund(1999)}]{Padoan+Nordlund99mhd}

459: Padoan, P. \& Nordlund, {\AA}. 1999, ApJ, 526, 279

460: 

461: \bibitem[{{Padoan} \& {Nordlund}(2002)}]{Padoan+Nordlund2002imf}

462: {Padoan}, P. \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 2002, ApJ, in press (see also

463:   astro-ph/0011465)

464: 

465: \bibitem[{{Rieke} \& {Lebofsky}(1985)}]{Rieke+Lebofsky85}

466: {Rieke}, G.~H. \& {Lebofsky}, M.~J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618

467: 

468: \bibitem[{She \& L{\'e}v{\^e}que(1994)}]{She+Leveque94}

469: She, Z.-S. \& L{\'e}v{\^e}que, E. 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 336

470: 

471: \end{thebibliography}

472: 

473: 

474: 

475: 

476: \ifnum\astroph=0

477: \clearpage

478: 

479: 

480: \onecolumn

481: 

482: {\bf Table and Figure captions:} \\

483: 

484: {\bf Table \ref{t1}:} Extinction map parameters for different spatial 

485: resolutions. \\

486: 

487: {\bf Figure \ref{fig1}:} Extinction map of the Taurus region computed 

488: with 10 stars per cell. \\

489: 

490: {\bf Figure \ref{fig2}:} Structure functions of the extinction map from 

491: $p=1$ to 20 relative to the third order structure function. The extinction 

492: map with 10 stars per cell has been used. The solid lines show the least 

493: square fits used to define the power law slopes. \\

494: 

495: {\bf Figure \ref{fig3}:} Top panel: Relative structure function scaling. 

496: Bottom panel: Structure function exponents divided by the

497: Boldyrev's scaling. \\

498: 

499: 

500: \clearpage

501: \begin{table}

502: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

503: \hline

504: \hline

505: No. of stars & $\sigma_{A_V}$ & Median Resolution & $A_{V,{\rm max}}$  \\

506:              &  (mag)         & (arcmin)          & (mag) \\

507: \hline

508: 100 & 0.26 & 12.4 & 8.0 \\

509: 30  & 0.34 & 6.7  & 11.7 \\

510: 10  & 0.49 & 3.4  & 19.5 \\

511: 3   & 0.85 & 1.7  & 26.3 \\

512: 1   & 1.30 & 1.0  & 32.7 \\

513: \hline

514: \end{tabular}

515: \caption{Extinction map parameters for different spatial resolutions}

516: \label{t1}

517: \end{table}

518: 

519: \clearpage

520: \begin{figure}

521: \centerline{

522: \epsfxsize=13cm \epsfbox{f1.eps}

523: }

524: \caption[]{}

525: \label{fig1}

526: \end{figure}

527: 

528: \clearpage

529: \begin{figure}

530: \centerline{

531: \epsfxsize=13cm \epsfbox{f2.eps}

532: }

533: \caption[]{}

534: \label{fig2}

535: \end{figure}

536: 

537: \clearpage

538: \begin{figure}

539: \centerline{

540: \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{f3.eps}

541: }

542: \caption[]{}

543: \label{fig3}

544: \end{figure}

545: 

546: \fi

547: 

548: \end{document}

549: 

550: