1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3:
4: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}
5: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\sun}$\,}
6:
7: \shorttitle{Limits on the Near-IR Variability of Sgr A*}
8: \shortauthors{Hornstein, Ghez, Tanner, Morris, Becklin, \& Wizinowich}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title{Limits on the Short Term Variability of Sagittarius A* in the Near-Infrared}
13:
14: \author{S.D. Hornstein\altaffilmark{1},
15: A.M. Ghez\altaffilmark{1,2}, A. Tanner\altaffilmark{1},
16: M. Morris\altaffilmark{1}, E.E. Becklin\altaffilmark{1},
17: P. Wizinowich\altaffilmark{3}}
18: \email{seth@astro.ucla.edu}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: The recent detection of a 3-hr X-ray flare by the Chandra
22: Observatory has raised the possibility of enhanced emission
23: over a broad range of wavelengths from Sgr A*, the suspected
24: 2.6 x 10$^{6}$ \msun black hole at the Galactic Center,
25: during a flaring event. We have, therefore, reconstructed 3-hr
26: data sets from 2\micron ~speckle and adaptive optics images
27: ($\theta_{core}$ = 50 - 100 mas) obtained with the W. M. Keck
28: 10-m telescopes between 1995 and 2001. In 25 separate
29: observations, no evidence of any significant excess emission
30: associated with Sgr A* was detected. The lowest of our
31: detection limits gives an observed limit for the quiescent
32: state of Sgr A* of 0.09$\pm$0.005 mJy, or, equivalently, a
33: dereddened value of 2.0$\pm$0.1 mJy, which is a factor of 2
34: lower than the best previously published quiescent
35: value. Under the assumption that there are random 3-hr flares
36: producing both enhanced X-ray and near-infrared emission, our
37: highest limit constrains the variable state of Sgr A* to
38: $\lesssim$0.8 mJy (observed) or 19 mJy (dereddened). These
39: results suggest that the model favored by \citet{mark01}, in
40: which the flare is produced through local heating of
41: relativistic particles surrounding Sgr A* (e.g., a sudden
42: magnetic reconnection event), is unlikely, because it predicts
43: peak 2\micron ~emission of $\sim$300 mJy, well above our
44: detection limit.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- infrared: galaxies --- X-rays:
48: galaxies --- accretion, accretion disks --- galaxies: jets ---
49: black hole physics}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
52: University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562}
53: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute for
54: Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California,
55: Los Angeles, CA 90095-1565}
56: \altaffiltext{3}{W.M. Keck
57: Observatory, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Hwy., Kamuela, HI 96743}
58:
59: \section{Introduction} \label{intro}
60:
61: The variability of Sagittarius (Sgr) A* at X-ray wavelengths
62: \citep{bag01a} has bolstered the case for associating this
63: source with the suspected 2.6 x 10$^{6}$ \msun black hole at
64: the center of our Galaxy \citep{eckart97, genz97, genz00,
65: ghez98, ghez00}. In two Chandra observations separated by
66: almost a year and having a total of 76 ksec of exposure time,
67: Sgr A* was detected at X-ray wavelengths for the first time
68: and was also seen to flare in intensity over a time scale of 3
69: hours \citep{bag01a,bag01b}. While the flare's short duration
70: implied a small region of origin, $\lesssim$400 R$_{s}$ (where
71: $R_{s}$ is the Schwarzschild radius =
72: 2GM$_{\bullet}$/c$^{2}$), its large amplitude, a factor of 50,
73: has raised the possibility of detecting corresponding
74: intensity enhancements at wavelengths outside the X-ray
75: regime.
76:
77: Existing models for Sgr A*'s flared state make very disparate
78: predictions for the emission at wavelengths between the X-ray
79: and radio regimes \citep{mark01,liu02}. The wide differences
80: between these models are a result of assuming different
81: geometries (disk vs. jet) and emission mechanisms for the
82: flaring process (e.g., enhanced accretion rates vs. magnetic
83: reconnection). In some models, the predicted emission in the
84: flared state, at infrared (IR) wavelengths, dramatically
85: exceeds that of existing detection limits \citep{genz99,
86: stol99, morris01}. For example, the preferred model of
87: \citet{mark01} predicts an observed 2\micron ~flux density of
88: $\sim$13 mJy, or a dereddened flux density of $\sim$300 mJy,
89: during the flared state. Unlike the situation at radio
90: wavelengths, where long-term monitoring campaigns have been
91: used to constrain the flared state of Sgr A* \citep{zhao01},
92: the limited time coverage and spatial resolution of published
93: IR experiments prevent meaningful constraints on the flared
94: state's IR emission from being inferred\footnote{While several
95: papers have reported the possible detection of a variable
96: near-infrared source coincident with Sgr A*
97: \citep{herbst93,close95,genz97}, subsequent high resolution
98: observations have identified this emission to be from high
99: proper motion sources \citep{eckart95, eckart97, ghez98,
100: ghez02}.} and, thus, the reported limits are assumed to be
101: associated with Sgr A*'s quiescent state.
102:
103: The W. M. Keck Observatory dynamical study of stars in the
104: central stellar cluster \citep{ghez98,ghez00,suvi02} provides
105: a rich source of high angular resolution 2\micron ~data
106: between 1995 and 2001. In this paper, we present 2\micron
107: ~flux density limits from maps that were each composed of data
108: from a single night. The elapsed time of 3-4 hours in each map
109: is approximately the same as the time scale of the observed
110: X-ray flare, making this data set ideally suited for possibly
111: detecting a flare of this type. Given the quantity of these
112: observations, our non-detections establish a robust upper
113: limit for the flared state's 2\micron ~emission intensity.
114:
115: \section{Observations}\label{obs}
116: High resolution, near-infrared observations of the Galactic
117: Center were conducted from 1995 June to 2001 July using both
118: speckle and adaptive optics (AO) imaging techniques on the
119: Keck 10-m telescopes. The speckle observations were obtained
120: in the K-band ($\lambda_{o}$ = 2.2\micron,
121: $\Delta\lambda$=0.4\micron) using the Keck I facility
122: near-infrared camera (NIRC; \citealt{matt94}) with external
123: re-imaging optics. This resulted in a pixel scale of
124: 0\farcs0203 and a field of view (FOV) of
125: 5\farcs12$\times$5\farcs12 \citep{matt96}. During each night
126: of observations several thousand short exposures (t$_{exp}$=
127: 0.137 sec) were taken in sets of $\sim$200. A more limited
128: set of data was collected using two different science cameras
129: behind the Keck II AO system \citep{wiz00b}. The first AO data
130: set was collected in the K'-band ($\lambda_{o}$ = 2.1\micron,
131: $\Delta\lambda$=0.35\micron) in early 1999 with the
132: near-infrared engineering camera (KCAM; \citealt{wiz00a}), which
133: had a pixel scale of 0\farcs0175, a FOV of
134: 4\farcs4$\times$4\farcs4. Each image had an exposure time of 5
135: sec. The slit-viewing camera of NIRSPEC (SCAM;
136: \citealt{mclean98}) provided a second set of AO images for
137: this study. These images, like the speckle images, were made
138: in the K-band and have a pixel scale of 0\farcs0170 and a FOV
139: of 4\farcs4$\times$4\farcs4, and exposure time of 10 sec. USNO
140: 0600-28579500 served as the natural guide star for all of
141: these AO observations. Since this guide star is both faint (R
142: = 13.2) and distant from the target (r$\sim$30\arcsec), the AO
143: performance was non-optimal. Table \ref{datesobs} provides a
144: summary of all observations.
145:
146: \section{Data Analysis \& Results}
147: Three basic steps constitute the data analysis process in this
148: program. First, high angular resolution maps are generated
149: from the individual short exposure frames
150: (\S\ref{construction}). Second, all point sources in the FOV
151: are identified and a direct detection of Sgr A* is ruled out
152: (\S\ref{id}). Third, limits for Sgr A* are derived from the
153: residual maps, in which all identified point sources have been
154: removed (\S\ref{limits}).
155:
156: \subsection{Construction of Images}\label{construction}
157: Image processing proceeds similarly to that carried out for
158: the dynamical experiment with one exception. Rather than
159: combining all the data from the duration of an observing run,
160: typically 2-3 nights, we synthesize the data over each night
161: to produce 27 maps, each of which is limited to an elapsed
162: time of 3-4 hours. Since the details of this method are
163: described elsewhere \citep{ghez98}, only a brief summary is
164: provided here. Standard image reduction techniques are
165: applied to all the individual speckle and AO frames. For the
166: speckle data, a two stage shift-and-add (SAA;
167: \citealt{christ91,ghez98}) analysis then produces the final
168: high resolution maps. In the first stage, the 200 frames in
169: each set are combined to form an intermediate SAA image. Then,
170: these multiple intermediate SAA images (from throughout the
171: night) are combined to form one final SAA map. This allows
172: each intermediate image to be examined for seeing quality. In
173: combining the intermediate images, a seeing cut is established
174: so as to exclude those images with the worst seeing from the
175: final map. For the AO data, this cut is also carried out on
176: the individual AO images before they are registered and
177: averaged together. Figure \ref{maps} displays representative
178: final nightly speckle and AO maps.
179:
180: \subsection{Point Source Identification \& Search for Sgr A*'s near-infrared emission}\label{id}
181: In all maps, stars are identified using StarFinder, an IDL
182: package developed for astrometry and photometry in crowded
183: stellar fields \citep{diolaiti00}. This package iteratively
184: generates estimates of the point spread function (PSF) from a
185: few selected bright stars and then identifies point sources
186: over the entire FOV through cross-correlation of the map with
187: the PSF model. For the PSF extraction, we found that the most
188: reliable PSF models are obtained with a support size of
189: $\sim$2\arcsec, which represents a compromise between needing
190: to accommodate the large PSF halos and yet having a limited
191: FOV. This choice limits our analysis to images with PSF halo
192: sizes of 0\farcs4 or less, as the PSFs of the remaining two
193: images are poorly characterized by this process. The PSF model
194: is based on four of the five brightest stars in the FOV (IRS
195: 16NE, 16C, 16NW, and 29N; see Figure \ref{maps}); IRS 16SW is
196: avoided as a PSF model star, since it is surrounded by
197: relatively bright stars in its immediate vicinity. For point
198: source identification, a correlation coefficient greater than
199: 0.8 between the PSF model and the actual stellar image is
200: required to avoid spurious detections. This process results in
201: the identification of $\sim$100 point sources in each map.
202:
203: The speckle and AO images have significantly different
204: PSFs. Nonetheless, both PSFs are composed of a compact core on
205: top of a broader halo. Table \ref{datesobs} provides the
206: characterization of the PSF in each map based on the radial
207: profile of the PSF model. While the speckle images have PSF
208: core FWHM that are nearly diffraction limited
209: ($\sim$0\farcs05) and $\sim$40\% smaller than that of the AO
210: images ($\sim$0\farcs08), the AO PSF core contains $\sim$30\%
211: of the total energy, $\sim$12 times more than the typical
212: speckle PSF.
213:
214: At this stage in the analysis, it is possible to look for
215: direct detections of Sgr A*. We use proper motion acceleration
216: vectors \citep{ghez00} to pinpoint the central black hole's
217: position relative to the nominal radio position of Sgr A*
218: \citep{menten97} to within 0\farcs04 (1$\sigma$). Within
219: 0\farcs08 of this location, 4 sources (13.9~$<$~K~$<$~16.5)
220: are identified, all of which were previously detected in
221: "monthly" maps made from all data in a single observing run
222: \citep{ghez98,ghez02} and, furthermore, have significant
223: proper motions. This high stellar density emphasizes the need
224: for improved accuracy in Sgr A*'s position in the IR reference
225: frame in order to measure or constrain its emission. With no
226: stationary source identified in this region, we conclude that
227: Sgr A* has not been detected.
228:
229: \subsection{Flux Density Limits for Sgr A*}\label{limits}
230: In order to determine an accurate detection limit at the
231: position of Sgr A*, it is necessary to remove the
232: contaminating seeing halos from nearby sources. A `stars
233: only' map is created using the PSF model and list of stars
234: generated by StarFinder. This is then subtracted from the
235: original map, producing a residual map. With the residual
236: map, a 3$\sigma$ point source detection limit for Sgr A* is
237: established based on three times the RMS of 25 aperture
238: photometry values, which are calculated using $\sim$60 mas
239: radius apertures and sky annuli extending from $\sim$60 mas to
240: $\sim$90 mas. The 5$\times$5 grid of apertures in the residual
241: map corresponds to an area of $\sim$0\farcs6$\times$0\farcs6,
242: more than two orders of magnitude larger than the uncertainty
243: in the location of Sgr A*.
244:
245: Zero points are obtained through carrying out the same
246: aperture photometry in the original maps (prior to the `stars
247: only' subtraction) on all known non-variable sources brighter
248: than K=10.5,using the flux densities reported in
249: \citet{blum96}, and that occur in more than 30\% of the frames
250: for each night. The photometric calibration sources used are
251: IRS 16NW, 16C, 16CC, and 16NE, when the FOV allows its
252: inclusion; IRS 29N is omitted as it is found to be marginally
253: variable at the 2$\sigma$ level. Typical photometric zero
254: point 1$\sigma$ uncertainties of $\sim$0.04 mag result from
255: this procedure.
256:
257: Table \ref{datesobs} and Figure \ref{magvstime} contain the
258: resulting 3$\sigma$ point source detection limits for Sgr A*.
259: The lowest of these upper limits gives an observed limit for
260: the quiescent state of Sgr A* of 0.09$\pm$0.005 mJy, or,
261: equivalently, a dereddened value of 2.0$\pm$0.1 mJy, while the
262: highest limit constrains our analysis of the variable state of
263: Sgr A* to $\lesssim$0.8 mJy (observed) or 19 mJy (dereddened).
264: Although these upper limits vary significantly from epoch to
265: epoch (due to variable observing conditions and/or a variation
266: in the number of contaminating sources detected and removed)
267: the lowest of them is lower than the best previously reported
268: limits at 2\micron~ for Sgr A*'s quiescent state (dereddened 4
269: mJy; \citealt{genz99}) by a factor of 2.
270:
271: \section{Discussion}\label{results}
272: Using the coverage of the X-ray and near-infrared experiments
273: and assuming random 3-hr flaring events that produce both
274: enhanced X-ray and near-infrared emission, we consider the
275: likelihood that a near-infrared flare in excess of our weakest
276: limit occurred over the course of the IR experiment. The
277: probability of seeing such a flare is given by the following
278: binomial distribution:
279: \begin{equation} \label{binomial}
280: P(\textrm{$\nu$ detections in $n$ trials}) =
281: \frac{n!}{\nu!(n-\nu)!}p^{\nu}q^{n-\nu}
282: \end{equation}
283: where $p$ is the probability of detecting a flare in one trial
284: and $q$ is the probability of no detection (1-$p$). Here we
285: will refer to $p$ as the duty cycle and note that in our
286: context, this quantity describes what fraction of a set of
287: 3-hr images should contain a flare. Figure \ref{duty_cycle}
288: shows the probability distributions as a function of
289: underlying duty cycle for both the X-ray experiment, in which
290: $\nu$=1 and $n$=7.6 (obtained by dividing the total time, 76
291: ksec, by the length of the observed X-ray flare, 10 ksec) and
292: the near-infrared experiment, in which $\nu$=0 and n=25. The
293: X-ray and near-infrared probability distributions have only a
294: small overlap, which suggests that if the flaring activity at
295: X-ray and near-infrared wavelengths are coupled, a flare most
296: likely occurred during the near-infrared experiment. The
297: joint probability distribution quantifies this and suggests
298: there is, at most, a probability of 9\% of a random 3-hr
299: near-infrared flare in excess of 19 mJy (dereddened). We
300: therefore assume that at the 2$\sigma$ confidence level, a
301: flare occurred during our experiment and use our limits to
302: constrain the variability models.
303:
304: While only a limited amount of modeling of the recent 3-hr
305: X-ray flare detected at Sgr A* has been carried out, existing
306: models predict 2\micron ~dereddened emission as high as 300
307: mJy in the model preferred by \citet{mark01} but as small as
308: 0.4 mJy in \citet{liu02}. The former model explains the
309: elevated X-ray emission, produced by synchrotron self-Compton,
310: by an enhanced temperature for the relativistic electron
311: population, as might arise in a magnetic reconnection
312: event. On the other hand, Liu \& Melia present a flare model
313: in which the flare arises due to an enhanced accretion rate
314: and bremsstrahlung emission is dominant at both near-infrared
315: and X-ray wavelengths. The lack of a near-infrared detection
316: of Sgr A* makes the \citet{mark01} model and any other
317: mechanism that produces flared 2\micron ~emission in excess of
318: 19 mJy (dereddened) unlikely.
319:
320: \section{Conclusions}\label{conclus}
321: This paper summarizes a search for a near-infrared counterpart
322: to Sgr A* in the flared state. From the length of our
323: observations, this search was sensitive to variability on time
324: scales of 3 hours. No such counterpart was detected. However,
325: by identifying and removing all the stars in the crowded inner
326: $\sim$0\farcs6$\times$0\farcs6 of the Galactic Center, an
327: upper limit for the emission from Sgr A* has been inferred for
328: each observation epoch. These limits constrain the quiescent
329: emission from Sgr A* to $\lesssim$0.09 mJy (2.0 mJy,
330: dereddened) and the variable component to $\lesssim$0.8 mJy
331: (19 mJy, dereddened) at the 2$\sigma$ confidence level. More
332: X-ray data will improve the estimated flaring duty cycle and
333: is likely to increase the confidence level of our limits for
334: the near-infrared component of the flared emission.
335:
336: \acknowledgments Valuable input on the manuscript was
337: contributed by Gaspard Duch\^{e}ne, Caer McCabe, and Andreas
338: Eckart. Data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
339: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership
340: among the California Institute of Technology, the University
341: of California and the National Aeronautics and Space
342: Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the
343: generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. This
344: work was supported by the NSF both through grant No. 9988397
345: and the Science and Technology Center for Adaptive Optics,
346: managed by the University of California at Santa Cruz under
347: cooperative agreement No. AST - 9876783. AMG also thanks the
348: Packard Foundation for its support.
349:
350: \begin{thebibliography}{}
351: \bibitem[Baganoff \etal(2001a)]{bag01a} Baganoff, F.~K.~et
352: al.\ 2001a, \nat, 413, 45
353: \bibitem[Baganoff \etal(2001b)]{bag01b} Baganoff, F.~K.~et
354: al.\ 2001b, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0102151)
355: \bibitem[Blum, Sellgren, \& Depoy(1996)]{blum96} Blum, R.~D.,
356: Sellgren, K., \& Depoy, D.~L.\ 1996, \apj, 470, 864
357: \bibitem[Christou(1991)]{christ91} Christou, J.~C.\ 1991,
358: \pasp, 103, 1040
359: \bibitem[Close, McCarthy, \& Melia(1995)]{close95} Close,
360: L.~M., McCarthy, D.~W., \& Melia, F.\ 1995, \apj, 439, 682
361: \bibitem[Diolaiti \etal(2000)]{diolaiti00} Diolaiti, E.,
362: Bendinelli, O., Bonaccini, D., Close, L., Currie, D., \&
363: Parmeggiani, G.\ 2000, \aaps, 147, 335
364: \bibitem[Eckart \& Genzel(1997)]{eckart97} Eckart, A.~\&
365: Genzel, R.\ 1997, \mnras, 284, 576
366: \bibitem[Eckart \etal(1995)]{eckart95} Eckart, A., Genzel, R.,
367: Hofmann, R., Sams, B.~J., \& Tacconi-Garman, L.~E.\ 1995,
368: \apjl, 445, L23
369: \bibitem[Genzel \& Eckart(1999)]{genz99} Genzel, R.~\& Eckart,
370: A.\ 1999, ASP Conf.~Ser.~186: The Central Parsecs of the
371: Galaxy, 3
372: \bibitem[Genzel \etal(1997)]{genz97} Genzel, R., Eckart, A.,
373: Ott, T., \& Eisenhauer, F.\ 1997, \mnras, 291, 219
374: \bibitem[Genzel \etal(2000)]{genz00} Genzel, R., Pichon, C.,
375: Eckart, A., Gerhard, O.~E., \& Ott, T.\ 2000, \mnras, 317,
376: 348
377: \bibitem[Gezari \etal(2002)]{suvi02}Gezari, S., Ghez, A.~M.,
378: Becklin, E.~E., Larkin, J., McLean, I.~S., Morris,
379: M. (2002), \apj, in press (astro-ph/0205186)
380: \bibitem[Ghez \etal(1998)]{ghez98} Ghez, A.~M., Klein, B.~L.,
381: Morris, M., \& Becklin, E.~E.\ 1998, \apj, 509, 678
382: \bibitem[Ghez \etal(2000)]{ghez00} Ghez, A.~M., Morris, M.,
383: Becklin, E.~E., Tanner, A., \& Kremenek, T.\ 2000, \nat,
384: 407, 349
385: \bibitem[Ghez \etal(2002)]{ghez02} Ghez, A.~M. \etal~2002, in
386: preparation
387: \bibitem[Herbst, Beckwith, \& Shure(1993)]{herbst93} Herbst,
388: T.~M., Beckwith, S.~V.~W., \& Shure, M.\ 1993, \apjl, 411,
389: L21
390: \bibitem[Liu \& Melia(2002)]{liu02} Liu, S.~\& Melia, F.\
391: 2002, \apjl, 566, L77
392: \bibitem[Markoff \etal(2001)]{mark01} Markoff, S., Falcke, H.,
393: Yuan, F., \& Biermann, P.~L.\ 2001, \aap, 379, L13
394: \bibitem[Matthews \etal(1996)]{matt96} Matthews, K., Ghez,
395: A.~M., Weinberger, A.~J., \& Neugebauer, G.\ 1996, \pasp,
396: 108, 615
397: \bibitem[Matthews \& Soifer(1994)]{matt94} Matthews, K. \&
398: Soifer, B.T. 1994, Infrared Astronomy with Arrays: The Next
399: Generation, I. McLean ed. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
400: Publishers), 239
401: \bibitem[McLean \etal(1998)]{mclean98} McLean, I.~S.~\etal\
402: 1998, \procspie, 3354, 566
403: \bibitem[Melia \& Falcke(2001)]{melia01} Melia, F.~\& Falcke,
404: H.\ 2001, \araa, 39, 309
405: \bibitem[Menten \etal(1997)]{menten97} Menten, K.~M., Reid,
406: M.~J., Eckart, A., \& Genzel, R.\ 1997, \apjl, 475, L111
407: \bibitem[Morris \etal(2001)]{morris01} Morris, M., Tanner,
408: A.~M., Ghez, A.~M., Becklin, E.~E., Cotera, A., Werner,
409: M.~W., \& Ressler, M.~E.\ 2001, American Astronomical
410: Society Meeting, 198, 4101
411: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rieke85} Rieke, G.~H.~\&
412: Lebofsky, M.~J.\ 1985, \apj, 288, 618
413: \bibitem[Stolovy \etal(1999)]{stol99} Stolovy, S.~R.,
414: McCarthy, D.~W., Melia, F., Rieke, G., Rieke, M.~J., \&
415: Yusef-Zadeh, F.\ 1999, ASP Conf.~Ser.~186: The Central
416: Parsecs of the Galaxy, 39
417: \bibitem[Wizinowich \etal(2000)]{wiz00a} Wizinowich,
418: P.~L.~\etal\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 315
419: \bibitem[Wizinowich(2000)]{wiz00b} Wizinowich, P.~L.\ 2000,
420: \procspie, 4007,
421: \bibitem[Zhao, Bower, \& Goss(2001)]{zhao01} Zhao, J., Bower,
422: G.~C., \& Goss, W.~M.\ 2001, \apjl, 547, L29
423:
424: \end{thebibliography}
425:
426: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
427: \tablenum{1}
428: \label{datesobs}
429: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
430: \tablecaption{Near-Infrared Limits on Sagittarius A*}
431: \tablewidth{0pt}
432: \tablehead{
433: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{PSF
434: Characteristics} & \colhead{} &\colhead{} \\
435: \cline{4-6}
436: \colhead{Epoch (UT)} &
437: \colhead{Camera} &
438: \colhead{\# frames} &
439: \colhead{FWHM$_{core}$ (\arcsec)} &
440: \colhead{FWHM$_{halo}$ (\arcsec)} &
441: \colhead{E$_{core}$ (\%)\tablenotemark{a}} &
442: \colhead{Limit (mag)\tablenotemark{b}} &
443: \colhead{Limit (mJy)\tablenotemark{b}}
444: }
445: \startdata
446: 1995 Jun 11 & NIRC & 2716 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 3 & 15.87 & 6.5\\
447: 1996 Jun 25 & NIRC & 3866 & 0.06 & 0.5 & 1 & 13.71\tablenotemark{c} & 47.5\tablenotemark{c}\\
448: 1996 Jun 27 & NIRC & 1600 & 0.06 & 0.4 & 2 & 14.73 & 18.6\\
449: 1997 May 14 & NIRC & 2800 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 1 & 15.67 & 7.8\\
450: 1998 Apr 2 & NIRC & 2744 & 0.05 & 0.4 & 2 & 15.01 & 14.3\\
451: 1998 May 14 & NIRC & 3436 & 0.05 & 0.4 & 1 & 14.79 & 17.5\\
452: 1998 May 15 & NIRC & 6468 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 2 & 16.31 & 4.3\\
453: 1998 Aug 4 & NIRC & 4241 & 0.05 & 0.4 & 2 & 15.33 & 10.7\\
454: 1998 Aug 5 & NIRC & 6272 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 3 & 16.62 & 3.3\\
455: 1999 May 2 & NIRC & 7722 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 2 & 15.96 & 6.0\\
456: 1999 May 3 & NIRC & 1764 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 2 & 15.85 & 6.6\\
457: 1999 May 4 & NIRC & 1960 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 2 & 15.36 & 10.4\\
458: 1999 May 27 & KCAM+AO& 15 & 0.08 & 0.2 &38 & 17.02 & 2.6\\
459: 1999 Jun 28 & KCAM+AO& 58 & 0.08 & 0.2 &41 & 16.94 & 2.8\\
460: 1999 Jul 24 & NIRC & 5677 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 4 & 17.17 & 2.0\\
461: 1999 Jul 24 & KCAM+AO& 43 & 0.11 & 0.2 &35 & 16.33 & 4.9\\
462: 2000 Apr 21 & NIRC & 2744 & 0.05 & 0.5 & 1 & 14.20\tablenotemark{c} & 30.4\tablenotemark{c}\\
463: 2000 May 19 & NIRC & 8232 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 3 & 16.43 & 3.9\\
464: 2000 May 20 & NIRC & 6860 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 4 & 16.53 & 3.5\\
465: 2000 Jun 21 & SCAM+AO& 215 & 0.08 & 0.2 &26 & 15.41 & 9.9\\
466: 2000 Jun 22 & SCAM+AO& 54 & 0.08 & 0.2 &24 & 16.84 & 2.7\\
467: 2000 Jul 19 & NIRC & 5473 & 0.06 & 0.3 & 4 & 16.24 & 4.6\\
468: 2000 Jul 20 & NIRC & 3255 & 0.06 & 0.3 & 5 & 16.35 & 4.2\\
469: 2000 Oct 18 & NIRC & 2286 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 2 & 15.73 & 7.4\\
470: 2001 May 9 & NIRC & 6427 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 3 & 17.03 & 2.2\\
471: 2001 Jul 28 & NIRC & 5684 & 0.05 & 0.2 & 5 & 16.61 & 3.3\\
472: 2001 Jul 29 & NIRC & 3920 & 0.05 & 0.3 & 3 & 16.04 & 5.5\\
473: \enddata
474:
475: \tablenotetext{a}{Percentage of total energy contained in the
476: PSF core}
477:
478: \tablenotetext{b}{Column 7 lists observed limits and column 8
479: lists dereddened values using an A$_{v}$=30 with
480: A$_{k}$/A$_{v}$=0.112 and A$_{k'}$/A$_{v}$=0.117
481: \citep{melia01, rieke85}}
482:
483: \tablenotetext{c}{Limits for the two images with halo FWHM
484: $\geq$0\farcs5 are not included in the analysis (see
485: \S\ref{id}).}
486: \end{deluxetable}
487: \clearpage
488:
489: \newpage
490: \figcaption[f1.eps]{Speckle (left) and adaptive optics (right)
491: images from May 1999 of the Galactic Center. The small box
492: indicates a 1\arcsec$\times$1\arcsec ~region centered on
493: Sgr A*, whose approximate position is marked with a cross.
494: Both images are displayed with a histogram equalization
495: stretch to show the fainter stars in the field and are
496: oriented such that North is up and East is to the
497: left.\label{maps}}
498:
499: \figcaption[f4.eps]{The 3$\sigma$ limiting flux density
500: calculated for Sgr A* for each epoch of observation
501: (corrected for reddening by a factor of $\sim$22.) The
502: lowest limit of 2.0 mJy, a factor of two lower than
503: previously published limits, and the highest limit of 19
504: mJy, constrains Sgr A*'s quiescent and variable states,
505: respectively.\label{magvstime}}
506:
507: \figcaption[f5.eps]{The probability (P$_{n}$) of seeing the
508: number of detected flares ($\nu$) of both this study (0
509: detections) and the Chandra experiment (1 detection;
510: \citealt{bag01a}) for various duty cycles. The low joint
511: probability suggests that if the flaring activity at
512: near-infrared and X-ray wavelengths are coupled, a flare
513: occurred during the near-infrared experiment and is
514: restricted to be lower than our detection limit.
515: \label{duty_cycle}}
516:
517:
518: \clearpage
519: \begin{figure*}
520: \plottwo{f1.eps}{f2.eps}
521: \end{figure*}
522:
523: \begin{figure}
524: \plotone{f4.eps}
525: \end{figure}
526:
527: \begin{figure}
528: \plotone{f5.eps}
529: \end{figure}
530: \end{document}
531: