1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

3: 

4: \newcommand{\hii}{H\,II}

5: \newcommand{\w}{\,$\lambda$\,}

6: \newcommand{\ww}{\,$\lambda\lambda$\,}

7: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\!\mbox{\scriptsize \em eff}}$}

8: \newcommand{\zsun}{$Z_\odot$}

9: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_\odot$}

10: \newcommand{\ebv}{$E(B-V)$}

11: \newcommand{\ew}{$W(H\beta)$}

12: \newcommand{\I}{\,{\sc i}}

13: \newcommand{\II}{\,{\sc ii}}

14: \newcommand{\III}{\,{\sc iii}}

15: \newcommand{\IV}{\,{\sc iv}}

16: 

17: \shorttitle{A late WN star in NGC 300}

18: \shortauthors{Bresolin et al.}

19: \slugcomment{}

20: 

21: \begin{document}

22: 

23: \title{Discovery and quantitative spectral analysis of an Ofpe/WN9

24: (WN11) star in the Sculptor spiral galaxy

25: NGC~300\footnotemark}\footnotetext[1]{Based on observations obtained

26: at the ESO Very Large Telescope [65.N-0389(B) and 67.D-0006(A)].}

27: 

28: \author{Fabio Bresolin}

29: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu HI

30: 96822}

31: \email{bresolin@ifa.hawaii.edu}

32: 

33: \author{Rolf-Peter Kudritzki}

34: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu HI

35: 96822} \email{kud@ifa.hawaii.edu}

36: 

37: \author{Francisco Najarro}

38: \affil{Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 121, 28006

39: Madrid, Spain} \email{najarro@isis.iem.csic.es}

40: 

41: \author{Wolfgang Gieren}

42: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Casilla 160-C,

43: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile} \email{wgieren@coma.cfm.udec.cl}

44: 

45: \and

46: 

47: \author{Grzegorz Pietrzy{\'n}ski}

48: \affil{Universidad de Concepci{\'o}n, Departamento de Fisica, Casilla 160-C,

49: Concepci{\'o}n, Chile and\\ Warsaw University Observatory, Al.

50: Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478, Warsaw, Poland}

51:  \email{pietrzyn@hubble.cfm.udec.cl}

52: 

53: \begin{abstract}

54: We have discovered an Ofpe/WN9 (WN11 following Smith et al.) star in

55: the Sculptor spiral galaxy NGC~300, the first object of this class

56: found outside the Local Group, during a recent spectroscopic survey of

57: blue supergiant stars obtained at the ESO VLT. The light curve over a

58: five-month period in late 1999 displays a variability at the 0.1 mag

59: level. The intermediate resolution spectra (3800-7200~\AA) show a very

60: close resemblance to the Galactic LBV AG Car during minimum.  We have

61: performed a detailed non-LTE analysis of the stellar spectrum, and

62: have derived a chemical abundance pattern which includes H, He, C, N,

63: O, Al, Si and Fe, in addition to the stellar and wind parameters. The

64: derived stellar properties and the He and N surface enrichments are

65: consistent with those of other Local Group WN11 stars in the

66: literature, suggesting a similar quiescent or post-LBV evolutionary

67: status.

68: 

69: 

70: 

71: \end{abstract}

72: 

73: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC 300) --- galaxies:

74: stellar content --- stars: Wolf-Rayet}

75: 

76: %===================================================================================

77: \section{Introduction}

78: 

79: With the new telescopes of the 8-10 meter class stellar astronomy is

80: branching out beyond the Local Group. Ideal targets for our

81: understanding of young stellar populations in distant galaxies are hot

82: massive stars. These objects have strong stellar winds producing broad

83: and easily detectable spectral features distributed over the whole

84: wavelength range from the UV to the IR, and providing unique

85: information on chemical composition, galactic evolution and

86: extragalactic distances. With these perspectives in mind we have

87: recently begun a systematic spectroscopic study of luminous blue stars

88: in galaxies beyond the Local Group, and presented spectral

89: classification and first quantitative results for A supergiants in

90: NGC~3621 (6.7~Mpc, \citealt{bresolin01}) and NGC~300 (2.0~Mpc,

91: \citealt{bresolin02}). Here we report on the discovery and detailed

92: quantitative analysis of the first example of an Ofpe/WN9 star outside

93: of the Local Group. We will present a detailed chemical abundance

94: pattern -- the first in a galaxy beyond the Local Group -- together

95: with stellar parameters and a determination of the stellar wind

96: properties.

97: 

98: The Ofpe/WN9 class was introduced to include objects which show in

99: their spectra high excitation emission lines from He\II\/ and N\III,

100: typical of Of stars, together with low excitation lines from He\I\/

101: and N\II, seen in late WN stars (\citealt{walborn82},

102: \citealt{bohannan89}). Objects of this class have so far been

103: identified in the Galaxy (possibly several stars in the Galactic

104: center: \citealt{allen90}, \citealt{najarro97b},

105: \citealt{figer99}), the LMC (ten stars: \citealt{bohannan89}), M33 (seven

106: stars: \citealt{massey96}, \citealt{crowther97b}) and M31 (one star:

107: \citealt{massey98}).  The importance of Ofpe/WN9 stars as objects in a

108: transitional stage of evolution between O and W-R stars has been

109: recognized in the last decade, and a connection to the LBV class has

110: been suggested, Ofpe/WN9 stars being observed during a quiescent or

111: post-LBV phase (\citealt{crowther97}, \citealt{pasquali97}). Indeed,

112: in at least a couple of instances Ofpe/WN9 stars have been observed to

113: turn into LBVs (R127: \citealt{stahl83}; HDE 269582:

114: \citealt{bohannan89b}).  The LBV AG Car is also known to show an

115: Ofpe/WN9-like spectrum during its hot phase at visual minimum

116: (\citealt{stahl86}).  The discovery of ejected circumstellar nebulae,

117: in some cases measured in a state of expansion, associated with some

118: of the LMC Ofpe/WN9 stars by

119: \citet{nota96} and \citet{pasquali99} brings forward strong evidence

120: for the occurence of violent episodes of mass loss in these stars,

121: similar to the shell-producing, eruptive outbursts of LBVs.

122: 

123: 

124: \citet{smith94} revised and extended the classification of late WN 

125: stars to include lower excitation objects.  In their scheme, stars

126: showing spectra like AG Car at minimum, where no N\III\/ is detected,

127: are reclassified as WN11. Given the spectral resemblance of the NGC

128: 300 star we analyze here to AG Car at visual minimum (see \S~4) we

129: will adopt the WN11 classification for the remainder of this Letter.

130: We describe the observational data in

131: \S~2, and the photometry in \S~3. In \S~4 we present our VLT spectra,

132: together with the stellar and wind properties derived from a

133: quantitative spectral analysis.

134: 

135: 

136: \section{Observations}

137: The data presented here are part of a spectroscopic survey of

138: photometrically selected blue supergiants in the Sculptor spiral

139: galaxy NGC~300 obtained at the VLT with the FORS multiobject

140: spectrograph, and described in detail by \citet{bresolin02}. This

141: latter paper presents spectra obtained in September 2000 in the blue

142: spectral region ($\sim$\,4000-5000~\AA) and used for the spectral

143: classification of about 70 supergiants. The emission-line star

144: analyzed here corresponds to star B-16 of the spectral catalog (see

145: Table~2 and finding charts in the aforementioned paper), a rather

146: isolated bright star apparently not associated with any prominent OB

147: association, star cluster or nebulosity.  The nearest OB association

148: (from the catalog of \citealt{pietrzynski01}) lies at a deprojected

149: distance of $\sim$450 pc. Given the estimated age of 3.8 Myr (\S

150: 4.1) a speed on the order of 100 km/s would be required for the star

151: to reach its current position from this association. This is much

152: larger than the typical stellar random velocities, and comparable to that

153: of Galactic runaway stars.  To the best of our knowledge the star is

154: not included in published listings of emission-line or W-R stars in

155: NGC~300 (\citealt{schild92}, \citealt{breysacher97}, and references

156: therein), and we will refer to it as star B-16.

157: 

158: In a more recent observing run (September 2001), in order to measure

159: the mass-loss rates of blue supergiants in NGC~300 from the H$\alpha$

160: line profile, we secured MOS spectra in the red with a 600 lines\,mm$^{-1}$

161: grating and 1\arcsec\/ slitlets, which, together with the older

162: spectra, provides us with complete coverage at $R\simeq1,000$

163: resolution of the 3800-7200~\AA\/ wavelength range, except for a

164: 50~\AA-wide gap centered at 5025~\AA.  The total exposure time was

165: 13,500\,s for both the blue and the red spectra, while better seeing

166: conditions favored the blue observations. The mass-loss rates we

167: derive for the whole blue supergiant sample will be discussed in a

168: forthcoming paper, and we concentrate here on the single B-16 star.

169: 

170: \section{Photometry}

171: As part of a multi-epoch photometric study of NGC~300 carried out for

172: the discovery and monitoring of Cepheid variables

173: (\citealt{pietrzynski01}, see also \citealt{pietrzynski02}), $BV$

174: photometry from ESO/MPI 2.2m telescope WFI images is available for

175: B-16 covering nearly a one-half year period. The resulting $B$ and $V$

176: light curves are shown in Fig.~\ref{curve}. An apparently irregular

177: variability, on the order of 0.1 mag (peak-to-peak), is detected in

178: both bands, at a significant level above the typical photometric

179: uncertainty of 0.015 mag. The color index remains approximately

180: constant around $B-V=-0.07$.  While {\em bona fide} LBV variables show

181: large amplitude variability on timescales of years

182: (\citealt{stahl01}), partly characterizing the outburst phenomena in

183: these objects, smaller-amplitude variability is observed in Ofpe/WN9

184: stars or LBVs during quiescence (e.g., \citealt{stahl84},

185: \citealt{sterken97}).  Assuming the intrinsic color index from the

186: stellar atmosphere models ($E_{B-V}=0.06$), $R=A_V/E_{B-V}=3.1$ and an

187: average magnitude $V=19.00$, we obtain from the adopted distance

188: modulus for NGC~300, $m-M=26.53$ (\citealt{freedman01}), an absolute

189: magnitude $M_V\simeq-7.72\pm0.13$.

190:  

191: \section{Spectral analysis}

192: The blue and red portions of the rectified VLT optical spectrum are

193: shown in Fig.~\ref{spectrum}. In the top panel we have also

194: superimposed the spectrum of AG Car during minimum, taken from the

195: \citet{walborn00} atlas, in order to illustrate the remarkable

196: similarity between the two spectra. Line identification is provided

197: for most of the recognizable features, which characterize B-16 as a

198: WN11 star.  These include the hydrogen Balmer series lines (pure

199: emission), He\I\/ lines (together with He\II\w4686) and mostly

200: low-excitation metal lines such as N\II, Fe\III\/ and Si\II. P-Cygni

201: profiles are seen in most of the He\I\/ lines, as well as in

202: Si\III\ww4552-4575, N\II\ww4601-4643 and Fe\III\ww5127,5156. The

203: absence of N\III\/ is a discriminant factor against an earlier

204: (WN9-10) classification. The WN11 classification is further confirmed

205: by the observed equivalent widths of He\I\w5876 (32\,\AA) and

206: He\II\w4686 (1\,\AA), compared to those given by \citet{crowther97}.

207: 

208: \subsection{Atmosphere models}

209: 

210: For the quantitative analysis of the stellar spectrum we have used the

211: iterative, non-LTE line blanketing method presented by

212: \citet{hillier98}. The code solves the radiative transfer equation in

213: the co-moving frame for the expanding atmospheres of early-type stars

214: in spherical geometry, subject to the constraints of statistical and

215: radiative equilibrium.  Steady state is assumed, and the density

216: structure is set by the mass-loss rate and the velocity field via the

217: equation of continuity.  The velocity field (\citealt{hillier89}) is

218: characterized by an isothermal effective scale height in the inner

219: atmosphere, and becomes a $\beta$ law in the wind (e.g.,

220: \citealt{lamers96}).  Better fits are obtained if instead of the

221: standard $\beta$ law a combined 2-$\beta$ law is used, where each

222: value of $\beta$ (given in Table~\ref{observations}) characterizes the

223: shape of the velocity field in the inner and outer parts of the wind,

224: respectively.  We allow for the presence of clumping via a clumping

225: law characterized by a volume filling factor $f(r)$, so that the

226: `smooth' mass-loss rate, $\dot{M}_S$, is related to the `clumped'

227: mass-loss rate, $\dot{M}_C$, through $\dot{M}_S =

228: \dot{M}_C/f^{1/2}$.  The model is then prescribed by the stellar

229: radius $R_*$, the stellar luminosity $L_*$, the mass-loss rate

230: $\dot{M}$, the velocity field $v(r)$, the volume filling factor $f$, and

231: the abundances of the elements considered.  The reader is referred to

232: \citet{hillier98,hillier99} for a detailed discussion of the code.

233: 

234: The main stellar parameters of our best-fitting model are summarized

235: in Table~\ref{observations}, whereas fits to some of the most

236: important line diagnostics are illustrated in Fig.~\ref{model}. As can

237: be seen, the majority of the spectral features are well reproduced by

238: the adopted model. The Fe\III\ww5127,5156 lines, together with

239: He\II\w4686, provide excellent constraints for the effective

240: temperature. Using the strength of the electron scattering wings of

241: the Balmer lines we derive a clumping factor $f=0.25$. Thus the

242: "smooth" mass loss rate would be twice the value displayed in

243: Table~\ref{observations}. The parameters describing the stellar wind,

244: i.e., the terminal velocity $v_\infty=325$~km\,s$^{-1}$, the mass-loss

245: rate $\dot{M_C}=4.6\times10^{-5}$~$M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$, and the wind

246: performance number $\eta=\dot{M}v_\infty/(L_*/c)=0.84$, lie in the

247: range found for Local Group WN11 stars (\citealt{crowther97b}).  We

248: estimate the uncertainty in $L$ and $\dot{M_C}/f^{1/2}$ to be

249: approximately 10\% and 30\%, respectively.  As a further comparison,

250: Fig.~\ref{hr} shows the location of star B-16 in the H-R diagram,

251: together with additional WN9-11 stars in the Local Group

252: (\citealt{crowther95}; \citealt{smith95}; \citealt{crowther97b}), as

253: well as LBVs at minimum in the Galaxy (P Cyg: \citealt{pauldrach90};

254: AG Car: \citealt{smith94}) and in the LMC (R71: \citealt{lennon94}).

255: 

256: Table~\ref{abundances} summarizes the model fractional mass

257: abundances. Uncertainties in the latter range between 0.2 dex (He, N,

258: Si and Fe) and 0.3 dex (C, O and Al).  The chemistry of B-16 resembles

259: that of other known Local Group WN9-11 stars.  The severe depletion of

260: hydrogen inferred from our analysis (mass fraction $X=0.27$), and the

261: correspondingly large helium surface abundance (H/He~=~1.5 by number),

262: are fairly typical for late WN stars (H/He~=~0.8-3 by number), and are

263: indicative of heavy mass-loss stripping of the stellar outer layers

264: during the post-main sequence evolution of massive stars. We find a

265: total CNO abundance close to that of Galactic main sequence B stars

266: (\citealt{gies92}, \citealt{kilian92}), consistent with a half solar

267: chemical composition in these elements. This agrees with the empirical

268: O abundance derived for an H~{\sc ii} region located 30\arcsec\/ away

269: (region 5 observed by \citealt{pagel79}). On the other hand, Fe has a

270: roughly solar abundance, suggesting an $\alpha$/Fe ratio different

271: than in the Galaxy. In comparison with the Galactic B star abundance

272: pattern, N is overabundant (by mass) by a factor of 10, while C and O

273: are reduced by factors of $\sim$2 and 6, respectively, although the

274: latter abundances are highly uncertain.

275: 

276: The current evolutionary status of B-16 can be estimated by means of

277: the recent Geneva stellar tracks including rotation

278: (\citealt{meynet00}) with an initial rotational velocity

279: $v_{ini}=300$~km\,s$^{-1}$ and Z~=~0.02 (Fig.~\ref{hr}).  The star's

280: position in the H-R diagram approaches the 60~$M_\odot$ track, and an

281: initial mass of $\sim$55~$M_\odot$ can also be derived from the

282: relation between stellar luminosity and initial mass for WNL stars

283: given by \citet{schaerer92}. From the 60~$M_\odot$ stellar model more

284: closely matching the observed H and He surface abundances we infer an

285: age of 3.8 Myr and a present mass of $\sim$36~$M_\odot$.  At this

286: stage, the predicted N overabundance with respect to the ZAMS

287: abundance is 12 (mostly occuring during the MS phase, as a consequence

288: of rotational mixing), in good agreement with our finding.

289: %With the current

290: %uncertainties, the N/C and N/O ratios are not sufficiently constrained

291: %by the observations for a meaningful comparison with the model

292: %predictions.

293: 

294: According to its He- and N-enriched surface chemistry, B-16 might be

295: in a dormant or post-LBV phase of evolution. This is also indicated by

296: the position in the H-R diagram, well above the Humphreys-Davidson

297: limit (\citealt{humphreys79}), and intermediate between the LBVs

298: AG~Car and P Cygni, which have comparable mass-loss rates to B-16, as

299: well as similar wind performance numbers.  The NGC~300 star shows

300: higher He enrichment at the surface (n$_{He}$/n$_H\simeq0.7$, versus

301: 0.4-0.5 for the LBVs), and a somewhat faster wind (325 versus

302: 185-250~km\,s$^{-1}$; \citealt{najarro97}, \citealt{langer94}), so

303: that a more advanced (post-LBV) state seems more likely.  This picture

304: is in agreement with the conclusions reached by \citet{crowther95} and

305: \citet{crowther97b} regarding the close connection between WN9-11

306: stars and LBVs.

307: 

308: An unexpected reward out of our spectroscopic survey of blue

309: supergiants in NGC~300, the WN11 star B-16 studied here is the first

310: star in this galaxy (and beyond the Local Group) for which we have

311: attempted a detailed quantitative analysis. In the near future the

312: systematic study of the massive stellar population in NGC~300 and

313: similar galaxies within a few Mpc, well within current observational

314: capabilities, will certainly provide new insights into massive stellar

315: evolution and stellar abundances.

316: 

317: 

318: \acknowledgments We thank J. Hillier for providing his code, and

319: G. Meynet for the Geneva stellar evolutionary tracks including

320: rotation.  WG gratefully acknowledges support for this research from

321: the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP No. 15010003. FN

322: acknowlegdes Spanish MCYT PANAYA2000-1784 and Ramon y Cajal grants.

323: 

324: 

325: 

326: %===================================================================================

327: \begin{thebibliography}{}

328: 

329: \bibitem[Allen et al.\/(1990)]{allen90} Allen, D.A., Hyland, A.R., \&

330: Hillier, D.J. 1990, \mnras, 244, 706

331: 

332: \bibitem[Bohannan \& Walborn\/(1989)]{bohannan89} Bohannan, B., \&

333: Walborn, N.R. 1989, \pasp, 101, 520

334: 

335: \bibitem[Bohannan\/(1989)]{bohannan89b} Bohannan, B. 1989, in Physics

336: of Luminous Blue Variables, ed. K. Davidson, A.F.J. Moffat \&

337: H.J.G.L.M. Lamers (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 35

338: 

339: \bibitem[Bresolin et al.\/(2002)]{bresolin02} Bresolin, F., Gieren,

340: W., Kudritzki, R.-P., Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., \& Przybilla, N. 2002, \apj,

341: 567, 277

342: 

343: \bibitem[Bresolin et al.\/(2001)]{bresolin01} Bresolin, F., Kudritzki,

344: R.-P., Mendez, R.H., \& Przybilla, N. 2001, \apj, 548, L159

345: 

346: \bibitem[Breysacher et al.\/(1997)]{breysacher97} Breysacher, J.,

347: Azzopardi, M., Testor, G., \& Muratorio, G. 1997, \aap, 326, 976

348: 

349: \bibitem[Crowther \& Smith\/(1997)]{crowther97} Crowther, P.A., \&

350: Smith, L.J. 1997, \aap, 320, 500

351: 

352: \bibitem[Crowther et al.\/(1997)]{crowther97b} Crowther, P.A.,

353: Szeifert, T., Stahl, O., \& Zickgraf, F.-J. 1997, \aap, 318, 543

354: 

355: \bibitem[Crowther, Hillier \& Smith\/(1995)]{crowther95} Crowther,

356: P.A., Hillier, D.J., \& Smith, L.J. 1995, \aap, 293, 172

357: 

358: \bibitem[Figer et al.\/(1999)]{figer99} Figer, D.F., McLean, I.S., \&

359: Morris, M. 1999, \apj, 514, 202

360: 

361: \bibitem[Freedman et al.\/(2001)]{freedman01} Freedman, W.L., et

362: al. 2001, \apj, 553, 47

363: 

364: \bibitem[Gies \& Lambert\/(1992)]{gies92} Gies, D.R., \& Lambert,

365: D.L. 1992, \apj, 387, 673

366: 

367: \bibitem[Hillier \& Miller\/(1999)]{hillier99} Hillier, D.J., \&

368: Miller, D.L. 1999, \apj, 519, 354

369: 

370: \bibitem[Hillier \& Miller\/(1998)]{hillier98} Hillier, D.J., \&

371: Miller, D.L. 1998, \apj, 496, 407

372: 

373: \bibitem[Hillier\/(1989)]{hillier89} Hillier, D.J. 1989, \apj, 347,

374: 392

375: 

376: \bibitem[Humphreys \& Davidson\/(1979)]{humphreys79} Humphreys,

377: R.M., \& Davidson, K. 1979, \apj, 232, 409

378: 

379: \bibitem[Kilian\/(1992)]{kilian92} Kilian, J. 1992, \aap, 262, 171

380: 

381: \bibitem[Lamers et al.\/(1996)]{lamers96} Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Najarro,

382: F., Kudritzki, R.P., Morris, P.W., Voors, R.H.M., van Gent, J.I.,

383: Waters, L.B.F.M., de Graauw, T., Beintema, D., Valentijn, E.A., \&

384: Hillier, D.J. 1996, \aap, 315, 229

385: 

386: \bibitem[Langer et al.\/(1994)]{langer94} Langer, N., Hamann, W.-R.,

387: Lennon, M., Najarro, F., Pauldrach, A.W.A., \& Puls, J. 1994, \aap,

388: 290, 819

389: 

390: \bibitem[Lennon et al.\/(1994)]{lennon94} Lennon, D.J., Wobig, D.,

391: Kudritzki, R.-P., \& Stahl, O. 1994, in Evolution of Massive Stars: A

392: Confrontation between Theory and Observation, eds. D. Vanbeveren,

393: W. van Rensbergen \& C. de Loore, Space Sci. Rev. 66, 207

394: 

395: \bibitem[Massey et al.\/(2001)]{massey01} Massey, P., Waterhouse,

396: E., \& DeGioia-Eastwood, K. 2001, \aj, 119, 2214

397: 

398: \bibitem[Massey \& Johnson\/(1998)]{massey98} Massey, P., \& Johnson,

399: O. 1998, \apj, 505, 793

400: 

401: \bibitem[Massey et al.\/(1996)]{massey96} Massey, P., Bianchi, L.,

402: Hutchings, J.B., \& Stecher, T.P. 1996, \apj, 469, 629

403: 

404: \bibitem[Meynet \& Maeder\/(2000)]{meynet00} Meynet, G., \& Maeder,

405: A. 2000, \aap, 361, 101

406: 

407: \bibitem[Meynet et al.\/(1994)]{meynet94} Meynet, G., Maeder, A.,

408: Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., \& Charbonnel, C. 1994, \aaps, 103, 97

409: 

410: \bibitem[Najarro, Hillier \& Stahl\/(1997)]{najarro97} Najarro, F.,

411: Hillier, D.J., \& Stahl, O. 1997, \aap, 326, 1117

412: 

413: \bibitem[Najarro et al.\/(1997)]{najarro97b} Najarro. F., Krabbe, A., 

414: Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Kudritzki, R.P., \& Hillier, D.J. 1997, \aap,

415: 325, 700

416: 

417: \bibitem[Nota et al.\/(1996)]{nota96} Nota, A., Pasquali, A., Drissen,

418: L., Leitherer, C., Robert, C., Moffat, A.F.J., \& Schmutz, W. 1996,

419: \apjs, 102, 383

420: 

421: \bibitem[Pagel et al.\/(1979)]{pagel79} Pagel, B.E.J., Edmunds, M.G.,

422: Blackwell, D.E., Chun, M.S., \& Smith, G. 1979, \mnras, 189, 95

423: 

424: \bibitem[Pasquali et al.\/(1999)]{pasquali99} Pasquali, A., Nota,

425: A., \& Clampin, M. 1999, \aap, 343, 536

426: 

427: \bibitem[Pasquali et al.\/(1997)]{pasquali97} Pasquali, A., Langer,

428: N., Schmutz, W., Leitherer, C., Nota, A., Hubeny, I., \& Moffat,

429: F.J. 1997, \apj, 478, 340

430: 

431: \bibitem[Pauldrach \& Puls\/(1990)]{pauldrach90} Pauldrach, A.W.A., \&

432: Puls, J. 1990, \aap, 237, 409

433: 

434: \bibitem[Pietrzy\'{n}ski et al.\/(2002)]{pietrzynski02}

435: Pietrzy\'{n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Fouqu\'{e}, P., \& Pont, F. 2002, \aj,

436: 123, 789

437: 

438: \bibitem[Pietrzy\'{n}ski et al.\/(2001)]{pietrzynski01}

439: Pietrzy\'{n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Fouqu\'{e}, P., \& Pont, F. 2001,

440: \aap, 371, 497

441: 

442: \bibitem[Schaerer \& Maeder\/(1992)]{schaerer92} Schaerer, D., \&

443: Maeder, A. 1992, \aap, 263, 129

444: 

445: \bibitem[Schild \& Testor\/(1992)]{schild92} Schild, H., \& Testor,

446: G. 1992, \aap, 266, 145

447: 

448: \bibitem[Smith, Crowther \& Willis\/(1995)]{smith95} Smith, L.J.,

449: Crowther, P.A., \& Willis, A.J. 1995, \aap, 302, 830

450: 

451: \bibitem[Smith et al.\/(1994)]{smith94} Smith, L.J., Crowther, P.A., \&

452: Prinja, R.K. 1994, \aap, 281, 833

453: 

454: \bibitem[Stahl et al.\/(2001)]{stahl01} Stahl, O., Jankovics, I.,

455: Kov\'{a}cs, J., Wolf, B., Schmutz, W., Kaufer, A., Rivinius, T., \&

456: Szeifert, T. 2001, \aap, 375, 54

457: 

458: \bibitem[Stahl\/(1986)]{stahl86} Stahl, O. 1986, \aap, 164, 321

459: 

460: \bibitem[Stahl et al.\/(1984)]{stahl84} Stahl, O., Wolf, B.,

461: Leitherer, C., Zickgraf, F.-J., Krautter, J., \& de Groot, M. 1984,

462: \aap, 140, 459

463: 

464: \bibitem[Stahl et al.\/(1983)]{stahl83} Stahl, O., Wolf, B., Klare,

465: G., Cassatella, A., Krautter, J., Persi, P., \& Ferrari-Toniolo,

466: M. 1983, \aap, 127, 49

467: 

468: \bibitem[Sterken et al.\/(1997)]{sterken97} Sterken, C., van Genderen,

469: A.M., \& de Groot, M. 1997, in ASP Con. Series 120, Luminous Blue

470: Variables: Massive Stars in Transition, ed. A. Nota \&

471: H.J.G.L.M. Lamers (San Francisco: ASP), 35

472: 

473: \bibitem[Walborn \& Fitzpatrick\/(2000)]{walborn00} Walborn, N.R., \&

474: Fitzpatrick, E.L. 2000, \pasp, 112, 50

475: 

476: \bibitem[Walborn\/(1982)]{walborn82} Walborn, N.R. 1982, \apj, 256, 45

477: 

478: \end{thebibliography}

479: 

480: 

481: \epsscale{1.0}

482: \begin{figure}

483: \plotone{f1.eps}

484: \caption{$B$ and $V$ light curves for NGC~300 star B-16, spanning an

485: approximately five month period between September 1999 and January

486: 2000. The $B-V$ color index is shown in the top panel, the $V$ (full

487: dots) and $B$ (open triangles) magnitudes in the bottom panel.

488: Photometric errors ($\sim$0.015 mag) are comparable to the size of the

489: dots. \label{curve}}

490: \end{figure}

491: 

492: \epsscale{1.0}

493: \begin{figure}

494: \plotone{f2.eps}

495: \caption{Rectified VLT/FORS optical spectra obtained at blue (top) and red

496: (bottom) wavelengths. Line identification is provided in the top

497: section of each panel. The comparison spectrum of AG Car at visual

498: minimum (courtesy N. Walborn and E. Fitzpatrick) is shown as a dashed

499: line superimposed on top of the blue spectrum of star B-16.

500: \label{spectrum}}

501: \end{figure}

502: 

503: \epsscale{0.9}

504: \begin{figure}

505: \plotone{f3.eps}

506: \caption{Different spectral diagnostics in the observed spectrum of

507: B-16 compared to our best fit model (dashed line), convolved with a

508: Gaussian profile to match the spectral resolution of the data.

509: \label{model}}

510: \end{figure}

511: 

512: \epsscale{1.0}

513: \begin{figure}

514: \plotone{f4.eps}

515: \caption{Location of B-16 in the H-R diagram (full circle), plotted

516: together with additional WN11 stars (open circles, labeled) and WN9-10

517: stars (open triangles; from Crowther et al.~1995; Smith et al.~1995;

518: \citealt{crowther97b}), as well as LBVs at minimum (open stars,

519: labeled) in the Milky Way (P Cyg: \citealt{pauldrach90}; AG Car:

520: \citealt{smith94}) and in the LMC (R71: \citealt{lennon94}). We

521: include the Humphreys-Davidson limit (dashed line), and the

522: theoretical Geneva stellar tracks including rotation ($v_{ini}=300$

523: km\,s$^{-1}$) at solar metallicity, for $M=40~M_\odot$ and

524: $60~M_\odot$ (dotted lines). These tracks are plotted from the

525: zero-age main sequence to the point where the fractional mass of

526: hydrogen $X\simeq0.20$.

527: \label{hr}}

528: \end{figure}

529: 

530: %\clearpage

531: \input{table1}

532: \input{table2}

533: %\newpage

534: 

535: \end{document}

536: