1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{../../egg/ISO/aastex}

3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

4: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

5: %% Produces an emulated ApJ-style looking paper

6: %\documentstyle[11pt,/cis/faculty/jhkpci/tex/papers/Chandra/BD+30/aasms4]{article}

7: 

8: \usepackage{graphics,graphicx}

9: 

10: \def\plotone#1{\centering \leavevmode

11: \epsfxsize=\textwidth \epsfbox{#1}}

12: \def\plottwo#1#2{\centering \leavevmode

13: \epsfxsize=.45\textwidth \epsfbox{#1} \hfil

14: \epsfxsize=.45\textwidth \epsfbox{#2}}

15: \def\plotfiddle#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{\centering \leavevmode

16: \vbox to#2{\rule{0pt}{#2}}

17: \special{psfile=#1 voffset=#7 hoffset=#6 vscale=#5 hscale=#4 angle=#3}}

18: 

19: \def \yskip{\penalty-50\vskip3pt plus 3pt minus 2pt}

20: \def \reference{\par \yskip \noindent \hangindent .4in \hangafter 1}

21: \def \abc#1#2#3#4 {\reference#1, {\sl#2}, {\bf#3}, #4}

22: \def \blank {\lower 5pt\hbox to 0.75in{\hrulefill}}

23: \def \kms{\rm{km}~$\rm{s}^{-1}$}

24: \def \cc{$\rm{cm}^{-3}$}

25: \def \msyr{$M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$}

26: \def \cm{~\rm{cm}}

27: \def \s{~\rm{s}}

28: \def \km{~\rm{km}}

29: \def \kms{$~\rm{km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$}

30: \def \gm{\rm{gm}}

31: \def \K{~\rm{K}}

32: \def \g{~\rm{g}}

33: \def \AU{~\rm{AU}}

34: \def \ergs{~\rm{ergs}}

35: \def \erg{~\rm{erg}}

36: \def \yrs{~\rm{yrs}}

37: \def \yr{~\rm{yr}}

38: \def \pc{~\rm{pc}}

39: \def \kpc{~\rm{kpc}}

40: %

41: \def \lesssim{\mathrel{<\kern-1.0em\lower0.9ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

42: \def \gtrsim{\mathrel{>\kern-1.0em\lower0.9ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

43: 

44: \begin{document}

45: 

46: \title{ROSAT X-ray Spectral Properties of Nearby Young

47: Associations: \\ TW Hydrae, Tucana-Horologium, and the

48: $\beta$ Pic Moving Group} 

49: 

50: \author{Joel H. Kastner\altaffilmark{1}, Lara

51: Crigger\altaffilmark{1}, 

52: Margaret Rich\altaffilmark{1,2},

53: and David A. Weintraub\altaffilmark{3}}

54: \altaffiltext{1}{Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging

55: Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, 54 Lomb Memorial

56: Dr., Rochester, NY, 14623, U.S.A.; JHK's email: jhk@cis.rit.edu}

57: \altaffiltext{2}{Rush-Henrietta Senior High School, 1799 Lehigh Station Rd.,

58: Henrietta, NY, 14467, U.S.A.}

59: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept.\ of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University,

60: Nashville, TN, 37235, U.S.A.; david.weintraub@vanderbilt.edu}

61: 

62: \begin{abstract}

63: We present archival ROSAT data for three recently

64: identified, nearby ($D<70$ pc), young ($\sim10-40$ Myr)

65: stellar associations: the TW Hydrae Association, the Tucana-Horologium

66: Association, and the $\beta$ Pic Moving Group. The

67: distributions of ROSAT X-ray hardness ratios (HR1, HR2) for

68: these three groups, whose membership is dominated by

69: low-mass, weak-lined T Tauri stars, are tightly clustered

70: and very similar to one another. The value of HR1 for TW Hya

71: itself --- the only {\it bona fide} classical T Tauri star

72: in any of the nearby groups --- is clearly anomalous among

73: these nearby young stars. We compare the hardness ratio

74: distributions of stars in the three nearby groups with those

75: of T Tauri stars, the Hyades, and main sequence dwarfs in

76: the field. This comparison demonstrates that the X-ray spectra

77: of F through M stars soften with age, and that F

78: and G stars evolve more rapidly in X-ray spectral hardness

79: than do K and M stars. It is as yet unclear

80: whether this trend can be attributed to age-dependent

81: changes in the intrinsic X-ray spectra of stars of type F and later,

82: to a decrease in the column density of circumstellar gas

83: (e.g., in residual protoplanetary disks), or to the

84: diminishing contributions of star-disk interactions to X-ray

85: emission. Regardless, these results demonstrate that

86: analysis of archival ROSAT X-ray spectral data can help both

87: to identify nearby, young associations and to ascertain the

88: X-ray emission properties of members of known associations.

89: \end{abstract}

90: 

91: \keywords{stars: Xrays --- stars: T Tauri: individual (TW

92: Hya) --- stars: evolution --- open clusters and

93: associations: individual (TW Hya Association, Tucana

94: Association, Horologium

95: Association, $\beta$ Pic Moving Group)} 

96: 

97: \section{Introduction}

98: 

99: The recent discovery of several groups of young ($\sim5-40$

100: Myr) stars within 100 pc of the Sun has given new direction

101: to the field of star and planet formation (Jayawardhana \&

102: Greene 2001). The seminal nearby, young stellar group is the

103: TW Hydrae Association (TWA), which lies only $\sim50$ pc

104: from Earth (Kastner et al.\ 1997), is $\sim5-10$ Myr old

105: (Weintraub et al.\ 2000), and has $\sim20$ known member star

106: systems (Webb et al.\ 1999; Zuckerman et al.\ 2001c

107: [hereafter Zc]). Several dozen additional, recently

108: identified TWA candidate systems are listed in Makarov \&

109: Fabricius (2001) and Webb (2001). Other examples are the

110: very nearby $\beta$ Pictoris Moving Group (bPMG; $D \sim 36$

111: pc, age $\sim12$ Myr; Zuckerman et al.\ 2001a [hereafter

112: Za]; Ortega et al.\ 2002), and the Tucana and Horologium

113: Associations (each $D \sim 40$ pc, age $\sim30$ Myr; Torres

114: et al.\ 2000; Zuckerman \& Webb 2000; Zuckerman et al.\

115: 2001b [hereafter Zb]). Each of these groups consists of

116: $\sim20$ known and candidate member star systems. Based on

117: their adjacent positions and their similar distances, space

118: motions, and ages, Zb and de la Reza et al.\ (2001) have

119: proposed that the Tucana and Horologium Associations

120: constitute a single, young stellar group. We adopt this

121: suggestion in the remainder of this paper, and we designate

122: the combined group as the Tucana-Horologium Association

123: (T-HA).

124:  

125: In many respects systems such as the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG,

126: though only recently identified and still in a rapid state

127: of flux, are better suited to detailed studies of star and

128: planet formation than more distant, well-studied

129: star-forming regions like the Orion and Taurus molecular

130: clouds.  Unlike T Tauri stars in regions of active star

131: formation, the nearby groups typically are not readily

132: associated with parent molecular clouds and, as a result,

133: there remains considerable uncertainty concerning their

134: origin and evolutionary status (see reviews in Jayawardhana

135: \& Greene 2001).  Indeed, the approximate age range of the

136: TWA stars, and consequently the identification of this group

137: as a nearby association, was initially ascertained by

138: Kastner et al.\ (1997) largely through the strength of the

139: stars' X-ray emission.  The TWA's estimated age of about 10

140: Myr makes the association especially intriguing, since this

141: age corresponds to the epoch of Jovian planet formation,

142: according to present theory, and is a defining

143: characteristic of post-T Tauri stars (Herbig 1978). The

144: stars in the TWA and other nearby young associations,

145: therefore, likely represent a long-sought missing link

146: between the very young and well-studied T Tauri stage and

147: the stellar main sequence (Jensen 2001).

148: 

149: As a consequence of the proximity of the TWA, X-ray observations of

150: its members (and of TW Hya in particular) have yielded new insight

151: into the origin of high-energy emission from young stars.  

152: Archival data from the Roentgen Satellite (ROSAT) demonstrate that the

153: $\sim10$ Myr age of the TWA represents an especially X-ray-luminous epoch in

154: the early evolution of solar-mass stars (Kastner et al.\ 1997), and

155: X-ray (ASCA and ROSAT) spectral monitoring suggests the

156: optical and X-ray variability of

157: some classical T Tauri stars is due to a combination

158: of short-term flaring and long-term variations in absorbing column

159: (Kastner et al.\ 1999).  Chandra/HETGS (High Energy

160: Transmission Gratings Spectrograph) observations of TW Hya itself

161: produced the first high-resolution X-ray spectrum of a T Tauri star

162: (Kastner et al.\ 2002).  The HETG spectra yield unexpected results for

163: plasma density, temperature, and elemental abundances which, taken together,

164: suggest that the X-ray emission from TW Hya may arise

165: from accretion rather than from coronal activity. If so, this would

166: suggest that many other X-ray luminous young stars derive part or

167: most of their X-ray luminosity from accretion or other

168: star-disk interactions, although coronal

169: activity remains the widely accepted mechanism for such emission (e.g.,

170: Feigelson \& Montmerle 1999).

171: 

172: Motivated by these results, we are conducting an archival study of

173: ROSAT data that focuses on the TWA and other nearby stellar

174: groups. Our goal is to establish the gross X-ray spectral properties

175: of nearby post-T Tauri stars. Such data, when compared with similar

176: results already available for T Tauri stars embedded in molecular

177: clouds (e.g., Neuhauser et al.\ 1995) and for main-sequence field

178: stars (e.g., Fleming et al.\ 1995), should offer clues to

179: the evolutionary status of stars 

180: in nearby associations and, more generally, to the mechanism(s)

181: responsible for the bright X-ray emission that appears ubiquitous

182: among young (age $\le 100$ Myr), solar-mass stars. Here, we present an

183: analysis of ROSAT Position-Sensitive Proportional Counter data

184: available for the known members of the TWA, the TA, and the bPMG. These

185: results strengthen the interpretation that the 

186: stars in these and other nearby, dispersed young associations

187: constitute a transition stage between cloud-embedded T Tauri stars and

188: main sequence stars.

189: 

190: \section{Data}

191: 

192: Data presented here consist of ROSAT

193: Position-Sensitive Proportional Counter (PSPC) X-ray

194: hardness ratios, as catalogued in the RASS Bright

195: Source Catalog (BSC; Voges et al.\ 1999)\footnote{These ROSAT data

196: were obtained through the 

197: the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center, a service of

198: the Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics at NASA/GSFC and 

199: the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the Smithsonian

200: Astrophysical Observatory.}. The ROSAT PSPC was sensitive

201: from about 0.1 to 2.4 keV. Despite the limited spectral

202: resolution of the PSPC ($E/\Delta E \sim 1$), 

203: analysis of PSPC data, and hardness

204: ratios in particular, has proven to be an effective means to

205: understand the X-ray spectral properties of young stars

206: (e.g., Neuhauser et al.\ 1995). As described in Neuhauser et al.,

207: PSPC hardness ratios (hereafter HRs) are constructed

208: from the integrated counts in three different PSPC

209: energy bands (``soft,'' ``hard 1,'' and ``hard 2,'' respectively),

210: spanning the energy (channel) ranges 0.1--0.4 keV (11--41), 

211: 0.4--0.9 keV (52--90), and 0.9--2.0 keV (91--201). Denoting the

212: counts in these three bands as $S$, $H1$, and $H2$,

213: respectively, the two standard ROSAT PSPC HRs are

214: then defined as  

215: $$

216: HR1 = \frac{H1 + H2 - S}{H1 + H2 + S}

217: $$

218: $$

219: HR2 = \frac{H2 - H1}{H2 + H1}.

220: $$

221: 

222: \section{Results}

223: 

224: \subsection{Hardness Ratios of Local Associations}

225: 

226: In Fig.\ 1a, we present PSPC HRs for established members of

227: the TWA, as listed in Zc. With the exception of TW Hya

228: itself, the PSPC HRs of the TWA stars are

229: evidently rather tightly confined. 

230: It is apparent from Fig.\ 1a that, while HR2 for

231: TW Hya itself is typical of TWA stars, the value of

232: HR1 for TW Hya is significantly different from the

233: HR1 values of most other TWA members. This distinction in HR1 is

234: consistent with the unusual ultraviolet through radio

235: spectral properties of TW Hya. Indeed, TW Hya remains the

236: only unambiguous example of a classical T Tauri star among

237: the known TWA membership.

238: 

239: The membership of the T-HA remains remains subject to

240: debate. Here, we adopt the membership proposed by Zb and Za.

241: Specifically, we include all Tucana candidate members in Tables 1

242: and 2 of Zb except for HIP 92024, which was subsumed into

243: the bPMG by Za, and all but five Horologium candidate

244: members listed in Table 5 of Torres et al.\ (2000). The

245: rejected five stars (ERX 14, 16, 45, 49, and 5) were judged

246: by Zb to be too distant to be part of the T-HA; including

247: these five stars in our HR sample would not significantly

248: change the results described below. Seven

249: additional T-HA candidate members proposed by Torres et al.\

250: and Zb, including the infrared-excess object HD 10647, were

251: not detected in the RASS. Most of these stars are of

252: sufficiently early type (F5 and earlier) that they may be

253: intrinsically X-ray-faint (see below). The lack of a

254: RASS X-ray counterpart to the F9 star HD 10647 casts some doubt on its

255: membership in the T-HA, however, given the RASS detections of

256: several other T-HA and bPMG stars of similar spectral type.

257: 

258: With its membership thus defined, the distribution of HRs

259: for the T-HA is quite well confined, and the locus of HRs

260: for the T-HA lies very near that of the TWA (Fig.\ 1b). The

261: same is true for the bPMG (Fig.\ 1c), for which we include all

262: probable and possible members identified by Za. 

263: 

264: In Table 1 we list the

265: mean HRs (and errors on the means) for the TWA, the T-HA,

266: and the bPMG.

267: Aside from HR 4796A (whose M-type companion,

268: HR 4796B, is most likely the X-ray source in this binary

269: system; Jura et al.\ 1998), the known membership

270: of the TWA consists exclusively of K and M stars. The T-HA and

271: bPMG memnership includes a larger proportion of earlier-type stars, and

272: for these two associations we also list separately in Table

273: 1 the mean HRs for K and M stars and for earlier types.  In calculating the 

274: mean HRs for the earlier-type stars, we have omitted the

275: handful of A stars that are associated with X-ray sources,

276: since it is likely that the X-rays from such systems

277: originate from later-type companions (e.g., Daniel et al.\

278: 2002).

279: 

280: It is clear from Fig.\ 1 and Table 1 that all three nearby, young

281: stellar groups considered here display very similar X-ray

282: spectral properties in the RASS data. There appears to be a

283: weak tendency, moreover, for the earlier-type (F and G) stars in these young

284: associations to exhibit harder X-ray emission, as measured

285: by HR1, than the later-type (K and M) stars. 

286: 

287: \subsection{Comparison with T Tauri Stars, the Hyades, and Field Main

288: Sequence Stars}

289: 

290: In Fig.\ 2 we compare the HRs of the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG

291: members with the HRs of classical T Tauri stars (cTTS) and

292: weak-lined T Tauri stars 

293: (hereafter wTTS) in Taurus (Neuhauser et al.\ 1995), with

294: Hyades members detected in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (Stern,

295: Schmitt, \& Kahabka 1995) for which data are available in

296: the BSC, and with nearby field main sequence stars. The last

297: sample consists of the K and M dwarfs studied by Fleming et

298: al.\ (1995; $D < 7$ pc, ages $\stackrel{>}{\sim}$ 1 Gyr) and

299: all single F and G stars  

300: within 14 pc\footnote{As determined through a search of the Nstars

301: database, http://nstars.arc.nasa.gov/index.cfm.} for

302: which data 

303: are available in the BSC. Aside from 

304: $\pi^1$ UMa, which likely is a member of the Ursa Major

305: moving group (age $300$ Myr; e.g., Messina \& Guinan

306: 2002), the stars 

307: in the nearby F-G sample likely have ages of at least 2 Gyr

308: (e.g., Habing et al.\ 2001).

309: In Table 1 and Fig.\ 3 we display the mean HRs for the Taurus TTS,

310: local association, Hyades, and field star samples; in calculating these

311: means and their formal errors, we use as weights the inverse squared

312: uncertainties in HR1 and HR2. 

313: 

314: It is readily apparent from Figs.\ 2 and 3 that the typical HRs for

315: the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG, which cluster in the vicinity of HR1

316: $=0$, HR2 $=0$, differ significantly from the HRs of cTTS

317: and wTTS associated with the Taurus star-forming

318: clouds and from the field dwarf population. 

319: The cloud TTS have larger values of both HR1 and

320: HR2 than the TWA, T-HA, and pBMG stars. The wTTS in Taurus

321: display HR1 in the range $0.8-1.0$, while cTTS in Taurus all

322: display HR1 $=1.0$. The hardness ratios of field dwarfs, on

323: the other hand, are centered well to

324: the left of and somewhat below the hardness ratios of the

325: nearby associations; all of these stars have negative values

326: of HR1, and the vast majority have negative values of

327: HR2. Thus, although there is some overlap between the 

328: three populations (Fig.\ 2) --- cloud TTS, nearby young association,

329: and field main sequence --- Figs.\ 2 and 3 indicate that they

330: represent a sequence of decreasing HR. 

331: 

332: The distinction between the HR distributions of the members of

333: nearby young associations and the Hyades is more subtle

334: (Figs.\ 2, 3). There is substantial

335: overlap between the HR distributions of these two samples

336: (Fig.\ 2). The 93 Hyades members in the RASS are all confined to HR1 $<

337: 0.2$, however, whereas 7 of 53 (13\%) of known members of nearby young

338: associations display HR1 $> 0.2$. Consistent with this

339: observation, the means of both HR1 and HR2 for the Hyades

340: stars are significantly smaller than the means of the

341: members of nearby young associations (Fig.\ 3, left panel). It is

342: apparent, however, that these distinctions are primarily the

343: result of the sharp distinction between the mean HRs of the

344: F and G stars in the young association and Hyades samples

345: (Fig.\ 3, right panel). For K and M stars, there is no

346: statistical difference between the HRs of members of nearby,

347: young associations and those of the Hyades members (Fig.\ 3,

348: center panel).

349: 

350: There is also a significant difference between the mean HR1

351: values of the Hyades and main sequence field populations,

352: for both F,G and K,M stars. However, the weighted mean of HR1 for the

353: field star F,G sample is strongly influenced by the nearest

354: G star, $\alpha$ Cen, because the uncertainties in its HR values

355: ($\pm0.01$) are much smaller than those of the remainder of

356: the field F and G star sample (which range from $\sim\pm0.05$

357: to $\sim\pm0.2$). Excluding this star, whose values of HR1

358: $=-0.98$, HR2 $=-0.38$ place it at the

359: extreme left of the field star HR distribution, the the F,G star HR

360: distributions of the Hyades and the field stars appear

361: quite similar (Fig.\ 2).

362: 

363: \section{Discussion}

364: 

365: \subsection{Does X-ray emission soften with stellar age?}

366: 

367: Figs.\ 2 and 3 suggest

368: that X-ray emission softens monotonically (toward smaller values of

369: HR1 and, to a lesser extent, HR2) as stars evolve

370: from cloud T associations to sparse,

371: cloud-less T associations (as represented by the TWA, T-HA,

372: and bPMG stars), then again from cloud-less T association

373: to aging cluster (Hyades) and, finally, from cluster to the field. 

374: Such a trend of softening

375: X-ray radiation with stellar age has been noted by

376: previous investigators, based on observations of TTS and

377: open clusters (including the Hyades; e.g., 

378: Neuhauser 1997). This trend is much more clearly

379: demonstrated herein --- through the inclusion of the newly

380: identified local associations --- than in the previous work. 

381: We now consider the possible origin and interpretations of

382: such a trend.

383: 

384: \subsubsection{Distance, absorption, and hardness ratio}

385: 

386: The Hyades ($D \sim 45$ pc; e.g., Gunn et al.\ 1988) and the

387: local associations lie at very similar distances, such that

388: any systematic differences in ROSAT HRs most likely are not

389: due to differences in intervening interstellar

390: absorption. We must

391: consider, however, whether the trend evident in Figs.\ 2 and 3 partly  

392: represents monotonically decreasing interstellar absorption,

393: from the most distant sample (cloud 

394: TTS) to the least distant sample (nearby, field main

395: sequence stars). One does expect

396: objects of a given X-ray emission temperature ($T_x$) to

397: move almost directly to the right (increasing HR1) in the

398: hardness ratio diagram as absorbing column ($N_H$)

399: increases (see Fig.\ 4 of Neuhauser et al.\ 1995). However,

400: for $T_x \sim 25$ MK, HR1 only

401: increases from $\sim0.2$ to $\sim0.5$ as $N_H$ increases by

402: 2 orders of magnitude (from $10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$ to $10^{20}$

403: cm$^{-2}$), while HR2 remains roughly constant (Neuhauser et al.). 

404: Thus, while the typical extinction (and hence $N_H$) toward

405: stars in local associations remains to be

406: determined\footnote{Rucinsky \& Krautter (1983) noted that 

407: foreground extinction is negligible in the general

408: direction of TW Hya itself.}, it

409: is likely that the local ISM gas column densities are

410: not large enough to explain the differences in

411: mean HR1 between local, older (age $\stackrel{>}{\sim} 2$

412: Gyr) field stars and the younger stars in the Hyades 

413: and in local groups such as the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG. 

414: Furthermore, we find no statistical difference

415: between the HRs of TWA members recently identified

416: by Zc and those of the ``original'' TWA members identified

417: by Kastner et al.\ (1997) and Webb et al.\ (1999), despite

418: the fact that the former stars are generally more distant than the

419: latter (Zc). The trend apparent in Figure 2 therefore is

420: caused predominantly by age and/or circumstellar environment (\S 5).

421: 

422: The situation may be somewhat more complicated for samples

423: that lie as distant as Taurus ($D \approx 140$ pc), as at such distances

424: interstellar gas may have a significant affect on HR1.

425: Indeed, the effects of interstellar absorption may explain

426: the positions of Pleiades stars in a plot of 

427: HR1 vs.\ HR2; these $\sim100$ Myr-old stars are clustered

428: near HR1 $\sim0.5$ (see Fig.\ 6 of Neuhauser 1997), i.e.,

429: their ROSAT X-ray spectra are softer than those of cloud TTS

430: but are somewhat harder, on average,

431: than those of the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG members, particularly in

432: HR1. The typical reddening toward

433: Pleiades members, $E(B-V) \approx 0.04$ (Breger

434: 1986), implies typical column densities $N_H \approx

435: 2\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Neuhauser et al.\ 1995), so this

436: difference in mean HR1 can be explained as partly due to

437: extinction, suggesting that the intrinsic HRs of the Pleiades stars

438: are similar to those of the

439: younger TWA and other local groups.  

440: 

441: \subsubsection{Spectral type and hardness ratio}

442: 

443: Fig.\ 3 and Table 1 indicate that earlier-type (F and G)

444: stars evolve more rapidly in HR than do late-type (K and M)

445: stars. Specifically, it would appear that at the age of the

446: local associations ($\sim10-30$ Myr), F and G stars display

447: somewhat harder X-ray emission than do K and M stars, while

448: by Hyades age (700 Myr) the situation is reversed.  A recent

449: {\it Chandra} study of the Pleiades (Daniel et al.\

450: 2002) suggests that F and G

451: types already display softer X-ray spectra than K and M

452: types by the time such stars are $\sim$100 Myr old. The

453: relatively rapid X-ray evolution of F and G stars (relative

454: to K and M types) is consistent with the result that K and M

455: stars reach the X-ray ``saturation'' level ($\log{L_x/L{\rm

456: bol}} \sim -3$) at $\sim 100$ Myr (Kastner et al.\ 1997), 

457: much later than F and G stars (e.g., Randich et

458: al.\ 1995). While Fig.\ 3 indicates that K and M

459: stars evolve very little in X-ray spectral hardness between

460: $\sim10$ Myr and 700 Myr, K and M stars do become softer

461: X-ray sources after several Gyr.

462: 

463: \subsection{ROSAT hardness ratios of candidate TWA members}

464: 

465: Based on an optical spectral survey of TWA candidate stars

466: identified by Makarov \& Fabricius (2001; hereafter MF),

467: Song et al.\ (2002; hereafter SBZ) conclude that 20 of these

468: 23 candidates are not TWA members. Many or most of the MF

469: stars appear to be $\sim100$ Myr old, based on their

470: positions in theoretical pre-main sequence isochrones (Fig.\

471: 2 of SBZ) and, to a lesser extent, on the strengths of their

472: Li $\lambda6708$ absorption lines (Fig.\ 1 of SBZ).  Fig.\ 4

473: demonstrates that the HRs of most of the MF stars follow the

474: HR distribution of the ``established'' TWA as defined by

475: Zc. If the results of SBZ are correct, therefore, Fig.\ 4

476: further indicates that there is little evolution in the X-ray

477: spectral properties of late-type stars between

478: $\sim10$ Myr and $\sim100$ Myr. 

479: 

480: The only three Makarov \& Fabricius (2001) TWA candidates

481: whose spectral properties are consistent with TWA

482: membership, according 

483: to SBZ, display somewhat anomalous (TW Hya-like) HRs in

484: Fig.\ 4. The absence of strong H$\alpha$ emission in the SBZ

485: spectra of these three stars (TYC 7760--0835--1, TYC 8238--1462--1, and TYC

486: 8234--2856--1) indicates that (unlike TW Hya) these stars are

487: not classical TTS. If these stars are indeed roughly

488: coeval with and have HRs similar to those of the TWA, then

489: their rightward positions, relative to previously

490: established TWA members, in Fig.\ 4 may be due in part to their 

491: relatively early spectral types; all three stars have $B-V$

492: colors that suggest they are earlier than spectral type K. 

493: We may also view these stars through a

494: larger column density of interstellar absorbing material

495: than most other TWA members (\S

496: 4.1). With regard to the latter possibility, we note that SBZ 

497: derive photometric distances of $\sim130$ pc to TYC

498: 7760--0835--1, TYC 8238--1462--1, and TYC 8234--2856--1 ---

499: i.e., these stars are roughly twice as distant as 

500: the ``established'' TWA membership (Zc). 

501: 

502: \section{Conclusions}

503: 

504: Our analysis of the ROSAT PSPC hardness ratios of local associations, and

505: of cloud T Tauri stars and field main sequence stars,

506: indicates that X-ray spectral hardness 

507: decreases monotonically with

508: increasing stellar age (Figs.\ 2 and 3 and Table 1), with the trend

509: stronger for F and G stars than for K and M stars.

510: There are three alternative

511: interpretations of this trend: 

512: \begin{enumerate}

513: \item The intrinsic X-ray spectrum of a star of spectral

514: type F or later softens with

515: age (Fleming et al.\ 1995; Neuhauser 1997). Such a trend

516: could be due to decreasing X-ray emission

517: temperature and/or to age-dependent changes in X-ray

518: emitting region abundances that modulate the

519: strengths of the brightest emission lines in the ROSAT

520: band. 

521: \item The column density of X-ray absorbing  

522: material associated with the environments of young stars

523: declines monotonically as these objects evolve. For Taurus

524: TTS, the X-ray absorbing gas and 

525: dust may consist of both circumstellar and molecular cloud

526: material, whereas for the older, nearby stellar groups like

527: the TWA, T-HA, and bPMG, we

528: expect residual circumstellar material to dominate. 

529: This would suggest that PSPC hardness ratios of the members

530: of local associations can

531: be used to examine the evolution of gaseous 

532: circumstellar disks around young stars. 

533: \item Contributions to X-ray emission from star-disk

534: interactions in general, and accretion in particular,

535: decline as stars evolve from the T Tauri phase

536: toward the main sequence. Such contributions may arise in

537: star-disk magnetic field reconnection events (e.g., Shu et

538: al.\ 1997) or in energetic shocks along accretion columns

539: (Kastner et al.\ 2002). In either model, the emitting region

540: temperature would be in excess of $\sim10^6$ K, and

541: therefore should contribute a relatively hard excess X-ray

542: emission component that diminishes with age as the disk disperses.

543: \end{enumerate}

544: 

545: For F and G stars --- which continue to evolve in HR from

546: the T Tauri through post-T Tauri through early main sequence

547: stages --- we cannot distinguish, at present, between these

548: alternative explanations. Given that TW Hya is surrounded by

549: a disk viewed nearly pole-on (e.g., Kastner et al.\ 2002 and

550: references therein), the anomalous position

551: of this K7 star in Fig.\ 1 offers support for the third

552: interpretation (declining star-disk interactions) in the case of 

553: young ($\stackrel{<}{\sim} 10$ Myr), low-mass stars. 

554: The first interpretation (changing intrinsic stellar X-ray emission

555: properties) best explains the

556: continuing X-ray spectral evolution of K and M stars beyond 

557: the age of the Hyades, however. We are

558: analyzing archival PSPC spectra of  

559: individual stars to determine whether further progress can

560: be made from the available ROSAT data (Kastner \& Crigger,

561: in preparation). However, high-resolution Chandra and XMM

562: X-ray spectroscopy of representative objects --- from which

563: precise X-ray emitting region temperatures, densities, and

564: elemental abundances can be determined (e.g., Kastner et

565: al.) --- will no doubt be required to establish the

566: mechanism(s) responsible for the softening of X-ray emission

567: with stellar age.

568: 

569: Regardless of the correct interpretation of the observed

570: trend, Figs.\ 2 and 3 demonstrate that analysis of ROSAT HRs can

571: help discriminate between X-ray-emitting T Tauri stars,

572: post-T Tauri stars, and both young (Hyades- and Pleiades-age)

573: and older (age $\stackrel{>}{\sim} 1 $ Gyr) main sequence stars in the 

574: field. ROSAT HRs evidently are a particularly useful tool for

575: assessing the ages of samples that consist mostly of

576: F and G stars, while for

577: spectral types of K and later, ROSAT HRs can effectively

578: isolate peculiar cases (e.g., TW Hya). The

579: results presented here suggest, therefore, that 

580: candidate members of young associations can be identified

581: partly on the basis of ROSAT PSPC hardness ratios,

582: particularly if other age-related X-ray emission

583: discriminants are applied (such as the ratio of X-ray

584: luminosity to bolometric luminosity; Kastner et al.\ 1997).

585: 

586: \acknowledgements{We acknowledge incisive comments from the

587: referee and Inseok Song that substantially improved this paper.

588: Ms.\ Rich acknowledges support from a summer internship program funded

589: by the Industrial Associates of the Center for Imaging Science at RIT.} 

590: 

591: \newpage

592: 

593: \begin{references}

594: 

595: %\reference{} Briceno, C., ... 1997, ApJ, XXX, YYY

596: 

597: \reference{} Breger, M. 1986, ApJ, 309, 311

598: 

599: \reference{} Daniel, K., Linsky, J.L., \& and Gagne,

600: M. 2002, ApJ, 587, 486

601: 

602: \reference{} de la Reza, R., da Silva, L., Jilinski, E.,

603: Torres, C.A.O., \& Quast, G. 2001, in ``Young Stars Near

604: Earth: Progress and Prospects,'' eds.\ R. Jayawardhana \& T.

605: Greene, ASP Conf. Ser., Vol.\ 244, p.\ 37

606: 

607: \reference{} Feigelson, E.D., \& Montmerle, T. 1999, ARAA,

608: 37, 363

609: 

610: \reference{} Fleming, T.A., Schmitt, J.H.M.M., \& Giampapa,

611: M.A. 1995, ApJ, 450, 401

612: 

613: \reference{} Gunn, J.E., Griffin, R.F., Griffin, R.E.M., \&

614: Zimmerman, R.A. 1988, AJ, 96, 198

615: 

616: \reference{} Habing, H. et al. 2001, A\&A, 365, 545

617: 

618: \reference{} Herbig, G. 1978, in ``Problems of Physics

619: and Evolution of the Universe,'' ed.\ L.V. Mirzoyan

620: (Yerevan: Publ.\ Armenian Academy of Sciences), p.\ 171

621: 

622: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R., \& Greene, T. eds. 2001, ``Young Stars Near

623:   Earth: Progress and Prospects,'' ASP Conf. Ser., Vol.\ 244

624: 

625: \reference{} Jensen, E.L.N. 2001, in ``Young Stars Near

626:   Earth: Progress and Prospects,'' eds.\ R. Jayawardhana \& T.

627:   Greene, ASP Conf. Ser., Vol.\ 244, p.\ 3

628: 

629: \reference{} Jura, M., Malkan, M., White, R., Telesco, C.,

630: Pina, R., \& Fisher, R. S. 1998, ApJ, 505, 897

631: 

632: \reference{} Kastner, J.H., Zuckerman, B., Weintraub, D.A., \&

633: Forveille, T. 1997, Science, 277, 67

634: 

635: \reference{} Kastner, J.H., Huenemoerder, D.P., Schulz, N.S., \&

636: Weintraub, D.A. 1999, ApJ, 525, 837

637: 

638: \reference{} Kastner, J.H., Huenemoerder, D.P., Schulz, N.S.,

639: Canizares, C.R., \& Weintraub, D.A. 2002, ApJ, 567, 434 

640: 

641: \reference{} Makarov V.V., \& Fabricius C. 2001, A\&A, 368,

642: 866 (MF)

643: 

644: \reference{} Messina S., \& Guinan, E.F. 2002, A\&A, 393, 225

645: 

646: \reference{} Neuhauser, R., Sterzik, M.F., Schmitt, J.H.M.M.,

647: Wichmann, R., \& Krautter, J. 1995, A\&A, 297, 391

648: 

649: \reference{} Neuhauser, R. 1997, RMA, 10, 323

650: 

651: \reference{} Randich, S., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Prosser,

652: C. F., \& Stauffer, J. R. 1995, A\&A, 300, 134

653: 

654: \reference{} Rucinski, S. M., \& Krautter, J. 1983, A\&A,

655: 121, 217

656: 

657: \reference{} Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski E., \& Bazzanella,

658: B. 2002, ApJ, 575, L75

659: 

660: \reference{} Shu, F.H., Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E., \& Lee,

661: T. 1997, Science, 277, 1475 

662: 

663: \reference{} Song, I., Bessell, M.S., \& Zuckerman B. 2002, A\&A,

664: 385, 862 (SBZ)

665: 

666: \reference{} Stern, R. A., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., \& Kahabka,

667: Peter T. 1995, ApJ, 448, 683

668: 

669: \reference{} Torres, C. A. O., da Silva, L., Quast, G. R., de la Reza,

670: R., \& Jilinski, E. 2000, AJ, 120, 1410

671: 

672: \reference{} Voges, W., et al. 1999, A\&A, 349, 389

673: 

674: \reference{} Webb, R.A., Zuckerman, B., Platais, I., Patience, J.,

675:  White,  R.J., Schwartz, M.J., and McCarthy, C. 1999,

676:  ApJ, 512, L63 

677: 

678: \reference{} Webb, R.A. 2001, in ``Young Stars Near

679:   Earth: Progress and Prospects,'' eds.\ R. Jayawardhana \&

680:   T. Greene, ASP Conf. Ser., Vol.\ 244, p.\ 10

681: 

682: \reference{} Weintraub, D. A., Saumon, D., Kastner, J. H., \&

683: Forveille, T. 2000, ApJ, 530, 867

684: 

685: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., Song, I., Bessell, M. S., \& Webb, R. A. 2001,

686: ApJ, 562, L87 (Za)

687: 

688: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., Song, I., \& Webb, R.A. 2001b, ApJ,

689: 559, 388 (Zb)

690: 

691: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., Webb, R.A., Schwartz, M., Becklin,

692: E.E. 2001c, ApJ, 549, L233 (Zc)

693: 

694: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., \& Webb, R.A. 2000, ApJ, 535, 959 

695: 

696: \end{references}

697: 

698: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrr}

699: \tablecaption{\sc Mean ROSAT PSPC Hardness Ratios}

700: \tabletypesize{\small} \tablewidth{0pt} 

701: \tablehead{

702: \colhead{Sample\tablenotemark{a}} & 

703: \colhead{No.\tablenotemark{b}} & 

704: \colhead{HR1} & \colhead{HR2} } 

705: \startdata 

706: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\sc All stars} \\

707: Taurus T Tauri     & 64 & $0.833\pm0.033$ & $0.289\pm0.043$ \\

708: TW Hya Association & 16 & $0.040\pm0.070$ & $0.025\pm0.047$ \\

709: $\beta$ Pic Moving Group & 15 & $-0.060\pm0.025$ & $0.054\pm0.016$ \\

710: Tuc-Hor Association & 32 & $-0.008\pm0.025$ & $0.015\pm0.034$ \\ 

711: Hyades             & 93 & $-0.234\pm0.027$ & $-0.048\pm0.028$ \\

712: Nearby field stars & 74 & $-0.710\pm0.045$ & $-0.129\pm0.018$ \\

713: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\sc K,M stars} \\

714: TW Hya Association & 16 & $0.040\pm0.070$ & $0.025\pm0.047$ \\

715: $\beta$ Pic Moving Group & 9 & $-0.081\pm0.021$ & $0.062\pm0.015$ \\

716: Tuc-Hor Association & 15 & $-0.057\pm0.024$ & $-0.054\pm0.043$ \\ 

717: Hyades             & 31 & $-0.104\pm0.027$ & $-0.011\pm0.033$ \\

718: Nearby field stars & 61 & $-0.544\pm0.042$ & $-0.083\pm0.021$ \\

719: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\sc F,G stars} \\

720: $\beta$ Pic Moving Group & 4 & $0.104\pm0.074$ & $0.009\pm0.045$ \\

721: Tuc-Hor Association & 16 & $0.029\pm0.040$ & $0.059\pm0.047$ \\ 

722: Hyades             & 62 & $-0.313\pm0.035$ & $-0.044\pm0.039$ \\

723: Nearby field stars & 13 & $-0.928\pm0.050$ & $-0.375\pm0.011$ \\

724: \enddata

725: \tablenotetext{a}{ See text for definitions and references. }

726: \tablenotetext{b}{ Number of X-ray emitting stars included

727: in calculations of means and errors on the means. }

728: \end{deluxetable}

729: 

730: \newpage

731: 

732: %\subsection*{Figure Captions}

733: 

734: \begin{figure*}[htb]

735: \includegraphics[scale=0.9,angle=0]{fig1.ps}

736: %\plotone{fig1.ps}

737: \caption{ROSAT PSPC hardness ratios for presently established 

738: members of the TW Hya Association (left), the Tucana-Horologium

739: Association (center), and the $\beta$ Pic Moving Group

740: (right). The position of TW Hya is indicated in the left panel. In

741: each panel, K and M stars are indicated as asterisks, F and

742: G stars as diamonds, and A stars as triangles. Typical

743: uncertainties in HRs range 

744: from $\pm0.05$ to $\pm0.2$.}

745: \end{figure*}

746: 

747: \begin{figure*}[htb]

748: %\plotone{fig2.ps}

749: \includegraphics[scale=0.9,angle=0]{fig2.ps}

750: \caption{Top left: HRs for T

751: Tauri stars in Taurus (Neuhauser et al.\ 1995). The points

752: at the extreme right of the plot are predominantly cTTS, all

753: of which display $HR1 = 1.0$. Top right:

754: HRs for established members of all three local 

755: associations (TWA, T-HA, $\beta$ Pic). Bottom left: HRs for

756: Hyades members (Stern et al.\ 1995). Bottom right: HRs

757: for nearby ($D < 7$ pc) field K and M dwarfs (Fleming et

758: al.\ 1995) and for single F and G stars within 14

759: pc. Symbols are as in Fig.\ 1. Typical uncertainties in HRs range

760: from $\pm0.05$ to $\pm0.2$.

761: }

762: \end{figure*}

763: 

764: \begin{figure*}[htb]

765: \includegraphics[scale=0.9,angle=0]{fig3.ps}

766: \caption{Means and errors on the mean

767: for the hardness ratios of Taurus TTS (``TTS''), members of the TWA,

768: the T-HA, and the bPMG, and field stars. The left panel

769: illustrates the mean HRs for all stars, 

770: the center panel for K and M stars, and the right panel for

771: F and G stars.

772: }

773: \end{figure*}

774: 

775: \begin{figure*}[htb]

776: %\plotone{fig4.ps}

777: \includegraphics[scale=1.,angle=0]{fig4.ps}

778: \caption{HRs for known TWA

779: members (asterisks) and for candidate TWA members

780: identified by Makarov \& Fabricius (2001). For the Makarov

781: \& Fabricius stars, crosses indicate K and M stars, diamonds

782: F and G stars, and the triangle is an A star (where we infer

783: these spectral types from $B-V$ colors as listed in Song et

784: al.\ 2002). The only three Makarov \& Fabricius candidate

785: stars that Song et al.\ (2002)  

786: tentatively confirmed as TWA members are the three rightmost

787: F and G stars in the diagram (indicated with plus signs).

788: }

789: \end{figure*}

790: 

791: \end{document}

792: 

793: