1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
2: \markboth{G. Bono}{Radial Variables}
3: \pagestyle{myheadings}
4: \nofiles
5:
6: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
7:
8: \def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
9: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
10: \let\prog=\arg
11:
12: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
13: \marginparwidth 1.25in
14: \marginparsep .125in
15: \marginparpush .25in
16: \reversemarginpar
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \title{Cosmic Distances: Current Odds and Future Perspectives}
20: \author{Giuseppe Bono}
21: \affil{INAF - Rome Astronomical Observatory, Via Frascati 33,
22: 00040 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy; bono@mporzio.astro.it}
23:
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: We discuss recent theoretical and empirical results concerning cosmic
27: distances and discuss the problems affecting the Cepheid and the RR Lyrae
28: distance scales. In particular we outline the key role that first overtone
29: Cepheids can play to improve the accuracy of distance determinations to
30: nearby galaxies. We also address the positive features of the K-band
31: Period-Luminosity-Metallicity ($PLZ_K$) relation of RR Lyrae stars
32: when compared to the $M_V$ vs [Fe/H] relation. Moreover, we
33: discuss the impact that accurate multiband data in external galaxies
34: can have on the evolutionary properties of intermediate and low-mass
35: stars. Finally, we introduce possible avenues of future research in
36: stellar astrophysics.
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: \section{Introduction}
41:
42: Dating back to Baade (1944, 1958) the interplay between investigations
43: on stellar populations and on radial variables as primary distance
44: indicators is a well-established route to improve the knowledge
45: on the stellar content of simple and complex stellar systems.
46: During the last half century paramount observational and theoretical
47: efforts have been devoted to single out the evolutionary and
48: pulsation properties of population I and population II stars.
49: In particular, spectroscopic measurements disclosed that the
50: metallicity was not the leading physical parameter to
51: split Baade's populations. Actually, Galactic RR
52: Lyrae stars present a metallicity distribution that ranges from
53: $[Fe/H]\approx-2.2$ up to solar metallicities (Preston 1964;
54: Lub 1977). At the same time, Classical Cepheids have been discovered
55: in dwarf galaxies such as Phoenix and IC~1613 that are 1 dex
56: more metal-poor ($[Fe/H]\approx-1.9$; $[Fe/H]\approx-1.3$) than the
57: Large and the Small Magellanic Cloud (LMC, $[Fe/H]\approx-0.3$; SMC,
58: $[Fe/H]\approx-0.7$). This is the reason why
59: we subdived the two most popular groups of variables located in the
60: Cepheid instability strip in low and intermediate-mass radial variables.
61:
62: The microlensing experiments (EROS, OGLE, MACHO) provided an unprecedented
63: amount of photometric
64: data. The number of variables for which pulsation parameters
65: (periods, mean magnitude and colors, amplitudes) are available have
66: doubled and in some cases increased by one order of magnitude.
67: In this context, HST also played a crucial role, and indeed the two
68: fundamental projects on stellar distances succeeded in the measurement
69: of Cepheids in several spirals of the Virgo cluster (Freedman et al. 2001;
70: Saha et al. 2001). This unique opportunity allowed a substantial
71: improvement in the calibration of secondary distance indicators,
72: and in the evaluation of the Hubble constant.
73:
74: This is the coarse-grained scenario and no doubts that the perspectives
75: for the near future are quite promising. However, the fine-grained
76: scenario still presents several unsettled problems. In the following we
77: discuss the impact that they might have on cosmic distance determinations
78: and on stellar populations.
79:
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81: \section{Classical Cepheids and intermediate-mass stars}
82:
83: Classical Cepheids are the most popular distance indicators, since they
84: are bright stars and they can be easily identified in the Galaxy, in
85: Local Group (LG) galaxies, and in spiral galaxies of the Virgo
86: and Fornax clusters. Pros and cons
87: of the Cepheid distance scale have been discussed countless in the
88: recent literature (Sandage et al. 1999; Tanvir 1999; Feast 1999;
89: Freedman et al. 2001).
90: Plain physical arguments suggest that individual Cepheid distances
91: can be obtained using the Period-Luminosity-Color (PLC) relation.
92: The use of the PLC relation is hampered by two problems: {\em i)}
93: two accurate mean magnitudes are required; {\em ii)} the use of optical
94: bands does require an accurate knowledge of the reddening. To overcome
95: the first problem the two $H_0$ projects decided to properly sample
96: the V band and then to adopt a constant amplitude ratio to improve
97: the accuracy of the mean I magnitude. This empirical trick is
98: supported by theoretical predictions. Two different routes can be
99: followed to overcome the latter problem: {\em i)} near-infrared
100: (NIR) magnitudes are marginally affected by reddening. However,
101: we still lack accurate mean J and K magnitudes for Cepheids in
102: external galaxies. Ground-based NIR observations with 8m class
103: telescopes and/or H-band NICMOS observations will become available
104: in the near future, but certainly NGST will play a major role to
105: improve both the accuracy and the sample size.
106: {\em ii)} the Wesenheit magnitudes (W=V-2.45(V-I)) are reddening
107: free. This approach mimics the use of a PLC relation in the V, V-I
108: band, but the color coefficient attain slightly different values.
109: The strengths and weaknesses mentioned before are the main reasons why
110: Cepheid distances are estimated using the Period-Luminosity
111: (PL) relation. The main problem in using the PL relation is its intrinsic
112: width in effective temperature. This thorny problem is severe in the
113: optical but negligible in the NIR bands (Madore et al. 1987).
114:
115: On top of these problem there is the long-standing debate concerning
116: the universality of both PL and PLC relations, i.e. the fact that the
117: zero-point and the slopes of these relations might depend on the metal
118: content. During the last few years this crucial point has been
119: addressed in several theoretical and empirical investigations
120: (Sasselov et al. 1997; Kennicutt et al. 1998; Macri et al. 2001). These
121: investigations do not agree on the magnitude of the effect, but they
122: agree on the sign. In particular, they found that metal-rich Cepheids,
123: at fixed period, are {\em brighter} than metal-poor ones.
124: Theoretical models constructed by adopting different physical
125: assumptions concerning the coupling between radial
126: displacements and convection (Chiosi, Wood, \& Capitanio 1993;
127: Bono et al. 1999a,b; Alibert et al. 1999) also do agree on the sign
128: among themselves but do not agree on the magnitude of the metallicity
129: dependence. What is really {\em puzzling} is that both linear and
130: nonlinear Cepheid models are at odds concerning the sign, since
131: they predict that metal-rich Cepheids, at fixed period, are
132: {\em fainter} than metal-poor ones.
133: Two pieces of evidence somehow support theoretical predictions:
134: {\em i)} theory and observations suggest that metal-rich Cepheids
135: are redder than metal-poor ones; {\em ii)} recent detailed analysis
136: of V, I, K-band data of a sizable sample of MC Cepheids
137: support the theoretical sign (Groenewegen \& Oudmaijer 2000;
138: Groenewegen 2000; Storm et al. 2000). This problem requires a firm
139: solution, since it affects the calibration of both zero-point and
140: slope. The approach adopted by Pietrzynski et al. (2002) to measure
141: Cepheids on a substantial portion of NGC~300 is quite promising to
142: settle this problem.
143:
144: \begin{figure}
145: \plotfiddle{fig1.ps}{0.5truecm}{0.}{57.}{46.}{-180.}{-290.}
146: \vspace*{7.33truecm}\\
147: %\plotone{fig1.ps}
148: \caption{
149: \footnotesize
150: Comparison between the period distribution of Cepheids in M31
151: with Galactic (top) and Magellanic (middle and bottom) Cepheids.
152: Solid and dashed lines show the period distribution of fundamental and
153: first overtone respectively. The period distribution of Galactic Cepheids
154: accounts for both F and FO Cepheids. It is not clear whether the current
155: sample of M31 Cepheids (Baade \& Swope 1965; Mochejska et al. 2001)
156: includes FOs (dotted line).}
157: \end{figure}
158:
159:
160: However, recent theoretical and empirical results do suggest that
161: the metal content marginally affects the PL and the PLC relation
162: of First Overtone (FO) Cepheids. As a matter of fact, Bono et al.
163: (2002) found that predicted and empirical $PL_K$ relations (K band
164: data from the Two Micron All Sky Survey) and Wesenheit functions
165: (V,I band data from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment)
166: supply mean distances to the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) that agree very
167: well with each other. In particular they estimated a distance for
168: the LMC of $18.53\pm0.08$ (theory) and $18.48\pm0.13$ (obser.),
169: as well as for the SMC of $19.04\pm0.11$ (theory) and $19.01\pm0.13$
170: (obser.). The reasons for the agreement are manifolds:
171: {\em i)} K-band data and Wesenheit function are marginally affected
172: by uncertainties on reddening corrections;
173: {\em ii)} The $PL_K$ relation and the Wesenheit function presents
174: a mild dependence on metal content (Bono et al. 1999b).
175: {\em iii)} The previous intrinsic features do apply to fundamental (F)
176: Cepheids, however, they are magnified for FO Cepheids, since the width
177: in temperature of the latter pulsators is systematically smaller than
178: for the former ones. Therefore, distances based on these variables
179: are less affected by the typical spread of PL relations.
180:
181: The improvement in using FOs to constrain the accuracy of the Cepheid
182: distance scale is undoubtful. The simultaneous
183: detection of both F and FO Cepheids in nearby stellar systems should
184: allow us to estimate on a quantitative basis the systematic errors
185: affecting optical and NIR PL/PLC relations. Unfortunately, current
186: photometric data for FO Cepheids are scanty, and indeed we still lack
187: detailed information for FOs in nearby dwarfs such as Phoenix
188: (Caldwell et al. 1988) but also for spiral galaxies such as M~31.
189: Fig. 1 shows
190: the period distribution of F and FO Cepheids in the Galaxy, M31, and
191: in the MCs. Data plotted in this figure clearly show that the mean
192: metallicity affects the period distribution. In fact, the peak
193: decreases from $\log P=0.7-0.8$ in the Galaxy and in M~31
194: ($Z\approx0.02$) to $\log P=0.2$ in the SMC ($Z\approx0.004$).
195: The same outcome applies to FO periods, and indeed the period
196: distribution peaks around $\log P=0.3$ (LMC) and around
197: $\log P=0.0-0.1$ (SMC). The sample of Galactic FOs is too
198: small to draw any firm conclusion. The main drawback that limits
199: the use of FOs is that they present short periods (see Fig. 1),
200: and, therefore, they are on average 1-2 mag fainter than F variables
201: (see Fig. 2).
202:
203: \begin{figure}
204: \plotfiddle{fig2.ps}{0.5truecm}{0.}{50.}{33.}{-140.}{-210.}
205: \vspace*{6.40truecm}\\
206: %\plotone{fig2.ps}
207: %\vspace*{1.0truecm}\\
208: \caption{
209: \footnotesize
210: Theoretical PL relations in three different photometric
211: bands V (top), I (middle), and K (bottom) constructed by adopting
212: a solar chemical composition and a canonical ML relation (Bono et
213: al. 2002). Solid and dashed lines display the F and FO PL relations.}
214: \end{figure}
215:
216: The detection of a sizable sample of FOs in nearby galaxies is important
217: to improve the accuracy of Cepheid distances as well as
218: to improve our knowledge on He-burning phases and on the occurrence of
219: blue loops. The lower limit in the period distribution of FOs depends
220: on the minimum
221: mass whose blue loop crosses the instability strip. Current evolutionary
222: predictions (Bertelli, Bressan, \& Chiosi 1985; Castellani, Chieffi, \&
223: Straniero 1990; Stothers \& Chin 1993; Bono et al. 2000; Limongi et al.
224: 2000) suggest that the occurrence and the extent in temperature of blue
225: loops strongly depend on the chemical compositions, on the efficiency of
226: the mass loss as well as on the input physics and on the physical
227: assumptions adopted to handle mixing processes in the convective layers.
228:
229: Up to now a detailed comparison between theory and observations has been
230: performed for field stars in the MCs and for a
231: few LMC clusters and in particular for NGC~1866. Although several
232: theoretical and observational (HST) studies have been devoted to this
233: cluster we still lack firm quantitative constraints on the size of the
234: convective core around the Turn-Off region (Testa et al. 1999; Barmina
235: et al. 2002; Walker et al. 2002).
236: This cluster might be crucial to address some problems
237: concerning the Main Sequence fitting and the Cepheid distance
238: scale, since it hosts more than 20 Cepheids (Walker et al. 2001). However,
239: the pulsation parameters are only available for half of them and we still
240: lack homogeneous photometric data for bright and faint cluster stars.
241:
242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
243: \section{RR Lyrae variables and low-mass stars}
244:
245: RR Lyrae stars are very good tracers of the old stellar component, and
246: play a key role in the absolute age determination of Globular Clusters.
247: Although, RR Lyrae stars present several undoubtful advantages, the
248: difference between distance estimates based on different calibrations
249: (Baade-Wesselink method, HB models) of the
250: $M_V$ vs [Fe/H] relation is systematically larger than the empirical
251: uncertainties, and cover a range of $\approx 0.3$ mag on the distance
252: modulus. This indicates that either the reddening accuracy is poor
253: or RR Lyrae distances are still affected by systematic uncertainties.
254: Moreover, recent theoretical (Caputo et al. 2000) and empirical
255: (Layden 2000) studies confirm that the $M_V$ vs [Fe/H] relation
256: is not linear when moving from metal-poor to metal-rich RR Lyrae.
257:
258: Some of the problems affecting the RR Lyrae distance scale can be
259: overcome using the K-band Period-Luminosity ($PL_K$) relation. In a
260: seminal empirical investigation Longmore et al. (1990) demonstrate
261: that RR Lyrae do obey a $PL_K$ relation in this band.
262: This finding was further strengthened by a recent theoretical
263: investigation (Bono et al. 2001) suggesting that RR Lyrae obey to
264: a very tight $PLZ_K$ relation connecting the period, the luminosity,
265: the K-band absolute magnitude, and the metallicity. Current models also
266: disclosed that the $PLZ_K$ relation is, in contrast with the
267: $M_V$ vs [Fe/H] relation, marginally affected by off-ZAHB evolution
268: and by a spread in stellar masses (see Fig. 3).
269: The intrinsic accuracy of previous predictions was tested using the
270: prototype RR Lyr. Recently Benedict et al. (2002) on the basis of
271: new astrometric data collected with FGS~3@HST, provided an accurate
272: estimate of the absolute trigonometric parallax of RR Lyr. The
273: uncertainty of the new parallax ($\pi_{abs}=3.82\pm0.20$ mas)
274: is $\approx 3$ times smaller than the uncertainty on
275: the Hipparcos parallax ($\pi_{abs}=4.38\pm0.59$ mas).
276: Interestingly, Bono et al. (2002) using the predicted
277: $PLZ_K$ relation found a pulsation parallax $\pi_{puls}=3.858+/-0.131$ mas
278: which agrees quite well with the HST parallax and presents a smaller
279: formal error.
280:
281: \begin{figure}
282: \plotfiddle{fig3.ps}{0.5truecm}{0.}{50.}{27.}{-150.}{-160.}
283: \vspace*{4.33truecm}\\
284: %\plotone{fig3.ps}
285: \caption{
286: \footnotesize
287: Projection onto a bidimensional plane of the predicted $PLZ_K$
288: relation for F and FO pulsators. $M_K$
289: magnitudes were scaled to the same metallicity
290: ($\log Z=-3$), and stellar luminosity ($\log L/L_\odot=1.61$). FO periods
291: were fundamentalized ($\log P_F = \log P_{FO} + 0.127$). Pulsation models
292: cover a wide range in metallicity ($0.0001 \le Z \le 0.02$), stellar mass
293: ($0.53 \le M/M_\odot \le 0.75$), and luminosity.}
294: \end{figure}
295:
296: It is noteworthy that HB stars are the crossroad of several astrophysical
297: problems such as the second-parameter problem, the UV-upturn in ellipticals
298: (Ferguson, this volume), as well as the dependence of $M_V(RR)$ on
299: metallicity. Detailed extragalactic
300: samples of HB and RR Lyrae stars are only available for MCs and a few
301: LG dwarfs (Mateo 1998; Bersier \& Wood 2002). New homogeneous data
302: of HB stars in stellar systems with different chemical and dynamical
303: histories might play a crucial role to constrain their evolution properties.
304:
305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
306: \section{Final remarks}
307:
308:
309: Some problems affecting the evolutionary and pulsation properties of
310: classical Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars can be settled during the next
311: ten years using the unprecedented sensitivity and spatial resolution
312: of the CCD camera that are available (ACS) or will become available
313: (WFPC3) on board of HST. Sizable samples of FO Cepheids might be
314: detected and measured across the disk of M~31. The number of orbits
315: necessary to accomplish this experiment is rather modest, since this
316: galaxy hosts regions rich of Cepheids and also because the
317: apparent magnitudes around the minimum luminosity, assuming a distance
318: modulus of 24.5 and a mean reddening of E(B-V)=0.08, roughly range from
319: $V\approx22$ ($\log P =0.6$) to $V\approx24$ ($\log P =-0.1$).
320: The same conclusions apply to RR Lyrae stars, and indeed their apparent
321: magnitudes range from $V\approx25$ to $V\approx26$ (Clementini et al.
322: 2001). Note that up to now we still lack complete sample of HB and
323: RR Lyrae stars in elliptical galaxies such as M~32.
324:
325: A substantial improvement concerning the intrinsic accuracy of the
326: Cepheid distance scale will also be provided by NGST. The superior
327: sensitivity in the NIR bands will allow us to
328: provide accurate measurements of Cepheids mean K magnitudes up to
329: the Virgo and the Fornax cluster. The new data will supply robust
330: distance determinations based on both the $PL_K$ and the $PLC (V,V-K)$
331: relations. At the same time, NGST will supply the unprecedent opportunity
332: to estimate the distance of several galaxies up to the outskirts of the
333: LG using simultaneously NIR relations for RR Lyrae ($PLZ_K$) and
334: Classical Cepheids.
335: Future astrometric missions such as the SIM, and GAIA may
336: also supply accurate empirical constraints concerning the accuracy of
337: absolute (zero-point) and relative (slope) distance estimates
338: as well as on their dependence on metallicity.
339: %Fundamental data to investigate the dependence of Cepheid and RR Lyrae
340: %pulsation properties in low density regions such as the outer disk or
341: %the external halo in LG galaxies will be provided by ground-based
342: %telescopes of the 8m class equipped with wide field imagers (LBT, Gemini).
343:
344:
345: The previous improvements would supply tight constraints on the systematic
346: uncertainties affecting primary distance indicators, and hopefully a
347: determination of the Hubble constant with a global accuracy of the order
348: of 5-7\%. The next step that can allow us to nail down the systematic
349: uncertainty affecting the evaluation of $H_0$ is to only use Cepheids
350: and to by pass secondary distance indicators. Data available in the
351: literature clearly show that distance determinations to the Coma cluster
352: based on different zero-points and secondary indicators range from
353: $34.64\pm0.25$ (SBF in the K-band, Jensen et al. 1999) to $35.29\pm0.11$
354: (various methods, Tammann et al. 1999), while the $H_0$ values range
355: from $85\pm10$ to $60\pm6$ $km\,s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}$.
356:
357: The main advantage in using Classical Cepheids is that we know the physical
358: mechanisms that drive the pulsation instability in these objects. On the
359: other hand, the experiment is challenging from an observational point of
360: view, since it is necessary to detect and measure Cepheids
361: in giant spirals of the Coma cluster. This means that we should be able to
362: perform accurate photometry down to $V\approx31-32$ mag with a spatial
363: resolution that is at least a factor of five better than current HST
364: capabilities. We also note that this limit magnitude would supply
365: the unique opportunity to estimate the age of old stellar component in
366: LG galaxies up to the outer fringes (NGC~3109, Antlia), and in turn
367: to supply a robust lower limit to the age of the Universe. Even though
368: we expect that these two parameters are tightly correlated we could
369: agree with Baade's statement: {\em Although I am quite certain that
370: I do not mistake pink elephants for pink mice an unprejudiced check
371: is always reassuring} (as quoted by Feast 2000).
372:
373: It is a pleasure to thank N. Panagia for a detailed reading of a
374: draft of this paper. I am indebted to my collaborators for helpful
375: discussions and suggestions.
376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
377: \begin{references}
378:
379: %\reference
380: \reference Alibert, Y., Baraffe, I., Hauschildt, P., \& Allard, F. 1999,
381: A\&A, 344, 551
382: \reference Baade, W. 1944, ApJ, 100, 79
383: \reference Baade, W. 1958, in Stellar Populations, ed. D.J.K. O'Connell
384: (Amsterdam: North Holland), 3
385: \reference Baade, W. \& Swope, H. H. 1965, AJ, 70, 212
386: \reference Barmina, R., Girardi, L., \& Chiosi, C. 2002, A\&A, 385, 847
387: \reference Benedict, G. F., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 473
388: \reference Bersier, D., \& Wood, P. R. 2002, AJ, 123, 840
389: \reference Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., \& Chiosi, C. 1985, A\&A, 150, 33
390: \reference Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., \& Marconi, M. 1999b, ApJ,
391: 512, 711
392: \reference Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \&
393: Storm, J. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1183
394: \reference Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \&
395: Storm, J. 2002, MNRAS, 332, L78
396: \reference Bono, G., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., 2002, ApJ, 565, L83
397: \reference Bono, G., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Marconi, M., Caputo, F. 2002,
398: ApJ, 574, L33
399: \reference Bono, G., et al. 2000, ApJ, 543, 955
400: \reference Bono, G., Marconi, M., \& Stellingwerf, R. F. 1999a, ApJS, 122, 167
401: \reference Caldwell, N., \& Schommer, R. 1988, in The extragalactic distance
402: scale, (San Francisco: ASP), 77
403: \reference Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \& Ripepi, V. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 819
404: \reference Castellani, V., Chieffi, A., \& Straniero, O. 1990, ApJS, 74, 463
405: \reference Chiosi, C., Wood, P. R., \& Capitanio, N. 1993, ApJS, 86, 541
406: \reference Clementini, G., Federici, L., Corsi, C., Cacciari, C.,
407: Bellazzini, M., \& Smith, H. A. 2001, 2001, ApJ, 559, L109
408: \reference Feast, M. 1999, PASP, 111, 775
409: \reference Feast, M. 2000, JHA, 31, 29
410: \reference Freedman, W. L., HST Key Project 2001, ApJ, 553, 47
411: \reference Groenewegen, M. A. T. 2000, A\&A, 363, 901
412: \reference Groenewegen, M. A. T., \& Oudmaijer, R. D. 2000, A\&A, 356, 849
413: \reference Jensen, J. B., Tonry, J. L., \& Luppino, G. A. 1999, ApJ, 510, 71
414: \reference Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., HST Key Project 1998, ApJ, 498, 181
415: \reference Layden, A. 2002, in IAU Colloq. 185, Radial and Nonradial Pulsations
416: as Probes of Stellar Physics, ed. C. Aerts, T. R. Bedding \& J.
417: Christensen-Dalsgaard (San Francisco: ASP), 118
418: \reference Limongi, M., Straniero, O., \& Chieffi, A. 2000, ApJS, 129, 625
419: \reference Longmore, A. J., Dixon, R., Skillen, I., Jameson, R. F.,
420: Fernley, J. A., 1990, MNRAS, 247, 684
421: \reference Lub, J. 1977, A\&AS, 29, 345
422: \reference Macri, L. M. et al. 2001, ApJ, 559, 243
423: \reference Madore, B. F., Welch, D. L., McAlary, C. W., \& McLaren, R. A.
424: 1987, ApJ, 320, 26
425: \reference Mateo, M. 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 435
426: \reference Mochejska et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2477
427: \reference Pietrzynski, G., Gieren, W., Fouqu\'e, P., \& Pont, F. 2002,
428: AJ, 123, 789
429: \reference Preston, G. W. 1964, ARA\&A, 2, 23
430: \reference Saha, A., Sandage, A., Tammann, G. A., Dolphin, A. E.,
431: Christensen, J., Panagia, N., Macchetto, F. D. 2001, ApJ, 562, 314
432: \reference Sandage, A., Bell, R. A., \& Tripicco, M. J. 1999, ApJ, 522, 250
433: \reference Sasselov, D. D., et al. 1997, A\&A, 324, 471
434: \reference Storm, J., Carney, B. W., Gieren, W. P., Fouqu\'e, P., \&
435: Fry, A. M. 2000, in IAU Coll. 176, The Impact of Large-Scale Surveys on
436: Pulsating Star Research, eds. L. Szabados \& D. Kurtz (San Francisco: ASP), 145
437: \reference Stothers, R. B., \& Chin, C. W. 1993, ApJ, 412, 294
438: \reference Tammann, G. A., Sandage, A., Reindl, B. 1999, in 19th Texas
439: Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology, astro-ph/9904360
440: \reference Tanvir, N. R. 1999, in Post-Hipparcos Cosmic Candles, eds.
441: A. Heck \& F. Caputo (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 17
442: \reference Testa, V. et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 2839
443: \reference Walker, A. R., et al. 2002, to be submitted
444: \reference Walker, A. R., Raimondo, G., Di Carlo, E., Brocato, E.,
445: Castellani, V., \& Hill, V. 2001, ApJ, 560, L139
446: \end{references}
447:
448:
449: \end{document}
450: