1: %\documentstyle[aaspptwo]{article}
2: \documentstyle[11pt, aasms4]{article}
3: \input epsf
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{Detection of small scale fluctuations in the near-IR cosmic infrared
6: background from long exposure 2MASS fields}
7:
8: \author{A. Kashlinsky$^1$, S. Odenwald$^2$, J. Mather$^3$, M. F. Skrutskie$^4$ \&
9: R. M. Cutri$^5$
10: \footnote{\scriptsize{
11: $^1$SSAI, Code 685, Goddard Space Flight Center,
12: Greenbelt, MD 20771\\
13: $^2$Raytheon ITSS, Code 630, Goddard Space
14: Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771\\
15: $^3$Code 685, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771\\
16: $^4$Dept of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903\\
17: $^5$Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, Pasadena, California
18: }}
19: }
20: %\date{}
21: %\oddsidemargin .3in
22: %\evensidemargin .1in
23: %\footheight 12pt \footskip 30pt
24: %\topmargin 0.cm
25: %\textheight 21.5cm
26: %\textwidth 16.cm
27: %\renewcommand \baselinestretch{1.5}
28:
29: % list of standard definitions of symbols, figure commands
30:
31: \def\plotone#1{\centering \leavevmode
32: \epsfxsize=\columnwidth \epsfbox{#1}}
33:
34: \def\wisk#1{\ifmmode{#1}\else{$#1$}\fi}
35:
36:
37: \def\wm2sr {Wm$^{-2}$sr$^{-1}$ } %new definition
38: \def\nw2m4sr2 {nW$^2$m$^{-4}$sr$^{-2}$\ } % new definition
39: \def\nwm2sr {nWm$^{-2}$sr$^{-1}$\ } % new definition
40: \def\nw2m4sr {nW$^2$m$^{-4}$sr$^{-1}$\ }
41: \def\Ncut {$N_{\rm cut}$\ }
42: \def\lt {\wisk{<}}
43: \def\gt {\wisk{>}}
44: \def\le {\wisk{_<\atop^=}}
45: \def\ge {\wisk{_>\atop^=}}
46: \def\lsim {\wisk{_<\atop^{\sim}}}
47: \def\gsim {\wisk{_>\atop^{\sim}}}
48: \def\kms {\wisk{{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}}}
49: \def\Lsun {\wisk{{\rm L_\odot}}}
50: \def\Msun {\wisk{{\rm M_\odot}}}
51: %\def\um {\wisk{\mu {\rm m}\}}
52: \def\um { $\mu$m\ }
53: \def\sig {\wisk{\sigma}}
54: \def\etal {{\sl et~al.\ }}
55: \def\eg {{\it e.g.\ }}
56: \def\ie {{\it i.e.\ }}
57: \def\bsl {\wisk{\backslash}}
58: \def\by {\wisk{\times}}
59: \def\cosec {\wisk{\rm cosec}}
60: \def\mic {\wisk{ \mu{\rm m }}}
61:
62:
63: \def\amin {\wisk{^\prime\ }}
64: \def\asec {\wisk{^{\prime\prime}\ }}
65: \def\cc {\wisk{{\rm cm^{-3}\ }}}
66: \def\deg {\wisk{^\circ}}
67: \def\ddeg {\wisk{{\rlap.}^\circ}}
68: \def\damin {\wisk{{\rlap.}^\prime}}
69: \def\dasec {\wisk{{\rlap.}^{\prime\prime}}}
70: \def\approxeq{$\sim \over =$}
71: \def\abouteq{$\sim \over -$}
72: \def\percm{cm$^{-1}$}
73: \def\percmsq{cm$^{-2}$}
74: \def\percmcub{cm$^{-3}$}
75: \def\perhz{Hz$^{-1}$}
76: \def\perpc{$\rm pc^{-1}$}
77: \def\persec{s$^{-1}$}
78: \def\peryr{yr$^{-1}$}
79: \def\te{$\rm T_e$}
80: \def\tenup#1{10$^{#1}$}
81: \def\to{\wisk{\rightarrow}}
82: \def\thin{\thinspace}
83: \def\uk{$\rm \mu K$}
84: %
85: \def\p{\vskip 13pt}
86:
87:
88: %\maketitle
89:
90: \begin{abstract}
91:
92: We report first results for the cosmic infrared background (CIB)
93: fluctuations at 1.25, 1.65 and 2.17 $\mu$m obtained from long exposures constructed from 2MASS standard star fields. We have co-added and
94: analyzed scans from one such field with a total exposure time $>$ 1 hour, and removed
95: sources and other artifacts. The stars and galaxies were
96: clipped out to K$_s\simeq$19$^m$ leaving only high-$z$ galaxies (or
97: possibly local low-surface-brightness systems). The residual component
98: of the diffuse emission on scales from a few arc-sec to a
99: few arc-min has a power-law slope consistent with emission produced by clustered galaxies. The noise (and residual artifacts) contribution to the signal is small and the colors of the signal are very different from Galactic stars or air-glow. We therefore identify the signal as CIB fluctuations from the faint unresolved
100: galaxies. We show that the present-day galaxies with no evolution would
101: produce a significant deficit in the observed CIB fluctuations. Thus the
102: dominant contribution to the observed signal must come from high $z$ and
103: may indicate high rates of star formation at those epochs.
104: \end{abstract}
105:
106: \keywords{Cosmology: observations - cosmology: diffuse radiation - cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe - galaxies: evolution}
107: \newpage
108:
109: \centerline{\bf 1. Introduction}
110: The near-IR cosmic infrared background (CIB) ($\lambda \lsim 3\mu$m)
111: arises mainly from the stellar component of galaxies and probes galactic star formation and evolution at early times.
112: The recent surprising, and
113: mutually consistent, discoveries of the near-IR CIB from
114: the COBE/DIRBE and Japan's IRTS datasets (see Hauser \& Dwek 2001 for review)
115: indicated the large amplitude of both
116: the CIB fluctuations (Kashlinsky \& Odenwald 2000a - hereafter KO, Matsumoto et
117: al 2000,2002) and
118: DC levels (Dwek \& Arendt 1998, Gorjian \& Wright 2000, Wright \& Reese 2000,
119: Cambresy et al 2001).
120: It is hard to explain these measurements by the {\it observed} galaxy
121: populations; e.g. at 2.2 \um (K band), the
122: faintest observed galaxies give only 30-40\% of the observed CIB
123: (Kashlinsky \& Odenwald 2000b, Madau \& Pozzetti 2000). If these detections
124: are true, and barring the possible existence of local undetected low surface
125: brightness galaxies, the deficit CIB must come
126: from fainter galaxies at high $z$ and inaccessible to
127: telescopic studies until the launch of NGST.
128:
129: In this {\rm Letter} we report the first detection of small angular scale
130: fluctuations in the near-IR CIB. We used long integration data constructed from 2MASS
131: \footnote{\scriptsize{ This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All
132: Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
133: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
134: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
135: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
136: Foundation.}}
137: observations of one standard star field (SSF) with a total exposure
138: $\gsim$1 hour. The images were co-added to produce a $8.6^\prime \times 1^\circ$ field from which we removed resolved sources (both stars and distant
139: galaxies) and other artifacts as described in Sec.2 and in more
140: detail in
141: the companion paper (Odenwald, Kashlinsky, Mather, Skrutskie \& Cutri 2002 -
142: OKMSC). We then computed
143: the fluctuation spectrum of the residual diffuse emission; its slope in the co-added images is consistent with that of galaxy
144: clustering. We estimated the contributions to the power spectrum from
145: atmospheric fluctuations (AF), remaining Galactic stars (GS) and cirrus
146: emission, zodiacal light (ZL), instrument noise (IN) and extinction. These components have different slopes
147: and negligible amplitudes compared to the detected signal, suggesting
148: that the diffuse component fluctuations in the final image are dominated by the CIB. If this identification is correct, the
149: levels of the CIB from remaining faint (K$_s>$18.5$^m$-19$^m$), and likely high-$z$, galaxies may imply significant star formation at early times.
150:
151: \centerline{\bf 2. Data analysis}
152: 2MASS
153: conducted measurements with a 3-band camera observing the
154: sky simultaneously at J, H and K$_s$ (1.25, 1.65 and 2.17 $\mu$m). The 2MASS Atlas images have 7.8 sec exposure per pixel and are interpolated with 1$^{\prime\prime}$ pixels.
155: Our selected SSF, 90565, centered on the star P565-C has
156: Galactic and Ecliptic coordinates (243$^\circ , 27^\circ$) and ($21^\circ, 35^\circ$) respectively. The data analyzed here consisted of 2080
157: calibrated 8.6$^\prime\times$15$^\prime$ images covering an $8.6^\prime \times 1^\circ$ swath oriented north-south, obtained during observations at CTIO between Apr and Aug 1998. Calibration, co-adding and other details are
158: given in the companion OKMSC paper.
159: The final image had a total
160: exposure $\sim$3,700 secs and the field was divided into
161: seven square patches $512^{\prime\prime}$ on the side.
162:
163: In each patch,
164: individual stars and galaxies were removed by an iterative procedure
165: where each pixel with surface brightness exceeding 3 standard deviations for the patch was excised along with 8 neighboring pixels.
166: We computed the integrated magnitude limits of the removed sources from the surface brightness threshold. The peak surface brightness of unresolved sources was measured to be +2.5$^m$
167: fainter than the corresponding integrated flux reflecting the part of the beam
168: response function within the central 1$^{\prime\prime}$ 2MASS pixel. Because of the variation in background level and associated
169: noise, the patches were clipped to different point source absolute flux
170: levels. In K$_s$ band these vary from
171: 18.5$^m$ to 19$^m$.
172:
173: The clipping left $>$90\% of the pixels in the patches, which
174: provided a good basis for a Fourier analysis of the diffuse light. Each patch
175: was Fourier transformed with pixels weighted by the number of observations. The final results are the same without the weighting.
176: The blanked out pixels were assigned flux fluctuation $\delta F(\vec{\theta})$=0; i.e. no power
177: is added to the diffuse light emission. After the initial FT of the clipped data, we removed the occasional stripe artifacts from
178: diffraction and array row saturation by bright stars. These features produce excess power concentrated along each
179: Fourier space axis. The stripes were handled by
180: removing a narrow strip of pixels (2 pixels sufficed in practice) in
181: the Fourier plane along each axis. The final 3-band color images can be viewed at http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/spacesci/pictures/2mass/2mass.jpg.
182:
183: The clipped de-striped data have a very different
184: distribution than AF. Fig. 1 shows
185: $\sqrt{q^2P(q)/2\pi}$, a
186: typical fluctuation on angular scale $\theta\!\sim \!\pi/q$. The power spectra follow a power law $P(q) \propto q^n$ with $n\!\sim\!
187: -1$, as expected from sources clustered like galaxies.
188: For a single standard exposure (7.8 sec) the diffuse emission of the clipped patches has white noise power spectrum from remaining GS and AF multiplied by the Gaussian beam of $2.5^{\prime\prime}$ FWHM. The variance of the clipped maps decreases $\propto$1/$t$ as expected for AF and the plotted power spectrum of AF in the final images was computed from the 7.8 sec image and rescaled to the total exposure time. AF have a white
189: noise distribution ($ \sqrt{q^2P(q)/2\pi} \!\propto \!q$) and on the beam scale are
190: typically $\sim$20 \nwm2sr . The long
191: exposure {\it non-clipped} patches also have a white noise power spectrum from GS and AF.
192:
193: \centerline{3. \bf Fluctuations from CIB compared to other terms}
194: The non-cosmological contributions to the final $P(q)$ are small and
195: are as follows:
196:
197: $\bullet$ {\bf Instrument noise}: This was estimated from difference maps
198: for time-ordered string of measurements, each 7.8 sec long, in which
199: alternating even and odd images are subtracted.
200: The difference maps show a near white-noise power spectrum and the
201: fluctuation in the difference map patches is $< $10\% of the clipped co-added
202: map. This means that the IN
203: and time-dependent AF are small and in addition have
204: a different power spectrum than the detected signal. To check for stray light effects, we selected from the standard 2MASS product at 7.8 sec exposure per pixel several regions in the Galactic plane with comparable number of stars to our field and processed these with the same clipping algorithm. The clipped power spectra are almost perfectly flat suggesting that stray light does not explain the slopes of our measured
205: fluctuation power spectra.
206:
207: $\bullet$ {\bf Zodiacal light}: Our field is above the
208: asteroidal bands so only very small fluctuations in the ZL
209: are expected (Kelsall et al 1998).
210: Studies of the ZL arcminute-scale structure (Abraham et al 1998) with the ISO/ISOPHOT
211: show that at 25$\mu$m no structure can be detected above 0.2\% of the
212: total ZL brightness.
213: The 2MASS observations span a period from
214: April to August and a solar elongation range from $115^\circ$ to
215: $128^\circ$, so any persistent ZL structure would become
216: uncorrelated during the data averaging process.
217: The DIRBE based ZL model (Kelsall et al 1998) at Solar elongation of
218: 120\deg gives the mean ZL intensity of 136 \nwm2sr in
219: K$_s$ band and 400 \nwm2sr in J band.
220: Based on the limit set by the structure at 25 \um we expect that ZL structure
221: will contribute flux fluctuation $<$0.3 \nwm2sr on
222: arc-minute scales in the 2MASS bands.
223:
224: $\bullet$ {\bf Remaining Galactic stars}: GS brighter than $m_{\rm cut}(K_s)
225: \simeq $18.5-19$^m$ were clipped out. Non-clipped patches show that
226: GS have a white noise spatial distribution, so over the 2MASS beam $\omega_{\rm beam}$ the flux
227: fluctuation, $\sigma_*$, from remaining GS is
228: $\sigma_*^2$=$\omega_{\rm beam}^{-1} \int_{m_{\rm cut}}^\infty F_\nu^2(m) n(m)
229: dm$, where $n(m) dm$ is the number
230: of GS within $dm$ and $F_\nu(m)$=$F_{\nu,0}
231: 10^{-0.4m}$ is the flux density of a star of magnitude $m$. Using the DIRBE based Galaxy Faint Source Model (Arendt et al 1998) normalized to 2MASS we find that GS fainter
232: than $m_{\rm cut}\!\geq $18.5 contribute $\sigma_*\!<$9 \nwm2sr . This component adds in quadrature to the total
233: dispersion, contributing $\lsim $5 \% of the total signal in Fig.
234: 1.
235: Stars are not clipped out completely and we checked by increasing the clipping mask size and using other clipping methods, that residual stellar artifacts do not mimic the observed signal.
236:
237: $\bullet$ {\bf Galactic cirrus}: From
238: COBE/DIRBE data Arendt et al (1998, Table 4) estimate that the
239: cirrus flux at 3.5 \um is $\sim$5\% of that at 100 $\mu$m.
240: KO find the fluctuation in the DIRBE maps with 0.3$^{\rm
241: o}$ pixels in the (mainly) cirrus emission at 100 \um in the direction of P565-C to be $<$10 \nwm2sr (see their Fig.22). Wright (1998) and KO show that the
242: DIRBE data on the Galactic cirrus spatial distribution give a spectral index
243: $n\sim -2$, consistent with the IRAS analysis of Gautier et al (1992), but very
244: different from the slope of the signal we detect in
245: the final co-adds. Combining these results and assuming the 3.5 \um flux to
246: represent an upper limit on the emission at shorter 2MASS wavelengths
247: gives $\sigma_{\rm cirrus}$ well below 1 \nwm2sr .
248:
249: $\bullet$ {\bf Galactic extinction}:
250: The amount of extinction varies strongly
251: with wavelength: the strongest fluctuations caused by a clumpy interstellar
252: medium would
253: occur in J-band, and with declining strength in H and K$_s$ bands. No such
254: wavelength-dependent variation in the power spectra in Fig. 1 is apparent.
255: Furthermore, at K$_s$ band, the DIRBE based
256: models for the amount of interstellar extinction in the near-IR indicate $A
257: \simeq 0.05^m$ (Arendt et al 1998) and a
258: differential extinction across our $1^\circ$ field of $\approx 0.005^m$. This
259: corresponds to an intensity gradient of 0.5\% at the $1^\circ$-scale or less
260: than about 0.3 \nwm2sr contribution to the total dispersion.
261:
262: $\bullet$ {\bf Atmospheric fluctuations}:
263: Stationary AF (or gradients) should correlate with the air
264: column density along the line-of-sight. If important, these effects would
265: introduce airmass-dependent correlations into the data during the five months of observations. We computed the flux dispersion in the individual
266: scans finding no statistically significant
267: correlation between the airmass and the flux dispersion.
268: AF dominate the diffuse emission for 7.8 sec images and
269: integrate down $\propto t^{-1}$, contributing a small fraction to the overall fluctuations (Fig. 1).
270:
271: $\bullet$ {\bf Color}: in Fig. 2a the colors of the diffuse signal in the
272: final images are compared with those of the 2MASS stars, the
273: present day galaxies and the atmosphere. The various
274: foreground components and the nearby galaxies have different colors from the signal in Fig. 1.
275:
276: This discussion suggests that the CIB is the most likely source of the signal in Fig. 1. The largest angular scales probed here correspond to $<$1$h^{-1}$Mpc where galaxy clustering is non-linear and the slope of the power spectrum is consistent with that from galaxy clustering.
277:
278: \centerline{4. \bf Discussion}
279: Assuming that the fluctuations in Fig. 1 are from the CIB, can
280: they be produced by the observed non-evolving galaxy populations, or do they require high $z$ evolution? The CIB flux from evolving galaxies is given by $\frac{dF}{dz}$=$\frac{c}{4\pi} \frac{dt}{dz} \frac{{\cal L}_\nu(\nu
281: (1+z), z)}{1+z}$, where ${\cal L}_\nu$ is the co-moving
282: luminosity density from galaxies. As in Yoshii \& Takahara (1988) we separate the $z$-dependence in ${\cal L}_\nu(z)$ into terms due to K-correction (${\cal
283: K_\nu}$), pure luminosity
284: evolution (${\cal E_\nu}$) and pure number density evolution (${\cal N_\nu}$),
285: i.e. ${\cal L}_{\nu}(z)$=$10^{-0.4[{\cal K_\nu}(z) + {\cal
286: E_\nu}(z)+{\cal N_\nu}(z)]} {\cal L}_{\nu}(0)$. We use the K-band for
287: quantitative estimates and consider for now only the
288: K-correction effects from the observed galaxies. The K-correction was taken from Fig. 1 of JK99. The luminosity
289: density was normalized at $z$=0
290: using the present-day K-band luminosity function (Gardner et al 1997; Loveday 2000). At small angles, the CIB power spectrum is related to
291: $dF/dz$ and the evolving 3-D power spectrum of galaxy clustering, $P_3(k)$ via (e.g. KO) $P(q)$=$\int_0^\infty
292: \left(\frac{dF}{dz}\right)^2 \frac{1}{c\frac{dt}{dz} d_A^2(z)}
293: P_3(qd_A^{-1}(z); z) dz$,
294: where $d_A(z)$ is the angular diameter distance.
295:
296: Fig. 2b shows that the total CIB from the observed galaxies
297: (K$\lsim$24) is $\simeq$8-10 \nwm2sr (Gardner 1996, Madau \& Pozzetti 2000,
298: Kashlinsky \& Odenwald 2000b), a factor of 2-3 smaller than the CIB levels of $F_{\rm K, total}\sim$25 \nwm2sr
299: (Matsumoto et al 2000,2002, Gorjian \& Wright 2000, Wright \& Reese 2000). The
300: deficit is similarly large at 1.25 \um (Cambresy et al 2001) and 3.5 \um (Dwek
301: \& Arendt 1998) and in the $\sim$degree scale
302: fluctuation analysis of DIRBE data (KO). The vertical lines show the limiting K
303: magnitude, ${\rm K_{cut}}$ of excised galaxies. At $z$=1, the
304: angular scale of $1\dasec$
305: subtends 10-15$h^{-1}$Kpc, depending on cosmological parameters, so distant galaxies should have been excised almost completely by our
306: clipping method. Galaxies up to the clipping threshold contribute only $\sim$5 \nwm2sr to the total CIB. Hence, if the detections of the CIB
307: are true the bulk of the flux must be emitted by much fainter galaxies.
308:
309: Fig. 2c shows the rate of CIB production, $dF/dz$, assuming only
310: non-evolving galaxies that were clipped out to ${\rm K_{cut}}$. The K-correction is
311: from Fig. 1 of JK99 and no-evolution is a fair assumption for the low-$z$ part of the figure (De Propis et al 1999). Because the brighter galaxies are removed, the
312: bulk of the remaining CIB comes from high $z$ probing galaxies at early times. For
313: comparison the median observed redshift of K$\sim 19^m$ galaxies is $z\;\sim$0.7-0.8 (Cowie et al 1996).
314: %\footnote{\scriptsize{
315: We assume
316: that all faint galaxies are described by a Schechter-type luminosity
317: function and hence are located at cosmological redshifts, but a
318: possibility exists that
319: at least some of the very faint galaxies are local low-surface brightness
320: systems that can not be detected with the current techniques. %} }
321: From the K-correction evolution only for $(\Omega, \Omega_\Lambda)$=(0.3,0.7),(1, 0) and (0.3,0) we get that the total flux for 24$>$K$> $19 is 3.7, 2.1 and 2.8 \nwm2sr which compares well with Fig. 2b.
322: Far-IR CIB studies from ISO also suggest strong evolution of high-$z$ galaxy populations (Elbaz et al. 1999, Dole et al 2001).
323: Hence, if the DC measurements of the K-band CIB are correct, the excess flux must come from fainter and evolving galaxies likely at higher $z$.
324:
325: Fig. 2d shows the fluctuation at $1^{\prime\prime}$ vs
326: the magnitude $m_{\rm cut}$ of the clipped galaxies for the 2MASS bands.
327: Because clipping was done before de-striping the value of $\sigma$
328: shown is {\it before} de-striping. The high numbers for $P(q)$ are consistent with other findings (KO,
329: Matsumoto et al 2002) after accounting for the beam difference and the fact that in the large-beam DIRBE and IRTS studies no galaxies were removed. Fig. 1 shows the power
330: spectrum of the diffuse CIB from IRTS (Matsumoto et al 2002) and the open
331: diamond with error bar shows the fluctuation at $\sim 0.5^\circ$ from the
332: COBE DIRBE data (KO). The contribution from galaxies clipped out to K$_s$=18.5$^m$
333: can be estimated from the JK99 modeling and gives $\delta F_{\rm rms} \sim$(2-3), (1-1.5) \nwm2sr in J, K bands. When added to the 2MASS numbers
334: extrapolated to the appropriate angular scale using the slope of Patch 2 this gives the total (J,K) CIB fluctuation at $0.5^\circ$ of $\sim$(10-12, 2.5-3) \nwm2sr consistent with the KO results.
335: The largest angular
336: scales probed by our analysis after de-striping are $\pi/q
337: \sim 1.5^\prime$ which at $z$=1 corresponds to $\simeq$1$h^{-1}$Mpc, where galaxy clustering is
338: non-linear. Hence in Fig. 2d we evaluated the expected CIB fluctuations
339: assuming only K-correction evolution and two extremes of galaxy clustering evolution: clustering stable in
340: proper (thick solid line) and co-moving coordinates.
341: The numbers are for $(\Omega, \Omega_\Lambda)$=(0.3,0.7), but models with $\Omega_\Lambda$=0 would give smaller numbers. The deficit in the amplitude of the CIB fluctuation is of a similar factor as the DC component and likely implies strong galaxy evolution at high $z$.
342:
343:
344: The slope of the detected power spectrum depends on the magnitude cutoff as
345: shown in Fig. 2e. If progressively fainter galaxies are removed the slope
346: of the power spectrum flattens. This is consistent with fainter galaxies being at higher $z$ when the clustering pattern was less evolved. The
347: slope of this dependence is similar in all three bands. The power spectrum of the present-day galaxy clustering on non-linear scales has $n\simeq$--1.3
348: (Groth \& Peebles 1974, Maddox et al 1990), so it would appear that the J
349: band patch with the lowest $m_{\rm cut}$ probes smaller $z$. In
350: CDM models the non-linear
351: power spectrum of galaxy clustering evolves toward
352: steeper slope (higher $|n|$) at low $z$. This is consistent with the trend in Fig. 2d and it appears that H and K bands probe the farthest galaxy populations. This is supported by the colors: the solid
353: line in Fig. 2a shows the evolution due to K-correction alone (with
354: spectra from JK99) and assuming that all CIB fluctuations in all three bands are dominated by galaxies at the same $z$, in which case the colors would become
355: bluer contrary to our observations. A simple way to make the color redder, shown with the filled circle in Fig. 2a, is if different bands, clipped to their respective $m_{\rm cut}$, probe different $z$ with K band probing the earliest times.
356:
357: We thank Rick Arendt for fruitful discussions and
358: comments on the manuscript.
359: %\begin{thebibliography}{99}
360:
361: %\bibitem[Arendt et al 1998]{arendt}Arendt, R. et al 1998,Ap.J., 508, 74
362: {\bf REFERENCES}\\
363: Abraham, P. et a. 1998,in `The Universe as seen by ISO', eds. P. Cox \& M.F. Kessler,pp 145-148.\\
364: Arendt, R. et al 1998,Ap.J., 508, 74\\
365: Cambresy, L. 2001,Ap.J.,555,563\\
366: Cowie, L. et al. 1996, AJ,112,839\\
367: Cutri, R.M. (IPAC/Caltech), Skrutskie, M.F. (UMASS), et al (IPAC/Caltech)
368: http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/second/doc/explsup.html\\
369: De Propis et al 1999, Ap.J.,118,719\\
370: Djorgovski, S. et al 1995, Ap.J., 438, L13\\
371: Dole, H. et al 2001, A \& A, 372,364\\
372: Dwek, E. \& Arendt, R. 1998,Ap.J.,508,L9\\
373: Elbaz, D. et al 1999, A \& A, 351, L37\\
374: Gardner, J. 1996, in ``Unveiling the cosmic
375: infrared background", ed. E. Dwek, p. 127\\
376: Gardner, J.P. 1997, Ap.J.,480,L99\\
377: Gautier, D. 1992,AJ,103,1313\\
378: Gorjian, V., Wright, E.L. \& Chary, R.R. 2000,Ap.J.,536,550\\
379: Groth, E. \& Peebles, P.J.E. 1977,Ap.J.,217,385\\
380: Hauser, M. \& Dwek, E. 2001,ARAA,39,249\\
381: Jimenez, R. \& Kashlinsky, A. 1999,Ap.J.,511,16 (JK99)\\
382: Kashlinsky \& Odenwald 2000a, Ap.J., 528, 74\\
383: Kashlinsky \& Odenwald 2000b, Science, 289,246\\
384: Kelsall, T. et al 1998,Ap.J.,508,44\\
385: Loveday, J. 2000,MNRAS,312,L281\\
386: Madau, P. \& Pozzetti, L. 2000,MNRAS,312,L9\\
387: Matsumoto, M. et al 2000,in ``ISO surveys of a dusty Universe", eds. Lemke, D. et al. p.96.\\
388: Matsumoto, M. et al 2002, Ap.J., submitted.\\
389: Odenwald, Kashlinsky, Mather, Skrutskie and Cutri 2002, Ap.J.,submitted -
390: OKMSC\\
391: Wright, E.L. 1998,Ap.J.,496,1\\
392: Wright, E.L. \& Reese, E.D. 2000,Ap.J.,545,43\\
393: Yoshii, Y. \& Takahara, F. 1988,Ap.J.,326,1\\
394:
395: %\end{thebibliography}
396: \newpage
397: \centerline{\bf FIGURE CAPTIONS}
398:
399: Fig. 1 - The power spectrum of the diffuse emission in the final images is
400: shown with crosses with errors. Patch number is shown in the upper left corner
401: of the top panels. The number in the upper right corner of each panels shows the final $\sigma$ {\it after} de-striping. Open diamonds with 92\% errors show the fluctuation on larger angular scale from KO analysis of COBE DIRBE data. Thick
402: solid line shows the CIB result from IRTS analysis (Matsumoto et al 2002).
403: Filled small diamonds show the atmospheric contribution evaluated from 7.8 sec
404: exposure and divided by the average number of co-adds in the patch. The number
405: in the lower right corner gives the limiting magnitude for removing sources from the clipped patch.
406:
407: Fig. 2 - {\bf (a)} H--K vs J--K colors. Crosses correspond to fluctuations
408: in the final 2MASS images shown in Fig. 1. Square is the color of the
409: atmosphere. Ellipse corresponds to the locus of $\sim 10^5$ high latitude Galactic field stars from 2MASS data.
410: Plus denotes the position of the present day galaxies using SED from JK99.
411: Solid line show the evolution of colors out to $z$=2 using K-correction and SED
412: from JK99. Filled circle shows an example of colors from high-$z$ galaxies with
413: SED from JK99 assuming that they are at different $z$: $z$=0.7 in J, 0.5 in H
414: and 2 in K bands.
415: {\bf (b)} Cumulative flux distribution as function of K magnitude from galaxies
416: from deep galaxy surveys (e.g. Djorgovski et al 1995). Vertical lines denote the range of limiting magnitudes of clipped point sources in the seven patches.
417: {\bf (c)} Rate of CIB flux production vs $z$ assuming only K-correction in the
418: present-day population of galaxies. SED was taken from JK99. Solid, dashed and
419: dotted lines are for $(\Omega, \Omega_\Lambda)$ = (0.3,0.7), (0.3,0) and (1,0)
420: respectively. Thin lines of each type correspond to the largest clipping
421: magnitude galaxies (K=18.6 in Patch 2) and thick lines to the faintest (K=19 in
422: Patch 3).
423: {\bf (d)} Amplitude of the rms CIB flux fluctuation from Fig. 1 vs $\sigma$
424: {\it before} de-striping. The magnitude of the clipped out galaxies (and stars), $(m_J, m_H, m_K)$=(24.3,23.5,22.8)--$2.5 \log
425: \sigma$,
426: is shown on the top horizontal axis, where $A_m = 1.6, 0.8, 0$ in J, H, K bands
427: respectively. Triangles, squares and crosses correspond to J, H, K bands.
428: {\bf (e)} Power law index $n$ for the final power spectrum in Fig. 1 is plotted
429: vs the $\sigma$ before de-striping. Same symbol notation as in (d).
430:
431: \clearpage
432: \begin{figure}
433: \centering
434: \leavevmode
435: \epsfxsize=1.0
436: \columnwidth
437: \epsfbox{f1.ps}
438: \caption[]{
439: {\scriptsize{}
440: }
441: }
442: \end{figure}
443:
444: \clearpage
445: \begin{figure}
446: \centering
447: \leavevmode
448: \epsfxsize=1.0
449: \columnwidth
450: \epsfbox{f2.ps}
451: \caption[]{
452: {\scriptsize{}
453: }
454: }
455: \end{figure}
456:
457:
458: \end{document}
459:
460: