1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc1.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc1}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % if you have landscape tables
14: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
15:
16: % put your own definitions here:
17: % \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}
18: % \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]
19: % ...
20: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
21: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
22: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
23:
24: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
25: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
26:
27: % declarations for front matter
28: \title{Observations of Neutron-Capture Elements in the Early Galaxy}
29:
30: \author{
31: C. Sneden\address[TEXAS]{Department of Astronomy and McDonald
32: Observatory, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA}
33: \thanks{ The authors all thank our colleagues who have contributed
34: to the results presented here. Research supported by U.S. NSF
35: grant AST-9987162.},
36: J. J. Cowan\address[OKLA]{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
37: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA},\addressmark[TEXAS]
38: \thanks{Research supported by U.S. NSF grant AST-9986974.},
39: and J. E. Lawler\address[WISC]{Department of Physics,
40: University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA}
41: \thanks{Research supported by U.S. NSF grant AST-981940.}
42: }
43:
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: % typeset front matter
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: Neutron-capture elements in low metallicity Galactic halo stars
52: vary widely both in overall contents and detailed abundance patterns.
53: This review discusses recent observational results on the n-capture elements,
54: discussing the implications for early Galactic nucleosynthesis of:
55: (a) the star-to-star ``bulk'' variations in the n-capture/Fe abundance
56: ratios; (b) the distinct signature of rapid n-capture synthesis
57: events in many (most?) of the lowest metallicity stars; (c) the existence
58: of metal-poor stars heavily enriched in the products of slow n-capture
59: synthesis reactions; and (d) the now-routine detection of radioactive
60: thorium (and even uranium in one and possibly two cases) in the spectra
61: of metal-poor stars.
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64:
65:
66: \section{NEUTRON-CAPTURE ELEMENTS}
67:
68: Neutron-capture elements are those heavy elements whose isotopes are
69: primarily synthesized in neutron bombardment reactions; these include
70: all elements with Z~$>$~30.
71: The relative rates of neutron ingestion by nuclei compete with $\beta$-decay
72: rates to determine the final abundance distribution.
73: If the neutron flux is small enough that all unstable nuclei may undergo
74: $\beta$-decay between successive neutron captures, element synthesis proceeds
75: up the valley of $\beta$ stability.
76: This slow neutron addition is called the $s$-process, and occurs principally
77: in the He-burning zones of low and intermediate mass AGB stars.
78: If however the neutron flux is very large compared to $\beta$-decay rates,
79: extremely neutron-rich nuclei are created which then rapidly undergo
80: $\beta$-decay back toward stability.
81: This rapid neutron-capture ($n$-capture) synthesis, called the $r$-process,
82: can occur in several situations during supernova deaths of high-mass
83: stars and their creation of neutron-star remnants.
84:
85: Isotopes of the $n$-capture elements may be created by the
86: $s$-process, the $r$-process, or both.
87: The solar-system abundances of these isotopes have been built in
88: roughly equal measure of products of the $r$- and $s$-process.
89: The manner in which isotopic (and hence elemental) abundance fractions
90: are usually determined \cite{cam82,kap89,bur00} deserves comment here.
91: In the $s$-process the product of isotopic abundance and neutron-capture
92: cross-section is a well-defined slowly varying function of atomic mass,
93: which can be matched to the observed (meteoritic) abundances of isotopes
94: that only can be made in the $s$-process.
95: The $s$-process abundances of other isotopes can then be predicted from
96: this match.
97: Then the $r$-process abundances are either taken directly from
98: meteoritic data for $r$-only isotopes, or computed by subtraction of
99: the $s$-process amounts from the total abundances for those isotopes
100: that can be synthesized in both $n$-capture processes.
101: Finally, since only total elemental abundances may normally be determined
102: from stellar spectra, the isotopic $r$- and $s$-process isotopic
103: abundances for each element are summed.
104:
105: \begin{figure}[htb]
106: \includegraphics[width=35pc]{rands.eps}
107: \caption{Abundance distributions of $n$-capture elements in the solar
108: system, separated into their $r$-process-only and $s$-process-only
109: components \cite{bur00}, as functions of atomic number Z.
110: Abundances are given in standard stellar spectroscopic notation:
111: log~$\epsilon$(A)~$\equiv$ log$_{\rm 10}$(N$_{\rm A}$/N$_{\rm H}$)~+~12.0.}
112: \label{rands}
113: \end{figure}
114:
115: A recent re-assessment \cite{bur00} of the solar-system elemental
116: abundances is shown in Figure~\ref{rands}.
117: With this figure a caution must be given.
118: For those elements whose solar-system abundances are dominated by the
119: $s$-process (e.g. Sr, Ba, La), the small $r$-process component obtained
120: in the subtraction process carries with it the abundance uncertainty
121: estimate of the $s$-process component, and this value can in extreme
122: cases be as large as the inferred $r$-process abundance.
123: Thus the solar-system $r$-process abundance set should be treated with
124: some caution.
125: But for the foreseeable future this distribution will remain the
126: standard, because direct predictions of $r$-process abundances (e.g.,
127: \cite{gor97,cow99}) must rely on mass models of extremely neutron-rich
128: nuclei, almost none of which has ever been experimentally detected.
129: Theoretical assessments of the solar-system $s$- and $r$-process
130: abundances have also been made (e.g. \cite{arl99}), and these yield
131: similar results to those displayed in Figure~\ref{rands}).
132:
133:
134:
135: \section{NEUTRON-CAPTURE ELEMENTS AT LOW METALLICITY}
136:
137: A dominant aspect of $n$-capture element abundances in very metal-poor
138: halo stars is their extremely large variability ``in bulk'' with respect
139: to the Fe-peak elements (for early indications compare the abundances
140: reported for HD~122563 \cite{wal63} with those of HD~115444 \cite{gri82},
141: and for larger-sample surveys see, e.g., \cite{gil88,mcw95,rya96,car02}).
142: The observed star-to-star range in [$<n$-capture$>$/Fe] grows with decreasing
143: metallicity, exceeding observational errors at [Fe/H]~$\approx$ --2.0
144: and reaching a scatter factor of more than a thousand below
145: [Fe/H]~$\approx$ --2.5 (e.g., Figure~12 of \cite{car02}).
146: The lowest metallicity stars are usually faint and high resolution
147: spectra of them requires the use of 8m-class telescopes.
148:
149: Proof of the star-to-star $n$-capture scatter can be had
150: through simple spectrum comparisons of relatively bright stars,
151: as has been done by \cite{bur00}, whose Figure~3 is adapted as our
152: Figure~\ref{threespec4}.
153: The two stars shown here have almost identical atmospheric parameters,
154: and the spectral region of the top figure panel suggests
155: that their metallicities and light element abundance ratios are about
156: the same.
157: But the $n$-capture element features have strengths that differ
158: by nearly a factor of ten, and it is easy to show that derived abundances
159: of these elements differ by the same amount with little dependence
160: on atmospheric modeling uncertainties.
161: And the large star-to-star scatter can probably have only one interpretation:
162: the influence of individual and localized nucleosynthesis events in
163: short-lived stars in a poorly-mixed early Galactic halo.
164:
165: A second feature of $n$-capture elements in metal-poor stars is the
166: general trend toward pure $r$-process signatures (at least for
167: elements with Z~$\geq$~56) at lowest metallicities.
168: Significant exceptions to this trend are known to exist.
169: In particular
170: there are some stars with [Fe/H]~$<$ --2.0 with large overabundances
171: of C and $s$-process-dominated elements such as Sr, Ba and even Pb
172: (e.g. \cite{eck01,aok02}).
173: Such objects may have received these enhanced abundances via mass transfer
174: from a former AGB companion star.
175: A more thorough discussion of these important stars has been given by
176: S. G. Ryan at this conference, and will not be commented upon further here.
177:
178: For more ``normal'' low metallicity stars, a downward trend in [Ba/Eu]
179: is observed with decreasing metallicity (the pioneering observational
180: and theoretical work here were done by \cite{spi78,tru81}, and for
181: a recent summary see Figure~3 of \cite{cow01} and Figure~7 of \cite{bur00}).
182: This decrease, which tends toward [Ba/Eu]~$\approx$ --1.0 below
183: [Fe/H]~$\approx$ --2.5, is qualitatively and quantitatively in agreement
184: with essentially complete absence of products of $s$-process synthesis
185: in the most metal-poor stars.
186: The trend combined with the large star-to-star scatter in the bulk amounts
187: of the $n$-capture elements noted above rounds out the suggested picture
188: of $r$-process synthesis occurring in and around the supernova deaths
189: of high mass, very low metallicity stars, and seeding their local ISM
190: out of which quickly formed the metal-poor stars that we observe today.
191:
192: \begin{figure}[htb]
193: \includegraphics[width=33pc]{threespec4.eps}
194: \caption{Comparison of the spectra of two metal-poor giant stars
195: in a wavelength region dominated by Fe-peak species features (top panel),
196: and in two regions with significant $n$-capture features.
197: This figure is adapted from Figure~3 of \cite{bur00}.
198: These two stars have very similar atmospheric parameters and
199: metallicities: T$_{eff}$~= 4650~K, log~g~= 1.50, v$_t$~= 1.7 km~s$^{-1}$,
200: [Fe/H]~= --2.4.}
201: \label{threespec4}
202: \end{figure}
203:
204: Unfortunately another undeniable aspect of the [Ba/Eu] trend with metallicity
205: is its large scatter at any [Fe/H] value.
206: It is possible (even likely) that some of the scatter is intrinsic
207: to the stars, caused by $s$-processing even in the early Galaxy.
208: Some of the very metal-poor stars with [Ba/Eu] ratios much greater than the
209: $r$-process value probably have undergone some a transfer episode from
210: a higher mass companion which is now a compact object.
211: But a lot of the [Ba/Eu] scatter must be due to observational and
212: analytical uncertainties, particularly in the derivation of Ba abundances.
213: Usually just the very few strong Ba~II low-excitation lines are available
214: for analysis, and these features are saturated in cool giants that are
215: most often studied at low metallicities.
216:
217: There are two approaches that can mitigate this problem.
218: First, Ba abundances should be determined for main sequence stars,
219: as has been recently done in \cite{car02}.
220: The Ba~II lines are intrinsically much weaker in upper main sequence
221: stars than they are in giants of similar metallicity.
222: The problem with this approach lies in simultaneous detection of
223: Eu~II features, which become almost undetectably weak in very low metallicity
224: main sequence stars.
225: Second, instead of using Ba~II lines, a switch could profitably be made to
226: analyses of La~II (which is also predominantly an $s$-process product
227: in solar-system material).
228: This species offers several analytical advantages: (a) La has just one
229: stable isotope, compared with five abundant ones for Ba; (b) La~II lines are
230: more numerous and weaker than Ba~II lines, and usually are of comparable
231: strengths to those of Eu~II; and (c) accurate transition probabilities and
232: hyperfine structure parameters are known for many La~II lines \cite{law01a}.
233: Preliminary results of a new large-sample study of [La/Eu] have been
234: given in \cite{sim02}, and they show a smaller star-to-star scatter
235: than does [Ba/Eu] and the same trend to a pure $r$-process ratio
236: at lowest metallicities.
237: The use of La~II instead of Ba ~II lines is recommended for judging the
238: $s$-process contents of all stars where the $n$-capture features all
239: are strong.
240:
241:
242:
243:
244:
245:
246: \section{DETAILED ABUNDANCE DISTRIBUTIONS IN $r$-PROCESS-RICH STARS}
247:
248: A few very metal-poor stars have been discovered to have both very large
249: overall $n$-capture element contents (here arbitrarily defined as
250: [Eu/Fe]~$\sim$ +1 or greater) and nearly pure $r$-process signatures
251: among these elements.
252: Such stars include HD~115444 ([Fe/H]~= --2.9, [Eu/Fe]~= +0.9 \cite{wes00}),
253: CS~22892-052 ([Fe/H]~= --3.1, [Eu/Fe]~= +1.6 \cite{sne00}),
254: BD+17~3248 ([Fe/H]~= --2.1, [Eu/Fe]~= +0.9 \cite{cow02}),
255: and CS~31082-001 ([Fe/H]~= --2.9, [Eu/Fe]~= +1.6 \cite{hil02}).
256: Such stars are excellent laboratories for the study of $n$-capture
257: elements because their normally dominant Fe-peak transitions are
258: very weak in these low metallicity stars, and the relative overabundances
259: of the $n$-capture elements reveals many spectral features that
260: are normally hidden in stellar spectra.
261: For example, Tb~II lines are much more readily identified in the
262: spectrum of CS~22892-052 than they are in the solar spectrum \cite{law01b}.
263:
264: In Figure~\ref{abnic7} we summarize the current \cite{sne02} CS~22892-052
265: $n$-capture elemental abundance set, comparing it
266: to the scaled solar-system abundance distribution \cite{bur00}.
267: The abundance matches shown here lead to the following brief comments,
268: reemphasizing some conclusions from our previous contributions.
269:
270: First, for the 17 observed stable elements with Z~$\geq$~56, a near-perfect
271: match exists with the scaled solar-system $r$-process curve.
272: The fit is good enough that elements which either deviate
273: from the solar curve (e.g. Er) or have large line-to-line scatter (e.g. Nd)
274: point to areas for further study in nuclear and atomic physics,
275: respectively.
276: Comparing the abundances shown here to those of the first large abundance
277: study of CS 22892-052 \cite{sne96}, the major sharpening of the
278: newer abundance results (smaller line-to-line scatters) may be traced to
279: several recent extensive lab studies of rare-earth elements (for
280: reviews and comments on recent work in this area see \cite{wah02,sne02b}).
281: Note finally that the excellent agreement with scaled solar system
282: abundances now has been extended to isotopic abundances for Eu
283: in three $r$-process-rich stars \cite{sne02c}.
284:
285: Second, elements of the third $n$-capture peak (76~$\leq$~Z~$\leq$~82)
286: have their transitions mainly below 3500~\AA, and thus some of these
287: abundances have been obtained from HST STIS observations.
288: It is more difficult to derive reliable abundances in the UV because
289: even very metal-poor giants have rich atomic and molecular line spectra
290: in this wavelength regime.
291: Even so, the abundances of this element group are consistent with
292: the same scaled solar curve that matches the abundances of the rare-earth
293: elements.
294:
295: Third, the long-lived radioactive element Th is detected in CS~22892-052
296: and indeed it has been observed in many metal-poor giants \cite{fra93,joh01}.
297: The derived Th abundance, when ratioed to the abundance of a stable
298: $n$-capture element (usually taken to be Eu) can lead to age estimates
299: for the oldest stars of the Galaxy.
300: The prospects and problems of such nucleocosmochronology have been
301: discussed in several papers (e.g. \cite{cow99,gor01,sch02}) and space
302: does not permit further discussion here.
303: An exciting new development has been the detection of U, a second
304: chronometer element, in CS~31082-001 \cite{hil02} and its ratio with
305: respect to Th indicates a decay age of about 15~Gyr, in agreement
306: with other kinds of Galactic age estimates.
307: See also \cite{cow02} for an additional tentative detection of U in
308: a metal-poor halo star and a similar radioactive age estimate.
309:
310: Fourth, lighter $n$-capture elements, those with 38~$\leq$~Z~$\leq$~50,
311: show some deviations from the scaled solar $r$-process distribution,
312: particularly for Y, Mo, Pd, and Ag.
313: One caution must be given here, that for most of these elements the number
314: of lines participating in the derived abundance is significantly smaller
315: than the number available for abundance determinations of rare earth
316: elements; hence the generally larger error estimates that we attach
317: to these points.
318: Suggestions that the $r$-process nucleosynthetic history of the lighter
319: $n$-capture elements may be complex began with \cite{was96} and has
320: no clear resolution today.
321: The deviations may signal the presence of a second type of $r$-process as
322: proposed in \cite{qia00}.
323: Alternatively, models have been suggested that can synthesize the whole
324: range of these observed abundances in one site (e.g. \cite{cam01})
325:
326: Fifth, the lightest elements attributed mostly to $n$-capture processes
327: cannot be detected on our CS~22892-052 spectra, and the derived upper
328: limits to their abundances are more than an order of magnitude below
329: the scaled solar $r$-process curve.
330: Clearly these two elements either owe their origin to a different
331: nucleosynthetic process or the $r$-process simply may have pushed beyond
332: these elements.
333:
334:
335: \begin{figure}[htb]
336: \includegraphics[width=35pc]{abnic7.eps}
337: \caption{Observed $n$-capture abundances \cite{sne02} in the halo giant star
338: CS~22892-052 compared to the $r$-process solar-system abundance distribution
339: of Figure~1, scaled to match the observed Eu abundance.
340: The error bars on the observed points represent the sample standard
341: deviations of the abundances of each element.}
342: \label{abnic7}
343: \end{figure}
344:
345:
346:
347:
348:
349: \section{SUMMARY}
350:
351: A rich variety of $n$-capture abundance distributions has been found
352: in low metallicity Galactic halo stars, and discoveries of new stars
353: with unique chemical composition mixes show no signs of abating.
354: Early Galactic nucleosynthesis has littered the halo with many clues,
355: and it will take the combined efforts of astronomers working with halo
356: low resolution surveys, stellar spectroscopists, lab and theoretical
357: atomic physicists, experimental and theoretical nuclear physicists,
358: and supernova modelers to properly decode the messages contained in
359: the $n$-capture abundances of metal-poor stars.
360:
361:
362:
363:
364:
365:
366:
367: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
368:
369: \bibitem{cam82} A. G. W. Cameron, Ap. Sp. Sci., 82 (1982) 123.
370:
371: \bibitem{kap89} F. K\"appeler, H. Beer, and K. Wisshak, Rep. Prog. Phys.,
372: 52 (1989) 945.
373:
374: \bibitem{bur00} D. L. Burris, C. A. Pilachowski, T. L. Armandroff,
375: C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan, and H. Roe, Ap. J., 544 (2000) 302
376:
377: \bibitem{gor97} S. Goriely and M. Arnould, Astr. Ap., 322 (1997) L29.
378:
379: \bibitem{cow99} J. J. Cowan, B. Pfeiffer, K.-L. Kratz, F.-K. Thielemann,
380: C. Sneden, S. Burles, D. Tytler, and T. C. Beers,
381: Ap. J., 521 (1999) 194.
382:
383: \bibitem{arl99} C. Arlandini, F. K\"appeler, K. Wisshak, R. Gallino,
384: M. Lugaro, M. Busso, and O. Staniero, Ap. J. 525 (1999) 886
385:
386: \bibitem{wal63} G. Wallerstein, J. L. Greenstein, R. Parker, H. L. Helfer,
387: and L. H. Aller, Ap. J., 137 (1963) 280.
388:
389: \bibitem{gri82} R. Griffin, R. Griffin, B. Gustafsson, and T. Vieira,
390: Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 198 (1982) 637.
391:
392: \bibitem{gil88} K. K. Gilroy, C. Sneden, C. A. Pilachowski, and
393: J. J. Cowan, Ap. J. 327 (1988) 298.
394:
395: \bibitem{mcw95} A. McWilliam, G. W. Preston, C. Sneden, and S. Shectman,
396: Astr. J. 109 (1995) 2736.
397:
398: \bibitem{rya96} S. G. Ryan, J. E. Norris, and T. C. Beers, Ap. J.
399: 471 (1996) 254.
400:
401: \bibitem{car02} E. Carretta, R. Gratton, J. G. Cohen, T. C. Beers,
402: and N. Christlieb, Astr. J., 124 (2002) 481.
403:
404: \bibitem{eck01} S. Van Eck, S. Goriely, A. Jorissen, and B. Plez,
405: Nature, 412 (2001) 793.
406:
407: \bibitem{aok02} W. Aoki, J. E. Norris, S. G. Ryan, T. C. Beers, and
408: H. Ando, Ap. J., 576 (2002) L141.
409:
410: \bibitem{spi78} M. Spite and F. Spite, Astr. Ap. 67 (1978) 23.
411:
412: \bibitem{tru81} J. W. Truran, Astr. Ap., 97 (1981) 391
413:
414: \bibitem{cow01} J. J. Cowan, C. Sneden, and J. W. Truran, in Relativistic
415: Astrophysics: 20$^{th}$ Texas Symposium, eds. J. C. Wheeler and
416: H. Martel (2001) 337.
417:
418: \bibitem{law01a} J. E. Lawler, G. Bonvallet, and C. Sneden,
419: ApJ, 556 (2001) 452.
420:
421: \bibitem{sim02} J. Simmerer and C. Sneden, Bull. Am. Astr. Soc., 33 (2002) 1512
422:
423: \bibitem{wes00} J. Westin, C. Sneden, B. Gustafsson, and J. J. Cowan,
424: Ap. J., 530 (2000) 783
425:
426: \bibitem{sne00} C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan, I. I. Ivans, G. Fuller, S. Burles,
427: T. C. Beers, and J. E. Lawler, Ap. J., 533 (2000) L139.
428:
429: \bibitem{cow02} J. J. Cowan et al., Ap. J., 572 (2002) 861
430:
431: \bibitem{hil02} V. Hill et al., Astr. Ap., 387 (2002) 560
432:
433: \bibitem{law01b} J. E. Lawler, M. E. Wickliffe, C. R. Cowley, and
434: C. Sneden, Ap. J. Supp., 137 (2001) 341.
435:
436: \bibitem{sne02} C. Sneden et al., Ap. J., to be submitted (2002).
437:
438: \bibitem{sne96} C. Sneden, A. McWilliam, G. W. Preston, J. J. Cowan,
439: D. L. Burris, and B. J. Armosky, Ap. J., 467 (1996) 819
440:
441: \bibitem{wah02} G. M. Wahlgren, Phys. Scr., T100 (2002) 22.
442:
443: \bibitem{sne02b} C. Sneden, J. E. Lawler, and J. J. Cowan,
444: Phys. Scr., T100 (2002) 22.
445:
446: \bibitem{sne02c} C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan, J. E. Lawler, S. Burles,
447: T. C. Beeers, and G. M. Fuller, Ap. J., 566 (2002) L25.
448:
449: \bibitem{fra93} P. Fran\c{c}ois, M. Spite, and F. Spite, Astr. Ap.,
450: 274 (1993) 821
451:
452: \bibitem{joh01} J. A. Johnson and M. Bolte, Ap. J., 554 (2001) 888.
453:
454: \bibitem{gor01} S. Goriely and M. Arnould, Astr. Ap., 379 (2001) 1113.
455:
456: \bibitem{sch02} H. Schatz, R. Toenjes, B. Pfeiffer, T. C. Beers, J. J. Cowan,
457: and K.-L. Kratz, Ap. J., (2002) in press.
458:
459: \bibitem{was96} G. J. Wasserburg, M. Busso, and R. Gallino, Ap. J.,
460: 466 (1996) 109.
461:
462: \bibitem{qia00} Y.-Z. Qian and G. J. Wasserburg, Phys. Rep., 333 (2000), 77.
463:
464: \bibitem{cam01} A. G. W. Cameron, Ap. J., 562 (2001) 456.
465:
466: \end{thebibliography}
467:
468: \end{document}
469:
470:
471: