1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \doublespace
6:
7: \title{Comment on ``Chandra Reveals X-ray Glint in the Cat's Eye''}
8:
9: \author{Holly L. Maness\altaffilmark{1,2}}
10: \author{S. D. Vrtilek\altaffilmark{2}}
11:
12: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112}
13: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138}
14:
15: \begin{abstract}
16:
17: \citet{Chu01} report that they find the diffuse X-ray emission from
18: the Cat's Eye Nebula, NGC 6543,
19: to be inconsistent with nebular abundances but consistent with
20: abundances expected for the stellar wind although the location and the
21: derived temperature for the X-ray emitting
22: region of NGC 6543 require that a significant fraction of the
23: X-ray emitting material be nebular.
24: A recent determination by \citet{BS03} of nebular
25: abundances in NGC 6543 incorporating infrared,
26: optical, and ultraviolet observations provides
27: a resolution of this
28: apparent anomaly.
29:
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \keywords {planetary nebulae: general--planetary nebulae:
33: individual (NGC 6543)--stars: winds, outflows--X-rays: ISM}
34:
35: \clearpage
36:
37: \citet{Chu01} found that the X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543
38: could be adequately fit using stellar wind abundances but not with
39: abundances that had been reported for the nebular material in this
40: object \citep{Aller83, Pwa84,
41: Manchado89,
42: deKoter96}.
43: \citet{Chu01} emphasized that the low
44: temperature they derive
45: for the X-ray emitting material (1.7$\times 10^6$K) is
46: puzzling since
47: the expected postshock temperature for the fast (1750 km s$^{-1}$)
48: stellar wind of NGC 6543 is of the order of 10$^8$K.
49: They also note that the location of the X-ray emitting gas
50: requires that a significant fraction of the X-ray emitting material be
51: nebular.
52: Here we re-analyze the {\it Chandra} X-ray Observatory ACIS-S spectrum
53: of NGC 6543 using updated abundances found for the nebular
54: material in an attempt
55: to resolve this apparent anomaly.
56:
57:
58: Consistent with the work of \citet{Chu01} we extracted spectra
59: from four regions: the entire nebula and three
60: regions corresponding to the central elliptical
61: shell, the northern extension, and the southern extension.
62: We are
63: able to reproduce
64: the spectral results of
65: \citet{Chu01}, finding that the stellar wind abundances they used
66: modeled the
67: observed X-ray spectrum much better than the abundances they
68: used for the nebula.
69:
70: However, recently
71: \citet{BS03} re-determined the nebular
72: abundances in NGC 6543 using
73: multiple observations in the infrared, optical, and ultraviolet.
74: They find a N/O abundance ratio that is significantly increased
75: from that of previous measurements and used by \citet{Chu01}.
76: Here we use the \citet{BS03} abundances
77: in the
78: VMEKAL (variable abundance thin plasma
79: emission) model in the X-ray analysis package XSPEC \citep{AR96}.
80: These are listed in Table 1 as abundances relative to Solar using
81: \citet{Grevesse98} values for Solar abundance.
82: All elements fit by VMEKAL that are not determined by \citet{BS03} are
83: kept at
84: Solar abundances.
85: We fit this new nebular model
86: with only temperature, absorption column density,
87: and the normalization factor as free parameters to the X-ray spectrum
88: extracted from the entire nebula. The fits
89: produced good results, giving significantly
90: lower $\chi^2$ ($\chi_{\nu}^2$=1.3) than
91: both the nebular ($\chi_{\nu}^2$=1.8) and the stellar
92: wind ($\chi_{\nu}^2$=1.6) models proposed by
93: \citet{Chu01}. Allowing important abundances to vary does
94: not significantly lower $\chi^2$. This new nebular model
95: (plotted with the
96: spectrum extracted from the entire nebula in Figure 1a) gives a plasma
97: temperature of {\it T} = 1.8 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ K and an absorption
98: column density of {\it N}$_H$ = 2.5 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.
99: The reduced $\chi^2$ as a function of {\it N}$_H$ and {\it kT} is
100: plotted in Figure 1b. The 99\% confidence contour
101: spans {\it N}$_H$ = (2.0-3.5) $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ and {\it T}
102: = (1.54-1.66) $\times$ 10$^{6}$ K. For the energy range 0.2-1.5 keV
103: we obtain
104: an absorbed X-ray flux of 9.1 $\times$ 10$^{-14}$ ergs
105: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and an unabsorbed flux of 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{-13}$ ergs
106: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. Assuming a distance of 1$\pm0.3$ kpc \citep{Cahn92,Reed99},
107: this gives a 0.2-1.5 keV X-ray luminosity of
108: 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{31}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.
109:
110: Fits to the spectra extracted from the central shell
111: and the northern and southern extensions using the \citet{BS03}
112: abundances
113: do not produce significantly different results from those reported
114: earlier:
115: consistent with the work of \citet{Miranda92}
116: and \citet{Chu01},
117: our fits suggest that temperature appears uniform across the
118: X-ray emitting region of NGC
119: 6543 with no significant variations detected whereas
120: the intervening absorption is
121: greater for the southern extension ({\it N}$_H$ = 4.3$\pm.02\times$
122: 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$) and the central shell
123: ({\it N}$_H$ = 3.7$\pm.02\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$) than
124: for the northern extension ({\it N}$_H$ = 1.2$\pm.08\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$).
125:
126: We would like to thank J.Bernard-Salas, S.R.Pottasch, P.R.Wesselius
127: and W.A.Feibelman for providing us their results prior to publication.
128: H.M. was supported by the NSF REU program at SAO.
129: SDV was supported in part by NASA grant NAG5-6711.
130:
131: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
132: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
133: \tablecolumns{4}
134: \tablewidth{0pt}
135: \tablecaption{Abundances (relative to Solar) used to fit X-ray Spectra}
136: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\colhead{}&\colhead{This paper}}
137: \tablehead{\colhead{Element}&\colhead{Chu Nebular}
138: &\colhead{Chu Stellar}&\colhead{Bernard-Salas Nebular}}
139: \startdata
140: He&1.13&60&1\\
141: C&0.63&1&0.18\\
142: N&0.53&3&3.97\\
143: O&0.66&1&0.7\\
144: Ne&1.14&1&1.25\\
145: S&1&1&0.45\\
146: Ar&1&1&1.24\\
147: \enddata
148: \end{deluxetable}
149:
150: \begin{thebibliography}{}
151: \bibitem[Aller \& Czyzak(1983)]{Aller83} Aller, L.~H.~\&
152: Czyzak, S.~J.\ 1983, \apjs, 51, 211
153: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{AR96} Arnaud, K.A., 1996, in Astronomical Data
154: Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. Jacoby G. and Barnes J., ASP
155: Conf. Series volume 101,17
156: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2003)]{BS03} Bernard-Salas, J.,
157: Pottasch, S.R., Wesselius, P.R.,
158: \& Feibelman, W.A. \ 2003, A\&A, submitted.
159: \bibitem[Balucinska-Church \& McCammon(1992)]{Balucinska92}
160: Balucinska-Church, M.~\& McCammon, D.\ 1992, \apj, 400, 699
161: \bibitem[Cahn, Kaler, \& Stanghellini(1992)]{Cahn92} Cahn,
162: J.~H., Kaler, J.~B., \& Stanghellini, L.\ 1992, \aaps, 94, 399
163: \bibitem[Chu et al.(2001)]{Chu01} Chu, Y., Guerrero, M.~;.,
164: Gruendl, R.~A., Williams, R.~M., \& Kaler, J.~B.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L69
165: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{Grevesse98} Grevesse, N.~\&
166: Sauval, A.J.\ 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
167: \bibitem[de Koter, Hubeny, Heap, \& Lanz(1996)]{deKoter96} de
168: Koter, A., Hubeny, I., Heap, S.~R., \& Lanz, T.\ 1996, ASP Conf.~Ser.~96:
169: Hydrogen Deficient Stars, 141
170: Sauval, A.~J.\ 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
171: \bibitem[Manchado \& Pottasch(1989)]{Manchado89} Manchado, A.~\&
172: Pottasch, S.~R.\ 1989, \aap, 222, 219
173: \bibitem[Miranda \& Solf(1992)]{Miranda92} Miranda, L.~F.~\&
174: Solf, J.\ 1992, \aap, 260, 397
175: \bibitem[Pwa, Pottasch, \& Mo(1984)]{Pwa84} Pwa, T.~H.,
176: Pottasch, S.~R., \& Mo, J.~E.\ 1984, \aap, 139, L1
177: \bibitem[Raymond \& Smith(1977)]{Raymond77} Raymond, J.~C.~\&
178: Smith, B.~W.\ 1977, \apjs, 35, 419
179: \bibitem[Reed et al.(1999)]{Reed99} Reed, D.~S., Balick, B.,
180: Hajian, A.~R., Klayton, T.~L., Giovanardi, S., Casertano, S., Panagia, N.,
181: \& Terzian, Y.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2430
182: \end{thebibliography}
183:
184: \clearpage
185: \begin{figure}
186: \centering
187: (a)
188: \scalebox{0.3}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f1.eps}}}
189:
190: (b)
191: \scalebox{0.3}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}}
192: \caption{(a) X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 with new nebular model
193: overlaid. (b) $\chi^2$ grid plots of nebular model spectral fit. The
194: contours represent 68$\%$ (1 $\sigma$), 90$\%$ (2 $\sigma$), and 99$\%$ (3
195: $\sigma$) confidence levels. \label{new_6543}}
196: \end{figure}
197:
198: \end{document}
199: