1: %

2: % The Velocity Dispersion Profile of M15: 

3: % Observations and Dynamical Modeling

4: %

5: % Addendum to Dull et al 1997, ApJ, 481, 267

6: %

7: % Submitted to ApJ: 25-Oct-02

8: %

9: 

10: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}

11: \usepackage{multicol}

12: 

13: \voffset -0.25in

14: \hoffset +0.0in

15: 

16: \newcommand{\ea}{et al.}

17: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}} 

18: 

19: \makeatletter

20: \newenvironment{tablehere}

21:   {\def\@captype{table}}

22:   {}

23: 

24: \newenvironment{figurehere}

25:   {\def\@captype{figure}}

26:   {}

27:   \makeatother

28: \columnsep 28pt

29: 

30: 

31: \defcitealias{dull97}{D97}

32: 

33: \slugcomment{}

34: \shorttitle{The Dynamics of M15}

35: \shortauthors{Dull et al.}

36: 

37: \begin{document}

38: 

39: \title{ADDENDUM: ``THE DYNAMICS OF M15: OBSERVATIONS OF THE VELOCITY DISPERSION

40:        PROFILE AND FOKKER-PLANCK MODELS'' (ApJ, 481, 267 [1997])}

41: 

42: \author{J.D. Dull\altaffilmark{1}, H.N. Cohn\altaffilmark{2},

43: P.M. Lugger\altaffilmark{2}, B.W. Murphy\altaffilmark{3},

44: P.O. Seitzer\altaffilmark{4}, P.J. Callanan\altaffilmark{5}, 

45: R.G.M. Rutten\altaffilmark{6}, P.A. Charles\altaffilmark{7}}

46: 

47: 

48: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Albertson College of Idaho,

49: 2112 Cleveland Blvd., Caldwell, ID 83605}

50: 

51: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, Indiana University, 

52: 727 E. Third Street, Bloomington, IN  47405}

53: 

54: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,

55: Butler University, 4600 Sunset Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46208}

56: 

57: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan,

58: 830 Dennison Bldg., Ann Arbor, MI  48109}

59: 

60: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, National University of Ireland,

61: University College, Cork, Ireland}

62: 

63: \altaffiltext{6}{Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de correos 321,

64: E-38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Tenerife, Spain}

65: 

66: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton,

67: Southhampton SO17~1BJ, UK}

68: 

69: \email{cohn@astro.indiana.edu, bmurphy@butler.edu}

70: 

71: 

72: ~~ 

73: \begin{multicols}{2}

74: 

75: It has recently come to our attention that there are axis scale errors

76: in three of the figures presented in \citet[][hereafter D97]{dull97}.

77: This paper presented Fokker-Planck models for the collapsed-core

78: globular cluster M15 that include a dense, centrally concentrated

79: population of neutron stars and massive white dwarfs.  These models do

80: not include a central black hole.  Figure 12 of D97, which presents

81: the predicted mass-to-light profile, is of particular interest, since

82: it was used by \citet{gers02a} as an input to their Jeans equation

83: analysis of the HST-STIS velocity measurements reported by

84: \citet{mare02}.  Based on the original, incorrect version of Figure

85: 12, \citet{gers02a} concluded that the D97 models can only fit the new

86: data with the addition of an intermediate-mass black hole.  However,

87: this is counter to our previous finding, shown in Figure 6 of

88: \citetalias{dull97}, that the Fokker-Planck models predict the sort of

89: moderately rising velocity dispersion profile that \citet{gers02a}

90: infer from the new data.  \citet{baum02} have independently noted this

91: apparent inconsistency.

92: 

93: We appreciate the thoughtful cooperation of Roeland van der Marel in

94: resolving this issue.  Using our corrected version of Figure 12 (see

95: below), \citet{gers02b} now find that the velocity dispersion profile

96: that they infer from the \citetalias{dull97} mass-to-light ratio

97: profile is entirely consistent with the velocity dispersion profile

98: presented in Figure 6 of \citetalias{dull97}.  \citet{gers02b} further

99: find that there is no statistically significant difference between the fit

100: to the \citet{mare02} velocity measurements provided by the

101: \citetalias{dull97} intermediate-phase model and that provided by

102: their model, which supplements this \citetalias{dull97} model with a

103: $1.7_{-1.7}^{+2.7}\times10^3~M_\odot$ black hole.  Thus, the choice

104: between models with and without black holes will require additional

105: model predictions and observational tests.

106: 

107: We present corrected versions of Figures 9, 10, and 12 of

108: \citetalias{dull97}.  We take responsibility for the errors in the

109: original versions of these figures and regret any confusion that these

110: may have caused.  We also present an expanded version of Figure 6,

111: which extends the radial scale to both smaller and larger values, in

112: order to show the full run of the velocity dispersion profile.  The

113: profile of the intermediate-phase model of \citetalias{dull97} is

114: in good agreement with the HST-STIS velocity dispersion profile

115: presented by \citet{gers02a}.  In particular, the central value of

116: $\sim14~\kms$, predicted by this model, nicely coincides with their

117: findings.

118: 

119: We note that three independent studies have now demonstrated that

120: there is a dense, central concentration of dark mass in M15, by use of

121: three alternative methods: Fokker-Planck simulations

122: \citepalias{dull97}, GRAPE-6 simulations \citep{baum02}, and Jeans

123: equation modeling \citep{gers02a, gers02b}.  The dark mass is proposed

124: to consist of neutron stars and massive white dwarfs, in the former

125: two studies, versus a central black hole in the latter.  Irrespective

126: of these different interpretations of the nature of the dark mass, its

127: presence now appears to be well established on dynamical grounds.

128: 

129: \end{multicols}

130: ~~\bigskip

131: 

132: \setlength{\columnsep}{50pt}

133: 

134: \begin{thebibliography}{}

135: \begin{multicols}{2}

136: 

137: \bibitem[Baumgardt et al.(2002)]{baum02} Baumgardt, H., Hut, P.,

138: Makino, J., McMillan, S. Portegies Zwart, S. 2002, \apjl, submitted

139: (astro-ph/0210133)

140: 

141: \bibitem[Dull et al.(1997)]{dull97} Dull, J. D., Cohn, H. N., Lugger,

142: P. M., Murphy, B. W., Seitzer, P. O., Callanan, P. J., Rutten,

143: R. G. M., \& Charles, P. A. \apj, 481, 267 (D97)

144: 

145: \bibitem[Gebhardt et al.(1994)]{gebh94} Gebhardt, K., Pryor, C., Williams,

146: T. B., \& Hesser, J. E.  1994, \aj, 107, 2067

147: 

148: \bibitem[Gerssen et al.(2002a)]{gers02a} Gerssen, J., van der Marel,

149: R. P., Gebhardt, K., Guhathakurta, P., \& Pryor, C. 2002a, \aj, in

150: press (astro-ph/0209315)

151: 

152: \bibitem[Gerssen et al.(2002b)]{gers02b} Gerssen, J., van der Marel,

153: R. P., Gebhardt, K., Guhathakurta, P., \& Pryor, C. 2002b, \aj, in

154: press (astro-ph/0210158)

155: 

156: \bibitem[van der Marel et al.(2002)]{mare02} van der Marel, R. P.,

157: Gerssen, J., Guhatha\-kurta, P., Peterson, R., \& Gebhardt, K. 2002,

158: \aj, in press (astro-ph/0209314)

159: 

160: \end{multicols}

161: \end{thebibliography}

162: 

163: 

164: \newpage

165: 

166: \setlength{\columnsep}{35pt}

167: \begin{multicols}{2}

168: 

169: \begin{figurehere}

170: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f6.eps}

171: {Fig.~6.--- Velocity dispersion versus radius for stars in M15\@.  The

172: filled squares are the data from \citetalias{dull97} and the open

173: circles represent the \citet{gebh94} data.  The radial scale has been

174: extended both inwards and outwards, relative to the original version

175: of this figure, to allow comparison with the much broader radial

176: coverage that is now available.}

177: \end{figurehere}

178: 

179: \begin{figurehere}

180: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f9.eps}

181: {Fig.~9.--- The LOS acceleration as produced by the mean-field

182: gravitational potential of the best-fitting models.  The data symbol

183: indicates the minimum LOS acceleration needed to account for the

184: negative period derivatives of PSR~2127+11A (lower horizontal line)

185: and PSR~2127+11D (upper horizontal line); the pulsars lie at nearly

186: the same distance from the cluster center.  The radial scale of this

187: figure has been corrected from the original version, increasing every

188: radius by a factor of 2.82.  The top and bottom axes have been

189: interchanged, for consistency with the other figures.}

190: \end{figurehere}

191: \end{multicols}

192: 

193: 

194: \newpage

195: 

196: \begin{multicols*}{2}

197: 

198: \begin{figurehere}

199: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f10.eps}

200: {Fig.~10.--- Surface density profiles for the six mass groups of the

201: intermediate-phase Fokker-Planck model.  At small radius, the curves

202: are arrayed in order of increasing stellar mass, illustrating the

203: effect of mass segregation.  Note that groups 1 and 2 (neutron stars

204: and heavy white dwarfs) are strongly centrally concentrated relative

205: to the luminous stars.  The vertical scale of this figure has been

206: corrected from the original version, increasing all of the densities

207: by a factor of 2.53.}

208: \end{figurehere}

209: 

210: \begin{figurehere}

211: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f12.eps}

212: {Fig.~12.--- Mass-to-light ratio profile for the three best-fitting

213: Fokker-Planck models and the King model.  $M/L$ is calculated as the

214: ratio of surface mass density to surface brightness.  The strong rise in

215: $M/L$ at small radius is due to the centrally concentrated populations

216: of nonluminous remnants seen in Figs.~10 and 11.  The radial scale of this

217: figure has been corrected from the original version, increasing every

218: radius by a factor of 2.82.  The top and bottom axes have been

219: interchanged, for consistency with the other figures.}

220: \end{figurehere}

221: \end{multicols*}

222: 

223: 

224: \end{document}

225: 

226: 

227: Abstract for xxx.lanl.gov:

228: 

229: 

230: It has recently come to our attention that there are axis scale errors

231: in three of the figures of Dull et al. (1997, hereafter D97).  D97

232: presented Fokker-Planck models for the collapsed-core globular cluster

233: M15 that include a dense, centrally concentrated population of neutron

234: stars and massive white dwarfs, but do not include a central black

235: hole.  In this Addendum, we present corrected versions of Figures 9,

236: 10, and 12, and an expanded version of Figure 6.  This latter figure,

237: which shows the full run of the velocity dispersion profile, indicates

238: that the D97 model predictions are in good agreement with the

239: moderately rising HST-STIS velocity dispersion profile for M15

240: reported by Gerssen et al. (2002, astro-ph/0209315).  Thus, a central

241: black hole is not required to fit the new STIS velocity measurements,

242: provided that there is a sufficient population of neutron stars and

243: massive white dwarfs.  This conclusion is consistent with the findings

244: of Gerssen et al. (2002, astro-ph/0210158), based on a reapplication

245: of their Jeans equation analysis using the corrected mass-to-light

246: profile (Figure 12) for the D97 models.

247: 

248: