1: %% LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[english,12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6: \usepackage{babel}
7: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
8: \usepackage{graphics}
9:
10: \makeatletter
11:
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
13: \providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
14: %% Special footnote code from the package 'stblftnt.sty'
15: %% Author: Robin Fairbairns -- Last revised Dec 13 1996
16: \let\SF@@footnote\footnote
17: \def\footnote{\ifx\protect\@typeset@protect
18: \expandafter\SF@@footnote
19: \else
20: \expandafter\SF@gobble@opt
21: \fi
22: }
23: \expandafter\def\csname SF@gobble@opt \endcsname{\@ifnextchar[%]
24: \SF@gobble@twobracket
25: \@gobble
26: }
27: \edef\SF@gobble@opt{\noexpand\protect
28: \expandafter\noexpand\csname SF@gobble@opt \endcsname}
29: \def\SF@gobble@twobracket[#1]#2{}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
32: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
33: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
34: \usepackage{babel}
35: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
36: \usepackage{graphics}
37:
38: \makeatletter
39:
40: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
41: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
42: \usepackage{babel}
43: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
44: \usepackage{graphics}
45:
46: \makeatletter
47:
48: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
49: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
50: \usepackage{babel}
51: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
52: \usepackage{graphics}
53:
54: \makeatletter
55:
56: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
57: \usepackage{babel}
58: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
59: \usepackage{graphics}
60:
61: \makeatletter
62:
63: \slugcomment{}
64: \shorttitle{}
65: \shortauthors{}
66:
67: \makeatother
68:
69: \makeatother
70:
71: \makeatother
72:
73: \makeatother
74:
75: \makeatother
76: \begin{document}
77:
78: \title{Discovery of a New Nearby Star}
79:
80:
81: \author{B. J. Teegarden}
82:
83:
84: \affil{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight
85: Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, US}
86:
87:
88: \email{bonnard@lheamail.gsfc.nasa.gov}
89:
90:
91: \author{S. H. Pravdo, M. Hicks, S. B. Shaklan}
92:
93:
94: \affil{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800
95: Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA}
96:
97:
98: \author{K. Covey, O. Fraser, S. L. Hawley}
99:
100:
101: \affil{University of Washington, Dept. of Astronomy, Box 351589, Seattle,
102: WA 98195,USA}
103:
104:
105: \author{T. McGlynn}
106:
107:
108: \affil{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight
109: Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, US}
110:
111: \and{}
112:
113:
114: \author{I. N. Reid}
115:
116:
117: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore,
118: MD 21218, USA}
119:
120: \begin{abstract}
121: We report the discovery of a nearby star with a very large proper
122: motion of \( 5.06\pm 0.03 \) arcsec/yr. The star is called SO025300.5+165258
123: and referred to herein as HPMS (high proper motion star). The discovery
124: came as a result of a search of the SkyMorph database, a sensitive
125: and persistent survey that is well suited for finding stars with high
126: proper motions. There are currently only 7 known stars with proper
127: motions > 5 arcsec/yr. We have determined a preliminary value for
128: the parallax of \( \pi =0.43\pm 0.13 \) arcsec. If this value holds
129: our new star ranks behind only the Alpha Centauri system (including
130: Proxima Centauri) and Barnard's star in the list of our nearest stellar
131: neighbors. The spectrum and measured tangential velocity indicate
132: that HPMS is a main-sequence star with spectral type M6.5. However,
133: if our distance measurement is correct, the HPMS is underluminous
134: by \( 1.2\pm 0.7 \) mag.
135: \end{abstract}
136:
137: \keywords{stars:distances}
138:
139:
140: \section{Introduction}
141:
142: Proper motion surveys have historically revealed a large fraction
143: of our nearest stellar neighbors. The usual method is to search plate
144: pairs typically taken a decade or more apart for relative displacements.
145: However, stars with large proper motions can get lost in the background.
146: The SkyMorph database of NEAT [Near Earth Asteroid Tracking] \citep{ref8} data is
147: ideally suited to search for such objects. NEAT is a NASA-funded project intended to
148: perform a comprehensive survey of near-earth asteroids. Beginning
149: in 1995, several dedicated telescopes have been employed to repeatedly
150: take CCD exposures of the sky mostly in the region within \( \pm 25^{\circ } \)
151: of the celestial equator (excluding galactic latitudes < \( \sim 20^{\circ } \)).
152: The instantaneous fields-of-view have varied over the years with telescope
153: and CCD camera, but generally covered areas of 2-3 deg\( ^{2} \).
154: Our survey, thus far, has included data from May 1996 - Dec 2001 from
155: two 1-m telescopes located on Maui. The total sky coverage is \( \sim 10000 \)
156: deg\( ^{2} \), and within the region of coverage there are typically
157: 20 exposures at any given point. The revisit time ranges from hours
158: to years. With such a large number of exposures over a \( \sim 6 \)
159: yr period, the Skymorph database is an ideal place to search for objects
160: with very large proper motion.~
161:
162:
163: \section{Observations}
164:
165: We have searched the Skymorph database for objects with unfiltered
166: CCD magnitudes in the range 11.0-18.0 having proper motions > 0.25
167: arcsec/yr. Candidate objects were visually confirmed by comparison
168: with Digital Sky Survey images using the overlay feature of the SkyView
169: Program \citep{ref5}. A total of 3154 objects were found of which 63
170: had proper motions > 1.0 arcsec/yr. \( \sim 400 \) of these objects
171: are previously uncatalogued, and a paper on these is in preparation \citep{ref9}.
172: The HPMS had the largest proper motion of all the detected objects:
173: \( 5.06\pm 0.03 \) arcsec/yr. To further refine the HPMS proper motion
174: determination we have included additional observations from the USNO
175: A2.0 Catalogue \citep{ref6} and the 2nd Guide Star Catalogue\citep{ref7}.
176: The measured parameters of our fast-moving star are given in Table
177: 1. We derive from our observations a tangential velocity of \( 52.9\pm 11.7 \)
178: km/s. This is consistent with the velocity dispersion of main sequence
179: red dwarfs of \( \sim 50 \) km/s \citep{ref1}.
180:
181: Figure 1 shows the motion of HPMS across the sky with images from
182: the Palomar Sky Surveys and SkyMorph. The parallax was estimated by fitting the
183: position of HPMS on 43 SkyMorph images (many averaged in sets of three) taken from
184: Julian Dates 2450779-2452498 (November 26, 1997- August 11, 2002) to a reference
185: frame defined by 12 nearby stars in the field. Since the HPMS is quite red, a
186: significant correction for differential chromatic refraction (DCR) was required.
187: The DCR correction was both estimated from first principles and fit
188: to the data taken over one night with varying hour angles. We chose
189: a value for the DCR correction that minimized the scatter in the position
190: on single nights. Figure 2 shows the result of the fit to parallax
191: of the HPMS position with the NOVAS \citep{ref3} model for proper motion
192: and parallax. The result for the parallax is \( 0.43\pm 0.13 \) arcsec. The 1-sigma
193: error is larger than we would like because the camera pixel sizes
194: in the measurements, 1 and 1.4 arcsec, are not ideal for this purpose.
195: More precise observations with cameras designed for this purpose are
196: underway.
197:
198: A spectrum of the HPMS taken on 11 July, 2002 using the Apache Point
199: 2.5 m telescope is shown Figure. 3. For comparison the spectra of the M6.5 V star
200: GJ1111 and the M8 V star VB10 are also shown. The match to GJ1111 is good. We identify
201: the HPMS as a main-sequence dwarf with spectral type M6.5 V based
202: upon detailed examination of the CaH2 (\( \lambda \)7042-7046, \( \lambda \)6814-6846),
203: CaH3 (\( \lambda \)7042-7046, \( \lambda \)6960-6990), and TiO5
204: (\( \lambda \)7042-7046, \( \lambda \)7126-7135) spectral features \citep{ref10}.
205: The relative strengths of the CaH and TiO bands show no evidence that
206: the star is significantly metal-poor.
207:
208: The HPMS was observed photometrically on the night of 7 August, 2002
209: at the JPL Table Mountain Observatory 0.6-meter telescope using broad
210: band UBVRI Bessel filters and the facility CCD imaging system. Multiple
211: UBVRI exposures of 15 Landolt (1992) stars ranging in color and air
212: mass were also measured. With this data both linear and color-corrected
213: extinction curves for each filter were computed. The nominal extinction
214: coefficients and small (\( \sim 1 \) mMag) color coefficients indicated
215: a good photometric night. The color-corrected extinction curves were
216: used to compute the measured magnitudes listed in Table 1.
217:
218: The HPMS is also in the soon-to-be-released 2MASS all-sky point source
219: catalog [2MASS J02530084+1652532] \citep{ref4}, with magnitudes of
220: J = \( 8.39\pm 0.03 \), H = \( 7.88\pm 0.04 \) and K\( _{s} \)
221: = \( 7.59\pm 0.05 \). The photometric measurements are summarized
222: in Table 1. Combining these data with the trigonometric parallax given
223: above allows estimation of the absolute magnitude. Despite the strong
224: spectroscopic similarity to GJ 1111, the derived values are significantly
225: fainter. For example, we derive M$_J$= \( 11.58\pm 0.35 \) for the HPMS,
226: as compared with M$_J$ = \( 10.40\pm 0.03 \) for GJ 1111. If our trigonometric
227: parallax is accurate, then the HPMS is underluminous relative to a
228: normal M6.5 disk dwarf by \( 1.2\pm 0.7 \) magnitudes. This result
229: might be expected for an extreme metal-poor subdwarf, such as LHS
230: 1826 \citep{ref12}, but, as noted above, there
231: is no indication that HPMS is metal-poor. If the star has the same effective
232: temperature as GJ 1111, then the low luminosity implies that the HPMS has a radius
233: only 60\% that of GJ 1111, or \( \sim 0.68 \) R\( _{Jupiter} \), violating
234: electron degeneracy.
235:
236: Given these results, we have estimated a spectrophotometric parallax
237: for the HPMS. \citet{ref11} have shown that spectral type is well
238: correlated with MJ for ultra-cool dwarfs. Using their linear relation,
239: we derive MJ= \( 10.59\pm 0.25 \), corresponding to a distance of
240: \( 3.6\pm 0.4 \) parsecs. At this distance, which is almost identical
241: to that of GJ 1111, HPMS is the 17th nearest system (and 27th nearest
242: star) to the Sun.
243:
244:
245: \section{Conclusions}
246:
247: Table 2 summarizes the properties of the 10 nearest known stars including
248: distances and proper motions. Given our parallax value, the HPMS ranks
249: 3rd in distance among stellar systems (or 5th among individual objects)
250: and 8th in proper motion. (We emphasize again that the parallax value
251: is preliminary and that the distance ranking could change.). In the
252: visual band it is the faintest star in the list, which is part of
253: the reason it was not discovered in previous surveys. Since the NEAT
254: survey has only covered the region \( \pm 25^{\circ } \) in declination
255: it is entirely possible that other faint nearby objects remain to
256: be discovered.
257:
258: \acknowledgements{}
259:
260: We thank D. Kirkpatrick for his reduction of the HPMS 2MASS data.
261: We also thank N. Zacharias, S. Levine, and C. Dahn for useful discussions.
262: This research was performed in part by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
263: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National
264: Aeronautics and Space Administration. The results presented in this
265: paper are based in part on data obtained using the NASA-JPL camera
266: at the Oschin Telescope, Palomar Observatory, California Institute
267: of Technology. This publication makes use of data products from the
268: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University
269: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
270: Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
271: Administration and the National Science Foundation. SkyMorph is funded
272: by NASA's Applied Information Systems Program.
273:
274: \begin{thebibliography}{}
275: \bibitem[Binney and Merrifield (1991)]{ref1}Binney, J. and Merrifield, M. 1998,
276: \emph{Galactic Astronomy}, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press), p. 627.
277: \bibitem[Dahn, et al. (2002)]{ref11}Dahn, Conrad C., et al.,\aj, 124, 1170.
278: \bibitem[Gizis and Reid (1997)]{ref12}Gizis, J. E. and Reid, I. N. 1997, \pasp,
279: 109, 849.
280: \bibitem[Gleiss and Jahreiss (1991)]{ref2}Gliese, W. and Jahreiss, H. 1991,
281: \emph{Preliminary Version of the
282: Third Catalog of Nearby Stars,} (Heidelberg: Astron. Rechen-Institut).~
283: \bibitem[Kaplan et al. (1989)]{ref3}Kaplan, G. H., Hughes, J. A.,
284: Seidelmann, P. K., Smith, C. A. and Yallop, B. D. 1989, \aj, 97, 1197.
285: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick (2002)]{ref4}Kirkpatrick, D. 2002, private communication.
286: \bibitem[McGlynn, Scollick and White (1996)]{ref5}McGlynn, T., Scollick, K.,
287: White, N 1996, \emph{New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys,} IAU
288: Symposium No. 179, (Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers), 465.
289: \bibitem[Monet (1998)]{ref6}Monet, D. G. 1998, \baas, 193, 12003.
290: \bibitem[Morrison and McLean (2001)]{ref7}Morrison, J.E. and McLean, G. 2001, AAS
291: DDA meeting \#32, \#06.03.
292: \bibitem[Pravdo et al. (1999)]{ref8}Pravdo, S. H., et al. 1999, \aj , 117, 1616.
293: \bibitem[Pravdo (2003)]{ref9}Pravdo, S. H. 2003, in preparation.
294: \bibitem[Reid, Hawley and Gizis (1995)]{ref10}Reid, I. N., Hawley, S.L., \&
295: Gizis, J. E. 1995, \aj, 110, 1838. \end{thebibliography}
296:
297: \clearpage
298:
299: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
300: \tablenum{1}
301: \tablecaption{HPMS Parameters}
302: \startdata
303: RA (J2000)\tablenotemark{a} &42.24369\( ^{\circ } \)\\
304: DEC (J2000)\tablenotemark{a} &16.89200\( ^{\circ } \)\\
305: Epoch\tablenotemark{a} &1989.84\\
306: Magnitudes (B,V, R, I, J, H, K\( _{s} \))\tablenotemark{b}&
307: 17.21\( \pm \) 0.11, 15.40 \( \pm \) 0.08, 13.26 \( \pm \)
308: .06, 10.66 \( \pm \) 0.03,\\
309: &8.39 \( \pm \) 0.03, 7.88 \( \pm \) 0.04, 7.59 \( \pm \) 0.05\\
310: Spectral Type &M6.5 V\\
311: Proper Motion &5.06 \( \pm \) 0.03 arcsec/yr\\
312: Position Angle &138.1 \( \pm \) 0.3\( ^{\circ } \)\\
313: Parallax (\( \pi \)) &0.43 \( \pm \) 0.13 arcsec\\
314: Distance (1/\( \pi \)) &2.3 (+1.0,-0.5) pc\\
315: Tangential Velocity &52.9 \( \pm \) 11.7 km/s\\
316: \enddata
317:
318: \tablenotetext{a}{From 2nd Guide Star Catalogue}
319: \tablenotetext{b}{B,V,R,I are from this work. J, H, K$_{s}$ are from the 2MASS
320: Catalogue.}
321:
322: \end{deluxetable}
323:
324:
325: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
326: \tablenum{2}
327: \tablecaption{Nearest Known Stars\tablenotemark{a}}
328: \tablehead{
329: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{D(pc)} & \colhead{PM\tablenotemark{b} (arcsec/yr)}
330: & \colhead{M(V)\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Sp. Type}}
331: \startdata
332: Proxima Centauri &1.30 &3.81 &15.49 &dM5 e\\
333: Alpha Centauri A &1.34 &3.69 &4.38 &G2 V\\
334: Alpha Centauri B &1.34 &3.69 &5.71 &K0 V\\
335: Barnards Star &1.83 &10.31 &13.23 &M5 V\\
336: \emph{HPMS (this work)} &2.3 (+1.0,-0.5) &$5.06\pm0.03$ &$18.5\pm0.7$ &M6.5 V\\
337: Wolf 359 &2.39 &4.70 &16.56 &M6\\
338: Gl 411 &2.52 &4.81 &10.48 &M2 Ve\\
339: Luyten 726-8 A &2.63 &3.37 &15.47 &dM5.5e\\
340: Luyten 726-8 B (UV Ceti) &2.63 &3.37 &15.60 &dM5.5e\\
341: Sirius A &2.63 &1.33 &1.47 &A1 V\\
342: Sirius B &2.63 &1.33 &11.34 &DA2\\
343: \enddata
344:
345: \tablenotetext{a}{All values in this table (with the exception of the HPMS) were
346: either taken directly or derived from the Preliminary Version of the Third Catalogue
347: of Nearby Stars.{ref2}}
348: \tablenotetext{b}{Proper motion.}
349: \tablenotetext{c}{Absolute visual magnitude.}
350:
351: \end{deluxetable}
352:
353: \figcaption{Images from the Palomar Sky Surveys and SkyMorph (lower panels)
354: show the motion of HPMS south and east across the sky from 1951 until the
355: current epoch.}
356:
357: \figcaption{The fit to the parallax of HPMS results in a value of
358: 0.43 \protect\protect\( \pm \protect \protect \)
359: 0.13 arcsec. The errors per measurement that produce the good fit
360: shown are 0.28 arcsec. The contribution to this error from photon-counting
361: statistics is \protect\protect\( \sim \protect \protect \)0.1 arcsec.
362: The remainder is due to uncalibrated DCR or other unknown systematic
363: errors.}
364:
365: \figcaption{The spectrum of HPMS compared with two standard stars. Based upon
366: thiscomparision and detailed analysis of spectral features HPMS is a main
367: sequence
368: dwarf with spectral type M6.5.}
369:
370: \end{document}
371: