1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}

2: \def\src {RX\,J0806.3+1527}

3: \markboth{Israel et al. }{Unveiling the nature of \src}

4: \pagestyle{myheadings}

5: \nofiles

6: 

7: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.

8: 

9: \def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}

10: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}

11: \let\prog=\arg

12: 

13: %\def\src {RX\,J0806.3+1527}

14: \def\srcm {RX\,J1914.4+2456}

15: \newcommand{\srchri}{1BMW J080622.8+152732}

16: \newcommand{\srcrass}{1RXS J080623.6+152729}

17: \newcommand{\VLT}{{\em VLT--UT2} }

18: \newcommand{\AXAF}{{\em Chandra}}

19: \newcommand{\R}{{\em ROSAT}}

20: \newcommand{\A}{{\em ASCA}}

21: \newcommand{\EXO}{{\em EXOSAT}}

22: \newcommand{\e}{{\em Einstein}}

23: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\em XMM--Newton}}

24: \newcommand{\BSAX}{{\em Beppo}SAX} 

25: \newcommand{\RXTE}{{\em R}XTE}

26: 

27: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}

28: \marginparwidth 1.25in

29: \marginparsep .125in

30: \marginparpush .25in

31: \reversemarginpar

32: 

33: \begin{document}

34: \title{Unveiling the nature of the 321s Orbital Period X--ray source \src}

35:  \author{GianLuca Israel, Luigi Stella}

36: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, Monteporzio Catone, Italy}

37: \author{Stefano Covino, Sergio Campana}

38: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Bianchi 46, Merate, Italy}

39: \author{Gianni Marconi}

40: \affil{European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile}

41: \author{Christopher W. Mauche}

42: \affil{Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, USA}

43: \author{Sandro Mereghetti}

44: \affil{Istituto di Fisica Cosmica G. Occhialini, CNR, Via Bassini 15, Milano, Italy}

45: \author{Ignacio Negueruela}

46: \affil{Dpto. de F\'{\i}sica, Ingenier\'{\i}a de Sistemas y 

47: Teor\'{\i}a de la Se\~{n}ales, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. de Correos 99, Alicante, Spain}

48: 

49: 

50: \begin{abstract}

51: A nearly simultaneous X-ray/optical (\AXAF\ and VLT) observational

52: campaign of \src\ has been carried out during 2001.  These

53: observations allowed us to phase the X--ray and optical light curves

54: for the first time. We measured a phase--shift of $\sim$0.5, in good

55: agreement with the presence of two distinct emission regions and with

56: the X--ray irradiation process predictions. The \AXAF\ data allowed us

57: also to study in details the X-ray spectrum of \src, which is

58: consistent with a soft (kT$<$70\,eV) and small (R$_{BB}<$20\,km)

59: blackbody component.  We discuss the present findings on the light

60: of the models proposed so far to account for the X--ray emission

61: detected from \src, and its twin source \srcm.

62: \end{abstract}

63: 

64: \section{Introduction}

65: \src\ was discovered in 1990 by the \R\ satellite during the All

66: Sky Survey (RASS; Beuermann et al. 1999). However, it was only in 1999

67: that a periodic signal at 321\,s was detected with \R\ HRI in its soft

68: X--ray flux (Israel et al. 1999, hereafter I99; the discovery of

69: X--ray pulsations were also reported independently by Burwitz \&

70: Reinsch 2001).  Based on the large pulsed fraction ($\sim$100\%),

71: relatively low 0.5--2.0 keV flux (3.0--5.0\,$\times$\,10$^{-12}$ erg

72: cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$), modest distance (edge of the Galaxy is at

73: $\leq$1\,kpc in the direction of the source) and presence of a faint

74: (B=20.7) blue object in the Digitized Sky Survey 1.5'' away from the

75: nominal X--ray position, the source was tentatively classified as a

76: cataclysmic variable of the intermediate polar class (I99).

77: 

78: Subsequent deeper optical studies carried out during 1999-2001 both at

79: the Very Large Telescope (VLT; Cerro Paranal) and at the Telescopio

80: Nazionale Galileo (TNG; La Palma) allowed us to unambiguously identify

81: the optical counterpart of \src, a blue V=21.1 (B=20.7) star

82: consistent with that proposed by I99 and Burwitz \& Reinsch (2001),

83: and with no significant proper motion (Israel et al. 2002a, Israel et

84: al. 2002b, hereafter I02). B, V and R time--resolved photometry

85: revealed the presence of $\sim$15\% pulsations at the $\sim$321\,s

86: X--ray period (Israel et al. 2002a; I02). Independently, the discovery

87: of the optical counterpart was reported by Ramsay et al. (2002) ten

88: days later based on photometric observations carried out at the Nordic

89: Telescope (NOT; La Palma).

90: 

91: However, one of the most important piece of information was obtained

92: based on medium--resolution spectroscopy (VLT) of this faint object

93: and reported in I02.  The spectral study revealed a blue continuum

94: with no intrinsic absorption lines. Broad ($FWHM$$\sim$1500

95: km\,s$^{-1}$), low equivalent width (EW$\sim -2\div-6$\AA) emission

96: lines from the HeII Pickering series (plus additional emission lines

97: likely associated with HeI, CIII, NIII, etc.) were instead

98: detected. These findings, together with the period stability and

99: absence of any additional modulation in the 1\,min$ - $5\,hr period

100: range, are interpreted in terms of a double degenerate He--rich binary

101: (similar to the AM CVn class) with an orbital period of 321\,s, the

102: shortest ever recorded (I02; see also Ramsay et al. 2002).

103: \begin{figure}

104: \plotone{ef1_nobc.eps}

105: %\plottwo{}{}

106: \caption{\AXAF\ ACIS--S folded light curve (nearly 100\% pulsed

107: fraction; eclipse is evident at phases 0.0-0.3), with superposed the

108: VLT optical one (R band). Optical and X--ray peaks are phase--shifted

109: of about 0.5.}

110: \end{figure}

111: 

112: \section{Models}

113: The nature of the X--ray emission detected from \src\ and its twin

114: source \srcm\ is still under debate.  A number of models have been

115: proposed in the last years (for details see Cropper et al. in

116: these proceedings). Among these is the double degenerate binary system

117: with mass transfer model which has been proposed in two flavors: with

118: a weakly magnetic primary (Polar--like; Cropper et al. 1998) and with

119: a non--magnetic accretor (Algol--like, also known as direct impact

120: accretion model; Marsh \& Steeghs 2002).  An additional model involves

121: a secondary star which does not fill its Roche lobe and crossing 

122: the magnetic field of the primary produces an induced electric field

123: (Wu et al 2002).  Finally, the possibility that \src\ and \srcm\ are

124: stream--fed intermediate polars (IP) seen face--on has been recently

125: proposed under the hypothesis that the even terms of the HeII

126: Pickering series might be partially due to the presence of H. In the

127: IP scenario the 321\,s pulsation would represents the spin period of

128: the accreting white dwarf (Norton et al. 2002).

129: 

130: The lack of good quality (and statistics) X--ray spectra has been the

131: most important limiting factor in the study and understanding of the

132: nature of this source. Moreover, the study of the possible presence of

133: delays of the minima and/or maxima in the pulse shapes between the

134: X--ray and the optical band is important for understanding the

135: emission geometry from \src. Therefore, the optical observations of

136: \src\ we requested and carried out in parallel with the X-ray \AXAF\

137: pointing offered us a nice opportunity to shed light on the puzzling

138: nature of this object.

139: 

140: 

141: 

142: \section{Optical/X--ray observational campaign}

143: On 11 November 2001 a 20\,ks \AXAF\ ACIS--S observation was carried

144: out as part of the AO3. At the same time we requested a 3\,hr long

145: Discretionary Director Time (DDT) optical observations at the 8.2\,m

146: VLT--U4 Yepun (the name of Venus in the old Mapuche language),

147: partially overlapping in time the \AXAF\ data. The data were reduced

148: with standard tools both for X--ray (CIAO package) and optical

149: observations (MIDAS and IRAF). We used the \AXAF\ observation (longer

150: and with higher statistics than the VLT one) to rely upon an accurate

151: value of the 321\,s modulation.  This is 321.51$\pm$0.03\,s (90\%

152: confidence level). Then, the optical and X--ray light curves were

153: folded at this period and the result is shown in Figure 1. A $\sim$0.5

154: phase--shift between the optical and X--ray peak emission is evident,

155: in good agreement with the predictions of the X--ray

156: irradiation. Specifically, we note that the minimum of the optical and

157: the maximum of the X--ray are at the same phase. The pulsed fraction

158: of the 321\,s modulation is 100\% and 14\% in the X--ray and optical

159: bands, respectively (consistent with results reported by I99, I02 and

160: Ramsay et al. 2002).

161: \begin{figure}

162: \plotone{specAXAF.eps}

163: %\plottwo{}{}

164: \caption{The \AXAF\ ACIS--S 20\,ks phase--averaged spectrum of \src\

165: fitted with a simple blackbody model. Residuals (lower panel) are

166: obtained for the 'raw' blackbody model (crosses) and taking into

167: account the pile--up (circled crosses).}

168: \end{figure}

169: 

170: The X--ray data were also used to perform a detailed spectral analysis

171: and below we report some preliminary results.  In particular, we

172: checked the double degenerate model predictions, where a hot spot (a

173: soft blackbody as a first approximation) is thought to be formed at the

174: polar caps or at the equator of the primary star: this would be

175: responsible for the irradiation of part of the companion star and of

176: the accretion stream (if any).  A first attempt in fitting the data

177: with a simple blackbody model resulted in the possible presence of a

178: high energy tail (above $\sim$2\,keV; crosses in the lower panel of

179: Figure 2). However, an inspection of the \AXAF\ light curve count rate

180: is consistent with the source being piled--up in the phase interval

181: 0.35--0.85 of Figure 1.  Pile--up is inherently a nonlinear process

182: occurring in single photon counting CCD cameras. Hence, corrections

183: are not easy to be taken fully into account, and a parametrization of

184: the effects must be considered (Davis 2001).

185:  

186: With this in mind, we performed a pulse phase spectroscopic (PPS)

187: analysis adding to the blackbody component an ad hoc model (developped at

188: the Chandra Science Data Center) for the pile--up. The results of this

189: study are reported in Figure\,3 and can be summarised as follows: the

190: migration grade parameter $\alpha$ is extremely variable and confirmed

191: that the pile--up plays an increasingly important role as the X--ray

192: emission approaches the peak of the modulation, where 90\% of the

193: photons are affected. It is also worth noting that the size of the

194: corresponding blackbody is in the 10--20\,km range (assuming a

195: distance of 500\,pc), corresponding to an extremely small surface

196: fraction of a white dwarf. Moreover, the unabsorbed 0.1--2.5\,keV flux

197: during the pulse--on of \src\ is $\sim$3$\times$10$^{-10}$\,erg

198: cm$^{-2}$ $s^{-1}$ corresponding to a maximum luminosity of less than

199: 10$^{35}$ erg $s^{-1}$ (assuming a maximum distance of 1\,kpc). There

200: is a factor of more than 10$^4$ between the on-- and off--pulse

201: fluxes.

202: \begin{figure}

203: \plotone{pps.eps}

204: %\plottwo{}{}

205: \caption{The results of the PPS analysis are reported for a number of

206: spectral parameters: absorption, blackbody temperature, blackbody

207: radius, photon migration grade fraction, and absorbed (triangles) and

208: unabsorbed (asterisks) flux. Superposed is the folded light curve.}

209: \end{figure}

210: 

211: Based on the above results we fitted the phase--averaged spectrum with

212: weighted PPS parameters. We obtained a satisfactory $\chi^{2}_{\nu}$

213: of 1.02 for 32 degree of freedom (see Figure 2 and the circled crosses

214: in the lower panel) for a blackbody with kT$\sim$65\,eV, and

215: absorption of $\sim$4$\times$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.  Similar results,

216: although with larger uncertainties, where obtained for an annular

217: region around the position of the source, where the pile--up is

218: negligible.

219: 

220: We also performed a radial profile study of \src\ thanks to the

221: spatial resolution offered by \AXAF: this was found to be in good

222: agreement with the expected point spread function.

223: 

224: 

225: \begin{figure}

226: \plotone{comp.eps}

227: %\plottwo{}{}

228: \caption{\A\ and \AXAF\ spectral comparison between \src\ and \srcm,

229: and a number of IPs. See the text for more details.}

230: \end{figure}

231: 

232: \section{Discussion and forthcoming observations}

233: 

234: The nearly--simultaneous optical and X--ray observations of \src\

235: carried out during 2001 allowed us have a closer look at this source.

236: The following preliminary implications can be reported.

237: 

238: (i) The nearly half pulse phase-shift between the two datasets is a

239: clear signature of the fact that the optical and X--ray photons come

240: from two different regions. This behavior is often observed in binary

241: systems where X--ray irradiation occurs. It is also worth noting that

242: the same level of phase--shift was measured for the twin source \srcm\

243: (Ramsay et al. 2000; this is also true for the shape of the X--ray and

244: optical modulations). In the Algol--like model this is easily

245: explained in terms of an elongated equatorial X--ray emitting region

246: self--eclipsed by the accreting white dwarf. In the Polar--like and

247: unipolar inductor models the X--ray emitting region is at the polar

248: cap(s) of the accretor. In both cases a 40-50\% of phase--shift is

249: expected.

250: 

251: (ii) The inferred size of the blackbody component is $\sim$20\,km, a

252: factor of about 10 lower than expected in the case of the electric

253: star model (Wu et al. 2002), and measured in IPs. However, we note

254: that the predicted radius in the unipolar inductor model depends on

255: a number of parameters; a more accurate prediction will be likely

256: available soon.

257: 

258: (iii) In order to check the IP scenario we compared the spectral

259: X--ray emissions of \src\ and \srcm\ with a number of IP which are

260: thought to be stream--fed or at least related to (FO Aqr, V2400 Oph

261: and PQ Gem). Figure 4 shows the result of the analysis: all the data

262: are taken from the \A\ database but \src\ (for which we used the

263: \AXAF\ data; note that due to the different energy responses of \A\

264: and \AXAF, only the 0.7--5\,keV energy interval can be compared). It

265: is evident how the \src\ and \srcm\ spectra stand out. It is difficult

266: to reconcile such a difference only to a different viewing angle.

267: 

268: (iv) Regardless the nature of \src\ the number of similarities shared

269: with \srcm\ is so large that we are necessarily forced in considering

270: them as members of the same class (currently made up of two objects).

271: 

272: Finally, within one year we will rely upon new observations which will

273: allow us to likely distinguish among the proposed scenarios.

274: Specifically, we will be able to detect any period derivative larger

275: than about 10$^{-5}$ s yr$^{-1}$. On longer time--scales the LISA

276: mission will search for gravitational waves from \src, the strain

277: amplitude of which are among the highest expected from known binary

278: sources (see Phinney et al. these proceedings).

279: 

280: 

281: 

282: 

283: \section{Acknowledgements}

284: 

285: GianLuca Israel is deeply grateful to Paul Plucinsky of the Chandra Team and to 

286: Guenther Hasinger, Piero Rosati, Roberto Gilmozzi and Martino Romaniello 

287: for their help in the planning end execution of the observations. 

288: 

289: 

290: \begin{references}

291: \reference Beuermann, K., Thomas, H.-C., Reinsch, K., Schwope, A. D.,

292: Tr\"{u}mper, J, Voges, W., 1999, A\&A, 347, 47

293: \reference Burwitz. V., Reinsch, K. 2001, {\it X-ray astronomy : stellar

294: endpoints, AGN, and the diffuse X-ray background}, Bologna, Italy, eds White,

295: N. E., Malaguti, G., Palumbo, G., AIP conference proceedings, 599, 522

296: %\reference Burwitz, V., Haberl, F., Neuhaeuser, R., Predehl, P., Tr\"{u}mper,

297: %J., Zavlin, V. E. 2002, A\&A, in press, astro-ph/0211536

298: %\reference Clarke, J. T. et al, 1996, Science, 274, 404

299: \reference Cropper, M., Harrop-Allin, M. K., Mason, K. O., Mittaz, J. P. D.,

300: Potter, S. B., Ramsay, G., 1998, MNRAS, 293, L57

301: %\reference Duck, S. R., Rosen, S. R., Ponman, T. J., Norton, A. J., Watson,

302: %M. G., Mason, K. O. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 372

303: \reference Davis, J.E.\ 2001, ApJ, 562, 575 

304: \reference Israel G.L., Panzera M.R., Campana S., Lazzati D., Covino S.,

305: Tagliaferri G. 1999, A\&A, 349, L1

306: \reference Israel, G.L., Stella, L., Hummel, W., Covino, S., \& Campana, S.\ 2002a, 

307: IAU Circ., 7835

308: \reference Israel, G.L., Hummel, W., Covino, S., Campana, S., Appenzeller, I.,

309: G\"{a}ssler, W., Mantel, K.-H., Marconi, G., Mauche, C. W., Munari, U.,

310: Negueruela, I., Nicklas, H., Rupprecht, G., Smart, R. L., Stahl, O.,

311: Stella, L. 2002b, A\&A, 386, L13 (I02)

312: %\reference Kondo, M., Noguchi, T., Maehara, H. 1984, {\it Ann. Tokyo

313: %Astron. Obs.}, 20, 130

314: %\reference Li, J., Ferrario, L., Wickramasinghe, D. T., 1998, ApJ, 503, L151

315: \reference Marsh, T., Steeghs, D. 2002, MNRAS, 331, L7

316: %\reference Motch, C., Haberl, F. 1995, {\it Cape Workshop on Magnetic

317: %Cataclysmic Variables}, ASP Conf. Ser. 85, eds Buckley, D. A. H., Warner, B., p

318: %109

319: %\reference Motch, C., Haberl, F., Guillout, P., Pakull, M., Reinsch, K.,

320: %Krautter, J. 1996, A\&A, 307, 459

321: \reference Norton, A. J., Haswell, C. A., Wynn, G. A. 2002, astro-ph/0206013

322: \reference Ramsay, G., Cropper, M., Wu, K., Mason, K. O., Hakala, P. 2000,

323: MNRAS, 311, 75

324: \reference Ramsay, G., Hakala, P., Cropper, M. 2002a, MNRAS, 332, L7

325: %\reference Ramsay, G., Wu, K., Cropper, M., Schmidt, G., Sekiguchi, K.,

326: %Iwamuro, F., Maihara, T., 2002b, MNRAS, 333, 575

327: %\reference Rappaport, S., Joss, P. C., Webbink, R. F. 1982, ApJ, 254, 616

328: %\reference Smak, J., 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 255

329: %\reference Strohmayer, T., 2002, ApJ, 581, 577

330: %\reference Warner, B., 1995, Ap\&SS, 225, 249

331: %\reference Warner, B., Woudt, P. A. 2002, PASP, 792, 129

332: %\reference Wegner, G., McMahon, R. K., Boley, F. I., 1987, AJ, 94, 1271

333: \reference Wu, K., Cropper, M., Ramsay, G., Sekiguchi, K. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 221

334: \end{references}

335: 

336: 

337: \end{document}

338: