1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Volatile-Rich Planets}
4: \shortauthors{Kuchner}
5:
6: \received{2003 March 9}
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ letters October 10, 2003}
10:
11: \title{Volatile-Rich Earth-Mass Planets in the Habitable Zone}
12:
13: \author{Marc J. Kuchner\altaffilmark{1}}
14:
15: %\email{mkuchner@cfa.harvard.edu}
16:
17:
18: %\affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
19: %60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
20:
21: \altaffiltext{1}{Michelson Postdoctoral Fellow,
22: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
23: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, mkuchner@cfa.harvard.edu}
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27:
28: A small planet is not necessarily a terrestrial planet.
29: Planets that form beyond the snow line
30: with too little mass to seed
31: rapid gas accretion ($\lesssim 10$~$M_{\bigoplus}$) should
32: be rich in volatile ices like H${}_{2}$O and NH${}_3$.
33: Some of these planets should migrate inward by interacting
34: with a circumstellar disk or with other planets.
35: Such objects can retain their volatiles for billions
36: of years or longer at $\sim 1$ AU as their thick steam atmospheres undergo
37: slow hydrodynamic escape. These objects could
38: appear in future surveys for extrasolar Earth analogs.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41: \keywords{astrobiology --- planetary systems}
42:
43:
44: %\keywords{astrobiology --- Earth --- minor planets, asteroids ---
45: %planetary systems --- Sun: UV radiation}
46:
47:
48: \section{INTRODUCTION}
49:
50: Several upcoming space
51: missions\footnote{See \url{http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov}}
52: aim to detect extrasolar planets
53: with masses of order 1~$M_{\bigoplus}$.
54: The Space Interferometry Mission (SIM) should be able to
55: detect extrasolar planets down to $\sim 3$ $M_{\bigoplus}$
56: astrometrically by observing the reflex orbital motions of their host stars
57: \citep{ford03}.
58: The Kepler and COROT missions are designed to photometrically detect planets
59: with the same radius as the Earth by observing
60: the dimming of their host stars during planetary transits.
61: Eventually, missions like the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF)
62: and Darwin should directly detect extrasolar planets around nearby stars
63: and take their spectra, searching for planets as faint as
64: the Earth in either reflected light \citep{kuch03} or thermal emission \citep{wool03}.
65:
66: Earth-mass planets offer particular biological interest if they
67: orbit in the habitable zone,
68: the range of circumstellar radii
69: where stable liquid water can exist on the surface of a planet
70: that is in thermal equilibrium with stellar radiation
71: \citep{huan59,kast93}. In the solar system, this
72: zone covers roughly the region between the orbits of
73: Venus (0.72~AU) and Mars (1.52~AU).
74: Natural places to look for life-bearing extrasolar planets
75: are the habitable zones of nearby stars.
76:
77: Discussions of extrasolar planets often
78: quietly assume that any object with mass
79: $\sim 1 M_{\bigoplus}$ orbiting in a star's habitable
80: zone will be terrestrial, i.e, composed mostly of
81: silicates and iron-peak elements---like the Earth.
82: However, we suggest that the habitable zones of nearby stars could
83: harbor other similar-looking beasts. Planets composed
84: substantially of volatiles
85: can conceivably form with masses up to $\sim 10 M_{\bigoplus}$ and
86: migrate inward to the habitable zone.
87: We estimate that Earth-sized volatile-rich planets can retain their volatiles
88: for billions of years at $\sim 1$~AU,
89: protected by thick atmospheres that slowly undergo hydrodynamic escape.
90:
91:
92: \section{FORMATION AND MIGRATION}
93:
94: The snow line in a protoplanetary disk \citep{haya81}
95: occurs where the temperature of the nebular gas
96: drops below the sublimation temperature for water
97: (170~K in a vacuum).
98: In popular planet-formation scenarios \citep[e.g.][]{poll96,wuch00},
99: planets form much faster beyond the snow line than in the
100: warmer center of the disk because outside the snow line,
101: frozen volatiles provide more
102: solid building material. Protoplanets beyond the
103: snow line more massive than a threshold mass roughly equal to the presumed
104: core masses of Jupiter and Saturn rapidly
105: accrete gas, becoming gas giants
106: \citep[but see also][]{boss02}.
107: Protoplanets beyond the snow line less massive than this threshold grow slowly,
108: and when the gaseous disk has dispersed they remain
109: small balls of ice and rock, like Pluto and the icy moons
110: of the outer planets.
111:
112: Icy planets and moons that form near the snow line should
113: contain mostly H${}_{2}$O and silicates. Those that form farther out can
114: acquire NH${}_3$ and CH${}_4$ as hydrates,
115: together with CO, N${}_2$, and CO${}_2$. Beyond the snow line,
116: the solar nebula does not have time to reach
117: chemical equilibrium, making it hard to predict the
118: relative ratios of these compounds \citep{prin93}.
119: Icy bodies more massive than $\sim 0.02$~$M_{\bigoplus}$ form with
120: enough accretional energy that they begin life with their ice mostly
121: melted \citep{luni82, stev86}.
122: These objects must freeze again in the outer solar system,
123: though the details of this process remain uncertain.
124:
125: Jupiter's moon Ganymede has a mass of only
126: 0.02~$M_{\bigoplus}$, but it makes a good reference point \citep{sohl02}.
127: Ganymede has a diameter larger than that of Mercury (0.06~$M_{\bigoplus}$);
128: its mean density suggests that it is roughly 60\% silicate rock and metal
129: and 40\% volatiles.
130: Water ice appears to cover most of Ganymede's surface; this
131: ice may top an ocean maintained by radiogenic heating \citep{spoh03}.
132: Objects even richer in water could possibly form near the snow line, where
133: water may collect due to diffusion in the
134: solar nebula \citep{stev88}.
135:
136: Interaction with a circumstellar disk can cause
137: protoplanets to migrate inward from the snow line \citep{gold80,lin96}.
138: Ice planets could form with masses up to the threshold for rapid gas accretion
139: ($\sim 10 M_{\bigoplus}$); low mass objects in this category
140: undergo ``type I'' migration in a massive protoplanetary disk, which appears
141: to occur on timescales of $10^{5} (M/M_{\bigoplus})^{-1}$ years,
142: where $M$ is the mass of the planet \citep{ward97}.
143: If the volatile-rich planet migrates after the $\sim 10^7$~year period of
144: terrestrial planet formation at $\sim 1$~AU, it has a better
145: chance of surviving near the star. Even after
146: the outer protoplanetary disk has dissipated, interaction with other protoplanets
147: can scatter an icy body into an orbit with small pericenter \citep{rasi96,adam03},
148: where further encounters, stellar tides \citep{mayo95} or disk tides \citep{ward88} can
149: circularize its orbit. Scattered Earth-mass planetesimals in
150: the outer solar system may have generated the obliquity of Uranus and Neptune \citep{ster91}
151: and the high inclination Kuiper Belt objects \citep{peti99}.
152:
153: A volatile planet may not even need to migrate to get to the
154: habitable zone.
155: Recent models of flared disks
156: around young stars suggest that the snow line could be as close-in as
157: 1~AU in a disk around a solar-mass star \citep{sass00}.
158: Asteroids orbiting between 2.6 and 3.5 AU (most C-type asteroids)
159: contain minerals that appear to have undergone aqueous alteration,
160: suggesting that they contained water ice when they formed
161: \citep[see the review by][]{baru95}.
162: A snowline located closer-in than 2.6 AU
163: would naturally explain the existence of
164: icy primitive asteroids.
165:
166: %Common sense suggests that a ball of ice will not last long as close
167: %to a star as the Earth. But the energy needed to remove the volatiles from
168: %the planet must arrive through an atmosphere, which makes the
169: %situation more complicated than common sense can guess.
170: %We will investigate what happens to an icy planet in the inner
171: %solar system using a simple two-layer model related to the two-layer
172: %model \citet{chia97} used to model passive accretion disks.
173:
174:
175: \section{VAPORIZATION: A SELF-LIMITING PROCESS}
176:
177: A water planet arriving at $\sim 1$~AU should quickly develop a
178: steam atmosphere of 100 bars or more, like the atmosphere of the accreting Earth \citep{abe85}.
179: Such an atmosphere can easily become a runaway greenhouse when accretional impacts
180: deliver an energy flux $\gtrsim$ the solar constant to its base.
181: But in the absence of such an energy source, the two-stream model of
182: \citet{mats86} suggests that a steam atmosphere of $\gtrsim 30$~bars
183: simply provides stable greenhouse heating up to a temperature of
184: \begin{equation}
185: T_{G}=\left({\lambda+\sqrt{1-\omega}} \over {1+\sqrt{1-\omega}} \right)^{1/4} T_{BB}
186: \approx \lambda^{1/4} T_{BB},
187: \end{equation}
188: at its base, where $\lambda$ is the ratio of the opacity at thermal wavelengths to the opacity
189: at short wavelengths,
190: $\omega$ is the albedo for single-scattering at short wavelengths, and
191: $T_{BB}$ is the local blackbody temperature;
192: $T_{BB}= 278 \ K \ (a/{\rm 1~AU})^{-1/2} (L_{*}/L_{\odot})^{1/4}$, where
193: $a$ is the radius of the planet's orbit, and $L_{*}$ is the luminosity of the star.
194: Since $\lambda$ is likely to be in the
195: range of 10--100 ($\lambda \approx 31$ for Venus), and $\omega$ is likely to be
196: almost 1, $T_{G} \approx 2.4 T_{BB}$.
197:
198: When $T_{G} < 647$~K,
199: the critical temperature of water, water simply condenses out of a steam atmosphere
200: that is in equilibrium with stellar radiation, leaving a hot ocean on the planet's surface
201: \citep{mats86, zahn88}.
202: In this situation, the planet's vaporization halts, and the planet can survive
203: indefinitely as long as it retains its atmosphere.
204: This condition holds where
205: $a \gtrsim {\rm 1.03~AU} (L_{*}/L_{\odot})^{1/2}$, for $\lambda = 31$, $\omega=1$.
206:
207: Closer in, the planet will slowly vaporize (or sublimate, if ice remains on its
208: surface) at a rate set by the rate of energy transport through the
209: base of the optically thick atmosphere, where the temperature will
210: fall from $T_{G}$ to 647~K at the surface of the boiling ocean.
211: The atmosphere would be stable against
212: convection since it is heated from above; downward energy transport in this
213: stable layer will occur by slow diffusion of radiated thermal energy.
214: The flux of energy
215: transported by radiative diffusion through the lowest scale
216: height of the atmosphere would be
217: $F_{diff} \approx -(16/3)\sigma T^3 \Delta T/\tau_R(T)$,
218: where $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and
219: $\tau_R(T)$ is the Rosseland mean optical depth of the layer.
220: The temperature difference across the layer, $\Delta T$
221: will be $\Delta T = T_{G} - 647$~K. The mean temperature, $T$,
222: will be roughly $(T_{G}+647 \ \rm{K})/2$.
223:
224: The more massive the atmosphere, the slower the vaporization; this process
225: is probably self-limiting. The vaporization rate is
226: $\sim 4 \pi r_0^2 F_{diff}/L$, where $r_0$ is the radius of the planet, and
227: $L \approx 2.26 \times 10^{10}$ erg~g${}^{-1}$
228: is the latent heat of vaporization of water.
229: The optical depth of the atmosphere will increase as more volatiles sublimate, but
230: when $\tau_{R} \approx 10^5 (a/1~AU)^{-2} (L_{*}/L_{\odot})$, the
231: vaporization rate reaches $\sim 10^{-10}$~${M}_{\bigoplus}$~yr${}^{-1}$,
232: i.e., it effectively halts.
233:
234: Suspended aerosols in the atmosphere could easily provide a continuum
235: mass opacity of $\kappa = 0.1$~cm${}^2$~g${}^{-1}$,
236: like clouds in brown dwarfs \citep{coop03}.
237: The planet should have a radius similar to that of the
238: zero temperature sphere described by \citet{zapo69};
239: a zero temperature sphere with mean atomic mass per atom of 13~AMU
240: (half H${}_2$O, half SiO${}_2$)
241: has a radius of $r_0 \approx 1.4$~R${}_{\bigoplus} (M/{\rm M}_{\bigoplus})^{1/3}$.
242: With these assumptions, the limiting optical depth amounts to a mass of gas
243: \begin{equation}
244: M_{max}=2 \times 10^{-3} \ M_{\bigoplus} \ (\kappa / {\rm 0.1~cm}^2{\rm g}^{-1})^{-1} (a/1~AU)^{-2} (L_{*}/L_{\odot}) (M/M_{\bigoplus})^{2/3}.
245: \label{eq:maxmass}
246: \end{equation}
247:
248: Though this thick atmosphere can protect the planet's volatiles from
249: vaporization, the planet is vulnerable
250: during the first billion years of the solar system's life,
251: when the star shines brightly in the EUV, and the planet suffers heavy
252: bombardment by planetesimals. We will consider each of these processes in turn.
253:
254: \section{EUV-DRIVEN ESCAPE}
255:
256: Stellar EUV photons can raise the kinetic energy of gas
257: molecules above the escape velocity, eroding the planet.
258: For example, Pluto has probably lost a few km of surface ice during
259: its lifetime to an EUV driven wind \citep[see the review by][]{traf96}.
260: We can estimate the escape rate by estimating the radius,
261: $r_1$, where the atmosphere first becomes optically thick to EUV.
262: This parameter sets the effective cross-section of
263: the planet for absorbing stellar EUV and also the thickness
264: of the layer which must conduct the deposited energy to the surface.
265: We will neglect the vertical thickness of the opaque
266: region of the atmosphere just above the surface; its
267: scale height should be
268: $h_s \approx {59~\rm km} \ (M/ M_{\bigoplus})^{-2/3}$
269: (assuming steam at 647~K), much less than the
270: typical scale height of the upper layers. This approximation
271: works as long as most of the planet remains liquid (or ice) so the atmosphere
272: has only a small fraction of the planet's mass.
273:
274: \citet{wats81} and \citet{hunt82} modeled the escape of Pluto's atmosphere
275: and the atmospheres of the primordial Earth and Venus
276: using a one-dimensional hydrodynamic model based on the
277: model for the solar wind by \citet{park63}. This model estimates
278: the effective value of $r_1$ for the case of maximum escape
279: flux by assuming all the EUV energy is deposited in a thin layer at $r_1$.
280: This maximum escape flux provides
281: a lower limit for the lifetime of the bound gas.
282:
283:
284: %\begin{eqnarray}
285: %\lambda_0 &=& GMm/{k T_0 r_0} \\
286: %\beta &=& S (GMm/{kT_0^2 \kappa_0}) \\
287: %\zeta &=& F_{esc} (k^2 T_0/{\kappa_0 GMm})
288: %\end{eqnarray}
289:
290: \citet{wats81} define the variables
291: $\lambda_0 = GMm/{k T_0 r_0}$, $\beta = S (GMm/{kT_0^2 \kappa_0})$
292: and $\zeta = F_{esc} (k^2 T_0/{\kappa_0 GMm})$, where
293: $m$ is the mass of a gas molecule.
294: The base of the exosphere, which we will consider to be located
295: at $r_0$, has temperature $T_0$, which we take to be $2.4 T_{BB}$.
296: The flux of escaping particles per steradian per second
297: is $F_{esc}$, and the effective EUV heating rate is
298: $S$, in erg~cm${}^{-2}$~s${}^{-1}$, averaged over a
299: sphere. The thermal conductivity of the gas is
300: assumed to take the form $\kappa=\kappa_0(T/T_0)^s$.
301: The maximum escaping flux satisfies \citep{wats81}:
302: \begin{equation}
303: \zeta = p \left({{(\lambda_1/2)^{{1/p} +1}} \over {\lambda_0 - \lambda_1}} \right)^2
304: \end{equation}
305: \begin{equation}
306: \lambda_1^2 = {\beta \over {\zeta \left (\lambda_0 - \left({p / \zeta} \right)^{1/2} \right) }} ,
307: \end{equation}
308: where $p = 2/(s+1)$.
309: We solved these equations numerically for $\zeta$ as a function of
310: $\beta$ and $\lambda_0$ and integrated the mass loss rate, $\dot M= 4 \pi m F_{esc}$,
311: over time, $t$, since the birth of the planetary system.
312: Since vaporization immediately replaces mass lost to the EUV-driven wind,
313: $\dot M$ is the mass evolution of the planet.
314:
315: This hydrodynamic model applies when $\lambda_0 \gtrsim 10$,
316: i.e., the atmosphere is tightly bound.
317: As $\lambda_0$ decreases,
318: EUV penetrates deeper into the atmosphere, and
319: $r_1$ approaches $r_0$ \citep[see figure 3 of][]{wats81}.
320: We assume that when $\lambda_0 < 7$, $r_1$=$r_0$, meaning
321: that the EUV penetrates all the way to where the atmosphere
322: becomes opaque near the surface of the planet.
323: In this case, $F_{esc} \approx S r_0^3/(GMm)$.
324:
325: The thermosphere may have complicated photochemistry;
326: EUV can dissociate any of the key atmospheric molecules
327: (H${}_{2}$O, NH${}_3$, CH${}_4$, CO, N${}_2$,
328: and CO${}_2$). But we can conservatively estimate the loss rate of
329: these compounds as the escape rate for monatomic H (m = $1.67 \times 10^{-24}$~g).
330: \citet{bank73} calculate that the thermal conductivity for H is
331: $\kappa=379 T^{0.69}$~erg~cm${}^{-1}$~s${}^{-1}$~K${}^{-1}$ between
332: $T=200$ and 2000~K.
333:
334: The effective value of the present day EUV flux at the Earth
335: is $S \approx 1$~erg~cm${}^{-2}$~s${}^{-1}$ \citep{wats81}.
336: Younger solar-mass stars can easily have 100 times
337: as much EUV output as the sun. We assume that
338: $S = {\rm 1~erg~cm}^{-2}$~s${}^{-1} \ (a/{\rm 1~AU})$
339: at $t=4.5$~billion years and thereafter.
340: We assume that prior to that, the EUV output evolved as
341: $(t/4.5 \times 10^{9} \hbox{years})^{-0.8}$, up to
342: $S = {\rm 100~erg~cm}^{-2}$~s${}^{-1} \ (a / {\rm 1~AU})^{-2}$
343: following \citet{zahn82}.
344:
345: %\subsection{EUV-Driven Escape: Results}
346:
347: Figure~\ref{fig:survival} shows the EUV survival time---the time
348: for an all-volatile planet to lose half of its mass to an
349: EUV-driven wind---as a function of initial mass
350: for planets at $a=1$, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.04~AU.
351: The figure suggests that an Earth-mass
352: volatile-rich planet as close as 0.3~AU from a sunlike star can
353: easily retain its volatiles for the age of the solar system.
354: Our model of EUV-driven escape
355: assumes that most of that planet,
356: say 90\%, remains ice or liquid, so that the base of the
357: thermosphere sits near the planet's surface.
358: We estimate that this situation occurs only where
359: $a \gtrsim {\rm 0.14~AU} (M/{M}_{\bigoplus})^{-1/6} (L_{*}/L_{\odot})^{1/2}$.
360: The dashed sections of the curves in Figure~\ref{fig:survival} indicate
361: the regime where this condition is not satisfied.
362:
363:
364: %cp /home/mkuchner/idl/vemp/lifetimefig.ps f1.ps
365:
366: \clearpage
367:
368: \begin{figure}
369: \epsscale{0.8}
370: \plotone{f1.ps}
371: \caption{Survival time for EUV-driven atmospheric escape
372: as a function of mass for volatile planets at
373: 1~AU, 0.3~AU, 0.1~AU, and 0.04~AU. The curves become dashed
374: where the atmosphere becomes $\gtrsim 10$\% of the planet's
375: mass. The dotted line shows the age of the solar system.}
376: \label{fig:survival}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: \clearpage
380:
381: Since volatile-rich Earth-mass planets slowly lose mass to a EUV-driven wind,
382: these planets should be more common around younger
383: stars and stars with lower time-averaged EUV luminosity.
384: Nearby F-, G-, and K-type main-sequence stars have similar
385: levels of EUV output, but nearby M-type main-sequence stars have
386: systematically lower EUV luminosities than more massive nearby
387: main-sequence stars \citep{wood94}. This difference
388: might make M-type stars particularly hospitable to close-in, volatile-rich
389: Earth-mass planets.
390:
391:
392:
393: %Inward migration by disk torques might naturally cease
394: %at $\sim 0.04~AU$, so migrating planets may collect at this special
395: %location \citep[e.g.][]{kuch02}.
396: %However, the massive atmospheres of these hot planets
397: %probably escape even faster than estimated by the model we show.
398: %Planets at 0.04~AU probably also suffer heating from tides.
399:
400: \section{BOMBARDMENT}
401:
402: We assume that the volatile-rich planets migrate after the usual
403: period of terrestrial planet accretion in habitable zone.
404: But ``heavy'' bombardment by leftover planetesimals
405: continued on the terrestrial planets in our solar system for roughly
406: the first billion years of the solar system's life.
407: Such a bombardment can erode the atmosphere of a planet
408: \citep[see the review by][]{ahre93}.
409:
410: A low-mass volatile-rich planet will have escape velocity
411: $v_{esc} \approx {\rm 9~km~s}^{-1} \ ({\rm M}/{\rm M}_{\bigoplus})^{1/3}$.
412: Ejecting a mass $m_{e}$ of material from the planet
413: requires energy ${1 \over 2} m_{e} v_{esc}^2$.
414: But the impactors
415: available in the early solar system would rarely have impact velocities more than
416: a few times $v_{esc}$, so an impactor probably could not eject more than
417: roughly its own mass from the planet's atmosphere,
418: given the $\sim$7\% efficient ejection process found in numerical
419: models of large impacts on the Earth \citep{newm99}.
420: Moreover, only impactors with diameter greater than the scale
421: height of the atmosphere impart a substantial fraction of their energy to the
422: atmosphere \citep{okee82}; smaller impactors just add mass to the planet.
423: A scale height of 59~km corresponds to a projectile with
424: mass $\sim 4 \times 10^{17}$~kg.
425:
426: We appropriate a description provided by \citet{melo89} for the
427: flux of impactors on Mars and the Moon based
428: on crater densities. The number of projectiles per year
429: of mass greater than $m_{p}$ that fall on a planet of effective radius $r_{eff}$
430: is
431: \begin{equation}
432: N_{cum}= 0.25 \ {\rm yr}^{-1} \ (r_{eff}/R_{\bigoplus})^2 \left (1 + 2300 e^{-t/2.2 \times 10^{8} \ {\rm yr}} \right)(m_{p}/1 {\rm kg})^{-0.47},
433: \label{eq:impactor}
434: \end{equation}
435: where we have neglected gravitational focusing---a factor of a few when scaling
436: from Mars to a 1~$M_{\bigoplus}$ planet.
437: If we consider only impactors with masses between $10^{15}$~kg and
438: 1\% of the mass of the moon on a planet with $r_{eff}=R_{\bigoplus}$,
439: Equation~\ref{eq:impactor} implies a total mass of impactors of
440: less than 0.003~$M_{\bigoplus}$.
441: This total mass of impactors poses no hazard whatsoever, even
442: to the survival of an 0.1~$M_{\bigoplus}$ volatile-rich planet.
443:
444: However, the above impactor distribution fails at the high mass end; it
445: does not account for the unusual impactors \citep{trem93} that have masses
446: comparable to a terrestrial planet. Such giant impactors
447: probably created the Earth's moon \citep[e.g.,][]{ward78, canu01}
448: and may have spun up Mars \citep{done93} and robbed Mercury of its
449: low-density material \citep{benz88}.
450: Conceivably, a giant impactor with high enough velocity
451: could remove all the volatiles from a 1~$M_{\bigoplus}$ volatile planet.
452:
453: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
454:
455: The proximity of the snow line to 1 AU in accretion disk models
456: suggests that volatile-rich planets can easily migrate into the
457: habitable zones of solar-type stars.
458: As long as they migrate after terrestrial planet formation and manage
459: to avoid giant impacts, we estimate that volatile-rich planets as small as
460: 0.1~$M_{\bigoplus}$ can retain most of their volatiles for the lifetime
461: of the solar system as close as 0.3~AU from a solar-type star.
462: Closer-in objects may also retain volatiles, but our
463: analysis fails at high heating rates, where the atmosphere's mass becomes
464: substantial.
465: Exterior to $a \gtrsim {\rm 1.03~AU} \ (L_{*}/L_{\odot})^{1/2}$,
466: a water planet can exist in equilibrium with stellar radiation, protected by
467: a thick steam atmosphere. Inside this radius, the planet slowly
468: vaporizes, but we estimate that only a mass
469: of water given by Equation~\ref{eq:maxmass} can vaporize in $10^{10}$ years.
470: Conceivably, both the Earth and Mars could once have been volatile-rich,
471: but both have probably suffered large impacts.
472: Volatile-rich planets should be more common in the
473: habitable zones of young stars and M-type stars.
474:
475: Volatile-rich Earth-mass planets could appear in future surveys for
476: extrasolar Earth analogs. These objects should maintain deep layers of
477: liquid water, melted by accretional energy and radionucleides. At a given mass,
478: a volatile-rich planet should have a slightly larger radius and therefore a
479: greater luminosity than a terrestrial planet.
480: Finding such objects would test core-accretion scenarios for giant planet formation.
481: A small planet is not necessarily a terrestrial planet.
482:
483:
484: \acknowledgements
485:
486: Thanks to Ann Bragg, Ulyana Dyudina, Mike Lecar, Dimitar Sasselov,
487: Sarah Stewart, and Wes Traub for discussions.
488: Thanks also to Alain Leger for sharing with me some of his unpublished
489: work on ocean planets. This work was performed in part under contract
490: with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
491: through the Michelson Fellowship program funded by
492: NASA as an element of the Planet Finder Program. JPL
493: is managed for NASA by the California Institute of Technology.
494:
495:
496: \begin{thebibliography}{}
497:
498:
499: \bibitem[Abe \& Matsui(1985)]{abe85}Abe, Y. \& Matsui, T. 1985, {\it JGR}, 90, 545
500:
501: \bibitem[Adams \& Laughlin(2003)]{adam03}Adams, F.~C. \& Laughlin, G. 2003, Icarus, 163, 290, astro-ph/0301561
502:
503: \bibitem[Ahrens(1993)]{ahre93}Ahrens, T.~J. 1993, \araa, 21, 525
504: %``Impact erosion of terrestrial planetary atmospheres''
505:
506: \bibitem[Banks \& Kockarts(1973)]{bank73}Banks, P.~M. \& Kockarts, G. 1973, Aeronomy, New York, Academic Press
507:
508: \bibitem[Barucci et al.(1995)]{baru95}Barucci, M.~A., Fulchignoni, M. \& Lazzarin, M. 1995, {\it Planet. Space Sci.}, 44, 1047
509: %``Water Ice in Primitive Asteroids''
510:
511: \bibitem[Benz et al.(1988)]{benz88}Benz, W., Slatterly, W.~L. \& Cameron, A.~G.~W. 1988, Icarus, 74, 516
512:
513: %\bibitem[Boss(2000)]{boss00}Boss, A.~P. 2000, \apj, 536, L101
514:
515: \bibitem[Boss(2002)]{boss02}Boss, A.~P. 2002, \apj, 576, 462
516:
517: %\bibitem[Brown(2002)]{brow02}Brown, M.~E. 2002, Ann. Rev. Earth. \& Plan. Sci., 30, 307
518:
519: %\bibitem[Cameron(1997)]{came97}Cameron, A.~G.~W. 1997, Icarus, 126, 126
520:
521: \bibitem[Canup \& Asphaug(2001)]{canu01}Canup, R.~M. \& Asphaug, E. 2001, Nature, 412, 708
522:
523: \bibitem[Cooper et al.(2003)]{coop03}Cooper, C.~S., Sudarsky, D. Milsom, J. A.,
524: Lunine, J. I. \& Burrows, A. 2003, \apj, 586, 1320
525:
526: %\bibitem[Cox(2000)]{cox00}Cox, A.~N., ed. 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th Ed.; New York: Springer-Verlag), p. 266
527:
528: %\bibitem[Chiang \& Goldreich(1997)]{chia97}Chiang, E.~I. \& Goldreich, P. 1997, \apj, 490, 368
529:
530: \bibitem[Dones \& Tremaine(1993)]{done93}Dones, L. \& Tremaine, S. 1993, Icarus, 103, 67
531:
532: \bibitem[Ford \& Tremaine(2003)]{ford03}Ford, E. \& Tremaine, S. 2003, (astro-ph/0305030)
533:
534: %\bibitem[Foust et al.(1997)]{fous97}Foust, J.~A. et al. 1997, Icarus, 126, 362
535:
536: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Tremaine(1980)]{gold80}Goldreich, P. \& Tremaine, S. 1980, \apj, 241, 425
537:
538: %\bibitem[Guillot(1999)]{guil99}Guillot, T. 1999, P\&SS, 47, 1183
539:
540: %\bibitem[Hahn \& Malhotra(1999)]{hahn99}Hahn, J.~M. \& Malhotra, R.
541: %1999, \aj, 117, 304
542: \bibitem[Hayashi(1981)]{haya81}Hayashi, C. 1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35
543:
544: \bibitem[Huang(1959)]{huan59}Huang, S.~S. 1959, Am. Sci., 47, 397
545: %``Occurrence of Life in the Universe''
546:
547: \bibitem[Hunten \& Watson(1982)]{hunt82}Hunten, D.~M. \& Watson, A.~J. 1982, Icarus, 51, 665
548:
549: %\bibitem[Ivanov(2001)]{ivan01}Ivanov, B.~A. 2001, Space Science Reviews, 96, 87
550:
551: \bibitem[Kasting et al.(1993)]{kast93}Kasting, J.~F., Whitmore, D.~P. \& Reynolds, R.~T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108
552:
553: %\bibitem[Kuchner \& Lecar(2002)]{kuch02}Kuchner, M.~J. \& Lecar, M. 2002, \apj, 574, L87
554:
555: \bibitem[Kuchner \& Spergel(2003)]{kuch03}Kuchner, M.~J. \& Spergel, D.~N. 2003, in
556: ASP Conf. Ser. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, ed.
557: D. Deming \& S. Seager (San Francisco:ASP), in press, (astro-ph/0305522)
558:
559: %\bibitem[Leger et al.(2003)]{lege03}Leger, A., et al. 2003,
560: %Proceedings of the conference "Towards other Earths, Darwin/TPF, and the Search
561: %for Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets", Heidelberg, Germany, 22-25 April 2003, ESA
562: %Special Publication SP-539
563: %(to be published end of June, or early July 03).
564:
565: %\bibitem[Lewis(1995)]{lewi95}Lewis, J.~S. 1995, Physics and Chemistry of the Solar System, California, Academic Press
566:
567: \bibitem[Lin et al.(1996)]{lin96}Lin, D.~N.~C.,
568: Bodenheimer, P., \& Richardson, D.~C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606
569: %``Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi
570: %to its present location.''
571:
572: \bibitem[Lunine \& Stevenson(1982)]{luni82}Lunine, J.~I. \& Stevenson, D.~J.
573:
574: \bibitem[Matsui \& Abe(1986)]{mats86}Matsui, T. \& Abe, Y. 1986, Nature, 322, 526
575:
576: \bibitem[Mayor \& Queloz(1995)]{mayo95}Mayor, M. \& Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355
577:
578: \bibitem[Melosh \& Vickery(1989)]{melo89}Melosh, H.~J. \& Vickery, A.~M. 1989, Nature, 338, 487
579:
580: \bibitem[Newman et al.(1999)]{newm99}Newman, W.~I., Symbalisty, E.~M.~D., Ahrens, T.~J.
581: \& Jones, E.~M. 1999, Icarus, 138, 224
582:
583: \bibitem[O'Keefe \& Ahrens(1982)]{okee82}O'Keefe, J.~D. \& Ahrens, T.~J. 1982,
584: Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 190, 103
585:
586: %\bibitem[Owen et al.(1993)]{owen93}Owen et al. 1993, Science, 261, 745
587:
588: \bibitem[Parker(1963)]{park63}Parker, E. 1963, Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Wiley, NY.
589:
590: \bibitem[Petit et al.(1999)]{peti99}Petit, J.-M., Morbidelli, A.
591: \& Valsecchi, G. 1999, Icarus, 141, 367
592:
593: \bibitem[Pollak et al.(1996)]{poll96}Pollack, J.~B., Hubickyj, O.,
594: Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J.~J., Podolak, M. \& Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62
595:
596: %\bibitem[Prialnik \& Akiva(1990)]{pria90}Prialnik, D. \& Akiva, B.-N. 1990, \apj, 355, 281
597:
598: \bibitem[Prinn(1993)]{prin93}Prinn, R.~G. in Protostars and Planets III,
599: ed. E.~H, Levy \& J.~I. Lunine, (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 1005
600:
601: \bibitem[Rasio \& Ford(1996)]{rasi96}Rasio, F.~A., \& Ford, E.~B. 1996, Science, 274, 954
602:
603: \bibitem[Sasselov \& Lecar(2000)]{sass00}Sasselov, D.~D. \& Lecar, M. 2000, \apj, 528, 995
604:
605: \bibitem[Sohl et al.(2002)]{sohl02}Sohl, F., Spohn, T., Breuer, D.,
606: \& Nagel, K. 2002, {\it Icarus}, 157, 104
607:
608: \bibitem[Spohn \& Schubert(2003)]{spoh03}Spohn, T. \& Schubert, G. 2003, {\it Icarus}, 161, 456
609:
610: \bibitem[Stern(1991)]{ster91}Stern, S.~A. 1991, Icarus, 90, 271
611: %``On the number of planets in the outer Solar System:
612: %Evidence of a substantial population of 1000-km bodies.''
613:
614: \bibitem[Stevenson et al.(1986)]{stev86}Stevenson, D.~J., Harris, A.~W. \& Lunine, J.~I. 1986, in Satellites, ed.
615: J.~A. Burns and M.~S. Matthews (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 39
616:
617: \bibitem[Stevenson \& Lunine(1988)]{stev88}Stevenson, D.~J. \& Lunine, J.~I. 1988, Icarus, 75, 146
618:
619: \bibitem[Trafton et al.(1996)]{traf96}Trafton, L.~M., Hunten, D.~M., Zahnle, K.~J.,
620: \& McNutt, R.~L. 1996, in Pluto and Charon, ed. D.~J. Tholen \& S.~A. Stern (Arizona: Univ. Arizona Press), 475
621:
622: \bibitem[Tremaine(1993)]{trem93}Tremaine, S. \& Dones, L. 1993, Icarus, 106, 335
623:
624: %\bibitem[Urey(1955)]{urey55}Urey, H.~C. 1955, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 41, 127
625:
626: %\bibitem[Walker et al.(1981)]{walk81}Walker, J.~C.~G., Hays, P.~B. \& Kasting, J.~F. 1981,
627: %J. Geophys. Res. 86, 9776
628:
629: %\bibitem[Walker(1986)]{walk86}Walker, J.~C.~G. 1986, Icarus, 68, 87
630:
631: \bibitem[Ward(1988)]{ward88}Ward, W.~R. 1988, Icarus, 73, 330
632:
633: %\bibitem[Ward(1997a)]{ward97a}Ward, W.~R. 1997a, Icarus, 126, 261
634:
635: \bibitem[Ward(1997)]{ward97}Ward, W.~R. 1997, \apj, 482, L211
636:
637: \bibitem[Ward \& Cameron(1978)]{ward78}Ward, W.~R. \& Cameron, A.~G.~W. 1978, Proc. Lunar Planet Sci. Conf. 9th, 1205
638: %``Disk Evolution Within the Roche Limit''
639:
640: %\bibitem[Wasserburg \& Papanastassiou(1982)]{wass82}Wasserburg, G.~J. \&
641: %Papanastassiou, D.~A. 1982, in Essays in Nuclear Astrophysics, ed. C.~A. Barnes,
642: %D.~D. Clayton \& D.~N. Schramm (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press), 77
643:
644: \bibitem[Watson et al.(1981)]{wats81}Watson, A.~J., Donahue, T.~M. \& Walker, J.~C.~G.
645: 1981, Icarus, 48, 150
646:
647: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1994)]{wood94}Wood, B.~E. et al. 1994, \apjs, 93, 287
648:
649: \bibitem[Woolf(2003)]{wool03}Woolf, N. 2003, in
650: ASP Conf. Ser. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, ed.
651: D. Deming \& S. Seager (San Francisco:ASP), in press
652:
653: \bibitem[Wuchterl(2000)]{wuch00}Wuchterl, G., Guillot, T., \& Lissauer, J.~J.
654: 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss,
655: \& S. S. Russell (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 1081
656:
657: %\bibitem[Yung \& DeMore(1999)]{yung99}Yung, Y.~L. \& DeMore, W.~B. 1999, Photochemistry of Planetary Atmospheres, (New York: Oxford Univ. Press), 28
658:
659: \bibitem[Zahnle et al.(1988)]{zahn88}Zahnle, K.~J., Kasting, J.~F. \& Pollack, J.~B. 1988, {\it Icarus}, 74, 62
660:
661: \bibitem[Zahnle \& Walker(1982)]{zahn82}Zahnle, K.~J. \& Walker, J.~C.~G. 1982, Rev. Geophys Space Phys, 20, 280
662:
663: \bibitem[Zapolsky \& Salpeter(1969)]{zapo69}Zapolsky, H.~S. \& Salpeter, E.~E. 1969, \apj, 158, 809
664:
665: \end{thebibliography}
666:
667: \end{document}
668:
669:
670: