1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{wrapfig,epsfig,epsf}
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}
4: \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
5: \usepackage{mathtext}
6: \usepackage{rotate}
7: \usepackage{euscript}
8: \usepackage{bm}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \input epsf
13: \draft
14: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.8}
15:
16: \title {\Large\bf The generality of inflation in closed cosmological models with some quintessence
17: potentials }
18: \author{\bf S. A. Pavluchenko}
19: %\email{sergey@xray.sai.msu.ru}
20: \affiliation{ { Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia} }
21:
22:
23: {\begin{abstract}
24: We have investigated the generality of inflation (the probability of inflation in other words) in
25: closed FRW models
26: for a wide class of quintessence potentials. It is shown that inflation is not suppressed for most of
27: them and for a wide
28: enough range of their parameters. It allows us to
29: decide inflation is common enough even in the case of closed Universe.
30: \end{abstract}}
31: \pacs{98.80.Bp, 98.80.Cq, 11.25.-w}
32:
33: \maketitle
34:
35:
36: \section{Introduction}
37:
38: Recent observations of the supernovae type Ia~\cite{snIa_1,snIa_2} combined with the CMB
39: data~\cite{CMB_rec}
40: and the data on large scale structure~\cite{LSS_rec} provide us with evidence our Universe is
41: accelerating. One can
42: explain it via a presence of the small positive $\Lambda$-term (cosmological constant). Here we have a
43: deal with one of kinds
44: of the dynamical $\Lambda$-term namely quintessence (see for review~\cite{als_var00,var02,peeb_ratr02}
45: ). It can explain the stage of inflation expansion~\cite{infl} and acceleration nowadays,
46: this is the reason for improving interest for it recently. But the theories with the scalar
47: field
48: as a source of expansion have a free parameter~-- the potential of this scalar field. Yes, there were
49: attempts to restore kind of the potential from SN Ia observations~\cite{als-sn-v}, but they did not
50: give us an
51: answer to our question about an exact kind of the potential. So one have a deal with different potentials
52: of the scalar field in different areas of physics, not in the cosmology only. And the aim of this paper is
53: the
54: test of some of these potentials, attracted an attention recently. Namely we want to study the
55: degree of inflationarity in
56: Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) models with different scalar field potentials motivated
57: by particle physics, galaxies rotation curves, etc.
58:
59: Saying {\it the degree of inflationarity} we mean the ratio of number of solutions experienced
60: inflation
61: to number of all possible ones. And saying about the number of solutions we mean not exact number~--
62: there is infinite number of all possible solutions~-- but the number one can obtain using evenly
63: distributed
64: net on the space of initial conditions. But choosing this net we are really choosing the {\it measure} on
65: the initial conditions space and after doing it we can speak about the {\it probability}~-- very ratio
66: is the probability of inflation for our model in the sense of measure we chose.
67: So if this ratio is small
68: enough for some potentials one can decide in the model with this potential the inflation is suppressed.
69:
70:
71: Here we work with closed models~-- curvature is the parameter which is "forgotten" during inflation,
72: but before inflation curvature had acted very strongly so presence of nonzero curvature will change the
73: probability of inflation. By the way, recent CMB data~\cite{CMB_rec} show $\Omega_0 = 1.02 \pm 0.02$
74: (but such a models~-- closed FRW~-- have some problems~\cite{Linde_rec})
75: In the case of initially open or flat Universe the scale factor of the Universe $a$
76: cannot pass through extremum points. In this case all the trajectories starting from a sufficiently
77: large initial value of the scalar field $\varphi_0$ reach a slow-roll regime and experience inflation.
78: Here we call as trajectory
79: the evolution curve of the Universe in some coordinates
80: (for example ($a$,$t$) or as in \cite{we99} ($a$,$f$)).
81: If we start from the Planck energy a measure of non-inflating trajectories for a scalar field with the
82: mass $m$ is about $m/m_{P}$. From observational reasons, this ratio is about $10^{-5}$ so almost all
83: trajectories lead to the inflationary regime. However, positive spatial curvature allows a trajectory
84: to have a point of maximal expansion and results in increasing the measure of non-inflating
85: trajectories (\cite{four,B-Kh}).
86:
87:
88: The structure of the paper is following: first we write down main equations and introduce our measures.
89: Then we have a deal with different potentials, motivated by observation and by particle physics and
90: attracted an attention last years. For all of them we say some words about their origins with
91: corresponding references and give the results for the degree of inflationarity in FRW models filled
92: with the scalar field with these potentials.
93:
94: \section{Main equations}
95:
96: Here we follow~\cite{we01gr,we01ijmpd}. The equations describing the evolution of the
97: Universe in closed FRW model are
98: $$
99: \frac{m_P^2}{16 \pi}\left(\ddot a+\frac{{\dot a}^2}{2a}+\frac{1}{2a} \right) + \frac{a}{4} \left(
100: \frac{{\dot \varphi}^2}{2}- V(\varphi) \right) =0,
101: $$
102: $$
103: \ddot \varphi + \frac{3 \dot \varphi \dot {\vphantom{\varphi}a} }{a}+\frac{dV(\varphi)}{d\varphi} =0,
104: $$
105: \noindent and the first integral of the system is
106: $$
107: \frac{3 m_P^2}{8 \pi}\left(\frac{\dot a^2}{a^2} + \frac{1}{a^2}\right)=\left( V(\varphi)+\frac{{\dot
108: \varphi}^2}{2} \right).
109: $$
110:
111: \begin{figure*}
112: \rotatebox{-90}{
113: \epsfxsize=12cm
114: %\centerline{{\epsfbox{pr_ex_1.eps}}}
115: %}
116: \includegraphics{pr_ex_2.ps}}
117: %\includegraphics{proba1.eps}}
118: \caption
119: {Examples of the areas on the initial conditions space which lead to inflation (grey dots) and don't
120: lead
121: (black ones). Figs (a)--(c) correspond to the case of the inverse power-law potential, (d)~-- to the
122: exponential potential and (e)--(f)~-- to the FCDM potential (see Sec. III F.)~-- field parametrization
123: (see text for details).}
124: \end{figure*}
125:
126: Now we need to introduce parametrization~-- it determines the measure we use.
127: For the FRW case the most common view of the
128: {\it trigonometrical (angular)} parametrization $(\phi,H)$ is
129: \begin{widetext}
130: \hfill (*)
131: \begin{eqnarray*}
132: \frac{3 m_P^2}{8 \pi} \left( H^2 + \frac{1}{a^2} \right) = m_P^4, \quad
133: H^2 + \frac{1}{a^2} = \frac{8 \pi m_P^2}{3}, \quad H \in \left[ 0; \sqrt{\frac{8\pi}{3}}m_P \right); \\
134: V(\varphi) + \frac{ {\dot \varphi}^2 }{2} = m_P^4, \quad V(\varphi) = m_P^4 \cos^2 \phi,
135: \quad \frac{ {\dot \varphi}^2 }{2} = m_P^4 \sin^2 \phi, \quad \phi \in \left[ -\frac{\pi}{2}; \frac{\pi}{2}
136: \right].
137: \end{eqnarray*}
138: \end{widetext}
139:
140: Here we have two dimensionless parameters: $\phi$ and the initial value of Hubble parameter $H$.
141: This parametrization is very suitable for the potentials like power-law but unapplicable for example in
142: the case of the complex scalar field~\cite{we01gr,we01ijmpd}. In~\cite{we01gr,we01ijmpd} we have introduced
143: another parametrization~-- {\it field} one $(\varphi,H)$. It is
144: determined as following~-- we will use initial value of the field $\varphi$ instead of $\phi$ and
145: second coordinate is the
146: same~-- initial value of the Hubble parameter $H$. This parametrization also have a disadvantage~--
147: it's unapplicable for example for the
148: runaway potentials.
149:
150: Also we need to introduce the Planck boundary
151: $$
152: V(\varphi) + \frac{ {\dot \varphi}^2 }{2} = m_P^4.
153: $$
154:
155:
156:
157: And our work is following: starting from the Planck boundary for given pair of the initial conditions
158: ($(\phi,H)$ or $(\varphi,H)$) we
159: numerically calculate further evolution of the Universe to get an answer~-- will our Universe
160: experience
161: inflation or not.
162: Here we don't check 60 e-foldings
163: so when the scale factor increase in $10^5$ times, we call it as inflation
164: (also we are checking for equation of state~--
165: during inflation the scalar field must violate the strong energy condition).
166: And doing scans on all possible values
167: of the initial conditions (with measure used we have bounded area of initial conditions) we get the ratio of
168: the inflation solutions to all ones~-- the probability of inflation in some sense (one can use both the
169: {\it probability} of inflation for the model with given potential and the {\it degree of
170: inflationarity} of the model with given potential to call very ratio).
171:
172: \section{Potentials}
173:
174:
175: Before telling about the potentials we use, let us note~-- most of analysis' given in references are made
176: for the case of flat Universe. Well, we are living now in a flat (with good precision) Universe and
177: so we have a deal with quintessence in flat Universe. But our Universe is flat due to the inflation
178: and before inflation it could be curved. As we already noted above, here we have a deal with closed
179: Universe.
180:
181: In this paper we will use normalization $m_P^2/16\pi \equiv 1$ and one needs to keep it in mind while
182: recalculating all values (like parameters in potentials, etc.) to more common quantities.
183:
184:
185: \subsection{Power-law potentials}
186:
187:
188: \begin{figure}
189: \epsfxsize=9cm
190: \centerline{{\epsfbox{Bnew.ps}}}
191: \caption
192: {Inverse power-law potential: the dependence of the degree of
193: inflationarity on the power $q$. I corresponds to the case $M~\sim~m_P $, II~-- $M~\sim~0.7~m_P$ and
194: III~-- $M~\sim~0.4~m_P$.}
195: \end{figure}
196:
197:
198: \begin{figure}
199: \epsfxsize=9cm
200: \centerline{{\epsfbox{C1.ps}}}
201: \caption
202: {Exponential potential: the dependence of the degree of
203: inflationarity on $\lambda$. To recalculate $\lambda$ to more common values one needs to keep in mind
204: $m_P^2/16\pi \equiv 1$.}
205: \end{figure}
206:
207:
208: \begin{figure*}
209: \epsfxsize=12cm
210: \centerline{{\epsfbox{E.ps}}}
211: \caption
212: {ZWS potential: the dependence of the degree of
213: inflationarity on $\alpha$ for $V_0~\sim~4~\times~10^{-4}~m_P^4$ (a) and
214: $V_0~\sim~4~\times~10^{-2}~m_P^4$
215: (b). And like the case of the exponential potential while $\alpha$ is dimensional value $m_P^2/16\pi \equiv
216: 1$.}
217: \end{figure*}
218:
219:
220: Power-law potentials~\cite{we99} are the potentials like
221: $$
222: V(\varphi) = \frac{\lambda{\phi}^n}{n}, \quad n \ge 2.
223: $$
224:
225: These potentials are well-studied and they lead to "chaotic inflation"~\cite{linde_ch}. One can
226: really use them as "inflation part" in the potentials like ones considered by Peebles and
227: Vilenkin~\cite{peeb_vil_99}.
228: Also they
229: attract an attention for some their properties~\cite{class,Kolda_Lyth99}.
230:
231: The degree of inflationarity for such potentials was studied in our previous
232: papers~\cite{we01gr,we01ijmpd,we_new}, so here we will present results only. In the case $n=2$ we have about
233: $47\%$
234: inflation solution in the case of
235: field measure and about $63\%$ in the case of angular measure. Increasing $n$ will decrease the
236: inflationarity
237: in the case of field parametrization and will not change it
238: for the angular parametrization (\cite{we_new})~-- in the angular measure $63\%$ of all possible
239: solutions experience inflation for $n=2,4,6,8$. And in the field measure we have about $30\%$
240: for $n=4$, $22\%$ for $n=6$ and $17\%$ for $n=8$.
241: Damour-Mukhanov potential~\cite{D-M}
242: behaves itself like power-law potentials in this sense and the probability of inflation is about $63\%$
243: in the case of the angular
244: measure and not less then $47\%$ in the case of the field one (for discussion see~\cite{we_new}).
245:
246:
247:
248:
249:
250:
251: \subsection{Inverse power-law potentials}
252:
253: Pioneering studies of the inverse power-law potentials have been done by Ratra and
254: Peebles~\cite{peeb_ratr88}. These potentials are like~\cite{ZWS}
255: $$
256: V(\phi) = M^{(4 + q)} \varphi^{-q}.
257: $$
258:
259: Potentials of such a kind mostly studied for their scaling properties~\cite{class} and with
260: some problems with quintessence~\cite{Kolda_Lyth99}, but also they appear in some SUGRA theories
261: as well~\cite{Brax_Martin}.
262:
263: Here we examine potentials with large enough values of $M$~-- really, for small "observed"
264: values~\cite{peeb_vil_99} we obtained that inflationary solutions are not experience enough number of
265: e-foldings. And it occurs just because of we have a deal with closed model~-- it naturally decrease
266: number of inflationary solutions.
267:
268:
269: One of the ways to get large value of $M$ at the inflation stage and small one nowadays is to
270: consider $M$ as not an exact constant but as slowly varing (namely decreasing). It would not change
271: significantly during inflation but from inflation to nowadays can.
272:
273: And the results are presented in Fig.~1: panels (a)--(c) represent examples of the initial
274: condition space where grey point reflects initial condition leading to inflation (in the sense we noted
275: above) and black one corresponds to recollapse. These figures are plotted for the case $M~\sim~m_P$
276: and $q=2$ (a), $q=6$ (b) and $q=8$ (c).
277: In Fig.~2 we represent the final plot~-- with
278: the degree of inflationarity on {\it y} axes and the power $q$ on {\it x} axes. There are three curves: I
279: corresponds to the case $M~\sim~m_P $, II~-- $M~\sim 0.7~m_P$ and III~-- $M~\sim~0.4~m_P$.
280: Note that in this case~-- inverse power-law potentials~-- we use angular measure only because in field
281: measure the space of initial conditions is unbounded.
282:
283:
284:
285: One can see from Fig.~1 (a)--(c) the areas are asymmetric with respect to $\phi = 0$. It's due to the
286: parametrization~-- from (*) one can see that positive $\phi$ corresponds to positive $\dot \varphi$
287: so we start in this case "down" the potential, at the same time negative $\phi$ corresponds to
288: negative $\dot \varphi$ and so we start "up" the potential. Namely due to this effect the area of
289: inflationary solutions on the space of initial conditions is so asymmetric.
290:
291:
292: \subsection{Exponential potential}
293:
294: Other interesting potential is an exponential one~\cite{peeb_ratr88}
295: $$
296: V(\phi) = V_0 \exp ( - \lambda \varphi ).
297: $$
298:
299: Potentials of such a kind naturally appear in high-energy physics in theories with Kaluza-Klein
300: compactification, superstrings and supergravity theories~\cite{exp_from_sugra}
301: and higher orders
302: gravity theories~\cite{exp_from_high_grav}. This potential is also well-known in flat case for its
303: tracker property and for some implications for observational cosmology~\cite{ferr_joy98,exp_other,
304: class}.
305:
306:
307: Our results are the same for a wide enough range of $V_0~\sim~m_P^4~\div~10^{-10}~m_P^4$.
308: So we have only one free
309: parameter~-- $\lambda$ and the results are plotted in Fig.~3.
310: Example of the area on initial conditions space plotted in Fig.~1(d), where as in the
311: previous cases black dot represents pair of initial $(\phi,H)$ not leading to inflation and
312: grey dot represents leading one.
313: Here as well as in the case of inverse power-law potentials we use only angular
314: parametrization~-- the initial $\varphi$ is unbounded again.
315:
316:
317:
318:
319: \subsection{ZWS potential}
320:
321:
322:
323: \begin{figure*}
324: \epsfxsize=12cm
325: \centerline{{\epsfbox{pr_F.ps}}}
326: \caption
327: {ULM potential: the dependence of the degree of
328: inflationarity on $\alpha$ for fixed $V_0~=~4~\times~10^{-3}~m_P^4 $ in panel (a) and for fixed
329: $\lambda = 0.7~m_P^{-1}$ in panel (b).}
330:
331: \end{figure*}
332:
333:
334: This potential
335: $$
336: V(\varphi) = V_0 \left[ \exp \left( \frac{\alpha}{\varphi} \right) - 1 \right]
337: $$
338:
339: \noindent was suggested by Zlatev, Wang and Steinhardt~\cite{ZWS} while
340: exploring scaling solutions, where $V_0$ and $\alpha$ are free parameters.
341:
342: The dependence of the degree of inflationarity is plotted in Fig.~4: the case for
343: $V_0~\sim~4~\times~10^{-4}~m_P^4$ in (a) panel and the case for $V_0~\sim~4~\times~10^{-2}~m_P^4$ in (b).
344: Areas of initial
345: conditions space leading and not
346: to inflation look like ones in the case of inverse power-law potential
347: (Fig.~1(a)--(c)). Due to the potential (runaway) we can use only the trigonometrical measure.
348:
349:
350:
351:
352: \subsection{ULM potential}
353:
354: This potential was first considered by L.A. Ure$\tilde {\rm n}$a-L\'opez and
355: T. Matos~\cite{Matos_Urena-Lopez00} as a new cosmological tracker
356: solution for quintessence. One can say it behaves itself like both exponential and inverse power-law
357: potentials:
358: $$
359: V(\varphi) = V_0 \sinh^{-\alpha}(\lambda \varphi);
360: $$
361: $$
362: V(\varphi) = V_0 (\lambda \varphi)^{-\alpha} \quad \mbox{for} \; |\lambda \varphi| << 1,
363: $$
364: $$
365: V(\varphi) = 2^{\alpha} \, V_0 e^{-\lambda \varphi \alpha} \quad \mbox{for} \; |\lambda \varphi| >> 1
366: $$
367:
368: \noindent so its asymptotic behavior corresponds to an inverse power-law-like potential at early times
369: and to an exponential one at later times.
370:
371: The space of initial conditions is like the inverse power-law case (Fig.~1~(a)--(c)), and we
372: have again only trigonometrical measure. The results for the degree of inflationarity are plotted in Fig. 5
373: with very degree on {\it y} axes and $\alpha$ on {\it x} axes. In this case we have two parameters~--
374: $V_0$ and $\lambda$ and it's easily to understand the influence of them by fixing one of them and
375: varying another one. Following its in (a) panel we fix
376: $V_0~=~4~\times~10^{-3}~m_P^4$ and vary $\lambda$:
377: $\lambda = 0.7~m_P^{-1}$ (I), $\lambda = 0.5~m_P^{-1}$
378: (II) and $\lambda = 0.21~m_P^{-1}$ (III); in panel (b) we fix $\lambda = 0.7~m_P^{-1}$ and vary $V_0$:
379: $V_0~=~4~\times~10^{-2}~m_P^4$ (I), $V_0~=~4~\times~10^{-3}~m_P^4$ (II) and
380: $V_0~=~4~\times~10^{-4}~m_P^4$ (III).
381:
382:
383: \subsection{FCDM potential}
384:
385: This potential can describe both quintessence and
386: new form of dark matter called~\cite{sahni_wang_99} {\it frustrated cold dark matter} (FCDM) due to
387: its ability to frustrate gravitation clustering at small scales. On this way it can help in solving
388: some problems with dwarf galaxies halos~\cite{halos}.
389:
390: Like previous one it have two asymptotic forms:
391: $$
392: V(\varphi) = V_0 ( \cosh \lambda \varphi - 1 )^p;
393: $$
394: $$
395: V(\varphi) \simeq \tilde V_0\, e^{p \lambda \varphi} \quad \mbox{for} \; |\lambda \varphi| >> 1 \;
396: (\varphi > 0),
397: $$
398: $$
399: V(\varphi) \simeq \tilde V_0 (\lambda \varphi)^{2p} \quad \mbox{for} \; |\lambda \varphi| << 1,
400: $$
401:
402: \noindent where $\tilde V_0 = V_0 /2^p$.
403:
404:
405:
406: \begin{figure*}
407: \rotatebox{-90}{
408: \epsfxsize=18cm
409: %\centerline{{\epsfbox{proba2.eps}}}
410: \includegraphics{pr_pics_2.ps}}
411: \caption
412: {FCDM potential: the dependence of the degree of inflationarity on $V_0$ and $\lambda$; (a)--(c)
413: correspond to the case of field parametrization and (d)--(f) correspond to the case of
414: trigonometrical parametrization. See text for detailed description of the panels.}
415: \end{figure*}
416:
417:
418: In this case like in previous one we have two free parameters (while $p = 0 \div 1$): $V_0$ and
419: $\lambda$. The space of
420: initial conditions with the area of initial conditions leading to inflation looks like in the case of
421: inverse power-law (see Fig.~1~(a)--(c)) in the trigonometrical parametrization case and for field
422: parametrization (enjoy! for this potential we have field parametrization!) examples are presented
423: in Fig. 1(e) and Fig. 1(f).
424: And in Fig.~6 we have presented the dependence curves of the
425: ratio of inflationary solutions to all possible ones on $p$ ($p \in [0,1]$). The dependence of the
426: degree of inflationarity
427: on both $V_0$ and $\lambda$ is hard to describe so we have presented the influence of $V_0$ and
428: $\lambda$ on the curve when one of them is fixed and rest one is variable (as in the previous case).
429: As we have noted above, in this case we have
430: a deal with both field and angular measures. And one can see that the curves behave themselves
431: differently in these measures.
432:
433: Very results are presented in Fig.~6: panels (a)--(c) correspond to the case of field
434: parametrization and panels (d)--(f) correspond to the case of trigonometrical parametrization. Let
435: us describe them: in Fig. 6(a) and 6(d) there are dependence curves of the degree of inflationarity
436: on $\lambda$ for $V_0 = 4 \times 10^{-7} m_P$ and curves are: $\lambda = 0.7 m_P^{-1}$ (I),
437: $\lambda = 7 m_P^{-1}$ (II) and $\lambda = 30 m_P^{-1}$ (III). In Fig 6(b) and 6(e) we again
438: fixed $V_0 = 4 \times 10^{-4} m_P$ and $\lambda = 0.7 m_P^{-1}$ (I),
439: $\lambda = 7 m_P^{-1}$ (II) and $\lambda = 30 m_P^{-1}$ (III). To understand the influence of
440: $V_0$ on the dependence curve one can compare these two cases as well as use Figs. 6(c) and 6(f),
441: where we fixed $\lambda = 7 m_P^{-1}$ and curves are $V_0 = 4 \times 10^{-4} m_P$ (I),
442: $V_0 = 4 \times 10^{-7} m_P$ (II) and $V_0 = 4 \times 10^{-10} m_P$ (III).
443: One can see that in the limit of small $V_0$ all dependence curves are similair each other.
444:
445: So from Fig.~6~(a)--(f) one can determine values for $\lambda$ and $V_0$ which correspond to large
446: enough degree of inflationarity.
447:
448:
449:
450:
451: \section{Summary and discussions}
452:
453: In this paper we have investigated a wide class of the quintessence potentials from the point of view
454: of the generality of inflation. Some of these potentials are
455: motivated via particle physics (for review see, for example, \cite{Lyth_Riotto99}) and most of them
456: were also studied recently from the point of view of scaling or tracker solutions. So here we have made some
457: tests of them~-- are they able to provide our Universe with inflation? And in this way we
458: obtained the answer~-- yes, closed FRW models filled with the scalar field with these potentials
459: experience inflation for a wide enough range of their parameters. So inflation is general for a wide
460: enough class of the cosmological models.
461:
462: As we have a deal with closed model, the degree of inflationarity is smaller then in flat (and
463: of course open) case~-- at
464: the early stage of the Universe's evolution the scale factor was small so presence of nonzero
465: curvature might change the situation significantly. But we have seen that even in the case of positive
466: spatial curvature potentials we have considered behave itself well from this point of view and the
467: inflation is not suppressed in models filled with the scalar field with these potentials. The
468: inflation in closed models was recently studied in the case of pure $\Lambda$-term~\cite{lambda}
469: and they also have a result that the inflation doesn't suppress.
470:
471: In this paper we used as determination of inflation the situation when the scale factor increases in
472: $10^5$ times (about 12 e-foldings) and this approximation works well. For some cases we have checked
473: its up to $10^{25}$ (about 57 e-foldings) and the results are the same with precision about $0.04\%$.
474: So our approximation works well.
475:
476:
477: \section{Acknowledgments}
478:
479: We wish to thank N. Savchenko and A. Toporensky for useful discussion.
480:
481:
482:
483: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
484:
485: \bibitem{snIa_1}
486: S.J. Perlmutter {\it et. al.}, Nature (London) {\bf 391}, 51 (1998);
487: S.J. Perlmutter {\it et. al.}, Astrophys. J. {\bf 517}, 565 (1999).
488:
489: \bibitem{snIa_2}
490: A.G. Riess {\it et. al.}, Astron. J. {\bf 116}, 1009 (1998).
491:
492: \bibitem{CMB_rec}
493: A. Benoit {\it et al.}, astro-ph/0210306; J.E. Ruhl {\it et al.}, astro-ph/0212229; J.H. Goldstein
494: {\it et al.}, astro-ph/0212517; D.N. Spergel {\it et al.}, astro-ph/0302209.
495:
496: \bibitem{LSS_rec}
497: M. Colless {\it et al.}, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. {\bf 328}, 1039 (2001); Efslathiou {\it et al.},
498: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. {\bf 330}, L29 (2002); Verde {\it et al.}, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
499: {\bf 335}, 432 (2002).
500:
501: \bibitem{als_var00}
502: V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D {\bf 9}, 373 (2000) [astro-ph/9904398].
503:
504: \bibitem{var02}
505: V. Sahni, Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 19}, 3435 (2002) [astro-ph/0202076].
506:
507: \bibitem{peeb_ratr02}
508: P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. (to be published), astro-ph/0207347.
509:
510: \bibitem{infl}
511: A.H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 23}, 347 (1981); A.D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 108}, 389 (1982);
512: A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 48}, 1220 (1982); Sato, Mon. Not. R. Astron.
513: Soc. {\bf 195}, 467 (1981);
514: A. Starobinsky, Pis'ma A.J. {\bf 4}, 155 (1978), Sov. Astron. Lett. {\bf 4}, 82 (1978).
515:
516: \bibitem{als-sn-v}
517: A. Starobinsky {\it et. al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 2236 (2000); {\bf 85}, 1162 (2000);
518: A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. {\bf 68}, 757 (1998).
519:
520: \bibitem{Linde_rec}
521: A. Linde, astro-ph/0303245.
522:
523: \bibitem{four}
524: V.A. Belinsky, L.P. Grishchuk, Ya.B. Zeldovich and I.M. Khalatnikov,
525: JETP {\bf 89}, 346 (1985).
526:
527: \bibitem{B-Kh}
528: V.A. Belinsky and I.M. Khalatnikov, JETP {\bf 93}, 784 (1987);
529: V.A. Belinsky, H. Ishihara, I.M. Khalatnikov and H. Sato,
530: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 79}, 676 (1988).
531:
532: \bibitem{we99}
533: S.A. Pavluchenko and A.V. Toporensky, Gravitation $\&$ Cosmology {\bf 6}, 241 (2000) [gr-qc/9911039].
534:
535: \bibitem{we01gr}
536: S.A. Pavluchenko and A.V. Toporensky, Gravitation $\&$ Cosmology Suppl. {\bf 8}, 168 (2002).
537:
538: \bibitem{we01ijmpd}
539: S.A. Pavluchenko, N.Yu. Savchenko and A.V. Toporensky, Int. J. Mod. Phys.
540: D {\bf 11}, 805 (2002) [gr-qc/0111077].
541:
542: \bibitem{we_new}
543: S.A. Pavluchenko and A.V. Toporensky, in preparation.
544:
545: \bibitem{Lyth_Riotto99}
546: D.H. Lyth and A. Riotto, Phys. Rept. {\bf 314}, 1 (1999) [hep-ph/9807278].
547:
548: \bibitem{D-M}
549: T. Damour and V.F. Mukhanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 3440 (1998),
550: A. Liddle and A.Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 083508 (1998).
551:
552: \bibitem{class}
553: A.R. Liddle and R.J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 023509 (1998).
554:
555:
556: \bibitem{peeb_ratr88}
557: B. Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 37}, 3406 (1988); P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra,
558: Astrophys. J., Lett. Ed. {\bf 325}, L17 (1988).
559:
560:
561: \bibitem{linde_ch}
562: A. Linde, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 129}, 177 (1983).
563:
564: \bibitem{peeb_vil_99}
565: P.J.E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 063505 (1999).
566:
567: \bibitem{sahni_wang_99}
568: V. Sahni and L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 103517 (2000) [astro-ph/9910097].
569:
570: \bibitem{halos}
571: B. Moore {\it et. al.}, astro-ph/9903164; J.F. Navarro and M. Steinmetz, astro-ph/9908114;
572: S. Ghigna {\it et. al.}, astro-ph/9910166; D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.
573: {\bf 84}, 3760 (2000); M. Kanionkowski and A.R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4525 (2000).
574:
575: \bibitem{ferr_joy98}
576: P.G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 4740 (1997); Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 023503
577: (1998).
578:
579: \bibitem{Kolda_Lyth99}
580: C. Kolda and D.H. Lyth, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 458}, 197 (1999).
581:
582: \bibitem{Brax_Martin}
583: Ph. Brax and J. Martin, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 468}, 40 (1999) [astro-ph/9905040]; Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61},
584: 103502 (2000).
585:
586: \bibitem{exp1}
587: C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B252}, 302 (1985); {\bf B252}, 688 (1985); Astron. Astrophys.
588: {\bf 301}, 321 (1995); E.J. Copeland {\it et. al.}, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. {\bf 688}, 647 (1993).
589:
590: \bibitem{exp_from_high_grav}
591: C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B252}, 309 (1985); Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 152},
592: 51 (1985); Nucl. Phys. {\bf B289} 787 (1987); J. Halliwell, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B266}, 228 (1986); J.D.
593: Barrow and S. Cotsakis, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 214}, 515 (1988).
594:
595: \bibitem{exp_from_sugra}
596: A.B. Burd and J.D. Barrow, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B308}, 929 (1988); J. Yokoyama and K. Maeda, Phys. Lett. B
597: {\bf 207}, 31 (1988); P. Bin\'etruy, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 063502 (1999) [hep-ph/9810553].
598:
599: \bibitem{exp_other}
600: E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 4686 (1998);
601: P.T.P. Viana and A.R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 674 (1998); T. Barreiro, E.J. Copeland and N.J.
602: Nunes, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 127301 (2000); A. Albrecht and C. Skordis, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84},
603: 2076 (2000).
604:
605: \bibitem{ZWS}
606: I. Zlatev, L. Wang and P.J. Stainhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 82}, 896 (1999); Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59},
607: 123504 (1999).
608:
609: \bibitem{Matos_Urena-Lopez00}
610: L.A. Ure$\tilde {\rm n}$a-L\'opez and T. Matos, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 081302(R) (2000).
611:
612: \bibitem{lambda}
613: J.P. Uzan, U. Kirchner and G.F.R. Ellis, [astro-ph/0302597].
614:
615:
616:
617: \end{thebibliography}
618:
619: \end{document}