1: %%
2: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
5:
6: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
7: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
8: \def\cmmd{\hbox{\kern 0.20em cm$^{-2}$}}
9: \def\htwo{\hbox{H${}_2$}}
10: \def\cmmt{\hbox{\kern 0.20em cm$^{-3}$}}
11: \def\msol{\hbox{\kern 0.20em $M_\odot$}}
12: \def\kms{\hbox{\kern 0.20em km\kern 0.20em s$^{-1}$}}
13: \def\K{\hbox{\kern 0.20em K}}
14: \def\mum{\hbox{\kern 0.20em $\mu$m}}
15: \def\mjy{\hbox{\kern 0.20em mJy}}
16:
17: \shorttitle{Warm Molecular Hydrogen and ionized Neon in HH~2}
18: \shortauthors{Lefloch et al.}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{Warm Molecular Hydrogen and Ionized Neon in the HH~2 Outflow
23: \footnote{Based on observations with ISO, an ESA project with instruments
24: funded by ESA Member States (especially the PI countries: France
25: Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) and with the
26: participation of ISAS and NASA}
27: }
28:
29:
30: \author{B. Lefloch\altaffilmark{1}}
31: \affil{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, Observatoire de Grenoble, BP\,53,
32: F-38041 Grenoble C\'edex 9, France}
33: \email{Bertrand.Lefloch@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr}
34:
35: \author{J.~Cernicharo \altaffilmark{2}}
36: \affil{Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient\'{\i}ficas,
37: Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, Serrano 123, E-28006 Madrid
38: }
39: \author{S.~Cabrit\altaffilmark{3}}
40: \affil{LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8112 du CNRS, France{3}
41: }
42: \author{A.~Noriega-Crespo\altaffilmark{4}}
43: \affil{SIRTF Science Center, Caltech JPL, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
44: }
45: \author{A.~Moro-Mart\'{\i}n\altaffilmark{5}}
46: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
47: }
48: \author{D.~Cesarsky\altaffilmark{6}}
49: \affil{Max-Planck Institut f\"{u}r Extraterrestrische Physik, 85741
50: Garching, Germany
51: }
52:
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: We report on spectro-imaging observations of the Herbig-Haro~2 outflow with
56: the ISOCAM camera onboard the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO).
57: The [\ion{Ne}{2}]~12.81$\mu m$ and [\ion{Ne}{3}]~15.55$\mu m$ lines are
58: detected only
59: towards the jet working surface (HH~2H), consistent with the high
60: excitation of this knot in the optical range, while
61: \htwo\ pure rotational emission is found all over
62: the shocked region HH~2. The low energy transition
63: S(2) traces warm gas {\bf ($\rm T\sim 400\K$)}
64: peaked towards knots E-F and extended ejecta ($\rm T\sim 250-380\K$) with
65: masses of a few $10^{-3}\msol$ in the high-velocity CO outflow extending
66: between the powering source and HH~2. Such emission could arise from
67: low-velocity C-type shocks ($\rm v\simeq 10-15\kms$).
68: The higher transitions S(3)-S(7)
69: trace the emission of hot shocked gas ($\rm T= 1000-1400\K$) from
70: individual optical knots in the HH~2 region. The ortho to para (OTP) ratio
71: exhibits large spatial variations between 1.2 (E) and 2.5 (H),
72: well below its value at LTE. The emission of the
73: S(3)-S(7) lines is well accounted for by planar C-shock models with a
74: typical velocity $\rm V_s= 20-30\kms$ propagating into a medium of density
75: $\rm n_i= 10^4-10^5\cmmt$ with an initial OTP ratio close to 1 in the
76: pre-shock gas. In the
77: leading edge of the jet, where the geometry of the emission allows a simple
78: modelling, a good agreement is found with velocities derived from
79: the optical proper motions measured in the ionized gas.
80: \end{abstract}
81:
82: \keywords{ISM: Herbig-Haro objects --- ISM: individual (HH 1/2) ---
83: ISM: jets and outflows --- ISM: molecules - stars: formation}
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: Bipolar outlows from embedded young stellar objects (YSOs) are perhaps
88: one of the most spectacular manifestations of the star formation process.
89: One of the best studied and brightest outflows is that of the
90: Herbig-Haro (hereafter HH)~1/2 system
91: (Reipurth 1993). The HH~1/2 system lies in the Orion molecular cloud
92: at 440 pc and subtends a $\sim 2\arcmin$ angle. The VLA 1 embedded source
93: (Pravdo et al. 1985) drives a highly collimated jet that reaches
94: atomic gas velocities of $\sim 480\kms$~
95: (Eisl\"offel et al. 1994) and produces shocks of $\sim 100\kms$
96: at its main working surface or {\it bow shock}
97: (Noriega-Crespo et al. 1989). At optical wavelengths there are at
98: least 3 distinct jet flows arising within $5\arcsec$ of the VLA~1 source
99: and the HH~1/2 bow shocks display a complex morphology in high spatial
100: resolution HST images (Bally et al. 2002).
101: The optical jet is associated with a molecular outflow whose high-velocity
102: (the "molecular jet") covers deprojected velocities of $15-80\kms$ with
103: respect to the ambient cloud (Moro-Mart\'{\i}n et al. 1999).
104: Because of these characteristics the HH~1/2 system is a perfect target
105: to study the gas properties in a shock heated environment as well as
106: the spatial distribution and the nature of these shocks.
107: One of the promises of ISO
108: was precisely to be able to discern between the different shocks, either
109: C-type or J-type, occurring in a molecular environment.
110:
111: We present here spectro-imaging observations of the VLA~1 counter-jet
112: and the HH~2 region obtained between 5 and $\rm 17\mu m$ with
113: the ISOCAM camera onboard ISO. We find that the
114: \htwo\ pure rotational lines S(2) to S(7) arise from
115: two physically distinct regions~: a faint extended warm gas component
116: associated
117: with the high-velocity CO jet, seen mainly in S(2), and several more
118: compact peaks tracing hotter shocked gas in the individual knots A-L of
119: HH~2 detected in all lines. We report also on the
120: presence of the [\ion{Ne}{3}]~15.55$\mu m$ and [\ion{Ne}{2}]~12.8$\mu m$
121: lines. HH~2 is the only outflow of low-luminosity
122: where these infrared lines have been detected so far
123: (see Cabrit et al. 1998).
124:
125: \section{Observations}
126: \label{observ}
127:
128: All observations were obtained with the ISO satellite (Kessler et al.,
129: 1996) and the ISOCAM instrument (Cesarsky et al. 1996). The low resolution
130: spectra ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda= 40$) between 5 and $\rm 17\mu m$ were
131: obtained in revolution 691 with the Circular Variable Filter (CVF) with a
132: pixel scale of $6\arcsec$ and a total field of view of $3\arcmin$ centered
133: on the HH~2 object. The last pipeline version of the data (OLP10) has been
134: processed following the package developed at the Institut d'Astrophysique
135: Spatiale, which removes reasonably well the problem of transients. The
136: size (HPFW) of the Point Spread Function (PSF) is $\approx 6\arcsec$ for a
137: pixel scale of $6\arcsec$.
138:
139: In order to establish accurate astrometry, we used a second CVF map
140: containing the optically visible Cohen-Schwartz (CS) star, taken in
141: revolution 873 with a $3\arcsec$ pixel scale. This second dataset was
142: processed in the same way as mentioned above. Unfortunately, internal
143: reflections between the CVF and the field lens produced spurious ghosts of
144: the CS star, which is a strong IR emitter, over the full field, preventing
145: any quantitative analysis of the \htwo\ line emission in the second data
146: set. However, the presence of the VLA~1 protostar in both data cubes
147: allows to derive an accurate astrometry for the first CVF image taken with
148: a $6\arcsec$ pixel scale. The data are presented in Figure 1.
149: Coordinates are offsets (arcsec)
150: relative to the position of VLA1~: $\alpha_{2000}= 05^{h}36^{m}22.6^{s}$,
151: $\delta_{2000}= -06^{\circ} 46' 25\arcsec$.
152: The interstellar extinction towards
153: HH~2 was estimated by Hartmann \& Raymond
154: (1984), who measured typical reddenings $E(B-V)= 0.11 - 0.44$. Based on
155: the extinction curve of Rieke \& Lebofsky (1985), it appears that the flux
156: dereddening corrections are negligible and we use uncorrected flux values
157: in what follows.
158:
159:
160: \section{Results}
161:
162: \label{results}
163:
164: Individual CVF spectra towards various optical knots in HH~2 are displayed
165: in the panels of Fig.~1b. Knot positions are referred by letters A to L
166: following the nomenclature of Eisloeffel et al. (1994). At most positions,
167: the bulk of the emission in the 5-17\mum\ range comes from the \htwo\ pure
168: rotational lines S(2) to S(7). An exception is the region near
169: HH~2~H (positions H,B,D) where the fine structure ionic lines
170: [\ion{Ne}{2}]~$12.81\mu m$ and [\ion{Ne}{3}] 15.55\mum\ are also detected,
171: and even dominate over \htwo\ lines at the nominal position of knot H.
172: The spatial distribution of emission flux in the \htwo\ v=0-0 S(2),
173: S(3), S(5)
174: lines and in the [Ne II]~12.8\mum\ ionic line is illustrated in Fig.~1a and
175: Fig.~1c. Three types of morphologies are observed, depending on the line
176: excitation~:
177:
178: (i)~The ionic lines [\ion{Ne}{2}] and [\ion{Ne}{3}] show a single peak
179: towards knot H (of typical size $\approx 7\arcsec$ at HPFW).
180: (ii)~The intermediate excitation lines S(3) and S(5) show two peaks of
181: comparable brightness, one
182: encompassing E, and another peak centered {\sl between} knots H and D,
183: shifted by $3\arcsec$ from the ionic line peak.
184: (iii)~The low energy S(2) line in Fig.~1a shows a single peak (of
185: size 13'') encompassing knots E and F. The emission peaks
186: at the tip of the molecular jet $15\arcsec$ downstream the CO brightness
187: peak. The lowest contours of S(2) emission reveal
188: a broad pedestal that points towards VLA1/4 (Fig.~1a). Note that the first
189: contour is at $5\sigma$ above the map noise level.
190: The pedestal overlaps well with the CO ``jet''
191: and suggests that both the CO and \htwo\ emissions are somewhat related,
192: although tracing different regions in the ``jet''.
193:
194: The overall agreement between the brightness distributions of the pure
195: \htwo\ rotational lines and the higher excitation line
196: $2.12\mu m$~1-0~S(1) (Davis et al. 1994) is good. Comparison of the line
197: intensities indicates that the \htwo\ pure rotational lines are collisionally
198: excited (Wolfire \& K\"{o}nigl 1991).
199: We show in the right panels of Figure 1 the \htwo\ rotational diagrams
200: obtained towards three
201: representative positions : a region in the CO jet (polygon in Fig.~1a), knot
202: HH 2E (peak of \htwo\, no ionic line emission) and knot HH 2D (both
203: ionic and
204: molecular features). Overall, the fluxes of the lines $\rm S(J\geq 3)$
205: match well a linear fit at all positions. The
206: excitation temperature $\rm T_{ex}$, the ortho to para ratio (OTP), and the
207: total \htwo\ column density of this ``hot'' component are estimated from a
208: common linear fit to the temperature for the ortho and para species
209: in the excitation diagram, and are summarized in Table~1.
210:
211: Our analysis shows evidence for a hot gas layer with a temperature in the
212: range 970-1400~K, total \htwo\ column density ranging between 0.18 (H) and
213: $1.6\times 10^{19}\cmmd$ (E), and OTP ratio ranging between 1.2 (E) and 2.5
214: (H). There is no spatial trend in the values, i.e. upstream knots do not have
215: a higher OTP ratio. Interestingly, there appears to be some correlation between
216: variations in OTP and $\rm T_{ex}$~: the smallest OTP (1.2) is found towards
217: HH~2E, which has among
218: the lowest $\rm T_{ex}$, while the highest OTP (2.5) is found towards HH 2H,
219: which has the highest $\rm T_{ex}$. Knots A,C,D, and L fall in between these
220: two extremes. Knots B,K,G are the only positions that deviate from this
221: trend (low $\rm T_{ex}$ but OTP close to 2).
222: The OTP ratios measured are systematically lower than the LTE value at
223: {\em all} positions but H. It is consistent with the low-excitation
224: temperatures measured in the hot gas if \htwo\ is excited by means of a
225: C-shock (see e.g. Wilgenbus et al. 2000).
226:
227: The rotational diagrams show that, at each position, the population of
228: the upper
229: level of the S(2) line lies well above the hot component fit to the other
230: transitions. This implies that the pedestal \htwo\ emission is dominated by
231: a second gas component at a lower temperature, discussed in Sect.~4.3
232:
233: \section{Discussion}
234: \label{discus}
235:
236: \subsection{Ionic emission in HH 2H}
237: The detection of the [\ion{Ne}{2}]12.8\mum\ line towards HH 2H is a clear
238: signature of J-shocks with velocities above $60\kms$
239: (Hollenbach \& McKee 1989). The presence of [\ion{Ne}{3}] is consistent
240: also with the detection of the [\ion{Si}{2}] 34.8\mum~line in HH~2, which
241: suggests
242: shock velocities of $100-140\kms$ (Molinari \& Noriega-Crespo 2002). That
243: [\ion{Ne}{2}] and [\ion{Ne}{3}] are detected only towards HH~2H is in line
244: with the particularly high excitation of this knot in the optical (B\"ohm
245: \& Solf 1992), and its proper motion larger than $400\kms$
246: (Bally et al. 2002). The high
247: excitation of HH~2H is attributed to it being the current location of the
248: jet working surface (Bally et al. 2002).
249:
250: The shock speeds inferred in knot H exceed by far the speed at which
251: molecules are dissociated ($\sim 70\kms$ for a C-shock at $\rm n_0(H)=
252: 10^4\cmmt$; LeBourlot et al. 2002, and $\sim 25\kms$ for a J-shock;
253: Hollenbach \& McKee 1989).
254: This is consistent with the \htwo\ peak in S(5) being spatially
255: shifted from HH~2H. A similar shift was seen in the \htwo\ 1-0 S(1)
256: line (Noriega-Crespo \& Garnavich, 1994). It
257: indicates that the \htwo\ comes from a separate, lower
258: velocity shock not physically associated with knot H.
259:
260: \subsection{Shock-excitation of the hot \htwo\ component in HH knots}
261:
262: Models of non-dissociative J-shocks (Wilgenbus et al. 2000) or
263: dissociative J-shocks with \htwo\ reformation (Flower et al. 2003)
264: fail to reproduce the CVF data as
265: the predicted line intensities, expecially S(3)-S(5), are much too weak, or
266: the required shock velocity is too low ($\sim 10\kms$). On the contrary,
267: everywhere in HH~2, the recent models of planar C-shocks
268: (Le Bourlot et al. 2002; Cabrit et al. 2003) provide a much better
269: match with the observations.
270:
271: Comparison with the observations favors models with velocity in the
272: range $20-30\kms$ and
273: a preshock density in the range $10^5-10^4\cmmt$ respectively
274: (see the rotational diagrams in Fig.~1). Observations of
275: higher-J \htwo\ lines would allow to
276: better constrain the density in the pre-shock gas. This range of densities
277: also agrees with the determinations obtained in the ambient molecular cloud
278: (Girart et al. 2002). The OTP ratio in the pre-shock gas is found
279: $\simeq 1$. The observed variations in the OTP ratio from knot
280: to knot can be produced by changes in the shock speed or preshock
281: density, and do not require variations in the initial OTP ratio in the
282: preshock gas.
283: The characteristic size of the shock emitting region is constrained to be of
284: the order of $0.8\arcsec-1.7\arcsec$ depending on the individual knots,
285: which compares well with their size in the optical.
286:
287: The above shock velocities are derived from planal models whereas HST images
288: provide large evidence for numerous bow-shaped features in HH~2
289: (Bally et al. 2002). For several knots near the leading edge of HH~2
290: where the geometry is rather simple and bow-shaped features easily identified
291: (e.g. F, E, L), the shock velocities compare well with the proper motions
292: of the bow wings in the optical (e.g. $50-60\kms$ at E) taking into
293: account the obliquity of the shock with respect to the direction of the
294: motion.
295:
296: The absence of spatial trend in the OTP values probably results from the
297: various shocks associated with the mini bows, unresolved in our CVF images.
298: Each of these shocks modify the OTP ratio depending on its own excitation
299: conditions.
300:
301: \subsection{Warm extended $\htwo$ component}
302:
303: An {\sl upper limit} to the temperature of the extended
304: warm component in the \htwo\ pedestal can be derived from the
305: ratio of the S(2) and S(3) lines (adopting an OTP ratio
306: similar to that in the ambient cloud, close to 1). We find
307: $\rm T\leq 420\K$ at the \htwo\ peak and
308: $\rm T\leq 380\K$ towards the CO jet. Note that a similar constraint,
309: {\em independent of the OTP ratio}, is obtained by assuming that
310: at most 50\% of the S(4) flux comes from the pedestal.
311:
312: Conversely, in the optically thin limit, we can also
313: derive a {\sl lower limit} to the temperature by imposing that the
314: warm component contributes to most of the observed flux of the J= 2-1
315: line in the CO "jet" and assuming a standard abundance
316: $\rm [CO]/[\htwo]= 10^{-4}$ (Flower and Pineau des For\^ets 1994 showed
317: indeed that the CO abundance varies little in C-shocks).
318: This temperature is found by equating expressions of the \htwo\ column
319: density derived from both tracers. Towards the region of maximum CO
320: flux ($10-20\K\kms$) in the jet
321: the \htwo\ S(2) line flux is $\simeq 8\mjy$/pixel, which yields
322: a minimum temperature of $\simeq 240-300\K$ in the pedestal. This
323: determination depends very little on the adopted OTP value. At
324: the \htwo\ peak the CO(2-1) emission is much weaker
325: ($\simeq 6\K\kms$) and we infer $\rm T \ge 400\K$.
326:
327: The warm gas at $240-420$~K detected in the pure \htwo\ rotational
328: lines of low-J is predominantly concentrated towards the tip of the
329: high-velocity CO jet. The S(2) line suggests a warm gas column
330: density of about $2\times 10^{20}\cmmd$ at knots E-F and a corresponding
331: mass of $\sim 2\times 10^{-3}\msol$.
332: The hot gas seen towards the high-velocity CO jet has a 10 times lower
333: column density (Fig.~1). To reproduce the observed J=4 population, as
334: well as the limits on the excitation temperature, a low-velocity
335: C-shock with a filling factor of 1, implied by the extended character of
336: the S(2) emission, is needed. Then, a rather slow shock
337: at a velocity of $\sim 10-15\kms$ into gas of density $\rm n(H)\simeq
338: 10^5\cmmt$, with an excitation temperature of 250~K would account for
339: the \htwo\ emission of the pedestal along the CO jet.
340:
341: Observations of higher~J CO rotational lines at higher angular
342: resolution are needed to determine more precisely the physical
343: conditions of the high-velocity CO gas and to compare it with that
344: traced in S(2) and with molecular shock predictions.
345:
346: \acknowledgments
347: J. Cernicharo acknowledges Spanish DGES for this
348: research under grants PNAYA 2000-1784 and ESP2001-4516.
349: ANC's research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
350: California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA;
351: and partially supported by NASA-APD Grant NRA0001-ADP-096.
352:
353: \begin{thebibliography}{}
354: \bibitem{ball02} Bally J., Heathcote, S., Reipurth, B., Morse, J.,
355: Hartigan, P., and Schwartz, R. 2002, AJ, 123, 2667
356: \bibitem{bohm92} B\"ohm, K.-H., Noriega-Crespo, A., \& Solf, J. 1992,
357: \apj, 416, 647
358: \bibitem[]{bohm92} B\"ohm, K.-H., Solf, J., 1992, \aj, 104, 1193
359: \bibitem[]{} Cernicharo, J., Reipurth, B., 1996, \apj, 460, L57
360: \bibitem[]{} Cabrit, S., Bontemps, S., Lagae, P.O., et al., 1998, in
361: "The Universe as seen by ISO", pg 449, SP-427, eds P. Cox \& M.F.
362: Kessler, ESA Publications Division, ESTEC, The Netherlands
363: \bibitem[]{} Cabrit, S., 2003, in prep.
364: \bibitem[]{cesar} Cesarsky, C.J., Abergel, A., Agnese, P., et al., 1996,
365: \aap, 315, L32
366: \bibitem[]{dav} Davis, C.J., Eisl\"offel, J., Ray, T.P., 1994, \apj, 426, L93
367: \bibitem[]{eis94} Eisl\"offel, J., Mundt, R., \& B\"ohm 1994, AJ, 108,
368: 104
369: \bibitem[]{} Flower, D.R., Pineau des Forets, G., 1994, MNRAS, 268, 724
370: \bibitem[]{} Flower, D.R., LeBourlot, J., Pineau des Forets, G., Cabrit,
371: S., 2003, MNRAS, in press
372: \bibitem[]{} Girart, J.M., Viti, S., Williams, D.A., et al., 2002,
373: \aap, 388, 1004
374: \bibitem[]{hartr} Hartmann, L. \& Raymond, J.C., 1984, \apj, 276, 560
375: \bibitem[]{hm89} Hollenbach, D., \& McKee, C. F. 1989, \apj, 342, 306
376: \bibitem[]{kes} Kessler, M.F., Steinz, J.A., Anderegg, M.E., et al., 1996,
377: \aap, 315, L27
378: \bibitem[]{lebour02} Le Bourlot, J., Pineau des For\^ets, G., Flower,
379: D. R. \& Cabrit, S. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 985
380: \bibitem[]{} Molinari, S., Noriega-Crespo, A., 2002, \apj, 123, 2010
381: \bibitem[]{} Moro-Mart\'{\i}n, A., Cernicharo, J., Noriega-Crespo, A.,
382: Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., 1999, ApJ, 520, L111
383: \bibitem[]{nori1} Noriega-Crespo, A., B\"ohm, K.H., \& Raga, A.C. 1989,
384: AJ, 98, 1388
385: \bibitem[]{nori1} Noriega-Crespo, A., Garnavich, P.M., 1994, \aj, 108, 1432
386: %\bibitem[]{} Raga, A., , Canto, J., Binette, L., Calvet, N., 1990, \apj,
387: %366, 601
388: \bibitem[]{reip1} Reipurth, B., Heathcote, S., Roth, M.,Noriega-Crespo, A.,
389: Raga, A.C. 1993, \apj, 408, L49
390: \bibitem[]{} Rieke, G.H., Lebofsky, M.J., 1985, \apj, 288, 618
391: \apj, 481, 282
392: \bibitem[]{wolf} Wolfire, M.G., Konigl, A., 1991, \apj, 383, 205
393: \bibitem[]{wil} Wilgenbus,D., Cabrit, S., Pineau des Forets, G., Flower,
394: D.R., 2000,\aap, 356, 1010
395: \end{thebibliography}
396:
397: \clearpage
398:
399: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
400: \tablewidth{0pt}
401: \tablehead{
402: \colhead{Knot} & \colhead{OTP} & \colhead{$\rm T_h$} &
403: \colhead{$\rm N_h(\htwo)$} \\
404: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{($10^{18}\cmmd$)} \\
405: }
406: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
407: \tablecaption{ Parameters of the hot molecular gas derived from
408: rotational diagram analysis. %%
409: }
410: \startdata
411: A & 1.7 & 1300 & 2.4 \\
412: B & 1.9 & 1100 & 4.0 \\
413: C & 1.4 & 1070 & 2.8 \\
414: D & 1.5 & 1350 & 4.2 \\
415: E & 1.2 & 1030 & 16 \\
416: G & 2.1 & 1030 & 6.9 \\
417: H & 2.5 & 1440 & 1.8 \\
418: K & 2.0 & 970 & 7.2 \\
419: L & 1.4 & 1070 & 2.7 \\
420: \enddata
421: \end{deluxetable}
422:
423: \clearpage
424:
425:
426: {\small\noindent Fig.~1 --
427: {(\em left)}
428: {\bf (a)~:} Intensity contour map of the \htwo\ 0-0 S(2) line (pink)
429: superposed on a [\ion{S}{2}] color image of the HH~1/2 region
430: (Reipurth et al. 1993). Contour levels are 4, 7 10, 15, 20, ...,
431: $45\mjy/$pixel.
432: We have superposed the emission of the high-velocity CO outflow in white
433: contours. First contour and contour interval are 5 and 2.5~K~km~s$^{-1}$
434: respectively.
435: The position of the VLA~1-4 sources is indicated by
436: yellow filled circles.
437: Black dots mark the location of the knots A-L.
438: {\bf (b1-b9)~:} CVF spectra at selected positions. Fluxes are in mJy/pixel.
439: The jet spectrum is an average of the individual CV spectra between HH~2
440: and VLA~1 in the area of the polygon (yellow) on panel a. The
441: wavelength of the pure rotational \htwo\ transitions
442: S(2) to S(7) is marked with red ticks.
443: {\bf (c)~:} Superposed on the same [\ion{S}{2}] picture~: emission contour
444: map of the lines $\htwo$ S(3) (c1), $\htwo$ S(5) (c2) and [\ion{Ne}{2}]
445: (c3). Contour levels are 0.1, 0.2, ... 0.9 times the brightness peak.
446: The \htwo\ intensity contour maps in panels (a) and (c) have been convolved
447: with a gaussian of 9\arcsec\ HPFW. \\
448: {(\em right)}~Rotational diagrams for the \htwo\ rotational states J=3-9.
449: The logarithm
450: of $\rm N_J/(g_J g_s)$ is plotted against $\rm E_J/k_b$, where $\rm N_J$
451: is the
452: beam-averaged column density, $\rm g_J$ is the rotational degeneracy,
453: $\rm g_s$ is the spin degeneracy, and $\rm E_J$ is the energy of the
454: rotational level J. Open squares mark the data points. Blue straight lines
455: show the best fit for a gas component of uniform temperature.
456: The gas properties are given in each panel. The dashed lines in each panel
457: correspond to the same temperature although they differ in the total
458: column density for the orto and para species. Red dashed lines trace the fit
459: to the warm extended component (pedestal).
460: Green filled stars show the best planar C-shock model that
461: accounts for the $J\geq 3$ data points. The parameters of the model
462: (shock velocity $\rm V_s$, hydrogen nuclei density $\rm n_0(H)$ and ortho
463: to para
464: ratio $\rm otp_0$ in the pre-shock gas) and the pixel filling factor ff
465: are given for HH~2E and HH~2D.
466: Below the panels of HH~2E and HH~2D are given the best fit parameters
467: for planar C-shock models.
468: }
469: \clearpage
470:
471: \begin{figure}
472: \epsscale{1.0}
473: %\plotone{fig1.jpg}
474: \caption{}
475: \label{fig1}
476: \end{figure}
477: \clearpage
478:
479: \end{document}
480: