1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: \def \etal {{\it et~al.}}
4: \def \kms{\rm{km}~$\rm{s}^{-1}$}
5: \def \cc{$\rm{cm}^{-3}$}
6: \def \msyr{$M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$}
7: \def \cm{~\rm{cm}}
8: \def \s{~\rm{s}}
9: \def \km{~\rm{km}}
10: \def \kms{$~\rm{km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$}
11: \def \gm{\rm{gm}}
12: \def \K{~\rm{K}}
13: \def \g{~\rm{g}}
14: \def \G{~\rm{G}}
15: \def \AU{~\rm{AU}}
16: \def \erg{~\rm{erg}}
17: \def \yrs{~\rm{yrs}}
18: \def \yr{~\rm{yr}}
19: \def \pc{~\rm{pc}}
20: \def \kpc{~\rm{kpc}}
21: \def \lesssim{\mathrel{<\kern-1.0em\lower0.9ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
22: \def \gtrsim{\mathrel{>\kern-1.0em\lower0.9ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
23:
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \doublespace
28:
29: \title{Nebular vs. Stellar Wind Abundances in NGC 6543}
30:
31: \author{H. Maness}
32: \affil{Department of Physics, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112.
33: MANESS@grinnell.edu}
34:
35: \author{S. D. Vrtilek}
36: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138.
37: svrtilek@cfa.harvard.edu}
38:
39: .
40: \newpage
41: \section{abstract}
42: An early analysis of {\it Chandra} observations of the planetary nebula
43: NGC 6543 suggested that
44: the location and the derived temperature for the X-ray emitting
45: region is inconsistent with the abundances measured for this object
46: \citep{Chu01}.
47: We revisit {\it Chandra} observations of this source (following
48: significant updates to both the reprocessing and extraction software)
49: in order
50: to propose a resolution to this apparent anomaly.
51: Our
52: re-analysis using
53: abundances found from observations in the infrared, optical, and
54: ultraviolet suggests that the location and temperature of the
55: X-ray emission from NGC 6543 is
56: consistent with nebular abundances expected for the source.
57:
58: Planetary nebulae: individual (NGC6543)
59:
60: \clearpage
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63:
64: Over the last several years, sensitive X-ray observations of planetary
65: nebulae by Chandra and XMM-Newton have led to results that both
66: astonish and puzzle astronomers. One such result was presented by Chu
67: et al. (2001) on the Chandra-observed X-ray spectrum of the Cat's Eye
68: nebula, NGC 6543. Chu et al. (2001) found that the X-ray spectrum of
69: NGC 6543 could be adequately fit using stellar wind abundances but not
70: with abundances that had been reported for the nebular material in this
71: object. Specifically, they found that because He and N are expected to be
72: significantly more enhanced in the stellar wind than in the nebular
73: material (Aller \& Czyzk 1983; Pwa, Pottasch, \& Mo 1984; Manchado \&
74: Pottasch 1989; de Koter, Hubeny, Heap, \& Lanz 1996), only models
75: derived from stellar wind abundances would match the observed
76: spectrum. Chu et al. (2001) emphasized, however, that the low
77: temperature they derived for the X-ray emitting material
78: (1.7 X 10$^6$ K) is puzzling since the expected postshock temperature for
79: the fast (1750 km s$^{-1}$) stellar wind of NGC 6543 is of the order of
80: 10$^8$K. They also note that the location of the X-ray emitting gas
81: requires that a
82: significant fraction of the X-ray emitting material be nebular. In this
83: paper,
84: we re-analyze the spectrum on NGC 6543 using updated abundances
85: found for the nebular material in an attempt to resolve this apparent
86: anomaly.
87:
88:
89: \section{Observations}
90:
91: {\it Chandra} observed NGC 6543 for 46.0~ksec (ObsID 630)
92: with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS;
93: Garmire~\etal~1988) as the focal plane instrument.
94: The telescope boresight was positioned
95: near the center of the spectroscopy CCD array
96: (ACIS-S); NGC 6543 was
97: imaged on the
98: central back-illuminated CCD (S3), which provides
99: moderate
100: spectral resolution (E/$\Delta$E) of $\sim$4.3 at 0.5 keV and
101: $\sim$9 at 1.0 keV.
102: Analysis of these data have already appeared in Chu
103: \etal~(2001).
104: Data from the
105: observation have been reprocessed by the Chandra X-ray
106: Center (CXC) subsequent to the publication by Chu
107: \etal~(2001);
108: the analysis presented here
109: was performed on the reprocessed files.
110: Each spectrum was extracted using the
111: {\it Chandra}
112: Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO) software
113: within a region
114: judged to contain all the X-ray flux from the
115: nebula (see Fig. 1).
116: We note that the current extraction (CIAOv2.2.1) reflects upgrades to the
117: calibration system that were made after Chu's paper
118: on this system was published.
119: The extracted events are
120: aspect-corrected, bias-subtracted,
121: energy-calibrated and
122: limited to grade 02346 events (ASCA system).
123: The background count rate
124: as determined from a large,
125: off-source annulus region
126: (30- and 50-pixel radii) was negligible in
127: comparison to the source count rate.
128:
129: \section{Spectral Analysis}
130:
131: Spectra were extracted from the entire nebula
132: and from three regions corresponding to the central elliptical
133: shell, the northern extension, and the southern extension (see Fig. 1).
134: The extractions for the entire nebula and the central region excluded
135: counts from the central point-source. The divisions were made
136: following the regions listed by Chu~\etal~(2001).
137:
138: The extracted spectra were first modeled with the abundances
139: used by \citet{Chu01}:
140: they used abundances reported by \citet{Aller83},
141: \citet{Pwa84},
142: and \citet{Manchado89} for nebular material, and abundances reported
143: by \citet{deKoter96} for the stellar wind.
144: For purposes of comparison, we used both the model
145: used by \citet{Chu01} (VRAYMOND with adopted absorption cross
146: sections from Balucinska-Church and McCammon 1992; hereafter RBM) as well as
147: a VMEKAL model with absorption cross sections adopted from Morrison
148: and McCammon (1983; hereafter VMM).
149: Both RBM and VMM are appropriate for
150: optically thin thermal plasma in ionization equilibrium.
151: When abundance values for elements that are fit by these models
152: are not available we set the abundance to Solar.
153: Abundances were held fixed and only temperature, intervening column
154: density, and normalization were allowed as free parameters.
155: We are unable to reproduce the results of
156: \citet{Chu01}, finding that stellar wind abundances they used modeled the
157: observed X-ray spectra as well as their nebular
158: abundances (Figs. 2 and 3). The abundances and best-fit parameters
159: are listed in Tables 1
160: and 2.
161:
162: We then fit the observed spectra with
163: nebular abundances determined from optical observations by Hyung et al.
164: (2001).
165: Hyung \etal`s abundances, given relative to hydrogen by number, were
166: converted to abundances relative to solar following Grevesse \& Sauval
167: 1998; the converted abundances are listed in Table 1.
168: We again performed two sets of fits: RBM and VMM.
169: Fits using Hyung \etal's abundances produced good results, giving a lower
170: chi-squared value than both the nebular and the stellar wind abundances
171: used by Chu et al. (2001).
172: The temperature did not vary significantly
173: over any of the models but column density decreased by 10 percent for
174: fits using VMM (Fig. 4).
175:
176: Since the Hyung \etal~(2001) abundances were based on
177: observations taken in only one wavelength and sampled only
178: at two bright regions of the nebula, they may not
179: be representative of the entire nebula.
180: We therefore used abundances for the nebula determined by Bernard-Salas
181: \etal~(2003, submitted) from multiple observations in the infrared, optical,
182: and ultraviolet. These provide a better sample of the nebular region and
183: the multiwavelength determination is more robust. However, we note
184: that Bernard-Salas is not yet published
185: and these numbers are subject to small changes
186: (Bernard-Salas and S.R. Pottasch, personal communication).
187: Again, the abundances provided by Bernard-Salas and our best-fit parameters are
188: listed in Tables 1 and 2.
189: The model fits are shown in Figure 5.
190: The similarity between Hyung and Bernard-Salas nebular abundances and
191: the improvement in fits to the data using these abundances give us
192: confidence in our result.
193:
194:
195: We fit the spectra extracted from the central shell
196: and the northern and southern extensions using the same abundances as
197: those adopted for the entire nebula.
198: The main result from the regional fits is that while temperature
199: remains constant over the emitting region, absorption appears
200: to vary significantly.
201: Specifically, the intervening absorption
202: is greater for the southern extension
203: and the central shell than
204: for the northern extension (Table 3).
205: This result is in agreement with the predictions of \citet{Miranda92}
206: and with the work of \citet{Chu01}.
207:
208:
209: \section{Summary/Conclusions}
210:
211: \citet{Chu01} pioneered {\it Chandra} X-ray spectral work on the planetary
212: nebula NGC 6543 and found that models using abundances reported for the
213: stellar wind better fit the observed spectrum than those using
214: abundances reported for the nebula. They concluded that the X-ray
215: emission from this PN arose primarily from stellar wind material but emphasized
216: that this result was troubling when considered with the X-ray temperature derived
217: from their model and with the location of the X-ray emitting gas.
218: In an attempt to resolve
219: this issue, we re-modeled the X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 using
220: abundances reported by Hyung~\etal(2001) and Bernard-Salas~\etal~(Pottasch,
221: personal communication).
222: The resulting
223: models fit our spectra better than either the nebular or the stellar wind
224: models proposed by \citet{Chu01}, suggesting that the X-ray emission
225: from NGC 6543 arises primarily from nebular gas. We point out
226: that our result does not require that diffuse X-ray emission
227: from this PN originate solely from nebular material.
228: Given the quality of the spectrum, a definite separation of nebular and
229: stellar wind abundances cannot be achieved, and in reality,
230: the X-ray emitting material may be
231: some mix of stellar wind and nebular material.
232: Our finding that observed X-ray spectral properties from NGC 6543
233: allow for emission predominantly from nebular material resolves
234: the low temperature anomaly identified by \citet{Chu01}.
235:
236: HM was supported by the NSF REU
237: program at SAO. SDV was supported in part by
238: NASA Grant NAG5-6711.
239:
240: \begin{thebibliography}{}
241: \bibitem[Aller \& Czyzak(1983)]{Aller83} Aller, L.~H.~\&
242: Czyzak, S.~J.\ 1983, \apjs, 51, 211
243: \bibitem[Balucinska-Church \& McCammon(1992)]{Balucinska92}
244: Balucinska-Church, M.~\& McCammon, D.\ 1992, \apj, 400, 699
245: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas, Pottasch, Wesselius, \& Feibelman(2003)]
246: {Bernard-Salas03a} Bernard-Salas, J., Pottasch, S.~R., Wesslelius,
247: P.~R., \& Feibelman, W.~A.\ 2003, \aap, submitted
248: \bibitem [Bernard-Salas, Pottasch, Wesselius, \& Feibelman(2003)]
249: {Bernard-Salas03b} Bernard-Salas, J., Pottasch, S.~R., Wesslelius,
250: P.~R., \& Feibelman, W.~A.\ 2003, personal communication
251: \bibitem[Chu et al.(2001)]{Chu01} Chu, Y., Guerrero, M.,
252: Gruendl, R.~A., Williams, R.~M., \& Kaler, J.~B.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L69
253: \bibitem[de Koter, Hubeny, Heap, \& Lanz(1996)]{deKoter96} de
254: Koter, A., Hubeny, I., Heap, S.~R., \& Lanz, T.\ 1996, ASP Conf.~Ser.~96:
255: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP)
256: \bibitem[Garmire et al. (1988)]{Gar88} Garmire, G.P., Nousek, J., Burrows, D.,
257: Ricker, G., Bautz, M.,Doty, J., Collins, S., Janesick, J. \ 1988 SPIE, 982, 123
258: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{Grev98} Grevesse, N.~\&
259: Sauval, A.J.\ 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
260: \bibitem[Hyung et al. (2001)]{Hyu01} Hyung, S., Mellema, G.,
261: Lee, S.-J. \& Kim, H.\ 2001, \aap, 378, 587
262: Hydrogen Deficient Stars, 141
263: \bibitem[Manchado \& Pottasch(1989)]{Manchado89} Manchado, A.~\&
264: Pottasch, S.~R.\ 1989, \aap, 222, 219
265: \bibitem[Miranda \& Solf(1992)]{Miranda92} Miranda, L.~F.~\&
266: Solf, J.\ 1992, \aap, 260, 397
267: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon (1983)]{MMc83} Morrison, R. \& McCammon, D.\ 1983,
268: \apj, 270, 119
269: \bibitem[Pwa, Pottasch, \& Mo(1984)]{Pwa84} Pwa, T.~H.,
270: Pottasch, S.~R., \& Mo, J.~E.\ 1984, \aap, 139, L1
271: \end{thebibliography}
272:
273: \clearpage
274: \begin{figure}
275: \centering
276: \scalebox{0.5}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{figure1.ps}}}
277: \caption{X-ray image of NGC 6543 with extracted regions overlaid.
278: The small circle surrounds the central point source; the brightest pixel
279: in the center has 23 cts.
280: The rectangles are the northern, central, and southern regions.
281: The innermost oval (enclosing the rectangles) is the region
282: used for the whole nebula.
283: The region between the two outer ovals was used to determine the background.
284: \label{regions_6543}}
285: \end{figure}
286:
287: \clearpage
288: \begin{figure}
289: \centering
290: \scalebox{0.4}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{figure2.ps}}}
291: \caption{X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 with Chu stellar model
292: overlaid.
293: \label{chu_stl_6543}}
294: \end{figure}
295:
296: \clearpage
297: \begin{figure}
298: \centering
299: \scalebox{0.4}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{figure3.ps}}}
300: \caption{X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 with Chu nebular model
301: overlaid.
302: \label{chu_neb_6543}}
303: \end{figure}
304:
305: \clearpage
306: \begin{figure}
307: \centering
308: \scalebox{0.4}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{figure4.ps}}}
309: \caption{X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 with Hyung nebular model
310: overlaid.
311: \label{hyung_neb_6543}}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: \clearpage
315: \begin{figure}
316: \centering
317: \scalebox{0.4}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{figure5.ps}}}
318: \caption{X-ray spectrum of NGC 6543 with Bernard-Salas nebular model
319: overlaid.
320: \label{bs_neb_6543}}
321: \end{figure}
322:
323: \clearpage
324: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
325: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
326: \tablecolumns{9}
327: \tablewidth{0pt}
328: \tablecaption{Abundances (relative to Solar) used to fit NGC 6543 X-ray Spectra}
329: \tablehead{\colhead{Element}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Nebular\tablenotemark{1}}
330: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Stellar\tablenotemark{1}}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyung Nebular\tablenotemark{2}}&\multicolumn{2}
331: {c}{Bernard-Salas Nebular\tablenotemark{3}}}
332: \startdata
333: He&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.13}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{60}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.3}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}\\
334: C&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.63}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.76}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.69$\pm0.2$}\\
335: N&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.53}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{3}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.44}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{3.0$\pm1.1$}\\
336: O&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.66}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.70}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.78$\pm0.2$}\\
337: Ne&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.14}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.83}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.17$\pm0.4$}\\
338: Si&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.23}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}\\
339: S&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.37}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{0.56$\pm0.2$}\\
340: Ar&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.2}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{1.55$\pm0.5$}\\
341: \enddata
342: \tablenotetext{1}{Chu~\etal~2001.}
343: \tablenotetext{2}{Hyung~\etal~2001.}
344: \tablenotetext{3}{Bernard-Salas~\etal~2003, submitted.}
345: \end{deluxetable}
346: \
347:
348: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
349: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
350: \tablecolumns{9}
351: \tablewidth{0pt}
352: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters from fits to NGC 6543 Whole Nebula sans Point Source}
353: \startdata
354: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Nebular}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Stellar}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyung Nebular}&\multicolumn{2}
355: {c}{Bernard-Salas Nebular}}\\
356: &RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM\\
357: N$_H$(cm$^{-2})$&9.8e20$\pm.007$&7.2e20$\pm.006$&8.4e20$\pm0.007$&7.8e20$\pm.007$e20&5.6$\pm0.6$e20&4.2$\pm0.6$e20&5.3$\pm0.6$e20&4.5$\pm0.5$e20\\
358: kT(keV)&0.12$\pm$.002&0.14$\pm$0.2&0.14$\pm$0.002&0.15$\pm$0.003&0.14$\pm.002$&0.15$\pm$0.002&0.15$\pm$0.002&0.15$\pm$0.002\\
359: $\chi^2_{\nu}$&1.3 &1.6&1.6&1.4&1.2&1.2&1.16&1.07\\\centering
360: \enddata
361: \end{deluxetable}
362: \
363:
364: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
365: \centering
366: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.06in}
367: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
368: \tablecolumns{9}
369: \tablewidth{0pt}
370: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters from fits to NGC 6543 Selected Regions}
371: \startdata
372: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Nebular}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Chu Stellar}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyung Nebular}&\multicolumn{2}
373: {c}{Bernard-Salas Nebular}}\\
374: &RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM&RBM&VMM\\
375: NE N$_H$(cm$^{-2})$&6.2e20$\pm4$&4.6e20$\pm3$&5.4e20$\pm3$&4.7e20$\pm3$e20&2.6e20
376: $\pm3$&1.6$\pm1.5$e20&2.7$\pm2$e20&2.1$\pm2$e20\\
377: SE N$_H$(cm$^{-2})$&11.8e20$\pm10$&9.6e20$\pm10$&14.1e20$\pm6$&11.4e20$\pm6$e20&8.9
378: $\pm7$e20&6.7$\pm6$e20&7.2$\pm7$e20&5.9$\pm4$e20\\
379: CE N$_H$(cm$^{-2})$&16.4e20$\pm10$&12.6e20$\pm10$&11.3e20$\pm9$&13.8e20$\pm7$e20&
380: 8.0$\pm7$e20&6.1$\pm6$e20&6.9$\pm4$e20&5.6$\pm4$e20\\
381: NE kT(keV)&0.13$\pm$.02&0.14$\pm$0.03&0.15$\pm$0.02&0.16$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm.02$&0.15$\pm$0.0
382: 2&0.15$\pm$0.02&0.16$\pm$0.02\\
383: SE kT(keV)&0.13$\pm$.04&0.14$\pm$0.04&0.14$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm.03$&0.15$\pm$0.0
384: 3&0.15$\pm$0.03&0.15$\pm$0.02\\
385: CE kT(keV)&0.11$\pm$.03&0.11$\pm$0.04&0.14$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm$0.02&0.14$\pm.03$&0.14$\pm$0.0
386: 4&0.14$\pm$0.02&0.15$\pm$0.02\\
387: \enddata
388: \end{deluxetable}
389:
390: \end{document}
391: