1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint,usegraphicx]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\aj{AJ}
4: \def\apj{ApJ}
5: \def\apjl{ApJ}
6: \def\apjs{ApJS}
7: \def\mnras{MNRAS}
8: \def\araa{ARA\&A}
9: \def\pasp{PASP}
10: \def\aap{A\&A}
11: \def\aapl{A\&A}
12: \def\aaps{A\&AS}
13: \newcommand\kms{km~s$^{-1}$}
14: \newcommand\etal{{et~al.}}
15: \newcommand\msun{\ifmmode{\hbox{M$_\odot$}}\else{M$_\odot$}\fi}
16: \newcommand{\reduceme}{\mbox{R\raisebox{-0.35ex}{E}D%
17: \hspace{-0.05em}\raisebox{0.85ex}{uc}\hspace{-0.90em}%
18: \raisebox{-.35ex}{{m}}\hspace{0.05em}E}}
19:
20: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
21: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
22:
23: %\slugcomment{}
24:
25: \shorttitle{C,N abundances in cluster ellipticals}
26: \shortauthors{S\'{a}nchez--Bl\'{a}zquez et al.}
27:
28: %\received{2003 April 23}
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \title{Differences in carbon and nitrogen abundances between field and cluster early-type
32: galaxies}
33:
34: \author{S\'{a}nchez--Bl\'{a}zquez P., Gorgas J., Cardiel N.\altaffilmark{1} and Cenarro J.}
35: \affil{Departamento de Astrof\'{\i}sica, Facultad de F\'{\i}sicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain}
36: \email{pat@astrax.fis.ucm.es}
37: \author{Gonz\'{a}lez J.J.}
38: \affil{Inst. de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'{e}xico, Apdo-Postal 70-264, M\'exico D.F, M\'exico}
39: \altaffiltext{1}{Also at Calar Alto Observatory, CAHA, Apdo. 511, 04044, Almer\'{\i}a, Spain}
40:
41: \clearpage
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: Central line-strength indices were measured in the blue spectral region
45: for a sample of 98 early-type galaxies in different environments.
46: For most indices (Mgb and $\langle$Fe$\rangle$ in particular) ellipticals in rich clusters
47: and in low-density regions follow the same index-sigma relations.
48: However, striking spectral differences between field ellipticals and
49: their counterparts in the central region of the Coma cluster are found for
50: the first time, with galaxies in the denser environment showing
51: significantly lower C4668 and CN$_{2}$ absorption strengths. The most
52: convincing interpretation of these results is a difference in abundance
53: ratios, arising from a distinct star formation and chemical enrichment
54: histories of galaxies in different environments. An scenario in which
55: elliptical galaxies in clusters are fully assembled at earlier stages
56: than their low-density counterparts is discussed.
57:
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \keywords{galaxies: abundances --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: clusters --- galaxies: formation ---
61: galaxies: stellar content}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64:
65: Despite the observational and theoretical efforts of the last decades, the
66: evolutionary status of early-type galaxies is still an unsolved problem. The
67: stellar populations of nearby ellipticals preserve a record of their formation
68: and evolution. In particular, the study of their element abundance ratios
69: should be a powerful discriminant between different star formation histories
70: (e.g. \citealt{W98}). However, this last approach is still at its infancy. The
71: pioneering works of late 1970s already revealed that abundance ratios in
72: early-type galaxies are often non-solar (\citealt{Ocon76}; \citealt{Pet76}).
73: Since then, several studies have provided compelling evidence of Mg/Fe
74: overabundances in massive ellipticals as compared with the solar ratio
75: (\citealt{b42}; \citealt{b41}; \citealt{b60}), which have been interpreted in
76: the light of several possible scenarios based on the understanding that Mg is mainly produced in
77: type II supernovae (\citealt{Fab92}; \citealt{b42}; \citealt{Mat94}). However, and in contrast with the above findings, another
78: $alpha$ element, namely Ca, seems to be underabundant in ellipticals
79: (\citealt{Ocon76}; \citealt{Sag02}; \citealt{Cen03}; \citealt{Tho03}), challenging
80: current chemical evolution models (\citealt{Mat94}; \citealt{Moll00}).
81:
82: Several authors (\citealt{W98};\citealt{b37}) have also noted a strengthening
83: in other absorption line-strengths, in particular in the IDS/Lick C4668 and
84: CN$_{2}$ indices, when compared with stellar population models
85: predictions. The variations of these two indices are mainly driven by C and N
86: (in the case of CN) abundances (\citealt{Tri95}), which could suggest a
87: possible enhancement of these two elements relative to Fe when compared with
88: the solar values. In contrast with Mg, C and N are mainly produced in low- and
89: intermediate-mass stars (\citealt{Ren81}; \citealt{Chia03}, although there are
90: recent suggestions that most of the C should come from massive stars). During
91: the AGB phase, these stars eject into the ISM significant amounts of $^{4}$He,
92: $^{12}$C, $^{13}$C and $^{14}$N, enriching the medium from which new stars
93: will be formed. Therefore, it seems difficult to simultaneously reproduce the
94: abundances of all these elements with a simple chemical evolution scenario.
95:
96: The problem of C and N abundances has been more thoroughly studied in the
97: field of globular clusters. An interesting puzzling problem is the
98: existence of a CN dichotomy in Galactic and M31 globular clusters
99: (\citealt{b15}). Although this is a controversial issue, recent works
100: (\citealt{Har03}) tend to favor the scenarios of different abundances in the
101: parental clouds against the ones that predict abundance changes produced
102: internally by the evolution of the stars (see \citealt{Can98} for a review).
103:
104: Given the expected sensitivities of relative abundances to the star formation
105: history of ellipticals, their study in galaxies within different environments
106: should help to discriminate between different formation and evolution models.
107: For instance, hierarchical scenarios predict that ellipticals in rich clusters
108: assembled completely at high redshift ({\it z}$>$3), whereas field ellipticals
109: may have experienced an elapsed and more complex star formation history
110: (\citealt{Kauff98}). However, very little is known about the dependence of the
111: relative abundances on environment. One piece of information is that there is
112: no difference in the [Mg/Fe] ratio between cluster and field elliptical
113: galaxies (\citealt{Jor99}; \citealt{Kun02}). In this letter, we study the
114: behaviour of several Lick/IDS indices (see \citealt{Worea94} for definition) in a sample of low and
115: high density environment galaxies (LDEG and HDEG respectively) and,
116: surprisingly, we do find systematic differences in the strength of C and CN
117: features.
118:
119: \section{Observations and data analysis}
120:
121: \subsection{Observations}
122:
123: Long--slit spectra of 98 early--type galaxies in different environments were
124: taken in four observing runs with two different telescopes. The sample
125: comprises 59 galaxies from the field and the Virgo cluster (LDEG), and 34 galaxies
126: from the central region of the Coma cluster (HDEG), spanning a wide range of
127: absolute magnitudes ($-22.5<M_{\rm B}<-16.5$, using $H_0 =
128: 75$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$), and central velocity dispersions $40< \sigma <
129: 400$~km~s$^{-1}$ (from dwarf ellipticals, in Virgo and Coma, to giant galaxies).
130:
131: In the first two runs (1998 January and 1999 August) we used the 3.5m
132: telescope at Calar Alto Observatory (Almer\'{\i}a, Spain), employing the Twin
133: Spectrograph. The observations of the third and fourth runs (1999 March and
134: 2001 April) were carried out with the 4.2m WHT at the Roque de los Muchachos
135: Observatory (La Palma, Spain) using the ISIS spectrograph. Spectral
136: resolutions range from 2.6~\AA\ and 4.0~\AA\ (FWHM) for LDEG to 8.6~\AA\
137: for HDEG, in a spectral range $\lambda\lambda 3600$--5400~\AA.
138: Exposures times of 1200--3600 secs per galaxy allowed us to obtain central
139: spectra with signal-to-noise ($S/N$) ratios (per \AA) ranging from 25 to 250. We
140: also observed several galaxies in common between runs to ensure that the
141: measurements were in the same system. $85$ stars from the IDS/Lick
142: library were included to transform the measured line-strength indices to the Lick system.
143:
144: Standard data reduction procedures (flat-fielding, cosmic ray removal,
145: wavelength calibration, sky subtraction and fluxing) were performed with
146: {\reduceme} (\citealt{Car99}), which allowed a parallel treatment of data and
147: error frames and provided an associated error file for each individual data
148: spectrum.
149:
150: \subsection{Velocity dispersion and line-strength indices}
151:
152: For each galaxy, central spectra were extracted by coadding within a
153: standard metric aperture size corresponding to 4 arcsec projected at the
154: distance of the Coma cluster (simulating in this way a fixed linear
155: aperture of length 1.8 kpc in all the galaxies). Velocity dispersions were determined
156: using the MOVEL and OPTEMA
157: algorithms described in \citet{G93}. We measured the Lick/IDS line-strengths
158: indices, although only CN$_{2}$, Mgb, C4668 and $<$Fe$>$ are presented here
159: (the rest of the indices, with a more detailed explanation of data handling,
160: will be presented in a forthcoming paper). All the indices were transformed to
161: the Lick spectrophotometric system using the observed stars and following the
162: prescriptions in J. Gorgas, P. Jablonka, \& P. Goudfrooij (2003, in preparation); see
163: also \citet{b33}. Using galaxies in common with \citet{b34} and with repeated
164: observations between runs, we double-checked that there are no systematic
165: errors in the indices of galaxies observed in different runs. All the indices
166: presented in this work are transformed into magnitudes, following
167: \citet{KunPhD}: $I'({\rm mag})=-2.5\log(1-I({\rm \AA})/\Delta\lambda)$, where
168: $\Delta\lambda$ is the width of the index bandpass.
169:
170: \subsection{Results}
171:
172: In Fig.~\ref{todas.sigma.letter} we present the CN$_{2}$, C4668$'$,
173: Mgb$'$, and $\langle$Fe$\rangle'$ indices versus velocity dispersion ($\sigma$) for
174: the 98 galaxies of the sample. The spectra of three dwarf galaxies from the
175: Coma sample did not have enough $S/N$ to derive a reliable
176: measurement of $\sigma$ and a typical value of 40~km~s$^{-1}$ was assumed.
177: Also, for the rest of the galaxies with $\sigma<60$~km~s$^{-1}$, we adopted
178: $\sigma$ values from \citet{b50} and \citet{Guz03}.
179: It is apparent from this figure that galaxies located in low
180: and high density environments show systematic differences in C4668$'$ and
181: CN$_{2}$, being the indices in HDEG systematically lower than in LDEGs. On the
182: other hand, both galaxy subsamples seem to follow similar relationships in the
183: $\langle$Fe$\rangle'$ and Mgb$'$ versus $\sigma$ diagrams.
184:
185:
186: To quantify the possible systematic differences, we have performed a linear
187: least-square fit to the LDEG subsample, and have measured the mean offsets
188: (weighting with errors) of the Coma galaxies (HDEG) from the fits. These
189: differences and their errors are indicated within each panel, confirming the
190: high significance of the systematic offsets in CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$.
191:
192: These systematic differences are also visible directly in the spectra of the
193: galaxies. For illustration, Fig.~\ref{espectro-figure} shows the coadded
194: spectra of LDEG (thin line) and HDEG (thick line) in the range
195: $150<\sigma<250$~km~s$^{-1}$, previously shifted to the same radial velocity
196: and broadened to the maximum $\sigma$. The $S/N$ ratios of the two combined
197: spectra are above 300. It is evident that the offsets found in
198: Fig.~\ref{todas.sigma.letter} are due to real enhancements of the CN band at
199: $\lambda4177$~\AA\ and the C$_{2}$ Swan band at 4735\AA\ in LDEG compared to
200: HDEG. Note that this effect is also quite remarkable in the CN band around
201: $\lambda3865$~\AA\ (not included in the Lick system).
202:
203:
204: \section{Discussion}
205:
206:
207: Prior to interpret the systematic differences in CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$ as
208: variations on elements abundances, and since the indices are also sensitive to
209: other physical parameters, we have explored further possibilities:
210:
211: (1) Given the gravity dependences of the CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$ indices
212: (both are stronger in giant than in dwarf stars;
213: \citealt{Worea94}), a decrease in the giant/dwarf ratio in HDEG (with respect
214: to LDEG) would lead to lower index values. Using the models by Vazdekis et al. (1996),
215: we have checked that a change in the exponent of the IMF from
216: 0.80 to 2.80 would decrease CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$ by 0.033 and 0.009 mag
217: respectively, while the expected changes in Mgb$'$ and $<$Fe$>$ would be of
218: 0.005 and 0.003 in the opposite sense (assuming an age of 10~Gyr and solar
219: metallicity). These predictions are marginally consistent with our results
220: (note that the above offsets for Mgb$'$ and $<$Fe$>$ are compatible with the
221: measurements within the uncertainties),
222: thus we cannot reject this possibility. However, this result is in
223: contradiction with other studies (\citealt{b36}) which suggest a decrease in the
224: giant/dwarf ratio in LDEG compared to HDEG, and would imply important changes
225: in other observables. Measurements of the Ca triplet in the near-infrared
226: (with a high sensitivity to the IMF; see \citealt{Cen03}) should help to
227: discard or confirm this scenario.
228:
229: (2) A difference in (luminosity-weighted) mean age between HDEG and LDEG could
230: also introduce systematic offsets in CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$ between both galaxy
231: samples. Under this scenario, and using the models by V96, the observed
232: offsets could be accounted for if HDEG were
233: about 8 Gyr younger than LDEG. This possibility can be rejected since it would imply
234: a decrease in Mgb$'$ and $<$Fe$>$ of 0.026 and 0.014 in HDEG compared with
235: LDEG, which is not observed. Furthermore, it contradicts previous findings which
236: suggest that HDEG are, in any case, older than LDEG (\citealt{Kun02}).
237:
238:
239:
240: Thus, the most plausible explanation of our results is that variations in the
241: relative abundances of C and N with respect to Mg and Fe are responsible for
242: the observed offsets between galaxies in different
243: environments. Fig.~\ref{index-index} compares the observed CN$_{2}$ and
244: C4668$'$ with the predictions of stellar population models. This figure
245: clearly shows that the previously found overabundances of C and N only stand for LDEG, while
246: HDEG tend to exhibit relative abundances closer to the solar partition.
247:
248: The C4668$'$ index is extremely sensitive to carbon changes, so little
249: variations in carbon abundance can change this index dramatically
250: (\citealt{Tri95}). However, the variations of CN are mostly controlled by N,
251: because extra C is readily incorporated into CO but extra N makes more CN
252: molecules. Therefore, a change in both C and N abundances is required to
253: explain our results. Besides, if extra carbon is easily incorporated into CO,
254: one should detect an enhancement in the strength of the CO bands in LDEG
255: compared to HDEG. This effect has indeed been found by \citet{Mob96}
256: comparing the CO band at 2.3$\mu$m in galaxies from the field and from the
257: Pisces and Abell~2634 clusters. They interpreted this difference as an
258: evidence of intermediate-age stellar population in LDEG (through a major
259: contribution of AGB stars). Although we do not discard a larger contribution
260: of younger populations in LDEG compared to HDEG, our results in the blue
261: spectral range imply that their observations can be solely explained by a
262: relative abundance difference. In any case, the observed offsets can not be
263: due to an age effect alone (see above).
264:
265: The most plausible scenario to explain the differences in relative abundances
266: is the one in which LDEG and HDEG have experienced different star formation
267: histories. In particular, since the ISM is progressively enriched in C and N by
268: stars of low and intermediate mass stars, HDEG should have been fully assembled
269: before the massive release of these elements. The hierarchical clustering
270: paradigm currently predicts that galaxies in
271: clusters formed at different epochs than LDEGs. If the time elapsed between the
272: assembling of the former and the later is enough to permit the C and N
273: enrichment of the ISM of the pre-merging building blocks in LDEG, the stars
274: formed in these galaxies during the merging events will be C and N
275: enhanced. The constancy of the iron-peak elements could be understood if, in
276: both environments, the mergers take place before type-I SN can significantly
277: pollute the ISM of the pre-merging blocks. Additionally, HDEG could have
278: experienced a truncated star formation and chemical enrichment history
279: compared to a more continuous time-extended history for their counterparts in
280: low density environments. However, under this hypothesis, there should be an
281: increase of magnesium (produced by type-II SN) in LDEG which is not
282: detected. One way to understand the constancy of the Mgb$'$ index could be to
283: invoke the IMF-metallicity relationship suggested by \citet{Cen03}, in
284: which the succesive episodes of star formation in LDEG would take place with
285: lower giant-to-dwarf ratios.
286:
287: To conclude, we have noted for the first time a systematic difference in the
288: element abundance ratios of galaxies situated in different environments. These
289: differences impose strong constraints to models of chemical evolution and
290: galaxy formation. It is clear that more work is still needed to completely
291: understand the causes of the differences. In particular, it would be very
292: interesting to compare the CN$_{2}$ and C4668' indices between the central
293: regions and the outskirts of the Coma cluster, where \citet{Mob00} found
294: differences in the strength of the near-IR CO molecule. Also, the detailed
295: study of other dense clusters is highly needed to confirm whether this effect
296: is particular of the Coma cluster.
297:
298:
299: \section*{Acknowledgments}
300: We are indebted to R. Guzm\'{a}n for providing us with a catalogue of dwarf
301: elliptical galaxies in the Coma cluster.
302: The WHT is operated on the island of La Palma by the Royal Greenwich Observatory at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the
303: Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias. The Calar Alto Observatory is operated jointly by the Max-Planck-Institute f\"{u}r Astronomie,
304: Heidelberg, and the Spanish Comisi\'{o}n Nacional de Astronom\'{\i}a. This
305: work was supported by the Spanish research project No.AYA2000-977.
306:
307: \clearpage
308:
309: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
310: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burstein et al.}{1984}]{b15} Burstein, D., Faber, S., Gaskell, C. M., \& Krumm, N. 1984, ApJ, 287, 586
311: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cannon et al.}{1998}]{Can98}Cannon, R. D., Croke, B. F. W., Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E, \& Stathakis, R. A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 601
312: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cardiel}{1999}]{Car99} Cardiel, N. 1999, PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense, Madrid
313: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cenarro et al.}{2003}]{Cen03} Cenarro, A. J., Gorgas, J., Vazdekis, A., Cardiel, N., \& Peletier, R. F. 2003, MNRAS, 339, L12
314: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chiappini, Romano, \& Matteucci}{2003}]{Chia03} Chiappini, C., Romano, D., \& Matteucci, F. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 63
315: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Faber, Worthey, \& Gonz\'{a}lez}{1992}]{Fab92} Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., \& Gonz\'{a}lez, J. J. 1992, in IAU Symp.
316: 149, Stellar Populations of Galaxies, ed. B . Barbuy ,\& A. Renzini (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 255
317: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gonz\'alez}{1993}]{G93} Gonz\'{a}lez, J. J. 1993, PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
318: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Guzm\'{a}n et al.}{2003}]{Guz03} Guzm\'{a}n, R., Graham, A., Matkovic, A., Vass, I., Gorgas, J., \& Cardiel, N. 2003,
319: preprint (astro-ph/0303390)
320: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Harbeck, Smith, \& Grebel}{2003}]{Har03} Harbeck, D., Smith, G., \& Grebel, E. 2003, AJ, 125, 197
321: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{J{\o}rgensen}{1999}]{Jor99} J{\o}rgensen I. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 607
322: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann \& Charlot}{1998}]{Kauff98} Kauffmann, G., \& Charlot, S. 1998, MNRAS, 294, 705
323: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kuntschner}{1989}]{KunPhD} Kuntschner, H. 1989, PhD thesis, University of Durham, UK.
324: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kuntschner et al.}{2002}]{Kun02} Kuntschner, H., Smith, R., Colles, M., Davies, R., Kaldare, R., \& Vazdekis, A. 2002, MNRAS, 337,172
325: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Matteucci}{1994}]{Mat94}Matteucci, F. 1994, \aap, 288, 57
326: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mobasher \& James}{1996}]{Mob96}Mobasher, B., \& James, P. A. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 895
327: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mobasher \& James}{2000}]{Mob00} Mobasher, B., \& James, P. A. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 507
328: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Moll\'{a} \& Garc\'{\i}a--Vargas} {2000}]{Moll00} Moll\'{a}, M., \& Garc\'{\i}a--Vargas, M. L. 2000, A\&A, 359, 18
329: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{O'Connell}{1976}]{Ocon76} O'Connell, R. W. 1976, ApJ, 206, 370
330: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pedraz et al.}{2002}] {b50}Pedraz, S., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., S\'{a}nchez--Bl\'{a}zquez, P., \& Guzm\'{a}n, R. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 59
331: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Peletier}{1989}]{b41} Peletier, R. F. 1989 PhD thesis, Univ. of Groningen
332: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Peterson}{1976}]{Pet76} Peterson, R. C. 1976, ApJ, 210, L123
333: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Renzini \& Voli}{1981}]{Ren81} Renzini, A., \& Voli, M. 1981, A\&A, 94, 175
334: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rose et al.}{1994}]{b36} Rose, J. A., Bower, R., Caldwell, N., Ellis, R., Sharples, R. M., \& Teague, P. 1994, AJ, 108, 205
335: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Saglia et al.}{2002}]{Sag02} Saglia, R. P., Maraston, C., Thomas, D., Bender, R., \& Colles, M. 2002, ApJ, 579, L13
336: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Thomas, Maraston, \& Bender}{2003}]{Tho03} Thomas, D., Maraston, C., \& Bender, R. 2003, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0303615)
337: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Trager}{1997}] {b34} Trager, S. C. 1997, PhD tehsis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
338: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tripicco \& Bell}{1995}]{Tri95}Tripicco, M. J., \& Bell, R. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 3035
339: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vazdekis et al.}{1996}]{b51} Vazdekis, A., Casuso, E., Peletier, R. F., \& Beckman, E. 1996, ApJS, 106, 307
340: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vazdekis et al.}{1997}]{b60} Vazdekis, A., Peletier, R. F., Beckman, J.E \& Casuso, E. 1997, ApJS, 111, 203
341: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vazdekis et al.}{2001}]{b37} Vazdekis, A., Kuntschner, H., Davies, R., Arimoto, N., Nakamura, O., \& Peletier, R. 2001, ApJ, 551, 127
342: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Worthey}{1998}]{W98} Worthey, G. 1998, PASP, 110, 888
343: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Worthey \& Ottaviani}{1997}]{b33} Worthey, G., \& Ottaviani, D. L. 1997, ApJS, 111, 377.
344: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Worthey, Faber, \& Gonz\'{a}lez}{1992}]{b42} Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., \& Gonz\'{a}lez, J. J. 1992, ApJ, 398, 69
345: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Worthey et al.}{1994}]{Worea94} Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., Gonz\'{a}lez, J. J., \& Burstein, D. 1994, ApJS, 94, 687
346:
347: \end{thebibliography}
348:
349: \clearpage
350: \begin{figure}
351: \rotatebox{-90}{
352: \plotone{f1.ps}}
353: \figcaption{Relations of the line-strength indices analyzed in this paper with
354: central velocity dispersion for HDEG and LDEG. LDEG are represented with open
355: symbols whereas filled symbols correspond to galaxies from the Coma
356: cluster. Dwarfs ellipticals are plotted with triangles, S0 with squares and E
357: galaxies with circles. Lines represent error-weighted least-squares linear
358: fits to the LDEG subsample. Typical errors in the indices and $\sigma$'s are
359: included at the bottom-left of each panel. Labels indicate the mean offsets,
360: and their corresponding errors, of the HDEG with respect to the fits.
361: \label{todas.sigma.letter}}
362: \end{figure}
363:
364: \begin{figure}
365: \rotatebox{-90}{
366: \epsscale{0.7}
367: \plotone{f2.ps}}
368: \figcaption{Coadded spectra for LDEG and HDEG, represented with thin and thick
369: lines respectively, in our spectral range. See text for details. The position
370: of the CN band around $\lambda4177$~\AA, and the central bandpasses of the
371: CN$_{2}$ and C4668$'$ indices are indicated. Besides these bands, a very consistent
372: difference in the CN violet system (3850-3890 \AA) is also evident.
373: \label{espectro-figure}}
374: \end{figure}
375:
376: \begin{figure}
377: \rotatebox{-90}{
378: \epsscale{0.7}
379: \plotone{f3.ps}}
380: \figcaption{C4668$'$ line-strengths versus CN$_{2}$ for the complete samples of
381: HDEG and LDEG. Overplotted are models by Vazdekis (1996). Lines of constant
382: [Fe/H]= -1.68,-0.68,-0.38, 0.0, +0.2 are shown by solid lines. Dashed lines represent
383: models of constant ages, from 1 Gyr to 17.78 Gyr, increasing from
384: left to right. Symbols are the same as in Fig.~\ref{todas.sigma.letter}.
385: \label{index-index}}
386: \end{figure}
387: \end{document}
388: