1: \documentstyle[emulateapj,10pt,apjfonts,psfig]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[aasms4,psfig]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[aaspp4,12pt,psfig]{article}
4:
5: \def\snr{B0453--685}
6: \def\cxo{{\em Chandra}}
7:
8: \newcommand\HI{H\,{\sc i}}
9: \newcommand\HII{H\,{\sc ii}}
10: \def\kms{km~s$^{-1}$}
11: \def\etal{{\rm et~al.\ }}
12:
13: \lefthead{GAENSLER ET AL.}
14: \righthead{PULSAR WIND NEBULA IN THE LMC}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: \title{Discovery of a New Pulsar Wind Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud}
18: %\submitted{ }
19: \author{B. M. Gaensler\altaffilmark{1},
20: S. P. Hendrick\altaffilmark{2},
21: S. P. Reynolds\altaffilmark{1, 2} and K. J. Borkowski\altaffilmark{2}}
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian
23: Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street MS-6, Cambridge, MA 02138;
24: bgaensler@cfa.harvard.edu}
25: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
26: 27695}
27: %; sphendri@unity.ncsu.edu, steve\_reynolds@ncsu.edu, kborkow@unity.ncsu.edu}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30:
31: We present new high-resolution radio and X-ray observations of the
32: supernova remnant (SNR) \snr\ in the Large Magellanic Cloud, carried out
33: with the Australia Telescope Compact Array and the {\em Chandra X-ray
34: Observatory}\ respectively. Embedded in the SNR shell is a compact
35: central nebula producing both flat-spectrum polarized radio emission
36: and non-thermal X-rays; we identify this source as a pulsar wind nebula (PWN)
37: powered by an unseen central neutron star.
38: We present a new approach by which
39: the properties of a SNR and PWN can be used to infer
40: upper limits on the initial spin period and surface magnetic
41: field of the unseen pulsar, and conclude that this star was an initial
42: rapid rotator with current properties similar
43: to those of the Vela pulsar. As is the case for other similarly-aged
44: sources, there is currently an interaction taking place between the PWN
45: and the SNR's reverse shock.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{
50: ISM: individual (\snr) ---
51: supernova remnants ---
52: Magellanic Clouds}
53:
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: The Magellanic Clouds are ideal regions for studying supernova remnants
58: (SNRs), the known distance and low extinction
59: obviating many of the frustrations associated with studying Galactic
60: SNRs. While this has proved useful in studying the shell emission
61: produced by the interaction of SNRs with the ambient medium,
62: just two Magellanic SNRs, B0540--693 (\cite{msk93}) and N157B
63: (\cite{wgcd01}), are known to harbor a young energetic pulsar and its
64: surrounding pulsar wind nebula (PWN). The lack of other PWNe in the
65: Magellanic Clouds is likely due to a lack of spatial resolution
66: --- such resolution is only now being applied to Magellanic SNRs in both
67: the radio and X-ray bands, and so the prospects are good for identifying
68: new ``composite'' SNRs, containing both outer shells and central PWNe.
69: Such sources are of particular interest, as the shell and PWN together
70: provide unique constraints on the properties of the system.
71:
72: We here present data which demonstrate that \snr\ in the
73: LMC is a composite SNR. This {\em Letter}\ primarily discusses
74: the central PWN; interpretation of the
75: surrounding shell will be the focus of a subsequent paper (\cite{hen03}).
76:
77: \section{Observations and Results}
78:
79: Radio observations of \snr\ were carried out with the Australia
80: Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). Observations were made simultaneously
81: at 1.4 and 2.4~GHz with a bandwidth of 128~MHz at each frequency,
82: using the 1.5G\footnote{1.5G is a non-standard ATCA configuration, and
83: has successive spacings between the six antennas of 30.6, 535.7, 306.1,
84: 413.3 and 3015.3~meters.} and 6.0C configurations on 2002 Jul 23
85: and 2002 Aug 26 respectively. A 38.6-ks X-ray observation of the same field
86: was carried out using the ACIS-S3 detector of the {\em
87: Chandra X-ray Observatory}\ on 2001~Dec~18.
88:
89: For each radio observation, the time on source was $\sim$11~hr.
90: Antenna gains and polarization leakages were calibrated using
91: observations of PKS~B0252--712, while the flux density scale was tied
92: to PKS~B1934--638. The radio data were edited, calibrated and
93: imaged using standard techniques;\footnote{See {\tt
94: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/computing/software/miriad} .} the resulting resolution
95: at each frequency is listed in Table~\ref{tab_src}.\footnote{The 1.4-GHz
96: image was formed using all antennas, while the 2.4-GHz image excluded
97: the 6th antenna so as to not overresolve the source.}
98: Analysis of the \cxo\ data will be reported elsewhere
99: (\cite{hen03}).
100:
101: \subsection{Imaging and Polarimetry}
102:
103: Radio and X-ray images of SNR~\snr\ are shown in
104: Figure~\ref{fig_all_bands}. At radio frequencies, the source is clearly
105: resolved into two components: a bright central core, embedded in
106: an approximately circular limb-brightened shell. Table~\ref{tab_src}
107: lists the flux densities of these two components at 1.4 and 2.4~GHz after
108: applying a correction for the local background.
109: Fitting an ellipse to the perimeter of the
110: shell component, we find that if one excludes the bright protrusion to
111: the southwest, the shell can be fitted by a circle of diameter $120''\pm4''$,
112: centered at RA (J2000) $04^{\rm h}53^{\rm m}37\fs2$, Decl.\ (J2000)
113: $-68^\circ 29'30''$ (with an uncertainty $\pm2''$).
114: For a distance $50d_0$~kpc,
115: the diameter of the shell is $(29\pm1)d_0$~pc.
116:
117: Figure~\ref{fig_core} shows that the central radio core is
118: elongated along a position angle $\sim45^\circ$, with
119: dimensions $30''\times20''$ (i.e.\ a spatial size
120: $7.3d_0$~pc $\times$ $4.8 d_0$~pc). The core is brightest in the
121: NE, where it is dominated by a
122: slightly extended region, with peak position (J2000) RA
123: $04^{\rm h}53^{\rm m}38\fs6$, Dec.\ $-68^\circ29'21\farcs7$
124: ($\pm0\farcs5$ in each coordinate). The core
125: shows significant linear polarization, of mean fractional intensity 6\%
126: at 1.4~GHz and 8\% at 2.4~GHz, as shown in
127: Figure~\ref{fig_core}. The brightest region of the core
128: is offset from the center of the shell by $11''\pm2''$. To the SW,
129: the surface brightness of the core fades with increasing
130: distance from the peak.
131:
132: The third panel of Figure~\ref{fig_all_bands} demonstrates that
133: the morphology of \snr\ in the soft X-ray band shows a broadly similar
134: structure to that seen in the radio, again revealing a central core
135: within a limb-brightened shell.
136: In the hard X-ray band (lower
137: panel of Fig~\ref{fig_all_bands}), only the central core is visible.
138: The extent of this region is $14''\times7''$ ($3.4d_0$~pc $\times$
139: $1.7d_0$~pc), less than half that
140: seen in the radio.
141: Figure~\ref{fig_core} demonstrates that the
142: positions of the peak emission in the X-ray and
143: radio cores coincide to within the resolution of the observations.
144:
145:
146: \subsection{Spectral Analysis}
147:
148: We have carried out a spectral index study of the radio data by smoothing
149: the 1.4 and 2.4~GHz images to a common resolution of $15''$ and then
150: applying spectral tomography to these maps (\cite{kr97}). We
151: find that the central core has a flatter radio spectrum than
152: the surrounding shell: tomography implies $\alpha =
153: -0.10\pm0.05$ for the core and $\alpha = -0.5\pm0.1$ for the shell
154: ($S_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha}$). Assuming $\alpha =
155: -0.10$ for the core between $10^7$ and $10^{11}$~Hz, the radio luminosity
156: of this component is $L_R \sim 2d_0^2\times10^{34}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$.
157:
158: At X-ray energies, we have determined the spectral properties of the
159: different components of the SNR by extracting events from
160: appropriate source and background regions and fitting to the
161: resulting spectra, as will be described in detail by
162: Hendrick \etal\ (2003\nocite{hen03}). To briefly summarize their results,
163: the shell component is well-fitted by the absorbed thermal
164: spectrum expected in the Sedov phase of SNR evolution, while the
165: central core is best fit by an absorbed power law.\footnote{
166: Bremsstrahlung ($kT \sim 4$ keV) can also fit the central
167: core, but the absence of lines demands either absurdly low
168: abundances or an extremely underionized plasma (ionization timescale
169: $n_e t < 100$~yr~cm$^{-3}$).} The best-fit
170: parameters for the core are a foreground absorbing column
171: $N_H = (1.3\pm0.2)\times10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$, a spectral index $\alpha =
172: -0.9\pm0.4$ and an unabsorbed flux density at 1~keV $f_X =
173: (6\pm1)\times10^{-14}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$
174: (uncertainties quoted at 90\% confidence).
175: The corresponding X-ray luminosity over the
176: energy range 0.5--10~keV is $L_X \sim 6d_0^2\times10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
177: The spectral fits for the surrounding shell imply an age $\tau \approx 13$~kyr,
178: a swept-up mass $M_{sw}
179: \approx280 M_\odot$, an upstream density $n_0 \approx 0.4$ cm$^{-3}$
180: and an initial explosion energy $E_0 \approx 5\times10^{50}$~ergs
181: (\cite{hen03}).
182:
183: \section{Discussion}
184:
185: The core embedded in \snr\ is centrally located, polarized,
186: has a filled-center morphology and a flat radio spectrum,
187: and is coincident with a smaller non-thermal X-ray nebula.
188: These properties demonstrate that \snr\ is a composite SNR, containing
189: a synchrotron-emitting PWN powered by a neutron star embedded in a
190: shell SNR.
191:
192: \subsection{Properties of the Central Pulsar}
193: \label{sec_psr}
194:
195: Within the core, no radio or X-ray point source corresponding to the
196: central pulsar is apparent. We can calculate upper limits on the flux
197: from such a source as follows. At radio wavelengths, we made images
198: of the field using only the longest ($>3000$~meters) five baselines in
199: each configuration. At both 1.4 and 2.4~GHz, the brightest region of
200: the core was still detected in these images. At the peak of nebular
201: emission, the corresponding upper limit on a point source is 3~mJy and
202: 0.4~mJy at 1.4 and 2.4~GHz, respectively.
203:
204: In the X-ray band, we employed the {\tt SHERPA}\ package
205: to carry out a 2D fit to the nebular morphology. We fit the core with
206: three components: an elliptical gaussian to define the overall shape,
207: an unresolved source to represent an embedded pulsar, and a constant
208: offset to account for background.
209: Using these three components, we find that in the energy range 0.3--10
210: keV, the best-fit model contains 58 counts in an unresolved central
211: source. While the apparent significance of this source seems high,
212: we obtained equally good or better fits by
213: replacing the unresolved component by a resolved Gaussian. This suggests
214: a complex PWN morphology and only marginal evidence for a point source.
215: Therefore, in subsequent discussion we adopt 58 counts as an upper limit,
216: corresponding to a count-rate $<1.5\times10^{-3}$~cts~sec$^{-1}$. Assuming
217: a column density $N_H = 1.3\times10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ and a power law
218: spectrum with a photon index $\Gamma = 1.5$ (typical for a young pulsar),
219: this corresponds to an unabsorbed X-ray luminosity (0.5--10~keV) $L_X <
220: 6d_0^2 \times10^{33}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$.
221:
222: These radio and X-ray upper limits on emission from a central pulsar are
223: not especially constraining. Our radio limit is $\sim40$ times
224: above the upper limit for radio pulsations at this position
225: from the survey of Manchester \etal\ (2003\nocite{mfl+03}). Several
226: young pulsars have been recently identified with a point-source X-ray
227: luminosity $L_X \approx 10^{32}-10^{33}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ (\cite{mss+02};
228: \cite{hsp+03}), well below the limit seen here.
229:
230: In the absence of a direct detection, a first guess
231: as to the properties of the pulsar in \snr\ can come from
232: comparison with other systems. There are $\sim20$ other shell
233: SNRs known to contain a central X-ray/radio PWN; of
234: these other sources, the properties of \snr\ most closely
235: resemble those of the Vela~SNR and of G0.9+0.1, as demonstrated in
236: Table~\ref{tab_compare}. The similarity of these three systems argues
237: that SNR~\snr\ is most likely powered by a ``Vela-like'' pulsar (e.g.\
238: \cite{kbm+03}), with a spin-period $P \sim 100$~ms, a surface magnetic
239: field $B\sim3\times10^{12}$~G and a spin-down luminosity $\dot{E}
240: \approx 10^{37}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$.
241:
242: In cases in which a PWN has no identified pulsar, considerable
243: further effort has been invested to infer the pulsar's properties
244: (i.e.\ current spin period $P$, initial period $P_0$, period
245: derivative $\dot{P}$ and surface magnetic field $B$)
246: from those of its PWN.
247: The age, spin-down luminosity and surface magnetic
248: field of the system are, respectively:
249: \begin{equation}
250: \tau = \frac{P}{(n-1)\dot{P}} \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{P_0}{P}
251: \right)^{n-1}\right],~~
252: \dot{E} = 4\pi^2 I \frac{\dot{P}}{P^3},~~
253: B = 3.2\times10^{19}(P\dot{P})^{1/2}~{\rm Gauss},
254: \label{eqn_1}
255: \end{equation}
256: where $I\equiv10^{45}$~g~cm$^2$ is the star's moment of inertia,
257: $n \equiv 2- P\ddot{P}/\dot{P}^2$ is the ``braking index'',
258: and $P$ is in seconds. Typically one assumes $n=3$, $P_0 = 0$ and $L_X =
259: \eta \dot{E}$ (where $\eta$ is an assumed efficiency factor).
260: $L_X$ and $\tau$ are determined from observations, from which
261: estimates for $P$, $\dot{P}$ and $B$ can then be derived
262: using Equations~(\ref{eqn_1}).
263:
264: Here we propose an alternative approach, where rather than assuming an
265: (unphysical) value of $P_0$, we use the above expressions to eliminate
266: $P$ and $\dot{P}$, and thus obtain a relation between $B$ and $P_0$.
267: Assuming that $B$ is constant with time, the resulting function has
268: absolute maxima in both $B$ and $P_0$. The robust upper limits on the
269: surface magnetic field and the initial spin period of the neutron star
270: which result are:
271: \begin{equation}
272: B < 3.2\times10^{19} \frac{U}{\tau(n-1)}~{\rm Gauss};~~~~~
273: P_0 < U (\tau[n+1])^{-1/2} \left(\frac{2}{n+1}\right)^{\frac{1}{n-1}},
274: \end{equation}
275: where $U^2 = P^3/\dot{P} = 4\pi^2I\eta/L_X$. These limits are reasonably
276: insensitive to the value of $n$ assumed; for $2 < n < 3$
277: (encompassing the range for the four pulsars for which $n$ has
278: been directly measured; e.g.\ \cite{cmm03}), we find $B <
279: (3.1-6.3)\eta^{1/2}\times10^{13}$~G and $P_0 < (448-488)\eta^{1/2}$~ms
280: for this system. For other PWNe, a solid
281: upper limit is
282: $\eta < 0.05$; we have argued above that the pulsar here is
283: ``Vela-like'', for which $\eta \approx 0.01 - 0.001$ is more
284: reasonable (\cite{pccm02}). We thus conclude that this
285: pulsar has a surface magnetic field $B <
286: 6\times10^{12}$~G and an initial spin period $P_0 < 50$~ms. These values
287: are consistent with ``typical'' radio pulsars such as the Crab ($B =
288: 4\times10^{12}$~G, $P_0 = 19$~ms) and Vela ($B = 3\times10^{12}$~G)
289: pulsars, but not with the emerging class of young pulsars which are
290: highly magnetized and/or slow initial rotators, such as PSRs~J1846--0258
291: ($B=5\times10^{13}$~G; \cite{gvbt00}) or J1210--5226 ($P_0 \approx
292: 400$~ms; \cite{pzst02}).
293:
294: \subsection{Evolutionary State of the PWN}
295:
296: Chevalier (1998\nocite{che98}) divides PWN evolution into successive
297: phases. The PWN first expands supersonically in the SNR interior.
298: The PWN then collides with the SNR reverse shock; this compresses the PWN
299: and causes it to expand more slowly. The pulsar's motion can later become
300: supersonic in the shocked SNR interior, and it then drives a bow-shock.
301:
302: If we assume that the pulsar
303: spin-down luminosity is constant in the initial supersonically expanding phase,
304: the radius of the PWN
305: evolves such that
306: $R_{PWN} = 0.839 \times (\dot{E} \tau/E_0)^{1/5} V_0 \tau$,
307: where $V_0$ was the initial expansion velocity of the SNR
308: (\cite{vagt01}).
309: Here we observe $R_{PWN} \approx 3$~pc, $\tau \approx 13$~kyr
310: and $E_0 \approx 5\times10^{50}$~ergs, and we adopt
311: $\dot{E} = E_{37}\times10^{37}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$. Thus if the PWN is
312: still in this phase of evolution,
313: we require $V_0 \approx 700E_{37}^{-1/5}$~\kms,
314: implying an enormous
315: ejected mass $M_{ej} = 2E_0/V_0^2 \approx 100E_{37}^{2/5}~M_\odot$.
316: We thus conclude that the PWN is almost certainly
317: not expanding supersonically, having
318: a radius much smaller than expected in this interpretation.
319:
320: The brightest radio and X-ray emission from the PWN is offset from the
321: SNR's geometric center by $l = (2.7\pm0.5)d_0$~pc. Since this peak
322: most likely marks the current position of the unseen
323: pulsar, a possible interpretation is that the pulsar is moving away
324: from its birth site with a transverse velocity $V_T =
325: l/\tau = 200\pm40$~\kms. The radio PWN is clearly elongated, with a
326: fading tail pointing back along the implied direction of motion. While
327: this is suggestive of a bow shock morphology,
328: this requires that the pulsar be moving supersonically through shocked
329: ejecta. In the Sedov solution, this condition is met only when $l/R_{SNR}
330: \ga 0.7$ (\cite{vag98}). Unless the pulsar's motion is at less than
331: $\sim20^\circ$ to the line-of-sight (implying a true velocity $V >
332: 700$~\kms), the pulsar in this system is still too close to the center
333: of its SNR to meet this requirement.
334:
335: The remaining possibility is that this PWN has undergone a reverse
336: shock interaction with its SNR, and is now expanding
337: subsonically. Such an interaction begins at an age
338: $\sim10$~kyr when $M_{sw} \ga 10~M_{ej}$
339: (\cite{che98}), consistent with the properties of this
340: source. The elongated morphology and comparatively small radius seen for
341: the radio PWN are simply accounted for by reverse-shock compression;
342: the same properties have been similarly interpreted in the other
343: SNRs listed in Table~\ref{tab_compare} (\cite{bcf01}).
344:
345: \section{Conclusions}
346:
347: New radio and X-ray observations of SNR~\snr\ in the LMC
348: demonstrate this source to consist of both
349: an outer shell and a central pulsar-powered nebula. We have used the
350: properties of this SNR to infer that the unseen central engine is
351: a typical young radio pulsar, with an initial period $P_0 < 50$~ms,
352: a current period $P \sim 100$~ms, a surface field $B < 6 \times
353: 10^{12}$~G and a spin-down luminosity $\dot{E} \sim 10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
354: The small and elongated radio nebula results from
355: compression of the PWN by the SNR reverse shock.
356:
357: This study demonstrates that several useful constraints on the properties
358: of an unseen pulsar can be inferred from those of its associated PWN
359: and SNR, provided that good estimates for the system's distance and age
360: are available. With many new studies of PWNe and composite SNRs now
361: emerging, such an approach can be applied to many other sources.
362:
363: \begin{acknowledgements}
364:
365: We thank Bob Sault for allowing us to carry out the ATCA observations
366: remotely from Harvard University, Dick Manchester for information on
367: pulsar surveys of the LMC, and Eric van der Swaluw and Patrick Slane for
368: useful discussions. The Australia Telescope is funded by the Commonwealth
369: of Australia for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO.
370: This work was supported by NASA through grants GO1-2075X and NAG5-13032.
371:
372: \end{acknowledgements}
373:
374: %\bibliographystyle{apj1}
375: %\bibliography{journals,modrefs,psrrefs,crossrefs}
376:
377: \begin{thebibliography}{}
378:
379: \bibitem[Blondin, Chevalier, \& Frierson 2001]{bcf01}
380: Blondin, J.~M., Chevalier, R.~A., \& Frierson, D.~M. 2001, { ApJ}, {\rm 563},
381: 806.
382:
383: \bibitem[Chevalier 1998]{che98}
384: Chevalier, R.~A. 1998, { Mem. della Soc. Ast. It.}, {\rm 69}, 977.
385:
386: \bibitem[Cusumano, Massaro, \& Mineo 2003]{cmm03}
387: Cusumano, G., Massaro, E., \& Mineo, T. 2003, { A\&A}, {\rm 402}, 647.
388:
389: \bibitem[Gotthelf \etal 2000]{gvbt00}
390: Gotthelf, E.~V., Vasisht, G., Boylan-Kolchin, M., \& Torii, K. 2000, { ApJ},
391: {\rm 542}, L37.
392:
393: \bibitem[Helfand \& Becker 1987]{hb87}
394: Helfand, D.~J. \& Becker, R.~H. 1987, { ApJ}, {\rm 314}, 203.
395:
396: \bibitem[{Helfand}, {Gotthelf}, \& {Halpern} 2001]{hgh01}
397: {Helfand}, D.~J., {Gotthelf}, E.~V., \& {Halpern}, J.~P. 2001, { ApJ}, {\rm
398: 556}, 380.
399:
400: \bibitem[Hendrick \etal 2003]{hen03}
401: Hendrick, S.~P. \etal 2003,
402: \newblock in preparation.
403:
404: \bibitem[Hughes \etal 2003]{hsp+03}
405: Hughes, J.~P., Slane, P.~O., Park, S., Roming, P. W.~A., \& Burrows, D.~N.
406: 2003, { ApJ}, {\rm 591}, L139.
407:
408: \bibitem[Katz-Stone \& Rudnick 1997]{kr97}
409: Katz-Stone, D.~M. \& Rudnick, L. 1997, { ApJ}, {\rm 488}, 146.
410:
411: \bibitem[{Kramer} \etal 2003]{kbm+03}
412: {Kramer}, M. \etal 2003, { MNRAS},
413: \newblock in press (astro-ph/0303473).
414:
415: \bibitem[Manchester \etal 2003]{mfl+03}
416: Manchester, R.~N., Fan, G., Lyne, A.~G., Kaspi, V.~M., \& Crawford, F. 2003,
417:
418: \newblock in preparation.
419:
420: \bibitem[Manchester, Staveley-Smith, \& Kesteven 1993]{msk93}
421: Manchester, R.~N., Staveley-Smith, L., \& Kesteven, M.~J. 1993, { ApJ}, {\rm
422: 411}, 756.
423:
424: \bibitem[Murray \etal 2002]{mss+02}
425: Murray, S.~S., Slane, P.~O., Seward, F.~D., Ransom, S.~M., \& Gaensler, B.~M.
426: 2002, { ApJ}, {\rm 568}, 226.
427:
428: \bibitem[{Pavlov} \etal 2002]{pzst02}
429: {Pavlov}, G.~G., {Zavlin}, V.~E., {Sanwal}, D., \& {Tr{\" u}mper}, J. 2002, {
430: ApJ}, {\rm 569}, L95.
431:
432: \bibitem[Porquet, Decourchelle, \& Warwick 2003]{pdw03}
433: Porquet, D., Decourchelle, A., \& Warwick, R.~S. 2003, { A\&A}, {\rm 401}, 197.
434:
435: \bibitem[Possenti \etal 2002]{pccm02}
436: Possenti, A., Cerutti, R., Colpi, M., \& Mereghetti, S. 2002, { A\&A}, {\rm
437: 387}, 993.
438:
439: \bibitem[van~der Swaluw, Achterberg, \& Gallant 1998]{vag98}
440: van~der Swaluw, E., Achterberg, A., \& Gallant, Y.~A. 1998, { Mem. della Soc.
441: Ast. It.}, {\rm 69}, 1017.
442:
443: \bibitem[van~der Swaluw \etal 2001]{vagt01}
444: van~der Swaluw, E., Achterberg, A., Gallant, Y.~A., \& T\'{o}th, G. 2001, {
445: A\&A}, {\rm 380}, 309.
446:
447: \bibitem[Wang \etal 2001]{wgcd01}
448: Wang, Q.~D., Gotthelf, E.~V., Chu, Y.-H., \& Dickel, J.~R. 2001, { ApJ}, {\rm
449: 559}, 275.
450:
451: \bibitem[Weiler \& Panagia 1980]{wp80}
452: Weiler, K.~W. \& Panagia, N. 1980, { A\&A}, {\rm 90}, 269.
453:
454: \end{thebibliography}
455:
456: \clearpage
457: %\small
458:
459: \begin{table}[hbt]
460: \begin{center}
461: \caption{Radio properties of SNR~\snr.}
462: \label{tab_src}
463: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc} \hline
464: Waveband & Resolution & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Flux Density (mJy)} \\
465: (cm) & (arcsec) & Core & Shell & Total \\ \hline
466: 1.4~GHz &$7.3\times6.7$ & $46\pm2$ & $140\pm2$ & $186\pm3$ \\
467: 2.4~GHz & $9.2\times8.4$ & $46\pm2$ & $105\pm2$ & $151\pm3$ \\ \hline
468: \end{tabular}
469: \end{center}
470: \end{table}
471:
472: \begin{table}
473: \begin{center}
474: \caption{Comparison of SNR~\snr\ to other similar systems.}
475: \label{tab_compare}
476: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc} \hline
477: SNR & Age & $R_{SNR}$ & $R_{PWN}$ &
478: $L_{R,PWN}$
479: & $L_{X,PWN}$ &
480: Ref\tablenotemark{b} \\
481: & ($10^3$~yr) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} &
482: \multicolumn{2}{c}{($10^{34}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$)} \\ \hline
483: \snr & 13 & $29\pm1$ & $7\times5$ & 2 & 6 & 1 \\
484: Vela~SNR & $\sim11$ & 42 & 10 & 0.8 & 0.8\tablenotemark{a} & 2, 3 \\
485: G0.9+0.1 & $\sim10-20$ & 20 & 6 & 7 & 6 & 4, 5 \\ \hline
486: \end{tabular}
487: \tablenotetext{}{$R_{SNR}$ and $R_{PWN}$ are the radii of
488: the SNR and PWN respectively;
489: $L_{R,PWN}$ and $L_{X,PWN}$ are the approximate radio
490: and X-ray luminosities, respectively, of the PWN. }
491: \tablenotetext{a}{The PWN luminosity quoted by Helfand \etal\
492: (2001\nocite{hgh01}) is much lower than this, but
493: corresponds to only the innermost component of the PWN.}
494: \tablenotetext{b}{{\sc References:} (1) This paper;
495: (2) Weiler \& Panagia (1980\nocite{wp80}); (3)
496: Helfand \etal\ (2001\nocite{hgh01}); (4) Helfand \& Becker
497: (1987\nocite{hb87}); (5) Porquet \etal\ (2003\nocite{pdw03}).}
498: \end{center}
499: \end{table}
500:
501: \normalsize
502:
503: \clearpage
504:
505: \begin{figure}[hbt]
506: %\centerline{\psfig{file=fig_all_bands_xfig.eps,height=0.8\textheight}}
507: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.eps,height=0.8\textheight}}
508: \caption{Radio and X-ray images of SNR~\snr. The top two panels show ATCA
509: radio images of the source at 1.4 and 2.4~GHz, while the
510: bottom two panels show \cxo\ X-ray images of \snr\ in the soft and hard
511: bands. The two radio images have both been smoothed to
512: a resolution of $10''\times10''$. The sensitivity of the radio images
513: are 95 and 65~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$ at 1.4 and 2.4~GHz respectively.
514: Both radio images are shown over the same greyscale range, --0.4 to
515: +5.7~mJy~beam$^{-1}$. The X-ray images have both been smoothed with
516: a gaussian of FWHM $5''\times5''$; the greyscale ranges are
517: 0\%--100\% and 0\%--56\% of the peak for the soft- and hard-band
518: images respectively.
519: In all four panels, the
520: point-spread function is shown by the ellipse in the
521: lower-right corner, and the greyscale is shown using a
522: linear transfer function.}
523: \label{fig_all_bands}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: \clearpage
527:
528: \begin{figure}[hbt]
529: %\centerline{\psfig{file=fig_core.eps,width=0.8\textwidth,angle=270}}
530: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.eps,width=0.8\textwidth,angle=270}}
531: \caption{Radio and X-ray images of the core of SNR~\snr. The greyscale
532: shows X-ray emission from the central region of \snr\ as seen by \cxo\
533: in the energy range 0.3--8.0~keV, smoothed to a resolution of $2''$. The
534: contours represent the 2.4-GHz image at full resolution ($9\farcs2 \times
535: 8\farcs4$),
536: drawn at the levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10~mJy~beam$^{-1}$; the rms
537: sensitivity of these data are 70~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$.
538: Overlaid as vectors are the 2.4-GHz linearly polarized intensity at each
539: position; the length of each vector is proportional to the polarized
540: intensity (up to a maximum of 0.7~mJy~beam$^{-1}$) and the orientation
541: of the vector indicates the mean position angle of the electric
542: field (averaged across the observing bandwidth, and not corrected for
543: Faraday rotation). The ``+'' symbol indicates the center fitted for the
544: surrounding SNR shell.}
545: \label{fig_core}
546: \end{figure}
547:
548: \end{document}
549: