astro-ph0305594/ms.tex
1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex} 
2: 
3: \shorttitle{Rapid Migration in a Non-Uniform Nebula}
4: \shortauthors{Haghighipour $\&$ Boss}
5: 
6: 
7: \begin{document}
8: 
9: 
10: 
11: \title{On Gas-Drag Induced Rapid Migration of Solids 
12: in a Non-Uniform Solar Nebula}
13: 
14: 
15: 
16: 
17: 
18: 
19: \author{ Nader Haghighipour and Alan P. Boss}
20: \affil{Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie 
21:        Institution of Washington, \\ 
22:        5241 Broad Branch Road, Washington, DC 20015}
23: 
24: \email{nader@dtm.ciw.edu, boss@dtm.ciw.edu}
25: 
26: 
27: 
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We study the motions of small solids, ranging from micron-sized
30: dust grains to meter-sized objects, in the vicinity of local
31: pressure enhancements of a gaseous nebula. 
32: Integrating numerically, we show that as a result of 
33: the combined effect of gas drag and pressure gradients,
34: solids tend to accumulate at the locations where the
35: pressure of the gas maximizes. The rate of migration of solids
36: varies with their sizes and densities and also
37: with the physical properties of the gas. The results of our
38: numerical simulations indicate that such migrations are most
39: rapid for meter-sized objects.
40: The applicability of the results to the enhancement of the
41: collision and coagulation of solids and also to the
42: growth-rate of planetesimals is discussed.
43: \end{abstract}
44: 
45: 
46: \keywords{solar system: formation,  planetary systems: formation,
47:           planetary systems: protoplanetary disks} 
48:           
49: 
50: 
51: 
52: \section{Introduction}
53: 
54: We have recently shown that in a rotating, turbulence-free and
55: isothermal gaseous nebula with a density function that maximizes
56: locally, the combined effect of gas drag 
57: and pressure gradients at hydrostatic equilibrium,
58: causes solids to migrate toward
59: the locations of local density enhancements
60: \citep[][hereafter HB03]{Hag03}.
61: The motions of solids in HB03
62: were restricted to the midplane of the nebula and
63: the variation of the gas density along the direction perpendicular 
64: to the midplane was neglected. The results of
65: our numerical simulations of the dynamics of micron-sized
66: dust grains to 100 meter-sized objects indicated that 
67: the radial motions of such solids could be quite rapid 
68: when their sizes range from 1 cm to 1 m. 
69: 
70: In this paper, we extend our previous analysis to three-dimensional 
71: motions and study the radial and vertical migrations of solids 
72: subject to gas drag and the gravitational
73: attraction of a solar type star in a 
74: non-uniform gaseous nebula.
75: 
76: Study of the motions of solids in gaseous mediums has long
77: been of particular interest to astronomers. 
78: Because of the great diversity in the applicability
79: of the results of such studies, in particular, to the
80: process of formation of planetesimals, 
81: the literature in this area has become  
82: so rich that it makes it virtually impossible to cite all the related
83: articles here. For a short review of the history of such
84: studies we refer the reader to HB03 and the references
85: therein. Of direct relevance to this study, however, 
86: are two classic papers by 
87: \citet{Ada76} and \citet{Weid77}, an article by 
88: \citet{Sup00} on the study of the orbital evolution of 
89: solids in a turbulent protostellar disk with application 
90: to the formation of icy planetesimals in the outer region 
91: of the nebula and a recent paper by \citet{Lin02} on the 
92: radial migration of dust grains in an accreting solar nebula.
93: 
94: Our model nebula is turbulence-free and isothermal. 
95: We assume that it consists of pure molecular hydrogen
96: and follows the equation of state of an ideal gas.
97: An enhancement in the pressure of the gas in such a
98: nebula appears where the density of the
99: gas is locally enhanced. To focus attention
100: on the rate of migration of solids and its dependence
101: on their sizes and physical properties, 
102: the density of the nebula is assumed to have an
103: azimuthally symmetric maximum on the midplane. Along
104: the vertical axis, the gas density changes in a way that
105: the vertical component of the pressure gradients balances
106: the vertical component of the gravitational force of 
107: the central star. The direction of radial motions of solids
108: in our model nebula depends on their initial positions 
109: relative to the location of the maximum gas density and
110: their vertical migration is always toward the midplane.
111: \citep{Whip64, Hag03}.
112: 
113: We start by explaining our physical model in $\S$ 2 and
114: present the equations of motions of solids in $\S$ 3.
115: In $\S$ 4, we present the results of our numerical 
116: simulations and in $\S$ 5, we conclude our study by 
117: reviewing the results and discussing their applications.
118: 
119: 
120: 
121: \section{The Physical Model}
122: 
123: We consider a rotating, turbulence-free, and isothermal gaseous
124: nebula of pure molecular hydrogen with a Sun-like star at
125: its center. At hydrostatic equilibrium and in a cylindrical
126: coordinate system with the star at its origin and 
127: the midplane of the nebula as its polar plane, the gravitational
128: attraction of the star at a point with a position vector
129: ${\bf R}(r,z)$ is related to the pressure gradients
130: of the gas as
131: \begin{equation}
132: r {\omega_g^2} = r {\omega_K^2}\,+\,
133: {1\over {{\rho_g}({\bf R})}}\,
134: {{\partial{{\cal P}_g}({\bf R})}\over {\partial r}}
135: \end{equation}
136: in $r$-direction and
137: \begin{equation}
138: z {\omega_K^2}\,+\,
139: {1\over {{\rho_g}({\bf R})}}\,
140: {{\partial{{\cal P}_g}({\bf R})}\over {\partial z}}=0
141: \end{equation}
142: along the $z$-axis.
143: In equations (1) and (2), ${\rho_g}({\bf R})$ and
144: ${{\cal P}_g}({\bf R})$ are the density and pressure of
145: the gas, respectively, $\omega_g$
146: is the angular velocity of the gas on a plane parallel to the
147: midplane at a height $z$, and $\omega_K$ is its corresponding
148: Keplerian angular velocity given by
149: \begin{equation}
150: {\omega_K^2}={{GM}\over {({r^2}+{z^2})^{3/2}}},
151: \end{equation}
152: where $G$ is the gravitational
153: constant and $M$ is the mass of the central star.
154: 
155: The balance of the gravitational attraction of the central
156: star by the pressure gradients in the vertical direction,
157: as given by equation (2), determines the distribution
158: of the gas along the $z$-axis. In the model nebula
159: considered here, the gas is pure molecular hydrogen
160: and it, therefore, obeys the equation state of an ideal gas. 
161: As a result, the pressure and density of the gas are related as
162: \begin{equation}
163: {{\cal P}_g}={{{K_{\rm B}}T}\over {m_0}}{\rho_g}({\bf R})\,,
164: \end{equation}
165: where $K_{\rm B}$ is the Boltzmann constant, $T$ is the temperature
166: of the gas and $m_0$ is the molecular mass of hydrogen.
167: Substituting for ${{\cal P}_g}({\bf R})$ from equation (4)
168: in equation (2), the density of our model nebula will be given by 
169: \begin{equation}
170: {\rho_g}(r,z)\,= \,{\rho_g}(r,0) \>{\rm {Exp}}
171: \Biggl\{{{GM{m_0}}\over {{K_{\rm B}}T}}\,
172: \biggl[{1\over {{({r^2}+{z^2})^{1/2}}}}-{1\over r}\biggr]\Biggr\}.
173: \end{equation}
174: In equation (5), ${\rho_g}(r,0)$ is the density of the gas 
175: on the midplane.
176: 
177: As mentioned in $\S$ 1, in order to focus attention
178: on the dynamics of solids, we consider a nebula with an
179: azimuthally symmetric density enhancement on its midplane.
180: Following HB03, we assume
181: \begin{equation}
182: {\rho_g}(r,0)\,=\,{\rho_0}\,
183: {\rm {Exp}}\Biggl[-\beta\Bigl(
184: {r \over{r_m}}-1 {\Bigr)^2}\Biggr]\,,
185: \end{equation}
186: where ${\rho_0}\,,{r_m}$ and $\beta$ are constant quantities.
187: Figure 1 shows an edge-on view of our model nebula with the line of 
188: sight perpendicular to 
189: one of the midplane diameters. The central star in this figure
190: is solar-type and the gas temperature is 300 K. The values of
191: ${\rho_0}\,,\beta$ and ${r_m}$ are equal to
192: ${10^{-9}}\,{\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}}\,,1$ and 1 AU, respectively.
193: 
194: 
195: 
196: \section{Equation of Motion}
197: 
198: The equation of motion of an object with mass of unity
199: in our model nebula is given by
200: \begin{equation}
201: {{{d^2}{\bf R}}\over {d{t^2}}}\,=\,
202: -\,{{GM}\over {({r^2}+{z^2})^{3/2}}}\,{\bf R}\,-\,{{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}
203: \end{equation}
204: \noindent
205: where ${\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}$ represents the
206: drag force of the gas for the unit mass of a solid. 
207: Following \citet{Sup00} and as presented in HB03,
208: we write ${\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}$ as
209: \begin{equation}
210: {{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}\,=\,
211: {{{\rho_g}({\bf R})}\over {{\rho_p}({a_p}+\lambda)}}\,
212: \Biggl[\Bigl({\lambda\over {a_p}}\Bigr)\,
213: {{\bar v}_{\rm {th}}}\,+\,
214: {3\over 8}\,{C_D}\,{v_{\rm {rel}}}\Biggr]\,
215: {{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}\,.
216: \end{equation}
217: \noindent
218: In equation (8), $a_p$ is the radius of the object, $\rho_p$
219: denotes its density, ${v_{\rm {rel}}}=|{{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}|$
220: is the magnitude of its velocity relative to the
221: gas and $\lambda$ is the mean free path of the gas molecules.
222: For a nebula of pure molecular hydrogen, 
223: $\lambda\,{\rm {(cm)}}=4.79 \times {10^{-9}}/
224: {{\rho_g}({\bf R})}$ g cm$^{-3}$ (HB03). The quantity
225: ${{\bar v}_{\rm {th}}}=(8{K_{\rm B}}T/\pi {m_0})^{1/2}$ in equation (8)
226: is the mean thermal velocity of the gas molecules and
227: $C_D$ is the drag coefficient whose numerical value is given by
228: \citep{Whip64, Weid77}
229: \vskip 3pt
230: \begin{equation}
231: {C_D}\,\simeq\,\cases{
232: 24\,{{\rm Re}^{-1}} & if$\quad {\rm Re}<1$ (Stokes' drag) \cr
233: 24\,{{\rm Re}^{-0.6}} & if$\quad1<{\rm Re}<800$\cr
234: 0.44&if$\quad {\rm Re}>800$.\cr}
235: \end{equation}
236: \vskip 3pt
237: \noindent
238: In equation (9), ${\rm Re}$ is the gas Reynolds number and is equal to 
239: \begin{equation}
240: {\rm Re}\,=\,\Bigr({{6\sigma {a_p}} \over 
241: {{m_0}{{\bar v}_{\rm {th}}}}}\Bigl) 
242: {\rho_g}({\bf R}) \,{v_{\rm rel}}\,,
243: \end{equation}
244: \vskip 2pt
245: \noindent
246: where $\sigma=2\times {10^{-15}}\,{\rm {cm}}^2$ 
247: is the collisional cross section of hydrogen molecules.
248: 
249: The velocity of a solid relative to the gas is equal to
250: ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}={{\bf V}_p}-{{\bf V}_g}$ where
251: ${\bf V}_p$ and ${\bf V}_g$ represent the velocities of the
252: solid and gas molecules, respectively.
253: In the cylindrical coordinate system considered here,
254: ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$ has the following components.
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
257: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
258: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
259: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
260: {({{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}})_r}\,=\,{\dot r}\,,\\
261: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
262: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
263: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
264: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
265: {({{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}})_z}\,=\,{\dot z}\,,\\
266: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
267: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
268: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
269: \!\!\!\!\!
270: {({{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}})_\varphi}\,=\,
271: r({\dot \varphi}\,-\,{\omega_g})\,.
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: \noindent
274: where we have assumed that the gas molecules do not move along the
275: $z$-axis. It is important to mention that it is the $r$ and $z$ components
276: of ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$ that play important roles in the
277: radial and vertical migrations
278: of solids. They also dominate the magnitude of  ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$
279: when the object is small.
280: The transverse component of the relative
281: velocity, ${({{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}})_\varphi}$,
282: will have a dominating effect in the magnitude of  ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$
283: for larger objects and it plays an important role 
284: in changing the angular momenta of such solids which can
285: have significant contributions when accretion is considered.
286: 
287: 
288: From equations (11) to (13), the equation of motion of a 
289: solid with a unit mass can be written as
290: \begin{eqnarray}
291: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
292: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
293: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
294: {{\hat P}_r}={\dot {\hat r}},\\
295: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
296: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
297: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
298: {{\hat P}_z}={\dot {\hat z}},\\
299: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
300: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
301: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
302: {{\hat P}_\varphi}={{\hat r}^2}\,{\dot {\hat \varphi}},\\
303: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
304: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
305: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
306: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
307: {{\dot {\hat P}}_r}=& 
308: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
309: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
310: {1\over {{\hat r}^3}}{{\hat P}_\varphi^2}-
311: {{\hat r}\over {({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{3/2}}}-
312: {({{\hat F}_{\rm {drag}}})_r},\\
313: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
314: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
315: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
316: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
317: {{\dot {\hat P}}_z}=&
318: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
319: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
320: -{{\hat z}\over {({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{3/2}}}
321: -{({{\hat F}_{\rm {drag}}})_z},\\
322: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
323: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
324: \!\!\!\!\!
325: {{\dot {\hat P}}_\varphi}=
326: -\,{\hat r}{({{\hat F}_{\rm {drag}}})_\varphi}\,.
327: \end{eqnarray}
328: \noindent
329: In equations (14) to (19), the hat sign indicates a dimensionless
330: quantity. We have followed our convention presented in HB03
331: and have chosen two quantities
332: $r_0$ and $t_0$ to represent the units of length and time,
333: respectively, in such a way that $GM{t_0^2}{r_0^{-3}}=1$. The
334: quantities ${{\hat P}_r}\,,{{\hat P}_z},$ and ${{\hat P}_\varphi}$
335: are the dimensionless radial, vertical and angular momenta of
336: the object, 
337: $(r,z)\,=\,{r_0}({\hat r},{\hat z})\,,
338: {{\hat {\bf F}}_{\rm {drag}}}= {{t_0^2}{{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}/{r_0}}$
339: and $\varphi={\hat \varphi}$.
340: 
341: \section{Numerical Results}
342: 
343: To start integrating equations (14) to (19), numerically, 
344: we take the mass of the central star to be equal to one solar
345: mass and we choose, $\beta =1$ and ${\rho_0}={10^{-9}}$g cm$^{-3}$. 
346: As in HB03, the azimuthal symmetry of the gas density
347: on the midplane of our model nebula allows us to set 
348: ${r_0}={r_m}=1$ AU which implies
349: $t_0$=0.16 years.
350: 
351: An important quantity that has to be determined at the
352: beginning of our integrations is the drag
353: coefficient, $C_D$. As mentioned in the last section, this
354: quantity is a function of the Reynolds number of the
355: gas as given by equation (9).
356: At the beginning of the integration,
357: the initial functional form of $C_D$ is 
358: determined by calculating the initial value of
359: ${\rm Re}$. During the course of integration,
360: the value of ${\rm Re}$
361: is constantly monitored. Once the range of this quantity
362: changes, the integration is continued by adjusting the
363: drag coefficient to its new functional form.
364: 
365: We integrated equations (14) to (19)
366: for different values of solids' radii and densities and also
367: for different values of the gas temperature. The objects
368: were initially placed on circular orbits at different radial
369: positions. The initial height $z$ of an object
370: was taken to be one-tenth of its initial radial distance
371: and ${\hat \varphi}(t=0)=0$.
372: The initial velocity along the $z$-axis was set equal to zero. 
373: 
374: \subsection{Radial Migration}
375: 
376: Figures 2 and 3 show the radial migration of objects with radii
377: ranging from 1 micron to 1 meter. The densities of the objects
378: are equal to 2 g cm$^{-3}$ and the temperature of the
379: gas is 300 K. Each object is
380: once placed at (2,0.2) AU with a radial
381: distance larger than the radial location of the density enhancement
382: on the midplane (i.e., $r=1$ AU), and is once
383: placed at a closer radial distance at (0.25,0.025) AU.
384: As expected, all objects migrate radially in/out toward $r=1$ AU
385: (HB03). Smaller objects show the tendency of staying with
386: the gas and undergo very slow radial migrations.
387: Larger objects, on the other hand, show more rapid motions.
388: As in the case of the two-dimensional model (HB03), a 
389: meter-sized object undergoes the most rapid radial migration. 
390: 
391: Figures 2 and 3 also show that the rate of radial migration
392: is greater for inward motions. A result that was 
393: also observed in two-dimensional simulations of HB03. This
394: can be attributed to the fact that the rate of change
395: of angular momentum for an object beyond the radial location
396: of the density enhancement is larger than that of 
397: an object in a closer distance to the central star.
398: As a result, farther objects lose angular momentum
399: faster, hence, their more rapid radial migration 
400: (see HB03 for more detailed analysis).
401: 
402: As mentioned before, as a result of the combined effect
403: of gas drag and pressure gradients, it is
404: expected that objects at radial distances larger than $r_m$
405: to undergo inward radial migrations.
406: A closer investigation of the results shown in Figures 2 and 3, however,  
407: indicates that at the beginning of their radial motions,
408: objects at $r=2$ AU have, briefly, undergone outward migrations.
409: Figure 4 shows this for a millimeter- and a centimeter-sized particle.
410: Such a behavior can be understood by studying the
411: structure of our model nebula. As given by equation (5), 
412: the maxima of the gas density on planes parallel to the midplane 
413: at different heights $z$ will appear at different
414: radial distances. Figure 5 shows this for
415: $z$ ranging from zero to 0.2 AU. In the top graph of this figure
416: we have plotted the density of the gas as a function of $r$ 
417: for constant values of $z$. As shown here, the radius of the
418: circular enhancement of the nebula increases from $r=1$ AU
419: on the midplane to larger values at higher vertical distances. 
420: The middle and the bottom graphs of Figure 5 show the
421: gas density enhancement at $z=$ 0.15 and 0.2 AU, respectively. 
422: When an object is initially at a radial
423: distance beyond 1 AU, depending on its height from the midplane,
424: it may be inside the circle of the local density enhancement
425: at that height. In such cases, the object starts its radial
426: motion by an outward migration while descending toward the
427: midplane. Once it passes the height where the radial distance
428: of the local maximum density is smaller than its instantaneous
429: radial position, the radial motion of the object 
430: reverses and it starts its inward migration. 
431: 
432: We also numerically integrated equations (14) to (19) for
433: different values of a solid's density.
434: Figure 6 shows the radial migrations of 
435: 1 cm and 1 m solids for different values of their densities. 
436: The temperature of the gas is 300 K.
437: Similar to the results of two-dimensional simulations
438: (HB03), increasing the solid's density results in a more 
439: rapid radial migration for a centimeter-sized or smaller particle.
440: However, it has a reverse effect on the motions of
441: meter-sized and larger objects.
442: Such different responses to the change of the density of a solid
443: are the consequences of the contribution of gas drag in 
444: changing the rates of its radial migration.  
445: Recall that, as mentioned in $\S$ 3, the radial component
446: of the velocity of an object relative to the gas is the dominant
447: factor in its radial motion. For a centimeter-sized or smaller object, 
448: the magnitude of this component, given by equations (11) and (14), 
449: also dominates the magnitude
450: of the relative velocity of the object. Increasing
451: the density of an object while keeping its radius constant
452: results in decreasing the magnitude of the drag force
453: ${{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}$ given by equation (8). 
454: Such a decrease in the magnitude of ${{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}$, in turn,
455: causes the rate of change of the radial component
456: of the relative velocity of the object (equation [17]) to increase,
457: and as a result the object migrates more rapidly.
458: 
459: The situation is not the same for meter-sized and larger objects.
460: In such cases, it is the transverse component of 
461: ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$ (equation [13])
462: that dominates its magnitude.
463: That is, as opposed to small particles,
464: the motion of a meter-sized or larger object is
465: dominated by the rate of the change of its angular momentum. 
466: Because the magnitude of ${{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}$ decreases by
467: increasing the solid's density, from equation (19), 
468: a larger value for $\rho_p$
469: results in a smaller rate for the decrease/increase of the 
470: angular momentum of the object. In other words, an increase of 
471: the solid's density will increase its reluctance in loosing/gaining
472: angular momentum and hence a decrease in its rate of 
473: inward/outward radial migrations.
474: 
475: Numerical integrations were also carried out for different values
476: of the gas temperature. Figure 7 shows radial migrations of
477: a centimeter- and a meter-sized object with a density of 2 g cm$^{-3}$
478: for four values of the gas temperature. As shown here, increasing the
479: temperature of the gas results in increasing the rate of 
480: radial migration. This is an expected result which is
481: the consequence of an increase in the radial component of the
482: pressure gradients of the
483: gas. Figure 8 shows this concept in more detail. In this figure,
484: we have plotted the density of the gas as a function of $r$ on
485: a plane parallel to the midplane at $z=0.2$ AU. As a result of 
486: increasing the temperature of the gas from 50 K to 1000 K, the
487: maximum value of the gas density on this plane 
488: is increased by three orders of
489: magnitude. Such an increase implies an increase in the 
490: radial component of the pressure
491: gradients of the gas which in turn results in more rapid radial
492: migration. 
493: 
494: From equation (5), the radial position of
495: the maximum of the gas density at a certain height $z$
496: approaches smaller values by increasing the gas temperature.
497: Figure 8 shows this for $z=$0.2 AU. For an object at this height
498: and at an initial radial position of $r=2$ AU,
499: such a decrease in 
500: the radius of the local density enhancement
501: causes the distance of the initial outward migration 
502: of the object to become smaller (Figure 7). 
503: For the temperature of 1000 K,  
504: the radial location of the maximum gas density at $z=0.2$ AU 
505: becomes smaller than 2 AU and as a result, 
506: an object at (2,0.2) AU does not
507: undergo an initial outward migration. 
508: 
509: 
510: 
511: \subsection{Vertical Migration}
512: 
513: While the combined effect of pressure gradients
514: and the drag force of the gas causes solids to
515: radially migrate toward the location of local
516: density enhancement, 
517: the vertical component of the gravitational force of the
518: central star attracts solids
519: toward the midplane of the nebula.
520: Figure 9 shows the vertical motion of solids with different sizes.
521: The dependence of the rate of vertical migration on the size
522: of an object can clearly be seen from this figure. 
523: As shown here, except for
524: when the objects are in the vicinity of the midplane, the rates of their
525: vertical migrations increase by increasing their radii.
526: In the vicinity of the midplane, however, while 10 centimeter-sized
527: and smaller objects continue their smooth descent, the 1 meter-sized
528: object undergoes an overshoot. Such an overshoot and its 
529: corresponding damped oscillatory motion are more pronounced
530: when the density of the object is increased. Figure 10 shows
531: the vertical migrations of a 1 centimeter-sized and a 1 meter-sized
532: object for different values of their densities. As shown here,
533: the rates of vertical descent of both objects increase by increasing
534: their densities. Once in the vicinity of the midplane,  
535: the meter-sized object undergoes a damped oscillatory motion
536: whose amplitude increases by increasing the solid's density.
537: Figure 11 shows the three-dimensional paths of these two objects.
538: 
539: The dynamical behavior of an object along the $z$-axis and
540: in the vicinity of the midplane
541: can be explained by studying equation (18) in more detail.
542: In this equation, the drag coefficient $C_{\rm D}$ is the 
543: factor that determines the functional form of 
544: ${{\dot {\hat P}}_z}$. Substituting for the drag force of 
545: the gas from equation (8) and for the $z$-component of the 
546: relative velocity of an object with respect
547: to the gas from equation (12), equation (18) can be written as
548: \vskip 5pt
549: \begin{equation}
550: {{\dot {\hat P}}_z}= -
551: {{\hat z}\over {({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{3/2}}}-
552: {{{{\hat \rho}_g}({\bf R})}\over {{{\hat \rho}_p}
553: ({{\hat a}_p}+{\hat \lambda})}}\,
554: \Biggl[\Bigl({{\hat \lambda}\over {{\hat a}_p}}\Bigr)\,
555: {{\hat {\bar v}}_{\rm {th}}}\,+\,
556: {3\over 8}\,{C_D}\,{{\hat v}_{\rm {rel}}}\Biggr]
557: {{\hat P}_z}\,.
558: \end{equation}
559: \vskip 10pt
560: \noindent
561: In the following we study equation (20) for 
562: ${\rm Re}<1$ and $1<{\rm Re}<800$. The case of
563: ${\rm Re}>800$ is not studied here since it corresponds 
564: to the motions of objects
565: with sizes equal or greater than 100 m. As shown in HB03, 
566: the rates of migrations of such objects due to gas drag
567: and pressure gradient decrease by increasing their
568: sizes. In this paper, we focus our study on rapid migration
569: of small solids.
570: 
571: \subsubsection{${C_D}=24\, {\rm Re}^{-1}$}
572: 
573: Replacing ${t_0}, {K_{\rm B}}, {m_0}$ and $\sigma$ by
574: their numerical values and considering spherical solids with
575: masses of $(4/3)\pi {a_p^3}{\rho_p}$, equation
576: (20) is written as
577: \begin{equation}
578: {{\dot {\hat P}}_z}\simeq -
579: {{\hat z}\over {({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{3/2}}}-
580: {3.73 \over {{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
581: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})}\,
582: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]}\,
583: {T^{1/2}}\,{{\hat P}_z},
584: \end{equation}
585: where $T$ is in Kelvin. In the vicinity of the midplane,
586: ${\hat z}<<{\hat r}$ and equation (21) can be simplified to
587: \begin{equation}
588: {\ddot {\hat z}}+
589: {3.73 \over {{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
590: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})}\,
591: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]}\,
592: {T^{1/2}}\,{\dot{\hat z}}+
593: {{\hat z}\over {{\hat r}^3}} \simeq 0.
594: \end{equation}
595: 
596: Equation (22) resembles the equation of a damped 
597: harmonic motion with a dimensionless frequency of
598: \begin{equation}
599: {{\hat \omega}^2}={{\hat r}^{-3}}\,-\,
600: 3.48\,T\,{\Bigl\{{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
601: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})\,
602: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]\Bigr\}^{-2}}\,.
603: \end{equation}
604: Equation (23) indicates that ${\hat \omega}^2$ is a function
605: of the solid's radius and density, the gas temperature and also
606: the mean free path of the gas molecules, $\lambda$. We recall
607: that $\lambda$ varies with the gas density as 
608: mentioned in $\S$3.
609: 
610: At any location in the vicinity of the midplane,
611: the type of the motion of an object depends on
612: the sign of ${\hat \omega}^2$ at that location.
613: The left column of Figure 12 shows the absolute value of the
614: second term of equation (23) for a centimeter-sized object
615: initially at (1.25,0.125) AU. We chose ${a_p}=1$ cm
616: as a representative of solids with ${\rm Re}<1$
617: since the results of our numerical 
618: integrations indicate that the first sign of
619: a Reynolds number larger than unity appears for an object
620: with a radius of 10 cm. Since for an object at
621: (1.25,0.125) AU, ${\hat r}^{-3}$ varies between 0.512 and 1,
622: the graphs of ${{\hat r}^2}-{{\hat \omega}^2}$,  
623: as shown in Figure 12, indicate that for a centimeter-sized
624: object, ${\hat \omega}^2$ is negative. A negative value for  
625: ${\hat \omega}^2$ is an indication of an overdamped motion.
626: Increasing the density of the solid
627: while keeping the gas temperature constant, ${\hat \omega}^2$
628: becomes larger and approaches zero (critically damped) 
629: indicating that the overdamped
630: nature of the vertical motion of the particle weakens and it may
631: even change into an underdamped motion where  ${\hat \omega}^2$
632: is positive.
633: 
634: From equation (23),
635: the overdamping nature of the vertical motion 
636: becomes even more pronounced when the radius of the object
637: is smaller than 1 cm. That means, the rate of vertical
638: migration of a solid decreases by decreasing its size
639: (Figure 9).
640: 
641: The left column of 
642: Figure 12 also shows that for a constant value of the
643: solid's density, increasing the gas temperature results in
644: lower values for  ${\hat \omega}^2$. That means, at higher
645: temperatures, the overdamping of the vertical motion of the
646: object becomes more pronounced (top graph of Figure 13). 
647: This can be explained noting that from equation (5)
648: and as shown in Figure 15, at any radial distance $r$,
649: the vertical distribution of the gas maximizes at $z=0$
650: (i.e., on the midplane). As shown in Figure 14,
651: the width of the gas distribution function
652: along the $z$-axis increases by increasing the gas temperature. 
653: As a result of this broadening, the resistive effect of gas drag
654: on the vertical motion of solids appear in a larger range
655: of variable $z$ which results in a longer time for descending toward the
656: midplane. 
657: 
658: 
659: \subsubsection{${C_D}=24\, {\rm Re}^{-0.6}$}
660: 
661: In this case, equation (20) can be written as
662: \vskip 1pt
663: \begin{eqnarray}
664: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
665: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
666: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
667: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
668: {{\dot {\hat P}}_z}\simeq -
669: {{\hat z}\over {({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{3/2}}}-
670: {2.44 \over {{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
671: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})}\,
672: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]}\,
673: {T^{1/2}}\,{{\hat P}_z} \nonumber\\
674: &\Biggl\{1 + 8.56\,{[{a_p}({\rm {cm}})]^{0.4}}\,{T^{-0.2}}
675: {\biggl[{{\hat P}_r^2}+{{\hat P}_z^2}+
676: \biggl({{{\hat P}_\varphi}\over {\hat r}} - 
677: {\sqrt {{1\over {\hat r}} - {9.29 \times 10^{-6}}\,T\, 
678: {\hat r}({\hat r}-1)}\,\biggr)^2}\,\biggr]^{0.2}}\nonumber\\
679: &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad
680: {\rm {Exp}}\Bigl\{86098\>{T^{-1}}
681: \biggl[{1\over {{({{\hat r}^2}+{{\hat z}^2})^{1/2}}}}-
682: {1\over {\hat r}}\biggr]-0.4{({\hat r}-1)^2}\Bigr\}\Biggr\}.
683: \end{eqnarray}
684: \vskip 5pt
685: \noindent
686: Similar to the previous case, in the vicinity
687: of the midplane, equation (24) can be simplified to
688: \begin{eqnarray}
689: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
690: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
691: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
692: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
693: {\ddot {\hat z}}+
694: {2.44 \over {{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
695: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})}\,
696: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]}\,
697: {T^{1/2}}\,{\dot{\hat z}}
698: \Biggl\{1 + 8.56\, {[{a_p}({\rm {cm}})]^{0.4}}\,{T^{-0.2}}\nonumber\\
699: &\qquad
700: {\Biggl[{{\dot{\hat r}}^2}+{{\dot{\hat z}}^2}+
701: \biggl({\hat r}{\dot{\hat \varphi}} - 
702: {\sqrt {{1\over {\hat r}} - {9.29 \times 10^{-6}}\,T\, 
703: {\hat r}({\hat r}-1)}\,\biggr)^2}\,\Biggr]^{0.2}}
704: {e^{-0.4{({\hat r}-1)^2}}}\Biggr\}+
705: {{\hat z}\over {{\hat r}^3}} \simeq 0.
706: \end{eqnarray}
707: \vskip 2pt
708: \noindent
709: For any value of $\hat r$, equation (25) resembles the equation of 
710: motion of a damped oscillator
711: with a dimensionless frequency of
712: \begin{eqnarray}
713: &\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
714: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
715: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
716: {{\hat \omega}^2}={{\hat r}^{-3}}\,-\,
717: 1.49\,T\,{\Bigl\{{a_p}{\rm (cm)}\,
718: {\rho_p}({\rm {g\,cm^{-3}}})\,
719: [{a_p}{\rm (cm)}+{\lambda {\rm (cm)}}]\Bigr\}^{-2}}\nonumber\\
720: &\!\!\!\!\!\!
721: {\Biggl\{1 + 8.56 \,{[{a_p}({\rm {cm}})]^{0.4}}\,{T^{-0.2}}
722: {\Biggl[{{\dot{\hat r}}^2}\!+\!{{\dot{\hat z}}^2}\!+\!
723: \biggl({\hat r}{\dot{\hat \varphi}}\!-\! 
724: {\sqrt {{1\over {\hat r}} - 
725: {9.29 \times 10^{-6}} T 
726: {\hat r}({\hat r}-1)}\,\biggr)^2}\,\Biggr]^{0.2}}\!\!\!\!
727: {e^{-0.4{({\hat r}-1)^2}}}\Biggr\}^2}\!\!\!.
728: \end{eqnarray}
729: \vskip 5pt
730: \noindent
731: The right column of Figure 12 shows the absolute value of the second
732: term of this equation for different values
733: of the density of a meter-sized object initially
734: at (1.25,0.125) AU. The radial migration of 
735: such an object starts at ${\hat r}=1.25$ and terminates at 
736: ${\hat r}=1$, implying that the first term of equation 
737: (26) will vary between 0.512 and 1.
738: As shown in Figure 12, at a constant temperature and for
739: a given value of $\hat r$, the contribution
740: of the second term of equation (26) is quite small.
741: As a result, the instantaneous dimensionless frequency 
742: ${\hat \omega}^2$ stays positive for the entire
743: time of the solid's migration indicating that the motion
744: of such an object, in both sides of the midplane, is
745: an underdamped oscillatory motion. 
746: 
747: Figure 12 also shows that
748: the numerical contribution of the second term of equation (26)
749: decreases by increasing the solid's density at a constant
750: temperature. This results in larger frequencies for denser
751: objects which in turn, results in more
752: oscillations (Figure 10). One can also see from Figure 12 that
753: for a constant value of the solid's density, increasing the
754: gas temperature will increase the numerical value of the
755: second term of equation (26). This results in a smaller
756: frequency and less oscillatory behavior (bottom graph of Figure 13). 
757: It is necessary to mention that the irregular shape of the
758: second term of equation (26) for $r>1.25$,
759: is due to the initial outward migration
760: of the solid. 
761: 
762: 
763: \section {Summary and Discussion}
764: 
765: We have studied the migration of solids
766: induced by gas drag and pressure gradients in a non-uniform
767: nebula. We considered a rotating, isothermal and
768: turbulence-free gaseous disk with an azimuthally symmetric
769: density enhancement on its midplane and a solar type star at its 
770: center. The results of our numerical simulations of the motions
771: of solids ranging from micron-sized particles to meter-sized
772: objects indicated that solids tend to migrate toward the
773: locations of local maximum pressure. In our model
774: nebula, such locations correspond to places where the
775: density of the gas is locally enhanced. Our results
776: indicate that depending on the physical properties
777: of solids, gas drag induced migration can be quite rapid.
778: Such rapid migrations can increase the rates of collision
779: and coalescence of particles and enhance their growth-rates
780: to larger bodies. The results of the extension of this study 
781: to include mass-growth
782: and collisional coagulation are currently under preparation for
783: publication.
784: 
785: It is necessary to emphasize that the assumptions of an isothermal
786: and turbulence-free nebula were made merely to focus attention 
787: on the sole effect of gas drag on the rate of migration of solids.
788: Also, in this study, we focused our attention on the motion of
789: objects without considering their mutual interactions.
790: In a realistic scenario, one has to allow for the changes of the
791: gas temperature on both radial and vertical directions and
792: also take turbulence and collision into consideration. It is expected that
793: by including turbulence, in particular in the vertical direction,
794: the rate of approach of particles to the midplane of the
795: nebula may decrease. It would then be of utmost value to investigate to 
796: what degree the combined effect of turbulence and gas drag induced
797: rapid migration will enhance the rate of the formation of
798: larger bodies. Such studies are currently underway.
799: 
800: 
801: \acknowledgments
802: 
803: This work is partially supported by the NASA Origins of the Solar 
804: System Program under Grant NAG5-10547 and by the NASA Astrobiology
805: Institute under Cooperative Agreement NCC2-1056.
806: 
807: 
808: \begin{thebibliography}{}
809: \bibitem[Adachi et al.(1976)]{Ada76}
810: Adachi, I., Hayashi, C., $\&$ Nakazawa, K. 1976, Prog.Theor.Phys., 56, 1756
811: \bibitem[Haghighipour $\&$ Boss (2003)]{Hag03}
812: Haghighipour, N. $\&$ Boss, A. P. 2003, To appear in \apj
813: \bibitem[Supulver and Lin (2000)]{Sup00}
814: Supulver, K. D., $\&$ Lin, D. N. C. 2000, Icarus, 146, 525
815: \bibitem[Takeuchi and Lin (2002)]{Lin02}
816: Takeuchi, T., $\&$ Lin, D. N. C. 2002, \apj, 581, 1344 
817: \bibitem[Weidenschilling (1977)]{Weid77}
818: Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, \mnras, 180, 57
819: \bibitem[Whipple (1964)]{Whip64}
820: Whipple, F. L. 1964, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 52, 565
821: \end{thebibliography}
822: 
823: 
824: \clearpage
825: 
826: 
827: \begin{figure}
828: \caption{$\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad${\bf See Figure1.gif}
829: \label{fig1}}
830: \end{figure}
831: 
832: 
833: \clearpage
834: 
835: \begin{figure}
836: \plotone{f2.eps}
837: \caption{Inward and outward radial migrations of small solids
838: from (2,0.2) AU and (0.25, 0.025) AU to (1,0) AU, respectively. 
839: The dotted line represents the migration of a micron-sized particle, the
840: dashed line is that of a 10 micron object, the dash-dotted
841: line corresponds to the radial migration of an object with a 
842: radius equal to 100 micron
843: and the solid line represents the migration of a 
844: millimeter-sized particle. The density of all particles is
845: equal to 2 g/cm$^3$. The physical properties
846: of the gas are similar to those of Figure 1.
847: \label{fig2}}
848: \end{figure}
849: 
850: 
851: \clearpage
852: 
853: 
854: \begin{figure}
855: \plotone{f3.eps}
856: \caption{Radial migration of centimeter-sized (dotted line),
857: 10 centimeter-sized (dashed line) and meter-sized (solid line)
858: objects. The physical properties of the gas and the solids,
859: and the initial positions of the objects 
860: are similar to those of Figure 2. As shown here, meter-sized
861: objects show the most rapid radial migration.
862: \label{fig3}}
863: \end{figure}
864: 
865: 
866: 
867: 
868: 
869: 
870: 
871: 
872: \clearpage
873: 
874: \begin{figure}
875: \plotone{f4a.eps}
876: \plotone{f4b.eps}
877: \vskip -2in
878: \caption{Graphs of the initial outward migrations of 
879: a millimeter-size particle (top) and a centimeter-sized object (bottom).
880: Objects were initially placed at (2, 0.2) AU. The physical
881: properties of the gas and the solids are similar to 
882: those of Figure 2. Note different scales on the time axes.
883: \label{fig4}}
884: \end{figure}
885: 
886: 
887: \clearpage
888: 
889: \begin{figure}
890: \caption{$\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad${\bf See Figure5.gif}
891: \label{fig5}}
892: \end{figure}
893: 
894: 
895: 
896: 
897: \clearpage
898: 
899: \begin{figure}
900: \plotone{f6a.eps}
901: \plotone{f6b.eps}
902: \vskip -2in
903: \caption{Radial migrations of a centimeter-sized particle and
904: a meter-sized solid for different values of the solid's density.
905: The physical properties of the gas are similar to those of Figure 1.
906: As mentioned in the text, centimeter-sized and smaller particles
907: undergo more rapid radial migrations by increasing their densities.
908: The rate of radial migration of a meter-sized or larger object,
909: on the other hand, decreases by increasing its density.
910: Note different scales on time axes.
911: \label{fig6}}
912: \end{figure}
913: 
914: 
915: 
916: \clearpage
917: 
918: \begin{figure}
919: \plottwo{f7a.eps}{f7b.eps}
920: \end{figure}
921: \begin{figure}
922: \plottwo{f7c.eps}{f7d.eps}
923: \caption{Graphs of the radial migration of a millimeter-sized solid 
924: (left column) and a meter-sized object (right column) 
925: for different values of the
926: gas temperature. The values of ${\rho_0},\,\beta$ and $r_m$
927: are similar to those of Figure 1 and the density of all objects is
928: equal to 2 g cm$^{-3}$. As seen from this figure, the rate of radial 
929: migration increases by increasing the temperature. 
930: Note different scales on vertical and horizontal axes.
931: \label{fig7}}
932: \end{figure}
933: 
934: 
935: 
936: \clearpage
937: 
938: \begin{figure}
939: \plotone{f8.eps}
940: \vskip -10in
941: \caption{Radial distribution of the gas on a plane parallel
942: to the midplane at $z=0.2$ AU. 
943: The values of ${\rho_0},\,\beta$ and $r_m$
944: are similar to those of Figure 1.
945: As shown here, increasing the gas temperature means that 
946: the value of the local maximum density increases and
947: its radial location approaches smaller distances.
948: Note different scales on vertical axes.
949: \label{fig8}}
950: \end{figure}
951: 
952: 
953: 
954: 
955: 
956: \clearpage
957: 
958: \begin{figure}
959: \plotone{f9a.eps}
960: \plotone{f9b.eps}
961: \vskip -2in
962: \caption{Vertical migration of solids. The physical properties
963: of the nebula are identical to those of Figure 1.
964: Each particle was initially at a height equal to
965: one-tenth of its radial distance.
966: Note the different scales on the time axes.
967: \label{fig9}}
968: \end{figure}
969: 
970: 
971: 
972: \clearpage
973: 
974: \begin{figure}
975: \plotone{f10a.eps}
976: \plotone{f10b.eps}
977: \vskip -2in
978: \caption{Vertical motion of a centimeter-sized particle
979: and a meter-sized object in the vicinity of the midplane,
980: for different values of their densities. 
981: The initial positions of each
982: particle is (1.25, $\pm$0.125) AU.
983: The physical properties of the 
984: nebula are similar to those of Figure 1. 
985: As shown here, the motion of a 1 cm solid in the vicinity
986: of the midplane is overdamped while a 1 m object
987: undergoes an underdamped oscillatory motion. The rates of 
988: the initial descent of both solids increase by increasing their
989: densities. Note different scales on the time axes.
990: \label{fig10}}
991: \end{figure}
992: 
993: 
994: 
995: \clearpage
996: 
997: \begin{figure}
998: \caption{$\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad${\bf See Figure11.gif}
999: \label{fig11}}
1000: \end{figure}
1001: 
1002: 
1003: 
1004: 
1005: \clearpage
1006: 
1007: \begin{figure}
1008: \plottwo{f12a.eps}{f12b.eps}
1009: \end{figure}
1010: \begin{figure}
1011: \plottwo{f12c.eps}{f12d.eps}
1012: \end{figure}
1013: \begin{figure}
1014: \plottwo{f12e.eps}{f12f.eps}
1015: \end{figure}
1016: \begin{figure}
1017: \plottwo{f12g.eps}{f12h.eps}
1018: \vskip -1in
1019: \caption{Graphs of ${{\hat r}^{-3}}-{\hat \omega}^2$ versus $\hat r$
1020: for a 1 cm particle (left column) and a meter-sized object
1021: (right column). The objects were initially at (1.25,0.125) AU. 
1022: The values of ${\rho_0},\, \beta$ and $r_m$
1023: are similar to those of Figure 1.  
1024: \label{fig12}}
1025: \end{figure}
1026: 
1027: 
1028: 
1029: 
1030: 
1031: \clearpage
1032: 
1033: \begin{figure}
1034: \plotone{f13a.eps}
1035: \plotone{f13b.eps}
1036: \vskip -3in
1037: \caption{Vertical migration of a centimeter-sized particle
1038: and a meter-sized object 
1039: with densities equal to 2 g cm$^{-3}$ for different
1040: values of the gas temperature.
1041: The values of ${\rho_0},\, \beta$ and $r_m$
1042: are similar to those of Figure 1.  
1043: Both particles were initially at
1044: (2,$\pm$0.2) AU. Note different scales on time axes.
1045: \label{fig13}}
1046: \end{figure}
1047: 
1048: 
1049: 
1050: 
1051: \clearpage
1052: 
1053: \begin{figure}
1054: \plotone{f14.eps}
1055: \vskip -4in
1056: \caption{Graph of the vertical distribution of gas at $r=2$ AU
1057: for different values of temperature.
1058: \label{fig14}}
1059: \end{figure}
1060: 
1061: 
1062: 
1063: \clearpage
1064: 
1065: 
1066: \begin{figure}
1067: \caption{$\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad${\bf See Figure15.gif}
1068: \label{fig15}}
1069: \end{figure}
1070: 
1071: 
1072: 
1073: \end{document}
1074: 
1075: 
1076: