1: % sample.tex for the Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society: May 25, 1999
2: \documentstyle[jkas35,epsf]{article}
3:
4: \runningauthor{TANIGUCHI et al.}
5: \runningtitle{HIGH-REDSHIFT LYMAN$\alpha$ EMITTERS}
6: \beginpage{1}
7: \endpage{23}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Lyman$\alpha$ Emitters beyond Redshift 5:
12: The Dawn of Galaxy Formation}
13:
14: \author{Yoshiaki Taniguchi, Yasuhiro Shioya, Masaru Ajiki,
15: Shinobu S. Fujita, Tohru Nagao, \& Takashi Murayama}
16:
17: \address{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
18: Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan \\
19: {\it E-mail: tani@terra.astr.tohoku.ac.jp}}
20:
21: \address{\normalsize{\it (Received June 01, 2003; Accepted June 1, 2003)}}
22:
23: \abstract{
24: The 8m class telescopes in the ground-based optical astronomy
25: together with help from the ultra-sharp eye of the Hubble Space Telescope
26: have enabled us to observe forming galaxies beyond redshift $z=5$.
27: In particular, more than twenty Ly$\alpha$-emitting galaxies
28: have already been found at $z > 5$. These findings provide us with useful hints
29: to investigate how galaxies formed and then evolved in
30: the early universe. Further, detailed analysis of Ly$\alpha$
31: emission line profiles are useful in exploring the nature
32: of the intergalactic medium because the trailing edge of
33: cosmic reionization could be close to $z \sim 6$ -- 7, at which
34: forming galaxies have been found recently.
35: We also discuss the importance of superwinds from forming
36: galaxies at high redshift, which has an intimate relationship
37: between galaxies and the intergalactic medium.
38: We then give a review of early cosmic star formation history
39: based on recent progress in searching for Ly$\alpha$-emitting
40: young galaxies beyond redshift 5.
41: }
42:
43: \keywords{galaxies: starburst ---
44: galaxies: formation -- Observational Cosmology}
45: \maketitle
46:
47: \section{INTRODUCTION}
48:
49: Formation and evolution of galaxies have been intensively discussed
50: in this decade. In particular, the great success of the Hubble Deep
51: Field (HDF) project (Williams et al. 1996; 2000) has provided us with
52: very fruitful and firm observational results on faint galaxies
53: at high redshift through systematic analyses of their broad-band optical
54: and near-infrared (NIR) color properties (e.g., Madau et al. 1996; Lanzetta
55: et al. 1996; Yahata et al. 2000). Follow-up optical and NIR spectroscopy
56: of faint galaxies found in the HDFs resulted in the discovery of many galaxies
57: beyond $z=3$; so-called Lyman break galaxies (LBGs)
58: (Steidel et al. 1996b; Lowenthal et al. 1997; Cohen et al. 2000;
59: Dawson et al. 2001).
60: In addition to these HDF observations, several excellent
61: deep surveys in blank fields also contributed to the understanding
62: of early evolution of galaxies (Cowie et al. 1996; Steidel et al. 1996a,
63: 1999, 2000; Pettini et al. 2001; Shapley et al. 2001, 2003).
64: This progress has also been supported by ground-based 8-10m class
65: telescopes such as Keck 10m telescopes, VLT, and Subaru Telescope.
66:
67: The first discovery of a galaxy beyond $z=5$ was reported by Dey et al.
68: (1998); 0140+326 RD1 at $z=5.34$. This identification was made by detecting
69: the redshifted Ly$\alpha$ emission line ($\lambda_{\rm rest} =1216$ \AA).
70: Since the classical paper by Partridge \& Peebles (1967), many challenges have
71: been actually made to search for Ly$\alpha$ emission from very young galaxies
72: at high redshift. Although most of those early attempts ended in negative results
73: before the mid 1990s (e.g., Pritchet 1994; Thompson et al. 1995),
74: recent advance in optical
75: spectroscopic capability with the 8-10m class telescopes
76: has enabled us to identify such very high-$z$ Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs).
77: Following the success of Weymann et al. (1998), more than twenty
78: such very high-$z$ galaxies have been found to date (see section III).
79:
80: These galaxies are considered to be located at the trailing edge of the cosmic
81: reionization era and thus we are just facing close to the door of the dark age
82: of the universe (Becker et al. 2001; Djorgovski et al. 2001;
83: see for a review, Loeb \& Barkana 2001; Barkana \& Loeb 2001).
84: Accordingly, we human beings are now capable of investigating the dawn of
85: galaxy formation which occurred at $z \gtrsim$ 6 -- 7.
86: In this review, we focus our attention to the recent success of deep
87: surveys of Ly$\alpha$-emitting forming galaxies and discuss the
88: cosmic star formation history, and some implications on superwind
89: activities in such forming galaxies.
90: See also the excellent reviews on
91: this research field given by Thommes (1999), Hu, Cowie, \& McMahon (1999),
92: and Stern \& Spinrad (1999).
93:
94: We adopt a flat universe
95: with $\Omega_{\rm matter} = 0.3$,
96: $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, and $h=0.7$ where $h = H_0/($100 km s$^{-1}$
97: Mpc$^{-1}$) throughout this review.
98:
99: \section{LYMAN$\alpha$ EMITTERS AT $2 < z < 5$}
100:
101: \subsection{Introduction}
102:
103: It has long been thought that forming galaxies are
104: strong emission-line objects because massive stars formed
105: in the initial phase could ionize the surrounding gas clouds.
106: Since such forming galaxies are located at high redshift,
107: the brightest emission line in the optical window could be
108: the hydrogen Ly$\alpha$ line (e.g., Partridge \& Peebles 1967;
109: Meier 1976). This prediction led many astronomers to search for
110: high-$z$ LAEs (see for a review Pritchet 1994).
111: Custom narrowband filters (the band pass is $\simeq$ 100 \AA)
112: have often often used to search for the Ly$\alpha$ emission line.
113: The central wavelength is of course tuned to the wavelength
114: of the redshifted Ly$\alpha$.
115:
116: Prior discussing to the discovery of Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) beyond $z=5$,
117: we give a brief review of Ly$\alpha$ emitters between $z=2$ and $z=5$.
118: In this section, we also give a summary of survey methods that have
119: been used to find LAEs (see also Thommes 1999; Stern \& Spinrad 1999).
120:
121: \subsection{Guided Surveys}
122:
123: \subsubsection{Optical Counterparts of Quasar Absorption Line Systems}
124:
125: Since the discovery in 1968 (Burbidge et al. 1968;
126: Bahcall et al. 1968),
127: several populations of absorption systems have been found in quasar spectra.
128: Such quasar absorption systems are classified as follows.
129: 1) Damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption systems (DLAs) with
130: $N$(H {\sc i}) $\gtrsim 2 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$,
131: 2) Lyman limit absorption systems (LLS) with
132: $N$(H {\sc i}) $\gtrsim 1.6 \times 10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$,
133: 3) Sub Lyman limit absorption systems (LLS) with
134: $N$(H {\sc i}) $\sim 10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$,
135: 4) Ly$\alpha$ forests with
136: $N$(H {\sc i}) $\sim 10^{12 - 15}$ cm$^{-2}$, and
137: 5) Metal-line absorption systems probed either by
138: low-ionization absorption lines such as Mg {\sc ii} or by
139: high-ionization absorption lines such as C {\sc iv};
140: Mg {\sc ii} absorbers have $N$(H {\sc i}) $\gtrsim 10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ while
141: C {\sc iv} absorbers have $N$(H {\sc i}) $\gtrsim 10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$.
142: These systems have been utilized to investigate both protogalactic disks/halos
143: and the intergalactic matter at high redshift
144: (e.g., Weymann et al. 1981; Tytler 1982; Wolfe et al. 1995).
145: Among the absorption system population,
146: much attention has been paid to Damped Ly$\alpha$
147: absorption systems (DLAs)
148: because their observed H {\sc i} column densities, $> 2 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$,
149: are comparable to those of galactic disks and thus
150: they are often considered to be progenitors of the present-day
151: disk galaxies.
152: Possible origins of both DLAs and LLSs have been considered as;
153: 1) Protogalactic disks/halos,
154: 2) merging protogalactic gas clumps in CDM cosmologies,
155: 3) gas-rich dwarf galaxies,
156: 4) collapsing halos with merging clouds,
157: and 5) low surface brightness galaxies.
158: Therefore, it is important to
159: identify counterparts of DLAs and LLSs at high redshift.
160:
161: Although early searches mostly failed, the first discovery of
162: a LAE beyond $z=2$ was reported by Hunstead et al. in 1990.
163: They found a Ly$\alpha$ emitting object as an optical counterpart of
164: the Damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption (DLA) system at $z_{\rm abs} =
165: 2.465$ which was detected toward the line of sight to Q0836+113
166: at $z_{\rm em} = 2.67$. This LAE is small ($\lesssim$ 10 kpc)
167: and has a very narrow line width (FWHM $<$ 60 km s$^{-1}$).
168: The inferred star formation rate (SFR\footnote{In this review,
169: we use the relation $SFR = 9.1 \times 10^{-43} L({\rm Ly}\alpha) ~ M_\odot
170: {\rm yr}^{-1}$ (Kennicutt 1998; Brocklehurst 1971).})
171: is also modest, $SFR \sim 1 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
172: Therefore, they suggested that this LAE is a gas-rich H {\sc ii} galaxy.
173:
174: However, this observation was not confirmed by later observations
175: (Wolfe et al. 1992; Lowenthal et al. 1995).
176: Nevertheless, their work encouraged researchers to carry out similar searches
177: for LAE counterparts of DLAs at high redshift because this method provided
178: a new type of guided search for high-$z$ LAEs.
179: As summarized in Table 1, up to now, LAE counterparts
180: of the seven DLA systems have been confirmed (e.g., Djorgovski et al. 1996)
181: in the redshift range between $z=1.9$ and $z=3.4$.
182:
183: The most distant LAE found so far as a counterpart of DLA
184: is DLA0000$-$2619 at $z=3.39$ (Macchetto et al. 1993; Giavalisco et al. 1994).
185: The second most distant known is DLA 2233+131 at $z=3.15$ (Djorgovski et al. 1996).
186: The latter object appears to be a massive disk galaxy with $M \sim 10^{11} M_\odot$.
187: This reinforces the importance of the optical identification of
188: LAE counterparts of DLAs at high redshift even though the success rate
189: is not so high.
190: We hope that such surveys will be applied to higher-$z$ DLAs found in
191: very high-$z$ SDSS quasars (e.g., Fan et al. 2000, 2001, 2003)
192:
193: One interesting problem in the optical counterparts is that
194: some of them have large impact parameters; e.g., a few hundreds
195: kpc from the line of sight toward a quasar. If they are really
196: absorbing agents, their halo size is much larger than for typical galaxies
197: [see also section IV (f)].
198:
199: %-----------------------------------------------------
200: % Table 1
201: %-----------------------------------------------------
202: {
203: \scriptsize
204: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
205: \tablenum{1}
206: \tablewidth{6.5in}
207: \tablecaption{%
208: A summary of the optical counterpart searches for DLAs
209: }
210:
211: \tablehead{
212: \colhead{QSO} & \colhead{$z_{\rm em}$} & \colhead{$z_{\rm abs}$} &
213: \colhead{Ref\tablenotemark{a}} \nl
214: %\cline{5-6}
215: & & & \colhead{(cm$^{-2}$)} \nl
216: }
217: \startdata
218: Q0000-2619 & 4.36 & 3.3902 & 1, 2 \nl
219: Q0100+1300 (PHL 957) & 2.681 & 2.309 & 3 \nl
220: Q0151+048A & 1.922 & 1.9342 & 4 \nl
221: PKS 0528-250 & 2.77 & 2.811 & 5, 6 \nl
222: Q2059-360 & 3.097 & 3.0831 & 7 \nl
223: Q2139-4434 & 3.23 & 2.380 & 8, 9 \nl
224: Q2233+131 & 3.295 & 3.150 & 10 \nl
225: \enddata
226: \tablenotetext{a}{1. Macchetto et al. 1993, 2. Giavalisco et al. 1994,
227: 3. Lowenthal et al. 1991, 4. M\"oller et al. 1998, 5. M\"oller \& Warren 1993,
228: 6. Warren \& M\"oller 1996, 7. Leibundgut \& Robertson 1999, 8. Francis et al.
229: 1996, 9. Francis et al. 1997, and 10. Djorgovski et al. 1996.}
230: \end{deluxetable}
231: }
232:
233: \subsubsection{Objects Associated with High-$z$ Active Galactic Nuclei}
234:
235: Another type of guided search for high-$z$ LAEs are searches for
236: LAEs at a particular redshift where the presence of a certain high-$z$
237: source is already known; e.g., active galactic nuclei (AGNs)
238: such as quasars and radio galaxies.
239: Note that the association does not always mean physical companion
240: galaxies. Rather than this, such searches are intended to find
241: galaxies associated with large-scale structure (e.g., a protocluster
242: region) to which the target AGN also belongs.
243:
244: The first successful result was reported by Djorgovski et al. (1985)
245: who found a Ly$\alpha$-emitting companion galaxy ($z=3.22$) associated
246: with a radio-loud quasar PKS 1614+051 at $z=3.21$ (see also Djorgovski
247: et al. 1987).
248: Steidel et al. (1991) also found a Ly$\alpha$-emitting companion
249: ($z=2.758$) associated with a radio-quiet quasar Q1548+0917
250: at $z=2.749$.
251:
252: Hu et al. (1992) conducted a systematic search
253: for Ly$\alpha$ companion galaxies for a sample of 17 quasars.
254: They found companion candidates for three out of 10 radio-loud
255: quasars while found no candidates were found for seven radio-quiet ones.
256: Later, Hu et al. (1996) found a Ly$\alpha$ companion of BR 1202$-$0725
257: at $z=4.69$. Its Ly$\alpha$ luminosity leads to the star formation
258: rate of several $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ (see also Ohta et al. 2000).
259:
260: One problem in these surveys is that photoionization sources
261: in such close companion galaxies are relatively uncertain
262: because the intense radiation from the quasar itself affects
263: the ionization of gas clouds in companion galaxies.
264: Indeed, the companion galaxy to PKS 1614+051 shows high-ionization
265: emission lines such as C {\sc iv} in its UV spectrum.
266:
267:
268: More recently, Hu \& McMahon (1996)
269: searched for LAEs in the field of quasar BR2237$-$0607 at $z=4.55$
270: using a narrowband filter centered on the quasar's redshifted Ly$\alpha$
271: emission using the UH 2.2 m telescope. They found 10 LAE candidates in the
272: narrowband image and confirmed spectroscopically two LAEs at $z=4.55$.
273: Since these two objects are far from the quasar, it is expected that
274: the ionization is attributed to photoionization by massive stars.
275: Keel et al. (1999) made a similar survey in the field of the radio
276: galaxy 53W 002 at $z=2.4$ and found $\approx$ 20 LAEs at the same redshift.
277: A summary of the above surveys is given in Table 2.
278:
279: %=======================================================
280: % Table 2
281: %=======================================================
282: {
283: \scriptsize
284: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
285: \tablenum{2}
286: \tablewidth{6.5in}
287: \tablecaption{%
288: A summary of the guided surveys for Ly$\alpha$-emitter at $2 < z < 5$
289: }
290:
291: \tablehead{
292: \colhead{Survey\tablenotemark{a}} &
293: \colhead{Field\tablenotemark{b}} &
294: \colhead{$z_{\rm c}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
295: \colhead{$(z_{\rm min}, z_{\rm max})$\tablenotemark{d}} &
296: \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{e}} &
297: \colhead{$EW_{\rm lim}({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{f}} &
298: \colhead{$N({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{g}} &
299: \colhead{$n({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{h}}
300: }
301: \startdata
302: HM96 & BR2237$-$0607 & 4.55 & (4.52, 4.56) & 2304 & \nodata & 2 & $8.7 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
303: K99 & 53W002 & 2.4 & (2.32, 2.45) & 85338 & 92 & 19 & $2.2 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
304: K99 & 53W002E & 2.55 & (2.49, 2.61) & 78588 & 291 & 1 & $1.3 \times 10^{-5}$ \nl
305: K99 & 53W002N & 2.55 & (2.49, 2.61) & 78588 & 155 & 1 & $1.3 \times 10^{-5}$ \nl
306: K99 & 53W002NE & 2.55 & (2.49, 2.61) & 78588 & 184 & 4 & $5.1 \times 10^{-5}$ \nl
307: \enddata
308: \tablenotetext{a}{HM96 = Hu \& McMahon (1996), and K99 = Keel et al. (1999).}
309: \tablenotetext{b}{The name of the targeted field.}
310: \tablenotetext{c}{The central redshift corresponding to the central
311: wavelength of the narrow-band filter ($\lambda_{\rm c}$).}
312: \tablenotetext{d}{The minimum and maximum redshift covered by the
313: narrow-band filter.}
314: \tablenotetext{e}{The co-moving volume covered by the survey in
315: units of $h_{0.7}^{-3}$ Mpc$^3$ with $\Omega_{\rm matter} = 0.3$
316: and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$.}
317: \tablenotetext{f}{The smallest equivalent width of the Ly$\alpha$ emission
318: detected in the survey in units of \AA ~ in the observed frame.}
319: \tablenotetext{g}{The number of Ly$\alpha$ emitters found in the survey.}
320: \tablenotetext{h}{The number density of Ly$\alpha$ emitters found in the survey
321: in units of $h_{0.7}^3$ Mpc$^{-3}$.}
322: \tablenotetext{i}{The LBG (Lyman break galaxies) spike region.}
323: \tablenotetext{j}{La Palma field (Mendez et al. 1997) in the Virgo cluster.}
324: \end{deluxetable}
325: }
326:
327: \subsubsection{Powerful Radio Galaxies}
328:
329: Powerful radio galaxies at high redshift have been providing nice tools
330: that can be used
331: to investigate observational properties of young galaxies hosting
332: radio sources. However, this issue is out of the scope of this review.
333: We recommend readers to visit
334: the following nice reviews (McCarthy 1993; Stern \& Spinrad 1999).
335:
336: \subsubsection{Systematic Serendipitous Searches for LAEs}
337:
338: Serendipitous discoveries of LAEs at high redshift have
339: sometimes been reported in this decade (e.g., Franx et al. 1997;
340: Dey et al. 1998; Dawson et al. 2001; Lehnert \& Bremer 2003).
341: Such objects were really
342: found serendipitously. However, as a survey technique, there is
343: a {\it systematic} serendipitous search for high-$z$ galaxies.
344: In this technique, a certain spectroscopic database is used.
345: Since most spectroscopic observations could be made to investigate
346: some target objects, we introduce this technique in the category of
347: guided surveys.
348:
349: Thompson \& Djorgovski (1995) reported their ^^ ^^ systematic"
350: serendipitous search for LAEs using a database of optical, long-slit
351: spectroscopy obtained with both the Double Spectrograph and
352: 4-shooter instruments on the Hale 5m telescope. The database
353: consists of 421 independent spectra covering 14.97 arcmin$^2$;
354: note that 1$\sigma$ limiting flux is $\sim 1 \times 10^{-17}$
355: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.
356: They found 65 emission-line objects among which
357: are two quasars at $z=1.67$ and $z=1.19$.
358:
359: Using much deeper spectroscopic archival data obtained by Keck
360: telescope, Manning et al. (2002) made a similar search for
361: high-$z$ LAEs. They found two LAE candidates at $z=3.02$ and
362: $z=3.36$. Since these objects are close to the Lyman break galaxy
363: SSA22-C17 at $z=3.30$, they may be objects associated with
364: the overdensity region identified by Steidel et al. (2000).
365:
366: Our group actually has the experience of the serendipitous discovery of
367: a high-$z$ object (a BAL quasar at $z=3.1$) in our long-slit
368: spectrum obtained with ESI on Keck II telescope.
369: Spectroscopic archival data must be checked carefully by
370: anyone who is interested in serendipitous discovery of
371: high-$z$ objects.
372: This may provide an example of the importance of the Virtual
373: Observatory (see for a recent review, Brunner et al. 2002).
374:
375: \subsection{Blank-Field Surveys}
376:
377: One of main purposes of deep surveys is to understand how
378: ordinary galaxies like the Milky Way formed and evolved.
379: For this purpose, it is important to observe typical fields in which
380: there are no known unusual object such as luminous AGNs and massive
381: clusters of galaxies; i.e.,
382: blank fields. Famous blank fields are the Hubble Deep Fields
383: (HDFs: Williams et al. 1996, 2000)
384: and the SSA (small selected area) fields selected by the L. L. Cowie
385: team at IfA, UH (Cowie et al. 1996 and references therein).
386:
387: \subsubsection{Spectroscopic Follow-up of Objects found in
388: Black-Field Surveys}
389:
390: Since the early 1990s, the so-called Lyman break method has often been
391: used to identify high-$z$ galaxies (Steidel \& Hamilton 1992,
392: 1993; Steidel et al. 1995, 1998, 1999; Lanzetta et al. 1996; Madau et al. 1996;
393: Yahata et al. 2000; Iwata et al. 2003; Yan et al. 2002).
394: Since such surveys provided nice samples of
395: LBGs at $z>3$, follow-up spectroscopy has been
396: conducted intensively and a large number of high-$z$ LBGs
397: have already been identified (Steidel et al. 1996a, 1996b; Lowenthal et al. 1997;
398: Shapley et al. 2003 and references therein).
399:
400: Another important discovery came from a spectroscopic survey for
401: galaxies toward a foreground cluster of galaxies at $z=0.37$;
402: MS 1512-cB58 at $z=2.73$ (Yee et al. 1996). This object is
403: apparently bright for such a high-$z$ LBG ($V=20.6$) and thus
404: it provides a nice laboratory for investigations of young galaxies
405: (Pettini et al. 2000 and references therein).
406:
407: \subsubsection{Searches with a Narrowband Filter}
408:
409: Deep surveys for LAEs beyond $z=2$ with a narrowband filter were
410: already made in the early 1990s.
411: Thompson et al. (1995) used a Fabry-Perot interferometer to
412: search for LAEs with $z = 2.78$ - 4.89. Although their 1$\sigma$
413: limiting flux was down to $\sim 1.5 \times 10^{-17}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
414: over 0.05 deg$^2$ and $\sim 8.5 \times 10^{-17}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
415: over 0.63 deg$^2$, they found no LAE candidates.
416:
417: The first attempt by Cowie \& Hu (1998) with the Keck 10m telescope revealed
418: the presence of five Ly$\alpha$ emitters in HDF-N (N=North) and
419: seven in SSA22 at $z \approx 3.4$. The star formation rates of the LAEs are
420: several $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ and the star formation rate density is
421: $\rho_{\rm SFR} \sim 0.01 M_\odot$ Mpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$.
422: Subsequently, Steidel et al. (2000) also succeeded in
423: finding 77 LAE candidates at $z=3.1$ in a blank field around SSA22.
424: Furthermore, Kudritzki et al. (2000) found nine LAEs at $z=3.1$
425: during the course of their narrow-band imaging survey aimed at
426: looking for intracluster planetary nebulae in the Virgo cluster
427: (Mendez et al. 1997).
428:
429: Wide-field deep surveys were conducted by using
430: the Suprime-Cam mounted at the prime focus of
431: the 8.2 m Subaru telescope at Mauna Kea; note that
432: this camera covers a sky area of 34$^\prime \times 27^\prime$.
433: Using a narrowband filter centered at 7110 \AA ~ (NB711),
434: Ouchi et al. (2003) found 87 LAE candidates at $z=4.86$ in the Subaru
435: Deep Field (SDF: see for the SDF, Maihara et al. 2001).
436:
437: Fujita et al. (2003) used an intermediate band filter
438: with a resolution of $R=23$ centered at 5736 \AA ~ (IA574) on
439: Suprime-Cam in the Subaru XMM Deep Field (SXDF)
440: and found six LAE candidates at $z \approx 3.7$. This filter is one of
441: a set of special purpose filters designed for Suprime-Cam
442: (Hayashino et al. 2000; Taniguchi 2001).
443:
444: Similar wide-field deep surveys were also conducted by using
445: the CCD mosaic camera at the Kitt Peak National Observatory's 4m
446: Mayall telescope; i.e., the LALA survey [Rhoads et al. 2000;
447: Malhotra \& Rhoads 2002; see also section VI (b)].
448: This camera covers a sky area of $36^\prime \times 36^\prime$
449: and thus this is very suitable for all optical surveys.
450: Rhoads et al. (2000) used five narrowband filters centered at
451: 6559 \AA, 6611 \AA, 6650 \AA, 6682 \AA, and 6730 \AA, each of
452: which has a passband of $\approx$ 80 \AA. This filter set
453: made it possible to search for LAEs with $4.37 < z < 4.57$;
454: as well as for their search for LAEs at $z \approx 5.7$, see next section.
455:
456: We give a summary of
457: the blank-field surveys for Ly$\alpha$-emitters at $2 < z < 5$
458: in Table 3.
459:
460: %=======================================================
461: % Table 3
462: %=======================================================
463: {
464: \scriptsize
465: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
466: \tablenum{3}
467: \tablewidth{6.5in}
468: \tablecaption{%
469: A summary of the blank-field surveys for Ly$\alpha$-emitter at $2 < z < 5$
470: }
471:
472: \tablehead{
473: \colhead{Survey\tablenotemark{a}} &
474: \colhead{Field\tablenotemark{b}} &
475: \colhead{$z_{\rm c}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
476: \colhead{$(z_{\rm min}, z_{\rm max})$\tablenotemark{d}} &
477: \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{e}} &
478: \colhead{$EW_{\rm lim}({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{f}} &
479: \colhead{$N({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{g}} &
480: \colhead{$n({\rm Ly}\alpha)$\tablenotemark{h}}
481: }
482: \startdata
483: CH98 & HDF & 3.4 & (3.41, 3.47) & 5205 & 115 & 5 & $9.6 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
484: CH98 & SSA22 & 3.4 & (3.41, 3.47) & 5205 & 90 & 7 & $1.3 \times 10^{-3}$ \nl
485: K99 & HU Aqr & 2.4 & (2.32, 2.45) & 85338 & 241 & 1 & $1.2 \times 10^{-5}$ \nl
486: K99 & NGC 6251 & 2.4 & (2.32, 2.45) & 85338 & \nodata & 0 & 0 \nl
487: S00 & LBGS\tablenotemark{i} & 3.09 & (3.07, 3.12) & 16741 & 80 & 72
488: & $4.3 \times 10^{-3}$ \nl
489: K00 & Virgo\tablenotemark{j} & 3.14 & (3.12, 3.15) & 6020 & \nodata &
490: 8 & $1.3 \times 10^{-3}$ \nl
491: R00 & LALA\tablenotemark{k} & 4.4 & (4.37, 4.43) & 212000 &
492: 80 & 225 & $1.1 \times 10^{-3}$ \nl
493: M02 & LALA\tablenotemark{l} & 4.4 & (4.37, 4.57) & 740000 &
494: 80 & 157 & $2.1 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
495: O03 & SDF & 4.9 & (4.83, 4.89) & 89600 & 82 & 62\tablenotemark{m}
496: & $6.9 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
497: F03 & Subaru/XMM & 3.72 & (3.60, 3.83) & 93952 & 254 & 6
498: & $6.4 \times 10^{-5}$ \nl
499: \enddata
500: \tablenotetext{a}{CH98 = Cowie \& Hu (1998), K99 = Keel et al. (1999),
501: S00 = Steidel et al. (2000), K00 = Kudritzki et al. (2000), R00 =
502: Rhoads et al. (2000), M02 = Malhotra \& Rhoads (2002), O03 =
503: Ouchi et al. (2003), and F03 = Fujita et al. (2003).}
504: \tablenotetext{b}{The name of the targeted field.}
505: \tablenotetext{c}{The central redshift corresponding to the central
506: wavelength of the narrow-band filter ($\lambda_{\rm c}$).}
507: \tablenotetext{d}{The minimum and maximum redshift covered by the
508: narrow-band filter.}
509: \tablenotetext{e}{The co-moving volume covered by the survey in
510: units of $h_{0.7}^{-3}$ Mpc$^3$ with $\Omega_{\rm matter} = 0.3$
511: and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$.}
512: \tablenotetext{f}{The smallest equivalent width of the Ly$\alpha$ emission
513: detected in the survey in units of \AA ~ in the observed frame.}
514: \tablenotetext{g}{The number of Ly$\alpha$ emitters found in the survey.}
515: \tablenotetext{h}{The number density of Ly$\alpha$ emitters found in the survey
516: in units of $h_{0.7}^3$ Mpc$^{-3}$.}
517: \tablenotetext{i}{The LBG (Lyman break galaxies) spike region.}
518: \tablenotetext{j}{La Palma field (Mendez et al. 1997) in the Virgo cluster.}
519: \tablenotetext{k}{We refer only to their survey results with the NB6599 filter.}
520: \tablenotetext{l}{Five NB filters centered at 6559 \AA, 661 \AA, 6650 \AA,
521: 6692 \AA, and 6730 \AA are used.}
522: \tablenotetext{n}{They found 87 candidates in total. However, they secured that
523: 62 sources are much more reliable because of their $R-i^\prime$ colors.}
524: \end{deluxetable}
525: }
526:
527: \subsection{Gravitationally-Amplified-Field Surveys for
528: Ly$\alpha$ Emitters at $2 < z < 5$}
529:
530: Basically, there is no survey for LAEs at $2 < z < 5$
531: in a gravitationally-amplified field although this method
532: has been recently used to search for LAEs beyond $z=5$
533: (Ellis et al. 2001; Hu et al. 2002; see next section).
534: However, it is naturally understood that any help from
535: gravitational lensing is highly useful to find
536: distant LAEs because such LAEs are often very faint.
537: In order to demonstrate this, we introduce an epoch-making
538: serendipitous discovery of LAEs at $z=4.92$ by Franx et al.
539: in 1997.
540:
541: In order to study the observational properties of
542: member galaxies of the cluster Cl 1357+62
543: at $z = 0.33$, they obtained a large mosaic of multi-color
544: WFPC2 images of the cluster using HST. Franx et al. (1997)
545: found a red arc
546: in their image and then they obtained optical spectroscopy of this arc
547: using LRIS at Keck Observatory.
548: Surprisingly, they identified this arc as a LAE at $z=4.92$.
549: They further found that a companion galaxy is also a LAE
550: at nearly the same redshift (the velocity difference is only
551: 450 km s$^{-1}$). These objects were the most distant ones
552: up to 1997 and their redshifts were very close to $z=5$.
553: Their discovery surely encouraged
554: astronomers who are interested in forming galaxies in the early
555: universe. Indeed, a similar survey made by Frye et al. (2002)
556: resulted in the discovery of
557: eight LAEs at $3.7 < z < 5.2$ (seven are at $z <5$)
558: which were selected
559: from their red broad-band colors behind four massive clusters
560: of galaxies, Abell 1689, Abell 2219, Abell 2390, and AC 114.
561:
562: \section{LYMAN$\alpha$ EMITTERS BEYOND REDSHIFT 5}
563:
564: \subsection{Introduction}
565:
566: The recent advance provided by the 8-10m class telescopes
567: has also enabled us to carry out deep imaging searches for star-forming galaxies
568: beyond redshift 5.
569: In particular, imaging surveys using narrow-passband filters have
570: proved to be an efficient way to find such galaxies (Hu \&
571: McMahon 1996; Cowie \& Hu 1998; Steidel et al. 2000; Kudritzki et
572: al. 2000; Rhoads et al. 2001; Rhoads \& Malhotra 2001;
573: Hu et al. 2002; Ajiki et al. 2002). Indeed the most
574: distant Ly$\alpha$ emitter known to date, HCM 6A at $z=6.56$ has been
575: discovered by using this technique (Hu et al. 2002; see also Hu et al. 1998,
576: 1999; Ajiki et al. 2002).
577:
578: Other techniques also led to the discovery of
579: Ly$\alpha$ emitters beyond $z=5$ (Dey et al. 1998; Spinrad et al. 1998; Weymann
580: et al. 1998; Dawson et al. 2001, 2002; Ellis et al. 2001).
581: In this section, we give a summary of discoveries of LAEs beyond
582: $z=5$ based on various survey techniques.
583:
584: \subsection{Spectroscopic Follow-up of Objects found in
585: Deep Surveys}
586:
587: The Lyman break method applied to HDF-N brought a number of
588: candidate galaxies beyond $z=5$ (e.g, Lanzetta et al. 1996;
589: Madau et al. 1996). Subsequent spectroscopic observations
590: revealed that HDF 4-473.0 is really a LAE at $z=5.60$
591: (Weymann et al. 1998). Spinrad et al. (1998) also found two
592: galaxies (HDF 3-95.1 and HDF 3-95.2) at $z=5.34$.
593: Although these objects do not show strong Ly$\alpha$ emission,
594: they show a continuum break at $\lambda \simeq 7710$ \AA.
595: Two more galaxies beyond $z=5$ were found during a spectroscopic
596: survey of faint galaxies in the HDF-N flanking field;
597: F36218-1513 at $z=5.767$ and F36246-1511 at $z=5.631$ (Dawson et al. 2001).
598: More recently, Lehnert \& Bremer (2003) found five LAEs
599: beyond $z=5$ ($5.02 < z < 5.87$) from their high-$z$ LBG candidates.
600:
601: \subsection{Serendipitous Discoveries of LAEs beyond $z=5$}
602:
603: The first galaxy beyond $z=5$ was found serendipitously; 0140+326
604: RD1 at $z=5.34$ (Dey et al. 1998). This object was found during
605: their search for LBGs at $z \sim 4$.
606: Dawson et al. (2002) also found a LAE at $z=5.190$ serendipitously.
607: This object, J123649.2+621539, was found in a long-slit spectrum
608: of Keck/ESI during their spectroscopic search for faint galaxies
609: in the HDF-N NW flanking field. As summarized in Table 4, we know
610: 25 confirmed (or most probable)
611: LAEs beyond $z=5$. Among them, two are serendipitously
612: discovered. This high discovery rate seems to be attributed to
613: the great observational capability in spectroscopy with 8-10m telescopes.
614:
615: \subsection{Surveys with a Narrowband Filter}
616:
617: Recent surveys with a narrowband filter have been
618: finding a number of LAEs beyond $z=5$.
619: However, such surveys
620: have the following two limitations.
621: The first limitation comes from strong OH airglow emission lines.
622: In Fig. 1, we show an
623: optical spectrum of OH airglow emission lines which is kindly
624: supplied by Alan Stockton (see also Stockton 1999).
625: Although there can be seen several gaps at which there is little
626: strong OH emission, OH emission dominates at wavelengths longer than
627: 7000 \AA. This prevents us from finding very faint galaxies at high redshift.
628: The well-defined gaps appear around $\lambda \approx$ 7110 \AA, 8160 \AA,
629: and 9210 \AA. These gaps enable us to search for LAEs at
630: $z \approx$ 4.8 (Rhoads et al. 2000; Ouchi et al. 2003), 5.7
631: (Hu et al. 1998; Ajiki et al. 2002, 2003; Taniguchi et al. 2003), and 6.6
632: (Hu et al. 2002; Kodaira et al. 2003).
633:
634: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
635: % Fig. 1 (OH)
636: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
637: \begin{figure}
638: \epsfysize=5.5cm \epsfbox{fig1.eps}
639: %\plotone{fig1.eps}
640: %\vspace{10cm}
641: \caption[]{
642: Optical spectrum of OH airglow emission lines
643: taken from Stockton (1999).
644: The three narrowband filter bands, NB711, NB816, and NB921,
645: are shown by horizontal bars, all of that are available
646: for the Suprime-Cam on the Subaru Telescope.
647: \label{fig1}
648: }
649: \end{figure}
650:
651: The second limitation is that survey volumes are so small because of
652: narrower band widths (e.g., $\sim 100$ \AA). In order to gain survey volumes
653: and to reach faint limiting magnitudes,
654: we need wide-field CCD cameras on 8-10m class telescopes.
655: The Suprime-Cam mounted at the prime focus of
656: the 8.2 m Subaru telescope at Mauna Kea provides a unique
657: opportunity for wide-field (a $34^\prime \times 27^\prime$ field of view),
658: narrowband imaging surveys for emission-line objects at high redshift.
659: The efficiency of this instrument is higher by a factor of 30
660: than typical imagers mounted on the other 8-10m class telescopes.
661:
662: Since the first
663: detection of a galaxy beyond $z=5$ (Dey et al. 1998), more than twenty such
664: galaxies have been found (Table 4). The most distant one known to date is HCM
665: 6A whose redshift is 6.56 (Hu et al. 2002), farther than the most distant
666: quasar known, SDSSp J114816.64+525150.3 at $z=6.43$ (Fan et al. 2003).
667:
668: Hu et al. (2002) made imaging surveys of LAEs at $z \approx 6.6$
669: for the following six fields using
670: the LRIS on Keck I; three blank fields (HDF-N, SSA 17, and SSA 22) and
671: three cluster fields around Abell 370, Abell 851, and Abell 2390.
672: Then they found several LAE candidates in their surveys
673: (Esther Hu, private communication) and confirmed
674: that HCM-6A found in the Abell 370 field
675: is a LAE at $z=6.56$. This object shows a significant
676: continuum break at wavelengths shorter than the Ly$\alpha$ line peak
677: and the relatively flat UV continuum emission. All these features
678: are expected for a very young, forming galaxy at such a high redshift
679: (e.g., Meier 1976). The unlensed Ly$\alpha$ flux leads to a star
680: formation rate of $\sim 3 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ with the adopted cosmology.
681:
682: Recently, some new survey results with narrowband filters with the Suprime-Cam
683: on the 8.2 m Subaru telescope have appeared.
684: First, our group made a deep survey for LAEs at $z=5.7$
685: (Ajiki et al. 2003) guided by one of the very high-$z$ SDSS quasars,
686: SDSSp J104433.04$-$012502.2 at $z=5.74$ (Fan et al. 2000).
687: They found approximately twenty LAE candidates and already confirmed
688: spectroscopically two LAEs at $z=5.69$ (Ajiki et al. 2002)
689: and $z=5.66$ (Taniguchi et al. 2003).
690: More recently, Kodaira et al. (2003) made a deep imaging survey for
691: LAEs at $z \approx 6.6$ using the NB921 filter with the Suprime-cam.
692: They succeeded in identifying LAEs at
693: $z=6.51$ and $z=6.58$ in the SDF [see also section VI (c)].
694: The latter LAE is more distant than HCM-6A at $z=6.56$.
695: These successful results reinforce that this method is highly useful in
696: searching for high-$z$ LAEs.
697:
698: \subsection{Summary}
699:
700: To conclude we give a summary in Table 4 of all the galaxies beyond
701: redshift 5 in the literature. New
702: discoveries of LAEs at $z>5$ recently reported (Rhoads et al.
703: 2003; Lehnert \& Bremer 2003; Kodaira et al. 2003) are also
704: included in this table. However, we do not include a LAE
705: candidate at $z=6.5926$ found by Lehnert \& Bremer (2003)
706: because it seems necessary to obtain a high-resolution spectrum
707: for the confirmation.
708: We also do not include the object at $z=6.68$ reported by
709: Chen et al. (1999) because this redshift is not confirmed by later
710: observations (Stern et al. 2000b; Chen et al. 2000).
711: The radio galaxy, TN J0924$-$2201 at $z=5.19$ (van Breugel et al. 1999)
712: is not included too, because this source is an AGN.
713:
714: As shown in Table 4, recent optical follow-up spectroscopy has used
715: high-resolution spectrographs like ESI (Sheinis et al. 2000)
716: rather than low-resolution ones
717: like LRIS. The reason for this is that there is a clear advantage in using
718: high-resolution ($R >$ 2000 - 3000) spectroscopy to extract Ly$\alpha$ from
719: the forest of OH airglow lines above $\sim$ 7000 \AA ~ beyond $z \sim$ 5
720: (see also Stern \& Spinrad 1999).
721: High spectral
722: resolution will be particularly important in future searches for
723: subgalactic Ly$\alpha$ emitters at high redshift if the narrow Ly$\alpha$
724: profiles found in Abell 2218 (Ellis et al. 2001) and LAE J1044$-$0123
725: (Taniguchi et al. 2003) are typical of distant
726: emission-line objects (see section VI).
727:
728:
729: %-----------------------------------------------------
730: % Table 4
731: %-----------------------------------------------------
732: {
733: \scriptsize
734: \begin{deluxetable}{rlcccccc}
735: \tablenum{4}
736: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
737: \tablecaption{A summary of galaxies beyond redshift 5}
738: \tablewidth{0pt}
739: \tablehead{
740: \colhead{No.} &
741: \colhead{Name} &
742: \colhead{Redshift} &
743: \colhead{$f$(Ly$\alpha$)\tablenotemark{a}} &
744: \colhead{$L$(Ly$\alpha$)\tablenotemark{b}} &
745: \colhead{Method\tablenotemark{c}} &
746: \colhead{Sp. Mode\tablenotemark{d}} &
747: \colhead{Ref.\tablenotemark{e}}
748: }
749: \startdata
750: 1 & SDF J132418.3+271455 & 6.578 & 2.1 & 10.0 & NB & L & 1 \\
751: 2 & HCM 6A & 6.56 & 2.7 & 3.3 & NB & L & 2 \\
752: 3 & SDF J132415.7+273058 & 6.541 & 1.1 & 5.6 & NB & L & 1 \\
753: 4 & LAE @ 0226-04 Field & 6.17 & 3.9 & 17 & SF & L & 3 \\
754: 5 & BDF 1:19 & 5.8696 & 0.31 & 1.2 & SF & L & 4 \\
755: 6 & F36218-1513 & 5.767 & \nodata & \nodata & SF & L & 5 \\
756: 7 & LALA J142546.76+352036.3 & 5.746 & 1.9 & 6.7 & NB & L & 6 \\
757: 8 & BDF 1:10 & 5.7441 & 2.4 & 8.7 & SF & L & 4 \\
758: 9 & SSA22-HCM1 & 5.74 & 1.7 & 6.1 & NB & L & 7 \\
759: 10 & LALA J142647.16+353612.6 & 5.700 & 3.9 & 14 & NB & L & 6 \\
760: 11 & LAE J1044$-$0130 & 5.687 & 1.5 & 5.2 & NB & H & 8 \\
761: 12 & LALA J142630.34+354022.5 & 5.674 & 2.7 & 9.3 & NB & L & 6 \\
762: 13 & LAE J1044$-$0123 & 5.655 & 4.1 & 14 & NB & H & 9 \\
763: 14 & BDF 2:19 & 5.6488 & 2.5 & 8.7 & SF & L & 4 \\
764: 15 & BR1202$-$0725 LAE & 5.64 & \nodata & \nodata & NB & L & 10 \\
765: 16 & F36246-1511 & 5.631 & \nodata & \nodata & SF & L & 5 \\
766: 17 & HDF 4-473.0 & 5.60 & 1.0 & 3.4 & SF & L & 11 \\
767: 18 & Abell 2218 a\tablenotemark{f} & 5.576 & 6.2\tablenotemark{g}
768: & 0.64 & SF & L/H & 12 \\
769: 19 & 0140+326 RD1 & 5.348 & 3.5 & 11 & SD & L & 13 \\
770: 20 & HDF 3-951.1 & 5.34 & \nodata & \nodata & SF & L & 14 \\
771: 21 & HDF 3-951.2 & 5.34 & \nodata & \nodata & SF & L & 14 \\
772: 22 & J123649.2+621539 & 5.190 & 3.0 & 8.5 & SD & H & 15 \\
773: 23 & Abell 1689\_3 & 5.120 & \nodata & \nodata & SF & L & 16 \\
774: 24 & BDF 1:26 & 5.0558 & 0.35 & 0.93 & SF & L & 4 \\
775: 25 & BDF 1:18 & 5.0175 & 0.24 & 0.63 & SF & L & 4 \\
776: \enddata
777: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed Ly$\alpha$ flux in units of
778: $10^{-17}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.
779: }
780: \tablenotetext{b}{Absolute Ly$\alpha$ luminosity in units of
781: $10^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$. If the source is lensed
782: (i.e., HCM 6A and Abell 2218 a), we give
783: the unlensed luminosity estimated in the reference.
784: }
785: \tablenotetext{c}{Discovery method. NB = imaging survey
786: with a narrow-passband filter, SF = spectroscopic follow-up in
787: the field of targeted object, and SD = serendipitous discovery.}
788: \tablenotetext{d}{All the spectroscopic observations were made using
789: either LRIS or ESI or both on the W. M. Keck Observatory.
790: The Echelle mode of ESI provides a high-resolution spectroscopy
791: (denoted as ^^ ^^ H"; the spectral resolution is higher than
792: 3000) and the low-resolution mode of ESI and LRIS
793: provide a low-resolution spectroscopy (denoted as ^^ ^^ L";
794: the spectral resolution is lower than 1000).
795: }
796: \tablenotetext{e}{1. Kodaira et al. 2003, 2. Hu et al. 2002,
797: 3. Cuby et al. 2003, 4. Lehnert
798: \& Bremer 2003, 5. Dawson et al. 2001, 6. Rhoads et al. 2003, 7. Hu et al.
799: 1999, 8. Ajiki et al. 2002, 9. Taniguchi et al. 2003, 10. Hu et al. 1998,
800: 11. Weymann et al. 1998,
801: 12. Ellis et al. 2001, 13. Dey et al. 1998, 14. Spinrad et al. 1998,
802: 15. Dawson et al. 2002, and 16. Frye et al. 2002.
803: }
804: \tablenotetext{f}{Another Ly$\alpha$ emitter Abell 2218 b
805: is found at the same redshift. But this is the counter lensed
806: image of Abell 2218 a.
807: }
808: \tablenotetext{g}{In Ellis et al. (2001), the Ly$\alpha$ fluxes obtained
809: with both Keck LRIS and ESI are given. The Ly$\alpha$ flux
810: given in this table is their average.
811: }
812: \end{deluxetable}
813: }
814:
815:
816: %%%%%%%%%%%%% High-z Superwind %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
817: \section{SUPERWINDS AT HIGH REDSHIFT}
818:
819: \subsection{Introduction}
820:
821: Superwind phenomena are often observed in nearby starburst galaxies
822: such as M82 (e.g., Ohyama et al. 2003a and references therein;
823: see for a review Taniguchi et al. 1988;
824: Heckman et al. 1990). If bursts of massive star formation
825: occurred in a forming galaxy and the kinetic energy released from
826: the collective explosions of supernovae exceeds the gravitational
827: potential energy of the system, a superwind could blow
828: from this young galaxy. The presence of luminous LAEs at
829: high redshift suggests strongly that superwind phenomena are
830: also common for such forming galaxies.
831:
832: Historically, galactic wind models have been applied to the
833: formation of elliptical galaxies in terms of the monolithic
834: collapse scenario (e.g., Larson 1974; Arimoto \& Yoshii 1987).
835: Such monolithic collapse models are now considered
836: to be unlikely because hierarchical clustering models (i.e.,
837: cold dark matter models) provide successful explanations of
838: the structure formation in the universe (e.g., Peebles 1993).
839: Nevertheless, it is also known that galactic wind models
840: appear consistent with many observational properties of
841: elliptical galaxies in the local universe.
842: This dilemma may be reconciled if we consider the following
843: situation.
844: It is not necessarily to presume
845: that a pregalactic cloud is a first-generation gigantic gas cloud.
846: If a number of subgalactic gas clouds are assembled into one and then
847: a starburst occurs in its central region, the physical situation
848: seems to be nearly the same as that of the monolithic collapse.
849:
850: In the galactic wind scenario,
851: the initial starburst occurs at the epoch of galaxy formation
852: in the galaxy center.
853: Subsequently, massive stars die and then a large number of
854: supernovae appear. These supernovae could overlap and then evolve
855: into a so-called superbubble. If the kinetic energy deposited to the
856: surrounding gas overcomes the gravitational potential energy of the
857: galaxy, the gas clouds are blown out into the intergalactic space
858: as a superwind (e.g., Heckman et al. 1990).
859: Galactic superwinds are now considered to be one of the key issues for
860: understanding the interaction and evolution of both galaxies and
861: intergalactic matter (e.g. Heckman 1999; Taniguchi \& Shioya 2001).
862: In order to improve our knowledge of galactic superwinds at high
863: redshift, a large sample of superwind candidates at $z > 3$ is necessary.
864: Recent optical observations have found some possible candidates
865: for superwind galaxies at $z > 5$ (Dawson et al. 2002;
866: Ajiki et al. 2002; see also Frye et al. 2002).
867: In this section, we give a summary of such observations.
868:
869: \subsection{J123649.2+621539 at $z=5.19$}
870:
871: One interesting object among the LAEs given in Table 1
872: is J123649.2+621539 at $z=5.190$
873: which was found serendipitously in the HDF-North flanking fields
874: (Dawson et al. 2002). Its Ly$\alpha$ emission-line profile shows a
875: sharp blue cutoff and broad red wing emission, both of which are often
876: observed in star-forming systems with prominent wind outflows. These
877: features are also expected from radiative transfer in an expanding
878: envelope. Therefore, Dawson et al. (2002) suggested that the
879: Ly$\alpha$ profile of J123649.2+621539 is consistent with a superwind
880: with a velocity of $\sim$ 300 km s$^{-1}$; the Ly$\alpha$ line can be
881: decomposed to the following three components, (1) a narrow central emission
882: component with $FWHM$ = 280 km s$^{-1}$, (2) a broad emission component
883: with $FWHM$ = 560 km s$^{-1}$ redshifted by 320 km s$^{-1}$ from the central
884: component, and (3) a broad absorption component with $FWHM$ = 800 km s$^{-1}$
885: blueshifted by 360 km s$^{-1}$ from the central one.
886:
887: Such superwind activities are expected to be related to the escape
888: of Lyman continuum photons because the velocity gradient in superwinds
889: could increase the escape fraction. However, Dawson et al. (2002) obtained
890: a very small escape fraction, $f_{\rm esc} \sim 0.1 \pm 0.3$. On the other hand,
891: Steidel et al. (2001) obtained $f_{\rm esc} \gtrsim 0.5$
892: for 29 Lyman break galaxies at $<z>=3.40 \pm 0.09$.
893: In order to improve the measurement of $f_{\rm esc}$ for LAEs at $z>5$,
894: we need a much larger sample of superwind galaxies at $z>5$.
895:
896: \subsection{LAE J1044-0130 at $z=5.69$}
897:
898: During the course of a new search for Ly$\alpha$ emitters at
899: $z \approx 5.7$ using Subaru Telescope, Ajiki et al. (2002) found a
900: candidate superwind galaxy at $z =
901: 5.69$. Its optical thumbnails and optical spectrum are shown in
902: Figs. 2 and 3, respectively.
903: Its emission-line shape shows the sharp cutoff at wavelengths
904: shortward of the line peak and the presence of
905: the excess red-wing emission seems secure (Fig. 3). The $FWHM$ of the
906: Ly$\alpha$ emission is measured to be 340$\pm$110 km s$^{-1}$ and the
907: full width at zero intensity (FWZI) is estimated to be 890$\pm$110 km
908: s$^{-1}$. These properties are similar to those of the Ly$\alpha$ emitter
909: at $z=5.190$, J123649.2+621539, found by Dawson et al. (2002).
910:
911: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
912: % Fig. 2 Thumbnails of LAE 1044-0130
913: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
914: \begin{figure}
915: \epsfysize=6.0cm \epsfbox{fig2.ps}
916: %\plotone{fig2.ps}
917: %\vspace{10cm}
918: \caption[]{
919: Thumbnail images of LAE J1044-0130 (upper panel)
920: also displayed as contours (middle panel) taken from Ajiki et al. (2002).
921: The angular size of the circle
922: in each panel corresponds to 8$\arcsec$. The lower panel shows
923: the spectral energy distribution (in magnitudes). From our optical
924: spectroscopy, we find that
925: a galaxy located at 2$\farcs$4 northeast of LAE J1044$-$0130 shows
926: two emission lines at $\lambda \simeq 6710 - 6720$~\AA.
927: Since these lines can be identified as the [O
928: {\sc ii}]$\lambda$3727 doublet redshifted to $z=0.802 \pm 0.002$
929: (see Figure 9).
930: This foreground galaxy might enhance
931: the image of LAE J1044$-$0130 due to gravitational lensing.
932: However, since there is no counter image of the LAE J1044$-$0130
933: in our deep NB816
934: image, the magnification factor might be less than a factor of 2
935: (Shioya et al. 2002b).
936: \label{fig2}
937: }
938: \end{figure}
939:
940: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
941: % Fig. 3 ESI Spectrum of LAE 1044-0130
942: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
943: \begin{figure}
944: \epsfysize=8.0cm \epsfbox{fig3.ps}
945: %\plotone{fig3.ps}
946: %\vspace{10cm}
947: \caption[]{
948: The optical spectrogram (upper panel)
949: and one-dimensional spectrum (middle panel) of LAE J1044-0130
950: obtained with ESI on Keck II ($R \sim 3400$) taken from Ajiki et al. (2002).
951: The model profile fit is
952: shown by the thick solid curve (see text). Sky (OH airglow) emission
953: lines are shown in the lower panel.
954: \label{fig3}
955: }
956: \end{figure}
957:
958:
959: We note that approximately half of the intrinsic Ly$\alpha$
960: emission from LAE J1044-0130 could be absorbed by intergalactic atomic
961: hydrogen (e.g., Dawson et al. 2002). In order to reproduce the
962: observed Ly$\alpha$ emission-line profile a two-component profile fit
963: was made using the following assumptions:\ 1) the intrinsic Ly$\alpha$
964: emission line profile is Gaussian, and 2) the optical depth of the
965: Ly$\alpha$ absorption increases with decreasing wavelength shortward
966: of the rest-frame Ly$\alpha$ peak. The resulting fit is shown in
967: Fig. 3 (thick curve), which corresponds to the following emission
968: and absorption line parameters. [1] Ly$\alpha$ emission: the line
969: center, $\lambda_{\rm c, em} = 8031$ \AA, the line flux, $f_{\rm
970: em} \simeq 2.4 \times 10^{-17}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, and the line
971: width, $FWHM_{\rm em} \simeq 650$ km s$^{-1}$; [2] Ly$\alpha$
972: absorption: the line center, $\lambda_{\rm c, abs} = 8123$ \AA, the
973: optical depth at the absorption center, $\tau_{\rm abs} \simeq 10$,
974: and the line width, $FWHM_{\rm abs} \simeq 175$ km s$^{-1}$. This
975: analysis suggests that the total Ly$\alpha$ emission-line flux amounts
976: to $1.7 \times 10^{-17}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. Then the absorption
977: corrected, total Ly$\alpha$
978: luminosity is estimated as $L$(Ly$\alpha$) $\sim 6.1 \times 10^{42} ~ h_{0.7}^{-2}$
979: ergs s$^{-1}$, giving the star formation rate,
980: $SFR \simeq 6 ~h_{0.7}^{-2} ~ M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
981:
982: \subsection{Lyman$\alpha$ Blobs at $z \approx 3.1$}
983:
984: Recent narrow-band imaging surveys have revealed the presence of
985: very extended Ly$\alpha$ emitters at high redshift, $z \sim$ 2 - 3
986: (Keel et al. 1999; Steidel et al. 2000).
987: Three sources found by Keel et al. (1999) are all strong C {\sc iv} emitters
988: (Pascarelle et al. 1996), and thus
989: they are photoionized by the central engine of active galactic
990: nuclei (AGNs).
991: On the other hand, since two sources found by Steidel et al. (2000) have no evidence
992: for the association with AGNs, their origin has been in debate.
993: These two sources are called Ly$\alpha$ blobs (LABs).
994: The observational properties of the LABs found by Steidel et al. (2000)
995: are summarized as follows;
996: 1) the observed Ly$\alpha$ luminosities are $\sim 10^{43}$
997: ergs s$^{-1}$, 2) they appear elongated morphologically,
998: 3) their sizes amount to $\sim$ 100 kpc,
999: 4) the observed line widths amount to $\sim 1000$ km s$^{-1}$,
1000: 5) they are not associated with strong radio-continuum sources
1001: such as powerful radio galaxies, and
1002: 6) they are strong submm emitters (Chapman et al. 2001).
1003:
1004: As for the origin of LABs, two alternative ideas have been proposed.
1005: One is that these LABs are
1006: superwinds driven by the initial starburst in galaxies because all the above
1007: properties as well as the observed frequency of LABs can be explained
1008: in terms of the superwind model
1009: (Taniguchi \& Shioya 2000). More recently, Taniguchi, Shioya, \&
1010: Kakazu (2001) found that the observed
1011: spectral energy distribution of one of them, LAB1, found by Steidel et al.
1012: (2000) is quite similar to that of Arp 220 which is a typical ultraluminous
1013: starburst/superwind galaxy in the local universe.
1014: This suggests strongly that the superwind model proposed by
1015: Taniguchi \& Shioya (2000) is applicable to LAB1.
1016: It is remarkable that LAB1 is more luminous in the infrared by a factor of
1017: 20 than Arp 220, and thus Taniguchi et al. (2001) suggest that
1018: LAB1 is an archetypical example of the hyperwind galaxy.
1019:
1020: The other idea is that LABs are cooling radiation from protogalaxies
1021: in dark matter halos (Haiman, Spaans, \& Quataert 2000; Fardal et al. 2001;
1022: see also Fabian et al. 1986; Hu 1992). Standard cold dark matter models
1023: predict that a large number of dark matter halos collapse at high redshift
1024: and they can emit significant Ly$\alpha$ fluxes through collisional excitation
1025: of hydrogen. These Ly$\alpha$ emitting halos are also consistent with
1026: the observed linear sizes, velocity widths, and Ly$\alpha$ fluxes of the
1027: LABs. However, it is uncertain how much far infrared and submillimeter
1028: continuum emission can be emitted because little is known about the dust content
1029: and its spatial distribution in such dark matter halos.
1030: However, this model cannot explain the huge submm luminosity observed in
1031: LAB1 (Chapman et al. 2001). Therefore, the superwind model is much preferred.
1032: Recent optical spectroscopy of LAB1 using Subaru telescope
1033: also suggested that LAB1 is a superwind galaxy (Ohyama et al. 2003b).
1034:
1035: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1036: % Fig. 4 (SED of LAB1)
1037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1038: \begin{figure}
1039: \epsfysize=12.0cm \epsfbox{fig4.ps}
1040: %\plotone{fig4.eps}
1041: %\vspace{10cm}
1042: \caption[]{
1043: Spectral energy distribution of LAB1 taken from Taniguchi et al. (2001).
1044: The $R$- and $K$-band photometric data of the source K are shown by
1045: filled circles while those of C11 are shown by open circles
1046: (see Steidel et al. 2000).
1047: For comparison,
1048: we show the SEDs of Arp 220 (solid line), NGC 6240 (dotted line),
1049: and SMM 02399$-$0136 (dashed line).
1050: \label{fig4}
1051: }
1052: \end{figure}
1053:
1054: In summary, it is likely that LABs are superwinds at $z \sim 3$.
1055: Another merit of the superwind model is that there seems to be a natural
1056: evolutionary link from
1057: dust-enshrouded (or dusty) submm sources (hereafter DSSs) to LABs
1058: because the central starburst region in a forming elliptical galaxy
1059: could be enshrouded by a lot of gas with dust grains (Taniguchi \& Shioya 2000).
1060: Their scenario is summarized as follows;
1061: Step I: The initial starburst occurs in the center of pregalactic gas cloud.
1062: Step II: This galaxy may be hidden by surrounding gas clouds for
1063: the first several times $10^8$ years (i.e., the DSS phase).
1064: Step III: The superwind blows and thus the DSS phase ceases.
1065: The superwind leads to the formation of extended emission-line regions
1066: around the galaxy (i.e., the LAB phase).
1067: This lasts for a duration of $\sim 1 \times 10^8$ years.
1068: And, Step IV: The galaxy evolves to an ordinary elliptical galaxy
1069: $\sim 10^9$ years after the formation.
1070: This superwind model predicts that the LABs are bright at
1071: rest-frame far-infrared if they are high-redshift, luminous analogues
1072: of nearby superwind galaxies like Arp 220.
1073:
1074: \subsection{Chain Galaxies}
1075:
1076: One interesting new population of galaxies at high redshift are
1077: chain galaxies (Cowie et al. 1995; van den Bergh et al. 1996;
1078: see Table 5).
1079: Cowie et al. (1995) found 28 candidates of such chain galaxies
1080: in their deep {\it HST} $I$ band (F814W) images of the
1081: two Hawaii deep survey fields, SSA 13 and SSA 22.
1082: van den Bergh et al. (1996) also identified such chain galaxies
1083: in the Hubble Deep Field-North (Williams et al. 1996);
1084: HDF 2--234 (the tadpole or head-tail galaxy) and
1085: HDF 3--531 (the chain galaxy).
1086: The chain galaxies tend to be very straight in morphology and their average
1087: major-to-minor axial ratio is $\sim$ 5.
1088: Based on these observational properties,
1089: Cowie et al. (1995) proposed that the chain galaxies comprise
1090: a new population of forming galaxies
1091: at high redshift ($z \sim$ 0.5 -- 3)
1092: because they are bluer on average
1093: than galaxies with similar $I$ magnitudes studied by them.
1094: In particular, they are very blue in
1095: $B - K$, suggesting that they are not relatively normal
1096: galaxies in the rest ultraviolet band and that the peculiar
1097: morphologies are not a consequence of the distribution of the
1098: star-forming regions.
1099:
1100: %-----------------------------------------------------
1101: % Table 5
1102: %-----------------------------------------------------
1103: {
1104: \scriptsize
1105: \tablenum{5}
1106: \tablewidth{6.5in}
1107: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
1108: \tablecaption{%
1109: Chain galaxies found by Cowie et al. (1995) and van den Bergh et al. (1996)
1110: }
1111: \tablehead{
1112: \colhead{} &
1113: \colhead{Cowie et al. (1995)} &
1114: \colhead{van den Bergh et al (1996)}
1115: }
1116: \startdata
1117: Field & SSA 13 \& SSA 22 & HDF-N \nl
1118: Area & 10.7 arcmin$^2$ & 5.3 arcmin$^2$ \nl
1119: $N_{\rm chain}(I_{814} \leq 25)$\tablenotemark{a} & 24 & 11 \nl
1120: $N_{\rm chain}(I_{814} > 25)$\tablenotemark{b} & 4 & \nodata \nl
1121: $\sigma_{\rm chain}(I_{814} \leq 25)$\tablenotemark{c} & 2.2 arcmin$^{-2}$ &
1122: 2.1 arcmin$^{-2}$ \nl
1123: $\sigma_{\rm chain}(I_{814} > 25)$\tablenotemark{d} & 0.4 arcmin$^{-2}$ & \nodata \nl
1124: $<a/b>$\tablenotemark{e} & $4.8 \pm 2.1$ & $3.1 \pm 1.3$ \nl
1125: \enddata
1126: \tablenotetext{a}{The observed number of chain galaxies with $I_{814} \leq 25$.}
1127: \tablenotetext{b}{The observed number of chain galaxies with $I_{814} > 25$.}
1128: \tablenotetext{c}{The surface density of chain galaxies with $I_{814} \leq 25$.}
1129: \tablenotetext{d}{The surface density of chain galaxies with $I_{814} > 25$.}
1130: \tablenotetext{e}{The average value of apparent major-to-minor axial ratio.}
1131: \end{deluxetable}
1132: }
1133:
1134: As for a possible formation mechanism of chain galaxies,
1135: Taniguchi \& Shioya (2001) proposed the following scenario.
1136: Successive merging of subgalactic gas clumps results in
1137: the formation of a galaxy with a mass of $10^{11-12} M_\odot$
1138: at redshift $z \sim 5$.
1139: Subsequently, supernova explosions occur inside the galaxy
1140: and then blow out as a galactic wind (or a superwind).
1141: This wind expands into the intergalactic space and then causes a
1142: large-scale shell with a radius of several hundreds of kpc.
1143: Since this radius may be smaller than the typical separation between
1144: galaxies, interactions of shells may also occur, resulting in
1145: the formation of a large-scale gaseous slab.
1146: Since the shell or the slab can be regarded as a gaseous sheet,
1147: filament-like gravitational instability is expected to occur.
1148: Further gravitational instability occurs in each filament,
1149: leading to intense star formation along the filament. This is the
1150: chain galaxy phase.
1151: The filament collapses gravitationally into one spheroidal
1152: system like an elliptical galaxy within one dynamical timescale of
1153: the filament ($\sim 10^8$ yr). Therefore, it seems quite difficult
1154: to identify remnants of chain galaxies.
1155: Since forming galaxies with massive stars could often experience
1156: the superwind phase in their early lives, this idea may remain
1157: as a plausible mechanism.
1158:
1159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1160: % Fig. 5 (Chain galaxies)
1161: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1162: \begin{figure}
1163: \epsfysize=9.5cm \epsfbox{fig5.ps}
1164: %\plotone{fig5.ps}
1165: %\vspace{10cm}
1166: \caption[]{
1167: A schematic illustration of the proposed formation mechanism
1168: of chain galaxies taken from Taniguchi \& Shioya (2001).
1169: \label{fig5}
1170: }
1171: \end{figure}
1172:
1173: \subsection{Possible Relation to Quasar Absorption Line Systems}
1174:
1175: Shocked shells driven by superwinds have been often discussed as
1176: possible agents of some quasar absorption line systems such as
1177: Lyman limit absorption systems (LLSs)
1178: and damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption systems (DLAs)
1179: (Ostriker \& Cowie 1981; Ikeuchi 1981; Chernomordik \& Ozernoy 1983;
1180: Ostriker \& Ikeuchi 1983; Voit 1996).
1181: Indeed, the H {\sc i} column densities of shocked shells driven
1182: by superwinds are expected to
1183: be $N_{\rm HI} \gtrsim 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$ (e.g., Taniguchi \&
1184: Shioya 2001); note that LLSs have $N_{\rm HI} \gtrsim 10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$
1185: (e.g., Steidel 1990).
1186: If we see such shells from a highly inclined angle (e.g., $\theta_{\rm view}
1187: \gtrsim 80^\circ$) or their tangential sections,
1188: the H {\sc i} column density exceeds $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$,
1189: causing damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption systems (DLAs,
1190: e.g., Peebles 1993; Wolfe et al. 1995).
1191: It is also possible that DLAs may arise
1192: in the last stages of gravitational collapse of the filaments
1193: just as star formation commences.
1194: Small cloudlets breaking into the intergalactic medium (IGM)
1195: may be observed as Ly$\alpha$ forests
1196: with $N_{\rm HI} \lesssim 10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$.
1197:
1198: The superwind scenario may have the following merits.
1199: One is that the projected
1200: distance up to several hundreds kpc is acceptable because
1201: the absorbing agents are gas clouds in the shocked shells.
1202: The second merit is
1203: the metal enrichment in the IGM because the superwind
1204: contains a lot of heavy elements.
1205: It has been argued that supernova explosions lead to the chemical
1206: enrichment of the IGM at high redshift (e.g., Ostriker \& Gnedin 1996;
1207: Miralda-Escud\'e \& Rees 1997).
1208: We estimate the metal enrichment due to the superwind.
1209: The mass of metal ejected from a star is $m_Z = \epsilon_Z m_*$
1210: where $\epsilon_Z$ is the mass fraction of metal with respect to
1211: the stellar mass. Thus the total metal enrichment due to the
1212: superwind can be estimated as
1213:
1214: \begin{equation}
1215: \Delta Z ={{\epsilon_Z m_* N_{\rm SN}} \over
1216: {M_{\rm shell}}} \simeq 4.2 \times 10^{-3} \epsilon_Z
1217: \end{equation}
1218: where we adopt $m_* = 10 M_\odot$ as the typical mass of progenitors of
1219: type II supernovae.
1220: We then obtain $\Delta Z \simeq 4.2 \times 10^{-4}$ if $\epsilon_Z = 0.1$.
1221: Since the metal abundance observed in
1222: Ly$\alpha$ forests (e.g., Pettini et al. 1997; Songaila \&
1223: Cowie 1996; Lu et al. 1998) is
1224: of the order of 0.01 $Z_\odot$ where $Z_\odot$ is the solar metal
1225: abundance in mass ($Z_\odot = 0.02$); i.e., $Z_{\rm IGM}
1226: \simeq 2 \times 10^{-4}$. Therefore, the metal
1227: ejection as a result of the superwind from a forming massive galaxy
1228: may be responsible for the observed metal abundance in the IGM
1229: at high redshift.
1230:
1231: Spectroscopic evidence for such a shocked-shell absorber
1232: was obtained for two Mg {\sc ii} absorbers at $1<z<2$ (Bond
1233: et al. 2001). These Mg {\sc ii} absorbers show symmetry-inverted
1234: structure; i.e., the absorption profile has a sharp drop in optical depth
1235: near the center of the profile and strong black-bottomed absorption
1236: on either side. Future searches for such the symmetry-inverted
1237: structure in higher redshift absorbers will be recommended.
1238: Since it takes $\sim$ 1 Gyr to develop large-scale superwind-driven
1239: bubbles (e.g., Arimoto \& Yoshii 1987), the presence of
1240: superwind activity gives us information on the formation redshift
1241: of galaxies; e.g., if the formation redshift is
1242: $z_{\rm f} \sim 10$, we may observe superwinds at $z \sim 3$
1243: preferentially. Therefore, any searches for superwinds beyond $z=5$
1244: will provide strong constraints on the formation epoch of massive
1245: star formation beyond $z=10$.
1246:
1247: \section{SUBGALACTIC POPULATIONS AT HIGH REDSHIFT}
1248:
1249: \subsection{Introduction}
1250:
1251: Hierarchical models of structure formation imply that galaxies were
1252: constructed through successive mergers of smaller gaseous clumps
1253: (``building blocks'') in the early universe. This assembly process is
1254: presumed to have taken place from 0.5 to a few Gyrs after the Big
1255: Bang, or over the redshift interval $z \sim$ 30 -- 1. Therefore, in
1256: order to elucidate the formation and evolution of galaxies, it is
1257: essential to investigate subgalactic objects at high redshifts.
1258: Due to the cosmological redshift, the surface brightness of objects
1259: decreases with increasing redshift
1260: by a factor of $(1+z)^4$, the
1261: so-called Tolman surface brightness dimming (Tolman 1930).
1262: This makes it difficult to estimate the true diameters of any high-$z$
1263: objects and thus it is hard to discover subgalactic small objects
1264: solely by direct imaging observations.
1265: Hence, it is necessary to find objects with small velocity dispersions,
1266: providing firm dynamical evidence for subgalactic masses.
1267: In this section, we briefly present recent observations of such
1268: subgalactic populations.
1269:
1270: \subsection{Abell 2218 a at $z=5.58$}
1271:
1272: A group led by R. Ellis conducted a blind spectroscopic survey
1273: of the appropriate critical lines of several well-constrained lensing
1274: clusters, all of which were imaged by HST. During the course
1275: of their spectroscopic observations, they found a very promising
1276: subgalactic object at $z=5.576$ (see also Table 4).
1277: This object was found as a pair of emission-line objects, but
1278: their careful lensing model analysis showed that this pair arises
1279: through a gravitationally lensed source at very high magnification;
1280: the magnification factor is as high as $\simeq$ 30.
1281: Its $I$-band magnitude corrected for this amplification is estimated
1282: as $I \simeq 30$ and the physical size is as small as 150 pc.
1283: The star formation rate is estimated as $\sim 0.5 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
1284: It is also remarkable that its dynamical mass is only $\sim 10^6 M_\odot$,
1285: being comparable to those of globular clusters.
1286:
1287: \subsection{LAE J1044-0123 at $z=5.66$}
1288:
1289: The author's group has carried out a very deep optical imaging survey
1290: for faint Ly$\alpha$
1291: emitters in the field surrounding the quasar SDSSp
1292: J104433.04$-$012502.2 at redshift 5.74 [see section IV (c)].
1293: In addition to LAE J1044$-$0130 (Ajiki et al. 2002), they also found
1294: another single-line
1295: emitter which was identified as a LAE at $z=5.66$ based on their KeckII/ESI
1296: spectrum (Fig. 6). Its thumbnails are shown in Fig. 7.
1297: The most intriguing property of LAE J1044$-$0123 is that the observed
1298: emission-line width (full width at half maximum; FWHM) of redshifted
1299: Ly$\alpha$ is only 2.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \AA. Since the instrumental spectral
1300: resolution is 1.7 $\pm$ 0.1 \AA, the intrinsic width is only 1.4 $\pm$
1301: 0.5 \AA, corresponding to $FWHM_{\rm obs} \simeq$ 52 $\pm$ 19 km s$^{-1}$ or a
1302: velocity dispersion
1303: $\sigma_{\rm obs} = FWHM_{\rm obs}/(2 \sqrt{2 {\rm ln} 2}) \simeq$
1304: 22 km s$^{-1}$. This value is comparable to those of luminous globular
1305: clusters (Djorgovski 1995).
1306:
1307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1308: % Fig. 6 (Sp. of LAE1044-123)
1309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1310: \begin{figure}
1311: \epsfysize=8.0cm \epsfbox{fig6.ps}
1312: %\plotone{fig6.ps}
1313: %\vspace{10cm}
1314: \caption[]{
1315: The optical spectrum of LAE J1044-0123 obtained
1316: with the Keck II Echelle Spectrograph and Imager (ESI)
1317: taken from Taniguchi et al. (2003). We show the
1318: spectrogram in the upper panel and the one-dimensional spectrum
1319: extracted with an aperture of 1.2 arcsec.
1320: \label{fig6}
1321: }
1322: \end{figure}
1323:
1324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1325: % Fig. 7 (Thumbnail of LAE1044-123)
1326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1327: \begin{figure}
1328: \epsfysize=6.0cm \epsfbox{fig7.ps}
1329: %\plotone{fig7.ps}
1330: %\vspace{10cm}
1331: \caption[]{
1332: Thumb-nail images of LAE J1044$-$0123 (upper panel)
1333: taken from Taniguchi et al. (2003).
1334: The angular size of the circle in each panel corresponds to 8 arcsec.
1335: Their contours are shown in the middle panel. The lower panel shows
1336: the spectral energy distribution on a magnitude scale.
1337: \label{fig7}
1338: }
1339: \end{figure}
1340:
1341: If a source is surrounded by neutral hydrogen, Ly$\alpha$ photons emitted
1342: from the source are heavily scattered. Furthermore, the red damping wing of
1343: the Gunn-Peterson trough could also suppress the Ly$\alpha$ emission line
1344: (Gunn \& Peterson 1965; Miralda-Escud\'e
1345: 1998; Miralda-Escud\'e \& Rees 1998; Haiman 2002 and references therein).
1346: If this is the case for LAE J1044$-$0123, we may see only a part of
1347: the Ly$\alpha$ emission. Haiman (2002) estimated that only 8\% of the
1348: Ly$\alpha$ emission is detected in the case of HCM-6A at $z=6.56$
1349: found by Hu et al. (2002).
1350: However, the observed Ly$\alpha$ emission-line profile of LAE J1044$-$0123
1351: shows the sharp cutoff at wavelengths shortward of the line peak.
1352: This property suggests that the H {\sc i} absorption is dominated by
1353: H {\sc i} gas in the system rather than that in the IGM
1354: Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that the blue half of the
1355: Ly$\alpha$ emission could be absorbed in the case of LAE J1044$-$0123.
1356: Then we estimate a modest velocity dispersion,
1357: $\sigma_0 \sim 2 \sigma_{\rm obs} \sim$ 44 km s$^{-1}$.
1358: Given the diameter of this object probed by the
1359: Ly$\alpha$ emission, $D \simeq 7.7 h_{0.7}^{-1}$ kpc,
1360: we obtain the dynamical timescale of $\tau_{\rm dyn} \sim
1361: D/\sigma_0 \sim 1.7 \times 10^8$ yr. This would give an upper limit of
1362: the star formation timescale in the system; i.e., $\tau_{\rm SF}
1363: \lesssim \tau_{\rm dyn}$. However, if the observed diameter is
1364: determined by the so-called Str\"omgren sphere photoionized by
1365: a central star cluster, it is not necessary to adopt $\tau_{\rm SF}
1366: \sim \tau_{\rm dyn}$. It seems more appropriate to adopt a shorter
1367: timescale for such high-$z$ star-forming galaxies, e.g.,
1368: $\tau_{\rm SF} \sim 10^7$ yr, as adopted for HCM-6A at $z \approx 6.56$
1369: (Hu et al. 2002) by Haiman (2002).
1370: One may also derive a dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn} =
1371: (D/2) \sigma_0 ^2 G^{-1} \sim 2 \times 10^9 M_\odot$ (neglecting possible
1372: inclination effects).
1373:
1374: At the source redshift, $z=5.655$, the mass of a dark matter halo which
1375: could collapse is estimated as
1376:
1377: \begin{equation}
1378: M_{\rm vir} \sim 9 \times 10^6 \left({r_{\rm vir} \over {\rm 1 ~ kpc}}\right)^3
1379: h_{0.7}^{-1} ~ M_\odot
1380: \end{equation}
1381: where $r_{\rm vir}$ is the Virial radius [see equation (24) in Barkana
1382: \& Loeb (2001)]. If we adopt $r_{\rm vir} = D/2$ = 3.85 kpc,
1383: we would obtain $M_{\rm vir} \sim 5 \times 10^8 ~ M_\odot$.
1384: However, the radius of the dark matter halo could be ten times as large as
1385: $D/2$. If this is the case, we obtain $M_{\rm vir} \sim 5 \times 10^{10}
1386: ~ M_\odot$ and $\sigma_0 \sim 75$ km s$^{-1}$.
1387: Comparing this velocity dispersion with the observed one, we estimate
1388: that the majority of Ly$\alpha$ emission would be absorbed by neutral
1389: hydrogen.
1390:
1391: How massive is this source ?; i.e., $\sim 10^9 M_\odot$ or more
1392: massive than $10^{10} M_\odot$.
1393: If the star formation timescale is as long as the dynamical one,
1394: the stellar mass assembled in LAE J1044$-$0123 at $z=5.655$ exceeds
1395: $10^9 ~ M_\odot$, being comparable to the
1396: nominal dynamical mass, $M_{\rm dyn} \sim 2 \times 10^9 ~ M_\odot$.
1397: Since it is quite unlikely that most mass is assembled to form stars
1398: in the system, the dark matter halo around LAE J1044$-$0123 would be
1399: more massive by one order of magnitude at least than the above stellar
1400: mass. If this is the case, we could miss the majority of the Ly$\alpha$
1401: emission and the absorption could be attributed to the red damping
1402: wing of neutral hydrogen in the IGM.
1403: Since the redshift of LAE J1044$-$0123 ($z=5.655$) is close to that
1404: of SDSSp J104433.04$-$012502.2 ($z=5.74$), it is possible that
1405: these two objects are located at nearly the same cosmological distance.
1406: The angular separation between LAE J1044$-$0123 and SDSSp
1407: J104433.04$-$012502.2, 113 arcsec, corresponds to the linear
1408: separation of 4.45 $h_{0.7}^{-1}$ Mpc.
1409: The Str\"omgren radius of SDSSp J104433.04$-$012502.2 can be estimated
1410: to be $r_{\rm S} \sim 6.3 (t_{\rm Q}/2\times 10^7 ~ {\rm yr})^{1/3}$
1411: Mpc using equation (1)
1412: in Haiman \& Cen (2002) where $t_{\rm Q}$ is the lifetime of the quasar
1413: (see also Cen \& Haiman 2000).
1414: Even if this quasar is amplified by a factor of 2 by gravitational
1415: lensing (Shioya et al. 2002b), we obtain $r_{\rm S} \sim 4.9$ Mpc.
1416: Therefore, it seems likely that the IGM around LAE J1044$-$0123
1417: may be ionized completely. If this is the case, we cannot expect that
1418: the Ly$\alpha$ emission of LAE J1044$-$0123 is severely absorbed
1419: by the red damping wing emission.
1420: In order to examine which is the case, $L$-band spectroscopy is
1421: recommended because the redshifted [O {\sc iii}]$\lambda$5007 emission
1422: will be detected at 3.33 $\mu$m, which can be detected by
1423: the James Webb Space Telescope.
1424:
1425: \section{On-Going Deep Survey Programs}
1426:
1427: \subsection{The LALA Survey}
1428:
1429: The LALA (Large Area Lyman Alpha) Survey has been conducted
1430: by using the wide-field camera (a 36$^\prime \times 36^\prime$ field of view)
1431: on the Kitt Peak National Observatory's 4m Mayall telescope.
1432: Their broad-band images are shared in collaboration with
1433: the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey (Januzzi \& Dey 1999).
1434: Together with narrow-band filters, this camera has been
1435: used to search for high-$z$ Ly$\alpha$ emitters at $z \approx 4.5$
1436: (Rhoads et al. 2000; Malhotra \& Rhoads 2002) and at $z \approx 5.7$
1437: (Rhoads \& Malhotra 2001; Rhoads et al. 2003); see also section II (b).
1438:
1439: Their first search for LAEs at $z \approx 4.5$ gives a surface density of
1440: LAEs at $z \approx 4.5$, $1.1 \times 10^4 \pm 700$ deg$^{-2}$
1441: (Rhoads et al 2000).
1442: Their follow-up optical spectroscopy led to the identification of an
1443: LAE at $z = 4.52$. However, they also identified two low-$z$ interlopers,
1444: suggesting that the success rate of LAE identification is $\sim 1/3$.
1445: A similar success rate is also reported by Kodaira et al. (2003)
1446: for their LAE search at $z \approx 6.6$.
1447: They noted that their LAE candidates at $z \approx 4.5$ tend to have
1448: larger emission-line equivalent width with respect to the model
1449: prediction (Malhotra \& Rhoads 2002).
1450: They interpreted this as evidence for massive-star
1451: enhanced star formation in young galaxies. Detailed follow-up spectroscopy
1452: will be necessary to confirm it.
1453:
1454: Rhoads \& Malhotra (2001) also made a search for LAEs at $z \approx 5.7$
1455: using the two narrowband filters centered at 8150 \AA ~ (NB815)
1456: and 8230 \AA (NB823),
1457: each of which has FWHM of 75 \AA. They found seven LAE candidates
1458: using the NB815 filter and six using the NB823 one.
1459: Rhoads et al. (2003) made optical follow-up spectroscopy of four LAE
1460: candidates and the found three out of four appear to be LAEs at $z \simeq$ 5.67,
1461: 5.70, and 5.75; the remaining one object is too faint to be detected
1462: in their spectroscopy.
1463:
1464: \subsection{CADIS}
1465:
1466: Another interesting deep survey program is
1467: Calar Alto Deep Imaging Survey (CADIS).
1468: This project uses the 2.2 m and 3.5 m telescopes at
1469: Calar Alto Observatory in Spain and observe 10 sky fields,
1470: each of which has a 120 arcmin$^2$ area (see for a review,
1471: Thommes 1999; see also York et al. 2001, 2003; Hippelein et al. 2003).
1472: Although Thommes et al. (1998) found seven candidates for LAE
1473: at $z \sim 5.7$, their follow-up spectroscopy did not confirm
1474: their identification (see Stern \& Spinrad 1999).
1475:
1476: Recently, Maier et al. (2003) reported their new results
1477: on surveys for LAEs with use of their three narrow
1478: filter bands centered at 7000 \AA, 8200 \AA, and 9200 \AA;
1479: note that they used an imaging Fabry-Perot interferometer.
1480: They found 5 bright LAE candidates at $z \sim 4.8$ and
1481: 11 ones at $z \sim 5.7$.
1482:
1483: One important characteristic of the CADIS survey is that
1484: 13 intermediate-band (or medium-band) filters are used
1485: in this survey in addition to the usual four broad-band filters
1486: ($B$, $R$, $K$, and $K^\prime$). This filter set provides
1487: better classifications of stars, galaxies, and quasars
1488: at various redshifts (e.g., Wolf et al. 2001, 2003).
1489: The use of such an intermediate-band filter system
1490: is also planned for the Suprime-Cam on the Subaru Telescope
1491: (Taniguchi 2001).
1492:
1493: \subsection{The Subaru Deep Field}
1494:
1495: The Subaru telescope team
1496: has officially started a large-scale deep survey program in April 2002;
1497: the Subaru Deep Field (SDF) project.
1498: Several pilot papers related to the SDF project have been already published
1499: (Maihara et al. 2000; Ouchi et al. 2003; Kashikawa et al. 2003;
1500: see also Totani et al. 2001a, 2001b, 2001c).
1501: This project already identified two LAEs at $z \approx 6.6$
1502: (Kodaira et al. 2003); see also section VII (b).
1503: The overall design of the SDF project will be given elsewhere.
1504:
1505: \section{THE EARLY COSMIC STAR FORMATION HISTORY}
1506:
1507: \subsection{Introduction}
1508:
1509: As already noted before, the Lyman break method allowed us to
1510: find a large number of high-$z$ galaxies. Although a small part
1511: of LBGs have been confirmed by spectroscopy, photometric redshifts
1512: are reasonably available for most LBGs. Therefore, the LBG data
1513: are highly useful to probe cosmic star formation history in the early
1514: universe (e.g., Madau et al. 1996; Steidel et al. 1999).
1515: In particular, Madau et al. (1996) investigated the cosmic star
1516: formation history quantitatively; i.e., the star formation rate
1517: density (SFRD) was investigated as a function of redshift (the so-called
1518: Madau plot). Strictly speaking, we have to take account of the SFRD
1519: contributed by hidden populations such as dusty starburst galaxies
1520: (e.g., Hughes et al. 1998; Barger et al. 1998, 1999).
1521: Yet, it is shown that the SFRD appears to be constant between
1522: $z \approx 1$ and $z \approx 4$ (e.g., Madau et al. 1998; Steidel
1523: et al. 1999). This constancy appears to extend up to $z \approx 5$
1524: although the SFRD tends to show a slow decline with $z$
1525: (Iwata et al. 2003).
1526:
1527: \subsection{Viewed from LAEs}
1528:
1529: Here a question arises as; How is the SFRD beyond $z=5$ ?
1530: Since it is quite difficult to find LBGs beyond $z=5$ because
1531: they are basically $I$ dropouts and thus we cannot
1532: estimate their photometric redshifts
1533: solely using $z$ band data. Therefore, LAE survey data are
1534: highly useful in investigations of the SFRD beyond $z=5$.
1535:
1536: Recently, Kodaira et al. (2003) have found 73 LAE candidates in the
1537: Subaru Deep Field (SDF) based on their very deep imaging with the NB921
1538: filter together with $i^\prime$ and $z^\prime$ data.
1539: They then carried out follow-up optical spectroscopy of nine sources
1540: and discovered two LAEs at $z \approx$6.6.
1541: Since the SDF is a blank field and the lensing effect is expected to
1542: be small in this field,
1543: they can perform a simple statistical analysis
1544: of star formation activity in the investigated volume.
1545: They obtained the average SFR for the two LAEs;
1546: 7.1 $\pm$ 2.0
1547: $h_{0.7}^{-2} ~ M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, being comparable to those of LAEs at
1548: $z \simeq$ 5.1 -- 5.8 (e.g., Ajiki et al. 2002).
1549: It should be mentioned that the SFR estimated above is a lower limit
1550: because it is quite likely that a blue half or more of the Ly$\alpha$ emission
1551: may be absorbed by H {\sc i} gas and dust grains in the galaxy itself and by
1552: the intergalactic H {\sc i} gas (Miralda-Escud\'e 1998; Miralda-Escud\'e \&
1553: Rees 1998; Cen \& McDonald 2002).
1554: It is also noted that the SFR based on the Ly$\alpha$ luminosity
1555: tends to be underestimated
1556: by a few times or more than that based on the UV luminosity (see also
1557: Hu et al. 2002).
1558:
1559: Assuming that approximately 22\% (=2/9) of
1560: 73 LAE candidates are real LAEs at $z \approx$ 6.5 - 6.6,
1561: they obtained a star formation rate density of $\rho_{\rm SFR} \simeq 5.2 \times 10^{-4}
1562: h_{0.7} ~ M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ given
1563: the survey volume, 202,000 $h_{0.7}^{-3}$ Mpc$^{3}$.
1564: Their estimate can be regarded as a robust and first meaningful
1565: lower limit for the star formation rate density beyond $z=6$.
1566: They also compare this value with previous estimates in a so-called
1567: Madau plot (Fig. 8);
1568: note that all the previous estimates are converted to those in the cosmology
1569: adopted in this review.
1570: As shown in Fig. 8, moderate
1571: star formation activity already occurred in the early universe beyond $z=6$.
1572:
1573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1574: % Fig. 8 (Madau plot)
1575: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1576: \begin{figure}
1577: \epsfysize=7.5cm \epsfbox{fig8.eps}
1578: %\plotone{fig8.eps}
1579: %\vspace{10cm}
1580: \caption[]{
1581: The star formation rate density ($\rho_{\rm SFR}$) as a function of redshift $z$
1582: taken from Kodaira et al. (2003).
1583: Their new estimate at $z \approx 6.6$ (large filled diamond)
1584: is shown together with the results of previous Ly$\alpha$ searches at $z \sim 3$ - 5
1585: (CH98 = Cowie \& Hu 1998, K00 = Kudritzki et al. 2000, F03 = Fujita et al.
1586: 2003, and O03 = Ouchi et al. 2003).
1587: The previous investigations are shown by
1588: filled triangle (Gallego et al. 1996), open triangle (Treyer et al. 1998),
1589: open circle (Tresse \& Maddox 1998), stars (Lilly et al. 1996),
1590: open pentagons (Hammer et al. 1999),
1591: filled squares (Connolly et al. 1997), filled circles (Madau 1998),
1592: and open squares (Pettini et al. 1999).
1593: Other results for Lyman break galaxies between $z$ = 3 - 4
1594: are also shown by filled pentagons (Steidel et al. 1999).
1595: \label{fig8}
1596: }
1597: \end{figure}
1598:
1599:
1600: Finally, it is also reminded that we do not integrate the SFRDs
1601: of LAE candidates shown in Figure 8, assuming a certain luminosity function from
1602: a lower to a upper limit because there is no
1603: reliable luminosity function for high-$z$ LAEs.
1604: Recently, Ajiki et al. (2003) estimated the Ly$\alpha$ luminosity function
1605: for the LAE samples obtained by both Cowie \& Hu (1998) and their own survey.
1606: The results are shown in Figure 9. If we integrate the SFRDs for both surveys,
1607: we obtain the corrected SFRD shown in Figure 10. The corrected values are quite
1608: similar to those estimated from Lyman break galaxies at $3 < z < 4$
1609: (see also Bouwens et al. 2003).
1610: Future careful investigations
1611: will be absolutely necessary to estimate a more reliable contribution
1612: of LAEs to the cosmic SFRD at high redshift.
1613:
1614: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1615: % Fig. 9 (LF)
1616: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1617: \begin{figure}
1618: \epsfysize=7.5cm \epsfbox{fig9.ps}
1619: %\plotone{fig9.eps}
1620: %\vspace{10cm}
1621: \caption[]{
1622: Ly$\alpha$ luminosity function for the two LAE samples obtained by
1623: Ajiki et al. (2003) and Cowie \& Hu (1998). The solid curve is
1624: fro Ajiki et al. (2003) and the dotted one for Cowie \& Hu (1998).
1625: \label{fig9}
1626: }
1627: \end{figure}
1628:
1629: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1630: % Fig. 10 (New Madau plot)
1631: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1632: \begin{figure}
1633: \epsfysize=7.5cm \epsfbox{fig10.ps}
1634: %\plotone{fig10.eps}
1635: %\vspace{10cm}
1636: \caption[]{
1637: New star formation rate density corrected for the Ly$\alpha$ luminosity
1638: function shown in Figure 9. The filled diamond shows the data point for
1639: Ajiki et al. (2003) and the open inverse triangle is for Cowie \& Hu (1998).
1640: \label{fig10}
1641: }
1642: \end{figure}
1643:
1644: \section{COMMENTS ON THE REIONIZATION EPOCH OF INTERGALACTIC MEDIUM}
1645:
1646: \subsection{Introduction}
1647:
1648: It is believed that our universe began approximately 13 billion years
1649: ago according to the standard big bang cosmology with the adopted
1650: cosmological parameters.
1651: Primeval material (hydrogen, helium, and light elements)
1652: was completely ionized for the first 300,000 years
1653: (its corresponding redshift interval is $1000 \lesssim z < \infty$)
1654: and then recombined.
1655: Tiny density fluctuations at this stage were thought to evolve
1656: to various cosmological objects like galaxies which are observed
1657: now in the universe (e.g., Peebles 1993; Fukugita, Hogan, \& Peebles 1996;
1658: Bahcall et al. 1999).
1659: The most distant physical information that we can detect is the so-called
1660: cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) with temperature of 2.7 K.
1661: This is indeed the redshifted thermal emission from the very young
1662: universe at $z \sim 1000$. Even though we can detect this information,
1663: individual cosmological objects that we can see are distant quasars
1664: and galaxies at $z \sim 6$ (Hu et al.2002 and see Table 4 in this review;
1665: Fan et al. 2003 and references therein).
1666: Were there any light sources between $z \sim $ 1000 and $z \sim$ 6 ?
1667: Although we human beings have not yet detected any information from
1668: the universe between $z \sim $ 1000 and $z \sim$ 6, what we can say now is that
1669: the universe between $z \sim $ 1000 and $z \sim$ 6 appears dark.
1670: This era is called the dark age of the universe (Rees 1996, 1999).
1671:
1672: \subsection{The Ionization State of Intergalactic Matter}
1673:
1674: It is evident from the presence of CMBR that the universe once recombined at
1675: $z \sim 1000$. However, it is also known that the intergalactic space
1676: is completely ionized in the universe between $z \sim 6$ and $z \sim 0$.
1677: Its observational evidence is obtained from the so-called Gunn-Peterson
1678: test (Gunn \& Peterson 1965). Since the Gunn-Peterson optical depth at
1679: $z \sim 4$ is much smaller than 1 (Sasaki \& Umemura 1996),
1680: it is strongly suggested that the intergalactic space at this redshift
1681: is really completely ionized (Songaila et al. 1999; see also Songaila \&
1682: Cowie 2002).
1683:
1684: Another interesting absorption feature found in rest-frame UV spectra of
1685: high-$z$ quasars are Ly$\alpha$ forests. It has been often considered
1686: that these forests are attributed to discrete cloudlets of neutral hydrogen.
1687: However, recent cosmological fluid simulations have suggested that they
1688: are attributed to density fluctuations in the universe
1689: (Cen et al. 1994; Miralda-Escude et al. 1996; Gnedin \& Ostriker 1997;
1690: Zhang et al. 1997). This means that Ly$\alpha$ forests arise from regions
1691: where the fraction of neutral hydrogen is relatively high.
1692: If this is the case, it is not necessarily to distinguish between
1693: Ly$\alpha$ forests and the Gunn-Peterson optical depth. From this reason,
1694: it is now popular to adopt the continuum depression $D_A$ defined
1695: as the integrated continuum absorption between the wavelengths of
1696: Ly$\alpha$ and Ly$\beta$, as a measure of the intergalactic absorption
1697: (Oke \& Korycansky 1982). For example, the most distant quasar known at
1698: $z=6.28$ shows $D_A > 90$\% (Fan et al. 2001).
1699: It is shown that $D_A$ begins to increases rapidly with redshift beyond
1700: $z=3$ and exceeds 0.9 at $z \simeq 5$. Although it was expected that $D_A$
1701: reaches approximately 1 at $z > 5$, recent observations of high-$z$ quasars
1702: at $z>5$ have shown that $D_A$ appears constant; i.e., $D_A=0.9$.
1703: This led Djorgovski et al. (2001) to suggest that we see the trailing
1704: edge of the reionization at $z \approx 6$, implying that the reionization
1705: occurred at $z > 6$ (Songaila \& Cowie 2002).
1706:
1707: \subsection{The Cosmic Reionization}
1708:
1709: Recently, Nakamoto, Umemura, \& Susa (2001) made numerical simulations of
1710: the cosmic reionization process by solving the 3-D radiative
1711: transfer equations. This simulation shows that neutral regions begin to
1712: develop at $z \simeq 15$ due to effects of both the self-shielding
1713: and shadowing and then even such regions are subject to ionization
1714: by UV radiation at $z \simeq 9$.
1715: Although the universe appears completely ionized at $z \simeq 7$,
1716: the intergalactic medium is still opaque for ionizing photons.
1717: It is found that the intergalactic medium finally becomes optically
1718: thin for ionizing photons at $z \simeq 5$. The most intriguing result of
1719: this simulation is that the opacity for ionizing photons keeps a high value
1720: even after the completion of reionization of the universe. It is also suggested
1721: that Ly$\alpha$ line emission is subject to strong absorption because
1722: the total absorption cross section for Ly$\alpha$ is similar to
1723: that for photoionization. Accordingly,
1724: the condition of $D_A \approx 1$ does not necessarily mean that
1725: the intergalactic space is neutral.
1726:
1727: As mentioned before, there are two alternative reionization sources;
1728: massive stars in galaxies and AGNs like quasars (e.g., Fukugita \& Kawasaki 1994).
1729: The number density of quasars has a significant peak at $z \sim 2$
1730: and then decreases with increasing redshift. Therefore, recently,
1731: it has been often considered that massive stars in galaxies
1732: are more feasible reionization sources. However, it is still
1733: unknown when and how such galaxies formed in the early universe.
1734: So-called cold dark matter (CDM) models suggest that the first stars
1735: [i.e., Population III (Pop. III) objects] could form at $z \sim 30$.
1736: Recent theoretical considerations suggest that such stars could be
1737: very massive (Abel et al. 1998; Bromm, Coppi, \& Larson 1999; Nakamura \&
1738: Umemura 1999, 2001) although there is an alternative idea that
1739: intermediate-mass stars could be preferentially formed in zero-metal
1740: pregalactic gas clouds (Yoshii \& Saio 1986; see also Shioya et al. 2002a).
1741:
1742: If Pop. III stars are so massive, we have
1743: two alternative ionization sources. One is very hot stars with
1744: temperature of $>10^5$ K and the other is mini AGNs which have hard continuum
1745: emission. Hot Pop. III stars may have a softer continuum than mini AGNs.
1746: Since the photoionization cross section is proportional approximately to
1747: $\nu^{-3}$,
1748: harder-energy photons can more easily penetrate into gaseous media, giving rise
1749: to more smoothed ionization structures in the intergalactic space. On the
1750: other hand, the self-shielding effect for softer-energy photons causes
1751: highly-contrasted ionization structures. In either case, these sources could
1752: reionize the universe up to $z \simeq 10$ (Loeb \& Barkana 2001).
1753: This means that the universe was reionized by objects formed in
1754: the dark age and then the reionization process ended in the dark age.
1755:
1756: It is considered that Pop. III stars formed in subgalactic clumps at
1757: $z \sim$ 10 -- 30 (Gnedin \& Ostriker 1997).
1758: If these stars could contribute to the reionization, the star formation
1759: density may be $\sim 0.2 M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$,
1760: being comparable to that at $z \simeq $ 1 -- 4 (Barkana \& Loeb 2000;
1761: Blain et al. 1999). Although massive stars in these subgalactic clumps at
1762: $z \sim$ 10 -- 30 could be feasible reionization sources,
1763: they are too faint to be detected by using any 8m-class telescopes; if we
1764: try to detect $\sim 0.1 L^*$ galaxies using 8-10m class telescopes
1765: (i.e., $J$ dropouts), we need more than 100 hours integration for both
1766: $J$ and $H$ bands (F. Iwamuro, private communication).
1767:
1768: It is considered that galaxies with an ordinary mass could form at
1769: $z \sim 10$. Indeed, very high-$z$ galaxies were already found at
1770: $z=6.56$ (Hu et al. 2002) and at $z=6.58$ (Kodaira et al. 2003).
1771: Although new high-$z$ quasars will be found in the existing and future surveys,
1772: finding high-$z$ galaxies seems more important because the
1773: number density of galaxies would be much higher than that of quasars.
1774: In order to understand the reionization process, new systematic searches
1775: for Ly$\alpha$ emitting galaxies are very important although
1776: the WMAP data suggest that the cosmic reionization epoch may be
1777: $z_{\rm rec} \approx 17 \pm 4$ (Spergel et al. 2003).
1778:
1779: \subsection{Further Comments}
1780:
1781: Recent discovery of quasars at $z \sim 6$ by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
1782: (SDSS) made it possible to examine a so-called Gunn-Peterson trough in the
1783: UV spectra of such SDSS high-$z$ quasars (e.g., Fan et al. 2001, 2003;
1784: Becker et al. 2001). Since such new information can be used to estimate
1785: the epoch of the cosmic reionization, deep and wide-field searches for LAEs
1786: beyond $z=6$ gains high importance (see for a review, Loeb \& Barkana 2001).
1787: It seems important that
1788: there is no continuum emission shortward of the Ly$\alpha$ line
1789: of HCM 6A at $z=6.56$ (Hu et al. 2002). The two LAEs at $z=6.6$
1790: found in Kodaira et al. (2003) also share the same property.
1791: It is known that the radiation damping wing from the neutral H {\sc i}
1792: gas can absorb radiation 20 \AA ~ redward of the Ly$\alpha$
1793: wavelength in the observed frame of the object (Miralda-Escud\'e 1998;
1794: Miralda-Escud\'e \& Rees 1998). Therefore, the presence
1795: of LAEs beyond $z=6$ suggests that the reionization epoch may be earlier
1796: than $z=6$ (e.g., Hu et al. 2002).
1797: However, if a LAE is surrounded by
1798: a cosmological H {\sc ii} region that is made by the LAE itself,
1799: the Ly$\alpha$ emission line can remain observable even if most
1800: intergalactic medium is neutral (Haiman 2002).
1801: In order to pursue this issue, we need a larger sample of LAEs
1802: between $z =6$ and $z=7$ scattered in a large sky area.
1803:
1804: \section{NEAR FUTURE PROSPECTS}
1805:
1806: \subsection{Introduction}
1807:
1808: As demonstrated in this review, more than twenty
1809: LAEs beyond $z=5$ have been already discovered. It is also
1810: expected that a large number of such LAEs will be found
1811: soon because there are a number of on-going deep survey programs
1812: aiming at finding them. In fact, our group has found more than
1813: 20 LAE candidates at $z \approx 5.7$ (Ajiki et al. 2002).
1814: The SDF team has also found $\sim$ 70 LAE candidates at
1815: $z \approx 6.6$. Therefore, we will be able to investigate
1816: the cosmic star formation history probed by a large number of
1817: high-$z$ LAEs soon (perhaps, within a couple of years).
1818:
1819: \subsection{Optical Follow-up Spectroscopy}
1820:
1821: The progress in LAE searches beyond $z=5$ may depend on
1822: the efficiency of follow-up optical spectroscopy.
1823: Although multi-object spectroscopy mode has been already
1824: ready in most spectrographs on the 8-10m telescopes,
1825: high-spectral resolution (e.g., $R >$ 2000 - 3000) is
1826: absolutely necessary
1827: to confirm the blue-sharp-cutoff profile which is the most
1828: important property of the Ly$\alpha$ emission line.
1829: The reason for this is that only Ly$\alpha$ can be found
1830: in optical spectra of LAEs beyond $z=5$. Indeed, it has been
1831: often discussed that a single emission line in optical spectra
1832: of faint galaxies can be either Ly$\alpha$ or [O {\sc ii}]$\lambda$3727
1833: (e.g., Stern et al. 2000a and references therein).
1834:
1835: Such a single line with large equivalent width (e.g., $>$ 200 \AA)
1836: has been considered to be a probable LAE. However, intense star-forming
1837: galaxies at intermediate redshift also sometimes have such large
1838: equivalent widths of [O {\sc ii}] emission (e.g., Ohyama et al. 1999;
1839: Stern et al. 2000a).
1840: Therefore, single-line objects with a large equivalent width are not
1841: always LAEs at high redshift. The continuum break at wavelengths
1842: shortward of Ly$\alpha$ also provides firm evidence for a LAE
1843: (e.g., Hu et al. 2002). However, the star formation timescale in
1844: LAEs beyond $z=5$ may not be so long (e.g., less than 1 Gyr).
1845: Therefore, LAEs are not always detectable in the continuum
1846: when their wavelength is
1847: longer than Ly$\alpha$ that can be probed at $z$ photometric band.
1848: Accordingly, the line shape is the best discriminator of LAEs
1849: from low-$z$ interlopers.
1850: Indeed, if the spectral resolution is high enough to resolve the [O {\sc ii}]
1851: doublet line (see Fig. 11), it is easily to reject low-$z$ interlopers
1852: from high-$z$ LAE candidates.
1853:
1854: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1855: % Fig. 11 ([OII])
1856: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1857: \begin{figure}
1858: \epsfysize=7cm \epsfbox{fig11.ps}
1859: %\plotone{fig11.ps}
1860: %\vspace{10cm}
1861: \caption[]{
1862: An optical spectrum of the foreground neighbor galaxy ($z=0.802$) of
1863: LAE J1044$-$0130 (Ajiki et al. 2002) obtained with ESI on Keck II
1864: (see Figure 2).
1865: The [O {\sc ii}]$\lambda$3727 doublet is clearly seen.
1866: \label{fig11}
1867: }
1868: \end{figure}
1869:
1870: \subsection{New Surveys with Intermediate-Band Filters}
1871:
1872: New-type filters, intermediate-band filters, have been recently
1873: introduced in optical deep surveys such as CADIS
1874: [see section VI (b)]. The MAHOROBA project planned to be made
1875: with use of the Suprime-Cam on the Subaru Telescope also uses
1876: such an intermediate-band filter system. This filter system
1877: has a spectroscopic resolution of $R = 23$ covering wavelengths
1878: between 3800 \AA ~ and 9900 \AA ~ (Taniguchi 2001); see Fig. 12.
1879:
1880:
1881: \begin{figure*}
1882: \epsfysize=5.5cm \epsfbox{fig12.ps}
1883: %\epsscale{1.5}
1884: %\plotone{fig12.ps}
1885: \caption[]{
1886: Transmission curves for the Subaru intermediate-band filters.
1887: Note that the transmission curves of the first two filters are
1888: not drawn in this Figure.
1889: \label{fig12}
1890: }
1891: \end{figure*}
1892:
1893: A pilot survey for LAEs at $z \approx 3.7$ is reported by
1894: Fujita et al. (2003), in which one of the intermediate-band filters,
1895: IA574 (centered at 5740 \AA ~ with FWHM of 280 \AA), is used.
1896: Although their survey depth is not so deep, they have found
1897: six LAE candidates among 23 strong emission-line sources.
1898: Although the use of such an intermediate-band filter is not
1899: useful in searching for very faint LAEs,
1900: a large number of strong LAEs should detected,
1901: because each filter can probe a volume of
1902: $\sim 10^6$ Mpc$^3$ thanks to the wide-filed coverage of
1903: the Suprime-Cam.
1904:
1905: \subsection{NIR Surveys}
1906:
1907: If we use optical imagers, we cannot find objects
1908: beyond $z=7$ because the Ly$\alpha$ line passes out of the optical
1909: window for such a very high redshift. Therefore, it will become
1910: much more important to promote near-infrared (NIR) deep surveys
1911: (e.g., Pahre \& Djorgovski 1995; see also for papers on broad-band
1912: NIR surveys, Dickinson et al. 2000; Yahata et al. 2000).
1913: One technical problem is that any existing NIR cameras
1914: do not have a wide-field coverage. The next-generation NIR camera,
1915: MOIRCS, installed on the Subaru telescope may be the widest NIR
1916: camera with a field coverage is $4^\prime \times 7^\prime$;
1917: note that this may be the widest but its field coverage is
1918: almost comparable to typical optical imagers on the 8-10m class
1919: telescope like LRIS on Keck I. We need a much wider NIR camera
1920: in the future.
1921:
1922: \vspace{0.5cm}
1923:
1924: We would like to thank the organizers of this exciting and fruitful
1925: workshop at Pohang, Korea, in particular, Hyung Mok Lee,
1926: and all participants, in particular,
1927: Renyue Cen, Paul Shapiro, Dave Sanders, Peter Quinn, and Nick Scoville.
1928: We would also like to thank Alan Stockton, Esther Hu, Masayuki Umemura,
1929: Zoltan Haiman, Fumihide Iwamuro, Youichi Ohyama, Christian Maier,
1930: and Satoru Ikeuchi for their kind communications.
1931: We also thank all members of the SDF project, in particular, K. Kodaira,
1932: H. Karoji, H. Ando, M. Iye, N. Kashikawa, S. Okamura, K. Shimasaku,
1933: \& M. Ouchi.
1934: This work was financially supported in part by
1935: the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
1936: (Nos. 10044052, and 10304013).
1937:
1938: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1939: \begin{references}
1940: \reference{1}{Abel, T., Norman, M. L., \& Madau, P. 1999, ApJ, 523, 66}
1941: \reference{1}{Ajiki, M., et al. 2002, ApJ, 576, L25}
1942: \reference{1}{Ajiki, M., et al. 2003, AJ, submitted}
1943: \reference{1}{Arimoto, N., \& Yoshii, Y. 1987, A\&A, 173, 23}
1944: \reference{1}{Bahcall, J. N., Greenstein, J. L., \& Sargent, W. L. W.
1945: 1968, ApJ, 153, 689}
1946: \reference{1}{Baker, J. C., Hunstead, R. W., Bremer, M. N., Bland-Hawthorn, J.,
1947: Athreya, R. M., \& Barr, J. 2001, AJ, 121, 1821}
1948: \reference{1}{Barger, A., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 248}
1949: \reference{1}{Barger, A. J., Cowie, L. L., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J.,
1950: Blain, A. W., \& Kneib, J.-P. 1999, AJ, 117, 2656}
1951: \reference{1}{Barkana, R., \& Loeb, A. 2001, Physics Reports, 349, 125}
1952: \reference{1}{Becker, R. H., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2850}
1953: \reference{1}{Blain, A. W., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 715}
1954: \reference{1}{Bland-Hawthorn, J., van Bruegel, W., Gillingham, P. R., Baldry,
1955: I. K., \& Jones, D. H. 2001, ApJ, 563, 611}
1956: \reference{1}{Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Jones, H. 1997, (astro-ph/9707315)}
1957: \reference{1}{Bond, N. A., Churchill, C. W., Charlton, J. C., \& Vogt, S. S.
1958: 2001, ApJ, 562, 641}
1959: \reference{1}{Bouwens, R. J., et al. 2003 (astro-ph/0306215)}
1960: \reference{1}{Brocklehurst, M. 1971, MNRAS, 153, 471}
1961: \reference{1}{Bromm, V., Coppi, P. S., \& Larson, R. B. 1999, ApJ, 527, L5}
1962: \reference{1}{Brunner, R. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Prince, T. A., \& Szalay,
1963: A. S. 2001, Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift, ASP Conf. Ser.
1964: Vol. 254. Edited by John S. Mulchaey and John Stocke, 383}
1965: \reference{1}{Burbidge, E. M., Lynds, C. R., \& Stockton, A. N. 1968, ApJ,
1966: 152, 1077}
1967: \reference{1}{Cen, R., \& Haiman, Z. 2000, ApJ, 542, L75}
1968: \reference{1}{Cen, R., \& McDonald, P. 2002, ApJ, 570, 457}
1969: \reference{1}{Cen, R., Miralda-Escud\'e, J., Ostriker, J. P., \& Rauch, M.
1970: 1994, ApJ, 437, L9}
1971: \reference{1}{Chapman, S. C., Lewis, G. F., Scott, D., Richards, E.,
1972: Borys, C., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., \& Shapley, A. E.
1973: 2001, ApJ, 548, L17}
1974: \reference{1}{Chen, H.-W., Lanzetta, K. M., \& Pascarelle, S. 1999, Nature, 398, 586}
1975: \reference{1}{Chen, H.-W., Lanzetta, K. M., Pascarelle, S., \& Yahata, N.
1976: 2000, Nature, 408, 562}
1977: \reference{1}{Chernomordik, V. V., \& Ozernoy, L. M. 1983, Nature, 303, 153}
1978: \reference{1}{Cohen, J. G., Hogg, D. W., Blandford, R., Cowie, L. L., Hu, E.,
1979: Songaila, A., Shopbell, P., \& Richberg, K. 2000, ApJ, 545, 32}
1980: \reference{1}{Connolly, A. J., Szalay, A. S., Dickinson, M., Subbarao, M. U.,
1981: \& Brunner, R. J. 1997, ApJ, 486, L11}
1982: \reference{1}{Cowie, L. L., \& Hu, E. M. 1998, AJ, 115, 1319}
1983: \reference{1}{Cowie, L. L., Hu, E. M., \& Songaila, A. 1995, AJ, 110, 1576}
1984: \reference{1}{Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., \& Cohen, J. G.
1985: 1996, AJ, 112, 839}
1986: \reference{1}{Cuby, J. -G., Le F\`evre, O., McCracken, H., Cuillandre, J. -C.,
1987: \& Meneux, B. 2003, astro-ph/0303646}
1988: \reference{1}{Dawson, S., Spinrad, H., Stern, D., Dey, A., van
1989: Breugel, W., De Vries, W., \& Reuland, M. 2002,
1990: ApJ, 570, 92}
1991: \reference{1}{Dawson, S., Stern, D., Bunker, A. J., Spinrad, H., \&
1992: Dey, A. 2001, AJ, 122, 598}
1993: \reference{1}{Dey, A., Spinrad, H., Stern, D., Graham, J. R., \&
1994: Chaffee, F. H. 1998, ApJ, 498, L93}
1995: \reference{1}{Dickinson, M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 531, 624}
1996: \reference{1}{Djorgovski, S. G., Castro, S., Stern, D., \& Mahabal,
1997: A. A. 2001, ApJ, 560, L5}
1998: \reference{1}{Djorgovski, S. G., Pahre, M. A., Bechtold, J., Elston, R. 1996,
1999: Nature, 382, 234}
2000: \reference{1}{Djorgovski, S. G., Spinrad, H., McCarthy, P., \& Straus, M. A.
2001: 1985, ApJ, 299, L1}
2002: \reference{1}{Djorgovski, S. G., Straus, M. A., Perley, R. A., Spinrad, H.,
2003: \& McCarthy, P. 1987, AJ, 93, 1318}
2004: \reference{1}{Ellis, R., Santos, M. R., Kneib, J. -P., \& Kuijken,
2005: K. 2001, ApJ, 560, L119}
2006: \reference{1}{Fabian, A. C., Arnaud, K. A., Nulsen, P. E. J., \&
2007: Mushotzky, R. F. 1986, ApJ, 305, 9}
2008: \reference{1}{Fan, X., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1167}
2009: \reference{1}{Fan, X., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2833}
2010: \reference{1}{Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Strauss, M. A., White, R. L., Becker, R. H.,
2011: Pentericci, L., \& Rix H-. W. 2002, AJ, 123, 2151}
2012: \reference{1}{Fan, X., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649}
2013: \reference{1}{Fardal, M. A., Katz, N., Gardner, J. P., Hernquist, L., Weinberg, D. H.,
2014: \& Dav\'e, R. 2001, ApJ, 562, 605}
2015: \reference{1}{Francis, P. J., Woodgate, B. E., \& Danks, A. C. 1997, ApJ, 482, L25}
2016: \reference{1}{Francis, P. J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 457, 490}
2017: \reference{1}{Franx, M., Illingworth, G. D., Kelson, D. D., van Dokkum, P. G.,
2018: \& Tran, K. V. 1997, ApJ, 486, L75}
2019: \reference{1}{Frye, B,, Broadhurst, T., \& Ben\'itez, N. 2002, ApJ, 568, 558}
2020: \reference{1}{Fujita, S. S., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 13}
2021: \reference{1}{Fukugita, M., Hogan, C. J., \& Peebles, P. J. E. 1996, Nature, 381, 489}
2022: \reference{1}{Fukugita, M., \& Kawasaki, M. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 563}
2023: \reference{1}{Gallego, J., Zamorano, J., Arag\'on-Salamanca, A., \& Rego, M. 1996,
2024: ApJ, 455, L1; Erratum ApJ, 459, L43}
2025: \reference{1}{Giavalisco, M., Macchetto, F. D., \& Sparks, W. B. 1994,
2026: A\&A, 288, 103}
2027: \reference{1}{Gnedin, N. Y., \& Ostriker, J. P. 1997, ApJ, 486, 581}
2028: \reference{1}{Goodrich, R. W., et al. 2001, ApJ, 561, L23}
2029: \reference{1}{Gunn, J. E., \& Peterson, B. A. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1633}
2030: \reference{1}{Haiman, Z. 2002, ApJ, 576, L1}
2031: \reference{1}{Haiman, Z., \& Cen, R. 2002, ApJ, 578, 702}
2032: \reference{1}{Haiman, Z., Spaans, M., \& Quataert, E. 2000, ApJ, 537, L5}
2033: \reference{1}{Hammer, F., \& Flores, H. 1999, Thuan, T. X., et al. eds.
2034: Proc. XVIII Moriond meeting, Dwarf Galaxies and Cosmology.
2035: Editions Frontieres, Gif-sur-Yvette (astro-ph/9806184)}
2036: \reference{1}{Hayashino, T., et al. 2000, SPIE, 4008, 397}
2037: \reference{1}{Heckman, T. M. 1999, After the Dark Ages: When Galaxies were Young
2038: (the Universe at $2 < z < 5$),
2039: edited by S. Holt and E. Smith (American Institute of Physics
2040: Press), 322}
2041: \reference{1}{Hippelein, H., et al. 2003, A\&A, 402, 65}
2042: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M. 1992, ApJ, 391, 608}
2043: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., \& McMahon, R. G. 1998, ApJ, 502, L99}
2044: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., \& McMahon, R. G. 1999,
2045: The Hy-Redshift Universe: Galaxy Formation and Evolution at
2046: High Redshift,
2047: ASP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 193, Edited by Andrew J. Bunker and
2048: Wil J. M. van Breugel. I., 554}
2049: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., McMahon, R. G., Capak, R., Iwamuro, F.,
2050: Kneib, J. -P., Maihara, T., \& Motohara, K. 2002, ApJ, 568, L75,
2051: Erratum; ApJ, 576, L99}
2052: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., \& McMahon, R. G. 1996, Nature, 382, 231}
2053: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., McMahon, R. G., \& Cowie, L. L. 1999, ApJ, 522, L9}
2054: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., McMahon, R. G., \& Egami, E. 1996, ApJ, 459, L53}
2055: \reference{1}{Hu, E. M., Songaila, A., Cowie, L. L., \& Stockton, A. 1991,
2056: ApJ, 368, 28}
2057: \reference{1}{Hughes, D. H., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 241}
2058: \reference{1}{Hunstead, R. W., Pettini, M., \& Fletcher, A. B. 1990, ApJ, 356, 23}
2059: \reference{1}{Ikeuchi, S. 1981, PASJ, 33, 211}
2060: \reference{1}{Iwata, I., et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, 415}
2061: \reference{1}{Januzzi, B. T., \& Dey, A. 1999, Photometric Redshifts and
2062: High-Redshift Galaxies, edited by E. J. Weymann, L. J.
2063: Storrie-Lombardi, M. Sawicki, \& R. J. Brunner (San Francisco;
2064: ASP), 111}
2065: \reference{1}{Kashikawa, N., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 53}
2066: \reference{1}{Keel, W. C., Cohen, S. H., Windhorst, R. A., \& Waddington,
2067: I. 1999, AJ, 118, 2547}
2068: \reference{1}{Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 189}
2069: \reference{1}{Kodaira, K., et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, L17}
2070: \reference{1}{Kudritzki, R. -P., et al. 2000, ApJ, 536, 19}
2071: \reference{1}{Lanzetta, K. M., Yahil, A., \& Fern\'andez-Soto, A. 1996,
2072: Nature, 381, 759}
2073: \reference{1}{Lehnert, M. D., \& Bremer, M. 2003, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0202431)}
2074: \reference{1}{Larson, R. B. 1974, MNRAS, 169, 229}
2075: \reference{1}{Leibundgut, B., \& Robertson, J. G. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 711}
2076: \reference{1}{Loeb, A., \& Barkana, R. 2001, ARA\&A, 39, 19}
2077: \reference{1}{Lowenthal, J. D., Hogan, C. J., Green, R. F., Caulet, A.,
2078: Woodgate, B. E., Brown, L., \& Foltz, C. B. 1991, ApJ, 377, L73}
2079: \reference{1}{Lowenthal, J. D., Koo, D. C., Guzman, R., Gallego, J.,
2080: Phillips, A. C., Faber, S. M., Vogt, N. P., Illingworth, G. D.,
2081: \& Gronwall, C. 1997, ApJ, 481, 637}
2082: \reference{1}{Lu, L., Sargent, W. L. W., \& Barlow, T. A. 1998, AJ, 115, 55}
2083: \reference{1}{Macchetto, F., Lipari, S., Giavalisco, M., Turnshek, D. A.,
2084: \& Sparks, W. B. 1993, ApJ, 404, 511}
2085: \reference{1}{Madau, P., Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M. E., Giavalisco, M.,
2086: Steidel, C. C., \& Fruchter, A. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388}
2087: \reference{1}{Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., \& Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 498, 106}
2088: \reference{1}{Maier, C., et al. 2003, A\&A, 402, 79}
2089: \reference{1}{Maihara, T., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, 25}
2090: \reference{1}{Malhotra, S., \& Rhoads, J. E. 2002, ApJ, 565. L71}
2091: \reference{1}{Manning, C., Stern, D., Spinrad, H., \& Bunker, A. 2000,
2092: ApJ, 537, 65}
2093: \reference{1}{McCarthy, P. J. 1993, ARA\&A, 31, 639}
2094: \reference{1}{Meier, D. L. 1976, ApJ, 207, 343}
2095: \reference{1}{Mendez, R. H., Guerrero, M. A., Freeman, K. C., Arnaboldi, M.,
2096: Kudritzki, R. P., Hopp, U., Capaccioli, M., \& Ford, H.
2097: 1997, ApJ, 491, L23}
2098: \reference{1}{Miralda-Escud\'e, J. 1998, ApJ, 501, 15}
2099: \reference{1}{Miralda-Escud\'e, J., Cen, R., Ostriker, J. P., \& Rauch, M.
2100: 1996, ApJ, 471, 582}
2101: \reference{1}{Miralda-Escud\'e, J., \& Rees, M. J. 1997, ApJ, 478, L57}
2102: \reference{1}{Miralda-Escud\'e, J., \& Rees, M. 1998, ApJ, 497, 21}
2103: \reference{1}{M{\o}ller, P., \& Warren, S. J. 1993, A\&A, 270, 43}
2104: \reference{1}{M{\o}ller, P., Warren, S. J., \& Fynbo, J. U. 1998, A\&A, 330, 19}
2105: \reference{1}{Nakamoto, T., Umemura, M., \& Susa, H. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 593}
2106: \reference{1}{Nakamura, F., \& Umemura, M. 1999, ApJ, 515, 239}
2107: \reference{1}{Nakamura, F., \& Umemura, M. 2001, ApJ, 548, 19}
2108: \reference{1}{Ohta, K., et al. 2000, PASJ, 52, 557}
2109: \reference{1}{Ohyama, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Hibbard, J. E., \& Vacca, W. D. 1999,
2110: AJ, 117, 2617}
2111: \reference{1}{Ohyama, Y., et al. 2003a, PASJ, 54, 891}
2112: \reference{1}{Ohyama, Y., et al. 2003b, ApJ, 591, L9}
2113: \reference{1}{Oke, J. B., \& Korycansky. D. G. 1982, ApJ, 255, 110}
2114: \reference{1}{Ostriker, J. P., \& Cowie, L. L. 1981, ApJ, 243, L27}
2115: \reference{1}{Ostriker, J. P., \& Gnedin, N. Y. 1996, ApJ, 472, L63}
2116: \reference{1}{Ouchi, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 582, 60}
2117: \reference{1}{Pahre, M. A., \& Djorgovski, S. G. 1995, ApJ, 449, L1}
2118: \reference{1}{Partridge, R. B., \& Peebles, P. J. E. 1967, ApJ, 147, 868}
2119: \reference{1}{Peebles, P. J. E. 1993, Principles of Physical Cosmology
2120: (Princeton University Press: Princeton), Chapter 23}
2121: \reference{1}{Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Cuby, J. -G.,
2122: Dickinson, M., Moorwood, A. F. M., Adelberger, K. L.,
2123: Giavalisco, M. 2001, ApJ, 554, 981}
2124: \reference{1}{Pettini, M., Smith, L. J., King, D. L., \& Hunstead, R. W.
2125: 1997, ApJ, 486, 665}
2126: \reference{1}{Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M.,
2127: \& Giavalisco, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 96}
2128: \reference{1}{Pritchet, C. J. 1994, PASP, 106, 1052}
2129: \reference{1}{Rees, M. J. 1996, The Hubble Space Telescope \& The High Redshift
2130: Universe, The 37th HX conference, edited by N. R. Tanvir,
2131: A. Aragon-Salamanca, \& J. V. Wall (World Scientific), 115}
2132: \reference{1}{Rees, M. J. 1999, After the Dark Age: When Galaxies were Young,
2133: edited by S. Holt and E. Smith (American Institute of Physics
2134: Press), 13}
2135: \reference{1}{Rhoads, J. E., \& Malhotra, S. 2001, ApJ, 563, L5}
2136: \reference{1}{Rhoads, J. E., Malhotra, S., Dey, A., Stern, D., Spinrad, H.,
2137: \& Januzzi, B. T. 2000, ApJ, 545, L85}
2138: \reference{1}{Rhoads, J. E., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1006}
2139: \reference{1}{Sasaki, S., \& Umemura, M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 104}
2140: \reference{1}{Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C., Adelberger, K. L.,
2141: Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., \& Pettini, M. 2001, ApJ, 562, 95}
2142: \reference{1}{Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger, K. L.
2143: 2003, ApJ, 588, 65}
2144: \reference{1}{Sheinis, A. I., Miller, J. S., Bolte, M., \& Sutin, B.
2145: 2000, SPIE, 4008, 522}
2146: \reference{1}{Shioya, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Murayama, T., Nishiura, S.,
2147: Nagao, T., \& Kakazu, Y. 2002a, ApJ, 576, 36}
2148: \reference{1}{Shioya, Y., et al. 2002b, PASJ, 54, 975}
2149: \reference{1}{Songaila, A. E., \& Cowie, L. L. 1996, AJ, 112, 335}
2150: \reference{1}{Songaila, A. E., \& Cowie, L. L. 2002, AJ, 123, 2183}
2151: \reference{1}{Songaila, A. E., Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., \& McMahon, R. G.
2152: 1999, ApJ, 525, L5}
2153: \reference{1}{Spergel, D. N., et al. 2003 (astro-ph/0302209)}
2154: \reference{1}{Spinrad, H., Stern, D., Bunker, A., Dey, A., Lanzetta, K.,
2155: Yahil, A., Pascarelle, S., \& Fern\'andez-Soto, A. 1998,
2156: AJ, 116, 2617}
2157: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C. 1990, ApJS, 74, 37}
2158: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Giavalisco, M.,
2159: Dickinson, M., \& Pettini, M. 1999, ApJ, 519, 1}
2160: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., Pettini,
2161: M., Dickinson, M., \& Giavalisco, M. 2000, ApJ, 532, 170}
2162: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., \& Hamilton, D. 1992, AJ, 104, 941}
2163: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., \& Hamilton, D. 1993, AJ, 105, 2017}
2164: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., \&
2165: Adelberger, K. L. 1996a, AJ, 112, 352}
2166: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \&
2167: Adelberger, K. L. 1996b, ApJ, 462, L17}
2168: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger, K. L. 2001,
2169: ApJ, 546, 665}
2170: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Hamilton, D. 1995, AJ, 110, 2519}
2171: \reference{1}{Steidel, C. C., Sargent, W. L. W., \& Dickinson, M. 1991,
2172: AJ, 101, 1187}
2173: \reference{1}{Stern, D., Bunker, A., Spinrad, H., \& Dey, A. 2000a,
2174: ApJ, 537, 73}
2175: \reference{1}{Stern, D., \& Spinrad, H. 1999, PASP, 111, 1475}
2176: \reference{1}{Stern, D., et al. 2000b, Nature, 408, 560}
2177: \reference{1}{Stockton, A. 1999, Ap\&SS, 269, 209}
2178: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y. 2001, The Japan-Germany Workshop on Studies of
2179: Galaxies in the Young Universe with New Generation Telescopes,
2180: edited by N. Arimoto \& W. Duschul, in press (astro-ph/0301097)}
2181: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., Kawara, K., Nishida, M., Tamura, S., \&
2182: Nishida, M. T. 1988, AJ, 95, 1378}
2183: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., \& Shioya, Y. 2000, ApJ, 532, L13}
2184: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., \& Shioya, Y. 2001, ApJ, 547, 146}
2185: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., Shioya, Y., \& Kakazu, Y. 2001, ApJ, 562, L15}
2186: \reference{1}{Taniguchi, Y., et al. 2003, ApJ, 585, L97}
2187: \reference{1}{Thommes, E. 1999 in "From Stars to Galaxies to the Universe"
2188: (astro-ph/9812223)}
2189: \reference{1}{Thommes, E., Meisenheimer, K., Fockenbrock, R., Hippelein,
2190: H., R\"oser, H. -J., \& Becjwith, S. 1998, MNRAS, 293, L6}
2191: \reference{1}{Thompson, D., \& Djorgovski, S. G. 1995, AJ, 110, 982}
2192: \reference{1}{Thompson, D., Djorgovski, S. G., \& Trauger, J. 1995, AJ,
2193: 110, 963}
2194: \reference{1}{Tolman, R. C. 1930, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 16, 5111}
2195: \reference{1}{Totani, T., Yoshii, Y., Iwamuro, F., Maihara, T., \& Motohara, K.
2196: 2001a, ApJ, 550, L137}
2197: \reference{1}{Totani, T., Yoshii, Y., Iwamuro, F., Maihara, T., \& Motohara, K.
2198: 2001b, ApJ, 558, L87}
2199: \reference{1}{Totani, T., Yoshii, Y., Iwamuro, F., Maihara, T., \& Motohara, K.
2200: 2001c, ApJ, 559, 592}
2201: \reference{1}{Tresse, L., \& Maddox, S. J. 1998, ApJ, 495, 691}
2202: \reference{1}{Treyer, M. A., Ellis, R. S., Milliard, B., Donas, J., \& Bridges, T. J.
2203: 1998, MNRAS, 300, 303}
2204: \reference{1}{Tytler, D. 1981, Nature, 291, 289}
2205: \reference{1}{van Breugel, W., De Breuck, C., Stanford, S. A., Stern, D.,
2206: Rttgering, H., \& Miley, G. 1999, ApJ, 518, L61}
2207: \reference{1}{van den Bergh, S., Abraham, R. G., Ellis, R. S., Tanvir, N. R.,
2208: Santiago, B. X., \& Glazebrook, K. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 359}
2209: \reference{1}{Warren, S. J., \& M{\o}ller, P. 1996, A\&A, 311, 25}
2210: \reference{1}{Weymann, E. J., Stern, D., Bunker, A., Spinrad, H., Chaffee,
2211: F. H., Thompson, R. I., \& Storrie-Lombardi, L. 1998,
2212: ApJ, 505, L95}
2213: \reference{1}{Weymann, R. J., Carswell, R. F., \& Smith, M. G. 1981,
2214: ARA\&A, 19, 41}
2215: \reference{1}{Williams, R. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335}
2216: \reference{1}{Williams, R. E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 2735}
2217: \reference{1}{Wolf, C., et al. 2001, A\&A, 365, 681}
2218: \reference{1}{Wolf, C., et al. 2003, A\&A, 401, 73}
2219: \reference{1}{Wolfe, A. M., Lanzetta, K. M., Foltz, C. B., \& Chaffee, F. H.
2220: 1995, ApJ, 454, 698}
2221: \reference{1}{Wolfe, A. M., Lanzetta, K. M., Turnshek, D. A., \& Oke, J. B.
2222: 1992, ApJ, 385, 151}
2223: \reference{1}{Yahata, N., Lanzetta, K. M., Chen, H. -W., Fern\'andez-Soto, A.,
2224: Pascarelle, S. M., Yahil, A., \& Puetter, R. C. 2000, ApJ, 538, 493}
2225: \reference{1}{Yan, H., Windhorst, R. A., \& Cohen, S. H. 2002, astro-ph/0212179}
2226: \reference{1}{Yee, H. K. C., Ellingson, E., Bechtold, J., Carlberg, R. G.,
2227: Cuillandre, J. -C. 1996, AJ, 111, 1783}
2228: \reference{1}{Yoshii, Y., \& Saio, H. 1986, ApJ, 301, 587}
2229: \reference{1}{Zhang, Y., Anninos, P., Norman, M. L., \& Meiksin, A. 1997,
2230: ApJ, 485, 496}
2231: \end{references}
2232:
2233: \end{document}
2234:
2235:
2236: