1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % 2003/VI/16, DByN
4: %
5: %
6: %
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8:
9: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10:
11: %\accepted{}
12: %\journalid{}{}
13: %\articleid{}{}
14:
15: %\lefthead{Mohanty et al.}
16: %\righthead{TW Hydrae Brown Dwarfs}
17:
18: %\received{2003 January}
19:
20: \voffset0.1in
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \def\hal{{H\alpha} }
24: \def\av{A_V}
25: \def\lum{{\mathcal{L}}_{bol}}
26: \def\logten{log_{10}}
27: \def\na{\ion{Na}{1}\ }
28: \def\pot{\ion{K}{1}\ }
29: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$\ }
30: \def\kmsp{km s$^{-1}$ pix$^{-1}$\ }
31: \def\cms{cm s$^{-1}$\ }
32: \def\cmc{cm$^{-3}$\ }
33: \def\cmss{cm$^{2}$ s$^{-1}$\ }
34: \def\cmcs{cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$\ }
35: \def\msun{M$_\odot$\ }
36: \def\lsun{L$_\odot$\ }
37: \def\mj{M$_J$\ }
38: \def\teff{T$_{e\! f\! f}$~}
39: \def\gv{{\it g}~}
40: \def\vsini{{\it v}~sin{\it i}~}
41: \def\vrad{v$_{\it rad}$~}
42: \def\lbol{L_{\it bol}}
43: \def\lhal{L_{H\alpha}}
44: \def\fhal{F_{H\alpha}}
45: \def\fbol{F_{\it bol}}
46: \def\eqwhal{EW_{H\alpha}}
47: \def\h2o{H$_2$O}
48:
49:
50: \title{Magellan Echelle Spectroscopy of TW Hydrae Brown Dwarfs}
51:
52: \author{Subhanjoy Mohanty}
53: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.}
54: \author{Ray Jayawardhana}
55: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.}
56: \and
57: \author{David Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s}
58: \affil{Laboratorio de Astof\'{\i}sica Espacial y F\'{\i}sica Fundamental, INTA, 28080 Madrid, Spain.}
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61: We present high-resolution optical spectroscopy of four candidate
62: members of the nearby TW Hydrae young association including three
63: brown dwarfs (2MASS 1207-3932, 2MASS 1139-3159 and TWA 5B) and one T
64: Tauri multiple star (TWA 5A). Using echelle spectra from the
65: Magellan Baade 6.5-meter telescope, we confirm the pre-main sequence
66: status and cluster membership of the substellar candidates, through
67: the detection of LiI, NaI consistent with low gravity, and radial
68: velocity. Given their late spectral type
69: ($\sim$M8) and the youth of the association (age $\sim$ 10Myr),
70: cluster membership certifies these three objects as very low-mass
71: young brown dwarfs. One of them (2MASS 1207-3932) shows
72: strong emission both in the Hydrogen Balmer series (H$\alpha$ to
73: H$\epsilon$) and in HeI (4471, 5876, 6678 and 7065\AA), compared to
74: other young brown dwarfs of similar spectral type. The H$\alpha$ line
75: is also relatively broad (10\% width $\sim$ 200 \kms) and asymmetric.
76: These characteristics suggest that 2MASS 1207-3932 is a (weak)
77: accretor. While we cannot rule out activity, comparison to a flaring
78: field dwarf implies that such activity would have to be quite anomalous.
79: The verification of accretion would make 2MASS 1207-3932 the oldest
80: actively accreting brown dwarf known to date, suggesting that inner
81: disk lifetimes in substellar objects can be comparable to those in
82: stars, consistent with a similar formation mechanism. Finally,
83: TWA 5A appears to be a variable accretor: observations
84: separated by two days show broad accretion-like H$\alpha$
85: (10\% width $\sim$270 \kms), with significant changes
86: in the H$\alpha$ profile, as well as in the strengths of HeI, Na D and
87: [OI6300]. TWA 5A is known to be a close triple; thus,
88: our result implies that long-lived disks can exist even in multiple systems.
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91: \keywords{stars: low mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main-sequence ---
92: circumstellar matter --- open clusters and associations:
93: individual (TW Hydrae)}
94:
95: \section{Introduction}
96: The recent identification of several groups of young stars within
97: 100 parsecs of the Sun has generated widespread interest (Jayawardhana
98: \& Greene 2001). Given their proximity and age differences, these groups
99: are ideally suited for detailed studies of the origin and
100: early evolution of stars, brown dwarfs (BDs) and planets.
101: Perhaps the most intensely studied among these groups is the TW Hydrae
102: Association (TWA), which consists of $\sim$20 co-moving stars
103: (Zuckerman et al. 2001) at a distance of 47--67 pc
104: and dispersed over some 20 degrees on the sky. The members are mostly
105: late-type (K and M) stars, and include several
106: interesting multiple systems (Brandeker, Jayawardhana \& Najita 2003,
107: BJN03 hereafter, and references therein) and one A star. At an age
108: of $\sim$10 Myr, the TWA fills a significant gap in the age sequence
109: between $\sim$1-Myr-old T Tauri stars in molecular clouds like
110: Taurus-Auriga and the $\sim$50-Myr-old open clusters
111: such as IC 2391. That is particularly useful for deriving
112: strong constraints on disk evolution timescales. Their diverse disk
113: properties suggest that the TWA stars are at an age when disks
114: are rapidly evolving, through coagulation of dust and dissipation of
115: gas (Jayawardhana et al. 1999a; 1999b).
116:
117: Lowrance et al. (1999) found a BD candidate $\sim$2\arcsec~
118: from TWA 5A (CD -33$^{\circ}$ 7795); TWA 5A and 5B are now confirmed
119: as a common proper motion pair (BJN03 and
120: references therein). Recently, Gizis (2002) reported two isolated
121: substellar candidates from the 2-Micron All-Sky Survey that may be
122: members of the TWA. Together, these three objects
123: constitute a unique sample to explore the evolution
124: of BD characteristics on a 10-Myr timescale.
125: %
126: % In particular,
127: %it is of great interest to compare their properties to those of younger
128: %counterparts in star-forming regions.
129: %
130: % such as $\rho$ Ophiuchus, IC 348,
131: % Taurus, and Upper Scorpius.
132: Here we report high-resolution optical spectroscopy that confirm
133: the youth, group membership, and substellar status of these three
134: objects. We also present a spectrum of the T Tauri multiple system
135: TWA 5A, to which TWA 5B is bound. We use these spectra
136: to investigate accretion, rotation and chromospheric activity.
137:
138: \section{Observations \& Analysis}
139: We obtained high resolution optical spectra using the Magellan
140: Inamori Kyocera Echelle spectrograph (Bernstein et al. 2002) on the Baade
141: 6.5-meter telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile in 2003 May.
142: Consecutive spectra were obtained for the three BD candidate members:
143: 3$\times$1200s for 2MASS 1207-3932 (May 8), 3$\times$1500s for
144: 2MASS 1139-2649 (May 9), and 2$\times$1800s for TWA 5B (May 10).
145: Additionally, we obtained two 600s exposures of TWA 5A, one each on
146: May 8 and 10. The spectra of the 2MASS objects (from now on, 2M1207 and 2M1139)
147: and the May 8 spectrum of
148: TWA 5A were taken with a 1\arcsec-wide by 5\arcsec-long slit.
149: The May 10 spectra of TWA 5A and 5B were obtained with a narrower
150: 0.7\arcsec$\times$5\arcsec~ slit. The separation between TWA 5A
151: and 5B is $\sim$ 2\arcsec, and TWA 5B is $\sim$ 7 magnitudes fainter
152: in the optical. To ensure no contamination of the 5B spectrum by 5A,
153: therefore, we observed 5B with a narrower slit (0.7\arcsec),
154: under optimal seeing conditions (better than 0.5\arcsec), with the
155: slit positioned roughly perpendicular to the 5A-5B axis.
156: %
157: %
158: % We could
159: % not obtain spectra for TWA 5A when the two objects were as cleanly
160: % separated. However, this does not hamper our analysis, since
161: % contamination of the 5A spectrum by the much fainter 5B is negligible
162: % in the optical even if both are in the slit.
163: The coverage obtained was $\sim$ 3200--4800\AA~ in the blue, and $\sim$
164: 4800--8800\AA~ in the red, with overlapping orders. The spectra are
165: unbinned in wavelength, and binned by 2 pixels in the spatial direction.
166: The 1\arcsec~ slit yielded a spectral resolution of $R\sim$19000 in the
167: red, and 25000 in the blue; the 0.7\arcsec~ slit resulted in $R\sim$27000
168: and 36000 respectively. The data were reduced in standard fashion using IDL
169: routines. We derive rotational velocities (\vsini) for our
170: targets by cross-correlating with a `spun-up' template of a slowly rotating
171: standard. We used a combination of dwarf and giant spectra for the
172: template (see Mohanty \& Basri 2003). Radial velocities (\vrad) were
173: found by cross-correlating against the M6 dwarf Gl 406
174: (\vrad$\approx$19 \kms). The \vsini and \vrad are listed in Table 1.
175:
176:
177: \section{Results \& Discussion}
178:
179: \subsection{Membership \& Substellar Status}
180: All three TWA BD candidates have spectral types of $\sim$M8-M8.5 (Gizis 2002; Webb
181: et al. 1999), consistent with the features in our high-resolution data (e.g.,
182: strong TiO bands). In all three, we detect LiI 6708 \AA. They also exhibit narrow
183: NaI ($\sim$ 8200\AA) absorption profiles indicative of low gravity (intermediate
184: between giants and dwarfs), and strong dMe-like $\hal$ emission (Fig. 1;
185: equivalent widths --EW-- for $\hal$ and LiI given in Table 1). In concert, these
186: facts confirm the Pre-Main Sequence (PMS) status of TWA 5B, 2M1207
187: and 2M1139: we can confidently exclude field M dwarfs (no LiI), low-mass field BDs
188: with undepleted Li (type $\sim$ L2 or later; gravity $\gtrsim$ dwarfs values),
189: Li-rich giants (much lower gravity; $\hal$ in absorption) and sub-giants (MS lifetime of
190: M dwarfs too long for M-type subgiants to have formed yet).
191:
192: For all three objects, our derived \vrad are commensurate with those found
193: for other, bona-fide members of the association (Torres et al. 2003).
194: TWA 5B is also confirmed as a common proper motion companion to TWA 5A
195: (BJN03 and references therein). Gizis (2002) has found a proper motion
196: consistent with membership for 2M1207. In conjunction with our
197: \vrad measurements and confirmation of PMS status, these observations
198: verify TWA membership for both TWA 5B and 2M1207. For 2M1139,
199: Gizis (2002) found a proper motion apparently inconsistent
200: with membership. However, he notes that the astrometric uncertainty is
201: large. Therefore, given its PMS status and a \vrad consistent with
202: other members, we consider it likely that 2M1139 also belongs to the
203: TWA. More precise astrometric measurents are required to verify this.
204:
205: All objects with detected Lithium and \teff less than about 2800K are
206: expected to be substellar, regardless of age (see Basri 2000).
207: The M8-8.5 spectral type of 2M1207, 2M1139 and TWA 5B, which implies
208: \teff $<$ 2800K
209: (e.g., Luhman 1999), therefore ensures that they are BDs, since they all show
210: Li. An age is required, however, to derive a mass.
211: Since we confirm association membership for at least 2M1207
212: and TWA 5B, an age of $\sim$ 10 Myr is justified for them.
213: Comparing to the evolutionary tracks of Chabrier et al. (2000) then yields
214: $\sim$ 35
215: Jupiters for both. The same value is obtained for 2M1139, if it too is a member. Even
216: if it is not, one can still use the fact of Li detection, and a \teff estimate
217: ($\sim$2700K; Luhman 1999), to put upper limits on mass and age of $\sim$ 65 Jupiters and
218: $\sim$ 250 Myr respectively, using the same models.
219:
220: \subsection{Accretion}
221: At very low masses and weak accretion rates, usual accretion indicators
222: (e.g., Stark broadening of $\hal$ wings, emission in OI and CaII) may
223: disappear. Simultaneously, other lines commonly associated with
224: accretion at higher masses (e.g., HeI, upper Balmer lines) may appear
225: in non-accreting, chromospherically active low-mass objects due to
226: the lowering of the photospheric continuum with decreasing $T_{eff}$ (e.g.,
227: Jayawardhana, Mohanty, \& Basri 2003, hereafter JMB03). Consequently,
228: it is difficult to distinguish between accretion and activity in weakly
229: accreting low-mass objects.
230:
231: Here we conservatively identify probable accretors based on asymmetric
232: and broad $\hal$ (10\% width $\gtrsim$200\kms, following JMB03)
233: {\it and} the detection of usual indicators of accretion
234: at larger masses, such as HeI and upper Balmer lines, at a level
235: {\it higher} than the average for a given spectral type
236: (the same criteria adopted by Muzerolle et al. 2003).
237: By these conditions, 2M1139 and TWA 5B are chromospherically
238: active, but not accreting. 2M1207 and TWA 5A, however, do appear
239: to be accretors, as discussed below.
240:
241: {\bf{\it 2MASS 1207-3932}:} As Fig. 2 shows, significant emission is seen
242: in HeI and in the upper Balmer series lines upto H$\epsilon$ in this object.
243: A perusal of the recent study by Muzerolle et al. (2003), meanwhile, shows
244: that non-accreting M7-8.5 objects in their sample usually do not show HeI (at
245: 6678\AA, the only HeI line they include), or Balmer lines beyond
246: $H\beta$. Next, in Fig. 3, we show the normalized $\hal$ profiles
247: from our 3 consecutive spectra of 2M1207.
248: A clear asymmetry is seen in the first and third profiles,
249: with much enhanced emission blueward of line-center. In
250: the second profile, the full-width at 10\% of peak flux is $\sim$ 200
251: \kms: not unreasonable for very low-mass, low accretion-rate objects,
252: and similar to that seen by JMB03 in a couple of mid- to late M accretors.
253: In the first and last profiles, the width is slightly less,
254: at $\sim$ 170 \kms. However, superimposing the three spectra (not shown)
255: reveals that the line wings are exactly the same; the smaller
256: 10\% width in the first and last is artificially induced simply
257: by the increase in peak flux. We therefore adopt $\sim$ 200\kms
258: as the more robust value. By all our criteria, therefore,
259: 2M1207 appears to be (weakly) accreting.
260: Can the emission in this object simply be a result of enhanced
261: activity compared to other, similar spectral type objects? While we
262: cannot rule this out, the following argument makes this seem unlikely.
263: In one of our high-resolution spectra of the field M7.5 dwarf LHS 2397A,
264: taken during a flare, the $\hal$ EW is $\sim$ 30 \AA~ (Mohanty
265: \& Basri 2003), i.e., almost exactly the same as observed in 2M1207.
266: If the emission in 2M1207 were due to chromospheric activity, we would
267: expect its line profiles to look very similar to those of LHS 2397A.
268: given the nearly identical spectral types.
269: The line profile comparison is shown in Fig.3. Clearly, the LHS 2397A
270: $\hal$ profile much more symmetric compared to the first and last 2M1207
271: spectra, and significantly narrower in all three cases: 2M1207 exhibits
272: broader $\hal$ line wings, as expected from accretion.
273: The HeI line at 6678\AA~ is also much stronger in 2M1207 than in
274: LHS 2397A; since the spectral types (and hence the underlying
275: continuum) are almost the same, the actual flux in HeI emission is
276: thus also higher. This too indicates that the same physical process
277: is not responsible for the emission in the two objects; in particular,
278: excess HeI emission can arise from the very hot accretion-shock region.
279: We suggest, therefore, that 2M1207 is a bona-fide accretor.
280: However, our arguments against activity are not ironclad, and the presence
281: of accretion needs to be checked through other diagnostics.
282: The lack of a $K-L^\prime$ excess in 2M1207 (Jayawardhana et al. 2003)
283: could be the result of a nearly edge-on disk inclination or grain growth.
284:
285: If accretion in 2M1207 is confirmed, it would suggest that inner disk
286: lifetimes of substellar objects can be comparable to those of their
287: stellar counterparts, and further strengthen the case for a common
288: formation mechanism for BDs and stars.
289:
290: {\bf{\it TWA 5A}:} The 10\% full-width of the $\hal$ line in TWA 5A
291: is $\sim$ 270 \kms, which is commensurate with accretion (e.g., JMB03).
292: However, this object is known to be a triple, with a $\sim$ 0''.06
293: binary resolved by adaptive optics (BJN03) as well as a spectroscopic
294: companion (Torres et al. 2003).
295: %Indeed, we possibly detect a second $\hal$ component (all three stars
296: %are within our slit) as a narrow peak at line-center in one of the spectra,
297: %superimposed on the broad $\hal$ profile (Fig. 1, grey line).
298: To discount the possibility that
299: the $\hal$ line is broadened to accretion-like widths simply due to
300: blending of $\hal$ from the three stars, we compare our two spectra of
301: TWA 5A, obtained two days apart. Fig. 4 shows that the spectra are
302: exactly the same, {\it except} in lines that are accretion indicators.
303: This implies that the spectral change is not due to variations in
304: line-blending, but in the intrinsic parameters of (at least) one of
305: the TWA 5A components. In particular, we see that the first spectrum
306: (in black) shows excess red-shifted emission and blue-shifted absorption
307: in $\hal$, HeI5876\AA{ } and Na D, as well as excess emission in [OI6300],
308: compared to the second spectrum (in grey). Though $\hal$, NaD and
309: HeI emission may conceivably arise from chromospheric activity, the
310: blue-shifted absorption seen in these three lines strongly suggests
311: accretion. Furthermore, [OI6300] is an
312: excellent diagnostic of outflowing winds associated with accretion;
313: it is often seen in accreting CTTs, but never in non-accreting WTTs
314: (Muzerolle et al. 2003). All this supports ongoing accretion in the
315: TWA 5A system. The fact that the two spectra differ significantly in
316: the accretion diagnostics implies that the process is variable. Our results also
317: suggest that inner disks can be long-lived even in close multiple systems.
318:
319:
320: \subsection{Rotation \& Activity}
321: In field dwarfs down to $\sim$ M8, a saturation-type rotation-activity
322: connection is seen: those rotating faster than $\sim$ 5 \kms exhibit
323: saturated levels of chromospheric $\hal$ emission, while slower
324: rotators show a range of smaller $\hal$ fluxes (Mohanty \& Basri
325: 2003). For our young sample, we will discuss this
326: issue in more detail in a future paper, after deriving accurate \teff in order to
327: convert the observed $\hal$ EWs to fluxes. However, we note here that the $\hal$ EW
328: observed in
329: our three M8 PMS objects are, at the very least, comparable to those
330: seen in saturated field dwarfs of the same spectral type; this is in
331: keeping with their moderately rapid rotation ($>$ 10\kms). In 2M1207,
332: the $\hal$ emission is far stronger than in merely
333: saturated field dwarfs; as discussed above, the EW in
334: this case is comparable to that in strongly flaring M8 dwarfs.
335: Similar EWs have been seen in some other young, (apparently)
336: non-accreting late-M objects, lending support to the idea that
337: activity may be enhanced in young low-mass objects compared to field
338: objects of similar spectral type (e.g.,
339: Jayawardhana, Mohanty, \& Basri 2002, 2003). However, the
340: $\hal$ profile in these cases is narrow and symmetric. If 2M1207
341: were a non-accretor, then the strong asymmetries seen in at least two of
342: its $\hal$ profiles would be puzzling.
343:
344: \acknowledgments
345: We are most grateful to Gibor Basri for insightful discussions. We thank
346: the referee Jeff Valenti for a prompt review and the Magellan staff
347: for their assistance. S.M. is indebted to the SIM-YSO group for the
348: postdoctoral fellowship that made this research possible. This work was
349: supported in part by NSF grant AST-0205130 and NASA grant NAG5-11905 to
350: R.J.
351:
352: \clearpage
353: \begin{references}
354: \reference{} Basri, G. 2000, \araa, 38, 485
355: %\reference{} Basri, G., et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 363
356: \reference{} Bernstein, R.A., et al. 2002, Proc. SPIE 4841, 1694
357: \reference{} Brandeker, A., Jayawardhana, R. \& Najita, J. 2003, AJ, in press [BJN03]
358: \reference{} Chabrier, G., et al. 2000, ApJ, 542, 464
359: \reference{} Gizis, J.E. 2002, ApJ, 575, 484
360: %\reference{} Jayawardhana, R. et al. 1998, ApJ, 503, L79
361: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R. et al. 1999a, ApJ, 520, L41
362: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R. et al. 1999b, ApJ, 521, L129
363: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R. \& Greene, T.P. (ed.) 2001, {\it Young Stars Near Earth: Progress and Prospects},
364: ASP Conf. Ser. 244 (San Fransisco: ASP)
365: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2002, ApJ, 578, L141 % [JMB02]
366: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, in press [JMB03]
367: \reference{} Jayawardhana, R., Ardila, D.R., Stelzer, B., \& Haisch, K.E., Jr. 2003, AJ, in press
368: %\reference{} Koerner, D.W., Ressler, M.E., Werner, M.W., \& Backman, D.E. 1998, ApJ, 503, L83
369: \reference{} Lowrance, P.J., et al. 1999, ApJ, 512, L69
370: \reference{} Luhman, K. 1999, ApJ, 525, 466
371: %\reference{} Mohanty, S., et al. 2003, \apj, submitted
372: \reference{} Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 583, 451
373: %\reference{} Muzerolle, J., Hartmann, L., \& Calvet, N. 1998, AJ, 116, 455
374: \reference{} Muzerolle, J., et al. 2003, ApJ, in press
375: \reference{} Torres, G., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 825
376: \reference{} Webb, R.A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 512, L63
377: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., Webb, R.A., Schwartz, M., \& Becklin, E.E. 2001, ApJ, 549, L233
378: \end{references}
379:
380: \clearpage
381:
382: \begin{figure}
383: \epsscale{0.55}
384: \plotone{f1.eps}
385: \caption{Averaged $\hal$ profiles for our targets (both profiles shown for TWA 5A).
386: Thick lines indicate the two probable accretors. The horizontal dashed lines
387: indicate the continuum and 10\% of peak emission. All profiles are shifted to
388: zero-velocity (approximate for TWA 5A; we have not calculated its \vrad).}
389: \end{figure}
390:
391: \begin{figure}
392: \epsscale{0.70}
393: \plotone{f2.eps}
394: \caption{Averaged HI and HeI emission in 2MASS 1207. A continuum was
395: detected around only some of these lines; these have been continuum-normalized
396: (continuum: dashed horizontal line). In the others, no true continuum was
397: detected, making flux or EW measurements impossible; these have only been
398: divided by the r.m.s. of the surrounding noise for clarity.
399: %
400: % {\it Top row}:
401: % H$\beta$, H$\gamma$, H$\delta$, H$\epsilon$ (H$\alpha$ in Fig.1).
402: %{\it Bottom row}: HeI at $\lambda\lambda$ 4471, 5876, 6568 \& 7065. }
403: %
404: }
405: \end{figure}
406:
407: \clearpage
408:
409: \begin{figure}
410: \epsscale{0.5}
411: \plotone{f3.eps}
412: \caption{{\it Top to bottom, left panels}: $\hal$ from our 3 spectra
413: of 2MASS 1207 (thick lines) compared to the $\hal$ in the flaring
414: field M7.5 dwarf LHS 2397A (observed at similar resolution on Keck HIRES).
415: %
416: % 2MASS 1207 shows distinct asymmetries and
417: %broader wings.%
418: %
419: {\it Top to bottom, right panels}: HeI6678\AA{} comparison.
420: %; the line is much stronger in 2MASS 1207 (the spectra are
421: %vertically offset for clarity). See text.}
422: %
423: }
424: \end{figure}
425:
426: \begin{figure}
427: \epsscale{0.50}
428: \plotone{f4.eps}
429: \caption{Comparison of two TWA 5A spectra, in regions containing
430: accretion-indicating lines ($\hal$, NaD, [OI6300], HeI5876).
431: The two spectra are exactly the same, except one of them
432: (black) shows excess emission in $\hal$, NaD, OI \& HeI, and
433: blue-shifted absorption in $\hal$, NaD \& HeI, compared to the other
434: spectrum (grey).}
435: \end{figure}
436: \clearpage
437:
438: \bigskip
439: \begin{center}
440: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
441: \tablecaption{\label{tab1} Spectroscopic Properties of TWA Targets}
442: \tablehead{
443: \colhead{Object} &
444: \colhead{Sp Type\tablenotemark{a}} &
445: \colhead{\vrad} &
446: \colhead{\vsini} &
447: \colhead{LiI EW\tablenotemark{b}} &
448: \colhead{H$\alpha$ EW\tablenotemark{b}} &
449: \colhead{H$\alpha$ 10\% FW\tablenotemark{c}} \\
450: & & (\kms) & (\kms) & (\AA) & (\AA) & (\kms) \\}
451:
452: \startdata
453: 2MASS 1207-3932 & M8 & 11.2$\pm$2 & 13$\pm$2 & 0.5 & 27.7 & 204$\pm$10 \\
454: 2MASS 1139-3159 & M8 & 11.6$\pm$2 & 25$\pm$2 & 0.5 & 7.3 & 111$\pm$10 \\
455: TWA 5B &$\sim$M8.5 & 13.4$\pm$2 & 16$\pm$2 & 0.3 & 5.1 & 162$\pm$10 \\
456: TWA 5A\tablenotemark{d} & M1.5 & -- & -- & 0.6 & 7.2/6.6\tablenotemark{e} & 266$\pm$10 \\
457: %TWA 5A\tablenotemark{d} & & & & & 6.6\tablenotemark{e} & 266$\pm$10 \\
458: \enddata
459: \tablenotetext{a}{Spectral types for 2MASS objects from Gizis (2002) and for TWA 5A \& 5B from Webb et al. (1999).}
460: \tablenotetext{b}{{\it Pseudo}-equivalent widths, for LiI \& $\hal$; estimated $\hal$ EW errors $\lesssim$ 10\%.}
461: %;
462: %the plethora of molecular lines make it impossible to determine the
463: %true continuum in these stars.}
464: %Errors on $\hal$ EW represent the
465: %difference between the EWs derived using the continuua measured on the
466: %left of the line and the right of the line; they represent our
467: %internal errors in measuring the pseudo-continuum level, and not on
468: %the (possibly systematic) offset between the true and pseudo-widths,
469: %which is impossible to estimate (see Mohanty \& Basri, 2003 for details).}
470: \tablenotetext{c}{For 2M1139 \& TWA 5B, we quote the average width from
471: their consecutive spectra over a single night. For 2M1207,
472: we adopt the $\hal$ 10\% width of only the second spectrum as the
473: realistic value (see text); the average width from
474: all three spectra is 187$\pm$10 \kms. For TWA 5A, we quote 10\% FW
475: values for both nights; they are very similar.}
476: \tablenotetext{d}{We did not derive \vrad or \vsini for the TWA 5A system, given
477: its known \vrad variability (Torres et al. 2003), and the questionable accuracy of
478: \vsini given possible line blending.}
479: \tablenotetext{e}{In TWA 5A, the larger $\hal$ EW is
480: for the spectrum with excess accretion-related emission. }
481: \end{deluxetable}
482: \end{center}
483:
484: \end{document}
485:
486:
487:
488:
489:
490:
491:
492:
493:
494:
495: