1: %% LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint,epsfig]{aastex}
4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6: \usepackage{amsmath}
7: \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
8: \usepackage{graphics}
9:
10: \makeatletter
11:
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
13: \providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
14: %% Special footnote code from the package 'stblftnt.sty'
15: %% Author: Robin Fairbairns -- Last revised Dec 13 1996
16: \let\SF@@footnote\footnote
17: \def\footnote{\ifx\protect\@typeset@protect
18: \expandafter\SF@@footnote
19: \else
20: \expandafter\SF@gobble@opt
21: \fi
22: }
23: \expandafter\def\csname SF@gobble@opt \endcsname{\@ifnextchar[%]
24: \SF@gobble@twobracket
25: \@gobble
26: }
27: \edef\SF@gobble@opt{\noexpand\protect
28: \expandafter\noexpand\csname SF@gobble@opt \endcsname}
29: \def\SF@gobble@twobracket[#1]#2{}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
32: \shorttitle{Relativistic observables for PSR~J1141--6545}
33: \shortauthors{Bailes et al.}
34: \makeatother
35:
36: \begin{document}
37:
38: \title{
39: Self-consistency of relativistic observables with general
40: relativity in the white dwarf-neutron star
41: binary pulsar PSR~J1141--6545.
42: }
43:
44: \renewcommand{\familydefault}{bch}
45:
46: \topmargin=0in % topmargin is 1/2 inch (note negative value)
47: \oddsidemargin=0in % left margin is 1 inch on right-hand pages
48: \evensidemargin=0in % same for left-hand pages in twosided document
49: \textwidth=6.5in % leaves 1 inch for the right margin
50: \textheight=8.5in % for the text.
51:
52: \headheight=4mm
53: \headsep=4mm
54:
55: \newcommand{\bsf}{\sffamily\bfseries}
56:
57: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{M$_{\odot}$}}
58: \newcommand{\rsun}{\mbox{R$_{\odot}$}}
59: \newcommand{\aopx}{\mbox{$\Delta_{\pi \rm M}$}}
60: \newcommand{\shap}{\mbox{$\Delta_{\rm S}$}}
61: \newcommand{\psr}{\mbox{PSR J1141$-$6545\,}}
62: \newcommand{\mcrit}{\mbox{$M_{\rm crit}\,$}}
63: \newcommand{\mpsr}{\mbox{$M_{\rm p}\,$}}
64: \newcommand{\mwd}{\mbox{$M_{\rm c}\,$}}
65:
66: \newcommand\wvect[1]{{\bsf #1}}
67: \newcommand\bvect[1]{{\bsf #1}$_{\bm 0}$}
68:
69: \newcommand\etal{et al.}
70:
71: \def\degr{\ifmmode^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}
72: \def\agep{\ifmmode\tau_{\rm c}\else$\tau_{\rm c}$\fi}
73: \def\agec{\ifmmode\tau_{\rm w}\else$\tau_{\rm w}$\fi}
74:
75: \affil{Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne
76: University of Technology, P.O.~Box 218 Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
77: mbailes@swin.edu.au}
78:
79: \author{ M. Bailes,
80: S. M. Ord,
81: H. S. Knight,
82: A. W. Hotan}
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85:
86: Here we report timing measurements of the relativistic binary pulsar
87: \psr\, that constrain
88: the component masses and demonstrate that the orbital
89: period derivative $\dot P_{\rm b}= (-4\pm 1)\times 10^{-13}$
90: is consistent with gravitational wave emission as
91: described by the general theory of relativity.
92: The mass of the neutron star and its companion
93: are 1.30$\pm$0.02 \msun\, and 0.986$\pm$0.02 \msun\, respectively,
94: suggesting a white dwarf companion, and extending the range of
95: systems for which general relativity provides a correct
96: description. On evolutionary grounds,
97: the progenitor mass of \psr \,should be near the
98: minimum for neutron star production. Its mass
99: is two standard deviations below the mean of
100: the other neutron stars, suggesting a relationship
101: between progenitor and remnant masses.
102: \end{abstract}
103:
104: \keywords{gravitational radiation, binary pulsars,
105: neutron star masses, general relativity, PSR J1141--6545}
106:
107: \section{Introduction}
108:
109: Our knowledge of
110: neutron star masses \cite{tc99} is derived largely
111: from three relativistic binary
112: pulsars with eccentric orbits and probable neutron star
113: companions \cite{wt03,sttw02,dk96}. The masses
114: of all known neutron stars exhibit a remarkably
115: narrow scatter (0.04\msun) about their mean of 1.35 \msun.
116: If one restricts attention to the neutron star pairs, the
117: mean is 1.37 \msun.
118: These binary pulsars have also been pivotal in tests of
119: the general theory of relativity (Taylor, Fowler and
120: McCulloch 1979)\nocite{tfm79}.
121:
122: Gravitational waves have never been observed directly. Our
123: best quantitative evidence for their existence comes from observations
124: of the binary pulsar PSR B1913+16 \nocite{dt91}
125: (Damour and Taylor 1991).
126: This pulsar has a negative orbital period
127: derivative that is consistent with the emission of
128: gravity waves at the 0.4\% level.
129: Unfortunately, the binary
130: PSR B1534+12 is so close to the Earth
131: that its proper motion induces a time-varying
132: Doppler term into the timing which prevents separation
133: of the relativistic contribution to the orbital
134: period derivative from the kinematic one \cite{bb96,sttw02}.
135: Until an independent distance
136: can be established, this pulsar's orbital period
137: derivative cannot verify the predictions of the
138: theory to better than $\sim 20$\%.
139: Nevertheless, measurement of PSR B1534+12's post-Keplerian
140: parameters have provided other tests of general
141: relativity \cite{sttw02}, and binary pulsars such
142: as PSR J0437--4715 have proved that the theory is
143: consistently in agreement with the most precise
144: observations \cite{vbb+01}.
145:
146: Discovered in the Parkes multibeam survey \nocite{klm+00a}
147: \psr\, is a 4.7$^{\rm h}$ binary pulsar with an eccentricity
148: of 0.17 that consists of a 394 ms relatively
149: youthful pulsar of characteristic age $\sim $1.4 Myr and an
150: unidentified companion star. Early observations \cite{klm+00a}
151: of the periastron advance suggested a pulsar mass $\mpsr<
152: 1.35$ \msun, and a companion $M_{\rm c}>0.97$ \msun. The
153: observed tight distribution of neutron star masses near
154: 1.35$\pm$0.04 \msun\, where the quoted error reflects a Gaussian
155: fit to the observed distribution,
156: suggested that this system probably
157: consisted of a $\mpsr\sim$ 1.3 \msun\, neutron star and
158: $\mwd \sim$ 1 \msun\, white dwarf companion. \psr\, was
159: therefore unique among the relativistic binary pulsars. Its
160: component masses argued for a white dwarf companion
161: yet its orbit was highly eccentric making it the first
162: of a new class of object. To date no white dwarf has
163: been optically identified.
164:
165: \psr\, is an exciting target for timing.
166: Firstly, scintillation observations have demonstrated a
167: clear modulation of the timescale of the interstellar
168: ``twinkling'' allowing derivation of the system's
169: angle of inclination and runaway velocity (Ord, Bailes
170: and van Straten 2002a)
171: \nocite{obv02}.
172: Two degenerate fits to the changing scintillation timescale
173: were possible. The observed distribution of neutron
174: star masses favoured the solution with
175: an inclination angle
176: ($i=76\pm 2.5\degr$) and center of mass velocity
177: in the plane of the sky of $V\sim 115$ km s$^{-1}$. These
178: results provide an independent estimate of the
179: system orientation to be compared with the timing.
180: Secondly,
181: neutral hydrogen observations (Ord, Bailes and van Straten
182: 2002b) \nocite{obv02b} have demonstrated that this
183: pulsar is in a favourable location in the Galaxy
184: where the observed orbital period derivative will, as in
185: the case of PSR B1913+16,
186: be dominated by the general relativistic contribution.
187: Finally, contrary to PSR B1913+16, which is a very
188: symmetric system with two neutron stars
189: of nearly equal mass, \psr\, is a very dissymmetric
190: system as it comprises a strongly self-gravitating
191: neutron star and a (relatively) weakly self-gravitating
192: white dwarf. Timing this system therefore tests
193: new aspects of relativistic theories of gravity \cite{de92,twdw92,
194: arz03}.
195:
196: \begin{figure}[here]
197: \label{fig:geometry}
198: \plotone{f1.eps}
199: \caption{
200: Constraints on the pulsar and companion masses. The shaded area
201: is excluded from a consideration of Kepler's laws. The sum
202: of the masses $M=2.2883\pm 0.0006 \msun$ is very accurately
203: defined from the relativistic
204: advance of periastron, $\dot{\omega}$, and is shown by the straight solid line
205: with a slope of --1.
206: The relativistic term $\gamma$ constrains the system to lie
207: between the dashed lines, and the measured orbital period
208: derivative $\dot P_{\rm b}$ suggests that the system masses
209: lie between the pair of curved solid lines.
210: This implies an inclination angle $i>75\degr$, consistent
211: with constraints from scintillation studies $i=76\pm2.5\degr$.
212: The derived component masses suggest
213: that the system consists of a 0.986$\pm$0.020 \msun white dwarf and a
214: 1.30$\pm$0.02 \msun pulsar. If the system radiates energy
215: at the rate predicted by general relativity,
216: the measured orbital
217: period derivative $\dot P_{\rm b} = (-4\pm1) \times 10^{-13}$
218: is consistent with the predicted value of ($-3.8\times10^{-13}$)
219: derived from the component masses. }
220: \end{figure}
221:
222: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
223:
224: Observations of \psr\ were conducted from January 2001 until February
225: 2003 at the Parkes 64\,m radio telescope as part of a scintillation
226: study. The data from two orthogonal linear polarisations were
227: detected and summed using a multi-channel filterbank consisting of
228: 2$\times$512$\times$0.5 MHz filters. These data were 1-bit sampled
229: every 125 $\mu$s and written to magnetic tape for offline processing
230: on the Swinburne University of Technology supercomputer. Observations
231: were usually greater than one orbit in duration, and there were
232: ten sessions, nine of which took place in the 15 months prior to
233: Feb 2003. The central
234: observing frequency was 1390 MHz and total intensity pulse profiles
235: were formed by folding the raw data at the topocentric period of the
236: pulsar for integration times of 60\,s.
237:
238: A fit to the arrival times was made for the standard pulsar spin,
239: astrometric, and Keplerian terms as well as three post-Keplerian
240: parameters using a relativistic model \nocite{dd86}
241: (Damour and Deruelle 1986). After incorporation
242: of archival timing data from the Australia Telescope National Facility
243: archives from July-August 1999 we found that our measurements of the
244: periastron advance $\dot \omega$, transverse Doppler and gravitational
245: redshift, $\gamma$ term, and orbital period derivative $\dot P_{\rm
246: b}$ became much more significant. These values are displayed in Table
247: 1. The archival data consisted mainly of data taken with a
248: 2$\times$96$\times$3 MHz filterbank system. We fit for a single
249: arbitrary offset between the two datasets to allow for the change in
250: instrumentation.
251:
252: \section{Interpretation}
253:
254: Newton's laws provide a relation between the system's
255: masses and inclination angle $i$, and the common observables
256: orbital period $P_{\rm b}$ and projected semi-major axis $x = (a \sin i)/c $.
257: This is often referred to as the pulsar mass function $f_{\rm P}$,
258: \begin{equation}
259: f_{\rm P}=
260: {{(\mwd \sin i)^3}\over{M^2}} =
261: \Big({{2\pi}\over{P_{\rm b}}}\Big)^2
262: {{(xc)^3}\over{G}}
263: \end{equation}
264: here $M$ is the sum of the masses, $G$ is Newton's gravitational
265: constant and $c$ is the speed of light. \mpsr and \mwd refer
266: to the mass of the pulsar and companion star respectively.
267:
268: General Relativity allows us to use the post-Keplerian terms
269: to derive component masses. The advance of periastron
270: gives us the sum of the masses.
271: \begin{equation}
272: \dot \omega = 3 \Big({{2 \pi}\over{P_{\rm b}}}\Big)^{5/3}
273: \Big({{G M}\over{c^3}}\Big)^{2/3}
274: (1-e^2)^{-1}
275: \end{equation}
276: Here $e$ is the orbital eccentricity.
277: The combined transverse Doppler and gravitational
278: redshift term gives a different relation between
279: the masses.
280: \begin{equation}
281: \gamma = e \Big({{P_{\rm b}}\over{2\pi}}\Big)^{1/3}
282: G^{2/3}c^{-2}\mwd(\mpsr+2\mwd)M^{-4/3}.
283: \end{equation}
284: General relativity predicts that gravitational
285: wave emission from binary systems removes
286: energy that results in an orbital decay.
287: The system is over-determined if one can also measure
288: the orbital period derivative $\dot P_{\rm b}$.
289: \begin{displaymath}
290: \dot P_{\rm b} =
291: - {{192 \pi G^{5/3}}\over{5 c ^5}}
292: \Big({ {2\pi}\over{P_{\rm b}}}\Big)^{5/3}(1-e^2)^{-7/2}
293: \end{displaymath}
294: \begin{equation}
295: \times \Big(1+{{73}\over {24}}e^2
296: +{{37}\over{96}} e^4\Big)\mpsr \mwd M^{-1/3}
297: \end{equation}
298: Thus, binary pulsars such as \psr can be used to
299: test the validity of the general theory of relativity.
300: The allowed range of masses for the system are shown in Figure 1.
301: Other post-Keplerian parameters such as the range and shape
302: of the Shapiro delay were not significant in the fit.
303:
304: The companion is almost certainly a white dwarf, unless
305: neutron star masses extend over a very large range.
306: The mean and standard deviation of the 7 neutron stars
307: shown in Figure 2 would place the companion of \psr
308: seven standard deviations from the mean of the others which
309: appears unlikely.
310:
311: Young pulsars often exhibit
312: significant timing noise which make timing proper motions
313: unreliable on the timescale of a few years. A formal
314: fit to the limited data yielded proper motions
315: in both right acension and declination of --12$\pm$3 milli-arc
316: seconds per year. Whether
317: the apparently 4-sigma proper motion is real or not
318: will become apparent with continued timing. For now
319: we are treating the result with some caution. Timing
320: noise has a much longer period (months to years) than
321: the orbital period of our pulsar (4.7h), and so
322: although the timing proper motion is potentially non-physical,
323: the derived orbital parameters are not subject to contamination
324: by timing noise.
325:
326: The self-consistency of the system with general relativity
327: is very pleasing. The orbital period derivative
328: is now a 4-sigma result. The relative
329: error in this term scales as the length of the
330: observing span $t^{-5/2}$, so by the
331: end of the decade it should be near 1\%.
332: \psr is therefore likely to be a very important
333: new testing ground for general relativity. The dissymetry
334: of the system tests different aspects of the
335: theory since one of the stars is not strongly
336: self-gravitating.
337: Its favourable location in the
338: Galaxy means that the measured orbital period
339: derivative is close to the intrinsic value (Ord, Bailes
340: and van Straten 2002a). Unfortunately, the pulsar
341: is young, and unlikely to be as intrinsically stable as PSR B1913+16,
342: which has a much weaker magnetic field strength.
343: Whether this is important or not for post-Keplerian orbital parameters
344: remains to be seen. In any case, it will be difficult to
345: surpass PSR B1913+16's relative errors on terms such
346: as the relativistic contribution to the orbital period
347: derivative.
348:
349: \section{Discussion}
350:
351: Large-scale simulations of binary pulsar progenitors
352: predict a large population of eccentric pulsar-white dwarf
353: binaries \cite{ts00a},
354: albeit with a short observable lifetime.
355: \psr is thought to arise from the
356: evolution of a binary in which both stars are initially
357: less than the critical mass \mcrit required to produce a supernova
358: \cite{ts00a}.
359: The initially more-massive star transfers mass to its companion
360: before becoming a white dwarf. If sufficient matter can
361: be accreted by the initially lower-mass star it will exceed \mcrit
362: and produce a pulsar. Should the system remain
363: bound, we will be left with a
364: young neutron star orbiting a white dwarf companion in
365: an eccentric orbit. \psr's mass \mpsr is therefore very important,
366: because we know that the progenitor must have been less
367: than 2 \mcrit -- \mwd. This is the first time we have an
368: upper limit to the progenitor mass of a neutron star, albeit
369: in terms of \mcrit.
370: All previous neutron star mass measurements are from
371: systems where both components were large
372: enough to form neutron stars, which makes the progenitor masses
373: far more difficult to constrain as our theoretical
374: understanding of the mass of neutron star progenitors is
375: limited.
376:
377: Radio pulsar masses cannot be easily determined.
378: Neutron stars can theoretically exist over a range of
379: masses
380: (Timmes, Woosley and Weaver 1996)
381: \nocite{tww96} that is much broader than that
382: inferred from observations of radio pulsars \nocite{wt03,
383: sttw02,dk96}(
384: Weisberg and Taylor 2003, Stairs \etal 2002, Deich and
385: Kulkarni 1996).
386: Until these measurements, the mean and standard
387: deviation of the six accurately known neutron stars
388: was just 1.37$\pm$0.04 \msun.
389: \psr's mass of 1.30$\pm$0.02 is the smallest yet
390: determined with any accuracy. It's mass is
391: two standard deviations below the mean
392: of the others as shown in Figure 2.
393:
394: \begin{figure}[here]
395: \label{fig:junk}
396: \epsscale{1.0}
397: \plotone{f2.eps}
398:
399: \caption{
400: Neutron star masses derived from relativistic binary pulsars.
401: Error bars are shown for all data, but in the case of
402: PSR B1913+16 and PSR B1534+12 they are too small to be visible.
403: Masses are taken from Deich and Kulkarni (1996),
404: Stairs {\it et al.} 2002 and Weisberg and Taylor (2003).
405: \psr\, is the first neutron star not in a neutron star-neutron star
406: binary
407: to have its mass so precisely determined.
408: On evolutionary grounds we know its progenitor was near
409: the lower end of
410: the mass distribution for pulsar progenitors.
411: The low remnant mass suggests that the neutron star
412: mass is related to that of the progenitor.
413: }
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \noindent
417: In the absence of any asymmetry in the explosion,
418: component masses and orbital parameters define the
419: progenitor system mass and runaway velocity \cite{rs86}.
420: If the explosion were symmetric, the pre-supernova star in
421: the \psr\, system would
422: have been only $M_{\rm pre}=M(1+e)-\mwd=1.7$ \msun. It seems unlikely that
423: the presupernova star could be such a small fraction
424: of its original mass $> \mcrit \sim 8-11$ \msun.
425: Thus \psr's orbital configuration is therefore a
426: strong argument in favour of asymmetric supernova kicks
427: \cite{dc87,bai89}.
428: Such kicks can misalign the spin and orbital angular
429: momentum vectors of the pulsar, allowing detectable
430: precession due to spin orbit coupling\cite{dr74,bo75}.
431: This has been observed in the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16 \cite{kra98}.
432: In \psr\, the timescale for complete precession is
433: only $\sim$ 200 yr. Its high orbital inclination
434: could lead to significant changes in our line of sight to
435: the pulsar's spin axis on the timescale of a decade or so.
436: This might explain the non-detection of the pulsar
437: in previous surveys of the region and we would
438: expect rapid evolution of the pulse profile as
439: suggested by \cite{klm+00a}.
440:
441: \psr\, is a very significant object. It
442: has already validated scintillation speed methodologies,
443: provided the first estimate of a neutron star mass
444: where we have firm constraints on the progenitor,
445: proved that mass transfer can transform a star
446: that would otherwise become a white dwarf into a
447: neutron star and extended the range of systems
448: for which general relativity provides an accurate
449: description. Its orbital parameters
450: suggest that the explosion was probably asymmetric.
451: As the errors in orbital period
452: derivative decrease, this system will test
453: new aspects of theories of relativistic gravity that
454: were impossible with the other relativistic binaries
455: due to its unique composition
456: \cite{twdw92,dt92}. Together, PSR B1913+16, PSR B1534+12
457: and PSR J1141--6545 will strongly constrain relativistic
458: theories of gravity.
459:
460: \bibliographystyle{apj00}
461: %#\bibliography{journals,psrrefs,modrefs}
462:
463: \begin{thebibliography}{}
464:
465: \bibitem[Arzoumanian 2003]{arz03}
466: Arzoumanian, Z. 2003, in {\em ASP Conf. Ser. 302: Radio Pulsars}, volume 302,
467: 69.
468:
469: \bibitem[Bailes 1989]{bai89}
470: Bailes, M. 1989, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 342}, 917--927.
471:
472: \bibitem[Barker and O'Connell 1975]{bo75}
473: Barker, B.~M. and O'Connell, R.~F. 1975, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 199}, L25.
474:
475: \bibitem[Bell and Bailes 1996]{bb96}
476: Bell, J.~F. and Bailes, M. 1996, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 456}, L33--L36.
477:
478: \bibitem[Damour and Deruelle 1986]{dd86}
479: Damour, T. and Deruelle, N. 1986, {\em Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e (Physique
480: Th\'eorique)}, {\bf 44}, 263--292.
481:
482: \bibitem[Damour and Esposito-Far\`ese 1992]{de92}
483: Damour, T. and Esposito-Far\`ese, G. 1992, {\em Classical Quantum Gravity},
484: {\bf 9}, 2093--2176.
485:
486: \bibitem[Damour and Ruffini 1974]{dr74}
487: Damour, T. and Ruffini, R. 1974, {\em CR Acad. Sci Paris}, {\bf 279}, 971--973.
488:
489: \bibitem[Damour and Taylor 1991]{dt91}
490: Damour, T. and Taylor, J.~H. 1991, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 366}, 501--511.
491:
492: \bibitem[Damour and Taylor 1992]{dt92}
493: Damour, T. and Taylor, J.~H. 1992, {\em Phys. Rev. D.}, {\bf 45}, 1840--1868.
494:
495: \bibitem[Deich and Kulkarni 1996]{dk96}
496: Deich, W. T.~S. and Kulkarni, S.~R. 1996, in {\em {C}ompact {S}tars in
497: {B}inaries: {IAU} Symposium 165}, ed.\ J. van Paradijs, E.~P.~J. van~del
498: Heuvel, and E. Kuulkers, (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 279--285.
499:
500: \bibitem[Dewey and Cordes 1987]{dc87}
501: Dewey, R.~J. and Cordes, J.~M. 1987, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 321}, 780--798.
502:
503: \bibitem[{Kaspi} {\it et~al.} 2000]{klm+00a}
504: {Kaspi}, V.~M. {\it et~al.} 2000, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 543}, 321--327.
505:
506: \bibitem[{Kramer} 1998]{kra98}
507: {Kramer}, M. 1998, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 509}, 856--860.
508:
509: \bibitem[Ord, Bailes, and van Straten 2002a]{obv02b}
510: Ord, S.~M., Bailes, M., and van Straten, W. 2002a, {\em MNRAS}, {\bf 337},
511: 409--412.
512:
513: \bibitem[Ord, Bailes, and van Straten 2002b]{obv02}
514: Ord, S.~M., Bailes, M., and van Straten, W. 2002b, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 574},
515: L75--L78.
516:
517: \bibitem[Radhakrishnan and Shukre 1986]{rs86}
518: Radhakrishnan, V. and Shukre, C.~S. 1986, {\em Ap\&SS}, {\bf 118}, 329--336.
519:
520: \bibitem[Stairs {\it et~al.} 2002]{sttw02}
521: Stairs, I.~H., Thorsett, S.~E., Taylor, J.~H., and Wolszczan, A. 2002, {\em
522: ApJ}, {\bf 581}, 501--508.
523:
524: \bibitem[{Tauris} and {Sennels} 2000]{ts00a}
525: {Tauris}, T.~M. and {Sennels}, T. 2000, {\em A\&A}, {\bf 355}, 236--244.
526:
527: \bibitem[Taylor, Fowler, and McCulloch 1979]{tfm79}
528: Taylor, J.~H., Fowler, L.~A., and McCulloch, P.~M. 1979, {\em Nature}, {\bf
529: 277}, 437.
530:
531: \bibitem[Taylor {\it et~al.} 1992]{twdw92}
532: Taylor, J.~H., Wolszczan, A., Damour, T., and Weisberg, J.~M. 1992, {\em
533: Nature}, {\bf 355}, 132--136.
534:
535: \bibitem[Thorsett and Chakrabarty 1999]{tc99}
536: Thorsett, S.~E. and Chakrabarty, D. 1999, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 512}, 288--299.
537:
538: \bibitem[Timmes, Woosley, and Weaver 1996]{tww96}
539: Timmes, F.~X., Woosley, S.~E., and Weaver, T.~A. 1996, {\em ApJ}, {\bf 457},
540: 834.
541:
542: \bibitem[van Straten {\it et~al.} 2001]{vbb+01}
543: van Straten, W., Bailes, M., Britton, M., Kulkarni, S.~R., Anderson, S.~B.,
544: Manchester, R.~N., and Sarkissian, J. 2001, {\em Nature}, {\bf 412},
545: 158--160.
546:
547: \bibitem[Weisberg and Taylor 2003]{wt03}
548: Weisberg, J. and Taylor, J.~H. 2003, in {\em ASP Conf. Ser. 302: Radio
549: Pulsars}, volume 302, 93.
550:
551: \end{thebibliography}
552:
553: \vspace{5mm}
554: \noindent
555: \bsf{Acknowledgements} \\
556:
557: \noindent
558: {\small The Parkes Observatory is part of the Australia Telescope
559: which is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation as a
560: National Facility managed by CSIRO. We thank Dick Manchester for
561: his prompt supply of archival timing data on this pulsar
562: and the multibeam collaboration for use of their equipment,
563: T. Damour for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript,
564: and the referee D. Nice for helpful suggestions.
565: M.~Bailes is an ARC Senior Research Fellow. H. Knight \&
566: A. Hotan are recipients of CSIRO studentships.
567: \\
568: }
569:
570: \begin{table}
571: \begin{center}
572: \begin{tabular}{lr}
573: \hline
574: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\bf\textsf{Table 1 Observed and derived parameters}} \\
575: \hline \\
576: Right ascension, $\alpha$ (J2000) \dotfill &
577: 11$^{\mathrm h}$41$^{\mathrm m}$07\fs022(6) \\
578: Declination, $\delta$ (J2000) \dotfill &
579: -65\degr45\arcmin19\farcs089(9) \\
580: Pulse period, $P$ (ms) \dotfill & 393.8978340370(2) \\
581: Reference epoch (MJD) \dotfill & 51369.8525 \\
582: Dispersion Measure cm$^3$ pc$^{-1}$ \dotfill & 116.048(2)\\
583: Period derivative, $\dot{P}$ (10$^{-15}$) \dotfill & 4.294593(3) \\
584: Orbital period, $P_{\rm b}$ (days) \dotfill & 0.1976509587(3) \\
585: Projected semi-major axis $x$ (s) \dotfill & 1.85894(1) \\
586: Orbital eccentricity, $e$ \dotfill & 0.171876(2) \\
587: Epoch of periastron, $T_{0}$ (MJD) \dotfill & 51369.854553(1) \\
588: Longitude of periastron, $\omega$ (\degr) \dotfill & 42.457(2) \\
589: Number of arrival times \dotfill & 7180\\
590: RMS Residual ($\mu$s) \dotfill & 114\\
591: Damour-Deruelle PK parameters\\
592: $\gamma$ (s) \dotfill & 0.00072(3)\\
593: $\dot \omega$ (\degr yr$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 5.3084(9) \\
594: $\dot P_{\rm b} (10^{-12})$ \dotfill & --0.43(10) \\
595:
596: Damour-Deruelle GR fit\\
597:
598: Companion mass, $\mwd$ (M$_{\odot})$ \dotfill & 0.986(20) \\
599: Pulsar mass, $\mpsr$ (M$_{\odot})$ \dotfill & 1.30(2) \\
600: Sum of masses, $M$ (M$_{\odot})$ \dotfill & 2.2883(5)\\
601: Derived Parameters\\
602: Orbital inclination, $i$ (\degr) \dotfill & $i>75$ \\
603:
604: \end{tabular} \\
605:
606: \vspace{5mm}
607: \parbox{88mm}{\sffamily
608: Best-fit physical parameters and their formal 1$\sigma$
609: errors were derived from arrival time data by minimizing an objective
610: function, as implemented in TEMPO
611: (http://pulsar.princeton.edu/tempo). The timing model used is
612: TEMPO's DD relativistic binary model \cite{dd86} which
613: allows us to fit for $\dot \omega$, $\dot P_{\rm b}$ and
614: $\gamma$ separately.
615: To derive the best estimate of the companion and pulsar
616: masses, a fit to only $M$ and \mwd was performed using TEMPO's
617: DDGR model. This model assumes general relativity is correct.
618: Parenthesized numbers represent
619: the 1-$\sigma$ uncertainty in the last digits quoted, and epochs are specified using
620: the Modified Julian Day (MJD).
621: }
622: \end{center}
623: \end{table}
624:
625: \end{document}
626:
627:
628:
629:
630: