1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % Define a switch for submission mode
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: \newif\ifsubmode
6: %\submodefalse
7: \submodetrue
8:
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: % Preamble
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12:
13: \ifsubmode
14: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
15: %\received{}
16: %\revised{}
17: %\accepted{July}
18: \citestyle{aa}
19:
20: \else
21: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{emulateapj}
22: \font\sevenrm=cmr7
23: \def\kmm{{\sevenrm KMM}~}
24: \citestyle{aa}
25: \fi
26:
27: \usepackage{graphicx}
28: %\usepackage{doublespace}
29:
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: % User defined macros
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33:
34: \newcommand{\etal}{{et al.~}}
35: \newcommand{\lta}{\lesssim}
36: \newcommand{\gta}{\gtrsim}
37: \newcommand{\kms}{\,\rm km\,s^{-1}}
38:
39: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{
40: \def\@captype{figure}
41: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
42: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
43:
44: \shorttitle{The $z \sim 4$ Lyman Break Galaxies: Colors and Theoretical Predictions}
45: \shortauthors{Idzi et al.}
46:
47: %\received{2003 May 24}
48: \received{2003 May 24}
49:
50: \begin{document}
51:
52: \title{The $z \sim 4$ Lyman Break Galaxies: Colors and Theoretical Predictions\altaffilmark{5,6}}
53:
54: \author{
55: Rafal Idzi\altaffilmark{2},
56: Rachel Somerville\altaffilmark{1},
57: Casey Papovich\altaffilmark{4},
58: Henry C. Ferguson\altaffilmark{1,2},
59: Mauro Giavalisco\altaffilmark{1},
60: Claudia Kretchmer\altaffilmark{2},
61: Jennifer Lotz\altaffilmark{3}
62: }
63:
64: \altaffiltext{1}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
65: Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; somerville@stsci.edu, ferguson@stsci.edu, mauro@stsci.edu}
66:
67: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins
68: University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218; idzi@stsci.edu, claudia@pha.jhu.edu}
69:
70: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University
71: of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; jlotz@scipp.ucsc.edu}
72:
73: \altaffiltext{4}{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North
74: Charry Avenue, Tuscon, AZ 85721; papovich@as.arizona.edu}
75:
76: \altaffiltext{5}{Based on observations taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble
77: Space Telescope, which is operated by the Association of Universities
78: for Research in Astronomy, Inc.\ (AURA) under NASA contract
79: NAS5--26555}
80:
81: \altaffiltext{6}{Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory,
82: Chile (ESO Programmes 168.A-0485, 64.0-0643, 66.A-0572, 68.A-0544)}
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85: We investigate several fundamental properties of $z \sim 4$ Lyman-break
86: galaxies by comparing observations with the predictions of a
87: semi-analytic model based on the Cold Dark Matter theory of
88: hierarchical structure formation. We use a sample of $B_{435}$-dropouts
89: from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, and complement the ACS
90: optical $B_{435}$, $V_{606}$, $i_{775}$, and $z_{850}$ data with the
91: VLT ISAAC $J$, $H$, and $K_{s}$ observations. We extract $B_{435}$-dropouts
92: from our semi-analytic mock catalog using the same color criteria and magnitude limits
93: that were applied to the observed sample. We find that the $i_{775} - K_{s}$
94: colors of the model-derived and observed $B_{435}$-dropouts are in good agreement.
95: However, we find that the $i_{775}-z_{850}$ colors differ significantly,
96: indicating perhaps that either too little dust or an incorrect extinction curve have been used.
97: Motivated by the reasonably good agreement between the model and observed data
98: we present predictions for the stellar masses, star formation rates, and ages for the $z \sim 4$
99: Lyman-break sample. We find that according to our model the color selection criteria used to
100: select our $z \sim 4$ sample surveys $67 \%$ of all galaxies at this epoch down to $z_{850} < 26.5$.
101: We find that our model predicts a $\sim 40 \%$ mass build-up between the $z \sim 4$ and $z \sim 3$
102: epochs for the UV rest-frame $L^{*}$ galaxies. Furthermore, according to our model, at least $50 \%$
103: of the total stellar mass resides in relatively massive UV-faint objects that fall below our observational
104: detection limit.
105: \end{abstract}
106: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: fundamental parameters --- galaxies: high-redshift --- galaxies: photometry --- cosmology: observations --- cosmology: theory}
107:
108: \section{Introduction}
109: The "Lyman-break'' color selection technique has been shown to be a
110: highly effective means of selecting galaxies at high redshift $z \gta 2$ \citep{SAG1999,MFD1996}.
111: Fairly large samples of Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) in the redshift
112: range $2 \lta z \lta 3.5$ have been compiled, and the characteristics
113: of these objects have been studied with much vigor over the past
114: several years. Optical and NIR photometric colors have been used to
115: ascertain various attributes of these high-redshift objects. For
116: example, colors spanning the rest-frame Balmer break ($\lambda \sim
117: 4000$ \AA) have been used to constrain the range of possible stellar
118: ages and masses of these galaxies through application of maximum-likelihood
119: techniques to synthesized stellar population models \citep{PDF2001,SSA2001}.
120:
121: As well, many researchers have compared theoretical models of galaxy
122: evolution with various aspects of the observations \citep{WSB2001,BCF1998}.
123: \citet[][hereafter SPF2001]{SPF2001} have used semi-analytic models to
124: perform detailed comparative studies on the $z \sim 3$ sample. In SPF2001
125: it was shown that the luminosity function and rest-frame UV and UV-optical colors of
126: $z \sim 3$ LBGs could be reproduced well by the models, implying that
127: the ages and dust contents of the model galaxies were consistent with
128: the observations.
129:
130: In this letter, we compare the colors of observed $B_{435}$-dropouts, selected from ACS imaging
131: from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and supplemented with
132: deep NIR ($JHK_{s}$) data from ISAAC on the VLT, with the colors of model-derived $B_{435}$-dropouts.
133: We then present model predictions for physical properties of these objects, such as stellar masses,
134: ages, and star formation rates. We also investigate selection effects on the stellar mass content
135: for the redshift that we sample, and we look at the stellar mass build-up between the $z \sim 4$
136: and $z \sim 3$ epochs.
137:
138: All quoted magnitudes throughout the letter are in the AB magnitude system \citep{O1974}.
139:
140: \section{Observations and Measurements}\label{observations}
141:
142: We use three epochs of HST ACS observations of the Chandra Deep Field
143: South (CDF-S) obtained as part of the GOODS program. The data consist
144: of image mosaics in all four ACS bands $B_{435}$, $V_{606}$,
145: $i_{775}$, and $z_{850}$ (the ACS F435W, F606W, F775W, F850LP filters,
146: respectively) spanning wavelength range of $0.4$ to 1 $\micron$, and
147: covering approximately a field of view of $10 \arcmin$ x $16 \arcmin$.
148: The specifics of data acquisition and reduction, as well as object detection and
149: photometry can be found in \citet{G2003a}.
150:
151: We supplement our ACS data set with the VLT ISAAC near-infrared imaging.
152: The NIR data consists of the J, H, and $K_{s}$ bands that extend our wavelength coverage
153: out to $\lambda \sim 4400$ \AA (rest-frame $z \sim 4$). We combine the ACS and ISAAC data
154: using a method that optimally matches the relative photometry between these bands
155: \citep{PapPhD,P2003}.
156:
157: \section{Theoretical Model}\label{theoretical model}
158:
159: We make use of a semi-analytic model, based on the hierarchical
160: structure formation paradigm in a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology
161: ($\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, $\Omega_{m} = 0.3$, $\rm h = H_{0}/100$
162: $\kms$$\rm Mpc^{-1} = 0.7$). The model treats the formation of structure
163: via a hierarchical `merger tree', and includes a treatment of gas
164: cooling, star formation, supernova feedback and chemical enrichment,
165: galaxy mergers, stellar populations and dust (see \citet{SP1999} and
166: SPF2001 for details). We follow halo merger histories down to a
167: circular velocity of $\rm V_c =30 \kms$, as gas collapse and star
168: formation in smaller halos is assumed to be suppressed by the presence
169: of a photoionizing background \citep[see][and references
170: therein]{S2002}. We use the multi-metallicity stellar SEDs from the
171: STARDUST models \citep{DGS1999}, with a Kennicutt IMF. Dust extinction
172: is modeled in a similar manner as in SPF2001. We use this model to
173: produce a `mock-GOODS' catalog with the same geometry, sky area,
174: filter passbands, etc. as the real GOODS.
175:
176: \section{Galaxy Sample}\label{galaxy sample}
177:
178: The $B_{435}$-dropout sample was chosen using the color selection criteria described in detail by \citet{G2003b}.
179: The sample was refined by applying detection limits at (S/N)$_{z,i} > 5$ for the ACS data set, and another one at
180: (S/N)$_{K_{s}} > 1$ for the matched NIR set. These signal-to-noise restrictions limited our sample
181: to galaxies with $z_{850} < 26.5$, which helped curtail the presence of spurious detections. The relatively faint
182: $K_{s}$ cut-off was necessitated by the desire for a large enough sample for our study and did not significantly
183: affect our conclusions. After further visual inspection, we chose 136 color-selected galaxies for analysis.
184:
185: Using the same color selection criteria that were applied to the observed sample we produced a model-derived
186: $B_{435}$-dropout sample. We then applied a magnitude cut-off of $z < 26.5$ in order to comply with the
187: observational detection limit. Before applying the color selection criteria we incorporated simulated observational scatter
188: into our model-derived photometric catalogs. The observational scatter was drawn from a Gaussian distribution with
189: the typical signal-to-noise values found in the observed CDF-S data set.
190:
191: Due to the dearth of spectroscopic data, empirical Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate
192: the redshift distribution of the observed $B_{435}$-dropout sample. These simulations
193: were based on artificial LBGs distributed over a wide redshift range ($2.5 < z < 8$) with assumed distribution
194: functions of UV luminosity, SED, morphology, and size, adjusted to match the colors of observed $B_{435}$-dropouts
195: observed at $z \sim 4$. Reader is urged to see \citet{G2003b} for a detailed discussion on these simulations.
196: The redshift distribution of the simulated color-selected sample was found to have a mean value of $z \sim 3.78$ with
197: a standard deviation of $\pm 0.34$.
198:
199: One of the interesting tests that we can perform is to test for the incompleteness of our color-selected sample.
200: According to the Monte Carlo simulations, $73 \%$ of all the simulated $B_{435}$-dropout galaxies down to $z_{850} < 26.5$
201: and in the interval $3.44 < z < 4.12$ are recovered using our color selection criteria. When we apply the color criteria to
202: our model, we select $67 \%$ of all model galaxies in the same $3.44 < z < 4.12$ redshift range, down to the same
203: limiting magnitude of $z_{850} < 26.5$. This implies that the simulations performed by \citet{G2003b} and the
204: semi-analytic model show concordant incompleteness estimates with respect to the $B_{435}$-dropout selection
205: technique in the above redshift range and down to our detection limit.
206:
207: \section{Galaxy Properties}\label{galaxy properties}
208:
209: The $i_{775} - K_{s}$ vs. $i_{775} - z_{850}$ (1550 - 4400 vs. 1550 - 1700 \AA, rest-frame $z \sim 4$)
210: colors for the observed and model-derived $B_{435}$-dropout samples are presented in Figures 1a and 1b,
211: respectively. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test reveals a $19 \%$ likelihood that the $i_{775} - K_{s}$ colors are
212: drawn from the same underlying distribution for the two $B_{435}$-dropout samples. A probability of
213: 2 X $10^{-8}$ is obtained for the corresponding $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors. This indicates a relatively good
214: agreement in the $i_{775} - K_{s}$ color distribution between the two samples, but a poor correlation in the
215: $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors.
216:
217: The $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors probe the slope of the UV continuum, which is believed to be
218: primarily an indicator of internal dust content in young stellar populations \citep[e.g.][]{MHC1999}.
219: In our model we used dust normalized against the $z = 0$ data and a Galactic extinction curve.
220: The apparent disparity could be fixed by employing a different extinction curve \citep{C1997},
221: or including the expected dependence of the extinction on the age of the stellar populaton \citep{CF2000}.
222:
223: Aside from the photometric analysis, we compared the luminosity function from our model with the one
224: for G-dropouts from \citet{SAG1999} and B-dropouts from HDF-N to ensure proper number counts.
225: We found good agreement, which is not surprising since our model is very similar to the one that was used
226: (and optimized) in SPF2001. In fact, the reader is urged to refer to SPF2001 for a detailed discussion on this
227: topic.
228:
229: Several researchers \citep[e.g.][]{PDF2001,SSA2001} have used simple
230: parameterized star formation histories and stellar population
231: synthesis models to estimate physical properties of LBG's at $z \sim 3$
232: using the optical-NIR photometry as a constraint on the star formation
233: history. Here, as we have shown that our model reproduces (modulo dust)
234: the observed color distribution for objects selected via their $B_{435} - V_{606}$
235: and $V_{606} - i_{775}$ colors and corresponding magnitude limits,
236: we argue on similar grounds that our model should reproduce the statistical distribution
237: of underlying stellar ages and masses of the observed $B_{435}$-dropout population.
238: Thus we can use our models to obtain estimates for some of these quantities.
239:
240: In Figure 2 we show the stellar masses of our color-selected model galaxies.
241: We note that the stellar masses range from $10^{8}$ to $10^{10}$ $\rm h^{-2}$
242: $\rm M_{\sun}$, which is roughly two orders of magnitude less than the stellar masses of
243: the present day $L_{*}$ spirals and ellipticals --- this indicates that, as with the $z \sim 3$ population,
244: the $z \sim 4$ Lyman-break galaxies are not the fully assembled progenitors of the present-day $L
245: > L_{*}$ galaxies \citep{GSM96,S96a}, and that several generations of merging events must take
246: place between $z \sim4 $ and the present epoch. The median mass of $\rm Log[M_{star}] \sim 9.26$
247: ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$) is 0.5 dex less than for the $z \sim 3$ galaxies studied
248: in SPF2001. This implies a stellar mass build-up between the two epochs.
249: To further explore the last point we have looked at the mean stellar masses of all $L^{*}$
250: galaxies measured in rest-frame UV and predicted by our model at $z \sim 3$ and $z \sim 4$.
251: We find that at $z \sim 3$, with $m_{*} = 24.358$ (UV rest-frame), we get a mean value of
252: $\rm Log[M_{star}] = 9.74$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$) in a $m_{*} \pm 0.5$ magnitude interval,
253: and at $z \sim 4$, with $m_{*} = 24.998$ (UV rest-frame), we get a mean value of
254: $\rm Log[M_{star}] = 9.58$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$), again in a $m_{*} \pm 0.5$ magnitude interval.
255: This corresponds to a mass build-up of approximately $\sim 40 \%$. This type of mass build-up
256: between $z \sim 4$ and $z \sim 3$ is similar to that inferred from the \citet{P2003}
257: comparison of volume-averaged SEDs of observed Lyman-break galaxies.
258:
259: Our model also provides us with the star formation rates (SFR) and ages of our
260: color-selected model galaxies. Our model results tell us that the values of these two quantities for the
261: $z \sim 4$ sample are very similar to the ones found for the $z \sim 3$ sample studied by SPF2001.
262: We observe a branch of actively star-forming galaxies, and a broader branch of
263: galaxies with lower SFR, corresponding to bursting and fading galaxies. The star formation rates for
264: the brightest galaxies in the model approach 100 $\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm yr^{-1}$, similar to what has
265: been found for $z \sim 3$ Lyman-break galaxies studied by SPF2001.
266:
267: We have also looked at the distribution of \emph{stellar-mass-weighted} mean
268: stellar ages. We found that the distribution is very broad and skewed toward ages of
269: less than 300 Myr, with a median age of 200 Myr, and a peak at about
270: 100 Myr. There is, however, a tail of objects with older stellar populations, reaching a mean
271: age of $\sim 1$ Gyr --- close to the age of the universe at that redshift in our adopted cosmology
272: ($\sim 1.5$ Gyr).
273:
274: Drawing on the stellar mass distribution results (Figure 2) we plot in Figure 3 the mass distribution
275: of all (i.e. not just color-selected) galaxies from our mock catalog, limited to galaxies with
276: $\rm Log[M_{star}] > 9.26$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$) (the median value from Figure 2)
277: and spanning the redshift range of $3.44 < z < 4.12$. As was mentioned in \S\ref{galaxy sample}, we select
278: $67 \%$ of model galaxies in this redshift range with our color selection criteria, down to a limiting magnitude of
279: $z_{850} < 26.5$. This corresponds to $62 \%$ of the total stellar mass available in that redshift range, down
280: to that magnitude limit. Hence, with our color criteria, we 'observe' the majority of the stellar mass that resides in galaxies
281: brighter than $z_{850} < 26.5$ and spanning $3.44 < z < 4.12$. Figure 2 indicates that $50 \%$ of our color-selected
282: objects lie above $\rm Log[M_{star}] > 9.26$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$), we find though that only $50 \%$ of all model
283: galaxies more massive than $\rm Log[M_{star}] > 9.26$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$) are brighter than $z_{850} < 26.5$.
284: So for model-derived objects residing in $3.44 < z < 4.12$ we only sample $50 \%$ of the available stellar mass down to
285: $z_{850} < 26.5$. The rest of the stellar mass resides in relatively massive UV-faint galaxies. The color selection
286: incompleteness down to $z_{850} < 26.5$ and the mass contained in the UV-faint objects with magnitudes $z_{850} > 26.5$
287: are two effects that conspire to severely limit the amount of mass selected with optical surveys \citep{F2003}.
288: Given how well our model predicts the observed colors (modulo dust), number counts, and other properties, this points to
289: a substantial deficit in optically-selected galaxies, and by extension, the total stellar mass. Since our model catalog was limited
290: to galaxies with $z_{850} < 28.0$ values, the 'unseen' mass fraction estimate should be taken as a lower limit.
291:
292: \section{Summary and Conclusions}\label{summary}
293:
294: We performed a comparative analysis of the color-selected $B_{435}$-dropout samples taken from GOODS
295: observations and a variant of a $\Lambda$CDM-based semi-analytic model. We found that the color
296: selection technique used to obtain the $B_{435}$-dropout sample does a relatively good job in selecting a
297: complete census of galaxies spanning $z \sim 3.78 \pm 0.34$ and down to $z_{850} < 26.5$. The color
298: selection incompleteness limits are roughly the same when applied to our model and the empirical Monte Carlo
299: simulations preformed by \citet{G2003b}. We select $67 \%$ of all galaxies and $62 \%$ of stellar mass in that redshift range,
300: down to $z_{850} < 26.5$. This lends further credence to applicability of the $B_{435}$-dropout color selection
301: technique outlined in \citet{G2003b}, which was designed based on simpler, more empirical models of galaxy SEDs at
302: this epoch, and has not, as yet, been extensively verified with spectroscopic data.
303:
304: We found a relatively good agreement between the model-derived and observed CDF-S $B_{435}$-dropout
305: galaxy $i_{775} - K_{s}$ colors. The $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors showed much less agreement, however, we attribute
306: the discrepancy to potentially inadequate dust recipe employed in the model. In general, we found that the stellar age,
307: mass, and the star formation properties of the $z \sim 4$ sample were similar to the $z \sim 3$ sample studied by
308: SPF2001. We found a model-derived $\sim 40 \%$ stellar mass build-up for the UV rest-frame $L^{*}$ galaxies
309: between the two epochs. In addition we found that if we look at all galaxies predicted by our model, spanning
310: $3.44 < z < 4.12$ redshift range, then at least $50 \%$ of the stellar mass contained in objects with
311: $\rm Log[M_{star}] > 9.26$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$) is missed due to the $z_{850} < 26.5$ observational limit.
312: If our model is correct, and it does show reasonable agreement with respect to colors (modulo dust), number counts,
313: and other physical quantities, this result has significant implications for the completeness of the optically-selected
314: surveys at this epoch.
315:
316: \acknowledgments
317:
318: Support for this work was provided by NASA through grant GO09583.01-96A from the
319: Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities
320: for Research in Astronomy, Inc.\ (AURA), under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
321:
322: Support for this work, part of the {\it Space Infrared Telescope
323: Facility (SIRTF)} Legacy Science Program, was provided by NASA through
324: Contract Number 1224666 issued by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
325: California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.
326:
327: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
328: %\bibliography{apjmnemonic,bib}
329:
330: \begin{thebibliography}{}
331:
332: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Baugh} et~al.}{{Baugh} et~al.}{1998}]{BCF1998}
333: {Baugh}, C.~M., {Cole}, S., {Frenk}, C.~S., \& {Lacey}, C.~G. 1998, ApJ, 498, 504
334:
335: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Calzetti}}{{Calzetti}}{1997}]{C1997}
336: {Calzetti}, D. 1997, AJ, 113, 162
337:
338: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Charlot} \& {Fall}}{{Charlot} \& {Fall}}{2000}]{CF2000}
339: {Charlot}, S., {Fall}, S.~M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718C
340:
341: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Devriendt}, {Guiderdoni}, \& {Sadat}}{{Devriendt}, {Guiderdoni}, \&
342: {Sadat}}{1999}]{DGS1999}
343: {Devriendt}, J.~E.~G., {Guiderdoni}, B., \& {Sadat}, R. 1999, A\&A, 350, 381D
344:
345: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Franx et~al.}}{{Franx} et~al.}{2003}]{F2003}
346: {Franx}, M. et~al. 2003, ApJ, 587, L79
347:
348: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Giavalisco et~al.}}{{Giavalisco} et~al.}{2003a}]{G2003a}
349: {Giavalisco}, M. et~al. 2003a, this ApJL issue
350:
351: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Giavalisco et~al.}}{{Giavalisco} et~al.}{2003b}]{G2003b}
352: {Giavalisco}, M. et~al. 2003b, this ApJL issue
353:
354: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Giavalisco}, {Steidel}, \& {Macchetto}}{{Giavalisco}, {Steidel}, \&
355: {Macchetto}}{1996}]{GSM96}
356: {Giavalisco}, M., {Steidel}, C., \& {Macchetto}, D. 1996, ApJ, 470, 189
357:
358: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Madau} et~al.}{{Madau} et~al.}{1996}]{MFD1996}
359: {Madau}, P., {Ferguson}, H., {Dickinson}, M., {Giavalisco}, M., {Steidel}, C., \& {Fruchter}, A. 1996,
360: MNRAS, 283, 1388
361:
362: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Meurer}, {Heckman}, \& {Calzetti}}{{Meurer}, {Heckman},
363: \& {Calzetti}}{1999}]{MHC1999}
364: {Meurer}, G., {Heckman}, T., \& {Calzetti}, D. 1999, ApJ, 521, 64
365:
366: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Oke}}{{Oke}}{1974}]{O1974}
367: {Oke}, J.~B. 1974, ApJS, 27, 21
368:
369: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Papovich} et~al.}{{Papovich} et~al.}{2003}]{P2003}
370: {Papovich}, C. et~al. 2003, this ApJL issue
371:
372: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Papovich}}{{Papovich}}{2002}]{PapPhD}
373: {Papovich}, C. 2002, Ph. D. thesis, The Johns Hopkins University
374:
375: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Papovich}, {Dickinson}, \& {Ferguson}}{{Papovich}, {Dickinson}, \&
376: {Ferguson}}{2001}]{PDF2001}
377: {Papovich}, C., {Dickinson}, M., \& {Ferguson}, H.~C. 2001, ApJ, 559, 620
378:
379: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Shapley} et~al.}{{Shapley} et~al.}{2001}]{SSA2001}
380: {Shapley}, A.~E., {Steidel}. C.~C., {Adelberger}, K. L., {Dickinson}, M.,
381: {Giavalisco}, M., \& {Pettini}, M. 2001, ApJ, 562, 95
382:
383: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Somerville}}{{Somerville}}{2002}]{S2002}
384: {Somerville}, R.~S. 2002, ApJ, 572, L23
385:
386: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Somerville}, {Primack}, \& {Faber}}{{Somerville}, {Primack}, \&
387: {Faber}}{2001}]{SPF2001}
388: {Somerville}, R.~S., {Primack}, J.~R., \& {Faber} 2001, ApJ, 310, 1087
389:
390: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Somerville} \& {Primack}}{{Somerville} \&
391: {Primack}}{1999}]{SP1999}
392: {Somerville}, R.~S., \& {Primack}, J.~R. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1087
393:
394: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Steidel} et~al.}{{Steidel} et~al}{1999}]{SAG1999}
395: {Steidel}, C., {Adelberger}, K.~A., {Giavalisco}, M., {Dickinson}, M., \& {Pettini}, M. 1999,
396: ApJ, 519, 1
397:
398: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Steidel} et~al.}{{Steidel} et~al.}{1996a}]{S96a}
399: {Steidel}, C., {Giavalisco}, M., {Dickinson}, M., \& {Adelberger}, K. 1996a, AJ, 112, 352
400:
401: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Wechsler} et~al}{{Wechsler} et~al.}{2001}]{WSB2001}
402: {Wechsler}, R.~H., {Somerville}, S.~S., {Bullock}, J.~S., {Kolatt}, T.~S., {Primack}, J.~R.,
403: {Blumenthal}, G.~R., \& {Dekel}, A. 2001, ApJ, 554, 85
404:
405: \end{thebibliography}
406:
407: \clearpage
408:
409: \begin{figure*}
410: \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f1a}}
411: \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f1b}}
412: \figcaption{The $i_{775} - K_{s}$ versus $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors of the $z \sim 4$ color-selected galaxies.
413: Panel (a) shows the 136 observed $B_{435}$-dropout galaxies {\it filled-diamond} from the CDF-S. Panel (b)
414: shows a Hess diagram of the `Collisional-Starburst' model galaxies with artificial observational scatter folded
415: in, and selected with the same color criteria and magnitude
416: limits that were applied to the observed sample. Contours have been superimposed to help
417: guide the eye; they represent the $30^{th}$, $50^{th}$, $70^{th}$, and $90^{th}$ percentiles. In addition,
418: histograms are included for both the model ({\it gray solid-line}) and observed ({\it black dash-line}) galaxy colors.
419: This figure illustrates the relative agreement in the $i_{775} -K_{s}$ color distributions for the model-derived and
420: observed $B_{435}$-dropout galaxies, while at the same time illustrating an appreciable mismatch in the
421: $i_{775} - z_{850}$ colors.\label{fig1}}
422: \end{figure*}
423: \clearpage
424:
425: \begin{inlinefigure}
426: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f2}}
427: \figcaption{The stellar masses of the color-selected model galaxies. The {\it filled-diamond} symbols show stellar
428: masses of the individual color-selected model galaxies vs. their corresponding $z_{850}$ magnitudes.
429: The histogram shows the projected distributions for the same color-selected model galaxies
430: with an imposed $z_{850} < 26.5$ magnitude limit (shown as a {\it gray dash-line}). The predicted masses are
431: two magnitudes lower than the stellar masses of the present day $L_{*}$ spirals and ellipticals.\label{fig2}}
432: \end{inlinefigure}
433: \clearpage
434:
435: \begin{inlinefigure}
436: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f3}}
437: \figcaption{This figure illustrates the stellar mass distribution of all model-derived galaxies spanning the redshift
438: range of $3.44 < z < 4.12$ and with $\rm Log[M_{star}] > 9.26$ ($\rm M_{\sun}$ $\rm h^{-2}$)
439: (the median value from Figure 2). Galaxies were binned into 0.25 magnitude intervals and weighted by their
440: corresponding stellar mass. A {\it gray dash-line} is included to delineate our observational magnitude limit. This
441: figure shows the amount of model-predicted mass potentially missed by the current optical surveys.\label{fig2}}
442: \end{inlinefigure}
443:
444: \end{document}
445:
446:
447: