1: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,referee]{../apj/aastex502/aastex}

3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: %\usepackage{emulateapj,pstricks,apjfonts}

5: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,epsf]{article}

6: \def\alwaysmath#1{\ifmmode{#1}\else{$#1$}\fi}

7: \def\msun{\alwaysmath{{M}_{\odot}}}

8: \def\teff{\alwaysmath{T_{\rm eff}}}

9: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

10: \def\etal{{et al.~}}

11: \def\kelvin{{\rm \, K}}

12: \def\pula{PSR~J1911$-$5958A~}

13: \def\compula{COM~J1911$-$5958A~}

14: \def\kms{\alwaysmath{{{\rm \,km\,sec^{-1}}}}}

15: \def\ersa{\alwaysmath{{\rm \, erg sec^{-1}/\AA}}}

16: \def\ers{\alwaysmath{{\rm \, erg\,sec^{-1}}}}

17: \newcommand\HST{{\sl HST}}

18: \newcommand\hst{{\sl HST}}

19: %\newcommand\ROSAT{{\sl ROSAT}}

20: \newcommand\CHANDRA{{\sl CHANDRA~}}

21: \newcommand\SYNPHOT{{\sl SYNPHOT~}}

22: \newcommand\PC{{\sl PC~}}

23: %\newcommand\WFPC2{{\sl WFPC2}}

24: %\newcommand\FOC{{\sl FOC}}

25: %\newcommand\STIS{{\sl STIS}}

26: %\newcommand\ROMAFOT{{\sl ROMAFOT}}

27: %\newcommand\METRIC{{\sl METRIC}}

28: %\newcommand\IRAF{{\sl IRAF}}

29: %\newcommand\ngc[1]{NGC\,#1}

30: %\setlength{\voffset}{-1.5truecm}

31: \newcommand{\gras}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}

32: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}

33: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}

34: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}

35: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}

36: \def\lapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}

37: \def\gapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{>}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}

38: 

39: \slugcomment{In press in the ApJ Letters}

40: 

41: %\shorttitle{Companion to binary MSP in NGC6752} 

42: %\shortauthors{F.R. Ferraro et al.}

43: 

44: \begin{document}

45: 

46: 

47: \title{The Helium White Dwarf orbiting the Millisecond

48: Pulsar in the halo of the Globular Cluster NGC6752

49: \footnote{Based on

50: observations collected by using the Very Large Telescope,

51: at the European Southern Observatory, Cerro Paranal, Chile, 

52: within the observing programme 71.D-0232.}}

53: 

54: \author{Francesco R. Ferraro\altaffilmark{2},

55: Andrea Possenti\altaffilmark{3,4},

56: Elena Sabbi\altaffilmark{2},  

57: Nichi D'Amico\altaffilmark{3,5}}

58: \medskip

59: 

60: \affil{\altaffilmark{2}{Dipartimento di Astronomia Universit\`a 

61: di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy,

62: ferraro@bo.astro.it}} 

63: \affil{\altaffilmark{3}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari,

64: Loc. Poggio dei Pini, Strada 54, I--09012 Capoterra, Italy}}

65: \affil{\altaffilmark{4}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 

66: via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy}}

67: \affil{\altaffilmark{5}{Dipartimento di Fisica Universit\`a di Cagliari,

68: Cittadella Universitaria, I-09042 Monserrato, Italy}}

69: 

70: \begin{abstract}

71: We have used deep high-resolution multiband images taken at the ESO

72: {\it Very Large Telescope} to identify the optical binary companion to

73: the millisecond pulsar (\pula$\!\!$)  located in the halo of the

74: Galactic Globular Cluster NGC6752. The object turns out to be a blue

75: star whose position in the Color Magnitude Diagram is consistent with

76: the cooling sequence of a low mass ($M\sim 0.17-0.20M_{\odot}$), low

77: metallicity Helium white dwarf (He-WD) at the cluster distance.  This

78: is the second He-WD which has been found to orbit a millisecond

79: pulsar in GGCs.  Curiously both objects have been found to lie on the

80: same mass He-WD cooling sequence.  The anomalous position of \pula

81: with respect to the globular cluster center ($\sim 6\arcmin$)

82: suggested that this system has recently ($\lapp 1$ Gyr) been ejected

83: from the cluster core as the result of a strong dynamical

84: interaction. The data presented here allows to constrain the cooling

85: age of the companion within a fairly narrow range ($\sim 1.2-2.8 $

86: Gyr), therefore suggesting that such dynamical encounter must have acted

87: on an already recycled millisecond pulsar.

88: \end{abstract}

89:  

90: \keywords{ Globular clusters: individual (NGC6752); stars: evolution

91: -- pulsars: individual (PSR J1911$-$5958A) -- binaries: close.}

92:  

93: \section{Introduction} 

94: \label{sec:intro}

95: 

96: \pula has been discovered on 1999 October 17 during a search for

97: Millisecond Pulsar (MSPs) in Galactic Globular Clusters (GGCs) in

98: progress at the Parkes Radiotelescope \citep{damico01}.  It is a

99: binary millisecond pulsar with a spin period of 3.26 ms, an orbital

100: period of 0.84 days and very low eccentricity ($e<10^{-5}$).  Precise

101: celestial coordinates ($RA= 19^{\rm h}\, 11^{\rm m}\, 42\fs756$, $

102: DEC=-59\arcdeg\, 58\arcmin\, 26\farcs91$) have been recently obtained

103: for this source from pulsar timing observations \citep{damico02}.

104: This position is far away ($\sim 6\arcmin$) from the cluster optical

105: center: indeed \pula is the more off-centered pulsar among the sample

106: of 44 MSPs whose position in the respective cluster is known, and it

107: suggests that this object might be the result of strong interactions

108: occurred in the cluster core.

109: 

110: \citet{colpi02} explored a number of possibilities for the peculiar

111: location of\\ \pula$\!\!$: a careful analysis led to discard the

112: hypothesis of a primordial binary (born either in the halo or in the

113: core of the cluster) and to reject also the possibility of a 3-body

114: scattering or exchange event off core stars. Hence they conjectured

115: that a more massive target \citep[either a binary

116: or a single intermediate-mass black hole, see

117: also][]{colpi03a,colpi03b} could have provided the necessary thrust to

118: propel \pula into its current halo orbit at an acceptable event rate.

119: 

120: Moreover, beside \pula$\!\!$, NGC6752 hosts also the second most

121: displaced MSP ever seen in a globular (PSR J1911$-$6000C) and at least

122: two (out the three) MSPs located in the cluster center \citep[PSR-B

123: and PSR-E, see Figure 2 in][]{ferraro03} experience strong

124: acceleration, implying an unusually high central mass to light ratio

125: $(M/L\gsim 6)$ \citep{damico02,ferraro03}. \citet{ferraro03} showed

126: that NGC6752 is a dynamically evolved cluster probably undergoing a

127: post-core-collapse bounce and investigated scenarios for

128: simultaneously explaining both the anomalous acceleration of PSR-B and

129: PSR-E and the ejection of \pula and PSR J1911$-$6000C, concluding that

130: the existence of a binary black hole of intermediate mass

131: \citep{colpi02} could be a viable possibility.

132: 

133: Optical detection of the companion to a millisecond pulsar in a

134: globular cluster proved particularly helpful in assessing the origin

135: and the evolution of the binary, besides supporting its cluster

136: membership \citep[see, e.g.,][]{edmonds01,ferraro01a,edmonds02}.

137: In fact, unlike the systems in the galactic field, the age,

138: metallicity, extinction, distance and hence intrinsic luminosity and

139: radius can be estimated from the parent cluster parameters. Hence, we

140: undertook a systematic program \citep{ferraro01a,ferraro01b}

141: devoted to the optical identification of MSPs companion in GGCs; as a

142: part of this project in this Letter we present the identification of

143: the optical counterpart to the PSR J1911-5958A

144: companion.

145:    

146: \section{Observations and data analysis}

147: \label{sec:obs}

148:  

149: The photometric data presented here consist of a set of high

150: resolution images obtained by using the camera FORS1 mounted at the

151: {\it ANTU} Unit Telescope 1 (UT1) of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at

152: ESO on Cerro Paranal (Chile) on three nigths in March, April and May

153: 2003. All the observations have been performed in the High Resolution

154: (HR) mode of FORS1. In this configuration the plate-scale is

155: $0\farcs1/pixel$ and the FORS1 $2048\times2048$ pixel$^2$ array has a

156: global field of view of $3\farcm4 \times 3\farcm4$.  The data comprise

157: eight 220\,s $V$-band exposures, five 360\,s $B$-band exposures and

158: three 1500\,s $U$-band exposures, roughly centered on the \pula

159: (hereafter MSP-A) nominal position. All the observations were

160: performed in service mode under good seeing conditions

161: (FWHM$=0\farcs5-0\farcs7$).

162: 

163: A sub-image of $800\times 800$ pixels centered on the nominal position

164: of the MSP-A has been extracted from the original frames and carefully

165: analized.  All the reductions have been carried out using ROMAFOT

166: \citep{buonanno83}, a package specifically developed to perform

167: accurate photometry in crowded fields, allowing for a visual

168: inspection of the quality of the PSF-fitting procedure.  In order to

169: optimize the search for faint objects a {\it median}-combined image in

170: each band has been obtained and the search procedure has been

171: performed on the deepest combined image.  Then the masks with the star

172: positions have been adapted to each image and the PSF-fitting

173: procedure performed on each individual frame separately.  The

174: resulting instrumental magnitudes have been transformed to a common

175: photometric system and then averaged. Thus, a final catalogue with the

176: coordinates and the average instrumental magnitude in each filter has

177: been compiled for all the stars identified in the considered

178: sub-image.  Photometric calibration of the instrumental magnitudes (in

179: the $B$ and $U$ band) was obtained using four photometric standard

180: stars \citep{landolt92} secured under photometric conditions. Since no

181: accurate calibration of the V filter was possible with the data

182: secured in service, we calibrated the $V$ magnitude by using $\sim

183: 200$ stars in common with the $B,V$ catalog recently published by

184: \citet{ferraro03}. The stars in common between the two catalogs

185: permitted also an independent check of the calibration obtained in the

186: $B$ band, displaying agreement within a few hundredths of magnitude.

187: 

188: The stars identified in the considered sub-image have been reported to

189: an absolute astrometric system by using the 200 stars in common with

190: the \citet{ferraro03} catalog (already astrometized).  The details

191: of the procedure adopted to derive the astrometric solution are

192: described in other papers \citep{ferraro01b,ferraro03}. In short, the

193: new astrometric {\it Guide Star Catalog} ($GSCII$) was used to search

194: for astrometric standard stars lying in the considered field of view (FoV).

195: At the end of the procedure, the rms residuals were of the order of

196: $\sim 0\farcs 3$ both in RA and Dec and we assume this value as

197: representative of the astrometric accuracy.  

198:  

199: \section{Results}

200:    

201: Figure~1 shows the $U,U-V$ and $B,B-V$ Color Magnitude Diagram (CMD)

202: for the stars ({\it large filled circles}) identified in the

203: $80\arcsec\times 80\arcsec$ FORS1 sub-image considered here. Most of the stars

204: trace a clean and well defined main sequence (MS) spanning almost 8

205: mags in the $U$ band reaching $U\sim 26$.  Only a few sparce objects,

206: showing a blue excess, are visible on the left side of the MS. The 

207: most extreme blue objects in the CMDs are CO white dwarfs (WDs): once

208: the MS is matched, they nicely overlaps the position of a CO-WDs

209: population (shown as {\it small empty circles} in Fig.~1)

210: observed in this cluster by \citet{renzini96} and

211: \citet[][2003b, in preparation]{ferraro97}. In particular, the colors and the

212: luminosities of the three CO-WDs found here and of the previously

213: observed population agree with the theoretical cooling sequence for

214: $0.5 M_{\odot}$ hydrogen rich WDs \citep{wood95} (drawn as {\it heavy

215: dashed line} in Fig.~1).

216:    

217: On the basis of the accurate astrometric positions obtained from the

218: photometric catalog, we identified a blue object (hereafter \compula$\!\!$)

219: lying at only $0\farcs 1$ from the nominal position of \pula$\!\!$.

220: Finding chart (in the $B$-band filter) for \\ 

221: \compula is shown in

222: Fig.~2. Only a few objects ($\sim 10$) are lying in the region of the CMD 

223: to the left of the MS: considering the FoV of the sub-image, there is a

224: very small probability ($\lsim 5\times 10^{-3}$) of detecting one of

225: the blue objects just by chance in a circular aperture of radius $\sim

226: 0\farcs 3$ (corresponding to the uncertainty in the relative radio-optical

227: astrometry) centered on the pulsar position.

228:      

229: The position of \compula is marked as a {\it large empty square} in

230: the CMDs in Fig.~1, whereas absolute coordinates and magnitudes are

231: listed in Table~1. Taking into account the expected variability of

232: this object and the global uncertainty in the calibration of the

233: photometric zero-point, we conservatively adopted an overall

234: uncertainty in the reported magnitudes of 0.15 mag.  While we were

235: writing this Letter a not yet refereed paper by Bassa et al. appeared

236: on the web (astro-ph/0307340) also presenting the optical

237: identification of this object. Though the identification is consistent

238: with that presented here, it can be considered, at most, a preliminary

239: detection since the object is nearly at the detection limit in the

240: exposures utilized in that paper. The deep VLT observations presented

241: here allow us to measure the object with a quite high S/N ratio

242: ($70-120$) and to derive the photometric properties of the star with

243: much higher accuracy.

244: 

245: The location of \compula in the CMDs ($\sim 1.5$ mag bluer than the MS

246: in the diagram) excludes it is a CO-WD whilst it resembles $U_{opt}$,

247: the companion to PSR J0024--7203U in 47 Tuc \citep{edmonds01},

248: which was suggested \citep{edmonds01} to be a low mass Helium core WD

249: (He-WD) from the comparison with theoretical models by

250: \citet{serenelli01}. However, the He-WD tracks used by

251: \citet{edmonds01} were computed for progenitors with high (solar)

252: metallicity ($Z=0.02$).

253:  

254: Here we have applied the same procedure taking advantage of a new set

255: of tracks specifically computed \citep{serenelli02} for globular

256: cluster applications, i.e. assuming progenitors with low

257: metallicities. In particular, we used the cooling tracks at $Z=0.001,$

258: which are the closest to the cluster metallicity

259: ($[Fe/H]=-1.43\pm0.04$) as recently derived by \citet{gratton03}. The

260: cooling sequences for two He-WD masses (0.172 and 0.197 \msun,

261: respectively) are over-plotted in Fig.~1 ({\it light dashed lines}).

262: The models have been drawn by adopting a distance modulus $(m-M)_0

263: =13.13$ \citep[from the homogeneous distance scale for 61 GGCs derived

264: by][]{ferraro99} and a reddening $E(B-V)=0.04$

265: \citep{harris96,gratton03}.  Note that the distance modulus adopted

266: here is consistent both with the estimate obtained from the WD cooling

267: sequence ($(m-M)_0 =13.05\pm 0.1$) by \citet{renzini96} and with the

268: most recent determination ($(m-M)_0 =13.12\pm 0.08$) derived from MS

269: fitting by \citet{gratton03}.

270:  

271: Inspection of Fig.~1 reveals that luminosity and color of \compula

272: well agree with its being a He-WD of mass in the range

273: $0.17-0.20~\msun.$ In particular, from the $Z=0.001$ models of masses

274: $0.172\msun$ and $0.197\msun$ by \citet{serenelli02}, we derive the

275: following estimates for the properties of \compula$\!\!$: a temperature in

276: the interval $T_{\rm eff}= 10,000-12,000~K$, a gravity $\log

277: g=6.12-6.38$, a luminosity $L=0.03-0.04~L_{\odot}$, a radius

278: $R=3-4\times 10^9$ cm and a cooling age in the range $1.2-2.8$ Gyr. 

279: 

280: \section{Discussion}

281: 

282: We have identified the optical companion to the millisecond pulsar

283: \pula located at 3.3 half mass radii from the center of the

284: globular cluster NGC6752. $U, B$ and $V$ magnitudes (and 

285: related colors) of the optical source are compatible with

286: its being a Helium white dwarf hosted in the globular's halo.

287: 

288: From the pulsar mass-function \citep[0.0026887 \msun,][]{damico02}, it

289: results a minimum companion mass (corresponding to a system seen

290: edge-on, i.e. with orbital inclination $i=90^\circ$) $M_{\rm

291: COM}=0.185~\msun$ for a pulsar mass of $1.35~\msun$

292: \citep{thorsett99}.  Given the upper limit ($M_{\rm COM}\lapp

293: 0.2~\msun$) of the range of masses of \compula inferred from the

294: cooling tracks of \citet{serenelli02}, we can constrain the

295: inclination $i$ to be larger than $\gapp 70^\circ$. Adopting a larger 

296: value for the pulsar mass would result in a even larger lower limit

297: for the orbital plane inclination. 

298: 

299: Dynamical friction can rapidly drive back to the cluster core a object

300: of total mass of order $1.6~\msun$ moving on a highly eccentric orbit

301: in the cluster potential. In particular, ejection of \pula from the

302: core to the outskirts of NGC6752 (implying a radial orbit) cannot be

303: occurred more than $\tau_{\rm df}=0.7-1$ Gyr ago \citep{colpi02}. The

304: cooling age of \compula is longer than $\tau_{\rm df},$ implying that

305: any dynamical event responsible for the ejection probably acted on an

306: already recycled millisecond pulsar. Hence, the optical identification

307: of \compula tends to exclude {\it (i)} the scenarios in which the

308: recycling process occurred after (or was triggered by) the dynamical

309: encounter which propelled the pulsar in the cluster halo (but see the

310: discussion in Sigurdsson, 2003) and {\it (ii)} any kinds of

311: interactions imparting a significant eccentricity to the binary pulsar

312: (having excluded a recent mass transfer phase, the circularization of

313: the system at the present level, $e\lsim 10^{-5},$ would require a

314: time much longer than $\tau_{\rm df}$). In particular, among the

315: proposed black hole hypotheses \citep{colpi03a,colpi03b} a binary

316: black hole of mass in the range 10-200 \msun~seems the most plausible

317: candidate.

318: 

319: Since the first discovery of an optical counterpart to a binary MSP

320: companion in GGC \citep[$U_{opt}$, the companion to PSR~J0024$-$7203U

321: in 47 Tuc;][]{edmonds01}, the zoo of the optical MSP counterparts in

322: GGCs is rapidly increasing: a surprisingly bright object

323: (COM~J1740$-$5340, either a subgiant or a heated MS) has been

324: discovered \citep{ferraro01b} in NGC6397, and a very faint source

325: (W29, the companion to PSR~J0024$-$7204W) has been found by

326: \citet{edmonds02} in 47 Tuc. Moreover, an additional potential MSP

327: companion (W34 in 47 Tuc) has been recently discussed by

328: \citet{edmonds03}. Fig.~3 shows a comparison of the photometric

329: properties of the available optical identifications of MSP companions

330: hosted in GGCs. The MS stars of NGC6752, the models of CO-WD and two

331: He-WD cooling sequences by \citet{serenelli02} are also plotted in

332: Fig.~3 as reference.  Two among the five sources seem really peculiar:

333: i.e., the bright object in NGC6397 (which is as luminous as the turn

334: off stars and shows quite red colours) and the faint W29 in 47 Tuc,

335: which is also too red to be a He-WD \citep{edmonds02}.  Bassa et

336: al. (2003) suggested a similiarity between the photometric properties

337: of \compula and W29 in 47 Tuc.  As can be seen from Figure 3, \compula

338: is significantly brighter and bluer than W29 and it turns out to be

339: more similar to $U_{opt}$. Indeed, $U_{opt}$ and \compula are found to

340: lie nearly on the same mass He-WD cooling sequence and W34 in 47 Tuc

341: curiously shares the same photometric properties of \compula. Indeed,

342: if confirmed as a MSP companion, W34 would be the third He-WD

343: companion orbiting a MSP in GGCs roughly located on the same-mass

344: cooling sequence.  If further supported by additional cases, this

345: evidence could confirm that a low mass $\sim 0.15-0.2~\msun$ He-WD

346: orbiting a MSP is the favoured system generated by the recycling

347: process of MSPs not only in the Galactic field \citep{hp98} but also

348: in GGCs \citep{rasio00}. 

349:   

350: \compula is relatively bright and will allow detailed follow-up

351: observations: both optical time series photometry and spectroscopy of

352: this object are planned at the ESO VLT, in order to determine the

353: parameters of the He-WD companion, the mass ratio of the two

354: components of the binary and eventually the mass of the neutron star.

355:      

356: \acknowledgements{

357: We warmly thank Elena Valenti for assistance during the astrometry

358: procedure and Leandro Althaus for pointed out the updated He-WD

359: models. The authors wish to thank the Referee for helpful suggestions

360: in revising the manuscript.  The financial support of the Agenzia

361: Spaziale Italiana (ASI) is kindly acknowledged. A.P and

362: N.D'A. received financial support from the Italian Space Agency (ASI)

363: and the Italian Minister of Research (MIUR) under {\it Cofin 2001}

364: national program.}

365:      

366: \begin{thebibliography}{}

367: 

368: \bibitem[Bassa et al., 2003]{bassa03}

369: Bassa, C.~G., Verbunt, F., van KerKwijkm M.~H., \& Homer, L. 2003,

370: A\&A (submitted), astro--ph/0307340

371: 

372: \bibitem[Buonanno et al., 1983]{buonanno83}

373: Buonanno, R., Buscema, G., Corsi, C.~E, Ferraro, I., \& Iannicola, G. 1983,

374: A\&A, 126, 278

375: 

376: \bibitem[Colpi et al., 2002]{colpi02}

377: Colpi, M., Possenti, A., \& Gualandris, A. 2002, \apj, 570, L85

378: 

379: \bibitem[Colpi et al., 2003a]{colpi03a}

380: Colpi, M., Mapelli, M., \& Possenti, A. 2003a, "Coevolution of Black Hols and

381: Galaxies", Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 1: ed. L.~C. Ho

382: (Pasadena: Carnegie Observatories), astro--ph/0302545

383: 

384: \bibitem[Colpi et al., 2003b]{colpi03b}

385: Colpi, M., Mapelli, M., \& Possenti, A. 2003b, \apj, in press

386:  

387: \bibitem[D'Amico et al., 2001]{damico01}

388: D'Amico, N., Lyne, A.~G., Manchester, R.~N., Possenti, A., \& Camilo, F. 2001,

389: \apj, 561, L171

390: 

391: \bibitem[D'Amico et al., 2002]{damico02}

392: D'Amico, N., Possenti, A., Fici, L., Manchester, R.~N., Lyne, 

393: A.~G., Camilo, F., \& Sarkissian, J. 2002, \apj, 570, L89

394: 

395: \bibitem[Edmonds et al., 2001]{edmonds01} 

396: Edmonds, P.~D., Gilliland, R.~L., Heinke, C.~O., Grindlay, J.~E., \& Camilo, F.

397: 2001, \apjl, 557, L57 

398: 

399: \bibitem[Edmonds et al., 2002]{edmonds02} 

400: Edmonds, P.~D., Gilliland, R.~L., Camilo, F., Heinke, C.~O., \& Grindlay, J.~E.

401: 2002, \apj, 579, 741 

402: 

403: \bibitem[Edmonds et al., 2003]{edmonds03}

404: Edmonds, P.~D., Gilliland, R.~L., Heinke, C.~O, \& Grindlay, J.~E. 2003

405: \aj (in press), astro--ph/0307189

406: 

407: \bibitem[Ferraro et al., 1997]{ferraro97}

408: Ferraro, F.~R., Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Renzini, A., \& Ortolani, S. 1997,

409: \mnras, 286, 1012

410: 

411: \bibitem[Ferraro et al., 1999]{ferraro99} 

412: Ferraro, F.~R., Messineo, M., Fusi Pecci, F., de Palo, M.~A., 

413: Straniero, O., Chieffi, A., \& Limongi, M. 1999, \aj, 118, 1738 

414: 

415: \bibitem[Ferraro et al., 2001a]{ferraro01a}

416: Ferraro, F.~R., D'Amico, N., Possenti, A., Mignani, R.~P., \& Paltrinieri, B.

417: 2001a, \apj, 561, 337

418: 

419: \bibitem[Ferraro et al., 2001b]{ferraro01b}

420: Ferraro, F.~R., Possenti, A., D'Amico, N., \& Sabbi, E. 2001b, ApJ, 561, L93

421: 

422: \bibitem[Ferraro et al., 2003]{ferraro03}

423: Ferraro, F.~R., Possenti, A., Sabbi., E., Lagani, P., Rood, R.~T., \& Origlia,

424: L. 2003, \apj,  (in press), astro--ph/0306138

425: 

426: \bibitem[Gratton et al., 2003]{gratton03}

427: Gratton, R., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Clementini, G., Desidera, S.,

428: Grundhal, F \& Lucatello, S. 2003, ApJ, (in press), astro--ph/0307016

429: 

430: \bibitem[Hansen \& Phinney, 1998]{hp98} Hansen, B.M.S., Phinney,

431: E.S., 1998, MNRAS, 294, 569

432: 

433: \bibitem[Harris, 1996]{harris96} 

434: Harris, W.~E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487 

435: 

436: \bibitem[Landolt, 1992]{landolt92}

437: Landolt, A.~U 1992, \aj, 104, 340

438: 

439: \bibitem[Rasio et al., 2000]{rasio00} Rasio, F.A., Pfahl,

440: E.D., Rappaport, S., 2000, \apj, 532, L47

441: 

442: \bibitem[Renzini et al., 1996]{renzini96}

443: Renzini, A.~et al. 1996, \apj, 465, L23

444: 

445: \bibitem[Serenelli et al., 2001]{serenelli01}

446: Serenelli, A.~M, Althaus, L.~G., Rohrmann, R.~D., \& Benvenuto, O.~G. 2001,

447: \mnras, 325, 607

448: 

449: \bibitem[Serenelli et al., 2002]{serenelli02} 

450: Serenelli, A.~M., Althaus, L.~G., Rohrmann, R.~D., \& Benvenuto, O.~G. 2002, 

451: \mnras, 337, 1091 

452: 

453: \bibitem[Sigurdsson, 2003]{sigurdsson03}

454: Sigurdsson, S. 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. (astro--ph/0303312)

455: 

456: \bibitem[Thorsett \& Chakrabarty, 1999]{thorsett99} 

457: Thorsett, S.~E.~\& Chakrabarty, D. 1999, \apj, 512, 288 

458: 

459: \bibitem[Wood, 1995]{wood95} 

460: Wood, M.~A. 1995, LNP Vol.~443: White Dwarfs, 41 

461: 

462: \bibitem[Zoccali et al., 2001]{zoccali01}

463: Zoccali, M., Renzini, A., Ortolani, S., Bragalia, A.,

464: Bohlin, R., Carretta, E., Ferraro, F.~R., Gilmozzi, R.,

465: et al. 2001, \apj, 553, 733 

466:  

467: \end{thebibliography}

468: 

469: \clearpage

470:   

471: \begin{figure} 

472: \plotone{f1.ps} 

473: \caption{

474: ($(U,U-V)$) and ($(B,B-V)$) CMDs for the stars identified in a region

475: of $80\arcsec \times80\arcsec$ centered at the nominal position of the

476: \pula. The optical counterpart to the pulsar companion

477: (\compula$\!\!$) is marked with a {\it large empty square}.  The {\it

478: heavy dashed line} is the CO-WD cooling sequence from \citet{wood95};

479: the two {\it light dashed lines} are the cooling tracks for He WD

480: masses 0.197 and 0.172 $M_{\odot}$ (the lowest mass model is the

481: reddest one) from \citet{serenelli02}. The {\it small triangles} along

482: the two tracks labels different ages (1,2 and 3 Gyr, respectively).

483: The CO-WD population observed in this cluster by Renzini et al. (1996)

484: and Ferraro et al. (1997, 2003b, in preparation) is also plotted as {\it

485: small open circles} in the left panel.

486: \label{fig:CMDs}}

487: \end{figure}

488:   

489:  \clearpage 

490: 

491: \begin{figure} 

492: \plotone{f2.ps} 

493: \caption{Finding chart for \compula showing the median-combined B-band

494: image. The region covers $15\arcsec \times15\arcsec$, also plotted is

495: the $1\sigma$ error circle ($0\farcs 3$) for the absolute astrometric

496: positioning of the optical image. North is up and East is to the left.

497: \label{fig:chart}}

498: \end{figure}

499: 

500: \clearpage

501:  

502: \begin{figure}

503: \plotone{f3.ps} 

504: \caption{Optical companions to MSP detected in GGCs in the

505: ($M_U,(U-V)_0$) absolute plane: \compula is plotted as in Figure 1,

506: while the other objects with a {\it large empty square}.  As in Figure

507: 1, we present the cooling tracks for He-WD from Serenelli et

508: al. (2002) and the CO-WD cooling sequence from Wood (1995). Main

509: sequence stars of NGC6752 are also plotted ({\it small open circles})

510: as reference.  Note that $U_{opt}$ and \compula appear to lie along

511: the same He-WD cooling sequence. Also W34 in 47 Tuc (if confirmed to

512: be a MSP companion) shares the same photometric properties of

513: \compula$\!\!$. In order to place in the plot the 3 objects belonging to 47

514: Tuc, the distance modulus ($(m-M)_0=13.27$) and the reddening

515: ($E(B-V)=0.055$) of this cluster have been adopted according to

516: Zoccali et al. (2001); the approximate position of COM J1740$-$5340 

517: (companion to PSR J1740$-$5340 in NGC6397) in the absolute plane has

518: been obtained by shifting the CMD of Figure 1 of Ferraro et

519: al. (2001b) to match the main sequence of NGC6752.

520: \label{fig:allMSPcomp}}

521: \end{figure}

522: 

523: \clearpage

524:  

525: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}

526: \scriptsize

527: \tablewidth{15cm}

528: \label{tab:uve}

529: \tablecaption{Photometric data and position for \compula}

530: \tablehead{

531: \colhead{} &

532: \colhead{} &

533: \colhead{$ V$} &

534: \colhead{$ B$} &

535: \colhead{ $U$} &

536: \colhead{$\alpha_{\rm J2000}$} &

537: \colhead{$\delta_{\rm J2000}$}  }

538: \startdata

539: \compula & & 22.03 & 22.13 & 22.06 &

540:  $19^{\rm h}\, 11^{\rm m}\, 42\fs743$  &

541: $ -59\arcdeg\, 58\arcmin\, 26\farcs85$  \\ 

542: \enddata

543: \end{deluxetable}

544:    

545: \end{document}

546: