1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: %\documentclass[eclepsf,twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
22: \documentclass[eclepsf,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
24:
25: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
28: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
29: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
30: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
31:
32:
33: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
34: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
35: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
36:
37: %\nofiles
38:
39: \begin{document}
40:
41: %\preprint{APS/123-QED}
42:
43: \title{Wave effect in gravitational lensing by a cosmic string
44: }
45:
46: \author{Kazuhiro Yamamoto and Keiji Tsunoda}
47: % \altaffiliation[Also at ]{Physics Department, XYZ University.}
48: %Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
49: %\author{Second Author}%
50: % \email{Second.Author@institution.edu}
51: \affiliation{
52: Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University,
53: Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526,~Japan}
54:
55: %\author{Charlie Author}
56: % \homepage{http://www.Second.institution.edu/~Charlie.Author}
57: %\affiliation{
58: %Second institution and/or address\\
59: %This line break forced% with \\
60: %}%
61:
62: %\date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
63: % but any date may be explicitly specified
64:
65: \begin{abstract}
66: The wave effect in the gravitational lensing phenomenon by a straight
67: cosmic string is investigated. The interference pattern is expressed
68: in terms of a simple formula. We demonstrate that modulations of the
69: interfered wave amplitude can be a unique signature of the wave
70: effect. We briefly mention a possible chance of detecting the wave
71: effect in future gravitational wave observatories.
72: \end{abstract}
73:
74: \pacs{98.80.Cq}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
75: % Classification Scheme.
76: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
77: %display desired
78: \maketitle
79:
80:
81: %~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
82:
83: \def\M{{M}}
84: %-----------------------------------------------------------
85: \section{Introduction}
86: %-----------------------------------------------------------
87:
88: The standard model of elementary particle theory involves
89: the mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking, which
90: predicts phase transitions in the early universe.
91: In general, such phase transitions produce topological
92: defects, depending on the symmetry spontaneously broken.
93: The cosmic string is the topological defect produced when
94: a $U(1)$ symmetry is broken \cite{KT}.
95: Historically, the cosmic
96: strings were well investigated, motivated by a possible
97: mechanism to explain the structure formation of the universe
98: \cite{Stringformation}.
99: However, this possibility is severely limited or rejected
100: by the observation of large scale structure of the
101: galaxies and the measurements of the cosmic microwave
102: background (CMB) anisotropies \cite{WMAP,2dF}.
103: Thus the cosmic strings cannot play a central role in
104: structure formation, which constrains the cosmic string
105: energy density. But, we also note that a cosmological model with a
106: non-negligible defect contribution has not been rejected completely.
107: It is argued that the model with a mixture of inflation
108: and topological defects can be compatible with a CMB anisotropy
109: data \cite{BPRS}.
110:
111: On the other hand, other possible roles of the cosmic strings are
112: considered. For example, Sazhin et al. have reported
113: detection of the source which is naturally explained
114: by lensing effect of a cosmic string \cite{Sazhin}.
115: The gravitational lensing effect due to the cosmic strings
116: has been investigated by several authors
117: \cite{Vilenkin,Gott,LV,DEL,BU}. Actually the gravitational
118: lensing phenomenon is known as a possible unique probe to detect
119: the cosmic strings. The prospect to detect the cosmic string with
120: wide field galaxy surveys is discussed \cite{HV,Shirasaki}.
121: In the present paper, we investigate the wave effect in the
122: gravitational lensing by the cosmic string.
123: Recently wave effect in gravitational lensing
124: has been investigated, motivated by the gravitational
125: wave observation \cite{TN,Seto,PINQ,BHN,TTN}.
126: These works focus on wave effect by isolated lenses
127: (see also \cite{SEF,Deguchi}). However, the wave effect
128: in the lensing by the cosmic string has not been investigated,
129: as far as we know.
130:
131: This paper is organized as follows:
132: In Sec. 2 we present a solution of the wave equation
133: on the background spacetime with a straight static cosmic string.
134: Then we show the condition that the interference occurs as a
135: wave effect.
136: In Sec. 3, we demonstrate typical numbers of gravitational
137: lensing by the cosmic string.
138: We also discuss a possibility of detecting the interference in the
139: lensing of gravitational waves from a compact binary in Sec. 4.
140: Sec. 5 is devoted to conclusions.
141: %We follow the convention of the metric $(+---)$ and
142: We use the convention $G=c=1$, otherwise we express them explicitly.
143: %-----------------------------------------------------------
144: \section{Wave Solution}
145: %-----------------------------------------------------------
146: \def\dls{{D_{\rm LS}}}
147: \def\dos{{D_{\rm OS}}}
148:
149: The properties of a cosmic string in a vacuum spacetime
150: was studied by Vilenkin \cite{VilenkinA}. He showed that
151: the local nature of the solution is same as that of the
152: Minkowski spacetime, but the conical singularity arises
153: around the cosmic string.
154: This is the origin of the deficit angle
155: $\delta=8\pi \mu$ of the spacetime, where $\mu$ is the
156: energy (line) density of the cosmic string.
157: The energy density $\mu$ depends on the individual model of the
158: cosmic string, however, the constraint on $\mu$
159: from cosmological observations of the galaxy large scale
160: structure and the cosmic microwave background anisotropies
161: is $\mu\simlt 10^{-6}$ (\cite{HV} and references therein).
162:
163: We consider the simple configuration (see Fig. 1):
164: A straight string is located parallel to the $z$ axis.
165: The source is located on the coordinate $A=(-L\cos[\delta/2],L\sin[\delta/2],0)$
166: and $B=(-L\cos[\delta/2],-L\sin[\delta/2],0)$, where both $A$ and $B$ are identical
167: because this spacetime has the conical singularity.
168: Denoting the coordinate of an observer $(x,y,z)$,
169: the distance between $A (B)$ and the observer is
170: \begin{eqnarray}
171: &&r_1=\sqrt{\left(x+L\cos{\delta\over 2}\right)^2
172: +\left(y-L\sin{\delta\over 2}\right)^2+z^2},
173: \label{ra}
174: \\
175: &&r_2=\sqrt{\left(x+L\cos{\delta\over 2}\right)^2
176: +\left(y+L\sin{\delta\over 2}\right)^2+z^2},
177: \label{rb}
178: \end{eqnarray}
179: respectively. We assume that the amplitude of the wave field is expressed as
180: \begin{eqnarray}
181: {\cal E}
182: &=&A_0{\cos(\omega t-kr_1)\over r_1}\Theta(y+x\tan{\delta/2})
183: +A_0{\cos(\omega t-kr_2)\over r_2}\Theta(y-x\tan{\delta/2}),
184: \label{calEE}
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: where $\Theta(X)$ is the Heaviside function and $A_0$ is a constant.
187: The interference occurs in the region
188: $y\ge -x\tan{\delta/2}$ and $y\le x\tan{\delta/2}$.
189: Within this region we have
190: \begin{eqnarray}
191: {\cal E}
192: &\simeq&{2A_0\over r}\cos\left[\left(\omega t-k{r_1+r_2\over2}\right)\right]
193: \cos\left[{k(r_1-r_2)\over2}\right]
194: \end{eqnarray}
195: with $r=\sqrt{(x+L)^2+z^2}$. Thus the amplitude of the wave
196: is determined by the phase $k(r_1-r_2)/2$ because of the interference.
197: Using eqs. (\ref{ra}) and (\ref{rb}), the path difference is
198: \begin{eqnarray}
199: r_1-r_2&\simeq& {2y\sin[\delta/2]} {L\over \sqrt{(x+L)^2+z^2}}
200: ={2y \sin[\delta/2]}{ \dls \sin\theta \over \dos},
201: \label{rr}
202: \end{eqnarray}
203: where we assumed $y\ll z,x,L$, in the last equality, we used
204: $\theta$ to denote the angle between the string direction
205: and the line of sight, and $\dls$ and $\dos$ to denote
206: angular diameter distances from observer to source and
207: string to source, respectively.
208: The condition that the wave amplitude has a maximum is
209: \begin{eqnarray}
210: k(r_1-r_2)/2=n\pi
211: \label{krr}
212: \end{eqnarray}
213: with integer $n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\cdots \pm n_{\rm max}$,
214: where $n_{\rm max}$ is the largest integer satisfying
215: \begin{eqnarray}
216: \pi|n|\le kx \sin^2[\delta/2] { \dls \sin\theta \over \dos}.
217: \end{eqnarray}
218:
219:
220:
221: %-----------------------------------------------------------
222: \section{Typical numbers}
223: %-----------------------------------------------------------
224: \def\Hz{{\rm Hz}}
225:
226: In this section we estimate quantitatively physical
227: numbers of the gravitational lensing system by the cosmic
228: string. It is well known that the angular separation of
229: two images is
230: \begin{eqnarray}
231: \Delta \alpha= 2\sin[\delta/2] {\dls\sin\theta\over\dos}
232: \simeq 2''
233: \left({\delta\over 10^{-5}}\right)
234: \left({\dls\sin\theta\over\dos}\right).
235: \end{eqnarray}
236: The path difference causes time delay, defined by
237: $T_{dl}={|r_1-r_2|/c}$. To estimate its typical number,
238: we set $y=(1+z_L)D_{\rm LO}\sin[\delta/2]/2$ as a typical
239: value in eq. (\ref{rr}), where $D_{\rm LO}$ is the angular
240: diameter distance between the string and observer. Then,
241: we have
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: T_{dl}&=&{(1+z_L)\sin^2[\delta/2]D_{\rm LO}\over c} \left({\dls\sin\theta\over \dos}\right)
244: \nonumber
245: \\
246: &\simeq&10^7 (1+z_L) \left({\delta \over 10^{-5}}\right)^2
247: \left({D_{\rm LO} \over cH_0^{-1}}\right)
248: \left({\dls\sin\theta\over\dos}\right)~{\rm sec}
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: with the Hubble constant $H_0=70~{\rm km/s/Mpc}$.
251:
252: On the other hand, eq. (\ref{krr}) is the condition for
253: the maximum peak of the wave. Therefore the wave effect is
254: characterized by the length between two neighboring peaks,
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: \Delta y={\pi\over k\sin[\delta/2]}
257: \left({\dos\over\dls\sin\theta}\right) \simeq 3\times 10^{15}
258: \left({1{\Hz}\over \nu}\right)
259: \left({10^{-5}\over \delta}\right)
260: \left({\dos\over\dls\sin\theta}\right)~{\rm cm},
261: \end{eqnarray}
262: where $\nu$ is the frequency of the wave. Thus $\Delta y$ can
263: be an astronomical distance and the observed amplitude of the
264: wave changes in this periodic interval due to the wave effect.
265: If the string moves in a direction perpendicular to the line
266: of sight direction, the amplitude of the wave will modulate
267: periodically. Assuming
268: that the cosmic string moves in the direction of $y$ axis
269: with a speed near the velocity of light,
270: the typical period of the modulation is roughly estimated as
271: \begin{eqnarray}
272: {\cal T}_v={\Delta y\over c} \simeq 10^7
273: \left({0.01{\Hz}\over \nu}\right)
274: \left({10^{-5}\over \delta}\right)
275: \left({\dos\over\dls\sin\theta}\right)~{\rm sec}.
276: \end{eqnarray}
277:
278: The statistical probability of the gravitational lensing
279: by a cosmic string can be estimated as follows:
280: The probability for lensing for a single source
281: at the redshift $z_S$ due to infinitely long cosmic
282: string located at the redshift $z_L$ is \cite{HV}
283: \begin{eqnarray}
284: P(z_S,z_L)\sim {2\delta\over \pi^2}{\dls\over\dos}
285: \simeq 2\times10^{-6} \left({\delta\over 10^{-5}}\right)
286: \left({\dls\over\dos}\right).
287: \end{eqnarray}
288: Thus the probability for a cosmic string is very small.
289: However, numerical simulations of string networks show the
290: possibility that more strings can exist within the horizon
291: effectively \cite{DEL,BB}.
292:
293:
294: \section{Wave effect in gravitational waves}
295: \def\calT{{\cal T}}
296:
297: Now let us consider a gravitational wave from a massive binary
298: with an equal mass $M$ as a source. We assume that the
299: binary angular frequency $\bar \omega$ corresponds to the
300: frequency of the gravitational wave $\nu$ of an observer
301: by $\bar\omega=2\pi\nu(1+z_S)$.
302: The lifetime of the binary system $T_{lf}$ must be longer
303: than the time delay $T_{dl}$ so that the interference occurs.
304: The binary lifetime is estimated \cite{Schutz}
305: \begin{eqnarray}
306: T_{lf}\sim 0.02M^{-5/3} \bar\omega^{-8/3}\simeq{1.3\times 10^5\over (1+z_S)^{8/3} }
307: \left({M\over M_{\odot}}\right)^{-5/3}
308: \biggl({\nu \over {\rm Hz}}\biggr)^{-8/3}~{\rm sec} .
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: Then, the condition $T_{lf}>T_{dl}$ yields
311: \begin{eqnarray}
312: {M}&<&{120\over (1+z_L)^{3/5}(1+z_S)^{8/5}}
313: \nonumber
314: \\
315: &&\times\biggl({\nu\over 0.01 \Hz}\biggr)^{-8/5}
316: \left({\delta\over 10^{-5}}\right)^{-6/5}
317: \left({D_{\rm LO}\over c H_0^{-1}}\right)^{-3/5}
318: \left({\dls \sin\theta \over \dos}\right)^{-3/5}~ M_{\odot}.
319: \label{Mmax}
320: \end{eqnarray}
321: The DECIGO planed as a future gravitational wave observatory has an
322: excellent sensitivity around $\nu=0.1~\Hz$ \cite{SKN}.
323: For $\nu=0.01~{\rm Hz}$ and $\delta=10^{-5}$, eq. (\ref{Mmax})
324: yields the maximum mass of the binary larger than $ 1 M_{\odot}$.
325: Thus the neutron stars (NS-NS) binary can be the source for the
326: wave effect.
327:
328: Due to emission of the gravitational waves, the binary orbit
329: changes, then the angular frequency of the wave changes.
330: Namely, waves with different angular frequencies
331: interfere because of the time delay effect. This causes
332: another modulation of the wave amplitude as a wave effect,
333: whose period is approximately written as
334: %can be approximately described, from equation (\ref{calEE}),
335: %\begin{eqnarray}
336: % {\cal E}\propto
337: %\cos\biggl[{(\omega_1-\omega_2)t-(k_1r_1-k_2r_2)\over 2}\biggr],
338: %\simeq
339: %\cos\biggl[{{d\omega/ dt}(r_1-r_2)t-k(r_1-r_2)\over 2}\biggr],
340: %\end{eqnarray}
341: %then the period is
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \calT_{p}&=&\displaystyle{{4\pi \over (r_1-r_2){d\omega/dt}}}
344: \nonumber
345: \\
346: &\simeq&{1.5\times 10^{6}\over (1+z_L)(1+z_S)^{5/3}}
347: \biggl({\nu\over 0.01\Hz}\biggr)^{-11/3}
348: \left({M\over M_{\odot}}\right)^{-5/3}
349: \left({ 10^{-5}\over \delta}\right)^{2}
350: \left({c H_0^{-1}\over D_{\rm LO}}\right)
351: \left({\dos\over \dls \sin\theta }\right)~{\rm sec}.
352: \nonumber
353: \\
354: \end{eqnarray}
355: For $\nu\simgt 0.01~\Hz$ and $M\sim M_\odot$, ${\cal T}_{p}$ is
356: shorter than the period of the modulation due to the string motion ${\cal T}_{v}$.
357:
358:
359: %-----------------------------------------------------------
360: \section{Conclusion}
361: %-----------------------------------------------------------
362: In this work we have investigated wave effect in gravitational
363: lensing by a cosmic string. Our investigation is limited to the simplest
364: case of the static and straight cosmic string. In this case the
365: interference of the wave field is expressed in a very simple form eq.
366: (\ref{rr}). The condition that the interference occurs is eq.
367: (\ref{krr}). When the string moves in the direction perpendicular
368: to the line of sight direction, the wave amplitude for an observer
369: will modulate by a wave effect in gravitational lensing.
370: A chirp gravitational wave from a compact binary at a cosmological
371: distance is a possible source in which we might detect the wave effect.
372: However, concerning this source, the change of orbit due to
373: gravitational wave emission causes another modulation of the wave amplitude.
374: These modulations can be a unique signature of the cosmic string
375: when a detector with sufficient angular resolution and sensitivity
376: is assumed.
377: %
378: Due to the same mechanism, a similar modulation can appear in a chirp
379: gravitational wave by the gravitational lensing by a galaxy halo \cite{Yamamoto}.
380: However, in this case, the flux ratio of two waves must be almost
381: $1$ for the clear modulation. Namely, a configuration of a lensing system
382: near the Einstein ring must be required. This means that the lensing
383: probability is relatively small and the flux is amplified by the
384: magnification effect. Thus, in principle, it can be discriminated
385: whether the lens causing the modulating signal is a cosmic string or
386: a galaxy halo.
387:
388: In the present work, we have considered an idealized situation.
389: We have assumed a point source, neglecting the finite size effect
390: of the source. For the gravitational wave from a compact binary,
391: however, the assumption will be plausible. We have considered
392: the interference of two waves with the same amplitude. The change
393: of the orbit of compact binary results in a difference between the
394: two wave amplitudes due to the time delay effect. However, it can
395: be negligible for a low frequency binary $\nu\sim 0.01~\Hz$
396: with $M\sim M_\odot$.
397:
398: Various sources of gravitational waves and their detectability
399: have been considered (e.g., \cite{Hughes} for a recent review).
400: Binaries of massive objects will be the most stable source of a
401: periodic wave, and NS-NS binary is the most promising source.
402: The ground based detectors, such as LIGO and VIRGO, have the sensitivity
403: in the high frequency band, $1~$Hz$\simlt f\simlt 10^4~$Hz, which
404: corresponds to that of gravitational waves from the NS-NS binary
405: at final coalescing stage.
406: On the other hand, the gravitational wave observatories in space,
407: such as LISA and DECIGO, will detect gravitational waves in the low
408: frequency band, $10^{-4}~$Hz$\simlt f\simlt 1~$Hz.
409: The modulation will not be observed by the facility with the high
410: frequency band because it appears in stable and periodic gravitational
411: waves. However, the facility with the low frequency band might have a
412: chance to observe the modulation, if the sensitivity was sufficient.
413: The detectability of a signal depends on the distance of a
414: source and a method of data analysis, therefore more details
415: are needed for the definite conclusion. Actually, when the angular
416: resolution is not sufficient, modulations of gravitational waves
417: can appear due to superposition of waves from different individual
418: binary sources.
419:
420:
421:
422: \vspace{1mm}
423: {\it Acknowledgments}
424: The authors thank Y. Kojima for reading the manuscript and
425: useful discussions and comments. K.Y. thanks T. Hayashino
426: for useful communication.
427: This work is supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for
428: Scientific research of Japanese Ministry of Education,
429: Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Grant No.15740155.
430:
431: %\newpage
432: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
433: \bibitem{KT} E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, {\it The Early Universe},
434: (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993)
435: \bibitem{Stringformation}
436: e.g., C. Contaldi, M. Hindmarsh, and J. Magueijo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 679 (1997);
437: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2034 (1999)
438: \bibitem{WMAP}
439: D. N. Spergel et al. astro-ph/0302209
440: \bibitem{2dF}
441: e.g., W. J. Percival et al. astro-ph/0206256
442: \bibitem{BPRS}
443: F. R. Bouchet, P. Peter, A. Riazuelo, and M. Sakellariadou, Phys. Rev. D 65, 021301-1 (2001)
444: \bibitem{Sazhin} M. Sazhin et al. astro-ph/0302547, MNRAS in press
445: \bibitem{Vilenkin}A. Vilenkin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 282, L51 (1984)
446: \bibitem{Gott} J. R. Gott, Astrophys. J. 288, 422 (1985)
447: \bibitem{LV} A. A. de Laix and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4780 (1996)
448: \bibitem{DEL} A. A. de Laix, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6193 (1997)
449: \bibitem{BU} F. Bernardeau and J-P Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 63, 023005 (2000)
450: \bibitem{HV} G. Huterer and T. Vachaspati, astro-ph/0305006
451: \bibitem{Shirasaki} Y. Shirasaki, E. Matsuzaki, Y. Mizumoto,
452: F. Kakimoto, S. Ogio, N. Yasuda, M. Tanaka, H. Yahagi, M. Nagashima, and G. Kosugi,
453: astro-ph/0305353
454: \bibitem{TN} R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, astro-ph/0305055
455: \bibitem{Seto} N. Seto, astro-ph/0305605
456: \bibitem{PINQ} F. de Paolis, G. Ingross, A. A. Nucita, and A. Qadir,
457: Astron. Astrophys. 394, 749 (2002)
458: \bibitem{BHN} C. Baraldo, A. Hosoya, and T. T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 59, 083001 (1999).
459: \bibitem{TTN} T. T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1138 (1998)
460: \bibitem{SEF} P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, {\it Gravitational Lenses }
461: (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992)
462: \bibitem{Deguchi} S. Deguchi and W. D. Watson, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1708 (1986);
463: Astrophys. J. 307, 30 (1986)
464: \bibitem{VilenkinA} A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 23, 852 (1981)
465: \bibitem{BB}D. P. Bennet and F. R. Bouchet, in {\it
466: The Formation and Evolution of Cosmic Strings},
467: eds. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking and T. Vachaspati (Cambridge University Press,
468: Cambridge, 1990)
469: \bibitem{Schutz} B. F. Schutz, {\it A first course in general relativity},
470: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985)
471: \bibitem{SKN} N. Seto, S. Kawamura, T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221103 (2001)
472: \bibitem{Yamamoto} K. Yamamoto, (unpublished)
473: \bibitem{Hughes} S. A. Hughes, Annals of Physics 303, 142 (2003)
474: \end{thebibliography}
475:
476:
477: \newpage
478: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
479: \begin{figure*}
480: \includegraphics{fig1.eps}% Here is how to import EPS art
481: \caption{\label{fig1} Configuration of the lensing system:
482: The cosmic string is located parallel to the $z$ axis.
483: This figure shows a projection on the $x-y$ plane.
484: The dashed two lines should be identified due to
485: conical singularity with the deficit angle $\delta$.}
486: \end{figure*}
487: %\begin{figure}[t]
488: %\begin{center}
489: %\epsfile{file=fig.eps,width=0.5\textwidth}
490: %\end{center}
491: %\caption{Configuration of the lensing system:
492: %The cosmic string is located parallel to the $z$ axis.
493: %This figure show a projection on the $x-y$ plane.
494: %The dashed two lines should be identified due to
495: %the conical singularity with the deficit angle $\delta$. }
496: %\label{fig1}
497: %\end{figure}
498: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
499:
500:
501: \end{document}
502: %
503: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
504: