1: % article for New Astronomy
2:
3: \documentclass{elsart}
4:
5: % the harvard package allows Harvard style referencing
6: \usepackage{harvard}
7:
8: % if you use PostScript figures in your article
9: % use the graphics package for simple commands
10: \usepackage{graphics}
11: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands
14: \usepackage{epsfig}
15:
16: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols
17: \usepackage{amssymb}
18:
19: % definitions for astronomical objects, hyperlinks and ADS bibcodes
20: \def\astrobj#1{#1}
21: \def\url#1{{\ttfamily\def\/{/\discretionary{}{}{}}#1}}
22: \def\bibcode#1{(\texttt{#1})}
23:
24: \def\gal{{\rm gal}}
25: \def\gas{{\rm gas}}
26: \def\sasz{{\tt SASZ~{}}}
27: \def\aap{A\&A}
28: \def\apj{ApJ}
29: \def\apjs{ApJS}
30: \def\prd{PRD}
31: \def\apjl{ApJL}
32: \def\mnras{MNRAS}
33: \def\aj{AJ}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \begin{frontmatter}
38: \title{Extraction of cluster parameters from Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect observations with simulated annealing optimization}
39: \author{Steen H. Hansen}
40: \address{University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190,
41: 8057 Zurich, Switzerland}
42: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes:
43: % \title{\thanksref{label1}}
44: % \thanks[label1]{}
45: % \author{\thanksref{label2}}
46: % \thanks[label2]{}
47: % \address{\thanksref{label3}}
48: % \thanks[label3]{}
49: % including your email address
50: % \address{\thanksref{email}}
51: % \thanks[email]{E-mail: }
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54: We present a user-friendly tool for the analysis of data
55: from Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect observations. The tool is based on the
56: stochastic method of simulated annealing, and allows the extraction of
57: the central values and error-bars of the 3 SZ parameters,
58: Comptonization parameter, $y$, peculiar velocity, $v_p$, and electron
59: temperature, $T_e$. The f77-code \sasz will allow any number of
60: observing frequencies and spectral band shapes.
61: As an example we consider the SZ parameters for the COMA cluster.
62: %, and is easily extended to include other physical parameters.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: %\begin{keyword}
66: % keywords here, in the form keyword \sep keyword
67: % PACS code here, in the form \PACS code \sep code
68: %Intergalactic medium -- Galaxies: cluster: general
69: %\PACS 95.75.Pq \sep 98.65.Cw
70: %\end{keyword}
71: \end{frontmatter}
72:
73: % main text
74:
75:
76: \section{Introduction\label{sec:intro}}
77:
78: Galaxy clusters typically have temperatures of the order keV, $T_e =
79: 1-15$ keV, and a CMB photon which traverses the cluster and
80: happens to Compton scatter off a hot electron will therefore get increased
81: momentum. This up-scattering of CMB photons, which results in a small
82: change in the intensity of the cosmic microwave background, is known
83: as the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and was predicted just over 30 years
84: ago~\cite{sz72}. The first radiometric observations came few years
85: later~\cite{gull76,lake77}, and while recent years have seen an
86: impressive improvement in observational techniques and
87: sensitivity~\cite{laroque02,coma}, then the near future observations
88: will see another boost in sensitivity by orders of magnitude. These
89: include dedicated multi-frequency SZ observations like
90: ACT~\footnote{{\tt http://www.hep.upenn.edu/$\sim$angelica/act/act.html}}
91: and SPT~\footnote{{\tt http://astro.uchicago.edu/spt/}}.
92: The SZ effect will thus soon provide us with an
93: independent description of cluster properties, such as evolution and
94: radial profiles. For recent excellent reviews see~\cite{birk99,carl02}.
95:
96: The SZ effect is traditionally separated
97: into two components according
98: to the origin of the scattering electrons
99: \begin{eqnarray}
100: \frac{\Delta I(x)}{I_0} &=& \Delta I_{{\rm thermal}} \, (x, y, T_e)
101: + \Delta I_{{\rm kinetic}} \, (x, \tau, v_p,T_e)
102: \label{eq:deltai}
103: \\
104: &=& y \, \left( g(x)+\delta_T(x,T_e) \right)
105: - \beta \tau \, \left(h(x) + \tilde \delta_{kin} (x,T_e) \right)
106: \,, \nonumber
107: \end{eqnarray}
108: with $x = h \nu/kT_{cmb}$ and $I_0 = 2 (kT_{cmb})^3/(hc)^2$
109: where $T_{cmb} = 2.725$ K.
110: The first term on the rhs of eq.~(\ref{eq:deltai})
111: is the thermal distortion with the non-relativistic spectral shape
112: \begin{equation}
113: g(x) = \frac{x^4 \,e^x}{(e^x -1)^2} \left( x\,\frac{e^x + 1}{e^x -1} -
114: 4 \right)\,,
115: \end{equation}
116: and the magnitude is given by the Comptonization parameter
117: \begin{equation}
118: \label{eq:ygas}
119: y = \frac{\sigma_{\rm T}}{m_e \, c^2}\, \int\!\! dl\, n_{e}
120: \,kT_e \, ,
121: \end{equation}
122: where $m_e$ and $n_e$ are masses and number density of the electrons,
123: and $\sigma_T$ is the Thomson cross section.
124:
125:
126: For non-relativistic electrons one has $\delta_T(x,T_e) = 0$, but
127: for hot clusters the relativistic electrons will slightly modify
128: the thermal SZ effect~\cite{1979ApJ...232..348W}.
129: These corrections are easily
130: calculated~\cite{1995ApJ...445...33R,itohnozawa03,2000A&A...360..417E,2001ApJ...554...74D}, and can be used to measure the
131: cluster temperature purely from SZ
132: observations~\cite{2002ApJ...573L..69H}.
133: For the implementation below we will use an extension of the method
134: developed in~\citeasnoun{2003JCAP...05..007A}, using a fit to
135: the spectral shape of $\delta_T(x,T_e)$, which
136: everywhere in the range $20-900$ GHz and $T_e < 24$ keV
137: is very accurate, $| \delta^{fit}_T - \delta_T | / ( | \delta_T |
138: + |g|) < 0.005$. In the range $24 \, {\rm keV} < T_e < 100$ keV the
139: accuracy is slightly lower.
140:
141:
142: The kinetic distortions have the spectral shape
143: \begin{equation}
144: h(x) = \frac{x^4 \,e^x}{(e^x -1)^2} \, ,
145: \end{equation}
146: and the magnitude depends on $\beta = v_p/c$, the average line-of-sight streaming
147: velocity of the thermal gas (positive
148: if the gas is approaching the observer), and the Thomson optical
149: depth
150: \begin{equation}
151: \label{eq:barbeta}
152: \tau = \sigma_{\rm T_e} \int\!\! dl\, n_{e} \, .
153: \end{equation}
154: Thus, when the intra-cluster gas can be assumed isothermal one
155: has $y = \tau kT_e/(mc^2)$.
156: For large electron temperatures
157: there are also small corrections to the kinematic effect,
158: $\tilde \delta _{kin}(x,T_e)
159: \neq 0$~\cite{1998ApJ...508....1S,1998ApJ...508...17N}, an effect
160: which is negligible with present day sensitivity.
161:
162: Given the different spectral signatures of $g(x), h(x)$ and $\delta_T
163: (x,T_e)$, it is straight forward to separate the physical variables
164: $y,v_p$ and $T_e$ from sensitive multi-frequency observation.
165: However, due to the complexity of the spectral shapes, in particular of
166: $\delta_T(x,T_e)$, the parameter space spanned by $y,v_p$ and $T_e$ may
167: be non-trivial with multiple local minima in $\chi ^2$.
168: We therefore present a stochastic analysis tool \sasz
169: based on simulated annealing, which allows a safe and fast parameter
170: extraction even for such a complex parameter space.
171:
172:
173: It is worth noting that whereas we here choose to use the set of
174: cluster variables, $(y, T_e, v_p)$, which are easily understood
175: physically, then the analysis could be simplified significantly by
176: introducing a set of {\it normal} parameters whose likelihood function
177: is well-approximated by a normal
178: distribution~\cite{2002PhRvD..66f3007K,chu02}. This set of normal
179: parameters could e.g.\ be $(y, T_e, K=\tau v_p)$, which directly enter
180: in eq.~(\ref{eq:deltai}). Another set could be $(y, T_e, \tilde K=v_p
181: T_e^{-0.85})$, where $\tilde K$ enters because the cross-over frequency,
182: $\nu _0$,
183: is easily determined observationally (due to a fast variation of
184: $\Delta I(x)$) and the fact that this
185: cross-over frequency to a good approximation depends only on $T_e$ and
186: $\tilde K$
187: \begin{equation}
188: \nu _ 0 = 217.4 \, (1 + 0.0114 \, T_5) + 12 \, T_5 ^{-0.85} \,
189: v_{500} \, {\rm GHz}\, ,
190: \end{equation}
191: using $T_5 = T_e /(5 {\rm keV})$ and $v_{500} = v_p/(500 {\rm km/sec})$.
192:
193:
194: \section{Simulated annealing}
195:
196: Let us now discuss the stochastic method used
197: in \sasz.
198: The idea behind the technique of simulated annealing is as follows. If
199: a thermodynamic system is cooled down sufficiently slowly then
200: thermodynamic equilibrium will be maintained during the cooling phase.
201: When the temperature approaches zero, $T_A \rightarrow 0$, then the
202: lowest energy state of the system,
203: $E_{min}$, will be reached~\cite{1983Sci...220..671K}.
204:
205: One can use this idea to search for the minimum in the space of
206: allowed parameters, in which case the energy is replaced with
207: $E = \chi ^2$. The method is related to Monte Carlo methods,
208: because one is basically jumping randomly around in parameter space,
209: and if a given new point has lower energy (that is lower
210: $\chi_i ^2$ in our case)
211: than the previous point ($\chi ^2 _{i-1}$),
212: then this point is accepted. To ensure that a system is not trapped
213: in a local minimum there is a certain probability of keeping the new
214: point even if its energy may be larger than the previous
215: one~\cite{metropolis53}
216: \begin{displaymath}
217: P_{\rm accept} = \left\{
218: \begin{array}{ll} 1 & \, \, \, \, \, \textrm{if} \, \, \, \, \,
219: E_i \leq E_{i-1} \\
220: e^{-\left( E_i - E_{i-1} \right) /T_A} & \, \, \, \, \,
221: \textrm{if} \, \, \, \, \, E_i > E_{i-1}
222: \end{array} \right.
223: \end{displaymath}
224: and this probability, $P_{\rm accept}$,
225: will then be compared to a random number
226: between 0 and 1, to decide if the point will be kept or not.
227: The temperature of the system, $T_A$, is then slowly lowered to ensure
228: that the global minimum $\chi ^2$ is reached. We emphasize that the
229: simulated annealing temperature, $T_A$, is completely unrelated to
230: the electron temperature, $T_e$, of the galaxy cluster.
231:
232: In reality the jumping in parameter space is not completely
233: random, instead the new points are drawn according to
234: \begin{equation}
235: x_i = x_{i-1} + A_\beta \, \sqrt{\frac{T_A}{T_0}} \, ran
236: \label{eq:abeta}
237: \end{equation}
238: where $ran$ is a random number between $-1/2$ and $1/2$. The
239: size of the jump is such that initially all of parameter
240: space is easily sampled, $A_\beta \approx \left( x_{\rm max} -x_{\rm min}
241: \right)$, whereas for a cooled system only very small jumps are allowed
242: due to the $\sqrt{T_A}$ in eq.~(\ref{eq:abeta}).
243: For flat directions in parameter space (such as $T_e$ and $v_p$)
244: the coefficient in $A_\beta$ is a factor 10 larger
245: than for the dominating Comptonization parameter $y$.
246: In the first version of \sasz
247: $x$ is a 3 dimensional
248: vector, $\vec{x} = (y, T_e, v_p)$,
249: as energy we are using $E = \chi ^2$, and we allow approximately
250: 1000 random jumps at each temperature step.
251: The cooling scheme is adaptive according to how many point
252: are accepted or rejected, but can trivially be fixed to an
253: exponential cooling scheme, $T_A(j) = c \, T_A(j-1)$, where $c<1$.
254: We use $T_0=1$ and $T_{\rm final} = 10^{-12}$, and the parameter space
255: allowed is presented in Table 1.
256:
257: \hspace{0.5cm}
258:
259: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
260: \hline \hline
261: Parameter & Allowed range && Units\\ \hline
262: $log(y)$ & $-7$ & $-2$ & \\
263: $T_e$ & 0 & 100 & keV \\
264: $v_p$ & $-10^4$ & $10^4$ &km/sec \\
265: \hline \hline
266: \end{tabular}
267: \hspace{0.5 cm}
268:
269: We note that the technique of simulated annealing, which is often used
270: for problems like the travelling salesman problem, has previously been
271: used is cosmology, e.g.\ for parameter extraction from cosmic
272: microwave background radiation
273: data~\cite{1995PhRvD..52.4307K,2000PhRvD..61b3002H}.
274:
275:
276:
277: \subsection{How to use \sasz in practice?}
278: The user has a set of observing frequencies (and possibly frequency
279: bands) with corresponding SZ observations.
280: The user specifies if some of the parameters have been observed
281: with other methods; the temperature can be known to be e.g.\
282: $T_e = 12 \pm 1$ keV, or the peculiar velocity can be known e.g.\
283: $v_p = 300 \pm 500$ km/sec. The Fortran77
284: code \sasz will then stochastically analyse the parameter space (as
285: described above) and presents the central value and $1\sigma$ error-bars for
286: the cluster parameters $(y, v_p, T_e)$. The method is much faster than
287: e.g.\ the method of automatic refining grids~\cite{2003JCAP...05..007A}.
288: A user guide with examples can be downloaded
289: together with the
290: code~\footnote{{\tt http://krone.physik.unizh.ch/\~{}hansen/sz/}}. This user
291: guide also explains how to implement measured frequency band if
292: available.
293: %, and how to include other physical parameters like
294: %contamination from radio
295: %point sources or dust.
296: %~\cite{hansen.aghanim},
297: %or even grey dust~\cite{ensslin.hansen}.
298:
299:
300: \subsection{Error-bars}
301: There are two possible steps for determination of error-bars.
302: The first is a very fast Gaussian approximation,
303: and the second is a more accurate method which simultaneously
304: provides data for nice figures.
305:
306: The Gaussian estimate of the error-bars comes for free. While
307: searching for the global minimum \sasz will remember some intermediate
308: points, $\vec x_i$, and their $\chi ^2_i$. For each of the parameters,
309: e.g. $T_e$, one can consider the 2-dimensional figure $(T_e, \Delta
310: \chi^2)$, where all points lie within a quadratic curve. One can fit a
311: quadratic curve through the best fit point and any of the other
312: points. This method gives a fairly good estimate of the error-bar by
313: performing such fit for all the points and then choosing the largest
314: value. If upper and lower error-bars are different from each other,
315: then the bigger is chosen for simplicity. The code selects a certain
316: number of point for the fit, and presents automatically the error-bars
317: for the 3 SZ parameters.
318:
319: The second method is to make a grid in the parameter we are
320: interested in,
321: and then minimize over the other parameters for each point on
322: that grid. In this way one can
323: get different upper and lower error-bars more accurately. This
324: method is, however, slower because one will have to run another
325: optimization for each chosen point in the grid.
326: \sasz automatically volunteers to
327: perform such a calculation in the $2\sigma$ range found with the
328: Gaussian method or within a user-defined range.
329:
330:
331: \section{An example: COMA}
332:
333: As an example of the use of \sasz we consider the nearby cluster
334: COMA at redshift, $z=0.0231 \pm 0.0017$. This cluster has been
335: measured at 6 different frequencies, 32 GHz~\cite{herbig95},
336: 143, 214 and 272 GHz~\cite{coma}, and at 61 and 94
337: GHz~\cite{2003ApJS..148...97B}. For a thorough discussion of consistency
338: and a combined analysis see~\citeasnoun{Battistelli:2003eh}, where
339: the results are combined in their Table~1.
340:
341:
342: \begin{figure}[tbh]
343: \begin{center}
344: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm,angle=0]{ftemp.ps}
345: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm,angle=0]{fpecvel.ps}
346: \end{center}
347: \caption{Using \sasz to determine the electron temperature or
348: peculiar velocity for COMA.
349: Figure 1a shows
350: $\Delta \chi^2$ as a function of the electron temperature, $T_e$.
351: Other parameters have been maximized over. The $1\sigma$ error-bar on
352: $T_e$ (corresponding to $\Delta \chi^2 = 1$) gives $T_e < 20$ keV.
353: Figure 1b shows $\Delta \chi^2$ as a function of the peculiar velocity, $v_p$.
354: Other parameters have been maximized over. The $1\sigma$ error-bar on
355: $v_p$ (corresponding to $\Delta \chi^2 = 1$) gives $v_p = -300 \pm 500$
356: km/sec.}
357: \label{fig:coma.temp}
358: \end{figure}
359:
360: Let us first consider the effect of bandwidth on the determination of $y$.
361: We look at the
362: case where the temperature is measured,
363: $T_e = 8.25 \pm 0.10$ keV~\cite{2001A&A...365L..67A},
364: and the peculiar velocity is known,
365: $v_p = -29 \pm 299$ km/sec~\cite{2001MNRAS.321..277C}.
366: We consider 3 cases, {\bf a)} delta function for the spectral band shape,
367: {\bf b)} Gaussian shape, and {\bf c)} flat (top-hat) shape.
368: For the Gaussian and top-hat shapes we use the band widths from Table~1
369: in~\citeasnoun{Battistelli:2003eh}.
370: We find
371: {\bf a)} $log(y)=-4.081^{+ 0.047}_{-0.048}$,
372: {\bf b)} $log(y)=-4.080^{+ 0.039}_{-0.055}$, and
373: {\bf c)} $log(y)=-4.077^{+ 0.040}_{-0.054}$. We thus see, that the
374: differences between the filters have almost no effect on
375: the central value of the Comptonization parameter, and fairly small
376: effect on the error-bars of $log(y)$.
377: This is good news (and in agreement with the findings
378: of~\citeasnoun{2003ApJ...582L..63C}),
379: because the use of filters makes the computation
380: much longer since one effectively must calculate at many more
381: frequencies.
382: Leaving $v_p$ as a free parameter to be maximized over
383: has little effect, but leaving
384: $T_e$ as a completely free parameter instead will increase the error-bars
385: on $log(y)$ by almost $50\%$.
386:
387:
388: Using Gaussian filters and assuming the peculiar velocity is measured,
389: $v_p = -29 \pm 299$ km/sec~\cite{2001MNRAS.321..277C}, one finds that COMA
390: has a temperature of $T_e = 6.6 \pm 13$ keV, as seen on figure~1a.
391: This is in good agreement with the X-ray determination, but still
392: with much larger error-bars. In comparison, the first cluster temperature
393: measurement using purely the SZ observations gave $T_e = 26 ^{+34}_{-19}$
394: keV for A2163~\cite{2002ApJ...573L..69H}, where only observations at
395: 4 frequencies were available.
396: Similarly, using the observed temperature,
397: $T_e = 8.25 \pm 0.10$ keV~\cite{2001A&A...365L..67A},
398: one finds the peculiar velocity
399: $v_p = -300 \pm 500$ km/sec, as seen on figure~1b, which is in good
400: agreement with the findings of ~\citeasnoun{2001MNRAS.321..277C}.
401:
402: %\begin{figure}[tbh]
403: %\begin{center}
404: %\includegraphics[width=4.5cm,angle=0]{fpecvel.ps}
405: %\end{center}
406: %\caption{Using \sasz to determine the peculiar velocity for COMA.
407: %The figure shows $\Delta \chi^2$ as a function of the peculiar velocity, $v_p$.
408: %Other parameters have been maximized over. The $1\sigma$ error-bar on
409: %$v_p$ (corresponding to $\Delta \chi^2 = 1$) gives $v_p = -300 \pm 500$
410: %km/sec.}
411: %\label{fig:coma.pev.vel}
412: %\end{figure}
413:
414: \section{Conclusion}
415: We are presenting a user-friendly tool for parameter extraction from
416: Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect observations. The tool \sasz is based on
417: the stochastic method of simulated
418: annealing, and is useful for any number of observing frequencies and
419: any spectral band shape. The first version of the tool allows a
420: determination of the Comptonization parameter, $y$, the peculiar
421: velocity, $v_p$, and the electron temperature, $T_e$.
422: The f77 code \sasz can
423: be readily downloaded together with a user guide with
424: examples from\\
425: {\tt http://krone.physik.unizh.ch/\~{}hansen/sz/} .
426:
427:
428:
429: %\del{
430: \section*{Acknowledgements}
431: It is a pleasure to thank Sergio Pastor and Dima Semikoz
432: for collaboration on the fitting formulae, and Nabila Aghanim
433: for discussions and pointing me towards the data from COMA.
434:
435: %}
436:
437: %\appendix
438:
439: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
440:
441: \harvarditem{Aghanim et al.}{2003}{2003JCAP...05..007A}
442: %\bibitem{2003JCAP...05..007A}
443: %[Aghanim, Hansen, Pastor, \& Semikoz(2003)]
444: Aghanim, N., Hansen, S.~H., Pastor, S., \& Semikoz, D.~V.\ 2003,
445: Journal of
446: Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, 5, 7
447: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0212392;%%
448:
449: %\bibitem[Arnaud et al.(2001)]
450: \harvarditem{Arnaud et al.}{2001}{2001A&A...365L..67A}
451: Arnaud, M.~et al.\ 2001,
452: \aap, 365, L67
453:
454: %\bibitem[Battistelli et al.(2003)]
455: \harvarditem{Battistelli et al.}{2003}{Battistelli:2003eh}
456: Battistelli, E.~S.~ {\it et al.} 2003,
457: %``Triple Experiment Spectrum of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect in the Coma Cluster: H_0,''
458: arXiv:astro-ph/0303587
459: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0303587;%%
460:
461: %\bibitem[Bennett et al.(2003)]
462: \harvarditem{Bennett et al.}{2003}{2003ApJS..148...97B}
463: Bennett, C.~L.~et al.\
464: 2003, \apjs, 148, 97
465:
466: \harvarditem{Birkinshaw}{1999}{birk99}
467: Birkinshaw, M. 1999,
468: %``The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect,''
469: Phys.\ Rept., 310, 97
470: %[arXiv:astro-ph/9808050].
471: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9808050;%%
472:
473: \harvarditem{Carlstrom, Holder \& White}{2002}{carl02}
474: Carlstrom, J.~E., Holder, G.~P., \& Reese, E.~D. 2002,
475: %``Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect,''
476: Ann.\ Rev.\ Astron.\ Astrophys., 40, 643
477: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0208192].
478: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0208192;%%
479:
480: \harvarditem{Chu, Kaplinghat \& Knox}{2003}{chu02}
481: Chu, M. Kaplinghat, M., \& Knox, L. 2003,
482: %``Normal Parameters for Super-Radical Compression of CMB Data,''
483: arXiv:astro-ph/0212466
484: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0212466;%%
485:
486: %\bibitem[Church, Knox, \& White(2003)]
487: \harvarditem{Church, Knox, \& White}{2003}{2003ApJ...582L..63C}
488: Church, S.,
489: Knox, L., \& White, M.\ 2003, \apjl, 582, L63
490:
491: %\bibitem[Colless et al.(2001)]
492: \harvarditem{Colless et al}{2001}{2001MNRAS.321..277C}
493: Colless, M., Saglia,
494: R.~P., Burstein, D., Davies, R.~L., McMahan, R.~K., \& Wegner, G.\ 2001,
495: \mnras, 321, 277
496:
497: %\bibitem[De Petris et al.(2002)]
498: \harvarditem{De Petris et al}{2002}{coma}
499: De Petris, M., D'Alba, L., Lamagna, L., Melchiorri, F., Orlando, A.,
500: Palladino, E., Rephaeli, Y., Colafrancesco, S., Kreysa, E. \& Signore, M.
501: 2002,
502: %MITO measurements of the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich
503: %Effect in the Coma cluster of galaxies,
504: astro-ph/0203303
505:
506: %\bibitem[Diego, Hansen, \& Silk(2003)]
507: \harvarditem{Diego, Hansen \& Silk}{2003}{2003MNRAS.338..796D}
508: Diego, J.~M., Hansen, S.~H., \& Silk, J.\ 2003, \mnras, 338, 796
509: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0207178;%%
510:
511: %\bibitem[Dolgov, Hansen, Pastor, \& Semikoz(2001)]
512: \harvarditem{Dolgov et al}{2001}{2001ApJ...554...74D}
513: Dolgov, A.~D., Hansen, S.~H., Pastor, S., \& Semikoz, D.~V.\ 2001, \apj,
514: 554, 74
515: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0010412;%%
516:
517: %\harvarditem{Ensslin \& Hansen}{2003}{ensslin.hansen}
518: %Ensslin, T. \& Hansen, S.~H. 2003, in preparation
519:
520: %\bibitem[En{\ss}lin \& Kaiser(2000)]
521: \harvarditem{Ensslin \& Kaiser}{2000}{2000A&A...360..417E}
522: En{\ss}lin,
523: T.~A.~\& Kaiser, C.~R.\ 2000, \aap, 360, 417
524:
525: %\bibitem[Gull \& Northover(1976)]
526: \harvarditem{Gull \& Northover}{1976}{gull76}
527: Gull, S. F. \& Northover, K. J. E. 1976,
528: Nature, 263, 572
529:
530: %\bibitem[Hannestad(2000)]
531: \harvarditem{Hannestad}{2000}{2000PhRvD..61b3002H}
532: Hannestad, S.\ 2000, \prd,
533: 61, 23002
534:
535: %\harvarditem{Hansen \& Aghanim}{2003}{hansen.aghanim}
536: %Hansen, S.~H. \& Aghanim, N. 2003, in preparation
537:
538: %\bibitem[Hansen, Pastor, \& Semikoz(2002)]
539: \harvarditem{Hansen, Pastor \& Semikoz}{2002}{2002ApJ...573L..69H}
540: Hansen, S.~H., Pastor, S., \& Semikoz, D.~V.\ 2002, \apjl, 573, L69
541: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0205295;%%
542:
543: %\bibitem[Herbig, Lawrence, Readhead, \& Gulkis(1995)]
544: \harvarditem{Herbig et al}{1995}{herbig95}
545: Herbig, T., Lawrence, C.~R., Readhead, A.~C.~S., \& Gulkis, S.\ 1995,
546: \apjl, 449, L5
547:
548: %\bibitem[Itoh \& Nozawa(2003)]
549: \harvarditem{Itoh \& Nozawa}{2003}{itohnozawa03}
550: Itoh, N., \& Nozawa, S. 2003, astro-ph/0307519
551:
552: %\bibitem[Kirkpatrick, Gelatt, \& Vecchi(1983)]
553: \harvarditem{Kirkpatrick, Gelatt, \& Vecchi}{1983}{1983Sci...220..671K}
554: Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.~D., \& Vecchi, M.~P.\ 1983, Science, 220, 671
555:
556: %\bibitem[Knox(1995)]
557: \harvarditem{Knox}{1995}{1995PhRvD..52.4307K}
558: Knox, L.\ 1995, \prd, 52, 4307
559:
560: %\bibitem[Kosowsky, Milosavljevic, \& Jimenez(2002)]
561: \harvarditem{Kosowsky, Milosavljevic \& Jimenez}{2002}{2002PhRvD..66f3007K}
562: Kosowsky, A., Milosavljevic, M., \& Jimenez, R.\ 2002, \prd, 66, 63007
563:
564:
565: %\bibitem[Lake \& Partridge(1977)]
566: \harvarditem{Lake \& Partridge}{1977}{lake77}
567: Lake, G \& Partridge, R. B. 1977,
568: Nature, 270, 502
569:
570: %\bibitem[Laroque et al.(2002)]
571: \harvarditem{Laroque et al.}{2002}{laroque02}
572: LaRoque, S.J. Reese, E.D., Holder, G.P., Carlstrom, J.E., Holzapfel, W.L.,
573: Joy, M. \&
574: Grego, L. 2002,
575: %The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Spectrum of Abell 2163,
576: %Astrophys. J., submitted (2002)
577: astro-ph/0204134
578: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0204134;%%
579:
580: %\bibitem[Metropolis et al.(1953)]
581: \harvarditem{Metropolis et al.}{1953}{metropolis53}
582: Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, E., \&
583: Teller, E. 1953,
584: %Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
585: J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087
586:
587: %\bibitem[Nozawa, Itoh, \& Kohyama(1998)]
588: \harvarditem{Nozawa, Itoh, \& Kohyama}{1998}{1998ApJ...508...17N}
589: Nozawa, S., Itoh, N., \& Kohyama, Y.\ 1998, \apj, 508, 17
590:
591: %\bibitem[Rephaeli(1995)]
592: \harvarditem{Rephaeli}{1995}{1995ApJ...445...33R}
593: Rephaeli, Y.\ 1995, \apj, 445, 33
594:
595: %\bibitem[Sazonov \& Sunyaev(1998)]
596: \harvarditem{Sazonov \& Sunyaev}{1998}{1998ApJ...508....1S}
597: Sazonov, S.~Y.~\& Sunyaev, R.~A.\ 1998, \apj, 508, 1
598:
599: %\bibitem[Sunyaev \& Zeldovich(1972)]
600: \harvarditem{Sunyaev \& Zeldovich}{1972}{sz72}
601: Sunyaev, R. A. \& Zel'dovich, Ya. B. 1972,
602: Comments Astrophys.\ Space Phys., 4 173
603:
604: %\bibitem[Wright(1979)]
605: \harvarditem{Wright}{1979}{1979ApJ...232..348W}
606: Wright, E.~L.\ 1979, \apj, 232, 348
607:
608:
609: % The phrase \cite{Bai92} produces (Bailyn 1992).
610: % In the phrase \citeasnoun{Bai95} Bailyn et al. (1995) appear as a noun.
611: % Affixes (e.g. Barnes et al. 1976) are produced by the phrase
612: % \citeaffixed{Barnes et al. 1976}{e.g.}.
613: % Other options of the harvard package, e.g. \citeyear, are not
614: % reproduced in New Astronomy.
615:
616: %\harvarditem{Author}{year}{label}Reference
617:
618: \end{thebibliography}
619:
620: \end{document}
621:
622:
623:
624:
625: