1: %\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1996/06/01]
2: %\documentclass[cup6b,epsf]{cupbook}
3: %\documentclass[cup6b]{cupbook}
4: \documentclass{caps}
5: \usepackage{peter}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \usepackage{epsf}
8: \def\note #1]{{\bf #1]}}
9: \def\note #1]{{\bf #1]}}
10: \def\dd{{\rm d}}
11: \def\be{{\bf e}}
12: \def\bu{{\bf u}}
13: \def\bx{{\bf x}}
14: \def\CK{{\cal K}}
15: \def\rt{r_{\rm t}}
16: \def\PP{{\cal P}}
17: \def\Eq #1{Eq.\ (\ref{#1})}
18: %\setcounter{chapter}{4}
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \author{David Branch\\ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University
22: of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA}
23:
24: \chapter{Type Ia supernovae: spectroscopic surprises}
25:
26: {\it Recent observations have extended the range of diversity among
27: spectra of Type~Ia supernovae. I briefly discuss SN~Ia explosion
28: models in the spectroscopic context, the observed diversity, and some
29: recent results obtained with the {\bf Synow} code for one normal and
30: two peculiar SNe~Ia. Relating the observational manifestations of
31: diversity to their physical causes is looking like an ever more
32: challenging problem.}
33:
34: \section{Introduction}
35:
36: ``Surprises'' refers not only to some recent developments in Type~Ia
37: supernova (SN~Ia) spectroscopy that will be discussed below, but also
38: to additional recent discoveries that I will be able only to mention,
39: such as the polarization signal in SN~2001el (Wang et~al. 2003; see
40: also the chapter by Wang); the unusual properties of SN~2001ay (see
41: the chapter by Howell); and the circumstellar H$\alpha$ emission of
42: SN~2002ic (Hamuy et~al. 2003; see also the chapter by Hamuy). The
43: scope of this chapter is restricted to photospheric--phase optical
44: spectra. For recent results on infrared spectra see, e.g., Marion
45: et~al. (2003).
46:
47: Some background, including mention of the various kinds of SN~Ia
48: explosion models in the spectroscopic context, is in \S1.2. An
49: overview and update of the SN~Ia spectroscopic diversity is in \S1.3.
50: Some recent results from direct analysis of the spectra of three
51: events (the normal SN~1998aq and the peculiar SNe~2000cx and 2002cx),
52: obtained with the parameterized, resonance scattering code {\bf
53: Synow}, are discussed in \S1.4. The final section (\S1.5) contains
54: more questions than conclusions.
55:
56: \section{Background}
57:
58: Around the time of maximum light the optical spectrum of a normal
59: SN~Ia consists of a thermal continuum with superimposed features due
60: to lines of ions such as Si~II, S~II, Ca~II, and O~I. Ubiquitous
61: blends of Fe~II develop shortly after maximum. The features are
62: formed by resonance scattering of the photospheric continuum and have
63: P~Cygni--type profiles characteristic of expanding atmospheres.
64: Emission components peak at the rest wavelength and absorption
65: components are blueshifted according to the velocity of the matter at
66: the photosphere, ordinarily $\sim10,000$ km~s$^{-1}$.
67:
68: SNe~Ia are thought to be thermonuclear disruptions of accreting or
69: merging carbon--oxygen white dwarfs. The classic SN~Ia explosion
70: model is model~W7 of Nomoto, Thielemann, \& Yokoi (1984), a 1D model
71: that was constructed by parameterizing the speed of the nuclear
72: burning front. Because the speed remained subsonic, W7 is known as a
73: deflagration model (but see below). The composition structure of W7
74: is radially stratified, with a low-velocity ($<10,000$ km~s$^{-1}$)
75: $\sim$1~M$_\odot$ core of iron-peak elements (initially mostly
76: radioactive $^{56}$Ni), surrounded by $\sim$0.3~M$_\odot$ of
77: intermediate-mass elements such as silicon, sulfur, and oxygen
78: expanding at $\sim10,000$ to $\sim15,000$ km~s$^{-1}$, capped by
79: $\sim$0.1~M$_\odot$ of unburned carbon and oxygen moving at
80: $\sim15,000$ to $\sim22,000$ km~s$^{-1}$. Synthetic-spectrum
81: calculations of various levels of complexity (Branch et~al. 1985;
82: Wheeler \& Harkness 1990; Nugent et~al. 1995; Salvo et~al. 2001; Lentz
83: et~al. 2001a) have shown that the spectra of W7, with or without
84: mixing of the layers above $\sim8000$ km~s$^{-1}$, generally resemble
85: the observed spectra of normal SNe~Ia. Recent detailed calculations
86: with the {\bf Phoenix} code indicate that spectra of model~W7 begin to
87: differ from observed spectra after maximum light (Lentz et~al. 2001a),
88: and that they may fail to quantitatively reproduce the dependence of
89: the $R(Si~II)$ parameter on temperature (S.~Bongard et~al., in
90: preparation). Nevertheless, there seems to be something right about
91: the basic composition structure of W7: an iron--peak core surrounded
92: by lighter elements.
93:
94: In 1D delayed--detonation models (Khokhlov 1991) the subsonic
95: deflagration makes a transition to a supersonic detonation when the
96: burning front reaches a transition density that is treated as a free
97: parameter. Composition structures of 1D delayed--detonations are not
98: extremely different from that of model~W7. The main differences are
99: in the outer, high--velocity layers, because in delayed--detonations
100: the burning front extends farther into the outer layers of the white
101: dwarf and leaves less unburned carbon than W7. [A nice comparison of
102: the composition structures of W7 and a 1D delayed--detonation can be
103: found in Sorokina et~al. (2000).] H\"oflich and colleagues (e.g.,
104: H\"oflich 1995; H\"oflich, Wheeler, \& Thielemann 1998; Wheeler
105: et~al. 1998; see also the chapter by H\"oflich) have maintained that
106: spectra of delayed--detonation models agree well with the observed
107: spectra of normal SNe~Ia.
108:
109: Only recently have 3D deflagrations been calculated (Khokhlov 2000;
110: Gamezo et~al. 2003; see also the chapter by Gamezo, Khokhlov, \& Oran
111: and references therein). The composition structure of the 3D
112: deflagration presented by Khokhlov and Gamezo et~al. is quite unlike
113: that of a 1D deflagration. The 3D model contains clumps of iron--peak
114: elements surrounded by shells of intermediate--mass elements, all
115: embedded in a substrate of unburned carbon and oxygen. The
116: angle--averaged composition is {\sl not} strongly radially stratified;
117: in fact, unburned carbon is present all the way to the center.
118: Although the model has not yet been evolved to homologous expansion,
119: it is unlikely that it will be compatible with the observed spectra
120: of normal SNe~Ia. The presence of unburned carbon at low velocity may
121: not be a problem during the first months after explosion (Baron
122: et~al. 2003; see also the chapter by Lentz), but a strong argument can
123: be made for a smooth distribution of silicon in normal SNe~Ia in order
124: to consistently produce the deep 6100~\AA\ absorption (Thomas
125: et~al. 2002; see also the chapter by Thomas). The 3D model also would
126: produce [C~II] and [O~I] lines in the nebular phase (C.~Kozma et~al.,
127: in preparation), which are not observed. However, some future 3D
128: deflagration models may be different: much may depend, for example, on
129: whether the deflagration originates at a single point or practically
130: simultaneously at several or even a multitude of points.
131:
132: In the chapter by Gamezo et~al. a 3D {\sl delayed--detonation} model
133: is discussed, in which the composition structure {\sl is} radially
134: stratified, rather like 1D explosion models. If the composition
135: structures of future 3D deflagrations continue to be very different
136: from that of model~W7, perhaps W7 should be referred to as a
137: parameterized 1D model, rather than as a deflagration, because its
138: composition structure may be more like 3D delayed--detonations.
139:
140: The effects on explosion models of rapid rotation of the white--dwarf
141: progenitors (Uenishi et~al. 2003; see also the chapter by Yoon and
142: Langer) has not yet begun to be taken into account.
143:
144: \section{Spectroscopic diversity}
145:
146: Nugent et~al. (1995) showed that retaining the composition structure
147: of model~W7 and varying the temperature produced a sequence of
148: synthetic spectra that resembled a sequence of observed SN~Ia spectra
149: ranging from the peculiar powerful SN~1991T, with its high--excitation
150: Fe~III features, through the normals, to the peculiar weak SN~1991bg,
151: with its low--excitation Ti~II features. Quantitatively, the sequence
152: was arranged according to increasing values of the parameter
153: $R(Si~II)$, the ratio of the depth of an absorption feature near
154: 5700~\AA\ to the depth of the deeper absorption near 6100~\AA\ that is
155: primarily due to Si~II $\lambda$6355. [The major contributors to the
156: 5700~\AA\ aborption remain uncertain (Garnavich et~al. 2001,
157: S.~Bongard et~al., in preparation)]. As shown by Nugent et~al. (1995),
158: Garnavich et~al. (200?), and Benetti et~al. (2003), the $R(Si~II)$
159: parameter correlates with the light--curve decline--rate parameter
160: $\Delta m_{15}$ of Phillips (1993).
161:
162: But it has become well known that not all SNe~Ia can be forced into a
163: single spectroscopic sequence. Events such as SN~1984A have the same
164: spectral features as normal SNe~Ia but higher expansion velocities at
165: a given epoch. I will refer to the most extreme of these as HPV (high
166: photospheric velocity) SNe~Ia. Lentz et~al. (2001b) found that
167: certain delayed--detonation models, with their high densities in the
168: high--velocity ($\sim20,000$ km~s$^{-1}$) layers, were able to account
169: well for the spectra of SN~1984A. The HPV SNe~Ia have high values of
170: the $V_{10}(Si~II)$ parameter --- the velocity corresponding to the
171: blueshift of the Si~II $\lambda$6355 absorption at 10~days after
172: maximum light (Branch \& van den Bergh 1993). Hatano et~al. (2000)
173: presented a plot of $R(Si~II)$ against $V_{10}(Si~II)$ to illustrate
174: the extent to which some events having similar values of $R(Si~II)$
175: have different values of $V_{10}(Si~II)$. Hatano et~al. suggested
176: that it may be useful to think of $R(Si~II)$ (like $\Delta m_{15}$) as
177: a measure of the ejected nickel mass and $V_{10}(Si~II)$ as a measure
178: of the density in the high--velocity layers --- whether the high
179: density actually is produced by a delayed detonation or not.
180: Similarly, one can plot $\Delta m_{15}$ against $V_{10}(Si~II)$, as in
181: Fig.~1. Plotting $\Delta m_{15}$ allows some interesting events for
182: which $R(Si~II)$ is unavailable to be included. The dashed line
183: serves to represent the Nugent ``temperature'' sequence connecting the
184: peculiar SN~1991bg to the peculiar SN~1991T via the normal SN~1994D (a
185: different normal event, e.g., SNe~1989B, 1996X, or SN~1998bu, could
186: just as well have been chosen). SN~2001ay, an HPV event with a very
187: slow postmaximum light--curve decline (see the chapter by Howell) and
188: SN~2002cx (Li et~al. 2003) have extended the observed range of $\Delta
189: m_{15}$ and $V_{10}(Si~II)$, respectively, and the value of
190: $V_{10}(Si~II)$ plotted for SN~2002cx is an upper limit because the
191: Si~II absorption was seen only near maximum light.
192:
193: %Figure~\ref{fig:Dm15vsv10} write a caption
194:
195: \begin{figure}
196: %\begin{center}
197: %\leavevmode\epsfxsize=8cm, \epsfbox{branchf1.eps}
198: \includegraphics[width=8cm, angle=270]{branchf1.eps}
199: %end{center}
200: %Figure caption
201: \caption{The photometric $\Delta m_{15}$ parameter is plotted against
202: the spectroscopic $V_{10}(Si~II)$ parameter. Open circles mean that
203: the value of $\Delta m_{15}$ has been estimated from the observed
204: value of the $R(Si~II)$ parameter. The dashed line is intended to
205: represent the temperature sequence of Nugent et~al. (1995).}
206: %\label{fig:Dm15vsv10}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: \section{Recent results with {\bf Synow}}
210:
211: The spectroscopically normal SN~1998aq was thoroughly observed by the
212: CfA group. In Fig.~1 it falls in a region heavily populated by
213: normals. One result of a recent direct analysis of the
214: photospheric--phase spectra with the {\bf Synow} code (Branch
215: et~al. 2003) was good evidence for the presence of C~II lines
216: indicating the presence of carbon at velocities at least as low as
217: 11,000 km~s$^{-1}$. Mazzali (2000) identified the same lines, but at
218: higher velocity, $\sim16,000$ km~s$^{-1}$, in the normal SN~1990N.
219: Carbon as slow as 11,000 km~s$^{-1}$ would be inconsistent with
220: published 1D delayed--detonation models. Most of the other spectral
221: features in the early spectra were securely identified, making
222: SN~1998aq a useful benchmark for comparison with other SNe~Ia.
223:
224: SN~2000cx was extensively observed by Li et~al. (2002), who referred
225: to it as uniquely peculiar. In Figure~1 it falls among the normals,
226: but the unusual properties discovered by Li et~al. included a lopsided
227: $B$--band light curve --- quick to rise but slow to fall --- and a
228: strange $B - V$ color evolution --- from redder than normal before
229: maximum to bluer than normal after maximum. The many spectral
230: peculiarities included Ca~II infrared--triplet absorptions forming not
231: only at the photospheric velocity of $\sim10,000$ km~s$^{-1}$ but also
232: at much higher velocity, greater than 20,000 km~s$^{-1}$. Thomas et
233: al. (2003) investigated the high--velocity Ca~II features with a
234: parameterized 3D spectrum--synthesis code and concluded that they
235: probably formed in a nonspherical high--velocity structure that
236: partially covered the photosphere. Kasen et~al. (2003) already had
237: reached a similar conclusion for the high--velocity Ca~II features
238: discovered by Wang et~al. (2003) in SN~2001el, for which polarization
239: measurements clearly indicated a strong departure from spherical
240: symmetry in the high--velocity matter. I will refer to features like
241: these as DHVFs (detached high velocity features). Direct analysis of
242: the photospheric--phase spectra of SN~2000cx with {\bf Synow}
243: (D.~Branch et~al., in preparation) reveals that in the blue, the
244: spectra were composite, containing some features forming just above
245: the photospheric velocity, but also containing additional DHVFs
246: forming at the same high velocity as the Ca~II DHVFs. In particular,
247: blends of Ti~II HDVFs suppressed the spectrum in the blue (see
248: Figure~2). The flux blocking by Ti~II HDVFs decreased with time,
249: which is in the right sense to cause the $B$--band light curve to rise
250: more quickly and fall more slowly than it otherwise would have done,
251: and to cause the peculiar $B - V$ evolution. Quantitative evaluation
252: of the effects of line blocking by DHVFs forming in an asymmetric
253: matter distribution will require 3D spectrum calculations such as
254: those of Thomas et~al. (2003). In any case, as an extreme case of
255: DHVFs SN~2000cx shows the importance of learning how much of the SN~Ia
256: spectroscopic and photometric diversity is caused by DHVFs.
257:
258: SN~2000cx spectra contained a distinct, persistent absorption feature
259: near 4530~\AA\ for which the most plausible identification that we
260: (Thomas et~al. 2003 and Branch et~al., in preparation) can suggest is
261: an H$\beta$ ($\lambda$4861) DHVF, blueshifted by the same high
262: velocity as the Ca~II and Ti~II DHVFs. At this blueshift the
263: H$\alpha$ absorption happens to fall within the red Si~II absorption.
264: As discussed by Thomas et~al. and Branch et~al., if H$\alpha$ and
265: P$\alpha$ are confined to a clump in front of the photosphere and
266: have source functions that are elevated relative to the
267: resonance--scattering source function (as they generally do in
268: SNe~II), then they could be difficult to see. In principle their
269: spectroscopic signatures even could vanish. The H$\beta$
270: identification remains tentative, however, because there is no
271: independent evidence for the presence of hydrogen.
272:
273: %Figure~\ref{fig:TiII} write a caption
274:
275: \begin{figure}
276: %begin{center}
277: %leavevmode\epsfxsize=8cm \epsfbox{branchf2.eps}
278: \includegraphics[width=8.cm, angle=270]{branchf2.eps}
279: %end{center}
280: %igure caption
281: \caption{ Two synthetic spectra having $v_{phot}=11,000$ km~s$^{-1}$
282: and containing only Ti~II lines are compared. One spectrum (dashed
283: line) contains only undetached lines and has features like those seen
284: in the peculiar SN~1991bg. The other spectrum (thick solid line)
285: contains only lines detached at 23,000 km~s$^{-1}$, as required to fit
286: the spectrum of the peculiar SN~2000cx. The $B$--band filter function
287: also is shown (thin solid line). }
288: %\label{fig:TiII}
289: \end{figure}
290:
291: SN~2002cx was just as surprising as SN~2000cx. Li et~al. (2003)
292: observed SN~2002cx and referred to it as the ``most peculiar''
293: SN~Ia. Near maximum its spectra first contained features of Fe~III;
294: Fe~II features developed later. Despite the fact that Si~II and S~II
295: features apparently were not present, Li et~al. argued that SN~2002cx
296: should be regarded as a Type~Ia --- the first one observed to be blue,
297: yet subluminous. At maximum light the velocity at the photosphere was
298: only 7000 km~s$^{-1}$, making it the first good example of an LPV
299: ({\sl low} photospheric velocity) SN~Ia. Li et~al. called attention
300: to mysterious emission lines in the red part of spectra obtained three
301: weeks postmaximum, and to what appeared to be an unusually early
302: appearance of nebular emission lines two months postmaximum. The
303: early development of the nebular phase was taken as an indication that
304: the mass ejection may have been sub--Chandraskhar. Direct analysis
305: with {\bf Synow} (D. Branch et~al., in preparation) clarifies some of
306: these issues. At maximum light the spectrum contained not only Fe~III
307: features but also weak features of Si~III, Si~II, and S~II ---
308: confirming the Type~Ia classification. The spectrum also contained
309: Fe~II and Ca~II DHVFs forming at about 14,000 km~s$^{-1}$. The {\bf
310: Synow} analysis reveals that in the spectrum several weeks postmaximum
311: the mysterious emission lines in the red actually are blends of
312: P~Cygni features of permitted Fe~II and Co~II lines (see Figure~3),
313: and that the spectrum two months postmaximum had not gone nebular ---
314: it was much like the two--week postmaximum spectrum, but with stronger
315: Fe~II and weaker Co~II. SN~2002cx raises several interesting
316: questions. For example, if the ejected composition was dominated by
317: iron--peak elements, the kinetic energy per unit mass should have been
318: high, so why were the velocities low? And if the mass ejection was
319: Chandraskhar, why was the luminosity low? One possibility (see the
320: chapter by Kasen) is that SN~2002cx was a low--luminosity
321: SN~1991bg--like event, viewed right down the hole in the ejecta caused
322: by the presence of the donor star (Marietta, Burrows, \& Fryxell
323: 2000).
324:
325: %Figure~\ref{fig:02cx} write a caption
326:
327: \begin{figure}
328: %begin{center}
329: %leavevmode\epsfxsize=8cm \epsfbox{branchf3.eps}
330: \includegraphics[width=8.cm, angle=270]{branchf3.eps}
331: %end{center}
332: %Figure caption
333: \caption{A synthetic spectrum of having $v_{phot}=7000$ km~s$^{-1}$
334: and dominated by strong permitted resonance scattering features of
335: Fe~II and Co~II (dotted line) is compared with a spectrum of the
336: peculiar SN~2002cx obtained by Li et~al. (2003) 25 days after
337: maximum light (solid line).
338: }
339: %\label{fig:02cx}
340: \end{figure}
341:
342: \section{Questions}
343:
344: Thinking of $R(Si~II)$ as a measure of the nickel mass and of
345: $V_{10}(Si~II)$ as a measure of the density at high velocity may be a
346: useful way to think about the diversity, but clearly it is not enough.
347: Some of the diversity is produced by DHVFs, which we now recognize to
348: be not uncommon in SNe~Ia. Weak DHVFs such as those of SN~1994D
349: (Hatano et~al 1999) may be caused by radial ionization variations in
350: smooth ejecta density distributions (H\"oflich et al. 1998; Lentz
351: et~al. 2001a), but what is the origin of the stronger DHVFs --- those
352: that appear to require density enhancements at high velocity? The
353: most extreme case so far is SN~2000cx with its strong Ti~II DHVFs.
354: The DHVFs of SNe~2001el and 2000cx appear to be in asymmetric matter
355: distributions. Are they a consequence of asymmetric matter ejection?
356:
357: Has an H$\beta$ DHVF been detected in SN~2000cx? If so, at least some
358: of the matter producing the DHVFs of SN~2000cx must have come from a
359: nondegenerate companion star. Do any other SNe~Ia also show H$\beta$
360: DHVFs, at less noticeable levels? Gerardy et~al. (2003) suggest that
361: strong DHVFs are produced by high--velocity density enhancements owing
362: to interaction with solar--abundance circumstellar matter. If this is
363: correct, then it may be DHVFs, rather than narrow H$\alpha$ emission
364: or absorption, that are the first to reveal the presence of the
365: long--sought circumstellar matter associated with SN~Ia
366: single--degenerate progenitor systems.
367:
368: Events such as SNe~2001ay, 2002cx, and 2002ic seem, so far, to be
369: peculiar each in their own way. As mentioned above, the effects of
370: the Marietta et~al. hole in the ejecta may be responsible for some of
371: the peculiarities of SN~2002cx, as well as some of the other SN~Ia
372: diversity (see the chapter by Kasen). SN~2002ic (Hamuy et~al. 2003;
373: see also the chapter by Hamuy) evidently is a very special case, since
374: it shows a clear signature of circumstellar hydrogen to a degree that
375: would not have been missed in spectra of previously observed SNe~Ia.
376: Note that the characteristic velocity of the H$\alpha$ emission of
377: SN~2002ic, $\sim1800$ km~s$^{-1}$, is much lower than the velocity of
378: the H$\beta$ DHVF tentatively identified in SN~2000cx ($\sim23,000$
379: km~s$^{-1}$).
380:
381: Learning how to relate the various manifestations of observational
382: diversity --- the range of $R(Si~II)$ and $V_{10}(Si~II)$ values, the
383: DHVFs, and the individually peculiar events --- to their physical
384: causes --- e.g., nickel mass, flame propagation, asymmetric ejection,
385: asymmetric circumstellar interaction, looking down the hole --- is
386: looking like an increasingly challenging problem.
387:
388:
389: \bigskip\noindent {\it Acknowledgements:} I have had the benefit of
390: many discussions of these matters with Eddie Baron, Peter H\"oflich,
391: Dan Kasen, Peter Nugent, and Rollin Thomas. It is a pleasure to take
392: this opportunity to thank Craig Wheeler for all he has done to make
393: supernova research so interesting and enjoyable.
394:
395: \begin{thereferences}{99}
396:
397: \makeatletter
398: \renewcommand{\@biblabel}[1]{\hfill}
399:
400: \bibitem[]{}
401: Baron, E., Lentz, E. J., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2003, ApJ, 588, L29
402: \bibitem[]{}
403: Benetti, S., et al. 2003, MNRAS, in press
404: \bibitem[]{}
405: Branch, D., Doggett, J. B., Nomoto, K., \& Thielemann, F.-K. 1985,
406: ApJ, 294, 619
407: \bibitem[]{}
408: Branch, D., \& van den Bergh, S. 1993, AJ, 105, 2231
409: \bibitem[]{}
410: Branch, D., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1489
411: \bibitem[]{}
412: Gamezo, V. N., Khokhlov, A. M., Oran, E. S., Chtchelkanova,~A.~Y., \&
413: Rosenberg,~R.~O. 2003, Science, 299, 77
414: \bibitem[]{}
415: Garnavich, P., et al. 2001, astro-ph/0105490
416: \bibitem[]{}
417: Gerardy, C. L., et al. 2003, ApJ, submitted
418: \bibitem[]{}
419: Hamuy, M., et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 651
420: \bibitem[]{}
421: Hatano, K., Branch, D., Lentz, E. J., Baron,~E., Filippenko,~A.~V.,
422: \& Garnavich,~P.~M. 2000, ApJ, 543, L49
423: \bibitem[]{}
424: Hatano, K., Branch, D., Fisher, A., Baron,~E., \&
425: Filippenko,~A.~V. 1999, ApJ, 525, 881
426: \bibitem[]{}
427: H\"oflich, P. 1995, ApJ, 443, 831
428: \bibitem[]{}
429: H\"oflich, P., Wheeler, J. C., \& Thielemann, F.-K. 1998, ApJ, 495, 617
430: \bibitem[]{}
431: Kasen, D., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 788
432: \bibitem[]{}
433: Khokhlov, A. M. 1991, A\&A, 245, 114
434: \bibitem[]{}
435: Khokhlov, A. M. 2000, astro-ph/0008463
436: \bibitem[]{}
437: Lentz, E. J., Baron, E., Branch, D., \& Hauschildt,~P.~H. 2001b,
438: ApJ, 547, 402
439: \bibitem[]{}
440: Lentz, E. J., Baron, E., Branch, D., \& Hauschildt,~P.~H. 2001a, ApJ,
441: 557, 266
442: \bibitem[]{}
443: Li, W., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 453
444: \bibitem[]{}
445: Li, W., et al. 2002, PASP, 113, 1178
446: \bibitem[]{}
447: Marion, G. H., H\"oflich, P., Vacca, W. D., \& Wheeler,~J.~C. 2003
448: ApJ, 591, 316
449: \bibitem[]{}
450: Marietta, E., Burrows, A., \& Fryxell, B. 2000, ApJS, 128, 615
451: \bibitem[]{}
452: Mazzali, P. A., 2001, MNRAS, 321, 341
453: \bibitem[]{}
454: Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F.-K., \& Yokoi,~K., 1984, ApJ, 286, 644
455: \bibitem[]{}
456: Nugent, P., Phillips, M. M., Baron, E., Branch,~D., \& Hauschildt,~P.
457: 1995, ApJ, 455, L147
458: \bibitem[]{}
459: Phillips, M. M. 1993, ApJ, 413, L105
460: \bibitem[]{}
461: Salvo, M. E., Capppellaro, E., Mazzali, P. A., Benetti, S.,
462: Danziger,~I.~J., Patat,~F. \& Turatto,~M. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 254
463: \bibitem[]{}
464: Sorokina, E. I., Blinnikov, S. I., \& Bartunov, O. S. 2000,
465: Astr. Let. 26, 67
466: \bibitem[]{}
467: Thomas, R. C., Branch, D., Baron, E., Nomoto, K., Li,~W.,
468: \& Filippenko,~A.~V. 2003, ApJ, in press
469: \bibitem[]{}
470: Thomas, R. C., Kasen, D., Branch, D., \& Baron, E.
471: 2002 ApJ, 567, 1037
472: \bibitem[]{}
473: Uenishi, T., Nomoto, K., \& Hachisu, I. 2003, ApJ, 595, 1094
474: \bibitem[]{}
475: Wang, L., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1110
476: \bibitem[]{}
477: Wheeler, J. C., H\"oflich, P., Harkness, R. P., \&
478: Spyromilio,~J. 1998, ApJ, 496, 908
479: \bibitem[]{}
480: Wheeler, J. C., \& Harkness, R. P. 1990, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 1467
481:
482:
483:
484: \end{thereferences}
485:
486: \end{document}
487: