1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \newcommand{\Nh}{\mbox{$N_{H}$}}
3: \newcommand{\La}{\mbox{${\rm Ly\alpha}$}}
4: \newcommand{\Hb}{\mbox{${\rm H\beta}$}}
5: \newcommand{\Line}[3]{\Ion{#1}{#2}\,$\lambda$\,#3}
6: \newcommand{\Lines}[3]{\Ion{#1}{#2}\,$\lambda\lambda$\,#3}
7: \newcommand{\Ion}[2]{#1{\,\footnotesize #2}}
8: \newcommand{\Rwd}{\mbox{$R_{\rm wd}$}}
9: \newcommand{\Mwd}{\mbox{$M_{\rm wd}$}}
10: \newcommand{\Twd}{\mbox{$T_{\rm wd}$}}
11: \newcommand{\Lwd}{\mbox{$L_{\rm wd}$}}
12: \newcommand{\Rpole}{\mbox{$R_{\rm pole}$}}
13: \newcommand{\Tpole}{\mbox{$T_{\rm pole}$}}
14: \newcommand{\Ths}{\mbox{$T_{\rm HS}$}}
15: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eff}$}}
16: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$\rm M_{\odot}$}}
17: \newcommand{\Msec}{\mbox{$M_{\rm sec}$}}
18: \newcommand{\ecsa}{\mbox{$\rm ergs\;cm^{-2}s^{-1}\rm\AA^{-1}$}}
19: \newcommand{\ecs}{\mbox{$\rm ergs\;cm^{-2}s^{-1}$}}
20: \newcommand{\es}{\mbox{$\rm ergs\;s^{-1}$}}
21: \newcommand{\ec}{\mbox{$\rm ergs\;cm^{-2}$}}
22: \newcommand{\cts}{\mbox{$\rm cts\;s^{-1}$}}
23:
24: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
25: %\documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex}
26: %\documentclass{aastex}
27:
28: \shorttitle{The Cooling of WZ Sge}
29: \shortauthors{Godon et al.}
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: \title{Modeling the Heating and Cooling of WZ Sagittae
34: following the July 2001 Outburst.}
35:
36: \author{Patrick Godon$^1$, Edward M. Sion, \& Fuhua Cheng}
37: \affil{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Villanova
38: University, Villanova, PA 19085;
39: patrick.godon@villanova.edu emsion@ast.villanova.edu}
40:
41: \author{Boris T. G\"ansicke}
42: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of
43: Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ;
44: btg@astro.soton.ac.uk}
45:
46: \author{Steve Howell}
47: \affil{Institute of Geophysics \& Planetary Physics,
48: 1432 Geology Building, University of California,
49: Riverside, CA 92521;
50: steve.howell@ucr.edu}
51:
52: \author{Christian Knigge}
53: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of
54: Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ;
55: christian@astro.soton.ac.uk}
56:
57: \author{Warren M. Sparks}
58: \affil{XNH, MS F664, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
59: NM 87545; wms@lanl.gov}
60:
61: \author{Sumner Starrfield}
62: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Arizona State University,
63: Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504;
64: sumner.starrfield@asu.edu}
65:
66: \altaffiltext{2}
67: {Visiting at the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}
68:
69: \clearpage
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72:
73: FUSE and HST/STIS spectra of the dwarf nova WZ Sge, obtained
74: during and following the early superoutburst of July 2001
75: over a time span of 20 months, monitor changes
76: in the components of the system during its different phases.
77: The synthetic spectral fits to the data
78: indicate a cooling in response to the outburst of about 12,000K,
79: from $\approx 28,000K$ down to $\approx 16,000K$.
80: The cooling time scale $\tau$ (of the white dwarf temperature excess)
81: is of the order of $\approx 100 $
82: days in the early phase of the cooling period,
83: and increases to $\tau \approx 850$ days
84: toward the end of the second year following the outburst.
85:
86: In the present work, we numerically model the accretional heating
87: and subsequent cooling of the accreting white dwarf in WZ Sge.
88: The best compressional heating model fit is obtained for a
89: $1.2 M_{\odot}$ white dwarf accreting at a rate of $9 \times 10^{-9}
90: M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ for 52 days.
91: However, if one assumes a lower mass accretion rate or a lower
92: white dwarf mass, then compressional heating
93: alone cannot account for the observed temperature decline, and
94: other sources of heating have to be included to increase
95: the temperature of the model to the observed value. We quantitatively
96: check the effect of boundary layer irradiation as such an additional
97: source.
98:
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: \keywords{ Cataclysmic variables -- stars: individual (WZ Sge) -- white
102: dwarfs.}
103:
104: \section{Introduction}
105:
106: WZ Sge is a well-studied dwarf nova
107: (DN, a sub-class of Cataclysmic Variables - CVs)
108: with extreme properties. It has the largest
109: outburst amplitude, shortest orbital period, longest outburst
110: recurrence time, lowest mass Roche-lobe filling secondary,
111: and lowest
112: accretion rate of any class of DNe \citep{how99,how02}.
113: In addition it is the
114: brightest DN and arguably the closest CV,
115: with a distance of only $\approx 43$ pc (Thorstensen 2001, private
116: communication). WZ Sge was observed to go into outburst in 1913,
117: in 1946 and in 1978 and it was consequently assumed to have an outburst
118: period of about 33 years.
119: The 23 July 2001 outburst, first reported by T. Ohshima (see \citet{ish01}),
120: was therefore 10 years earlier than expected.
121:
122: Following the nomenclature of \citet{pat02},
123: the optical light curve (Figure 1)
124: of the system during the July 2001 outburst
125: exhibits a "plateau" phase (this phase is really
126: a slow decline phase), which lasted for about 24 days.
127: During this period the system brightness underwent a steady decline
128: with a rate of about 0.1 mag/day, falling from $M_v \approx 8.2$ to
129: $M_v \approx 10.7$ in about 24 days, a sign that the accretion was
130: taking place at a slowly decreasing rate.
131: It was then followed by a sharp drop (itself lasting a few days)
132: of the visual magnitude from $m_v \approx 11$ down to $m_v \approx 13$,
133: where it stayed for about 3 days: the "dip".
134: During the dip, accretion had either stopped completely or
135: dropped considerably.
136: Between day 29 and day 52 of the outburst, the system then
137: underwent 12 successive ``echo'' outbursts: the "rebrightening" phase.
138: On the 53rd day, the system started to cool without
139: any other noticeable outburst event: the "cooling" phase
140: (in Figure 1 the light curve is shown for $t<75$ days only, since
141: for $t> 53$ days $M_v$ is a monotonously decreasing function of
142: time, as the star cools). \\
143:
144: The 2001 outburst light curve of WZ Sge is remarkably similar to
145: its 1978 outburst light curve with practically the same
146: initial decline rate of 0.1mag/day
147: \citep{bai79}. However, in 1978 the plateau and
148: rebrightening phases lasted about 30 days each against 25 days each
149: in the 2001 outburst
150: (i.e. the outburst in 1978 lasted about 10 days longer than in 2001).
151: This may be related to the fact that in
152: 2001 WZ Sge erupted after only 23 years of quiescence, while in
153: 1978 it erupted after 33 years of quiescence. The
154: 2001 outburst was not as strong as in 1978.
155: From the IUE archive we found that the continuum level of the spectrum
156: has a flux density $F_{\lambda}$ (estimated around $\lambda = 1,700$ \AA\ )
157: of about $ F_{\lambda} \approx 2 \times 10^{-11}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
158: \AA $^{-1}$ during the early phase of the 1978 outburst, or about
159: 3 times larger than in the 2001 outburst
160: at the same epoch and wavelength
161: $F_{\lambda}\approx 7 \times 10^{-12}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA $^{-1}$.
162: During the cooling phase, the flux density $F_{\lambda}$ was also larger
163: in 1978 than in 2001 at the same epoch \citep{sle99}.
164: The 1946 eruption,
165: however, was much different, with no apparent rebrightening phase,
166: while the plateau phase had small amplitude variations
167: during the whole duration of the outburst. \\
168:
169: The main purpose of the present work is to
170: try to account for the observed sequence
171: of temperatures using a numerical model
172: for the accretional heating and subsequent cooling of the
173: accreting white dwarf.
174: In the next section we address the issue of the accuracy of
175: the temperature determination during the
176: outburst and cooling periods,
177: together with an overview of the estimates of the
178: WD temperature and accretion rate.
179: We present the code we use
180: to carry out the simulations of the heating and
181: cooling of the WD in section 3.
182: The results are presented in section 4.
183: In the last section we discuss the possible origin of the observed
184: high temperatures and slow cooling of the white dwarf.
185:
186: \section{The Accretion Rate and White Dwarf Temperature Determination}
187:
188:
189: In the present work we consider the observations of WZ Sge carried
190: out in the
191: Far Ultraviolet for which the temperature of the accreting white
192: dwarf and/or the mass accretion rate of the system were assessed.
193: These observations monitor changes in the FUV component of the
194: system during its different phases, over a time span of 20 months.
195: and reveal a cooling of the WD in response to the outburst of
196: about 12,000K.
197: Namely, we consider 4 FUSE and 11 HST/STIS observations as
198: follows:
199: one FUSE observation obtained during the plateau phase,
200: one HST observation obtained during the dip, two HST and one FUSE
201: observations obtained during the rebrightening phase and 2 FUSE
202: with 8 HST observations obtained during the cooling phase.
203: A total of 15 observations together with their references
204: are recapitulated in Table 1.
205:
206: In order to estimate the temperature
207: one generates a grid of theoretical spectra for different
208: values of the surface temperature, gravity and composition,
209: using the synthetic spectra generator codes TLUSTY and SYNSPEC
210: \citep{hub88,hub94,hub95}.
211: One then masks regions of the observed spectrum that are not
212: characteristic
213: of a WD atmosphere (such are emission lines for example),
214: and a $\chi^2$ fitting technique is used to find the best
215: fit model. The mass accretion rate is estimated in a similar
216: manner using different options in the synthetic spectra
217: generator codes TLUSTY (the older version is known as TLDISK)
218: and SYSNPEC.
219:
220: {\bf{Mass Accretion Rates:}}
221: the following mass accretion rates were estimated in the
222: references mentioned in Table 1 and should be considered
223: only as an order of estimate.
224: From Table 1,
225: we see that the mass accretion rate estimate during the
226: plateau phase is rather modest, of the order of
227: $1-3 \times 10^{-9}M_{\odot}/year$
228: \citep{lon03a} on day 7 into outburst (Table 1).
229: During the dip, the white dwarf
230: might have a temperature of about $25,000$K
231: \citep{kni02} on day 27.
232: This is more than $10,000K$ above its
233: quiescence temperature which is $\approx 14,500K$.
234: During the rebrightening
235: phase, the mass accretion rate seems to be somewhat smaller than during the
236: plateau and only peaks at $1\times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$
237: \citep{lon03a} on day 46.
238: We put these
239: values into the table, though we feel that they should be considered only
240: as rough estimates rather than actual values and they
241: reflect our inability to assess $\dot{M}$ (and $T_{wd}$) during this epoch.
242: This is because during the different phases of the outburst,
243: additional components (such as the
244: accretion disk and other obscuring material ejected during outburst)
245: contaminate and veil \citep{lon03b}
246: the spectrum of the white dwarf.
247: However, during the cooling phase, one expects to 'see'
248: mainly the white dwarf with little or no contribution from the disk
249: and/or other (possibly masking) additional components.
250: During this epoch the white dwarf is
251: exposed and its temperature decreases.
252:
253: Because of that, we decide to use for our modeling the values of
254: the white dwarf temperature obtained during the cooling phase
255: only. However, discrepancies of up to 5,000K exists
256: between the temperature estimates
257: of \citet{sio03} and \citet{lon03b},
258: for the observation carried out
259: on day 50, when the white dwarf was revealed, but apparently also
260: partially masked or/and possibly with an accretion disk component.
261: The rest of the observations in the cooling phase
262: are consisten within 2,000K.
263:
264: {\bf{Temperatures:}}
265: we elaborate here a little more on the temperature,
266: using the three different approaches (denoted a, b and c
267: in Table 2).
268:
269: These were all observations using HST/STIS.
270: In (a) we mask the N V region of the spectrum when needed (together with
271: less affected regions varying from spectrum to spectrum ) and use the
272: latest version of the
273: synthetic spectra generator codes TLUSTY and SYNSPEC
274: \citep{hub88,hub94,hub95}; in
275: (b) the spectral fitting technique uses the same
276: masking regions for all the spectra together with the new version
277: of the code; and (c) is taken from \citet{lon03b},
278: which uses a third and different masking technique together with
279: an earlier version of the code. In Table 2, we also list the flux
280: integrated over the wavelength over the entire spectral range of
281: STIS, to the power 1/4, for all the epochs, which is proportional to
282: the effective temperature (though each integrated flux can be relatively
283: over- or under- estimated).
284:
285: In Figure 2 we draw the temperatures listed in Table 2 as follows:
286: $T_a$ is represented by stars; $T_b$ is represented by squares;
287: $T_c$ is represented by plus signs; and the temperature estimated
288: through the flux is represented by circles, where it has been arbitrarily
289: scaled so as to fit the last data point for $T_b$. The two triangles
290: represent the FUSE data points. The September 2001 datum
291: has temperature estimates
292: ranging from $\approx 27,000$K up to $\approx 32,000$K. For that particular
293: epoch the spectrum was taken between the last two echo outbursts and
294: obviously the white dwarf was not the only component and in addition
295: might have been partially masked. For that reason we decide not to
296: take into consideration the data points that were not
297: known accurately, or which were
298: taken during periods when the white dwarf might still have been veiled.
299: In our numerical modeling we will try to model the cooling temperature
300: as listed in Table 2, with some reservations about the September 2001
301: entry.
302:
303: The cooling of the white dwarf is initially pretty rapid and then
304: slows down significantly. If we assume an exponential
305: cooling law $T = T_{inf}+\Delta T \times e^{-t/\tau}$
306: (with $T_{inf} = 14,500$K), equivalent to
307: $\Delta T(t) = \Delta T \times e^{-t/\tau}$, where
308: $\Delta T(t)$ is the excess temperature of the WD at time $t$, then
309: we find that $\tau$ is not constant, i.e. the cooling is not
310: exponential.
311: In Tables 1 and 2, $t$ is counted from the begining of the cooling period,
312: day 52 into outburst, however, it is usually agreed to count the
313: cooling time from the beginning of the cooling phase. Therefore,
314: we set here $t \rightarrow t-52$ days, and
315: we denote the cooling time
316: at time $t= n~days$ by $\tau^n$. We find
317: $\tau^{13} \approx (70~^+_- 10 )$ days,
318: $\tau^{50} \approx (190~^+_- 30 )$ days,
319: $\tau^{300} \approx (325~^+_- 40 )$ days,
320: and $\tau^{550} \approx (850~^+_- 280 )$ days.
321:
322: It is interesting to note that
323: the observed cooling following the 2001 July outburst is faster than
324: the cooling observed after the 1978 outburst.
325: \citet{sle99} found a WD temperature of 20,500K, 220 days after the outburst
326: against $\approx$ 19,000K at the same epoch for the 2001 outburst
327: (e.g. observing epoch of April 2002, day 266).
328: And $\approx$ 500 days after the 1978 outburst the temperature was still
329: around 17,500K while the present observations seem to indicate a
330: lower temperature ($\approx$ 17,000K) 466 days after the 2001 outburst.
331:
332: \section{Numerical Modeling}
333:
334: In order to model the accretional heating and subsequent cooling
335: of the WD in WZ Sge,
336: we use a 1D quasi-static evolutionary code without hydrodynamics
337: (quasi-static assumption).
338: It is an updated version of the quasi-static stellar
339: evolution code of \citet{sio95}.
340: The code includes time variable accretion, OPAL opacities and
341: boundary layer irradiation which indirectly accounts for the
342: stellar rotational velocity (see Eq.1 below).
343: Stellar rotation, however, is not included anywhere else in the code.
344: In this code, the white dwarf is computed all the way down to the
345: core, in the region well below the nuclear burning region.
346: Initial models are constructed by the fitting point method and the
347: resulting initial model down to a depth where $\rho =10^6 g~$cm$^{-3}$
348: is stored
349: as input for the evolution code.
350: For a given white dwarf mass and an initial effective surface temperature
351: ($T_{eff}$), we chose $R_{wd}$ to be the theoretical equilibrium radius.
352: The models built in this manner are initially
353: in equilibrium, and if no matter is accreted onto the WD surface, the
354: WD parameters do not undergo any change on the time scale studied here.
355: All other details of the code can be found in \citet{sio95}
356: and references therein.
357:
358: Numerical simulations
359: are carried out by switching on accretion
360: for the duration of a dwarf nova outburst interval and then shutting it
361: off to follow the cooling of the white dwarf.
362: In this way the effects of compressional heating
363: and boundary layer irradiation can be assessed quantitatively.
364: The matter is assumed to accrete 'softly' with the same
365: entropy as the white dwarf outer layers.
366: From theoretical considerations, one expects the accreting
367: matter, as it transits through the boundary layer region,
368: to increase its temperature (since the boundary layer temperature
369: is high: $T_{BL} >> T_{*}$). In addition in the boundary layer
370: region, the radial velocity is large and the accreting matter can
371: also heat up by shock. For these reasons the 'soft' accretion
372: assumption is actually not justified, since this advected energy
373: is non-negligible. However, in our treatment of the
374: boundary layer irradiation, we take into account part of this energy
375: by assuming that a fraction of the energy liberated in the boundary layer
376: ($L_{BL}$) is absorbed by the outer layer of the star: it is included as
377: a source in the energy equation in the outer layer of the star.
378:
379: The treatment of the boundary layer irradiation is done as follows.
380: The energy liberated in the boundary layer
381: is given by \citep{klu87}:
382: \begin{equation}
383: L_{BL}=\frac{1}{2} L_{acc} \left( 1 -
384: \frac{\Omega_{*}}{\Omega_K(R_{*})} \right) ^2,
385: \end{equation}
386: where
387: \[
388: L_{acc}=\frac{G M_{*} \dot{M}}{R_{*}}
389: \]
390: is the total accretion energy, $G$ is the gravitational constant,
391: $M_{*}$ is the mass of the star, $R_{*}$ is the radius of the star,
392: $\dot{M}$ is the mass accretion rate, $\Omega_{*}$ is the angular
393: rotation
394: rate of the star and $\Omega_K(R_{*})$ is the Keplerian angular
395: velocity at one stellar radius.
396: Equation (1) can be used as long as the disk is
397: geometrically thin and optically thick and extends to
398: the stellar surface.
399: In the present case one expects the stellar rotation
400: rate to be the rotation rate of the WD: $\Omega_{*}= \Omega_{wd}$.
401:
402: We assumed that only a fraction of
403: the boundary layer luminosity is irradiating the star,
404: namely:
405: \[
406: L_{irr} = \alpha \frac{L_{BL}}{2}.
407: \]
408: A value $\alpha=1$ means that half of the BL luminosity is
409: lost into space while the other half is absorbed by the star.
410: Assuming a value $\alpha=0.5$ means that only 25\% of the BL luminosity
411: is absorbed by the star.
412: Here, we choose $\alpha=0.5$, which is the value used
413: in the work of \citet{sha87}, and about half the estimated
414: value of \citet{reg89} who used $\alpha \approx 0.2 L_{acc}$.
415: We then assume different
416: rotation rates
417: \[
418: \eta = \frac{\Omega_{*}}{\Omega_K(R_{*})}.
419: \]
420: For a non rotating star $\eta = 0$ and the
421: BL luminosity is exactly half the accretion energy $L_{BL}=L_{acc}/2$,
422: while for a star rotating near break-up $\eta=1$ and $L_{BL}=0$.
423: In this work we took values
424: ranging from $\eta = 1$ (for no boundary layer irradiation, in order to
425: check only the effect of the compressional heating) down to
426: $\eta = 0.05$ (when the star is slowly rotating and boundary
427: layer irradiation is the main source of heating). Clearly a smaller value of
428: $\alpha$ will require a smaller value of $\eta$ in order to keep the
429: same amount of BL irradiation in a specific model, and vice versa.
430: However, the compressional heating results obtained in this work are not
431: at all affected by the value of $\alpha$ used in the simulations.
432:
433: In the simulations it is assumed that the accretion and
434: heating of the white dwarf
435: is uniform rather than being restricted to the equatorial region.
436: In addition, the transfer of angular momentum (by shear mixing)
437: into the white dwarf is neglected.
438:
439: \section{Results}
440:
441: As previously remarked in section 2,
442: during the outburst, as accretion takes place at a
443: high rate,
444: the star's photospheric emission is overwhelmed by the emission of
445: the hot components (mainly the inner disk),
446: which makes it difficult to assess the exact temperature of the star
447: and its rotation rate $\Omega_{wd}$.
448: However, on day 53 the system is found in a low state
449: and starts to cool. During that time the accretion rate has probably
450: dropped to its quiescence level.
451:
452: Numerical simulations \citep{god02} have shown that the
453: temperature increase, due to BL irradiation, is sustained
454: only during accretion, and when the accretion is turned off, the star
455: rapidly radiates away the BL
456: energy absorbed in its outermost layer. However,
457: the temperature increase due to compressional heating takes place deeper
458: in the outer layers of the star and it takes many days (months) for
459: the star to cool.
460: Therefore, we assume that in the cooling phase the observed
461: elevated temperature of the star is due to the compressional heating it
462: has endured during the outburst phase alone.
463:
464: Since BL irradiation and compressional heating take place at different
465: depths in the outer layers of the star, and on different time scales,
466: we model their effect on the temperature of the star in separate model
467: runs.
468:
469: First we model the compressional heating of the star alone ocuring
470: during the outburst phase,
471: therefore setting $\eta =\Omega_{wd}/\Omega_K =1 $ in the simulations.
472: The exact mass accretion
473: rate of the system is not known and it is changing with time during the
474: outburst.
475: From the optical light curve in Figure 1, it seems very likely
476: that initially the
477: mass accretion rate is very high at the onset of the outburst and
478: decreases steadily during the plateau phase.
479: At present, our code only simulates a constant accretion
480: rate, but at any time the accretion can be turned off to model the cooling.
481: Consequently, we model the outburst phase (plateau + rebrightening) by
482: accreting at a constant rate for 52 days, after which accretion is
483: turned off and the WD cools.
484: From Table 1, we expect the mass accretion
485: rate during the outburst phase to be of the order of (say) $3\times 10^{-9}
486: M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ and the temperature of the star to
487: increase from about $15,000K$ up to $28,000K$ (or more, see
488: Table 2) around day 53.
489: We run models with different white dwarf mass, namely $M_{wd}
490: = 0.7 M_{\odot}$, $1.0 M_{\odot}$, $1.2 M_{\odot}$ and vary
491: the mass accretion rate in the range
492: $ 10^{-9}M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1} < \dot{M} < 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$.
493: We chose the initial WD temperature to be around $13,500-15,000K$.
494: Ideally we are looking for a model that reaches a temperature of
495: $28,000K$ (or more) after 52 days of steady accretion, with $\dot{M} \approx
496: 3 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$, and with a temperature curve
497: as close as possible to the observations of Tables 1 \& 2.
498: In Table 3 we list models (1-4) obtained for different values
499: of $M_{wd}$ and $\dot{M}$.
500: From these models, model 3 with $M_{wd}=1.2 \times M_{\odot}$
501: and $\dot{M} = 9 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$/year,
502: yields the best fit. Both models 1 \& 2, with a lower white dwarf mass
503: ($0.7 M_{\odot}$ and 1 $M_{\odot}$ respectively),
504: and model 4, with a lower mass accretion rate ($5 \times 10^{-9}
505: M_{\odot}$/year), yield a lower temperature and a sharper
506: initial temperature drop than the observations.
507: In figure 2 we draw the temperature increase of the WD due to
508: compressional heating alone, together with the observed values, as a function
509: of time for model 3. Models 4 \& 2 are drawn in Figures 3 \& 4 respectively.
510:
511: Clearly, from Figures 3 \& 4, we see that
512: compressional heating alone cannot account for the observed temperatures
513: if the mass $M_{wd} < 1.2 \times M_{\odot} $ and/or
514: the mass accretion rate $\dot{M} < 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$/year,
515: because it produces lower temperatures than observed.
516: Since both a $1.2 M_{\odot}$ mass and a $10^{-8} M_{\odot}$/year
517: accretion rate are larger than expected, we decided to check
518: the effect of boundary layer irradiation on the temperature
519: of the white dwarf for a model with $M=1.0 M_{\odot}$ in addition
520: to the compressional heating. Namely, we decide to check how
521: boundary layer irradiation increases the temperature of
522: the model in addition to compressional heating.
523: Specifically, we chose model 2 arbitrarily around t=175 day.
524: There it has a temperature
525: of only 18,000K (due to compressional heating, Figure 4) while the
526: observations indicate that
527: the temperature should be at least 2,000K higher at that epoch.
528: We therefore run a 1.0 $M_{\odot}$ model (model 5, same mass as model 2)
529: with an initial temperature of 18,000K (to simulate day 175 of model 2)
530: and a quiescent mass accretion rate
531: ($\dot{M} \approx 10^{-12}-10^{-11} M_{\odot}$/year),
532: and we include boundary layer irradiation assuming a rotation rate
533: $\Omega_{wd}=0.2 \Omega_K$ (corresponding to the observed rotational
534: velocity of 1200km/s). Namely, we wish to check if the additional heating
535: of the boundary layer irradiation of the accretion disk during the cooling
536: phase (quiescent $\dot{M}$) can increase the temperature of
537: the model by 2,000K, and for what value of $\dot{M}$ (here we model
538: the combine effect of compressional heating and boundary layer
539: irradiation separately, model 2 and model 5 respectively).
540:
541: We find, from model 5 in Table 3, that one can increase the temperature
542: of model 2 at t=175 days by 2,000K by means of
543: boundary layer irradiation if the mass accretion rate
544: is at least $\dot{M} \approx 2 \times 10^{-11} M_{\odot}$/year.
545:
546: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
547:
548: In the present numerical exploration we first assumed that all
549: the accretional heating of the white dwarf was due to compressional
550: heating, and we found that the mass of the accreting
551: white dwarf needed in the
552: simulations of the WZ Sge superoutburst to fit the observations
553: was rather large: $1.2 M_{\odot}$.
554: The average mass accretion rate of the
555: outburst model, $9 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$,
556: assessed from the compressional
557: heating simulations, was itself larger by a factor of $\approx 5$, than the
558: average value determined from the spectral fits to the observations
559: which was $\approx 1.7 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ [25 days of
560: accretion at a rate $\dot{M}= 3 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$,
561: followed by 25 days of intermittent accretion
562: at an average rate of $\approx 5 \times 10^{-10} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$].
563:
564: When we assumed a smaller WD mass of only one solar mass,
565: we found that even with a high mass accretion rate of
566: $10^{-8} M_{\odot}$/year the
567: model could not account for the observed temperature.
568: For that model, we simulated a second source of
569: heating (in addition to compressional heating):
570: boundary layer irradiation at a quiescence
571: mass accretion rate, corresponding to the mass accretion
572: rate during the cooling period.
573: The mass accretion rate we obtained
574: ($2 \times 10^{-11} M_{\odot}$/yr; Table 3) to fit the
575: observations
576: is in agreement with a recent analysis of an X-ray observation
577: of WZ Sge. \citet{has02} presented results of a uniform analysis
578: of all the {\it{ASCA}} X-ray observations of non-magnetic CVs.
579: For WZ Sge they estimated an X-ray luminosity of about
580: $L_X \approx 2.7 \times 10^{30}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the range 0.5-10
581: keV, assuming a distance of 69 pc. Rescaling this value to the
582: better estimate of 43 pc (and also to be consistent with the distance
583: assumed in this work) leads to $L_X \approx 7 \times 10^{30}$
584: erg s$^{-1}$ for the X-ray Luminosity. \citet{has02}
585: found that optically thin boundary
586: layer models \citep{pop99} provide the best description of the data.
587: Since the disk is radiating in both +z and -z directions, the X-ray
588: luminosity is at least half the boundary layer luminosity,
589: namely: $L_X = L_{BL}/2$, and if the star does partially mask
590: the inner disk and boundary layer (since $i=78^o$), then one
591: has $L_X < L_{BL}/2$. For this reason we assume
592: $L_{BL} \approx 3 \times L_X \approx 2 \times 10^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
593: and using
594: \citet{klu87}'s relation for $L_{BL}$,
595: an angular velocity of $1200$km s$^{-1}$ and
596: a $1.0$ solar mass, we find the quiescence mass accretion rate
597: from the X-ray observation to be
598: $\dot{M} = 6 \times 10^{-12} M_{\odot}$/yr, about 3 times smaller than
599: our estimates.
600:
601: Another possibility, that we are unable to assess quantitatively,
602: is the slow release of rotational kinetic energy from the outer layer of
603: the star \citep{spa93}. If the outer layer of the star (equatorial belt) has been
604: spun up during the outburst, then rotational kinetic energy can be release
605: during the cooling phase as this fast rotating layer spins down. This
606: effect could account for an additional source of heating of the white
607: dwarf ocuring during the cooling phase.
608:
609: In this work we have shown that compressional heating alone can account
610: for the cooling curve of WZ Sge following the July 2001 superoutburst
611: only if the WD in WZ Sge is massive ($M_{wd}=1.2 M_{\odot}$) and the outburst
612: accretion rate is large ($\approx 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$).
613: If this is not the case, then compressional heating alone is not
614: enough to account for the observed decrease in the WD temperature, and
615: we suggest boundary layer irradiation from a quiescent accretion
616: disk and the slow release of rotational kinetic energy from a
617: fast rotating accretion belt as possible additional sources of
618: heating of the white dwarf to account for the observed temperatures.
619:
620: \acknowledgments
621:
622: We are thankful to Knox Long for providing us with temperature estimates
623: from his work before publication.
624: We are grateful to the VSNET collaboration for providing us with the data shown
625: on Figure 1. BTG acknowledges support from a PPARC Advanced Fellowship.
626: P. Godon is particularly thankful to C. Hasenkopf for providing us with
627: a copy of her paper on the X-ray analysis and to Thierry Lanz for kindly
628: providing us with the latest version of the Tlusty and Synspec codes.
629: S. Starrfield acknowledges partial support from NSF and NASA Grants to ASU.
630:
631: \newpage
632:
633: \begin{thebibliography}{}
634:
635: \bibitem[Bailey (1979)]{bai79}
636: Bailey, J., 1979, \mnras, 189, 41P
637:
638: \bibitem[Cheng et al. (1997)]{che97}
639: Cheng, F., Sion, E.M., Szkody, P., \& Huang, M. 1997,
640: ApJL, 484, L149
641:
642: \bibitem[Godon \& Sion (2002)]{god02}
643: Godon, P., \& Sion, E. M. 2002, \apj, 566, 1084.
644:
645: %\bibitem[Godon et al. (2003)]{god03}
646: %Godon, P., Cheng, F., Sion, E.M.,
647: %Szkody, P., Long, K., \& Froning, C. 2003, ApJ, submitted.
648:
649: \bibitem[Hasenkopf \& Eracleous (2002)]{has02}
650: Hasenkopf, C.A, \& Eracleous, M., 2002, AAS Meeting 201, 120.03
651:
652: \bibitem[Howell et al. (1999)]{how99}
653: Howell, S.B., Ciardi, D., Szkody, P., van Paradijs, J., Kuulkers, E.,
654: Cash, J., Sirk, M., \& Long, K.S. 1999, PASP, 111, 342
655:
656: \bibitem[Howell et al. (2002)]{how02}
657: Howell, S.B., Fried, R., Szkody, P., Sirk, M.,
658: \& Schmidt, G.2002, PASP, 114, 748
659:
660: \bibitem[Hubeny (1988)]{hub88} Hubeny, I. 1988, Comput. Phys. Comm., 52, 103
661:
662: \bibitem[Hubeny et al. (1994)]{hub94} Hubeny, I., Lanz, T.,
663: \& Jeffrey, S. 1994, Newsletter on Analysis
664: of Astronomical Spectra (St. Andrews Univ.), 20, 30
665:
666: \bibitem[Hubeny \& Lanz (1995)]{hub95} Hubeny, I., \& Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ,
667: 439, 875
668:
669: \bibitem[Ishioka et al. (2001)]{ish01}
670: Ishioka, R. et al. 2001, IAU Circ., 7669, 1
671:
672: \bibitem[Klu\'zniak (1987)]{klu87}
673: Klu\'zniak 1987, PhD Thesis, Standford University
674:
675: \bibitem[Knigge et al. (2002)]{kni02}
676: Knigge, C., Hynes, R.I., Steeghs, D., Long, K.S., Araujo-Betancor, S.,
677: \& Marsh, T.R., 2002, ApJ Letters, in press.
678:
679: \bibitem[Long et al. (2003a)]{lon03a}
680: Long, K.S., Froning, C.S., G\"ansicke, B., Knigge, C., Sion, E.M.,
681: \& Szkody, P. 2003, ApJ, submitted.
682:
683: \bibitem[Long et al. (2003b)]{lon03b}
684: Long, K.S., Sion, E.M., G\"ansicke, B., \& Szkody, P. 2003, submitted to ApJ
685:
686: \bibitem[Patterson et al. (2002)]{pat02}
687: Patterson J., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 721
688:
689: \bibitem[Popham (1999)]{pop99}
690: Popham, R. 1999, \mnras, 308, 979
691:
692: \bibitem[Regev \& Shara (1989)]{reg89}
693: Regev, O., \& Shara, M. M. 1989, \apj, 340, 1006
694:
695: \bibitem[Shaviv \& Starrfield (1987)]{sha87}
696: Shaviv, G., \& Starrfield, S. 1987, \apj, 321, L51
697:
698: \bibitem[Sion (1995)]{sio95}
699: Sion, E. M. 1995, \apj, 438, 876
700:
701: \bibitem[Sion et al. (2003a)]{sio03}
702: Sion, E.M., G\"ansicke, B.T., Long, K.S., Szkody, P., Cheng, F.,
703: Howell, S.B., Godon, P., Knigge, C., Marsh, T., Sparks, W.M.,
704: \& Starrfield, S., 2003, ApJ, in press.
705:
706: \bibitem[Slevinsky et al. (1999)]{sle99}
707: Slevinsky, R.J., Stys, D., West, S., Sion, E.M., \&
708: Cheng, R.H. 1999, PASP, 111, 1292
709:
710: \bibitem[Sparks et al. (1993)]{spa93}
711: Sparks, W.M., Sion, E.M., Starrfield, S., Austin, S. 1993, in
712: The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects
713: (eds. Regev and Shaviv)
714:
715: \bibitem[Wade \& Hubeny (1998)]{wad98}
716: Wade, R., \& Hubeny, I. 1998, ApJ, 509, 350
717:
718: \end{thebibliography}{}
719:
720: \clearpage
721:
722: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrccccc}
723: \tablewidth{0pc}
724: \tablecaption{
725: FUSE \& STIS observations of WZ Sge
726: }
727: \tablehead{
728: obs. & date & day & instrument & $T_{wd}$ & $\dot{M}$ & phase &
729: Reference$^1$ \\
730: number & & & & $<1,000K>$ & $<M_{\odot}/yr>$ & &
731: \\
732: }
733: \startdata
734: 1 & 30 Jul 01 & 7 & FUSE & - & 1-3e-09 & plateau
735: & [1] \\
736: 2 & 19 Aug 01 & 27 & STIS & 25.0 & - & dip
737: & [2] \\
738: 3 & 22 Aug 01 & 30 & STIS & - & 5e-10 &
739: rebrightening$^2$ & [2] \\
740: 4 & 07 Sep 01 & 46 & FUSE & 42.0 & - &
741: rebrightening$^2$ & [1] \\
742: 4 & 07 Sep 01 & 46 & FUSE & - & 1e-09 &
743: rebrightening$^2$ & [1] \\
744: 5 & 11 Sep 01 & 50 & STIS & Table 2 & 3e-10 &
745: rebrightening$^2$ & [3] \\
746: 6 & 29 Sep 01 & 68 & FUSE & 25.0 & - & cooling
747: & [1] \\
748: 7 & 10 Oct 01 & 79 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
749: & [3] \\
750: 8 & 07 Nov 01 & 107 & FUSE & 23.0 & - & cooling
751: & [1] \\
752: 9 & 10 Nov 01 & 110 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
753: & [3] \\
754: 10 & 11 Dec 01 & 141 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
755: & [3] \\
756: 11 & 15 Apr 02 & 266 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
757: & [3] \\
758: 12 & 05 Jun 02 & 317 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
759: & [3] \\
760: 13 & 27 Aug 02 & 400 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
761: & [3] \\
762: 14 & 01 Nov 02 & 466 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
763: & [3] \\
764: 15 & 23 Mar 03 & 608 & STIS & Table 2 & - & cooling
765: & [3] \\
766: \enddata
767: \tablenotetext{1}
768: {References: [1] Long et al. 2003a; [2] Knigge et al. 2002; [3]
769: see Table 2.}
770: \tablenotetext{2}
771: {The observations on day 30 and day 46 coincide with the first and 10th echo
772: outburst of the rebrightening phase respectively. The observation made
773: on day 50 was made during a relatively 'low' state between the 11th and
774: the 12th outburst in the rebrightening phase. The observation on day
775: 46 was modeled twice: once with a white dwarf atmosphere only and once
776: with an accretion disk only. The observation on day 50 was modeled
777: once with a white dwarf atmosphere only and once as a combination of an
778: accretion disk and a white dwarf atmosphere.}
779: \end{deluxetable}
780:
781: \clearpage
782:
783: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrcccc}
784: \tablewidth{0pc}
785: \tablecaption{
786: STIS temperature estimates of WZ Sge
787: }
788: \tablehead{
789: obs. & date & day & $T_{a}^1$ & $T_{b}^1$ & $T_{c}^1$ & (Flux)$^{1/4}$ \\
790: number & & &$<1000K>$&$<1000K>$&$<1000K>$& \\ }
791: \startdata
792: 5 & 11 Sep 01 & 50 & 31.9 & 27.0 & 28.2 & 3.8x$10^{-3}$ \\
793: 7 & 10 Oct 01 & 79 & 25.2 & 23.6 & 23.4 & 3.3x$10^{-3}$ \\
794: 9 & 10 Nov 01 & 110 & 23.7 & 22.4 & 22.1 & 3.1x$10^{-3}$ \\
795: 10 & 11 Dec 01 & 141 & 22.6 & 21.6 & 20.7 & 2.9x$10^{-3}$ \\
796: 11 & 15 Apr 02 & 266 & 19.5 & 18.8 & 18.1 & 2.5x$10^{-3}$ \\
797: 12 & 05 Jun 02 & 317 & 18.8 & 18.0 & 17.4 & 2.5x$10^{-3}$ \\
798: 13 & 27 Aug 02 & 400 & 17.8 & 17.4 & 16.7 & 2.4x$10^{-3}$ \\
799: 14 & 01 Nov 02 & 466 & 17.5 & 17.0 & 16.3 & 2.3x$10^{-3}$ \\
800: 15 & 23 Mar 03 & 608 & 17.2 & 16.6 & 15.9 & 2.2x$10^{-3}$ \\
801: \enddata
802: \tablenotetext{1}
803: {$T_a$ and $T_b$ were estimated in this work (see text) while
804: $T_c$ is from Long et al. 2003b.}
805: \end{deluxetable}
806:
807:
808: \clearpage
809:
810: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
811: \tablewidth{0pc}
812: \tablecaption{
813: Accretional heating models of WZ Sge
814: }
815: \tablehead{
816: Model&$M_{wd}$&$Log
817: R_{wd}$&$T_{wd}^{i(1)}$&$\dot{M}$&$T_{wd}^{max(2)}$&$\Omega_{wd}$&length$^{(3)}$\\
818: number &$<M_{\odot}>$&$<cm>$ & $<1,000K>$ & $<M_{\odot}/yr>$ &$<1,000K>$
819: &$<\Omega_K>$&$<days>$\\
820: }
821: \startdata
822: 1 & 0.7 & 8.95 & 15.0 & 1e-08 & 21.0 & 1.0 & 52 \\
823: 2 & 1.0 & 8.78 & 15.0 & 1e-08 & 25.0 & 1.0 & 52 \\
824: 3 & 1.2 & 8.60 & 14.5 & 9e-09 & 34.0 & 1.0 & 52 \\
825: 4 & 1.2 & 8.60 & 14.5 & 5e-09 & 27.5 & 1.0 & 52 \\
826: 5 & 1.0 & 8.78 & 18.0 & 2e-11 & 20.0 & 0.2 & -- \\
827: \enddata
828: \tablenotetext{1}
829: {The initial temperature of the white dwarf.
830: }
831: \tablenotetext{2}
832: {The maximum temperature reached by the model during the run.
833: }
834: \tablenotetext{3}
835: {Models for which the effect of boundary layer irradiation is taken into
836: account $(\Omega_{wd} < 1 )$ are run for a few days only.
837: }
838:
839: \end{deluxetable}
840:
841: \clearpage
842:
843: {\large{\bf{\center{
844: Figures Caption }}}}
845:
846: Figure 1: The VSNET optical light curve of the 2001 outburst of WZ Sge.
847: The first 6 observations are marked by arrows. The four different phases
848: of WZ Sge have been marked for clarity.
849:
850: Figure 2: Modeling the heating and cooling of WZ Sge.
851: The temperature (in Kelvin) of the
852: white dwarf is drawn as a function of time (in days) since the start of
853: the outburst (July 23, 2001)
854: The solid line represents the compressional
855: heating modeling, for 1.2 solar mass white dwarf with an initial temperature
856: of 14,500K, accreting at a rate of $9 \times 10^{-9} M_{\sun}/$year
857: for 52 days.
858: The stars, squares and plus signs denote the temperatures listed
859: in Table 2 $T_a$, $T_b$ and $T_c$ respectively.
860: The triangles are the FUSE data points and the circles represent the
861: temperature estimates using the flux values (see text).
862:
863: Figure 3: Same as Figure 2, but here the solid line represent a model
864: with a mass accretion rate of $5 \times 10^{-9} M_{\sun}/$year
865: and an initial temperature of 15,000K (model 4 in Table 3).
866:
867: Figure 4: Same as Figures 2 and 3. The solid line represents
868: model 2 in Table 3.
869:
870: \clearpage
871:
872: \begin{figure}
873: \plotone{f1.eps}
874: \figurenum{1}
875: \end{figure}
876:
877: \clearpage
878:
879: \begin{figure}
880: \plotone{f2.eps}
881: \figurenum{2}
882: \end{figure}
883:
884: \clearpage
885:
886: \begin{figure}
887: \plotone{f3.eps}
888: \figurenum{2}
889: \end{figure}
890:
891: \clearpage
892:
893: \begin{figure}
894: \plotone{f4.eps}
895: \figurenum{2}
896: \end{figure}
897:
898: \end{document}
899: