1: \documentclass{aa}
2: \usepackage{txfonts}
3: \usepackage{graphics,epsfig}
4:
5: \newcommand{\pmn}{PMN~J0134$-$0931}
6: \newcommand{\htwo}{\ensuremath{{\rm H_2}}}
7: \newcommand{\nhtwo}{\ensuremath{N_{\rm H_2}}}
8: \newcommand{\noh}{\ensuremath{N_{\rm OH}}}
9: \newcommand{\hco}{\ensuremath{{\rm HCO^+}}}
10: \newcommand{\nhco}{\ensuremath{N_{\rm HCO^+}}}
11: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
12: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-2}$}
13: \newcommand{\Dla}{ Damped Lyman-$\alpha$ }
14: \newcommand{\dla}{ damped Lyman-$\alpha$ }
15: \newcommand{\NHI}{N_{\rm HI}}
16: \newcommand{\noi}{\noindent}
17: \newcommand{\lb}{\left(}
18: \newcommand{\dV}{\Delta V}
19: \newcommand{\rb}{\right)}
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{HI absorption in a gravitational lens at $z \sim 0.7645$}
23: \titlerunning{HI 21cm absorption in a gravitational lens at $z \sim 0.7645$}
24:
25: \author{N. Kanekar \inst{1}\thanks{nissim@astro.rug.nl}
26: F. H. Briggs \inst{2}\thanks{fbriggs@mso.anu.edu.au}}
27: \authorrunning{Kanekar \& Briggs}
28: \institute{Kapteyn Institute, University of Groningen, Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen,
29: The Netherlands \and RSAA, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, ACT 2611, Australia}
30: \date{Received mmddyy/ accepted mmddyy}
31: \offprints{Nissim Kanekar}
32: \abstract{We have used the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope to
33: detect HI 21cm absorption at $z \sim 0.7645$ in the gravitational lens system towards
34: \pmn. The 21cm profile has two broad components, with peak optical depths of
35: $0.047 \pm 0.007$ and $0.039 \pm 0.007$, at heliocentric redshifts $0.76470
36: \pm 0.00006$ and $0.76348 \pm 0.00006$, respectively. The redshift of the
37: stronger component matches that of CaII H and K absorption detected earlier.
38: The absorption has a total velocity width of $\sim 500$~\kms~(between nulls) and
39: an equivalent width of $7.1 \pm 0.08$~\kms. This would imply a total HI column density
40: of $2.6 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{21}$~\cm, for a spin temperature of 200~K
41: and a covering factor of unity. The high estimated HI column density is
42: consistent with the presence of large amounts of dust at the lens redshift;
43: the intervening dust could be responsible for the extremely red colour
44: of the background quasar.
45: \keywords{Galaxies: individual: \pmn~ -- gravitational lensing -- radio lines -- ISM
46: }}
47: \maketitle
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: The $z \sim 2.2$ radio-loud quasar \pmn~is an exceedingly interesting object.
52: Its radio continuum consists of at least 6 components, with a maximum image
53: separation of $\sim 700$~mas (\cite{winn02} (W02); \cite{winn03} (W03)). Five of these
54: images (A -- E) have the same spectral index and a curved arc of emission is seen between
55: A and B. These properties caused W02 to argue that the object is a
56: gravitationally lensed system. Similarly, Gregg et al.~(2002) used the multiplicity
57: of components in a near-IR image as well as the high inferred source luminosity as
58: evidence for lensing. Interestingly enough, \pmn~is only the second lens of galactic
59: mass to show an image multiplicity greater than four; the other such lens is the
60: six-component system towards CLASS~B1359+154 (\cite{rusin01}).
61:
62: CaII H and K lines have been detected towards \pmn, at $z = 0.76451 \pm 0.00016$
63: (\cite{hall02}); the lens is thus likely to be at this redshift.
64: The CaII absorption is very strong, with rest frame equivalent width $\sim 5.3$
65: \AA, similar to that seen in the lens B0218+357 (\cite{browne93}). Further,
66: the quasar is highly reddened in optical wavebands, with $B - K \ge 11$
67: (\cite{gregg02}); this suggests the presence of large amounts of dust, either in
68: the host galaxy of the quasar or in the lensing galaxy. While the differential
69: extinction of the quasar images suggests that at least some of the reddening
70: is due to dust in the absorber, it has so far not been possible to conclusively
71: determine the location of the dust. Assuming the dust is at $z = 0.7645$ implies
72: $E(B-V) = 1.315$, i.e. a visual extinction $A_{\rm V} = 3.85$ (\cite{hall02}). In
73: conjunction with the strong CaII lines, this would suggest that the lens is a
74: gas-rich, late-type galaxy.
75:
76: More recently, Keeton \& Winn (2003) have come up with the first quantitative model
77: of the lensing system that explains most of its observed properties. The
78: background source is assumed to have two components and the lensing system
79: to consist of two galaxies.
80: The observed 5 components A -- E are then the images of one of the background sources and
81: component F is an image of the second, with the remaining two images of the
82: latter source too faint for detection. The model is supported by new
83: high-resolution radio and optical observations (W03), which found
84: that F has a different spectral index from images A -- E. These
85: observations also showed that the observed large sizes of components C and E
86: are not intrinsic but instead arise due to scatter broadening at the lower
87: frequencies. Finally, W03 find marginal evidence for a detection of
88: the two lens galaxies in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images of the system; Keeton \&
89: Winn (2003) predict these to be spiral galaxies, each with a velocity dispersion of about
90: $\sim 120$~\kms, and a projected separation of $\sim 0.4''$.
91:
92: We present, in this Letter, Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) observations
93: of HI 21cm absorption at $z \sim 0.7645$ towards \pmn.
94: The usual association of dust with high column densities of neutral gas
95: confirms that the dust is likely to be concentrated in the intervening
96: lens system. We describe the WSRT observations and data analysis in
97: section~\ref{sec:obs}; the spectra, results and models are presented and
98: discussed in section~\ref{sec:discussion}.
99:
100: \section{Observations and data analysis}
101: \label{sec:obs}
102:
103: \pmn~was observed with the UHF-High band of the WSRT on March 28 and
104: 31 and July 5 and 7, 2003, with the DZB correlator as the backend.
105: A single 5 MHz IF band was used on all occasions, sub-divided into
106: 1024 channels and centred at an observing frequency of 805~MHz; this yielded
107: a frequency resolution of $\sim 4.88$~kHz, i.e. a velocity resolution of
108: $\sim 1.8$~\kms. The standard calibrators 3C48 and 3C147 were used to calibrate
109: the absolute flux density scale at all observing epochs; their adopted flux
110: densities are on the scale of Baars et al.~(1977). The system bandpass was
111: calibrated with observations of 3C48, 3C147, 3C454.3 or 3C138. All fourteen
112: WSRT antennas were available for the observations in all observing runs. The total
113: on-source time was 17.6 hours.
114:
115: The data were converted from the telescope format to FITS and then analyzed
116: in classic AIPS, using standard techniques. Data from the March and July
117: runs were analyzed separately and self-calibrated independently. Spectra from the
118: two epochs were corrected to the heliocentric frame outside AIPS and then averaged
119: together. The flux density of \pmn~was measured to be $590 \pm 2$~mJy on all
120: observing runs.
121:
122: We note that two strong, narrow RFI spikes were found to be present not far from the
123: expected location of the redshifted 21cm line; these were seen in both the March and
124: July runs, at the same observing frequencies (i.e. shifted heliocentric
125: frequencies).
126: The high initial spectral resolution of the observations limited
127: the effect of these spikes on neighbouring channels; the data were also Hanning
128: smoothed in frequency, to further reduce spectral ringing.
129:
130:
131: \section{Discussion}
132: \label{sec:discussion}
133:
134: \subsection{The 21cm spectrum and derived quantities}
135: \label{sec:21cm}
136:
137: \begin{figure}
138: \centering
139: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=3.5in}
140: \caption{Final WSRT HI 21cm spectrum towards \pmn. The x and y axes are
141: heliocentric frequency (in MHz) and flux density (in mJy) respectively;
142: the top axis is heliocentric velocity (in \kms), relative to $z = 0.7645$.
143: The spectrum has been boxcar smoothed by 3 channels and has a velocity
144: resolution of $\sim 10.8$~\kms~and an RMS noise of $\sim 4.1$~mJy.
145: }
146: \label{fig:lowres}
147: \end{figure}
148:
149: The final WSRT HI 21cm spectrum towards \pmn~is shown in figure~\ref{fig:lowres};
150: this has been boxcar smoothed by three channels (and re-sampled) and has a
151: velocity resolution of $\sim 10.8$~\kms~and an RMS noise of $\sim 4.1$~mJy.
152: The redshift of the CaII lines (\cite{hall02}) is shown below the spectrum,
153: with error bars.
154:
155: Two deep features can be immediately identified in the spectrum of Fig.~\ref{fig:lowres},
156: with their peak optical depths at heliocentric frequencies of $804.898 \pm 0.03$ and
157: $805.455 \pm 0.03$~MHz, i.e. heliocentric redshifts of $0.76470 \pm 0.00006$
158: and $0.76348 \pm 0.00006$ respectively.
159: The redshift of the first of these features agrees with that of the CaII lines, within the
160: errors. This is also the deeper of the two HI components, with a peak optical
161: depth of $0.047 \pm 0.007$; the second feature has a peak optical depth of
162: $0.039 \pm 0.007$. The HI absorption is extremely wide, with a total velocity
163: spread (between nulls) of $\sim 500$~\kms. This is similar to the width of the
164: CaII lines, which have $\sigma_{\rm v} = 220 \pm 40$~\kms~(\cite{hall02}).
165:
166: The equivalent width of the 21cm profile is $\int \tau_{\rm 21} \mathrm{d}V =
167: 7.06 \pm 0.08$~\kms. This is is higher than that measured in either of
168: the other gravitational lenses in which HI absorption has so far been detected,
169: B0218+357 ($EW = 2.94 \pm 0.02$~\kms; Kanekar et al. 2003) and PKS~1830$-$21
170: ($EW = 5.8 \pm 0.4$~\kms; Chengalur et al. 1999). The large equivalent width
171: implies a very HI column density $\NHI = 2.6 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{21} \lb T_{\rm s} / 200 {\rm K}
172: \rb \lb 1 / f \rb$~\cm~(e.g. Kanekar \& Chengalur 2003), where $f$ is the
173: covering factor of the absorber and $T_{\rm s}$, its spin temperature; this is well into the
174: range observed in damped Lyman-$\alpha$ systems (e.g. Wolfe et al. 1986).
175: We note that a spin temperature of $\sim 200$~K is typical of spiral galaxies,
176: both locally (\cite{braun92}) and at low redshift (\cite{kanekar03}).
177: Of course, the above estimate of $\NHI$ gives the sum of HI column densities
178: towards {\it all} the different source components giving rise
179: to the 21cm absorption; it is not possible to measure the column
180: density towards individual source components with the available data.
181:
182: The extremely high estimated HI column density implies a high dust content
183: in the $z \sim 0.7645$ lens and explains the observed reddening in the optical
184: images (\cite{gregg02}; W03). Assuming that the molecular hydrogen column density is
185: roughly equal to $\NHI$, the total hydrogen column density $N_{\rm H} =
186: 2 N_{\rm H_2} + \NHI \sim 7.8 \times 10^{21}$~\cm~(again assuming $T_{\rm s} = 200$~K
187: and a covering factor of unity). This implies $E(B-V)\sim 1.35$, using a
188: Galactic dust to gas ratio; further assuming a Galactic extinction law
189: ($R_{\rm V} = 3.1$; \cite{binney98}) results in a visual extinction $A_{\rm V} \sim 4.15$.
190: Of course, it is likely that the 21cm absorption profile (and hence the
191: estimated column density) contains contributions from more than one
192: line of sight, with variable optical depth and kinematics across the
193: complex lensing image; it is thus not possible to estimate the
194: visual extinction towards individual source components.
195:
196:
197: \subsection{Modelling the absorption}
198: \label{sec:models}
199:
200: \begin{figure*}
201: \epsfig{file=fig2a.ps,width=2.4in,height=2.4in}
202: \vskip -2.29in
203: \hskip 2.38in
204: \epsfig{file=fig2b.ps,width=2.37in}
205: \vskip -2.1in
206: \hskip 4.8in
207: \epsfig{file=fig2c.ps,width=2.4in,height=2.4in}
208: \caption{Disk galaxy models for the absorption profile. Central Panel [B]:
209: The six principal image components (A--F) of the 1.7~GHz VLBA image of
210: W03 (grey-scale), with two sets of ellipses drawn to indicate the
211: orientation and inclination of the intervening model disk galaxies.
212: The galaxy centre is marked by a $+$ and a $\times$ for Models~I and II,
213: respectively;
214: the two filled squares indicate the mass centroids of the two mass
215: lens model of Keeton \& Winn (2003). Left Panel [A]: 21cm spectrum derived
216: from Model I (heavy line) superimposed on the observed 21cm profile (dashed line).
217: Right Panel [C]: 21cm spectrum derived from Model II (heavy line) superimposed
218: on the observed 21cm profile (dashed line). In both cases, the zero of the velocity scale
219: corresponds to 805 MHz ($z=0.76448$, heliocentric) . See text for discussion.
220: }
221: \label{fig:models}
222: \end{figure*}
223:
224: The lens towards \pmn~creates a complex radio image of six image components (A -- F), with
225: a maximum angular separation of $\sim 681$~mas (W02). Components A and B are seen
226: to connect in a section of lensing arc at faint levels in the 1.7~GHz VLBA image
227: (W03). Components C and E appear to be strongly scatter broadened at frequencies
228: below 5~GHz and are almost undetected in VLBA images at 1.7~GHz (W02,W03), as
229: they are over-resolved by even the shortest baselines of the VLBA. Note, however, that
230: their flux must be present in the integral flux density measured in our spectrum
231: at 805~MHz; further, they provide additional lines of sight through the $z \sim 0.7645$
232: absorber. Next, while component F has a significantly steeper spectrum than the
233: other five components, its total flux density is only $11 \pm 1$~mJy at 1.7~GHz;
234: it is thus quite unlikely to have sufficient flux density at 805~MHz to give rise
235: to either of the two main 21cm components. Further, while it is possible that the
236: some of the wide, weak absorption arises against this component, this would require a
237: fairly high optical depth ($\tau \ga 0.5$). The 21cm absorption is thus most likely to
238: arise against the brighter components A, B, C and D (and perhaps the arc of radio
239: emission between A and B), each of which have flux densities $\ga 100$~mJy
240: at 1.7~GHz. We note that component A also shows evidence for scatter broadening at
241: frequencies below 5~GHz while D is the most strongly reddened of the source
242: components; on the other hand, B is the bluest of all components and
243: shows no evidence for scatter broadening in the VLBA images (W03). This
244: suggests that there is relatively less dust and gas along the line of sight
245: to component B; the two main 21cm features thus appear most likely to arise
246: from absorption against components A and D.
247:
248: We have explored these possibilities with a simple kinematic model using
249: a differentially rotating disk absorber. The modelling does not produce a
250: unique result, but rather succeeds in demonstrating that a single, massive
251: galaxy could indeed be responsible for the 21cm absorption profile. If a more
252: complex, multi-galaxy system were to be invoked, there would be ample free
253: parameters to fit the integral spectrum reported here. Further observational
254: progress will require radio interferometry to separate the absorption along different
255: lines of sight.
256:
257: The philosophy of modelling the 21cm profile shape is based on the assumption that
258: narrow absorption features occur in the spectrum when a compact, high-surface brightness
259: image of the background radio source ``selects'' a small patch from an extended,
260: smooth velocity field of a rotating galaxy. Thus, the two main narrow 21cm features
261: of Fig.~\ref{fig:lowres} are expected to be associated with specific source components
262: of the background source, once VLBI observations are conducted in the 21~cm line.
263: The modelling uses the source structure obtained from the 1.7~GHz VLBA maps of W03 for
264: the compact radio components, with a scaling in flux to
265: both match the relative flux densities of the components in the higher frequency bands,
266: and still produce the integral flux density measured at 805~MHz by our WSRT observations.
267: The more extended components C and E had to be supplemented with diffuse
268: gaussian components to account for the flux missing from the VLBA map.
269:
270: The two models discussed here (and shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:models}[B]) are representative
271: of two broad classes which can
272: reproduce the observed 21cm profile. It should be emphasized, however, that neither
273: class is able to account for {\it all} the observations simultaneously, including the
274: scatter broadening and reddening of different source components. Both models are
275: axially symmetric, planar
276: systems with rotation curves that are flat at $V_{\rm rot}$ in the outer regions, with a
277: linear rise from the centre to $R_{\rm c}$. The systemic velocity of the galaxy is offset
278: from 805~MHz
279: ($z=0.76448$) by $V_{\rm off}$, and the galaxy centroid is specified by the projected
280: positional offsets $\Delta X$ (west), $\Delta Y$ (north) relative to image D. The
281: HI optical depth profile for each pixel is broadened by a velocity dispersion of
282: $\sigma_{\rm v}=7$~km~s$^{-1}$ before computing that pixel's contribution to the integral
283: absorption spectrum.
284:
285: \subsubsection{Model I}
286:
287: Models belonging to class I are motivated by the need to inflict heavy reddening on
288: image D without reddening B, coupled with accounting for the scatter broadening
289: of A and C. However, this model does not account for the scatter broadening of image
290: E. The model parameters are: position angle of the receding major axis $p=-50^{\circ}$
291: ($+p$, measured east from north), inclination to sky plane $i=85^{\circ}$, $V_{\rm rot}=230$~km~s$^{-1}$,
292: $R_{\rm c}=1.4$~kpc, exponential gas scale height $h=0.7$~kpc, $V_{\rm off}= 35$~km~s$^{-1}$,
293: and galaxy position at $\Delta X=490$~mas, $\Delta Y=370$~mas. In this highly
294: inclined model, the HI column density measured perpendicular to the galaxy plane is only
295: $3{\times}10^{19}(T_{\rm s}/100)$~cm$^{-2}$ in the region that covers components A and C,
296: but it rises to $3{\times}10^{20}(T_{\rm s}/100)$~cm$^{-2}$ for B and D. The high disk
297: inclination increases the line of sight column densities by an order of magnitude.
298: The 21cm spectrum resulting from this model is shown in fig.~\ref{fig:models}[A].
299: Here, the two narrow features arise from absorption against A and D;
300: the extended weak absorption wing out to $\sim +300$~\kms~is achieved by tipping
301: the intervening disk to a high inclination and thickening the HI layer with a
302: scale height of $\sim 700$~pc (in the spirit of Briggs et al.~(1985) and
303: Prochaska and Wolfe~(1997)).
304:
305:
306: \subsubsection{Model II}
307:
308: The second, somewhat orthogonal, class of models (of which Model II is an example)
309: has an infinitesimally thin disk, oriented to cast a shadow on images A, B, C, and E,
310: thereby accounting for the observed scatter broadening of A, C, and E, but implying that
311: all would be vulnerable to reddening in contradiction with B being the bluest and
312: D being the reddest of the images. The model parameters are: $p=+52^{\circ}$,
313: $i=72.5^{\circ}$, $V_{\rm rot}=250$~km~s$^{-1}$, $R_{\rm c}=0.8$~kpc, (gas scale height $h=0$~kpc),
314: $V_{\rm off}=-15$~km~s$^{-1}$, and galaxy position at $\Delta X=535$~mas, $\Delta Y=290$~mas.
315: This model has an exponential radial decline in HI column density, with scale length
316: 1.5~kpc, from a central peak of $1.5{\times}10^{21}(T_{\rm s}/100)$~cm$^{-2}$ measured
317: perpendicular to the disk plane. The spectrum resulting from the above orientation
318: is shown in fig.~\ref{fig:models}[C]. Here, the two narrow features arise against
319: images A and B, while the broad shoulder at positive velocities stems from
320: absorption against image C and the radio arc connecting A and B.
321:
322: \section{Summary}
323:
324: The 21cm absorption line profile at $z \sim 0.7645$ towards \pmn~has two primary
325: components and a broad weak trough, It has a total velocity width of
326: $\sim 500$~\kms~and the largest HI equivalent width so far detected in a
327: gravitational lens system. The extremely high estimated HI column density
328: $\NHI = 2.6 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{21} \lb T_{\rm s} / 200 {\rm K} \rb \lb 1 / f
329: \rb$~\cm~suggests that the reddening of the quasar is due to dust in the
330: $z \sim 0.7645$ lens.
331:
332: None of the galaxy models that assume a single disk-like absorber have
333: succeeded in accounting for all the observations, although the models can
334: roughly reproduce the observed 21cm absorption profile. Specifically, Model~I
335: in Sect.~\ref{sec:models} does not account for the observed scatter broadening
336: of component E while Model~II fails to reproduce the fact that D is the reddest
337: and B, the bluest, of all images. Of course, the large 21cm velocity width
338: of $\sim 500$~\kms~could also arise if the absorption occurs in two separate
339: galaxies. This is in agreement with the suggestion of Keeton \& Winn (2003)
340: that the lensing system consists of two spiral systems. Further, it is
341: consistent with the HST image of W03 showing marginal detections of two galaxies,
342: the northern one close to images A, C and E and the southern one near
343: image~D. For example, the northern ``galaxy'' in the HST image might
344: cause the main 21cm feature and most of the broad, weak absorption, arising
345: against images A, C, E and the radio arc, while the southern ``galaxy''
346: causes the secondary (blue-shifted) feature (and perhaps some of the broad
347: trough), through absorption against image D. The present 21cm data do not
348: warrant a detailed modelling of such a two-galaxy absorption system as
349: the number of free parameters is far larger than the number of observational
350: constraints (especially given that the observed 21cm profile can be
351: reproduced with a single disk galaxy model). High resolution radio
352: interferometric observations at 805~MHz will help refine the kinematic
353: models and shed more light on the nature of the intervening lens system.
354:
355: \begin{acknowledgements}
356: We thank Rene Vermeulen for much help with the planning and scheduling of these
357: WSRT service observations. We are also grateful to Josh Winn for providing the
358: 1.7~GHz VLBA image and CC file for use in our modelling. The Westerbork Synthesis
359: Radio Telescope is operated by the ASTRON (Netherlands Foundation for Research
360: in Astronomy) with support from the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO).
361: \end{acknowledgements}
362:
363:
364:
365: \begin{thebibliography}{}
366:
367: \bibitem[Baars et al. 1977]{baars77} Baars J.~W.~M.,
368: Genzel R., Pauliny-Toth I.~I.~K., \& Witzel A. 1977, A\&A, 61, 99
369: \bibitem[Binney \& Merrifield 1998]{binney98} Binney J.~J., \& Merrifield M.
370: 1998, Galactic Astronomy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
371: \bibitem[Braun \& Walterbos 1992]{braun92} Braun R., \& Walterbos R.~A.~M. 1992,
372: ApJ, 386, 120
373: \bibitem[Briggs et al. 1985]{briggs85} Briggs F.~H., Wolfe A.~M., Turnshek D.~A.,
374: \& Schaeffer J. 1985, ApJ, 293, 387
375: \bibitem[Browne et al. 1993]{browne93} Browne I.~W.~A., Patnaik A.~R.,
376: Walsh D., \& Wilkinson P.~N. 1993, MNRAS, 263, L32
377: \bibitem[Carilli et al. 1993]{carilli93} Carilli C.~L., Rupen M.~P., \& Yanny B.
378: 1993, ApJ, 412, L59
379: \bibitem[Chengalur et al. 1999]{chengalu99} Chengalur J.~N., de Bruyn A.~G., \&
380: Narasimha D. 1999, A\&A, 343, L79
381: \bibitem[Gregg et al. 2002]{gregg02} Gregg M.~D., Lacy M., White R.~L., et al. 2002,
382: ApJ, 564, 133
383: \bibitem[Hall et al. 2002]{hall02} Hall P.~B., Richards G.~T., York D.~G., et al.
384: 2002, ApJ, 575, L51
385: \bibitem[Kanekar \& Chengalur{2002}]{kanekar02} Kanekar N., \&
386: Chengalur J. N. 2002, A\&A, 381, L73
387: \bibitem[Kanekar \& Chengalur {2003}]{kanekar03} Kanekar N., \&
388: Chengalur J. N. 2003, A\&A, 399, 857
389: \bibitem[Kanekar et al. 2003]{kanekar03b} Kanekar N., Chengalur J. N.,
390: de Bruyn A.~G., \& Narasimha D. 2003, MNRAS, 345, L7
391: \bibitem[Keeton \& Winn 2003]{keeton03} Keeton C.~R., \& Winn J.~N. 2003, ApJ, 590, 39
392: \bibitem[Prochaska \& Wolfe 1997]{prochaska97} Prochaska J.~X., \& Wolfe A.~M.
393: 1997, ApJ, 487, 73
394: \bibitem[Rusin et al. 2001]{rusin01} Rusin D., Kochanek C.~S., Norbury M. et al.
395: 2001, ApJ, 557, 594
396: \bibitem[Winn et al. 2002]{winn02} Winn J.~N., Lovell J.~E.~J., Chen H-W. et al.
397: 2002, ApJ, 564, 143
398: \bibitem[Winn et al. 2003]{winn03} Winn J.~N., Kochanek C.~S., Keeton C.~R., \&
399: Lovell J.~E.~J. 2003, ApJ, 590, 26
400: \bibitem[Wolfe et al. 1986]{wolfe86} Wolfe A.~M., Turnshek D.~A., Smith H.~E., \&
401: Cohen R.~D. 1986, ApJS, 61, 249.
402:
403: \end{thebibliography}
404: \end{document}
405:
406: