1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% USES AASTeX version 5.2 - Preprint Style - LaTeX2e
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: %==============================================================================
6: % LaTeX Preamble
7: %==============================================================================
8:
9:
10: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11: % New commands here
12: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_\odot$}
13: \newcommand{\lsun}{L$_\odot$}
14: \newcommand{\days}{$d$}
15: \newcommand{\degree}{$^\circ$}
16: \newcommand{\ud}{{\rm d}}
17:
18: % Comments and running headers
19: %\slugcomment{Version 20allfin}
20: \shorttitle{Spatially Resolved Nuclear Dust in Centaurus A}
21: \shortauthors{M. Karovska et al.}
22:
23:
24: % Document starts here --------------------------------------------------------
25: \begin{document}
26:
27:
28: %==============================================================================
29: % Document Preamble
30: %==============================================================================
31:
32: % Document title
33: \title{Spatially Resolved Circumnuclear Dust in Centaurus A}
34:
35: % Authors
36: \author{Margarita Karovska, Massimo Marengo, Martin Elvis, Giovanni
37: G. Fazio, Joseph L. Hora}
38: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
39: Cambridge, MA 02138}
40: \email{karovska@cfa.harvard.edu}
41:
42: \author{Philip M. Hinz, William F. Hoffmann, Michael Meyer, Eric Mamajek}
43: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry
44: Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721-0065}
45:
46:
47: %==============================================================================
48: % Abstract and subject headings
49: %==============================================================================
50:
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: In this paper we present results from our exploratory mid-IR study of
54: Centaurus A circumnuclear environment using high-angular resolution
55: imaging at the Magellan 6.5m telescope with the MIRAC/BLINC camera. We
56: detected emission from a compact region surrounding the nuclear
57: source, and obtained photometry at 8.8~$\mu$m and in the N band. Our
58: analysis suggests that the nuclear region is resolved with a size of
59: $\approx$3~pc. The mid-IR emission from this region is likely
60: associated with cool dust with an estimated temperature of $\sim$160~K,
61: surrounding the central ``hidden'' AGN. We discuss the characteristics
62: of this emission in relation to other mid-IR observations and
63: the implications on models of dust formation in AGNs.
64: \end{abstract}
65:
66: % Keywords
67: \keywords
68: {galaxies: active --- galaxies: nuclei ---
69: galaxies: individual (Centaurus A, NGC5128) --- techniques: high angular resolution
70: }
71:
72: %==============================================================================
73: % Document main body
74: %==============================================================================
75:
76:
77:
78: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
79: % Introduction
80: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81:
82: \section{Introduction}\label{sec-intro}
83:
84:
85:
86: The nearest radio-bright AGN is located at a distance of ``only''
87: $\sim 3.5$~Mpc in the giant elliptical galaxy
88: NGC5128 (Cen A) ({\it vis}
89: review by Israel 1998). The central
90: engine powering this galaxy is thought to be a supermassive
91: black hole
92: %($M_{\bf {BH}}=2 \times 10^{8}M_\sun$; Marconi {\it et al.} 2001)
93: enshrouded in a region containing dust and gas
94: heated by the central source (Marconi {\it et al.}
95: 2001).
96: Multi-wavelength observations of Cen A
97: reveal many complex
98: multi-scale structures, at scales ranging from a sub-pc to hundreds of
99: kpc (eg. Karovska {\it et al.} 2002).
100: A radio and
101: X-ray jet powered by the central source extends across
102: the galaxy to a distance of
103: several hundreds of kpc
104: from the nucleus.
105: Optical and near-IR images of Cen A show large spatial scale (several
106: kpc in size) dark bands stretching across the
107: middle of the
108: galaxy and obscuring the central
109: region, probably due to
110: absorption by dust and other cool material. These dust lanes are
111: thought to be a remnant of a merger with a smaller spiral
112: galaxy (Schiminovich {\it et al.} 1994).
113: Using mid-infrared and
114: sub-millimeter wavelength observations of the central region of Cen A,
115: Mirabel {\it et al.} (1999) detected
116: dust emission from a large scale
117: bisymmetric structure (5kpc in size) resembling a
118: barred spiral galaxy.
119:
120:
121: Because of its proximity, Cen A provides a unique possibility for
122: high-spatial resolution
123: studies of the circumnuclear
124: environment of AGNs using ground- and space-based large-aperture
125: telescopes (0.1'' corresponds to $\sim 1.5$~pc at the Cen A distance
126: of $\sim$3.5~Mpc).
127: However, exploring the nuclear region of Cen A at optical
128: wavelengths presents a major challenge because of the high extinction
129: (eg. $A_V \sim 10$~mags; Alexander et al. 1999) due to
130: heavy obscuration by the dust in the dust lanes.
131:
132: Although the diffraction limited telescope resolution is significantly
133: lower in the mid-IR when compared to the optical ($\sim$ 10 times),
134: the spectral range from 8 to 20~$\mu$m is, nevertheless,
135: particularly suitable for studying the emission from the region
136: surrounding the nucleus because of at least ten times lower opacity.
137: The lower opacity of astronomical dust at these wavelengths
138: (Draine \& Lee 1984) permits penetration of
139: the optically opaque dust lanes.
140: Most of the
141: thermal radiation from dust is in fact emitted at these wavelengths,
142: as seen in the mid-IR ISOCAM spectra of Cen A which
143: show the presence of the characteristic silicate broad absorption
144: feature at 9.8~$\mu$m, plus a possible PAH emission line at
145: 11.3~$\mu$m.
146: Alexander et al. 1999 suggested that the presence of a very
147: deep 10~$\mu$m silicate absorption
148: feature in the ISOCAM spectrum could be due to self-absorption in a
149: dusty circumnuclear region, in addition to the extinction by the dust in the
150: dust lanes (optical depth $\tau_\nu \simeq 1$ at 10~$\mu$m).
151:
152:
153: We report here results from our mid-IR
154: imaging of Cen A with the MIRAC/BLINC mid-IR camera at
155: Magellan, showing that the nuclear region is resolved at a
156: sub-arcsecond scale.
157: The
158: observations and the techniques for data acquisition and reduction are
159: described in the next section. Results and analysis are presented in
160: section 3, and discussed in relation to other
161: available observations and models in section 4.
162:
163:
164: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
165: % Observations and Data Reduction
166: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
167:
168:
169:
170: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}\label{sec-obs}
171:
172: During an exploratory observation of Cen A on May 1 and 2, 2002 at the
173: Magellan I (Baade) telescope we detected a
174: compact mid-IR source
175: in the images of the nuclear region at 8.8~$\mu$m and in the N
176: band. The Baade Telescope, with a primary aperture of 6.5m equipped
177: with active optics, provides diffraction limited sub-arcsecond images in the
178: 8.8~$\mu$m spectral window (Shectman \& Johns 2003).
179: The images of Cen A and several reference sources were recorded using
180: the mid-IR camera MIRAC/BLINC. MIRAC/BLINC uses a Boeing HF16 128$\times$128 Si:As
181: blocked impurity band detector (Hoffmann et al. 1998).
182:
183: We obtained images
184: using the MIRAC/BLINC 8.8~$\mu$m 10\%
185: passband filter and the wide N band filter (from 8.1 to 13.1~$\mu$m)
186: centered at 10.3~$\mu$m. The
187: total on-source integration time was 1400~s at 8.8~$\mu$m and 900~s
188: in the N band. The reference stars
189: $\gamma$~Cru and IRC$+$10220, observed while transiting at a similar
190: airmass as the source, provide flux and Point Spread Function (PSF)
191: calibration information.
192: To insure similar observing conditions, including similar
193: telescope orientation, airmass and seeing conditions,
194: the observations of Cen A were made
195: close in time (within couple of hours) to the observations of the corresponding
196: reference stars.
197: In addition, we used the Magellan telescope
198: active optics (looking at standard stars in
199: the field of view) to monitor the seeing stability, by checking that the
200: size and the
201: shape of the PSF at the beginning of each observation of Cen A is consistent
202: with those of the corresponding reference.
203:
204: On the Magellan,
205: MIRAC/BLINC has a plate scale of 0.12~arcsec pix$^{-1}$, providing a total
206: field of view of $17'' \times 17''$. This pixel scale ensures Nyquist
207: sampling of the diffraction-limited PSF.
208: As described below, we obtained further
209: sub-sampling of the PSF by using dithering techniques.
210: We used a standard nodding and chopping technique to remove the
211: background signal, dithering the source on the array to obtain
212: sub-sampling of the PSF.
213: Chopping is carried
214: out through rotation of an internal mirror to mitigate noise
215: due to sky brightness fluctuations.
216: The chop frequency was set to 10~Hz, with a
217: throw of $8''$ in the North-South direction. The nod throw was also set
218: to $8''$, but in the East-West direction, in order to have all four
219: chop-nod beams inside the field of view of the array. Each individual
220: nod cycle required 15~s (8.8~$\mu$m) or 10~s (N band) on-source
221: integration, and the procedure was repeated for as many cycles as
222: needed to obtain the total integration time at each wavelength.
223:
224: The data were analyzed by first subtracting the chop-on from the
225: chop-off frames for both nodding beams. The two images thus obtained
226: were then subtracted one from the other, in order to get a single
227: frame in which the source appears in all four beams (two negative and
228: two positive). We then applied a gain matrix, derived from images of
229: the dome (high intensity uniform background) and the sky (low
230: intensity uniform background), to flat field the chop-nodded image.
231: This procedure was repeated for each of the nodding cycles for which
232: the source was observed. A final high signal-to-noise ratio cumulative
233: image was then obtained by co-adding together all the beam frames, each
234: re-centered and shifted on the source centroid. This last
235: co-adding step was performed on a sub-pixel grid, providing a final pixel
236: scale of 0.03~arcsec pix$^{-1}$. A mask file to
237: block out the effects of bad pixels and field vignetting was also
238: created and applied at each individual frame before their shifting,
239: preventing individual rejected
240: pixels from contributing to the final image.
241: To ensure a
242: uniform treatment of the source and the standard the same observing and
243: reduction procedure was also used for the reference star.
244:
245:
246:
247:
248: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
249: % Results and Analysis
250: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251:
252: \section{Results and Analysis}\label{sec-results}
253:
254: \subsection{Imaging of the Circumnuclear region}
255:
256: The mid-IR images of the nuclear region of Cen A obtained at
257: 8.8~$\mu$m and in the N band are
258: systematically larger then the unresolved reference
259: sources (or the ``observed'' PSFs) recorded under similar observing
260: conditions and using the same filters.
261: In Figure~1 we show the
262: images of Cen A and the reference star $\gamma$~Cru obtained at 8.8~$\mu$m.
263: The comparison of image sizes clearly shows that the Cen A image
264: of the nuclear region is
265: larger than the image of the unresolved point-like reference source
266: at this wavelength.
267: We note that the 8.8~$\mu$m images of Cen A and the reference
268: have better resolution
269: and are of higher signal-to-noise then the images obtained in the wide N band
270: centered at 10~$\mu$m.
271:
272:
273: The difference in size between the point source and the Cen A nuclear
274: region is shown in Figure~2, which displays the radial profiles of the
275: source and the reference at 8.8 ~$\mu$m normalized at the same peak value.
276: This suggests that the Cen A nuclear region
277: is resolved, with the size near
278: the resolution limit of the Magellan 6.5 m telescope.
279: We estimated the angular size of the Cen A nuclear region by
280: convolving the reference star radial profile with a gaussian, and then
281: fitting to the Cen A data at the corresponding bandpasses.
282: The best fit at 8.8~$\mu$m gives a FWHM of 0.17 $\pm 0.02''$.
283: The N band size estimate is consistent, with larger error bars
284: because of the lower S/N in these data.
285:
286:
287:
288: At the distance of Cen A, the measured FWHM angular size
289: corresponds to a
290: linear size of $\approx 3$~pc, or $\sim$10~Ly.
291: This
292: is in agreement with the predicted size of the dust emitting region
293: based on model fitting of ISOCAM spectra with
294: emission from the dust lanes and from a separate toroidal
295: dust region around the nucleus with a diameter of $\sim 3.6$~pc
296: (Alexander et al. 1999).
297:
298: \subsection{Photometry}
299:
300: We obtained photometry of the nuclear region
301: using Cen A images in the two observed
302: bandpasses by selecting a small aperture centered on the
303: nuclear region. We used an aperture with a diameter of 20
304: MIRAC/BLINC pixels, corresponding to $\sim 2.4$~arcsec, which is the
305: minimum aperture size which includes most of the PSF flux.
306: The photometric reference for the 8.8~$\mu$m image was
307: $\gamma$~Crux, which has a known flux of 1090~Jy
308: at that wavelength, with an estimated uncertainty of 5\%
309: (Gezari {\it et al.} 1987). For the N band we used the source IRC$+$10220 as a
310: reference. We estimated for this star an N band magnitude of $\sim
311: 1.5$~Jy, with a 30\% uncertainty, based on interpolation of the K magnitude
312: of 2.84 ($\sim 45$~Jy) and the IRAS 12~$\mu$m flux of $\sim 4$~Jy from
313: Gezari {\it et al.} (1987) (Table~1).
314:
315:
316: The photometry of the Cen A nuclear region was calculated separately
317: for the four nod/chop beams at each wavelength, which were then
318: averaged together. This procedure
319: ensured that the variation in the photometry of the four beams was
320: within our error estimate.
321: We also evaluated different sizes of the aperture and of the sky region
322: for residual background subtraction, from 1.5~arcsec to 5~arcsec,
323: finding similar values of the photometry, within our error bars ($\pm$1$\sigma$).
324: We obtained an average flux of 0.9~Jy at
325: 8.8~$\mu$m, with an uncertainty of $\pm 0.1$~Jy, and a flux of 1.4~Jy
326: in the N band, with an uncertainty of $\pm 0.5$~Jy (Table~1).
327: The significant uncertainties are due to the limited photometric
328: quality of the sky during these observations.
329: Larger aperture photometry
330: (several arcseconds aperture) does
331: not show significant differences within the error bars
332: with the smaller aperture results that
333: we are presenting in this paper.
334:
335: Our photometric results are in agreement
336: with the mid-IR observations obtained by
337: Whysong \& Antonucci (2002) using the Keck I telescope.
338: They detected emission from a compact unresolved nuclear source
339: (with an upper limit on the
340: size of $\sim 0.3''$) and measured fluxes of 1.6~Jy and 2.3~Jy
341: at 11.7~$\mu$m and 17.75~$\mu$m, respectively.
342:
343:
344: Our results are also in agreement within $\approx 3\sigma$
345: errors
346: with the ISOCAM CVF
347: spectrum obtained by Mirabel et al. (1999), which gives $\sim 0.7$~Jy
348: at 8.8~$\mu$m. In Figure 3 we plot our photometric results on
349: the ISOCAM CVF spectrum (see Fig. 2 in Mirabel et al. 1999).
350: The spectrum shows a broad
351: silicate absorption feature around 9.8~$\mu$m, resulting in a
352: lower flux at 10.3~$\mu$m with respect to 8.8~$\mu$m.
353:
354: Given the limited photometric and spectral accuracy of our mid-IR data
355: we cannot
356: discriminate between thermal emission from dust
357: and the emission from late-type stars photospheres, because we
358: essentially have only one color (the 8.8 micron filter
359: is inside the N filter waveband). It is also likely that
360: the eventual stellar radiation in the nuclear region is
361: below our sensitivity limit.
362: We therefore assume that the emission in the circumnuclear
363: region is thermal, originating from dust surrounding the inner hot region.
364:
365:
366: \subsection{Dust Temperature}
367:
368: Using the estimated size of the
369: circumnuclear region at 8.8$\mu$m and the flux measurements
370: based on our mid-IR observations, we derive an estimate
371: of the temperature of the emitting dust.
372: We assume that the emission is a black body
373: thermal emission, and that there is an absorbing component associated with the
374: dust lanes in front of the central source.
375: For
376: a simple spherical
377: geometry of the emitting region
378: we
379: estimate the dust temperature at 8.8~$\mu$m using the following
380: expression
381: derived from the Planck law:
382:
383:
384: \begin{equation}
385: T= 1440 \ \left[ \ln \left( 1+ 1.1 \cdot 10^5 \ \frac{R^2 \
386: e^{-\tau_\nu}}{D^2 \ F_\nu} \right) \right]^{-1}
387: \end{equation}
388:
389:
390:
391: \noindent
392: where $T$ is the dust temperature in K, $R$ is the radius of the region in
393: pc, $F_\nu$ is the
394: flux in Jy, and $\tau_\nu$ is
395: the optical depth of the dust lanes.
396:
397:
398: Using a radius of $\approx 1.5$~pc for the circumnuclear dust region,
399: flux of $0.9$~Jy, and $\tau_\nu \sim 1$ for the dust lanes optical
400: depth at $\sim 10$~$\mu$m, we estimate the dust temperature at
401: $\approx 160$~K.
402:
403:
404: We compare the temperature obtained using this simplified model with
405: the temperature derived from the ISOCAM spectra.
406: The multicomponent spectral fit (see Figure~3 in Alexander et al. 1999)
407: shows that the mid-IR emission from the circumnuclear region peaks at
408: 20~$\mu$m, which corresponds to a dust temperature of $T \simeq 150$~K.
409: This is in agreement with the estimated dust temperature of the
410: circumnuclear region based on our mid-IR
411: measurements.
412:
413:
414: \
415: \section{Conclusions}
416:
417: The results of our mid-IR imaging and photometry of the Cen A nuclear
418: region suggest that the emission originates from a resolved source
419: $\approx$3~pc in diameter. This emission is likely to be thermal
420: radiation from dust at $\approx$150~K
421: heated by UV/optical radiation from a ``hidden'' central AGN source
422: (e.g. Peterson 1997; Whysong \& Antonucci 2002). It is
423: possible that we
424: are detecting the external cooler region, possibly surrounding hotter
425: inner dust ($T \sim 1000$~K), as suggested by the deep silicate
426: absorption feature in the ISO spectra around 10~$\mu$m.
427:
428: Resolving the source of mid-IR emission in the nuclear region of Cen A
429: provides an important key for understanding dust formation
430: processes and the structure of the nuclear region of AGNs and quasars.
431: For example, the current ``unified'' model of AGNs predicts a
432: dusty torus with a size of $\sim 10$~Ly surrounding the accretion disk
433: and a black hole central engine (Antonucci and Miller 1985; Krolik
434: and Begelman 1988; Peterson 1997). The predicted size of the torus is
435: of the order of the measured size of the Cen A circumnuclear region
436: using our `mid-IR imaging. We note that the estimated size of the Cen A
437: circumnuclear region is also similar to the size of the dusty region
438: ($\sim 3$~pc) surrounding the central source of NGC~1068, recently
439: resolved AGN using the VLTI observations (ESA Press release 17/03).
440:
441: The measured size of the mid-IR emitting region is also
442: comparable to the distance from the central source at
443: which dust will condense in an outflowing
444: AGN wind. As recently demonstrated by Elvis {\it et al.} (2002),
445: dust can be created from cooling Broad Emission Line
446: clouds in AGN winds, and can survive in the quasar
447: environment due to self shielding.
448: This implies that Cen A could effectively be recycling dust from the
449: host galaxy
450: interstellar medium into IGM while changing the dust size and
451: distribution and the dust-to-gas ratio.
452: The possibility that AGN
453: or quasars
454: can provide
455: an additional path
456: for dust formation has important cosmological implications, since it
457: could explain in a
458: natural way the observed heavy obscuration of distant quasars (Omont
459: et al. 2001; Elvis {\it et al.} 2002), and provide a new means of
460: forming dust at early cosmological times.
461:
462: The current observations do not have enough accuracy to determine the
463: true geometry of the emitting region or to distinguish between
464: different geometries suggested by AGN models.
465: The observations were challenging because of the
466: limited telescope resolution.
467: Further multi-wavelength observations of Cen A with higher spatial
468: resolution
469: are crucial to explore the geometry of the extended nuclear region and
470: derive the
471: physical characteristics and the origin of the emission.
472: Multi band mid-IR observations combined with spectroscopy will allow
473: determination of the
474: characteristics of the circumnuclear dust, including its temperature,
475: and an estimate of the mass and mass loss rate.
476: The results may further constrain the unified AGN model, and models of dust
477: formation in quasar outflows.
478:
479:
480:
481:
482:
483: %==============================================================================
484: % Acknowledgements
485: %==============================================================================
486:
487: \acknowledgements
488: We thank the Magellan staff for their outstanding support. We are
489: grateful to
490: Dr. Scott Wolk for valuable suggestions and aid in preparing the
491: manuscript, and to the anonymous referee for useful comments
492: and suggestions.
493: M.~K. and M.~E. are
494: members of the Chandra X-ray Center, which is operated by the
495: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under contract to NASA
496: NAS8-39073.
497: This research was supported in part by NASA through the American
498: Astronomical Society's Small Research Grant Program.
499: MIRAC is supported through SAO and NSF grant AST 96-18850. BLINC is
500: supported through the NASA Navigator program.
501:
502: \clearpage
503:
504:
505: %==============================================================================
506: % References
507: %==============================================================================
508:
509: \begin{thebibliography}{}
510:
511:
512: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(1999)]{alexander1999} Alexander, D.M.,
513: Efstathiou, A., Hough, J.H., Aitken, D., Lutz, D., Roche, P., Sturm,
514: E. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 78.
515:
516: \bibitem[]{479} Antonucci, R.R.J., and Miller, J.S., 1985, \apj{}, 297,
517: 621
518:
519: \bibitem[Packham et al.(1996)]{packham1996} Packham, C., Hough, J.H.,
520: Young, S., Chrysostomou, A., Bailey, J.A., Axon, D.J., Ward,
521: M.J. 1996, \mnras{}, 278, 406
522:
523: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1994)]{draine1994} Draine, B.T., Lee,
524: H.M. 1994, \apj{}, 285, 89
525:
526: \bibitem[]{489}Elvis, M., Marengo, M., and Karovska, M., 2002, \apj{} Lett.,
527: 567, L107
528:
529: \bibitem[Foltz et al.(1999)]{foltz1999} Foltz, C.B, Williams, J.T.,
530: West, S.C., Fabricant, D.G., Martin, H.M. 1999, in proc. ``$16^{th}$
531: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference'',
532: eds. V. Piuri and M. Savino, p. 6333
533:
534: \bibitem[Gezari, Schmitz and Mead(1987)]{gezari1987} Gezari, D.Y.,
535: Schmitz, M., Mead, J.M. 1987, ``Catalog of Infrared Observations''
536: Part I, NASA Reference Publication 1196
537:
538:
539: \bibitem[Hoffmann et al.(1998)]{hoffmann1998} Hoffmann, W.F., Hora,
540: J.L., Fazio, G.G., Deutsch, L.K., Dayal, A. 1998, Proc. SPIE 3354,
541: 647
542:
543: \bibitem[]{506} Israel, F. P. 1998, AA Rev., 8, 237
544:
545: \bibitem[]{508} Karovska, M., {\it et al.} 2002, \apj{} 577, 114
546:
547: \bibitem[]{510} Krolik, J.H., and Begelman, M.C., 1988, \apj, 329, 702
548:
549: \bibitem[]{512} Marconi, A., Capetti, A., Axon, D. J., Koekemoer, A., Macchetto, D,
550: and Schreier, E. J. 2001, \apj, 549, 915
551:
552: \bibitem[]{515} Mirabel I.F., {\it et al.} 1999, A\&A, 341, 667
553: \bibitem[]{516}Omont, A., {\it et al.} 2001, A\&A, 374, 371
554:
555: \bibitem[]{518} Peterson, B. 1997, ``An Introduction to Active Galactic
556: Nuclei'', Cambridge University Press.
557:
558: \bibitem[]{522} Schiminovich, D., van Gorkom, J. H., van der Hulst, J. M.,
559: and Kasow, S. 1994, \apj, 423, L101
560:
561: \bibitem[] {}Shectman, S. \& Johns, M. 2003, SPIE 4837, 910
562:
563: \bibitem[]{526} Whysong, D., Antonucci, R. 2002, astro-ph/0207385.
564:
565:
566:
567:
568: \end{thebibliography}
569:
570:
571: \clearpage
572:
573:
574:
575: %==============================================================================
576: % Tables
577: %==============================================================================
578:
579: \begin{table}
580: \begin{scriptsize}
581: \begin{center}
582: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
583: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\scriptsize TABLE 1}\\
584: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\scriptsize MID-IR PHOTOMETRY}\\
585: \hline
586: \hline
587: Source &
588: Wavelength &
589: Photometry \\
590: \hline
591: \hline
592: Cen A & 8.8~\micron & 0.9 ($\pm$ 0.1) Jy \\
593: Cen A & 10.3~\micron & 1.4 ($\pm$ 0.5) Jy \\
594: \hline
595: $\gamma$ Crux & 8.8~\micron & 1009 ($\pm$ 50) Jy \\
596: IRC$+$10220 & 10.3~\micron & 1.5 ($\pm$ 0.4) Jy \\
597: \hline
598: \hline
599: \end{tabular}
600: \end{center}
601: \end{scriptsize}
602: \end{table}
603:
604:
605:
606: \clearpage
607:
608:
609:
610:
611: %==============================================================================
612: % Figure Captions
613: %==============================================================================
614: \figcaption[f1.eps]{MIRAC/BLINC Images of Cen A (left) and the reference star
615: $\gamma$~Crux (right) at 8.8~$\mu$m. North is rotated 126 degrees to
616: the left (from the vertical)\label{fig1}}
617:
618:
619: \figcaption[f2.eps]{Radial profiles of Cen A image (solid line) and of the
620: reference image (dashed line) at 8.8~$\mu$m. The radial
621: profile of Cen A appears more extended when compared to the radial
622: profile of the reference star, indicating therefore that Cen A is
623: resolved.\label{fig2}}
624:
625: \figcaption[f3.eps]{ISOCAM CVF spectrum of the nuclear region (4"
626: radius) of Cen A (Mirabel {\it at al.} 1999 showing several emission
627: lines and a deep silicate absorption feature
628: at $\sim $9~$\mu$m. Also plotted are the results from our
629: 8.8$\mu$m and N band photometry of the 2.4'' region centered on the nucleus.\label{fig3}}
630:
631:
632: \clearpage
633:
634:
635: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
636: % Include figures
637: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
638:
639: \epsscale{0.85} \plotone{f1.eps} \clearpage
640: \epsscale{0.85} \plotone{f2.eps} \clearpage
641: \epsscale{0.85} \plotone{f3.eps} \clearpage
642:
643: % End of document
644: \end{document}
645:
646: