1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: %\documentclass{emulateapj}

4: %\documentclass{aastex}

5: \begin{document}

6: 

7: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

8: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

9: \def\lesssim{\raisebox{-0.3ex}{\mbox{$\stackrel{<}{_\sim} \,$}}}

10: \def\gtrsim{\raisebox{-0.3ex}{\mbox{$\stackrel{>}{_\sim} \,$}}}

11: 

12: \title{The intrinsic intensity modulation of PSR B1937+21 at 1410 MHz}

13: 

14: \author{Fredrick A. Jenet \altaffilmark{1}, Janusz Gil\altaffilmark{2}}

15: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory\\ 4800 Oak Grove Drive,Pasadena, CA

16: 91109} \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Astronomy, University of Zibeline G\'ora \\Lubuska 2, 65-265, Zibeline

17: G\'ora, Poland}

18: 

19: 

20: \begin{abstract}

21: The single-pulse properties of the millisecond radio pulsar PSR

22: B1937+21 are studied in the 1410 MHz radio band. Aside from occasional

23: ``giant pulses'' occurring in restricted regions of pulse phase, the

24: emission appears to be remarkably stable, showing no pulse-to-pulse

25: fluctuations other then those induced by propagation through the

26: interstellar medium. This type of behavior has not been seen in any

27: other pulsar although it was seen in previous 430 MHz observations of

28: this source. 

29: 

30: The stability of PSR B1937+21 can be understood in the context of the

31: sparking gap model of radio pulsar emission. Given the emission

32: properties of this source at 430 MHz, this model predicts that the

33: emission at all higher frequencies will be just as stable. Since the

34: stability depends on the outflow velocity of the emitting plasma, an

35: upper bound may be placed on its Lorentz factor.

36: 

37: \end{abstract}

38: \keywords{pulsars:general, pulsars:individual (PSR B1937+21)}

39: \section{Introduction}

40: 

41: %pulsar emission blurb

42: %Sparking gap model and frequency dependence

43: %mention the upper bound from the Strappers paper

44: %Discuss previous modulation index vs frequency studies

45: 

46: %Understanding the physics of the radio pulsar emission mechanism has

47: %long troubled pulsar astrophysicists. The wide variety of

48: %phenomenology (REFERENCES) coupled together with the wide range of

49: %physical parameters over which the emission mechanisim operates

50: %(REFERENCES) have made these objects very difficult to understand. In

51: %an attempt to understand one aspect of pulsar phenomenology, namely

52: %the intensity fluctuations properties, \citet{jg03} have proposed that

53: %the intrinsic intensity fluctuations are related to a pulsar's period

54: %and period derivitive. Such a relationship, refered to as a Modulation

55: %Index Relationship (MIR), is a logical consequence of the spark gap

56: %model originally proposed by \citet{rs75} and later reworked in more

57: %detail by \citet{gs00}.

58: 

59: %\citet{jg03} speculate that other types of

60: %emission models may also predict a MIR, but the exact functional

61: %dependence will depend on the particular model in question. For all

62: %cases discussed in JG03, the source of the radio emission is

63: %assumed to be seperate from the source of the intensity

64: %modulation. The former is due to some unknown short time scale

65: %coherent process within the outflowing plasma while the latter is due

66: %to a longer time scale instability of the plasma flow itself. If the

67: %emission and modulation processes are completely independent, then one

68: %would not expect to see any dependence between the intensity

69: %modulation and the observing frequency. Thus the relationship between

70: %the modulation index and the emitted radio frequency will provied an

71: %important piece of information in determining the physics behind

72: %pulsar emission. (NEED TO MENTION PREVIOUS WORK ON THIS AND HOW IT

73: %FITS IN)

74: 

75: This letter reports on observations of the radio pulsar PSR B1937+21

76: taken with a center frequency of 1410 MHz at the 305m Arecibo radio

77: telescope in Puerto Rico. Previous observations of this source at 430

78: MHz revealed a behavior that was completely different from other known

79: sources \citep[]{jenal01}. At 430 MHz this source

80: exhibits almost no detectable pulse-to-pulse fluctuations. Occasional bursts

81: of radio radiation, or ``giant pulses'', are observed but they are

82: restricted to small regions in pulse phase \citep{kt00, cst+96}. The

83: observations presented here show that this remarkable pulse-to-pulse

84: stability of the non-giant pulse emission also occurs at 1410 MHz.

85: \citet{es03} attempted to measure the modulation properties of PSR

86: B1937+21 at 1300 MHz with the Westerbork synthesis radio

87: telescope. Unfortunately, the signal-to-noise ratio in their

88: observations was not high enough to measure the pulse-to-pulse

89: properties.

90: 

91: Observations of bright pulsars have shown that the shapes and

92: intensities of individual pulses are unique, although they average

93: together to form a stable mean profile. The characteristic widths of

94: individual pulses, typically referred to as sub-pulses, are usually

95: smaller than the average profile width. This typical behavior has not been

96: detected in the pulses from PSR B1937+21. Instead, this source appears

97: to be highly stable in the sense that each pulse is identical to the

98: next.

99: 

100: %Some

101: %pulsars show rapid intensity fluctuations or micro-structure. The time

102: %scales of these fluctuations vary from source to source and they range

103: %from 1 ms down to 2 ns \citep{hkw+03}.

104: 

105: %only an upperbound could be placed on

106: %the modulation index due to the low luminoisty of the source at high

107: %frequencies.

108: 

109: %The 430 MHz observations together with the 1400 MHz observations

110: %presented here will help us to understand the physics of the pulsar

111: %emission process. Of particular relavance is the question of what is

112: %causing the pulsar intensity modulation.

113: 

114: 

115: %The modulation may occur in three places:

116: 

117: %provide interesting clues that may help solve the mystery of the pulsar emission process.

118: 

119: %may offer some insight into the physics of the pulsar

120: %emission process.

121: 

122: % These observations, together with the 430 MHz

123: %observations can offer some insight into the physics of the pulsar

124: %emission process. The observed modulation maybe

125: 

126: It will be shown that the stability of this source at both frequencies

127: can be understood within the context of the sparking gap model of

128: pulsar emission originally proposed by \citet{rs75} and later reworked

129: in more detail by \citet[][ hereafter GS00] {gs00}. In this model, the

130: stability is a result of a large number of emission regions, or

131: ``sparks'', occurring on the polar cap. The GS00 model predicts that if

132: the emission is stable at a given frequency, then it will be stable at

133: all higher frequencies. Since this stability will also depend on the

134: velocity of the emitting plasma, an upper bound may be placed on its Lorentz factor.

135: 

136: %It will be shown that if the

137: %pulsar emission is stable at a given frequency, the GS00 model

138: %predicts that the emission will be stable at all higher

139: %frequencies. It will also be shown that an upper bound may be placed

140: %on the Lorentz factor $\gamma$ of the emitting plasma.

141: 

142: %As will be shown,

143: %these observation can put constraints on the relativistic gamma factor

144: %of the outflowing emitting plasma.

145: 

146: %The behaviour of this source at 430 MHz maybe explained in

147: %the context of the sparking gap models of \citet{rw75} and

148: %\citet{gs00}. In these models, the observed emission arises from

149: %plasma columns streaming along field lines. These columns are generated

150: %by vaccuum discharges, or ``sparks'', occuring on the surface of the

151: %star near the magnetic pole. The more sparks occuring on the surface,

152: %the less pulse-to-pulse modulation is expected to be seen. A

153: %preliminary investigation by \citet{jg03} showed evidence for spark

154: %gap models by measuring a correlations between a pulsar's

155: %pulse-to-pulse intensity fluctuations and a function of its period and

156: %period derivative. If the pulsar emission is stable at a given

157: %frequency, the sparking gap model predicts that the emission will be

158: %stable at all higher frequencies. Thus, these observations provided

159: %evidence in favor of sparking gap models.

160: 

161: 

162: %Since the

163: %number of sparks occuring on the surface maybe estimated by a function

164: %of the pulsar period and period derivative, the pulse-to-pulse

165: %intensity fluctuations are expected to depend on the

166: 

167: %Remarkabley

168: %enough, this source exhibits the same single pulse stability at 1400

169: %MHz as seen at 430 MHz.

170: 

171: 

172: 

173: %Within the paradigm of the models discussed in JG03, this result

174: %suggests that the emission process is independent of the modulation

175: %process.

176: 

177: %Although several models are discussed in JG03, only the sparking gap

178: %model studied by GS00 is currently detailed enough to make

179: %quantitative predictions for the functional form of the MIR and for

180: %the frequency dependence of the modulation index. In the context of

181: %the GS00 model, the modulation index of the non-giant pulse emission

182: %from PSR B1937+21 is expected to be independent of frequency. Hence

183: %the prediction of the GS00 model is in agreement with the observed

184: %properties of PSR B1937+21.

185: 

186: 

187: The sparking-gap model of \citet{rs75} and its revised form (GS00)

188: have received much attention in recent years.  They have been used to

189: interpret the sub-pulse properties of slow pulsar conal emission

190: \citep{esv03,rr03,vsr+03,ad01,dr01} and of millisecond pulsars core

191: emission \citep{es03}. These models have also been used in pulsar

192: population studies \citep{acc02,fcm01}. Given their widespread use, it

193: is important to develop observational tests which can determine the

194: validity of these models. Since the GS00 model predicts that the radio

195: emission from PSR B1937+21 should be stable at all frequencies higher

196: than 430 MHz, high frequency observations of this source will test

197: the current form of the GS00 model.

198: 

199: %The frequency dependence of the pulse

200: %stability provides one such test.

201: 

202: The next section describes the 1410 MHz observations performed at the

203: Arecibo radio observatory. It also describes the techniques used to

204: measure the intrinsic fluctuation properties of this source. Section 3

205: discusses the sparking gap model in more detail with emphasis on the

206: frequency dependence of the modulation index. This letter is

207: summarized in section 4.

208: 

209: %Goals: 1)Report on the 1400 MHz observations

210: %       2)Place them in context of Sparking Gap Model and previous letter

211: 

212: \section{Observations and Analysis}

213: The data were taken at the 305 m Arecibo radio telescope using the

214: 1400 MHz Gregorian dome receiver. The observation lasted two hours and

215: approximately 4.5 million pulses were obtained. The exact center

216: frequency used was 1410 MHz. Both circular polarizations were two-bit

217: complex sampled at a rate of 10 MHz (100 ns) and recorded to tape

218: using the Caltech baseband recorder \citep{jenal98}. Further

219: processing of the data were performed at the Caltech Center for

220: Advanced Computation and Research (CACR) using a 256 processor

221: Hewlett-Packard Exemplar. The two-bit complex samples were unpacked

222: and assigned optimum values in order to minimize signal distortion

223: \citep{ja98}. The dual polarization voltage data was adjusted using an

224: empirically derived cross-talk matrix \citep{sti82}. The effect of the

225: Earth's motion around the Sun was removed by resampling the complex

226: voltage data at a rate necessary to transform the data into the

227: barycentric frame. This rate was calculated using the software package

228: TEMPO\footnote{http://pulsar.princeton.edu/tempo}. The effects of

229: interstellar dispersion were removed by coherently dedispersing the

230: data \citep{jenal98,hr75} at a dispersion measure of 71.0249 pc

231: $\mbox{cm}^3$ \citep{jenal01}.

232: 

233: As with the 430 MHz observations, the single pulses from PSR B1937+21

234: at 1410 MHz are not bright enough to use conventional single pulse

235: analysis techniques. Hence, the low intensity analysis methods used

236: by \citet{es03} and \citet{jenal01} are used here. Typically, a pulsar

237: exhibits pulse-to-pulse shape variability and intensity

238: fluctuations. Three statistical techniques are used to determine if

239: these phenomena are occurring in this source.  First, the phase

240: resolved modulation index is calculated in order to determine if any

241: pulse-to-pulse amplitude fluctuations are present. Second, the average

242: intensity fluctuation spectrum \citep{bac73} is calculated to

243: determine the time scale of the modulation. Third, the average

244: autocorrelation function (ACF) and the ACF of the average profile are

245: calculated and compared to each other in order to determine if there

246: are any pulse-to-pulse shape variations occurring. Pulse-to-pulse

247: fluctuations may be intrinsic to the source or due to propagation

248: through the ISM. The magnitude of the modulation index, the time scale

249: of the modulation, and the existence of any pulse shape variations can

250: be used to discriminate between intrinsic and ISM induced

251: pulse-to-pulse variations.

252: 

253: 

254: %Throughout this letter, $\phi$ is pulse phase and $\Delta

255: %\phi$ is the ACF phase lag. The procedures for calculating these

256: %quantities and removing the effects of the receiver noise are

257: %discussed in \cite{jenal01,es03}.

258: 

259: The average pulse profile, $<I_s(\phi)>$, normalized by its peak value

260: is shown in figure \ref{figure3}. $I_s(\phi)$ is the signal intensity

261: at pulse phase $\phi$ and the angle brackets, $<>$, represent averaging

262: over the ensemble of 4.5 million single pulses. The average profile

263: consists of two components separated by about 520 milli-periods

264: (mP). Note that only a small temporal region of length 425 $\mu$s (273

265: mP) is shown around each component with a time resolution of .42 $\mu

266: s$. The giant pulses occur between 35 and 40 mP near the primary

267: component and between 560 and 565 mP in the secondary component. The

268: autocorrelation function of the average profile, $C_{<I_s>}(\Delta

269: \phi)$, is calculated for each component separately and compared to

270: the average autocorrelation function, $<C_{I_s}(\Delta \phi)>$, of

271: each component. These correlation functions are defined as:

272: \begin{eqnarray}

273: C_{<I_s>}(\Delta \phi) &=& \frac{1}{\phi_1 - \phi_0} \int_{\phi_0}^{\phi_1} <I_s(\phi)><I_s(\phi + \Delta \phi)> d\phi \\

274: <C_{I_s}>(\Delta \phi) &=& \frac{1}{\phi_1 - \phi_0}<\int_{\phi_0}^{\phi_1} I_s(\phi)I_s(\phi + \Delta \phi) d\phi >,

275: \end{eqnarray}

276: where $\phi_0$ and $\phi_1$ are the starting and ending pulse phases of

277: the given emission component, respectively, and $\Delta \phi$ is the

278: phase lag. Note that cyclic boundary conditions are assumed when

279: evaluating the above expressions for the case when $\phi + \Delta

280: \phi$ lies outside the interval $[\phi_0,\phi_1]$.  If the individual

281: pulses have identical shapes from pulse-to-pulse, then these two

282: autocorrelation function will have identical shapes. Figure

283: \ref{figure1} shows both autocorrelation functions plotted together for each

284: component. When calculating the average ACF, $<C_{I_s}>$, the high

285: resolution ACF was rebined to a time resolution of 3.2 $\mu s$ (2.05 mP)

286: in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. All the of ACFs were

287: normalized by their value at $\Delta \phi = 2.05$ mP. This corresponds to

288: the second phase-lag bin of the rebined average ACF and was chosen to

289: avoid the noise spike occurring in the first bin of the rebined

290: average ACF. The solid line represents $C_{<I_s>}(\Delta \phi)$ while

291: the filled circles represent $<C_{I_s}(\Delta \phi)>$. Each

292: polarization was analyzed separately and the resulting ACFs were

293: averaged together. The error bars where calculated using the number of

294: points averaged together within each bin and the root-mean-square (RMS) of the

295: data within each bin. The error bars represent the $95\%$ confidence

296: range. Note that even though the giant pulses are included in the

297: ACF analysis, they will have little effect since they are very narrow

298: and they occur infrequently.

299: 

300:  The phase resolved modulation index is defined as

301: \begin{equation}

302: m(\phi) =\frac{ \sqrt{<I_s(\phi)^2> -<I_s(\phi)>^2}}{<I_s(\phi)>}.

303: \end{equation}

304: $m(\phi)$ is a measure of the pulse-to-pulse variation in

305: intensity. Again, both polarization were analyzed separately and the

306: resulting modulation indices were averaged together. In order to

307: increase the signal-to-noise ratio, both $<I_s(\phi)>$ and

308: $<I_s(\phi)^2>$ were rebined to a time resolution of 3.3 $\mu s$ (2.1

309: mP) before calculating $m(\phi)$. The error bars where calculated

310: using the number of points averaged within each bin and the RMS values

311: of $<I_s(\phi)>$ and $<I_s(\phi)^2>$ within each bin. The error bars

312: represent the $95\%$ confidence range. If the amplitude of each pulse

313: is constant and the only remaining fluctuations are due to a Gaussian

314: statistical process, then $m(\phi)$ will be equal to 1\footnote{Note that this

315: definition of $m$ is slightly different from the typical definition

316: which averages down the noise before calculating $m$. In that case, $m

317: =0$ if no pulse-to-pulse fluctuations were present.}. Figure

318: \ref{figure2} plots $m(\phi)$ for both components. Only the phase

319: region where a significant measurement could be made is shown. The

320: modulation index is consistent with being constant across each

321: component as expected if all pulses have the same shape. The average

322: value of the modulation index is 1.37 $\pm 0.06$ and 1.54 $\pm 0.2$

323: for the main and secondary components, respectively.

324: 

325: Since pulse-to-pulse modulation is detected, it is necessary to determine if it is intrinsic to the pulsar or a

326: result of propagation through the ISM. The expected modulation index due to the ISM alone is given by

327: \citep{jenal01}:

328: \begin{equation}

329: m = \sqrt{1 + \frac{2}{N}},

330: \end{equation}

331: where $N$ is the number of scintills in the band. $N$ may be estimated by \citep{cwd+90}:

332: \begin{equation}

333: \label{sism}

334: N = 1 + \eta \frac{B}{\delta \nu},

335: \end{equation}

336: where $B$ is the observing bandwidth, $\delta \nu$ is the

337: decorrelation bandwidth and $\eta$ is a packing fraction which lies

338: between 0.1 and 0.2. Using a decorrelation bandwidth of 1.1 MHz at

339: 1410 \citep{cor86}, m is expected to be within 1.38 and 1.48. The two

340: dashed lines in Figure \ref{figure2} represent these two values. The

341: time scale of the fluctuations were determined by calculating the

342: average intensity fluctuation spectrum for both pulse components. Each

343: spectrum is consistent with zero power down to a frequency of $0.02$

344: $s^{-1}$. At this point, the spectrum starts to rise. This type of

345: spectrum is indicative of the short time scale fluctuations induced by

346: the ISM. The characteristic time scale as determined by that frequency

347: where the power falls to half its maximum value is given by 125 s,

348: consistent with that measured by \citet{cor86}. Since the magnitude

349: and time scale of the observed fluctuations are consistent with that

350: expected for the ISM, it is concluded that these fluctuations are

351: primarily due to ISM propagation and not due to intrinsic

352: pulse-to-pulse fluctuations.

353: 

354: %Using spectral

355: %analysis techniques on the data, the average number of scintills in

356: %the band was estimated to be ??.

357: 

358: %First, the average number of ISM scintils in the

359: %observating band was determined using synthetic filterbank

360: %techniques. The high resolution voltage time series was divided into

361: %128 frequency channels. The resulting time series were used to

362: %generate dynamic power spectra (REFERENCE) averaged over 100 s. The

363: %number of bright features, or scintils, occuring in the band was then

364: %counted. The average number of scintills is ??.

365: 

366: 

367: \begin{figure}

368: \caption{\label{figure3}Average Pulse Profile of PSR B1937+21}

369: \plotone{f3.eps}

370: \end{figure}

371: 

372: \begin{figure}

373: \caption{\label{figure1}Autocorrelation functions of the primary and secondary components.}

374: 

375: %The filled circles are the average ACF while the solid line is the ACF of the average profile.}

376: 

377: %The filled circles are the average ACF with a time resolution of 3.2 $\mu s$ (2.05 mP) and the solid line is the ACF of the average profile with a time resolution of .42 $\mu s$ (.28 mP). The error bars represent the 95\% confidence region.}

378: \plotone{f2.eps}

379: \end{figure}

380: 

381: \begin{figure}

382: \caption{\label{figure2}The phase resolved modulation indices of the primary and secondary components.}

383: %Only the regions where a significant measurement could be made is shown. The ISM induced modulation index is expected to lie within the two dotted lines. The error bars represent the 95\% confidence region.}

384: \plotone{f1.eps}

385: \end{figure}

386: 

387: 

388: 

389: \section{Intensity modulation and the sparking gap model}

390: 

391: These results can be understood in the context of the GS00 model. In

392: this model, a region of low charged particle density forms just above

393: the surface of the polar cap. This ``vacuum gap'' is postulated to

394: contain a number of localized plasma discharges or ``sparks''. The

395: plasma generated in each spark moves upwards following the local

396: magnetic field. At some point, processes within the spark associated

397: plasma generate the observed radiation with higher frequencies being

398: emitted at lower altitudes \citep{mgp00,glm03}. The minimum distance

399: between two adjacent sparks on the pulsar's surface is approximately

400: given by the height of the vacuum gap, $h$ (see GS00 for

401: details). Assuming that the polar cap is populated as densely as

402: possible by these sparks, the total number of sparks on the cap is

403: estimated by $a^2$ where $a$ is given by

404: \begin{equation}

405: a=\frac{r_p}{h} \label{a},

406: \end{equation}

407: $r_p=10^4R_6^{1.5}P^{-0.5}$ cm is the radius of the polar cap, 

408: $R_6$ is the neutron star radius in units of $10^6$ cm,  and $P$ is

409: the pulsar period in seconds.

410: %is a parameter that depends on the physics of the vacuum

411: %(see \ref{gm02} for details). For the vacuum gap model of RS75, $y=1$, while the near-threshold vacuum gap of

412: %\citet{gm02} has $y=2.5$.

413: $a$ is called the complexity parameter since it was shown by GS00 that

414: $a$ is correlated with the profile morphology described by \citet{r83}. Conal single

415: profiles have the lowest values of $a$, followed by conal doubles and

416: multiples and then by triple and core singles. Since $a$ is

417: proportional to the number of sparks that would emit into the

418: observers line of site, the pulse-to-pulse modulation is expected to

419: be anticorrelated with $a$. Possible evidence for this correlation is

420: discussed in \citep{jg03}. PSR B1937+21 has the highest complexity

421: parameter of all pulsars whose single pulse properties are

422: known. Hence, its stability is a result of the large number of sparks

423: occurring on its polar cap.

424: 

425: A large number of sparks on the surface is not quite enough to

426: guarantee that the individual pulses will be stable. The emission from

427: each spark-associated plasma column must overlap each other in order to

428: average out the fluctuations. Since the spark plasma is moving out

429: along the magnetic field at relativistic speeds, the angular width of

430: the radiation pattern, $\Theta_r$, will be given by

431: \begin{equation}

432: \Theta_r = \frac{1}{\gamma},

433: \label{tr}

434: \end{equation}

435: with $\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - (v/c)^2}$, $v$ is the velocity of the spark

436: associated plasma in the radio emission region, and $c$ is the speed

437: of light. As the spark plasma moves up along the magnetic field lines,

438: its radiation will be beamed in a direction tangent to the local

439: magnetic field line. Hence, the radiation from two sparks that

440: originate near each other on the polar cap will be emitted into

441: different directions. For a dipolar field, it turns out that the

442: angle, $\Delta \theta$, between the radiation beams from two adjacent

443: sparks will be given by

444: \begin{equation}

445: \Delta \theta = \frac{0.015}{R_6}\frac{\Delta d}{r_p}r_6^{\frac{1}{2}}P^{-\frac{1}{2}}, \label{dth}

446: \end{equation}

447: where $\Delta d$ is the distance between adjacent sparks on the polar

448: cap (see GS00 for details), $r_6$ is the emission altitude normalized

449: by the neutron star radius $R=R_610^6$

450: cm. In order for the emission from adjacent sparks to overlap, the

451: following condition must be met

452: \begin{equation}

453: \Delta \theta < \Theta_r.

454: \label{teq}

455: \end{equation}

456: When the above equation is satisfied, the emission from adjacent

457: sparks will overlap and the corresponding radio emission will show

458: very little pulse-to-pulse intensity fluctuations provided that $a$ is

459: large. From Equations \ref{a}, \ref{tr}, and \ref{dth} one can rewrite

460: equation \ref{teq} as

461: \begin{equation}

462: \gamma < \frac{a R_6}{0.015}\left(\frac{P}{r_6}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}},

463: \label{gamma2}

464: \end{equation}

465: where $\Delta d$ was taken to be equal to $h$. If

466: the emission from a given altitude satisfies the above condition, then

467: emission from lower altitudes will also satisfy this condition. Hence,

468: if emission from a given altitude is observed to be stable, then

469: emission from all lower altitudes will also be stable. Observations of

470: other pulsars point to the existence of a ``radius-to-frequency''

471: mapping which states that higher frequencies are emitted at lower

472: altitudes \citep[e.g.][]{kg03}. Assuming that this holds for PSR

473: B1937+21, the pulses emitted at 1410 MHz are expected to be at least

474: as stable as those emitted at 430 MHz.

475: 

476: Since the observations are in agreement with the sparking gap model

477: described above, one can go one step further and use Equation

478: \ref{gamma2} to place an upper bound,$\gamma_{max}$, on the Lorentz

479: factor of the emitting plasma. The following form of the radius-to-frequency

480: map will be used \citep{kg03}:

481: \begin{equation}

482: r_6(\nu_{GHz}) = 40 \nu_{GHz}^{-0.26} \dot{P}_{-15}^{0.07} P^{0.3},

483: \end{equation}

484: where $\nu_{GHz}$ is the observing frequency in GHz and

485: $\dot{P}_{-15}$ is the pulsar period derivative in $10^{-15}$ s/s. For

486: PSR B1937+21, $r_6(0.43) = 3.8$ and $a = 23$. Hence, Equation

487: \ref{gamma2} yields $\gamma_{\mbox{max}} = 31R_6$. This estimate

488: assumes the standard vacuum gap model described by RS75. For the case

489: of the near threshold vacuum gap (NTVG) model \citep{gm02}, $a$ can be

490: up to about 3 times higher then that estimated from equation \ref{a} since

491: $a$ will

492: depend on the actual value of the surface magnetic field line radius of curvature. In this case, $\gamma_{\mbox{max}} = 91R_6$.

493: 

494: %In general, the dependence of $a$ and $\Delta d$ on $h$ and $r_p$ is

495: %determined by the physics of the vacuum gap.

496: 

497: %the complexity parameter in GS00 model $a=23$ and $r_6(0.43) =

498: %5.5$. The maximum value of $\gamma$ calculated from equation (10) is

499: %$26R_6$.

500: 

501:  %and can be larger even by a factor of 3.5 in

502: %the near threshold vacuum gap model due to larger values od $a$

503: %\citep{gm02}. Since the neutron star radius supposed to be smaller

504: %than about 20 km, the absolute upper limit for the Lorentz factor in

505: %millisecond pulsars is about 150 and can be as low as about 25. The

506: %values of Lorentz factors should not be considerably smaller than 100

507: %(REFERENCE), which means that the near threshold conditions should be

508: %involved in the vacuum gap formation \citep{GM02}.

509: 

510: %This is lower than the value expected which is in the hundreds \citep{glm03}. This strongly suggests that the

511: %neutron star radius $R>15$~km.

512: 

513: %Under the assumption that all millisecond pulsars have about the same

514: %$\gamma$ factor for the emitting plasma, the spark gap model may be

515: %used to predict the modulation properties of other millisecond

516: %pulsars. One interesting case is that of the nearby bright pulsar PSR

517: %J0437-4715. This is the only millisecond pulsar that is bright enough

518: %to study single pulses using conventional methods. 

519: 

520: %Of particular interest is the nearby bright 

521: 

522: 

523: %{\bf Interestingly, another millisecond pulsar PSR

524: %J0437-4715 reveals pulse-to-pulse intensity fluctuations similar to

525: %those observed in normal pulsars \citep{jenal98}. For this pulsar with

526: %$P=0.0057$~s and $\dot{P}_{-15}=0.000057$, $a\approx 8$ and

527: %$r_6(0.43)\approx 8$.  Thus, the two millisecond pulsars with very

528: %different fluctuation properties have considerably different values of

529: %the complexity parameter, in consistency with predictions of the

530: %sparking gap model of GS00. In fact, it follows from Eq.~(10) that in

531: %PSR J0437-4715 the requested Lorentz factors $\gamma<15R_6$, which is

532: %almost twice smaller than in PSR B1937+21. It seems that all

533: %millisecond pulsars should have about the same Lorentz factors,

534: %probably few times larger than the maximum value following for PSR

535: %J0473-4715 from equation (10). Thus, within the sparking gap model the

536: %fluctuation properties of a pulsar are determined by the complexity

537: %parameter rather than pulsar period.

538: %}

539: 

540: 

541: \section{Summary and Discussion}

542: 

543: Radio observations of the millisecond pulsar PSR B1937+21 were taken

544: at a center frequency of 1410 MHz. Statistical techniques were used to

545: determine if this source exhibits any of the standard single pulse

546: phenomenology that has been seen in other radio pulsars. Remarkably,

547: none of the usual phenomena were detected. The data are consistent

548: with each pulse having the same shape and intensity. Previously,

549: \citet{jenal01} showed that this source exhibits the same single pulse

550: stability at 430 MHz. This stability is currently unique to this

551: source. Hence, PSR B1937+21 maybe the prototype for a new class of

552: radio pulsars. On the other hand, the sparking gap model provides a

553: unified framework that can explain this source's behaviour as an

554: extreme case of the normal pulsar emission process. In the context of

555: the GS00 model, the stability is a result of a large number of sparks

556: occurring on the polar cap together with a low Lorentz factor of the

557: emitting plasma. Since the 430 MHz observations show no pulse-to-pulse

558: fluctuations, the GS00 model predicts that all higher frequencies will

559: be just as stable provided higher frequencies are emitted at lower

560: altitudes. This result is independent of the exact physical model used

561: to describe the vacuum gap. Future observations of this source at

562: several frequencies above 430 MHz will further test the GS00 model. If

563: fluctuations are seen, then the current form of the sparking gap model

564: is incorrect. Observations of this source at frequencies below 430 MHz

565: will enable a better measurement of the Lorentz factor. If

566: pulse-to-pulse fluctuations are seen at lower frequencies, a lower

567: bound may be placed on $\gamma$ for a given model of the vacuum gap.

568: %(This gamma factor as compared to the outflow model of Li(??) which predicts

569: %a low frequency cuttof)

570: 

571: \acknowledgements 

572: 

573: Part of this research was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

574: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National

575: Aeronautics and Space Administration. GJ acknowledges the support of

576: the Polish State Committee for scientific research under grant 2 P03D 008 19.

577: 

578: \begin{thebibliography}{}

579: %\bibitem[Arons \& Scharlemann(1979)]{as79} Arons, J., \& Scharlemann, E. T., ApJ, 231, 854

580: \bibitem[Arzoumanian, Chernoff, \& Cordes(2002)]{acc02} Arzoumanian, Z., Chernoff, D.~F., \& Cordes, J.~M.\ 2002, \apj, 568, 289

581: %\bibitem[Asseo \& Melikidze(1998)]{am98} Asseo, E., \& Melikidze, G.I., 1998, MNRAS 301, 59

582: \bibitem[Asgekar \& Deshpande(2001)]{ad01} Asgekar, A.~\& Deshpande, A.~A.\ 2001, \mnras, 326, 1249

583: \bibitem[Backer(1973)]{bac73} Backer, D.~C.\ 1973, \apj, 182, 245

584: \bibitem[Cognard et al.(1996)]{cst+96} Cognard, I., Shrauner, J. A., Taylor, J. H., \& Thorsett, S.E. 1996, \apj,457,L81

585: \bibitem[Cordes(1986)]{cor86} Cordes, J. M. 1986, \apj, 331, 183

586: \bibitem[Cordes et al.(1990)]{cwd+90} Cordes, J. M., Wolszczan, A., Dewey, R. J., Blaskiewicz, M., \& Stinebring, D. R. 1990, \apj, 349, 245

587: \bibitem[Deshpande \& Rankin(2001)]{dr01} Deshpande, A.~A.~\& Rankin, J.~M.\ 2001, \mnras, 322, 438

588: %\bibitem[Deshpande \& Rankin(1999)]{dr99} Deshpande, A. A., \& Rankin, J. M. 1999, ApJ, 524, 1008

589: %\bibitem[Drake \& Craft(1968)]{dc68}Drake, F. D., \& Craft, H. D., Jr. 1968, Nature, 220, 231

590: \bibitem[Edwards \& Stappers(2003)]{es03} Edwards, R.~T.~\& Stappers, B.~W.\ 2003, \aap, 407, 273

591: \bibitem[Edwards, Stappers, \& van Leeuwen(2003)]{esv03} Edwards, R.~T., Stappers, B.~W., \& van Leeuwen, A.~G.~J.\ 2003, \aap, 402, 321

592: \bibitem[Fan, Cheng, \& Manchester(2001)]{fcm01} Fan, G. L., Cheng, K. S., \& Manchester, R. N. 2001, ApJ, 557, 297

593: %\bibitem[Gangadhara(2003)]{g03} Gangadhara, R. T. 2003, ApJ, 584,418

594: \bibitem[Gil \& Sendyk(2000)]{gs00} Gil, J., \& Sendyk, M. 2000, \apj, 541, 351 (GS00)

595: \bibitem[Gil, Lyubarski \& Melikidze(2003)]{glm03} Gil, J., Lyubarski, Y.,

596: \& Melikidze, G. 2003, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0301621)

597: %\bibitem[Gil \& Mitra(2001)]{gm01} Gil, J. \& Mitra, D. 2001, ApJ, 550, 383 (GM01)

598: \bibitem[Gil \& Melikidze(2002)]{gm02} Gil, J. \& Melikidze, G.I. 2002, ApJ, 577, 909

599: %\bibitem[Gil, Melikidze \& Geppert(2003)]{gmg03} Gil, J., Melikidze, G.I. \& Geppert,

600: %U., 2003, A\&A, 407,315

601: %\bibitem[Gupta \& Gangadhara(2003)]{gg03} Gupta, Y., Gangadhara, R.T. 2003, ApJ, 584, 418

602: %\bibitem[Hankins et al.(2003)]{hkw+03} Hankins, T. H., Kern, J. S., Weatherall, J. C., \& Eilek, J. A. 2003, \nat, 422, 141

603: \bibitem[Hankins \& Rickett(1975)]{hr75} Hankins, T.~H.~\& Rickett, B.~J.\ 1975, Methods in Computational Physics.~Volume 14 - Radio astronomy, 14, 55

604: %\bibitem[Hibschman \& Arons(2001)]{ha01} Hibschman, J. A., \& Arons, J. 2001, \apj, 560, 871

605: \bibitem[Jenet \& Anderson(1998)]{ja98} Jenet, F.~A.~\& Anderson, S.~B.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 1467

606: \bibitem[Jenet et al.(1998)]{jenal98} Jenet, F., Anderson, S., Kaspi, V., Prince, T., \& Unwin, S. 1998, ApJ, 498, 365

607: \bibitem[Jenet et al.(2001)]{jenal01} Jenet, F., Anderson, S. B.,\& Prince, T.A. 2001, ApJ, 546, 394 

608: \bibitem[Jenet \& Gil(2003)]{jg03} Jenet, F.~A.~\& Gil, J.\ 2003, \apjl, 596, L215 

609: \bibitem[Kijak \& Gil(2003)]{kg03} Kijak, J., \& Gil, J. 2003, A\&A, 397, 969

610: \bibitem[Kinkhabwala \& Thorsett (2000)]{kt00} Kinkhabwala, A. \& Thorsett, S. E. 2000, \apj, 535, 365

611: %\bibitem[Kramer et al.(2002)]{kjs02} Kramer, M., Johnston, S., \& van Straten, W. 2002, \mnras, 334, 523

612: %\bibitem[Lou(2001)]{lou01} Lou, Y. 2001, \apjl, 563, 147

613: \bibitem[Melikidze, Gil \& Pataraya(2000)]{mgp00} Melikidze, G.I., Gil, J. \& Pataraya, A.D., 2000, ApJ, 544, 1081

614: %\bibitem[Press, Teukolsky, Vetterling, \& Flannery(1992)]{pressetal} Press, W.~H., Teukolsky, S.~A., Vetterling, W.~T., \& Flannery, B.~P.\ 1992, \\Numerical Recipes in C (2nd ed.; Cambridge: University Press)

615: \bibitem[Rankin(1983)]{r83} Rankin J. M., 1983, ApJ, 274, 333

616: %\bibitem[Rankin(1986)]{r86} Rankin J. M., 1986, ApJ, 301, 901

617: \bibitem[Rankin \& Ramachandran(2003)]{rr03} Rankin, J.~M.~\& Ramachandran, R.\ 2003, \apj, 590, 411

618: \bibitem[Ruderman \& Sutherland(1975)]{rs75} Ruderman, M. A., \& Sutherland, P. G. 1975, \apj, 196,51 (RS75)

619: \bibitem[Stineberg(1982)]{sti82} Stineberg, D.~R.\ 1982, Ph.D.~Thesis,

620: %\bibitem[Taylor et al.(1993)]{tml93} Taylor, J. H., Manchester, R. N., \& Lyne, A. G. 1993, \apjs, 88, 529 

621: \bibitem[van Leeuwen, Stappers, Ramachandran, \&Rankin(2003)]{vsr+03} van Leeuwen, A.~G.~J., Stappers, B.~W., Ramachandran, R., \& Rankin, J.~M.\ 2003, \aap, 399, 223

622: %\bibitem[Weisberg et al.(1986)]{wetal86} Weisberg, J. M., Armstrong, B. K., Backus, P. R., et al. 1986, AJ, 92, 621 (W86)

623: %\bibitem[Zhang, Harding \& Muslimov(2000)]{xhm00} Zhang, B.,

624: %Harding, A. K., \& Muslimov, A. G. 2000, ApJ, 531, L135 (ZHM00)

625: 

626: \end{thebibliography}{}

627: \end{document}

628: