1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4:
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8:
9: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10:
11: \newcommand{\degree}{$^{\circ}$}
12: \newcommand{\Mo}{$\dot {\rm{M}}$}
13: %\newcommand{\Lo}{$\dot {\rm{L}}$}
14: \newcommand{\HII}{H\,{\sc ii}}
15: %\newcommand\arcmin{\mbox{$^\prime$}}%
16: %\newcommand\arcsec{\mbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}%
17: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
18:
19: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
20:
21: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJ}
22:
23: \shorttitle{YSO near IRAS 07029-1215}
24: \shortauthors{Forbrich et al.}
25:
26:
27: %\received{2003 June 30}
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{An Extremely Young Massive Stellar Object \\ near IRAS 07029-1215}
31:
32:
33: \author{J. Forbrich\altaffilmark{1}, K. Schreyer, B. Posselt\altaffilmark{2}, R. Klein\altaffilmark{2}}
34: \affil{Astrophysikalisches Institut und Universit\"ats-Sternwarte, Friedrich-Schiller-Universit\"at, Schillerg\"a\ss
35: chen 2-3, D-07745 Jena, Germany}
36:
37: \and
38:
39: \author{Th. Henning}
40: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany; forbrich@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}
43: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstra{\ss}e, D-85748 Garching, Germany}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: In the course of a comprehensive mm/submm survey of massive star-forming
47: regions, the vicinities of a sample of 47 luminous IRAS sources were closely investigated with SCUBA and IRAM
48: bolometers in order to
49: search for massive protostellar candidates. A particularly interesting object has been found in the
50: surroundings of the bright FIR source IRAS 07029-1215. Follow-up line observations show that the object is cold, that it has a massive envelope, and that it is associated
51: with an energetic molecular outflow. No infrared point source has been detected at its position. Therefore, it is a very good candidate for a member of the long searched-for group
52: of massive protostars.
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \keywords{stars: formation, ISM: jets and outflows, submillimeter}
56: \objectname[IRAS 07029-1215]{}
57:
58: %% \citet ohne Klammern, \citep mit Klammern drumherum:
59: %% Henning (1892) bzw. (Henning 1892)
60: %% Bsp. \citep{hen61,lyn68,spi85} \citet{aur82}
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63: The study of the earliest stages of massive star formation (MSF) is one of the most exciting subjects of present research in this field.
64: Whether the dominant
65: formation process for massive stars is disk accretion (see e.g. \citealp{jia96}) or coalescence \citep{bon98} is still an
66: open question. The presence of outflows in regions of massive star formation favours, however, the first scenario. Similarly to previous
67: surveys (e.g. \citealp{beu02b}, \citealp{mue02} or \citealp{hun00}), we have searched for MSF candidates located near bright IRAS sources using SCUBA and IRAM bolometers (\citealp{pos03} and Klein et al. 2003, {\sl in prep.}). Our focus was on objects unrelated to the IRAS sources themselves, looking for the earliest evolutionary stages not yet seen in the near- to mid-infrared wavelength regime. Even if we do not yet know what the observational features of massive protostars are \citep{eva02}, their invisibility at NIR/MIR wavelengths is a defining criterion.
68: Near IRAS~07029-1215, an object with an IRAS luminosity of $L(IRAS)=1700$~L$_{\odot}$ \citep{hen92} at its distance of $d=1$~kpc, we discovered a deeply embedded object
69: (UYSO~1, for \textsl{Unidentified Young Stellar Object~1}), powering a high-velocity bipolar CO outflow.
70: The IRAS source is located in the bright \HII{} region S~297, illuminated by the B1II/III star
71: HD~53623 \citep{hou88}. UYSO~1 is located very close to the edge of a dark cloud.
72:
73: \section{Observations}
74: CO($J=3 \to 2$) line mapping of UYSO~1 was carried out with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT)
75: \footnote{JCMT is operated by the Joint Astronomy Center on behalf of the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research
76: Council of the United
77: Kingdom, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, and the National Research Council of Canada.}
78: on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, in October 1999. The facility receiver B3 (315-373 GHz) was used as frontend, the Digital
79: Autocorrelation Spectrometer
80: (DAS) as backend. With a total bandwidth of 250 MHz, centered on v$_{lsr} = +12$~\kms{}, the maps were obtained in
81: position-switch mode
82: with an
83: off-position 10\arcmin{} to the east. Map sampling was at intervals of 10\arcsec{}, the total on+off integration time was 10 min, the beam efficiency $\eta = 0.63$, and the beam size was 14\arcsec{}. Additionally, SCUBA continuum observations at $\lambda = 450$~$\mu$m and $\lambda = 850$~$\mu$m were performed with a total integration time of 46 minutes. Here, beam sizes were 8\arcsec{} and 14\arcsec{}, respectively. Based on six different field scans with different chop throws, noise was minimised using the Emerson~II technique \citep{eme95}. In March 2003, additional CS($J=2 \to 1$), CS($J=5 \to 4$), SiO($J=2 \to 1$) and especially H$_2$CO($J=3_{03}-2_{02}$)/($J=3_{22}-2_{21}$) observations were obtained at the IRAM 30m telescope using the B100, B230, A100 and
84: A230 receivers. The raster map sampling was the same as for the JCMT observations, though a smaller range of offset
85: positions was observed. The center position is shifted southward by 6.4\arcsec{} when compared to the JCMT map. Data was obtained in position switch mode, integration time at each offset was 6~min. All line observations together with the observing parameters are summarized in Tab.~\ref{t0}.
86:
87: We used the CLASS software developed by the Grenoble Astrophysics Group for the line data reduction, including zero-order baseline subtraction, and GAIA for the SCUBA data.
88:
89: \section{Results}
90: The POSS\footnote{The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute under U.S.
91: Government grant NAGW-2166. The images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on
92: Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the present compressed digital form with the permission of
93: these institutions.}
94: view in Fig.~\ref{fig1} shows the environment of IRAS~07029-1215. The overlaid SCUBA map at 850 $\mu$m displays UYSO 1 as a compact emission peak at $\alpha_{\rm (B1950.0)}=07^{\rm h}02^{\rm m}51^{\rm s} , \delta_{\rm (B1950.0)}=-12$\degree$14'26"$, between S~297
95: and the dark cloud. In addition to this, two dusty filaments are visible at 850~$\mu$m. The eastern filament contains the IRAS point source
96: position, the western one is located inside the dark cloud.
97:
98: UYSO 1 is still invisible at near- and
99: mid-infrared wavelengths: No infrared point source in the $\lambda = $2.2..20~$\mu$m range is visible in 2MASS and MSX images (see Fig.~\ref{fig2}a,b),
100: but some faint "reflected" light can be seen in the 2MASS $K_S$-band image. It cannot be ruled out, however, that this is captured
101: H$_2$ line emission, e.g. tracing cloud surfaces and outflows. Neither the IRAS, nor the 2MASS,
102: nor the MSX infrared survey point source catalogues resulted in detections at the UYSO 1 position. There is, however, an MSX point source inside the "reflected" light south of UYSO~1.
103:
104: The CO map in Fig.~\ref{fig2}c is a close-up view of the dense dust core. The line wings, extending from $-20$~km~s$^{-1}$ at [0",-20"] to $+40$~km~s$^{-1}$ at [0",0"] (see Fig.~\ref{fig3A}), can be clearly distinguished from well-determined baselines, extending from $-40$~km~s$^{-1}$ to $+50$~km~s$^{-1}$, respectively. Lines are narrower in off-outflow positions. Fig.~\ref{fig3B} shows a comparison of the CO($J=3 \to 2$) line profile with the CS($J=5 \to 4$) profile in the map center. CS($J=5 \to 4$) is a high-density tracer with a critical density of n$_{\rm crit}=7\times 10^6$~cm$^{-3}$.
105:
106: Contrary to what could be expected from the 850~$\mu$m map, the CO data do not show a
107: spherically symmetric structure. Instead, the envelope seems to be compressed towards the \HII{} region east of it. The CO peak
108: is roughly 10\arcsec{} off the SCUBA peak position. The line wing map displays a bipolar outflow in the NW-SE direction, its origin being UYSO~1 at raster coordinates [0\arcsec{},-10\arcsec{}], taking the emission peak of the complete integrated line as definition. The outflow is not clearly visible in the CS data, possibly due to the average density being below the CS critical densities. Lines on corresponding positions have, however, corresponding shapes.
109: SiO($J=2 \to 1$) could only be detected at the position
110: [-10\arcsec{}, 16.4\arcsec{}], in the outer regions of the redshifted outflow lobe. Possibly,
111: this is due to a bow shock caused by the outflow colliding with the local
112: interstellar medium. The detection at this position is a 6~$\sigma$ detection. With the spatial resolution of the present observations, we cannot decide whether the bipolar outflow is composed of only one or more components (cf. \citealp{beu02}).
113:
114: The SCUBA 450~$\mu$m map (see Fig.~\ref{fig2}d) only shows a point source 6\arcsec{} to the north of UYSO~1, but in between the two outflow lobes.
115:
116: \section{Analysis}
117: From the CO($J=3 \to 2$) observations, the object mass and outflow parameters can be deduced. The mass derived from an
118: integration of
119: column
120: densities can be compared to the virial mass. Line wing analysis delivers physical parameters of the bipolar outflow,
121: however still
122: dependent on the unknown outflow inclination angle. The distance to UYSO~1, assumed to be about the same as the distance
123: to IRAS~07029-1215,
124: was kinematically determined to be 1~kpc by \citet{wbr89}. However, while the distance to the illuminating star of S~297,
125: namely HD~53623, was spectroscopically determined to be 2.2~kpc $\pm$ 25\% by \citet{nec80}, Hipparcos measured a parallax for
126: HD~53623 of $\pi = 2.21 \pm 1.01$ mas, corresponding to a distance of $450^{+380}_{-140}$~pc \citep{esa97}. Assuming the true distance is near the
127: upper limit of this interval, we adopt a value of 1~kpc for the following mass estimates, in accordance with detailed studies of CMa~R1
128: by \citet{she99} and \citet{dez99}.
129:
130: The CO data analysis is depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig2}c, in
131: direct comparison
132: to 2MASS-$K_S$\footnote{Atlas Image obtained as part of the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), a joint project of the
133: University of
134: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the
135: National Aeronautics and
136: Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.} data and the 450~$\mu$m continuum.
137:
138: \subsection{Temperature Determination}
139:
140: While the main beam temperatures $T_{\rm mb}$ of the highly optically thick CO lines already confine the kinetic temperature to the 40-50~K range, another estimate was obtained from H$_2$CO($J=3_{03} \to 2_{02}$)/($J=3_{22} \to 2_{21}$) data, following \citet{man93}.
141: Fig.~\ref{fig5} shows the two H$_2$CO transitions for UYSO~1. The intensity ratio deduced from fitted Gaussians is 6, thus indicating a kinetic temperature of T=40$\pm 5$~K for a relatively wide range of densities.
142:
143: \subsection{Mass Determination}
144: \label{massdet}
145:
146: Assuming virial conditions, i.e. assuming that the observed line width is entirely due to motion in gravitational equilibrium,
147: the total mass of
148: the object can be estimated as described by \citet{hen00}. Inside a sphere of 0.14~pc radius, corresponding to the 40\%
149: contour level (deconvolved with the 14\arcsec{} beam) at
150: 10~$\sigma$, and using the Gaussian fit result of $\Delta v=3$~km~s$^{-1}$, a virial mass of $M_{\rm vir} = 180$~M$_{\odot}$ is
151: obtained.
152:
153: Following \citet{hen00}, we derive hydrogen column densities from the CO($J=3\to 2$) transition,
154: assuming a relation of $N(\rm H_2)$~(cm$^{-2}) = 3 \times 10^{20} \int T_{\rm mb} \rm dv$.
155: An underlying assumption is a conversion factor of CO($J=3\to 2$) / CO($J=1\to 0$) close to unity, as it is frequently observed in massive star-forming regions and explained by clumpy structure \citep{sto00}.
156: The gas mass of the cloud can then be determined as $M_{\rm gas} = 2$m$_{\rm H}\bar \mu A \langle N($H$_2)\rangle$, where $\bar \mu=1.36$ takes into account the interstellar mean
157: molecular weight per H atom. $A$ is the area occupied by the source.
158:
159: Within the same area and to the same confidence level as the virial analysis, this leads to a different result for the cloud mass.
160: With an average
161: column density of $N$(H$_2$) = $3.2 \times 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}\!\!,$ the resulting mass is $M_{\rm gas} = 40$~M$_{\odot}$.
162: %% Illustrating the effect of the essentially unknown distance, assuming d=1020 pc yields a mass of 44 M$_{\odot}$, while
163: %% d=2215 pc results in 210 M$_{\odot}$.
164:
165: Another estimate for the total mass has been calculated from the continuum observations at $\lambda = 850$~$\mu$m. Assuming a dust temperature of $T_{\rm d}=20$~K and optically thin conditions, $M_{\rm gas}=F_\nu \cdot d^2 / (\kappa_m(\nu) \cdot B_\nu(T_{\rm d})) \cdot [M_{\rm gas}/M_{\rm dust}]$. Using an interpolated opacity of $\kappa = 1.97$~cm$^{-2}$/g (thin ice mantles, \citealp{osh94}), the result is $M=15$~M$_{\odot}$.
166: The radius of the region taken into account for this calculation is 0.11~pc (at a distance of 1~kpc), slightly smaller than the 0.14~pc used here. Additionally, the dust continuum emission traces only the high-density central regions while the CO emission is collected along the line of sight throughout the low-density halo. Optically thick emission might further influence the estimate (see \S \ref{SEDtext}). These two points at least partly explain the discrepancy.
167:
168: Thus, the mass estimates based on line and dust emission are compatible when keeping in mind their respective limitations and range between 15 and 40~M$_{\odot}$. The virial mass is much higher which is certainly caused by an overestimation of line width due to optical thickness and turbulent motion, in addition to the cloud not being in virial equilibrium.
169:
170: \subsection{Outflow Properties}
171:
172: The two line wings were analyzed to their respective 10\% contour levels, corresponding to a 2~$\sigma$ detection for the
173: redshifted
174: line wing and a 4~$\sigma$ detection for the blueshifted line wing. The masses inside the two outflow lobes are
175: again calculated by
176: integration of H$_2$ column densities, resulting in $M_{\rm blue} = 1.8$~M$_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm red} = 3.6$~M$_{\odot}$, the
177: total outflow mass
178: thus
179: being $M_{\rm out} = 5.4$~M$_{\odot}$.
180:
181: The maximum projected velocities of the red and blue line wings are $v_{\rm proj,r}=27.9$~km~s$^{-1}$ and $v_{\rm proj,b}=32.1$~km~s$^{-1}$ respectively,
182: the mean value being
183: $v_{\rm proj}=30$~km~s$^{-1}$. Together with the known distance and the outflow radial sizes, the dynamical timescale and the
184: mass loss rate can be
185: obtained. With caution, the latter can be empirically converted to luminosity, and spectral type as well as mass of an assumed
186: central star. All values
187: discussed hereafter are summarized in Tab.~\ref{t1} for inclinations of $i=10^{\circ}\!\!,$ $i=57.3^{\circ}$ (the most
188: probable value, cf.
189: \citealp{bon96}) and $i=80^{\circ}\!\!.$
190:
191: When the apparent outflow velocity $v_{\rm proj}$ and the apparent maximum outflow extension have been
192: inclination-corrected to $v_{\rm
193: out}$ and
194: $R_{\rm out}$, the dynamical timescale can be calculated from $t_{\rm d}(i) = R_{\rm out}(i)/v_{\rm out}(i)$. The
195: resulting values range from $t_{\rm d}(80^{\circ}) \approx 500$~years to $t_{\rm d}(10^{\circ}) \approx 1.5 \times 10^4$~years. However, the timescale estimated this way is not a good age indicator.
196: Only a massive object can uphold mass outflow
197: rates $\dot M(i) = M_{\rm out}(i)/t_{\rm d}(i)$ ranging from $\dot M(10^{\circ}) \approx 4 \times 10^{-4}$~M$_{\odot}$/yr to $\dot M(80^{\circ}) \approx 1 \times 10^{-2}$~M$_{\odot}$/yr.
198: They can be empirically transformed into the luminosity of the central object
199: according to \citet{shc96}, \citet{hen00} or, based on a more
200: comprehensive sample, by \citet{beu02}. Tab.~\ref{t2} summarizes the resulting
201: spectral types, masses and luminosities (using data by \citealp{lan91}).
202: However, these properties of the central object can be better determined using the SED (see \S \ref{SEDtext}).
203:
204: It may be interesting to consider the age of the neighbouring \HII{} region. Following \citet{cer98}, this
205: age can be estimated \citep{whi94}.
206: The size of S~297 in the optical regime with a diameter of 7' (Sharpless catalogue) corresponds to a radius
207: of only about $2.1 \times 10^5$~AU, hence indicating that the nebula is rather young. Assuming a typical mean density
208: of $10^3$~cm$^{-3}$ and a Lyman continuum flux for a B1 star from \citet{tho84}, the resulting age is approximately
209: $7 \times 10^5$~yrs.
210:
211: Regardless of the uncertainties in these age estimates, the \HII{} region is likely to be older than UYSO~1. Possibly, this is an example of induced star formation, although this would need kinematic confirmation.
212:
213: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distribution}
214: \label{SEDtext}
215: While the two measured continuum fluxes at 450~$\mu$m and 850~$\mu$m determine the cold dust emission, more
216: data had to be
217: complemented before the spectral energy distribution could be tentatively compared to modeling results. Given the aim of
218: determining the luminosity
219: and mass of the central object as well as having a comparison to the mass determination, upper flux limits for short
220: wavelengths helped
221: pinning down physical properties of the central object. As main support besides the JCMT data, IRAS fluxes were used, determined at the position of UYSO~1 within beam sizes
222: from the IRAS
223: atlas maps. UYSO~1 is unresolved also on IRAS HIRES maps. Additionally, data for the definitely brighter nearby MSX point source G225.4582-02.5939 and 2MASS detection limits set further
224: constraints.
225:
226: Integrating the SED and using the flux limits at infrared wavelengths as the actual flux values leads to a luminosity of $<1900$~L$_{\odot}$, assuming spherical symmetry.
227: A modified blackbody accounting for the dust optical depth was fitted to the data: $S_\nu = B_\nu(T) (1-\exp(-\tau_\nu)) \Delta\Omega$, with the beam size $\Delta\Omega$ and with dust opacities $\kappa_\nu \propto \nu^\beta$ (see e.g. \citealp{hil83}). A good fit is obtained for $T=45$~K and $\beta=2$, however fits with temperatures between 40 and 50~K are also fitting the data within the uncertainties.
228: With the aim of checking the consistency of existing data, the continuum
229: emission was then modeled using the radiative transfer code developed by
230: \citet{man98}. This is an accelerated version of the 2-D ray-tracing code
231: developed for radiative transfer in disk configurations by \citet{men97}. Due
232: to insufficient parameter constraints, the code was used in its 1D version only.
233:
234: The limiting outer radius of the model could be estimated from the CO data to
235: be $3.2 \times 10^4$~AU, taking the same area as for the mass estimation. Assuming an exponential of the density
236: distribution of 2.0 with a dust-to-gas ratio of 1:150, the model
237: uses silicate optical data from \citet{dor95}, while the properties of the
238: carbonaceous dust are from \citet{jae98} [1000~K data]. The ratio of silicates to carbon is
239: 3:2. The inner model radius is determined by the dust sublimation temperature
240: of 1500~K.
241:
242: Fig.~\ref{fig4} shows the results for an envelope mass of
243: $M_{\rm env} = 30$~M$_{\odot}$ and an assumed single
244: central object in the B2.5 class. The optical depth at $\lambda = 500$~nm for the simulation runs is $\tau_{500 \rm nm} \approx 6400$. Since the code becomes inaccurate for high optical depths, the computed SED is arbitrarily shown for $\tau \lesssim 1000$, corresponding to $\lambda > 10$~$\mu$m. At $\lambda = 850$~$\mu$m, the optical depth is $\tau_{850 \rm \mu m} \approx 1$. Thus, the mass estimate from the dust emission in \S \ref{massdet} is rather a lower limit because of contribution from optically thick emission.
245:
246: Both the simulation and the blackbody fit indicate the equivalent of an early B star as the central object. This finding is compatible with the result of the empirical outflow analysis for $i=57.3^{\circ}$.
247: The envelope mass in the simulation is compatible with the mass estimate from the CO($J=3 \to 2$) data (40~M$_{\odot}$),
248: especially when keeping in mind that the
249: modeled gas density only reaches $10^4$~cm$^{-3}$ at its outer radius, thus
250: allowing for a slightly higher envelope mass when integrating further outwards.
251:
252: \section{Conclusions}
253:
254: The emerging picture of UYSO~1 drawn from both mass estimates and subsequent empirical relations
255: as well as SED considerations thus is that of an early B star surrounded by an
256: envelope of about 30-40~M$_{\odot}$. The object seems to be in a particularly early evolutionary state, but already drives a bipolar outflow with a total mass of M$_{\rm outflow} = 5.4$~M$_{\odot}$. To our knowledge, there are only very few comparable sources that are undetected at infrared wavelengths (see e.g. \citealp{hun98}, \citealp{bdm99} and \citealp{fon03}).
257: With additional high-resolution observations, we hope to be able to specify these conclusions and learn more about this evolutionary state. Possibly, parameters of a putative disk around UYSO~1 could be derived then.
258:
259:
260: \acknowledgments
261:
262: The authors are grateful to Remo Tilanus for his support during the JCMT observing run, as well as to R. Mauersberger for carrying out the DDT observations at the IRAM 30m telescope in service mode.
263:
264: This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
265:
266:
267: \begin{thebibliography}{}
268: \bibitem[Bernard, Dobashi, \& Momose(1999)]{bdm99} Bernard, J. P., \& Dobashi, K., Momose, M. 1999, A\&A, 350, 197
269: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002)]{beu02b} Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K. M., Motte, F., Sridharan, T. K., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002, ApJ, 566, 945
270: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2002b)]{beu02} Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T.K., Menten, K.M., Walmsley, C.M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002, A\&A, 383, 892
271: \bibitem[Bonnell, Bate, \& Zinnecker(1998)]{bon98} Bonnell, I.A., Bate, M.R., \& Zinnecker, H. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 93
272: \bibitem[Bontemps, Ward-Thompson, \& Andr\'e(1996)]{bon96} Bontemps, S., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Andr\'e, P. 1996, A\&A, 314, 477
273: \bibitem[Cernicharo et al.(1998)]{cer98} Cernicharo, J., Lefloch, B., Cox, P., Cesarsky, D., Esteban, C., Yusef-Zadeh, F., M\'endez, D.I., Acosta-Pulido, J., Garcia L\'opez, R.J., \& Heras, A. 1998, Science, 282, 462
274: \bibitem[de Zeeuw, Hoogerwerf, \& de Bruijne(1999)]{dez99} de Zeeuw, P.T., Hoogerwerf, R., \& de Bruijne, J.H.J. 1999, AJ 117, 354
275: \bibitem[Dorschner et al.(1995)]{dor95} Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, Th., J\"ager, C., \& Mutschke, H. 1995, A\&A, 300, 503
276: \bibitem[Emerson (1995)]{eme95} Emerson, D. T. 1995, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 75, Multi-feed Systems for Radio Telescopes, ed. D. T. Emerson, J. M. Payne, (San Francisco: ASP)
277: \bibitem[ESA(1997)]{esa97} ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Star Catalogues, ESA SP-1200
278: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2002)]{eva02} Evans II, N.J., Shirley, Y.L., Mueller, K.E., \& Knez, C. 2002, in ASP Conf.Ser.267, Hot Star Workshop III: The Earliest Phases of Massive Star Birth, ed. P.A. Crowther (San Francisco: ASP)
279: \bibitem[Fontani et al.(2003)]{fon03} Fontani, F., Cesaroni, R., Testi, L., Walmsley, C.M., Molinari, E., Neri, R., Shepherd, D., Brand, J., Palla, F., \& Zhang, Q., A\&A, \textsl{in press}
280: \bibitem[Henning et al.(1992)]{hen92} Henning, Th., Cesaroni, R., Walmsley, M., \& Pfau, W. 1992, \aaps, 93, 525
281: \bibitem[Henning et al.(2000)]{hen00} Henning, Th., Schreyer, K., Launhardt, R., \& Burkert, A. 2000, A\&A, 353, 211
282: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{hil83} Hildebrand, R.H. 1983, \qjras, 24, 267
283: \bibitem[Houk \& Smith-Moore(1988)]{hou88} Houk, N., \& Smith-Moore, M. 1988, Michigan catalogue of Two-Dimensional spectral types for the HD stars,vol. 4 : -26 to -12 degrees, Michigan Spectral Survey (Ann Arbor, Dept. of Astronomy, Univ. Michigan)
284: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(1998)]{hun98} Hunter, T.R., Neugebauer, G., Benford, D.J., Matthews, K., Lis, D.C., Serabyn, E., \& Phillips, T.G. 1998, ApJ, 493, L97
285: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(2000)]{hun00} Hunter, T. R., Churchwell, E., Watson, C., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., \& Roelfsema, P. R. 2000, AJ, 119, 2711
286: \bibitem[J\"ager et al.(1998)]{jae98} J\"ager, C., Mutschke, H., Dorschner, J., \& Henning, Th. 1998, A\&A, 332, 291
287: \bibitem[Jijina \& Adams(1996)]{jia96} Jijina, J., \& Adams, F.C. 1996, ApJ, 462, 874
288: \bibitem[Lang(1991)]{lan91} Lang, K.R. 1991, Astrophysical Data: Planets and Stars (Berlin: Springer)
289: \bibitem[Mangum \& Wootten(1993)]{man93} Mangum, J.G., \& Wootten, A. 1993, ApJS, 89, 123
290: \bibitem[Manske, Henning, \& Men'shchikov(1998)]{man98} Manske, V., Henning, Th., \& Men'shchikov, A.B. 1998, A\&A, 331, 52
291: \bibitem[Men'shchikov \& Henning(1997)]{men97} Men'shchikov, A. B., \& Henning, Th. 1997, A\&A, 318, 879
292: \bibitem[Mueller et al.(2002)]{mue02} Mueller, K.E., Shirley, Y.L., Evans, N.J., II, \& Jacobson, H.R. 2002, ApJS, 143, 469
293: \bibitem[Neckel, Klare, \& Sarcander(1980)]{nec80} Neckel, Th., Klare, G., \& Sarcander, M. 1980, A\&ASS, 42, 251
294: \bibitem[Ossenkopf \& Henning(1994)]{osh94} Ossenkopf, V., \& Henning, Th., A\&A, 291, 3
295: \bibitem[Posselt(2003)]{pos03} Posselt, B. 2003, diploma thesis, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
296: \bibitem[Rohlfs \& Wilson(2000)]{rwi00} Rohlfs, K., \& Wilson, T.L., 2000, Tools of Radio Astronomy (Berlin: Springer)
297: \bibitem[Shepherd \& Churchwell(1996)] {shc96} Shepherd, D.S., \& Churchwell, E. 1996, ApJ, 472, 225
298: \bibitem[Shevchenko et al.(1999)]{she99} Shevchenko, V.S., Ezhkova, O.V., Ibrahimov, M.A., van den Ancker, M.E., \& Tjin A Djie, H.R.E. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 210
299: \bibitem[St\"orzer et al.(2000)]{sto00} St\"orzer, H., Zielinsky, M., Stutzki, J., \& Sternberg, A. 2000, A\&A, 358, 682
300: \bibitem[Thompson(1984)]{tho84} Thompson, R.I. 1984, ApJ, 283, 165
301: \bibitem[Whitworth et al.(1994)]{whi94} Whitworth, A.P., Bhattal, A.S., Chapman, S.J., Disney, M.J., \& Turner, J.A. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 291
302: \bibitem[Wouterloot \& Brand(1989)]{wbr89} Wouterloot, J.G.A., \& Brand, J. 1989, A\&AS, 80, 149
303:
304: \end{thebibliography}
305:
306: \clearpage
307:
308: \begin{table}
309: \begin{center}
310: \caption{Heterodyne observations of UYSO~1\label{t0}}
311: \begin{tabular}{lrrrcc}
312: \tableline\tableline
313: Line& Frequency& Telescope& Date& beam size& $\eta_{\rm mb}$\\
314: \tableline
315: CO($J=3 \to 2$)& 345.79 GHz& JCMT& Oct 99& 14"& 0.63\\
316: CS($J=2 \to 1$)& 97.98 GHz& IRAM 30m& Mar 03& 25"& 0.78\\
317: CS($J=5 \to 4$)& 244.94 GHz& IRAM 30m& Mar 03& 10"& 0.50\\
318: SiO($J=2 \to 1$)& 86.84 GHz& IRAM 30m& Mar 03& 29"& 0.78\\
319: H$_2$CO($J=3-2$)\tablenotemark{a}&218.34 GHz& IRAM 30m& Mar 03& 12"& 0.56\\
320: \tableline
321: \end{tabular}
322: \tablenotetext{a}{H$_2$CO($J=3_{03} \to 2_{02}$) and ($J=3_{22} \to 2_{21}$)}
323: \end{center}
324: \end{table}
325:
326: \begin{table}
327: \begin{center}
328: \caption{UYSO~1 outflow properties\label{t1}}
329: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
330: \tableline\tableline
331: i& v$_{\rm out}$ & R$_{\rm out}$ & t$_{\rm d}$ & $\dot {\rm{M}}$\\
332: \tableline
333: $10^{\circ}$ & 30.5 km s$^{-1}$ & $1.4 \times 10^{13}$ km & 14600 yrs & $ 3.7 \times 10^{-4} $ M$_{\odot}$/yr\\
334: $57^{\circ}\!\!.3$ & 55.5 km s$^{-1}$ & $2.9 \times 10^{12}$ km & 1700 yrs & $3.3 \times 10^{-3} $ M$_{\odot}$/yr\\
335: $80^{\circ}$ & 172.7 km s$^{-1}$ & $2.4 \times 10^{12}$ km & 450 yrs & $1.2 \times 10^{-2} $ M$_{\odot}$/yr\\
336: \tableline
337: \end{tabular}
338: \end{center}
339: \end{table}
340:
341: %%\clearpage %% Save the forests !
342:
343: \begin{table}
344: \begin{center}
345: \caption{Outflow-inferred properties of assumed central star\label{t2}}
346: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
347: \tableline\tableline
348: i & L & spec. type & M$_{\rm star}$\\
349: \tableline
350: $10^{\circ}$ & $10^3 $ L$_{\odot}$ & B4 & 6.5 M$_{\odot}$\\
351: $57^{\circ}\!\!.3$ & $10^4 $ L$_{\odot}$ & B1 & 13 M$_{\odot}$\\
352: $80^{\circ}$ & $10^5 $ L$_{\odot}$ & O9 & 19 M$_{\odot}$\\
353: \tableline
354: \end{tabular}
355: \end{center}
356: \end{table}
357:
358: \clearpage
359:
360: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
361: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
362:
363:
364: \begin{figure}
365: \rotatebox{-90}{
366: \plotone{f1.eps}}
367: \caption{The surroundings of UYSO~1: POSS-I, overlaid with 850~$\mu$m continuum from the JCMT. The box indicates the FOV of Fig. 2. \label{fig1}}
368: \end{figure}
369:
370: %\clearpage
371:
372: \begin{figure}
373: \rotatebox{-90}{
374: \plotone{f2.eps}}
375: \caption{Close-up views of UYSO~1 in a) MSX-$A$, b) 2MASS-$K_S$, c) CO($J=3 \to 2$) and d) 450 $\mu$m continuum (both JCMT). The box in the MSX data shows the FOV of the other pictures. The integrated CO line data is shown
376: in 10\% contours, the two line wings are shown down to 50\% intensity. Spectra positions are indicated as well as the beam sizes for CO and the 450~$\mu$m continuum.
377: UYSO~1 is located just below the center position at [0\arcsec{},-10\arcsec{}], the position of the CO peak.
378: \label{fig2}}
379: \end{figure}
380:
381: %\clearpage
382:
383: \begin{figure}
384: \rotatebox{-90}{
385: \epsscale{0.80}
386: \plotone{f3.eps}}
387: \caption{CO($J=3 \to 2$) spectra on the inner grid. The line maxima (all between 40~K and 50~K) were cut to allow for a better depiction of line wings.\label{fig3A}}
388: \end{figure}
389:
390: \begin{figure}
391: \rotatebox{-90}{
392: \epsscale{0.55}
393: \plotone{f4.eps}}
394: \caption{Comparison of the CO($J=3 \to 2$) and CS($J=5 \to 4$) lines at the respective peak positions: the CO line at [0\arcsec{},0\arcsec{}] and an addition of four CS spectra, amplified ten times for depiction, at [0\arcsec{},-6.4\arcsec{}]. Positions are in arcseconds relative to the center position of the CO grid. \label{fig3B}}
395: \end{figure}
396:
397: %\clearpage
398:
399: \begin{figure}
400: \rotatebox{-90}{
401: \epsscale{0.5}
402: \plotone{f6.eps}}
403: \caption{Temperature determination with H$_2$CO lines (see text). Gaussian fit results are shown in grey.\label{fig5}}
404: \end{figure}
405:
406: %\clearpage
407:
408: \begin{figure}
409: \rotatebox{-90}{
410: \epsscale{0.7}
411: \plotone{f5.eps}}
412: \caption{Modeling results from the Manske code. The straight line shows the total flux (displayed
413: for $\tau_\lambda \lesssim 1000$), boxes
414: indicate beam-convolved fluxes. The dashed line corresponds to a modified
415: blackbody at T=45~K (with $\beta=2$)\label{fig4}}
416: \end{figure}
417: \end{document}
418:
419:
420:
421:
422:
423: