1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Dust Coagulation in a Non-Uniform Nebula}
4: \shortauthors{Haghighipour}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Rapid Growth of Dust Particles in the Vicinity of
9: Local Gas Density Enhancements in a Solar Nebula}
10:
11:
12: \author{Nader Haghighipour}
13: \affil{Department of Terrestrial Magnetism and NASA Astrobiology Institute, \\
14: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road, \\
15: Washington, DC 20015}
16:
17: \email{nader@dtm.ciw.edu}
18:
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21:
22: The results of a numerical study of the growth
23: of solid particles, ranging from 1 micron to 1 millimeter
24: in size, in the vicinity of an azimuthally
25: symmetric density enhancement of a protostellar disk
26: are presented. It is shown that the
27: combined effect of gas drag and pressure gradients,
28: which causes solid objects to rapidly migrate
29: toward the location of the local maximum density,
30: can also enhance the rate of growth of
31: dust particles to larger objects. The results of
32: numerical simulations of such growth processes are presented
33: and the effects of the changes of the physical properties
34: of particles on the rates of their growth
35: are also discussed.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38:
39: \keywords{solar system: formation, planetary systems: formation,
40: planetary systems: protoplanetary disks}
41:
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: The focus of this paper is on the study of
46: the growth rate of dust grains
47: in the vicinity of a local maximum density
48: of a nebula.
49: It has recently been shown that in a nebula
50: with local gas density enhancements,
51: the combined effect of gas drag and pressure gradients
52: causes solid objects to rapidly migrate toward the location
53: of maximum density (Haghighipour $\&$ Boss, 2003a$\&$b,
54: hereafter HB03a$\&$b). In those papers,
55: the authors have
56: studied the dynamics of a single object in a
57: non-uniform gaseous disk with
58: no particulate background material.
59: The only interaction considered in those papers
60: between the object and the disk was through the gas drag.
61: If the disk contains a mixture of gas and
62: small solid particles, however, the motion of an object
63: will also be affected by its interaction with this
64: particulate material. For instance,
65: an object may sweep up smaller particles and grow
66: larger during its gas-drag induced migration.
67: In this paper, I consider particulate material coupled
68: to a gaseous disk with a local density enhancement,
69: and study the rate of growth of
70: small particles while sweeping up the particles
71: of the background material.
72:
73: For the past four decades, the growth of dust particles
74: in a solar nebula was studied by many authors.
75: In 1969, Safronov studied the growth of dust particles
76: during their vertical descent in a quiescent nebula and
77: showed that, considering their sticking growth, settling of
78: dust particles could be quite rapid. Safronov's formulation
79: indicated that dust particles could grow to 1 centimeter in size
80: at a 1 AU radial distance from the Sun, assuming
81: a 100$\%$ sticking probability \citep{Safronov}.
82: Growth and sedimentation of dust particles have also been studied
83: extensively by \citet{Weid80,Weid84} and \citet[][1986]{Nakagawa81}.
84: \citet{Weid80,Weid84} considered coagulation of dust grains due to
85: van der Waals force in their settling toward the midplane
86: and showed that, while such particles grow to 1 centimeter in size,
87: they create a turbulent layer in the vicinity of the midplane which
88: increases the rates of their collision and their coalescence to
89: larger objects. \citet{Nakagawa81} studied the
90: growth and settling of dust grains at the location of Earth
91: in a nebula and showed that, similar to the results presented
92: by Safronov, the settling of particles and the formation
93: of a layer of centimeter-sized objects in the vicinity of the midplane can
94: occur in a relatively short time ($\simeq$300 years).
95: This study was later extended by \citet{Nakagawa86}
96: to the regions of Jupiter and Neptune in which the
97: authors studied the settling and growth of dust
98: particles in laminar phase of a nebula and presented
99: analytical expressions for the rates of the growth and
100: also vertical and radial motions of solids. By treating
101: a dust layer as a two-dimensional fluid, \citet{Nakagawa86}
102: showed that the total settling time of dust grains in
103: the two stages of gas- and dust-dominant phases are smaller
104: than those estimated by \citet{Weid80} and \citet{Nakagawa81}.
105: More recently, \citet{Sup00} have studied the coagulation of
106: small solids in a turbulent protostellar disk with an application
107: to the formation of icy planetesimals in the outer region
108: of the nebula.
109:
110: In this paper, I extend the previous studies presented
111: in HB03a$\&$b by considering the growth of a dust particle
112: due to interaction with the particulate background of a nebula
113: in the vicinity of its local density enhancement. The
114: main purpose of this paper is to study how the combined
115: effect of gas drag and pressure gradients can speed up
116: the coagulation of dust particles and the
117: formation of centimeter-sized objects.
118:
119: The model nebula considered in this paper is
120: presented in $\S$ 2. Section 3 presents the equations
121: of motion of a solid particle and $\S$ 4
122: deals with the analysis of the numerical results.
123: Section 5 concludes this study by reviewing
124: the results and discussing their applications.
125:
126:
127:
128: \section{The Model Nebula}
129:
130: The model nebula in this study is
131: an isothermal and turbulence-free protostellar disk
132: with a solar-type star at its center. The nebula is assumed
133: to be a mixture of pure molecular hydrogen at hydrostatic
134: equilibrium, and small
135: submicron-sized solid particles. It is also assumed that
136: the density of the gas maximizes at certain locations
137: in the nebula.
138:
139: In a cylindrical
140: coordinate system with its origin at the location of the
141: central star and its polar plane on the midplane of the
142: nebula, the gas distribution function at any point $(r,z)$
143: is given by (HB03b)
144: \vskip 1pt
145: \begin{equation}
146: {\rho_g}(r,z)\,= \,{\rho_g}(r,0) \>{\rm {exp}}
147: \Biggl\{{{8GM}\over {\pi {{\bar v}_{\rm {th}}^2}}}\,
148: \biggl[{1\over {{({r^2}+{z^2})^{1/2}}}}-{1\over r}\biggr]\Biggr\}.
149: \end{equation}
150: \vskip 8pt
151: \noindent
152: In equation (1), $M$ is the mass of the central star,
153: $G$ is the gravitational constant, and
154: ${\rho_g}(r,0)$ represents the gas distribution function
155: on the midplane of the nebula.
156: For simplicity, the density of the gas
157: is considered to have an azimuthally symmetric maximum
158: on the midplane and is given by (HB03a$\&$b)
159: \begin{equation}
160: {\rho_g}(r,0)\,=\,{\rho_0}\,
161: {\rm {exp}}\Biggl[-\beta\Bigl(
162: {r \over{r_m}}-1 {\Bigr)^2}\Biggr]\,,
163: \end{equation}
164: where ${\rho_0}\,,{r_m}$ and $\beta$ are constant quantities
165: (Figure 1).
166:
167: The quantity ${{\bar v}_{\rm {th}}^2}=8{K_B}T/\pi {m_H}$
168: in equation (1) is the mean thermal velocity of the gas molecules.
169: In this equation, $K_B$ is the Boltzmann constant,
170: $T$ is the temperature of the gas, and
171: $m_H$ is the molecular mass of hydrogen.
172: The gas density function
173: as given by equation (1) ensures that along the vertical
174: axis, the gravitational attraction of the central star will be
175: balanced by the vertical component of the pressure gradients
176: (HB03b).
177:
178: Because of their submicron sizes, the particles of the
179: background material of the nebula are
180: strongly coupled to the gas. The motions of these
181: particles are only affected by the gas drag.
182: On the other hand, since
183: molecular hydrogen obeys the equation of state
184: of an ideal gas, and because the nebula
185: is isothermal, any local enhancement in the gas density will
186: also enhance the pressure of the gas.
187: In the vicinity of such pressure enhanced regions,
188: any solid object undergoes radial migration toward the
189: location of the maximum pressure while approaching
190: the midplane \citep[][HB03a$\&$b]{Whip64}.
191: The rates of such migrations are small for small particles.
192: For the particles of the background, although
193: radial migration is extremely slow,
194: along with vertical descent, it results
195: in accumulation of particulate material at the
196: locations of density enhancements and also in the
197: vicinity of the midplane. In this study, it is assumed
198: that at any position in the nebula, the gas and
199: particle distribution functions
200: are proportional. That is,
201: ${\rho_{\rm {dust}}}(r,z)=f\,{\rho_g}(r,z)$, where
202: ${\rho_{\rm {dust}}}(r,z)$ is the distribution
203: function of the background material. The
204: solid/gas ratio $f$ can attain different values
205: at different positions and can also vary with time.
206: However, for simplicity, in this study, it is assumed to be
207: a constant number much smaller than unity.
208:
209:
210: \section{Equation of Motion}
211:
212: An object in the model nebula considered here is subject
213: to the gravitational attraction of the central star and
214: the drag force of the gas. Because of its small size, such an object,
215: similar to the particles of the background material,
216: shows the tendency of staying with the gas
217: and its dynamics is mostly driven by gas drag.
218: The tendency of solid particles in being coupled
219: to the gas is weaker for larger objects.
220: For a particle with a size within the range
221: considered here, its
222: coupling to the gas is less strong than the
223: coupling of the submicron-sized particles of the
224: background material. As a result, the particle
225: moves faster than the background material and
226: collides with them. Such collisions may result in
227: adhesion of the background particles to the moving object
228: and increase its mass. Such a change in the mass of the object
229: causes a change in its momentum and subsequently
230: affects its dynamics.
231:
232: The rate of the change of the momentum of an object
233: due to the sweeping of the background material is proportional
234: to the rate of the collision of the moving object with those particles.
235: In general, whether a collision occurs
236: between two objects depends on their relative velocity.
237: For an object with mass $m$ and radius $a$
238: at position $(r,z,\varphi)$ moving with velocity
239: ${\bf V}$ with respect to the central star,
240: the rate of change of its momentum due to the sweeping
241: of the background particles is equal to
242: \begin{equation}
243: {{d{\bf P}}\over {dt}}=\pi\, {\rho_{\rm{dust}}}(r,z)\,
244: {a^2}\,{{d\ell}\over {dt}}\, ({{\bf V}-{\bf U}}),
245: \end{equation}
246: \noindent
247: where the sticking coefficient is
248: equal to unity. In equation (3), ${\bf P}$
249: is the portion of the total momentum of the object that
250: changes by its coalescence with smaller background particles
251: and ${d\ell}=[{(dr)^2}+{(dz)^2}+{(rd\varphi)^2}]^{1/2}$ is
252: a line element along the path of the object.
253: The quantity ${\bf U}$ in equation (3) represents the
254: velocity of the particles of the medium along
255: the line element $d\ell$.
256: In writing equation (3), it has been assumed that,
257: while sweeping smaller particles, the
258: density of the object remains unchanged and it stays perfectly
259: spherical. It is important to emphasize
260: that in this equation $m$ and $a$ are functions of time,
261: and are related as
262: \begin{equation}
263: {{dm}\over {dt}}=\pi\, {\rho_{\rm{dust}}}(r,z)\,
264: {a^2}\,{{d\ell}\over {dt}}.
265: \end{equation}
266: \noindent
267: Equation (4) immediately implies
268: \begin{equation}
269: {{da}\over {dt}}={1\over 4}
270: \Bigl({{\rho_{\rm {dust}}}\over \rho}\Bigr)
271: {{d\ell}\over {dt}},
272: \end{equation}
273: \noindent
274: where $\rho$ is the density of the object.
275:
276: For small particles such as those
277: studied here, the magnitude of the velocity ${\bf V}$
278: is mainly dominated by its components in the radial
279: and vertical directions. As shown in HB03a$\&$b,
280: these components have larger values for larger objects.
281: That implies, while an object grows by sweeping the
282: particles of the background, it will move faster
283: in the radial and vertical directions. However,
284: due to the strong coupling to the gas,
285: for the particles of interest in this paper,
286: the rates of increase in radial and vertical motions are quite small.
287: As a result, the magnitude of the velocity of the object
288: relative to the background material
289: (i.e., $|{\bf V}-{\bf U}|$), is also small.
290: This implies that, when migrating toward the
291: location of a maximum gas density, the
292: object approaches the background particles very slowly.
293: Such a slow approach suggests a gentle encounter between the
294: moving object and the particle of the background followed
295: by the sweeping up of the smaller particle by the larger object.
296: Laboratory experiments have indicated that the collisional
297: coagulation of millimeter-sized and smaller particles
298: can well be approximated by such a sweeping process
299: \citep{Wurm98}.
300:
301: As mentioned above, the small velocities of the background particles
302: of the medium are the result of a strong coupling between the gas and
303: these particles. For these particles
304: such a coupling is so strong that with a
305: good approximation, one can replace ${\bf U}(r,z,\varphi)$ in
306: equation (3) with the velocity of the gas
307: at that position. As a result, equation (3) can be
308: written as
309: \begin{equation}
310: {{d{\bf P}}\over {dt}}=\pi\, {\rho_{\rm{dust}}}(r,z)\,
311: {a^2}\,{{d\ell}\over {dt}}\, {\bf V}_{\rm {rel}},
312: \end{equation}
313: \noindent
314: where ${{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}$
315: is the relative velocity of the object with respect
316: to the gas. In the cylindrical coordinate system
317: considered here, the radial, vertical and tangential
318: components of this velocity are, respectively, given by
319: ${\dot r},\, {\dot z}$, and $r({\dot \varphi}\,-\,{\omega_g})$,
320: where the motions of gas molecules along the $z$-axis
321: have been neglected. Because the gas is at hydrostatic
322: equilibrium, its angular velocity,
323: $\omega_g$, is slightly different from its Keplerian
324: value and is given by
325: \begin{equation}
326: {\omega_g^2} ={{GM}\over {({r^2}+{z^2})^{3/2}}} \,+\,
327: {1\over {r{\rho_g}(r,z)}}\,
328: {{\partial{{\cal P}_g}(r,z)}\over {\partial r}}.
329: \end{equation}
330: \vskip 5pt
331: \noindent
332: In this equation, ${{\cal P}_g}(r,z)$ is the pressure of the gas.
333:
334:
335: Considering the mass-growth equation (4),
336: the equation of motion of an object in our model nebula
337: is given by
338: \begin{equation}
339: m{\ddot{\bf R}}\,=\,
340: -\,{{GMm}\over {({r^2}+{z^2})^{3/2}}}\,{\bf R}\,-\,
341: \pi\, {\rho_{\rm{dust}}}(r,z)\,
342: {a^2}\,{{d\ell}\over {dt}}\, {\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}\,-\,
343: {{\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}}\,,
344: \end{equation}
345: where ${\bf R}(r,z)$ is the position vector of the particle
346: and
347: \begin{equation}
348: {\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}= {4\over 3}\pi{{a^2}\over{a+\lambda}}
349: {{\bar v}_{\rm{th}}}
350: \Bigl[\lambda{\rho_g}(r,z)+{{3{m_0}}\over {2\sigma}}\Bigr]
351: {{\bf V}_{\rm {rel}}}\,,
352: \end{equation}
353: \noindent
354: represents the drag force of the gas. In equation (9),
355: $\sigma$ is the collisional cross section between two hydrogen
356: molecules and $\lambda$ is their mean free path.
357:
358: Equation (9) has been written following
359: \citet{Sup00} and HB03a$\&$b whose
360: authors present ${\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}$ in a form that
361: combines Epstein and Stokes drags in one formula. Because
362: the focus of this paper is on the growth of 1-1000
363: micron-sized objects to 1 centimeter in radius,
364: as shown in HB03$\&$b, the gas
365: Reynolds number (Re) for these objects in
366: the model nebula presented here stays well below
367: unity. This implies that the drag coefficient $C_D$ in
368: ${\bf F}_{\rm {drag}}$ has to be taken to be equal to 24/Re
369: \citep[][HB03a$\&$b]{Sup00,Weid77}.
370:
371:
372: \section{Numerical Results}
373:
374: As mentioned in $\S$3, the distribution of the
375: background material is considered to be proportional
376: to the gas distribution function. \citet{Pod74} considered
377: $f=0.0034$ for a solar nebula with fully formed silicates and
378: metals \citep[also see][]{Weid88}. \citet{Sup00},
379: however, have considered $f=0.0045$ by assuming that
380: the abundance of ${{\rm H}_2}{\rm O}$ in the nebula
381: is the same as its solar value. They call this value
382: of $f$ nominal and have also considered
383: $f=0.045$ and 0.45 in order to study the effect of an
384: increase in the concentration of material on the
385: midplane, on collision and coagulation of small solids.
386: The value of $f$ in this study is chosen to be
387: 0.0034. From equation (4), it is evident that
388: larger values of $f$ will result in faster growth
389: of particles.
390:
391: The equation of motion of a particle [Eq.(8)] and the
392: growth equation (5) were integrated, numerically,
393: for initial radii ranging from
394: 1 to 1000 microns, and for different values of the
395: gas temperature. In all
396: these computations, the mass of the central star
397: was chosen to be equal to the mass of the Sun,
398: $\beta =1\,,{r_m}=1$ AU, and
399: ${\rho_0}={10^{-10}}$g cm$^{-3}$. The collisional
400: cross section of hydrogen molecules, $\sigma$, was
401: taken to be $2\times {10^{-15}}\,{\rm {cm}}^{-2}$,
402: and their mean free paths
403: $\lambda\,{\rm {(cm)}}=
404: 4\times {10^{-9}}/{\rho_g}(r,z)\,({\rm {g cm}}^{-3})$.
405: The initial value of the height of a particle above the
406: midplane was set equal to 1/10 of its initial
407: radial distance from the Sun.
408: The initial velocity of the particle along the
409: vertical axis was taken to be zero, and in the radial
410: direction, the particle was given an initial
411: Keplerian circular velocity.
412:
413: The growth of an object was followed until it reached
414: 1 cm in size. Although centimeter-sized objects can also grow
415: larger by sweeping smaller particles, a 1 cm radius
416: was chosen as the upper limit since the assumed
417: growth process, that is, sweeping of smaller particles,
418: is more effective for dust grains and micron-sized objects.
419: In a nebula with centimeter-sized particles, in
420: addition to sweeping of the submicron particles of the background,
421: there is also collision among centimeter-sized particles
422: which may result in their coagulation and/or
423: fragmentation. Such collisions can also generate dust particles.
424: The collisions of micron-sized particles, on the other hand,
425: are gentle and result in coalescence of the involved objects.
426: To avoid the complexities associated with treating centimeter-sized
427: particles then, the numerical simulations were stopped at $a=1$ cm.
428: Figure 2 shows the growth of a 10 micron-sized grain
429: with a density of 2 g cm$^{-3}$,
430: initially at $(r=3,z=0.3)$ AU. The gas temperature is 300 K.
431: As shown here, in a very short time, the particle
432: grows to 1 centimeter in size. During this time,
433: it undergoes radial migration
434: and also descends toward the midplane (Fig. 3).
435: For a comparison, the particle's
436: migrations without mass-growth have also been plotted.
437: As expected, the rates of the radial migration and
438: vertical descent of the particle increase by increasing its size.
439: Figures 3 and 4 clearly show that the combined effect of gas
440: drag and pressure gradients causes particles to rapidly
441: grow during their gas-drag induced migrations.
442:
443: A comparison between the two graphs of Figure 3 indicates that
444: during the time that the particle grows to 1 cm, it
445: descends toward the midplane faster than it migrates radially.
446: The actual path of the particle during this time has been shown
447: in Figure 4. Such a rapid vertical descent was also reported
448: by \citet{Nakagawa86}, where the authors have shown that,
449: for settling dust particles, the ratio of the vertical
450: and radial components of velocity is greater than one
451: and it increases by increasing the size of the particle.
452: The effect of
453: the radial component of the particle's velocity becomes
454: more pronounced when the particle reaches 1 cm in radius
455: and grows larger. \citet{Nakagawa86} call this phase
456: of the growth process the ``{\it{gas-dominated}}'' phase.
457: During this phase, the particle undergoes an over-damped
458: oscillatory motion in the vicinity of the midplane (HB03b).
459:
460: To better understand the relation between the growth
461: of the particle and its vertical and radial motions,
462: it is useful to calculate the time and the distance
463: of collision between the object and a submicron grain
464: of the background material. To define these quantities, recall that
465: it has been assumed that all collisions between
466: the object and particles of the background result in 100$\%$
467: sticking. The time of collision is therefore defined as the time
468: during which the mass of an object, $m(t)$, is increased
469: to $m(t)+{m_0}$, where $m_0$ is the mass of a background grain.
470: Because it has been assumed that after a collision,
471: the object maintains its spherical shape and will have
472: the same density, assuming a spherical shape for a
473: background particle, and also assuming that it has
474: similar density as the moving object, after a collision
475: the radius of the object changes from $a(t)$ to
476: $[{a^3}(t)+{a_0^3}]^{1/3}$, where $a_0$ is the radius
477: of a background grain. The rate of change of radius,
478: on the other hand, is given by equation (5). From this
479: equation and also considering that ${a_0}<<a(t)$,
480: the time of collision can be approximately written as
481: \begin{equation}
482: {\tau_c}(t)\,\simeq\,{{4{a_0^3}}\over {3{a^2}(t)}}\,
483: \Bigl({\rho\over {\rho_{\rm dust}}}\Bigr)\,
484: {\Bigl({{d\ell}\over {dt}}\Bigr)^{-1}}\,.
485: \end{equation}
486: \noindent
487: Equation (10) can also be obtained by introducing an
488: equivalent of a mean free path for the object. The
489: mean free path of the object, shown by $\lambda_d$,
490: is defined as the distance that the object travels
491: before it sweeps a background grain. Similar to the
492: equation of the mean free path of a gas molecule,
493: $\lambda_d$ can be written as
494: \begin{equation}
495: {\lambda_d}(t)\,=\,{{m_0}\over
496: {\pi{[a(t)+{a_0}]^2}{\rho_{\rm dust}}}}\,.
497: \end{equation}
498: \noindent
499: Equation (11) immediately results in equation (10),
500: noting that ${\lambda_d}=(d\ell/dt){\tau_c}$.
501:
502: Figure 5 shows the time of collision and the mean free path
503: of the 10 micron object of Figure 2 during its growth to 1 cm.
504: As shown here, the magnitudes of $\tau_c$ and $\lambda_d$ rapidly
505: decrease in time. To show that in more detail, the time of
506: growth has been divided into 4 segments.
507: As the object sweeps the background
508: material and grows in size, the rate of its gas-drag induced
509: migration becomes faster. As a result, it approaches a
510: background particle in a shorter time. Also,
511: as shown in Equation (11), the mean free path of
512: the object is inversely proportional to the square of
513: its instantaneous radius. Since $a(t)$ increases
514: at all times, $\lambda_d$ is a monotonically
515: decreasing function of time.
516:
517: Numerical simulations were also carried out for
518: different values of the gas temperature. Figure 6
519: shows the time of the growth of a 10 micron particle to 1 cm
520: for three different values of the temperature.
521: As shown here, the time of growth increases
522: at higher temperatures. That can be attributed to the
523: fact that the spatial distribution of the background
524: material is directly proportional to the gas density
525: function [Eq. (1)]. By increasing the gas temperature, the
526: FWHM of $\rho_g$ and $\rho_{\rm dust}$ increases (Fig. 7)
527: indicating an increase in the spatial distances
528: between the background particles. This causes the
529: time of collision to increase and the object will
530: take a longer time to grow larger at higher temperatures.
531:
532:
533: \section{Conclusions}
534:
535: The results of the numerical study of the growth rates
536: of small particles in the vicinity of a local density
537: enhancement of a solar nebula were presented. It was shown
538: that, as a consequence of migration toward the
539: location of a local density enhancement,
540: solid objects can rapidly grow in size by sweeping up
541: the smaller particles of the background material.
542: Particles of interest in this study had sizes
543: between 1 to 1000 micron and their growth-rates were
544: studied until they reached 1 cm in radius.
545: The results presented here indicate that, compared to
546: the time of settling and growth of dust particles
547: in a nebula without local gas density enhancements
548: \citep{Safronov,Weid80,Nakagawa81,Weid88},
549: in the vicinity of a local maximum gas density,
550: the combined effect of gas drag
551: and pressure gradients can increase the growth rates
552: of dust grains by one order of magnitude.
553:
554: In this study the focus was on the growth of small grains to
555: objects of 1 cm in size. Although centimeter-sized objects
556: can still acquire mass and grow larger
557: by sweeping up smaller particles, their dynamics is not
558: solely driven by gas drag and the sweeping process.
559: The velocities of such particles are large enough
560: to cause them to fragment and produce dust
561: when they collide. On the other hand, as noted by
562: \citet{Safronov}, \citet{Weid80}, \citet{Nakagawa81},
563: \citet{Nakagawa86}, and \citet{Weid88},
564: the largest that dust particles can grow to while settling
565: toward the midplane is centimeter-sized.
566: The concentration
567: of centimeter-sized particles in the vicinity of the
568: midplane creates a turbulent layer \citep{Weid80} which
569: requires a more detailed analysis.
570: All these introduce complexities in treating centimeter-sized
571: objects that are unnecessary
572: for the purpose of this study. Studies are, however, underway in which
573: the mutual interactions of centimeter-sized particles
574: and the effect of turbulence on their collision and
575: coalescence have been considered.
576:
577: The spatial density of the particulate background of the nebula was
578: chosen to be proportional to the gas distribution function.
579: The solid/gas ratio $f$ was chosen to be constant
580: and equal to 0.0034. This is a minimal value for $f$
581: that corresponds to a dust composition of metals and silicates
582: on the midplane of a standard nebula at 1 AU
583: \citep{Pod74,Weid80,Weid88}. In a more realistic
584: scenario, the value of $f$ is a function of
585: position and time. For instance, in the model
586: nebula considered here, as time passes, the
587: background material of the nebula settles toward
588: the midplane and also migrates toward $r=1$ AU,
589: where the gas distribution function maximizes.
590: This increases the dust/gas ratio around $r=1$ AU
591: on the midplane
592: and decreases $f$ at other locations. In such cases,
593: one has to take the time variation
594: of $f$ into consideration. However,
595: because in this study, the rates of radial and vertical
596: migration of the background material are smaller than
597: those of the objects of interest,
598: and also because it has been assumed that the
599: sticking probability is 100$\%$, which results in
600: faster growth of the particle, growing to
601: 1 cm in size occurs so rapidly that
602: the particles of the background
603: will not have enough time to undergo appreciable
604: radial and vertical migrations.
605:
606: As mentioned earlier, the focus of this study has been
607: on the growth of particles to 1 cm in size.
608: For such small objects, the assumption of growth merely
609: due to sweeping up smaller particles is quite plausible
610: since these objects are coupled to the gas and they
611: approach one another slowly. Once the sizes of objects
612: increase 1 cm, their collisions may result in adhesion
613: and/or fragmentation. As a result, their growth will not
614: be entirely due to sweeping up of smaller particles and
615: will be affected by their individual velocities.
616: Replacing the relative velocities of such objects
617: with their velocities relative to the gas is no longer
618: a valid approximation. In such cases, one has to
619: follow individual particles and consider their
620: velocities relative to one another.
621: Such an extension of this work
622: is currently in preparation for publication.
623:
624:
625: \acknowledgments
626:
627: I am thankful to Alan Boss for critically reading the
628: original manuscript.
629: This work is partially supported by the NASA Origins of the Solar
630: System Program under Grant NAG5-11569 and by the NASA Astrobiology
631: Institute under Cooperative Agreement NCC2-1056.
632:
633:
634: \begin{thebibliography}{}
635: \bibitem[Haghighipour $\&$ Boss (2003a)]{Hag03a}
636: Haghighipour, N. $\&$ Boss, A. P. 2003, \apj, 583, 996
637: \bibitem[Haghighipour $\&$ Boss (2003b)]{Hag03b}
638: Haghighipour, N. $\&$ Boss, A. P. 2003, \apj, 598, December 1 issue
639: (astro-ph/0305594)
640: \bibitem[Nakagawa et al. (1981)]{Nakagawa81}
641: Nakagawa, Y., Nakazawa, K. $\&$ Hayashi, C. 1981, Icarus, 45, 517
642: \bibitem[Nakagawa et al.(1986)]{Nakagawa86}
643: Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M. $\&$ Hayashi. C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375
644: \bibitem[Podolak $\&$ Cameron (1974)]{Pod74}
645: Podolak, M., $\&$ Cameron, A. G. W. 1974, Icarus, 22, 123
646: \bibitem[Safronov (1969)]{Safronov}
647: Safronov, V. S. 1969, Evolution of Protoplanetary Cloud
648: and Formation of Earth and Planets (Moscow, Nauka)
649: \bibitem[Supulver $\&$ Lin (2000)]{Sup00}
650: Supulver, K. D., $\&$ Lin, D. N. C. 2000, Icarus, 146, 525
651: \bibitem[Weidenschilling (1977)]{Weid77}
652: Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, \mnras, 180, 57
653: \bibitem[Weidenschilling (1980)]{Weid80}
654: Weidenschilling, S. J. 1980, Icarus, 44, 172
655: \bibitem[Weidenschilling (1984)]{Weid84}
656: Weidenschilling, S. J. 1984, Icarus, 60, 553
657: \bibitem[Weidenschilling (1988)]{Weid88}
658: Weidenschilling, S. J. 1988, in Meteorites and the Early
659: Solar System, Ed. J. Kerridge, $\&$ M. S. Matthews
660: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 350
661: \bibitem[Whipple (1964)]{Whip64}
662: Whipple, F. L. 1964, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 52, 565
663: \bibitem[Wurm $\&$ Blum (1998)]{Wurm98}
664: Wurm, G., $\&$ Blum, J. 1998, Icarus, 132, 125
665: \end{thebibliography}
666:
667:
668:
669:
670:
671: \clearpage
672:
673: \begin{figure}
674: \plotone{f1a.eps}
675: \plotone{f1b.eps}
676: \plotone{f1c.eps}
677: \vskip -9.1in
678: \caption{Graphs of the gas distribution function.
679: The temperature of the gas is 300 K, $r_{\rm m}$=1 AU,
680: $\beta=1$, and ${\rho_0}={10^{-10}}$ g cm$^{-3}$.
681: The top graph depicts the radial distribution of the gas
682: at different heights above the midplane. The middle graph
683: shows a topview of the nebula at $z=0.3$ AU and the bottom
684: graph shows its topview at $z=0.15$ AU.
685: \label{fig1}}
686: \end{figure}
687:
688:
689:
690: \clearpage
691:
692: \begin{figure}
693: \plotone{f2.eps}
694: \vskip -2.5in
695: \caption{Graph of the radius versus time
696: for a particle with an initial
697: radius of 10 micron. The initial position
698: of the particle is (3,0.3) AU, and the physical
699: properties of the gas are similar to those of Figure 1.
700: \label{fig2}}
701: \end{figure}
702:
703:
704:
705: \clearpage
706:
707: \begin{figure}
708: \plotone{f3a.eps}
709: \plotone{f3b.eps}
710: \vskip -3in
711: \caption{Graphs of the radial migration (top) and
712: vertical descent (bottom) of the 10 micron-sized particle
713: of Figure 2. The solid lines
714: correspond to $f=0.0034$, and the dashed lines
715: represent the radial and vertical motions with no
716: mass-growth $(f=0)$. The horizontal axis
717: represents the time of the growth of the particle
718: to 1 centimeter.
719: \label{fig3}}
720: \end{figure}
721:
722:
723:
724: \clearpage
725:
726: \begin{figure}
727: \plotone{f4.eps}
728: \vskip -2in
729: \caption{The path of the 10 micron-sized particle
730: of Figure 3. As shown here, during its growth to
731: 1 centimeter, the motion of the particle is mostly
732: vertical.
733: \label{fig4}}
734: \end{figure}
735:
736:
737:
738:
739: \clearpage
740:
741: \begin{figure}
742: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
743: \end{figure}
744: \begin{figure}
745: \plottwo{f5c.eps}{f5d.eps}
746: \end{figure}
747: \begin{figure}
748: \plottwo{f5e.eps}{f5f.eps}
749: \end{figure}
750: \begin{figure}
751: \plottwo{f5g.eps}{f5h.eps}
752: \vskip -0.7in
753: \caption{Graphs of the time of collision between a growing
754: object and a particle of the background (left), and
755: the mean free path of the object (right). The horizontal
756: axes represent the time of growth. The initial radius
757: of the object was 10 micron, and it was place at (3,0.3) AU.
758: The physical properties of the nebula are similar to those
759: of Figure 1. Note different scales on vertical axes.
760: \label{fig5}}
761: \end{figure}
762:
763:
764:
765:
766: \clearpage
767:
768: \begin{figure}
769: \plotone{f6.eps}
770: \vskip -2.5in
771: \caption{Graph of the growth of a 10 micron-sized
772: particle with a density of 2 g cm$^{-3}$
773: for different values of the gas temperature.
774: The particle was initially at (3,0.3) AU.
775: \label{fig6}}
776: \end{figure}
777:
778:
779:
780: \clearpage
781:
782: \begin{figure}
783: \plotone{f7.eps}
784: \vskip -2.5in
785: \caption{Graph of the vertical distribution
786: of the background material at $r=3$ AU for different
787: values of the gas temperature.
788: \label{fig7}}
789: \end{figure}
790:
791:
792:
793: \end{document}
794:
795:
796: