1: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \sloppy
4:
5: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage{graphics}
8:
9: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
10:
11: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{
12: \def\@captype{figure}
13: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
14: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
15:
16: \newenvironment{inlinetable}{
17: \def\@captype{table}
18: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
19: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
20:
21: \shorttitle{HI kinematics in a massive spiral galaxy at z=0.89}
22: \shortauthors{Koopmans \& de Bruyn}
23:
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: \title{HI kinematics in a massive spiral galaxy at z=0.89}
27: \author{L.V.E. Koopmans} \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute,
28: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}
29:
30: \smallskip
31:
32: \author{A.G. de Bruyn} \affil{NFRA--ASTRON, P.O. Box 2, Dwingeloo 9700
33: AA, The Netherlands\\Kapteyn Astronomical Institute P.O. Box 800,
34: NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands}
35:
36: \smallskip
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: We present a kinematic model of the neutral-hydrogen in the spiral
40: galaxy of the lens system PKS1830$-$211, based on a Multi Element
41: Radio-Linked Interferometer (MERLIN) 1.4--GHz radio map and the
42: integrated and redshifted 21--cm hydrogen absorption-line profile as
43: measured with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT).
44: Degeneracies in the models do not allow a unique determination of the
45: kinematic center and forthcoming deeper Hubble Space Telescope
46: observations with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) are required
47: to break this degeneracy. Even so, we measure the inclination of the
48: hydrogen disk: $i=(17-32)^\circ$, indicating a close-to face-on spiral
49: galaxy. The optical depth increases with radius over the extent of
50: the Einstein ring, suggesting HI depletion towards the lens
51: center. The latter could be due to star formation or conversion of HI
52: in to molecular hydrogen because of a higher metalicity/dust content
53: in the galaxy center. The neutral hydrogen optical depth gives $N_{\rm
54: HI}=2 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ at $r=5.0 \,h^{-1}_{70}$~kpc in the
55: disk ($T_{\rm s}=100$~K), comparable to local spiral galaxies. Our
56: study shows that planned new radio telescopes (i.e.~ALMA, LOFAR and
57: SKA) -- which will discover large numbers of similar lens systems --
58: are powerful new tools to probe the internal structure, kinematics and
59: evolution of spiral galaxies in detail to $z\ga 1$, as well as their
60: neutral-hydrogen (and molecular) content, thereby complementing
61: studies of HI emission from spirals at $z \la 1$ and damped
62: Ly--$\alpha$ systems to $z\gg 1$.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{gravitational lensing --- galaxies: structure --- ISM:
66: kinematics and dynamics --- line: profiles}
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69:
70: The gravitational lens PKS 1830--211 (e.g. Pramesh Rao \& Subrahmanyan
71: 1988; Subrahmanyan et al. 1990) is the brightest known radio lens in
72: the sky. The source at $z$=2.51 (Lidman et al. 1999) is extended and
73: lensed into an Einstein ring (e.g. Jauncey et al. 1991) by a
74: high-redshift spiral galaxy at $z$ = 0.89 (Wiklind \& Combes 1996;
75: Gerin et al. 1997; Mathur \& Nair 1997; Chengalur, de Bruyn \&
76: Narasimha 1999). In addition, a time-delay of 26$\pm$5 days between
77: the two images of the lensed core has been measured (Lovell et
78: al. 1998; see also Wiklind \& Alloin 2002). New monitoring data in
79: hand is expected to yield an improved measurement of this delay
80: (J.\,Winn, private communications). The structure of the Einstein ring
81: can be used to place constraints on the mass distribution of the lens
82: (Kochanek \& Narayan 1992; Nair, Narasimha, \& Rao 1993; Wiklind \&
83: Alloin 2002). Were it not that PKS 1830--211 is seen through the
84: Galactic disk (i.e. $l=+12^\circ$, $b=-5^\circ$) -- leading to
85: considerable optical extinction ($A_I=0.8$ mag) and a field crowed by
86: stars (e.g. Winn et al. 2002; Courbin et al. 2002) -- this lens system
87: would be well-suited to determine the Hubble Constant. Due to the
88: severe extinction it has proven difficult to precisely determine the
89: center of the lens galaxy. A number of mutually inconsistent lens
90: centers have been published over the years (e.g. Kochanek \& Narayan
91: 1992; Nair et al. 1993; Lehar et al. 2000). Most recently, using the
92: same HST observations, two different interpretations of the lens
93: center were published (Winn et al. 2002; Courbin et al. 2002). The
94: inability to measure the lens center with the currently available
95: observations severely limits the use of PKS\,1830$-$211 to determine
96: H$_0$. Forthcoming HST--ACS observations, however, will be able to
97: settle this question.
98:
99: Besides being interesting because of H$_0$, the lens galaxy in
100: PKS\,1830--211 is the highest-redshift spiral lens galaxy known. The
101: brightness of the lensed source has allowed a unique study of the
102: molecular (e.g. CO and OH) and atomic (i.e. HI) interstellar medium
103: (ISM) content (Wiklind \& Combes 1996; Gerin et al. 1997; Mathur \&
104: Nair 1997; Chengalur, de Bruyn \& Narasimha 1999) in a spiral galaxy
105: as seen $\approx$8\,$h_{70}^{-1}$~Gyr ago. Although only a single galaxy,
106: it provides a test case for similar systems anticipated to be
107: discovered with planned instruments such as ALMA, LOFAR and SKA.
108:
109: The time base-line covered by these galaxies provide enough leverage
110: to study the evolution of the mass-distribution and ISM of spiral
111: galaxies in the redshift-regime where most of their evolution is
112: expected to occur and also connects up to studies of damped
113: Ly--$\alpha$ systems (e.g. Kauffmann 1996; Mo, Mao \& White 1998).
114:
115: In this letter, we make a first attempt to model the kinematics of HI
116: in this high-redshift spiral galaxy, improving upon a previous more
117: simple analysis by Chengalur et al. (1999). One of the initial aims,
118: i.e. the determination of an independent kinematic lens center, has
119: proven too difficult given the current data, but constraints on the
120: radial distribution of HI, its column density and kinematics are
121: obtained.
122:
123: \begin{inlinefigure}
124: \vspace{0.3cm}
125: \begin{center}
126: \resizebox{0.95\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1.eps}}
127: \end{center}
128: \figcaption{The MERLIN 1.4--GHz continuum maps of PKS\,1830--211
129: (North is up and East is left). Contours start at 25 mJy/beam and
130: increase by factors of two. Overplotted is the best-fit kinematic
131: model for the lens center of Nair et al. (1993). The two crosses
132: indate the lensed cores A (NE) and B (SW). The thin elliptical
133: contours indicate constant optical depth increasing by factors of 2
134: outward. The optical depth contour passing through image B has
135: $\tau$=0.064.}
136: \end{inlinefigure}
137:
138: \section{MERLIN \& WSRT Observations}
139:
140: MERLIN long-track observations of PKS1830--211 were obtained at 1.4,
141: 1.7 and 4.9 GHz on, respectively, March 26, 25 and 8 in 1999. The data
142: were flux and phase calibrated at the telescope. We subsequently map
143: the data using DIFMAP (Shepherd 1997) following standard procedures,
144: but perform additional self-calibration in the case that small phase
145: and flux calibration errors are still present in the data. The
146: resulting map at 1.4 GHz is shown in Fig.1. All maps will be presented
147: in more detail in forthcoming publications. The 1.4--GHz map is used
148: as a representation of the surface brightness distribution against
149: which we observe the HI distribution in the lens galaxy. We use it to
150: calculate the HI absorption line. We note that absorption really
151: occurs at $1.42/(1+z_l)=0.75$~GHz, for which we do not have a radio
152: map. However, the difference between the 1.4 and 1.7 GHz maps are
153: small and we expect the radio map at 0.75 GHz to be quite similar to
154: that at 1.4 GHz. Using the 1.7 and 1.4 GHz radio maps to construct an
155: estimated 0.75--GHz radio map is difficult given the different UV
156: sampling. We therefore opt to solely use the 1.4--GHz map.
157:
158: The multi-frequency frontends of the WSRT were used to obtain a high
159: signal-to-noise profile of the HI absorption line at a frequency of
160: 753 MHz. Compared to the previous observations of Chengalur et
161: al. (1999) the data have superior spectral resolution and wider
162: bandwidth as well as a better spectral baseline. In total we obtained
163: 5.5~hrs of data on PKS1830--211 with 12 MFFE's on October 25, 1998. A
164: backend bandwidth of 2.5~MHZ was used with 256 channels, giving
165: 3.9~\kms\ per channel. The data were Hanning smoothed to give a
166: resolution at halfwidth of 7.9~\kms. The resulting normalized line
167: profile is shown in Fig.2. Errors are estimated from the rms scatter
168: between channels at the baseline level well away from the line
169: profile.
170:
171: \section{Kinematic Model}
172:
173: We model the HI absorption line, assuming a thin axisymmetric HI disk
174: with an optical depth $\tau(r)=\tau_0\times (r/r_0)^\gamma$. The disk
175: has a kinematic center $(x_k,y_k)$ on the sky, an inclination $i$ and
176: position angle $\theta$ (measured north to east on the sky). The HI
177: gas has a constant circular velocity $v_c$, as expected for an
178: isothermal mass distribution of the lens galaxy and a systemic
179: velocity $v_s$. The latter allows for a small velocity difference with
180: respect to the redshift determined from molecular lines. For each
181: surface brightness element $\Sigma_v(\vec{x})$ of the lensed radio
182: source [$\vec{x}=(x,y)$ are coordinates on the sky], we then
183: calculate~(i) the radial component $v_r(\vec{x})$ of the velocity
184: vector of the HI gas, where the line-of-sight pierces the disk, and
185: (ii) the optical depth $\tau(\vec{x})$ for the sight line normal to
186: the disk, which is then multiplied by $\cos(i)^{-1}$ to include the
187: effect of inclination. We assume that the HI absorption line is
188: isotropically (Gaussian) broadened by $\sigma_{\rm HI}$ (=FWHM/2.35),
189: constant as a function of radius.
190:
191: We re-normalize the flux-density of the source, $\int
192: \Sigma_v(\vec{x}) {\rm d}^2\vec{x}$, to unity. The observed line
193: profile becomes a convolution of a Gaussian velocity profile with the
194: unbroadened line-profile\footnote{This is correct only if the
195: $\sigma_{\rm HI}$ is not a function of $\vec{x}$ and note also that
196: the Gaussian is not normalized.}, i.e.:
197: \begin{equation}
198: I(v)=\left\{{e^{v^2/2 \sigma_{\rm HI}^2}}\right\} \star
199: \left\{\int_{v\equiv v_r(\vec{x})}
200: \Sigma_v(\vec{x})\,\left[1-\tau(\vec{x})\right] ~{\rm d}\vec{x}
201: \right\}
202: \end{equation}
203: which is unity in the case of no absorption. Images of the radio
204: sources -- even though they have a continuous mapping and surface
205: brightness distribution -- are always affected by the finite beam
206: size. Hence, instead of using the MERLIN image of PKS1830$-$211 to
207: model $\Sigma_v(\vec{x})$, we instead use the clean
208: components\footnote{Clean components are delta functions with finite
209: flux that, convolved with a Gaussian beam, reproduce the radio map as
210: presented in Fig.1. In total our model of the source brightness
211: distribution includes 350 clean components.}. In this case the
212: integral in Eq.1 is simply replaced by a sum over the clean
213: components. The resulting absorption line profile should therefore
214: more closely resemble the underlying line profile\footnote{The
215: line-width $\sigma_{\rm HI}$ might increase slightly because of
216: unaccounted for minor velocity gradients between clean components.}
217: for the deconvolved radio image of PKS1830$-$211. The free parameters
218: in our kinematic model are $\{i,\theta,v_s,\sigma_{\rm
219: HI},\tau_0,\gamma\}$. We furthermore set $v_c=\sqrt{2}\times
220: \sigma_{\rm DM} = 266$\,\kms, which follows from the isothermal lens
221: mass model (i.e. a dark-matter dispersion of $\sigma_{\rm
222: DM}$=188\,\kms; in agreement with Winn et al. 2002), $r_0=0\farcs5$
223: (arbitrary value but roughly the Einstein radius), and the kinematic
224: center is set to the lens centers inferred from the different authors
225: discussed in Sect. 1. We register the optical and radio data,
226: associating the bright radio cores with the optical quasar images.
227:
228: \section{Results}
229:
230: Constraints on the kinematic model are the following: (i) the WSRT HI
231: line-profile with 238 channels with 3.9~\kms\ width
232: each, with an average 1--$\sigma$ measurement error of 0.00147 (Fig.2;
233: three channels are removed due to band-pass edge uncertainties), and
234: (ii) the velocity difference between components A and B of
235: 147$(\pm$1)\,\kms\ (Wiklind \& Combes 1998). We minimize $\chi^2$ -- as
236: commonly defined -- using a Downhill Simplex method with simulated
237: annealing (Press et al. 1992), varying all six free parameters
238: simultaneously.
239:
240: We only explore models where the kinematic centers have been fixed at
241: positions (notably often mutually exclusive) as previously published
242: in the literature. Given degeneracies in the kinematic model, the
243: current spatially unresolved line-profile and potential other issues
244: (see below), we feel that a more sophisticated kinematic model is at
245: this point not warranted.
246:
247: \begin{table*}
248: \centering
249: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccl}
250: \hline
251: \hline
252: $x_k$ ($''$) & $y_k$ ($''$) & $i$ ($^\circ$) & $\theta$ ($^\circ$) & $\sigma_{\rm HI}$ (km\,s$^{-1}$) & $\gamma$ & $\tau_0$ & $\chi^2$ & Reference\\
253: \hline
254: $+$0.532 & $-$0.420 & 30 & $-$15 & 40 & 0.76 & 0.076 & 443 & Nair et al. (1993)\\
255: $+$0.519 & $-$0.511 & 17 & $+$23 & 48 & 0.65 & 0.078 & 446 & Courbin et al. (2002), G\\
256: $+$0.500 & $-$0.450 & 32 & $-$15 & 39 & 0.66 & 0.079 & 443 & Lehar et al. (2000)\\
257: $+$0.350 & $-$0.510 & 17 & $+$28 & 48 & 2.14 & 0.065 & 446 & Kochanek \& Narayan (1992)\\
258: $+$0.328 & $-$0.486 & 20 & $+$11 & 47 & 3.62 & 0.057 & 449 & Winn et al. (2002)\\
259: $+$0.285 & $-$0.722 & 21 & $+$34 & 48 & 1.73 & 0.049 & 449 & Courbin et al. (2002), Sp\\
260: \hline
261: \hline
262: \end{tabular}\\~\\
263: Table 1 --- Best-fits parameters of the kinematic models (see Sect.\,3--4, also for errors).
264: \end{table*}
265:
266:
267: The results are listed in Table~1. A number of conclusions can be
268: drawn:
269:
270: \medskip\noindent {\bf (1)} The inclination of the HI disk,
271: $i=(17-32)^\circ \pm 2^\circ$ (1--$\sigma$), is robust and nearly
272: independent from the assumed kinematic center of the lens galaxy. This
273: confirms that the lens galaxy is most likely a close-to face-on spiral
274: galaxy, as previously proposed (e.g. Winn et al. 2002).
275:
276: \medskip\noindent {\bf (2)} The position angle of the disk varies
277: between $\theta = +34^\circ$ and $-15^\circ$. This result is clearly
278: less robust than the inclination angle, due to degeneracies with the
279: inclination and kinematic center.
280:
281: \medskip\noindent {\bf (3)} The line-width, $\sigma_{\rm
282: HI}=(39-48)\pm 1$~\kms, is also robust. The value appears high
283: compared with local spiral galaxies and might be the result of
284: increased star formation, stirring up the HI gas to higher turbulent
285: velocities. The line-width of molecular gas is also relatively high,
286: $\sim$30~\kms (Wiklind \& Combes 1996). Even though lower than what we
287: infer, such difference can be expected between colder molecular gas,
288: presumably in clouds, and HI in the atomic (versus molecular)
289: phase. However, the use of clean components to represent the, in
290: reality, smooth Einstein Ring could somewhat broaden the fitted
291: line-width because they undersample the velocity field (i.e.~the field
292: in between clean components will shows a velocity gradient that is not
293: sampled). The spectral resolution is negligible.
294:
295: \medskip\noindent {\bf (4)} The optical depth varies considerably as a
296: function of radius for some of the models, with typical 1--$\sigma$
297: statistical errors on $\tau_0$ of $\pm$0.01. In particular the models
298: with the lens centers from Winn et al. (2002), Kochanek \& Narayan
299: (1992) and Courbin et al. (2002; only for model Sp) seem to prefer
300: steeply {\sl rising} optical depths as a function of radius
301: (i.e. $\gamma \gg 0$). The other models also prefer rising optical
302: depths, but more moderately. All models give a considerable HI
303: depletion toward the lens center, as is also seen in some local
304: galaxies, which could be the result of strong past and ongoing star
305: formation (see also --3-- above). This depletion can already been
306: inferred from the fact that, even though image B is closer the
307: inferred lens centers, it experiences less HI absorption (Fig.2).
308:
309: \medskip\noindent {\bf (5)} Plotting $\tau(r)$, we find that all
310: models give $\tau\approx 0.085$ at $r=5.0\,h^{-1}_{70}$~kpc along the
311: disk, except for the lens center (Sp) from Courbin et al. (2002) for
312: which 0.06 is found. However, from a lensing perspective it is
313: unlikely that the latter position is that of the dominant lens galaxy.
314: The HI column density is $N_{\rm HI}= 4.6\times 10^{21}\, (T_{\rm
315: s}/100~{\rm K}) \,(\sigma_{\rm HI}/{{\rm km}\,{\rm
316: s}^{-1}})\,\tau$~cm$^{-2}$ (given our definition of the line profile
317: in Eq.\,1). Assuming a ``canonical'' value of the unknown spin
318: temperature of $T_{\rm s}=100$~K, as in Chengalur et al. (1999),
319: $\tau\approx 0.085$ at a radius of 5\,$h^{-1}_{70}$~kpc in the disk
320: and $\sigma_{\rm HI}\approx 44$~\kms, we find $N_{\rm HI}\approx
321: 2\times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$, similar to what was already found by
322: Chengalur et al. and also similar to that of local spiral galaxies and
323: damped Ly$\alpha$ systems.
324:
325: \begin{inlinefigure}
326: \vspace{0.3cm}
327: \begin{center}
328: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2.eps}}
329: \end{center}
330: \figcaption{The WSRT HI--line profile overplotted with the best-fit
331: kinematic model from Fig.1. Errors are 0.00147 in normalised units.
332: The velocity is in units of \kms. A and B indicate the velocity
333: positions of the two lensed cores of source.}
334: \end{inlinefigure}
335:
336: \medskip
337: We note that the range of parameter values are typically larger than
338: their 1--$\sigma$ errors, since the former reflects the change as
339: function of chosen kinematic center.
340:
341: The results have to be seen in light of some additional cautionary
342: notes: First, we see that the $\chi^2$ values are $\sim$2~times the
343: DOF=229. This is mostly due to a mismatch between the model and the
344: observed HI line around A and B (see Fig.2). The lensed core of the
345: source, however, is known to be time-variable (Lovell et
346: al. 1998). Since, the MERLIN and WSRT data set were not obtained at
347: exactly the same epoch (5~months in between), this might explain the
348: mismatch. WSRT data from different epochs (not presented here) indeed
349: show some minor differences between the observed HI lines.
350:
351: Second, our models are azimuthally symmetric and assume an HI covering
352: factor of 100\%. If the HI column density (i.e. optical depth) is a
353: function of angle along the disk, it could change the inferred
354: kinematic results. Even though we believe the effect to be small, it
355: can not fully be excluded. A spatially resolved HI absorption line
356: profile would help to eliminate this possibility.
357:
358: Third, we have assumed the 1.4--GHz maps to be a reasonable
359: representation of the 0.75--GHz continuum structure of the lensed
360: source, as discussed previously. If the spectral index is a strong
361: function along the lensed source, it might also affect the results.
362:
363: Fourth, we have assumed that the rotation curve of the spiral galaxy
364: is flat. This is consistent with observations of local spiral galaxies
365: with similar rotation velocities, but might not be a correct
366: assumption for a galaxy at $z=0.89$. Again, a spatially resolved HI
367: absorption line profile would be able to test this assumption.
368:
369: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}
370:
371: We have modeled the neutral hydrogen (HI) distribution and kinematics
372: in the spiral galaxy of the lens system PKS 1830$-$211 at $z$=0.89,
373: using a MERLIN 1.4--GHz continuum map of the Einstein ring and an WSRT
374: HI absorption line. The main numerical results are summarized in
375: Sect.~4.
376:
377: In general, we find that the HI disk is seen close-to face-on, as
378: previously suggested (e.g. Winn et al. 2002). We find evidence for HI
379: depletion toward the galaxy center and a column density of $N_{\rm
380: HI}\approx 2\times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ at 5\,$h^{-1}_{70}$~kpc,
381: comparable to those of low redshift spiral galaxies. Our data are
382: insufficient to discriminate between the different lens centers as
383: published by different authors and we have to await new HST--ACS
384: observations.
385:
386: We emphasize some cautionary notes, listed in Sect.4, regarding our
387: results. Even so, we believe that our analysis is a good first
388: attempt to constrain the kinematics of neutral hydrogen in a spiral
389: galaxy at relatively high redshift, within the current observational
390: limits, and should be regarded as such.
391:
392: Our analysis shows that the combination of HI observations with
393: gravitational lensing -- in particular radio Einstein rings --
394: potentially provide a strong tool to study spiral galaxies to high
395: redshifts. A similar program to combine lensing and stellar
396: kinematics of E/S0 galaxies out to $z\sim1$ is currently underway
397: (i.e. the Lenses Structure \& Dynamics (LSD) Survey; e.g. Koopmans \&
398: Treu 2002, 2003; Treu \& Koopmans 2002).
399:
400: We anticipate that {\sl spatially resolved} HI absorption line
401: profiles and radio continuum images at the redshifted HI-line
402: frequency can be obtained of many similar systems in the future with
403: e.g. ALMA, LOFAR and SKA. This would resolve many of the issues
404: outlined in the paper and provide us with an unprecedented probe into
405: the internal structure of spiral galaxies at high redshifts. By
406: probing spiral lenses over a range of redshifts, their evolution can
407: be studied (e.g. Koopmans \& de Bruyn 1999), providing a complementary
408: tool to study spiral galaxies between those at low redshifts using HI
409: emission and damped Ly-$\alpha$ systems at very high redshifts.
410:
411: We note, however, that none of the other studies can provide {\sl two
412: independent} constraints, i.e. from lensing and kinematics, on the
413: same mass distribution of the spiral galaxy. Their combination can
414: break degeneracies inherent to each technique separately. Our results,
415: admittedly based on a single system, show that very interesting
416: constraints can be obtained for spiral galaxies at high redshifts.
417:
418: \acknowledgments We like to thank Tom Muxlow for doing the initial
419: calibration of the MERLIN data. We also thank Eric Agol, Ron Allen,
420: Mike Fall and Mario Livio for comments and discussions. LVEK
421: acknowledges the support from an STScI Fellowship grant. MERLIN is a
422: National Facility operated by the University of Manchester at Jodrell
423: Bank Observatory on behalf of PPARC. The Westerbork Synthesis Radio
424: Telescope (WSRT) is operated by the Netherlands Fouondation for
425: Research in Astronomy (ASTRON) with the financial support from the
426: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
427:
428: \begin{thebibliography}{}
429:
430: \bibitem[Chengalur, de Bruyn, \& Narasimha(1999)]{1999A&A...343L..79C}
431: Chengalur, J.~N., de Bruyn, A.~G., \& Narasimha, D.\ 1999, \aap, 343, L79
432:
433: \bibitem[Courbin, Meylan, Kneib, \& Lidman(2002)]{2002ApJ...575...95C}
434: Courbin, F., Meylan, G., Kneib, J.-P., \& Lidman, C.\ 2002, \apj, 575, 95
435:
436: \bibitem[Gerin et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...488L..31G} Gerin, M., Phillips,
437: T.~G., Benford, D.~J., Young, K.~H., Menten, K.~M., \& Frye, B.\ 1997,
438: \apjl, 488, L31
439:
440: \bibitem[Jauncey et al.(1991)]{1991Natur.352..132J} Jauncey, D.~L.~et al.\
441: 1991, \nat, 352, 132
442:
443: \bibitem[Kauffmann(1996)]{1996MNRAS.281..475K} Kauffmann, G.\ 1996, \mnras,
444: 281, 475
445:
446: \bibitem[Kochanek \& Narayan(1992)]{1992ApJ...401..461K} Kochanek, C.~S.~\&
447: Narayan, R.\ 1992, \apj, 401, 461
448:
449: \bibitem[Koopmans \& Treu(2003)]{2003ApJ...583..606K} Koopmans, L.~V.~E.~\&
450: Treu, T.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 606
451:
452: \bibitem[Koopmans \& Treu(2002)]{2002ApJ...568L...5K} Koopmans, L.~V.~E.~\&
453: Treu, T.\ 2002, \apjl, 568, L5
454:
455: \bibitem[]{} Koopmans, L.V.E., \& de Bruyn, A.G., 1999, in
456: Perspectives on Radio Astronomy: Science with Large Antenna Arrays,
457: ed. M.P. van Haarlem, p\,213
458:
459: \bibitem[Leh{\' a}r et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...536..584L} Leh{\' a}r, J.~et
460: al.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 584
461:
462: \bibitem[Lidman et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...514L..57L} Lidman, C., Courbin, F.,
463: Meylan, G., Broadhurst, T., Frye, B., \& Welch, W.~J.~W.\ 1999, \apjl, 514,
464: L57
465:
466: \bibitem[Lovell et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...508L..51L} Lovell, J.~E.~J.,
467: Jauncey, D.~L., Reynolds, J.~E., Wieringa, M.~H., King, E.~A., Tzioumis,
468: A.~K., McCulloch, P.~M., \& Edwards, P.~G.\ 1998, \apjl, 508, L51
469:
470: \bibitem[Mathur \& Nair(1997)]{1997ApJ...484..140M} Mathur, S.~\& Nair, S.\
471: 1997, \apj, 484, 140
472:
473: \bibitem[Mo, Mao, \& White(1998)]{1998MNRAS.295..319M} Mo, H.~J., Mao, S.,
474: \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1998, \mnras, 295, 319
475:
476: \bibitem[Nair, Narasimha, \& Rao(1993)]{1993ApJ...407...46N} Nair, S.,
477: Narasimha, D., \& Rao, A.~P.\ 1993, \apj, 407, 46
478:
479: \bibitem[Pramesh Rao \& Subrahmanyan(1988)]{1988MNRAS.231..229P} Pramesh
480: Rao, A.~\& Subrahmanyan, R.\ 1988, \mnras, 231, 229
481:
482: \bibitem[Press, Teukolsky, Vetterling, \&
483: Flannery(1992)]{1992nrca.book.....P} Press, W.~H., Teukolsky, S.~A.,
484: Vetterling, W.~T., \& Flannery, B.~P.\ 1992, Cambridge: University Press,
485: 1992, 2nd ed.
486:
487: \bibitem[Shepherd(1997)]{1997adass...6...77S} Shepherd, M.~C.\ 1997, ASP
488: Conf.~Ser.~125: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI, 6, 77
489:
490: \bibitem[Subrahmanyan, Narasimha, Pramesh-Rao, \&
491: Swarup(1990)]{1990MNRAS.246..263S} Subrahmanyan, R., Narasimha, D.,
492: Pramesh-Rao, A., \& Swarup, G.\ 1990, \mnras, 246, 263
493:
494: \bibitem[Treu \& Koopmans(2002)]{2002ApJ...575...87T} Treu, T.~\& Koopmans,
495: L.~V.~E.\ 2002, \apj, 575, 87
496:
497: \bibitem[Wiklind \& Combes(1996)]{1996Natur.379..139W} Wiklind, T.~\&
498: Combes, F.\ 1996, \nat, 379, 139
499:
500: \bibitem[]{} Wiklind, T.~\& Alloin, D., 2002, in Lecture Notes Phys. 608,
501: 124
502:
503: \bibitem[Winn et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...575..103W} Winn, J.~N., Kochanek,
504: C.~S., McLeod, B.~A., Falco, E.~E., Impey, C.~D., \& Rix, H.\ 2002, \apj,
505: 575, 103
506:
507:
508: \end{thebibliography}
509:
510: \clearpage
511:
512: \end{document}