1: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\slugcomment{Submitted to the APJ Letters}
5:
6: \shorttitle{Spectroscopy of SN 2002ic}
7:
8: \shortauthors{Deng et al.}
9:
10: %\received{2003 November 26}
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{Subaru Spectroscopy of the Interacting Type Ia Supernova SN
14: 2002ic: Evidence of a Hydrogen-rich, Asymmetric Circumstellar
15: Medium}
16:
17: \author{J.~Deng\altaffilmark{1,2},
18: K.~S.~Kawabata\altaffilmark{3,4},
19: Y.~Ohyama\altaffilmark{5},
20: K.~Nomoto\altaffilmark{1,2},
21: P.~A.~Mazzali\altaffilmark{1,2,6},
22: L.~Wang\altaffilmark{7},
23: D.~J.~Jeffery\altaffilmark{8},
24: M.~Iye\altaffilmark{4,9},
25: H.~Tomita\altaffilmark{2},
26: and
27: Y.~Yoshii\altaffilmark{1,10}
28: }
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Research Center for the Early Universe,
31: University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033,
32: Japan; deng@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo,
35: Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima
38: University, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan.}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{4}{Optical and Infrared Astronomy Division, National
41: Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Ohsawa, Mitaka, Tokyo
42: 181-8588, Japan.}
43:
44: \altaffiltext{5}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical
45: Observatory of Japan, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.}
46:
47: \altaffiltext{6}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico, Via Tiepolo, 11,
48: 34131 Trieste, Italy.}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{7}{Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1
51: Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720.}
52:
53: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics, University of Nevada at
54: Las Vegas, Box 454002, Las Vegas, NV 89154.}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate University
57: for Advanced Studies, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{10}{Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo,
60: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.}
61:
62: \begin{abstract}
63:
64: Optical spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova SN 2002ic obtained
65: on 2003 June 27.6~UT, i.e., $\sim$ 222 rest-frame days after
66: explosion, is presented. Strong H emission indicates an
67: interaction between the expanding SN ejecta and an H-rich
68: circumstellar medium (CSM). The spectrum of SN~2002ic resembles
69: those of SNe 1997cy and 1999E. The three SNe also have similar
70: luminosities, suggesting that they are the same phenomenon and
71: that the CSM is also similar. We propose a new classification,
72: Type IIa SNe, for these events. The observed line profiles and
73: line ratios are measured and discussed within the ejecta-CSM
74: interaction scenario. The emission in H Balmer, [\ion{O}{3}], and
75: \ion{He}{1} lines, and in permitted \ion{Fe}{2} blends, resembles
76: the spectra of the Type IIn SN 1987F and of Seyfert 1 galaxies. A
77: high-density, clumpy CSM is inferred. Strong, very broad
78: [\ion{Ca}{2}]/\ion{Ca}{2} and [\ion{O}{1}]/\ion{O}{1} emissions
79: imply that not all the outer SN ejecta were decelerated in the
80: interaction, suggesting that the CSM is aspherical.
81:
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: \keywords{supernovae: general --- supernovae: individual
85: (SN~2002ic)}
86:
87:
88: \section{INTRODUCTION}
89:
90: \citet{ham03} reported strong \ion{Fe}{3}, \ion{Si}{2}, and
91: \ion{S}{2} features in the early-time spectra of SN~2002ic and
92: classified it as a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia). However, strong
93: H$\alpha$ emission was also observed. The detection of H$\alpha$
94: is unprecedented in an SN Ia. (For reviews on SN spectra, see
95: \citealt{fil97}). The emission was broad (FWHM $> 1000$
96: km~s$^{-1}$), suggesting that it was intrinsic to the SN.
97: \citet{ham03} suggested that it arose from the interaction between
98: the SN ejecta and a dense, H-rich circumstellar medium (CSM), as
99: in SNe IIn (e.g., \citealt{chu91,che94}). If this interpretation
100: is correct, SN~2002ic may be the first SN Ia to show direct
101: evidence of the circumstellar (CS) gas ejected by the progenitor
102: system, presenting a unique opportunity to explore the CSM around
103: an SN Ia and the nature of the progenitor system.
104:
105: In this Letter, we present optical spectroscopy of SN~2002ic
106: obtained more than 200 days after explosion, and discuss it within
107: the context of the ejecta-CSM interaction.
108:
109:
110: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS}
111:
112: Observations were carried out on 2003 June 27.6~UT with the Faint
113: Object Camera and Spectrograph (\citealt{kas02}) attached to the
114: Cassegrain focus of the 8.2 m Subaru Telescope. For the red
115: observation (5900 -- 10200 \AA), we used a 300 groove mm$^{-1}$
116: grism (centered at 7500 \AA) and an order-cut filter O58. For the
117: blue observation (3800 -- 7000 \AA), we used another 300 grooves
118: mm$^{-1}$ grism (centered at 5500 \AA) and no filter. A $0\farcs
119: 8$ width slit was used under moderate seeing conditions (FWHM
120: $\simeq 0\farcs 6-0\farcs 7$), resulting in a spectral resolution
121: $\lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 650$ ($\sim 460$ km~s$^{-1}$). The
122: total exposure time was 1680 s for each observation. The flux was
123: calibrated using observations of BD+28$\arcdeg$4211 \citep{mas90}.
124: A systematic error of $\sim$ 0.1 mag is caused by the insufficient
125: width of the slit compared with the seeing size. Although all data
126: were taken in polarimetric mode, the signal-to-noise ratio is not
127: high enough for sufficiently accurate polarimetry ($\lesssim 0.2$
128: \%). Therefore, in the following only the flux data are discussed.
129:
130: The spectrum is shown in Figure \ref{fig1}, after correction for
131: redshift ($z=0.0666$; \citealt{ham03}) and Galactic extinction
132: ($E_{B-V}=0.06$; \citealt{sch98}). The epoch is $\sim 222$
133: rest-frame days after explosion, which we assume occurred on 2002
134: November 3 UT \citep{ham03}. The spectrum has a brightness of
135: $m_V\sim 19.0$. In other words, the SN is only $\sim 1.5$ mag
136: fainter than at maximum light \citep{ham03}, while a normal SN Ia
137: at similar epochs would have faded by $\sim$ 5 mag with respect to
138: maximum light (Figure \ref{fig2}).
139:
140: %\begin{figure}
141: % \centering
142: % \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f1.eps}
143: % \caption{Spectra of SNe~2002ic ({\em thick lines}; $\sim
144: % 222$ d), 1997cy ({\em thin lines}; \citealt{tur00}), and
145: % 1999E ({\em dashed line}; \citealt{rig03}). \label{fig1}}
146: %\end{figure}
147:
148: The spectrum is strikingly similar to those of the peculiar
149: SNe~1997cy \citep{tur00} and 1999E \citep{rig03}, which were
150: classified as Type IIn. (See also \citealt{wan04}.) SN~2002ic
151: would also have been so classified, had it not been discovered at
152: an early epoch when it appeared to be a genuine SN Ia.
153: \cite{ham03} also noticed similarities to SN~1997cy in an earlier
154: spectrum ($\sim$ 71 days after explosion).
155:
156: The $UBVRI$ light curves (LCs) of the three SNe are also similar
157: (Figure \ref{fig2}). To construct the LC of SN~2002ic, we first
158: integrated the Subaru spectrum. This yielded $L = (5.8\pm
159: 0.6)\times 10^{42}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$, assuming a distance of 307 Mpc.
160: %($H_0$ = 65 km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$).
161: The bolometric correction thus estimated was used to convert $m_V$
162: at earlier phases in \citet{ham03} and the late-time MAGNUM
163: telescope \citep{yos02} photometry into rough bolometric
164: luminosities.
165:
166: %\begin{figure}
167: % \centering
168: % \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f2.eps}
169: % \caption{Comparison of the $UBVRI$ LC of SN~2002ic with
170: % those of SNe~1997cy \citep{tur00}, 1999E \citep{rig03}, and the
171: % normal SN Ia 1994D \citep{con00}. \label{fig2}}
172: %\end{figure}
173:
174:
175: \section{SPECTRAL ANALYSIS}
176:
177: The H$\alpha$ profile was decomposed using three Gaussians (Figure
178: \ref{fig3}, {\em top left}). (We used Gaussians for mathematical
179: convenience, although real component profiles can be different.) A
180: narrow core (FWHM $\sim 1000$ km~s$^{-1}$) is unresolved owing to
181: low instrumental resolution. The intermediate component has FWHM
182: $\sim 4800$ km~s$^{-1}$. It may develop from the $\sim 1800$
183: km~s$^{-1}$ component seen at earlier phases \citep{ham03}. The
184: broad blue wing centered at $\sim 6350$~\AA\ is likely
185: [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda\lambda$6300,6364 (FWHM $\sim 26000$
186: km~s$^{-1}$). The integrated fluxes are $4\times 10^{-15}$,
187: $1.5\times 10^{-14}$, and $3.2\times 10^{-14}$
188: ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$, respectively.
189:
190: Broad [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda\lambda$6300, 6364 is also present in
191: SNe~1997cy and 1999E. [\ion{O}{1}] lines seen in a few SNe IIn
192: (e.g., \citealt{fra02}) are narrower than 4000 km~s$^{-1}$ and
193: much weaker. [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$5577 is not obvious. Its
194: potential location, marked by an arrow in Figure \ref{fig1}, is
195: well in the smoothly declining part of the $\sim$ 5100 -- 5600
196: \AA\ feature.
197:
198: The H$\beta$ $\lambda$4861 -- [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$5007 complex
199: was decomposed with four Gaussians (Figure \ref{fig3}, {\em top
200: right}). The two H$\beta$ components have FWHM $\sim$ 1700 and
201: 4000 km~s$^{-1}$ and flux of $\sim 8\times 10^{-16}$ and $9\times
202: 10^{-16}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The unresolved
203: [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$5007 component (FWHM $\sim 500$ km~s$^{-1}$)
204: has a flux of $\sim 1.4\times 10^{-16}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.
205: The expected intensity of [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$4959 is only
206: one-third that of $\lambda$5007 \citep{ost89}. So the $\sim$4950
207: \AA\ feature (FWHM $\sim 6000$ km~s$^{-1}$) is mainly due to
208: \ion{Fe}{2} multiplet 42.
209:
210: Our spectrum shows a possible [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$4363 line
211: (Figure \ref{fig3}, {\em bottom right}), as in SNe~1997cy and
212: 1999E. A tentative Gaussian fit gives FWHM $\sim 1200$ km~s$^{-1}$
213: and a flux of $\sim 1.7\times 10^{-16}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$,
214: which are likely overestimates. The feature to the left is also
215: unresolved: it seems not to be H$\gamma$ $\lambda$4340; the
216: SN~1999E spectrum ({\em open circles}) does not show H$\gamma$.
217:
218: We decomposed the 7300 \AA\ feature into \ion{He}{1}
219: $\lambda$7065, [\ion{Ca}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$7291,
220: 7324/[\ion{O}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$7320, 7330, and \ion{O}{1}
221: $\lambda$7774 (Figure \ref{fig3}, {\em bottom left}). The FWHMs
222: are $\sim$ 3000, 18,000, and 10,000 km~s$^{-1}$, and the fluxes
223: are $\sim 6\times 10^{-16}$, $1.2\times 10^{-14}$, and $2.3\times
224: 10^{-15}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$, respectively. \ion{He}{1}
225: $\lambda$5876 is weak (FWHM $\sim 1400$ km~s$^{-1}$, flux $\sim
226: 2\times 10^{-16}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$), as in SN 1997cy.
227:
228: The strong emission near 8500~\AA\ is a blend of the \ion{Ca}{2}
229: IR triplet and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 (FWHM $\sim 13000$
230: km~s$^{-1}$ and flux $\sim 4.7\times 10^{-14}$
231: ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$). A broad feature to the red could be weak
232: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$9265. The \ion{Ca}{2} H and K flux is $\sim
233: 1\times 10^{-14}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.
234:
235: %\begin{figure}
236: % \centering
237: % \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f3.eps}
238: % \caption{Gaussian decomposition of line profiles. Solid
239: % squares show the observed profiles, thin lines are the Gaussian
240: % components, and thick lines are the combined Gaussian profiles.
241: % Open circles show [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$4363 in SN~1999E.
242: % \label{fig3}}
243: %\end{figure}
244:
245:
246: The lines we have identified can be divided into two groups based
247: on their width. One group, comprising the H Balmer, [\ion{O}{3}],
248: and \ion{He}{1} lines, have unresolved cores (FWHM $\lesssim 1000$
249: km~s$^{-1}$) and, in the case of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$,
250: components of intermediate width (FWHM $\sim 3000 - 5000$
251: km~s$^{-1}$). The other group includes broad
252: [\ion{Ca}{2}]/\ion{Ca}{2} and [\ion{O}{1}]/\ion{O}{1} lines (FWHM
253: $>10000$ km~s$^{-1}$). These lines do not show a narrow component.
254:
255: We believe the unresolved components are CSM emissions, likely
256: from a progenitor wind, as in SNe IIn (e.g., \citealt{fra02}). R.
257: Kotak \& W. P. S. Meikle (2004, in preparation), using
258: high-resolution spectroscopy, saw a P Cygni line with absorption
259: velocity $\sim 100$ km~s$^{-1}$ atop the H$\alpha$ core.
260: \citet{rig03} measured a similar P Cygni velocity for H$\alpha$
261: ($\sim 200$ km~s$^{-1}$) in SN~1999E. The intermediate components
262: of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ may be formed by multiple Thomson
263: scattering of narrow emissions in CSM clouds of $n\gtrsim 10^8$
264: cm$^{-3}$ \citep{wan04}. The [\ion{O}{3}]-emitting region may have
265: $n\sim 10^7$ cm$^{-3}$ ($T\sim 10^4$ K), near the critical density
266: of the [\ion{O}{3}] $2p^{2}~^{1}S$ level, as implied by the
267: comparable flux of the possible [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$4363 line
268: \citep{ost89}.
269:
270: The total H$\alpha$ luminosity, $L({\rm H_\alpha})\sim 2-3\times
271: 10^{41}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$, may imply $\sim 0.4-3 M_\sun$ of
272: high-density ionized H ($\sim 10^8-10^9$ cm$^{-3}$) in the CSM,
273: assuming case B recombination (see also \citealt{wan04}). Our
274: Balmer decrement [$L({\rm H_\alpha})/L({\rm H_\beta})\sim 10$] is
275: much steeper than expected for case B. Either collisional
276: processes are important or other Balmer photons are absorbed and
277: cascaded into H$\alpha$, or both. In either case, a high density
278: is implied.
279:
280: We suggest that the broad O/Ca lines are emitted by the SN Ia
281: ejecta. In the W7 model for SNe Ia \citep{nom84}, the outer C/O
282: layer has $v > 12000$ km~s$^{-1}$ and a typical density of $\sim
283: 10^5$ cm$^{-3}$ around 200 days, assuming free expansion. This is
284: consistent with the detection of [\ion{O}{1}]
285: $\lambda\lambda$6300, 6364 but not of [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$5577,
286: which suggests $n<10^8/t$(days) cm$^{-3}$ if $T\sim 10^4$ K (see
287: Figure 7 in \citealt{lei91}). The weakness of the [\ion{Ca}{2}]
288: $\sim$ 7300~\AA\ line with respect to the IR triplet may suggest
289: that the density is not as low. However, the flux ratio
290: $F_{7300}/F_{8500}$ in SN~1997cy actually decreases with time and
291: density. Perhaps the $\sim$ 8500~\AA\ feature is dominated by
292: Ly$\beta$-pumped \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$8446 at later phases.
293:
294: Parts of the outer ejecta must avoid strong CS interaction to
295: retain high velocities and produce the broad O and Ca emissions (
296: powered by X-ray/UV radiation from the interaction region). The
297: velocity of the shocked region and the preshocked ejecta is too
298: low to explain the width of these lines. According to
299: hydrodynamical simulations (T. Suzuki et~al. 2004, in
300: preparation), the pre-shocked ejecta have velocities less than
301: 7000 km~s$^{-1}$ at $\sim 100$ days after explosion and less than
302: 4000 km~s$^{-1}$ at $\sim 200$ days, and the shocked ejecta are
303: decelerated to similar velocities. We suggest that the CSM is
304: concentrated near the equator, so that the ejecta near the pole do
305: not strongly interact with it (see also Section~\ref{sec-disc}).
306:
307: We suggest that the features near 4300, 4600, 4950, and 5300 \AA\
308: (marked by circles and one arrow in Figure \ref{fig4}) are broad
309: blends of \ion{Fe}{2} multiplets 27; 38 and 37; 42; and 49, 48,
310: and 42, respectively. They strikingly resemble the \ion{Fe}{2}
311: permitted emissions in Seyfert 1 galaxies (\citealt{ost89}; see
312: also \citealt{fil89} for similar conclusions in SN IIn 1987F).
313: They may come from the cool shell in the reverse shocked region
314: or, more likely, from the dense CSM clouds, suggesting a density
315: $\gtrsim 10^9$ cm$^{-3}$.
316:
317:
318: \section{SPECTRAL COMPARISON WITH OTHER TYPES} \label{sec-comp}
319:
320: %\begin{figure}
321: % \centering
322: % \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f4.eps}
323: % \caption{Spectra of SN~2002ic ({\em thick lines}; $\sim
324: % 222$ d) and SNe Ia 2000cx ({\em top}; \citealt{li01}), Ic 1998bw
325: % ({\em middle}; \citealt{pat01}), and IIn 1988Z ({\em bottom};
326: % \citealt{tur93}). \label{fig4}}
327: %\end{figure}
328:
329: In Figure \ref{fig4}, we compare the late-time spectra of
330: SNe~2002ic, 2000cx (Ia), 1998bw (Ic), and 1988Z (IIn). Strong
331: [\ion{Fe}{3}]/[\ion{Fe}{2}] blends dominate the normal SNe Ia
332: spectra (e.g., \citealt{liu97}) and this suggests low density and
333: high ionization relative to SN 2002ic where we find permitted Fe
334: II lines. SNe Ic show very strong \ion{Mg}{1}] $\lambda$4571
335: \citep{maz01}. This line could blend with the \ion{Fe}{2} feature
336: near 4400 -- 4700 \AA\ in SN~2002ic, but SNe 1997cy and 1999E
337: disfavor a strong \ion{Mg}{1}] contribution since in their spectra
338: the central wavelength is $\sim$ 4640 \AA.
339:
340: The spectrum of the SN IIn 1988Z also looks different from that of
341: SN~2002ic, although both show strong H$\alpha$ emission. In
342: SN~1988Z, broad [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda\lambda$6300, 6364 and
343: [\ion{Ca}{2}] $\lambda\lambda$7291, 7324 are absent, as in other
344: SNe IIn \citep{fil97}, while \ion{Ca}{2} IR/\ion{O}{1} emission is
345: weak. The broad Fe features near 4600 and 5300 \AA\ are also
346: absent in SN~1988Z.
347:
348:
349: \section{DISCUSSION} \label{sec-disc}
350:
351: The currently preferred model for SNe Ia is the thermonuclear
352: explosion of a C+O white dwarf (WD) in a binary system, reaching
353: the Chandrasekhar limit via either accretion from a normal
354: companion (the SD scenario, which is generally favored) or merging
355: with another WD (the DD scenario). (For recent reviews, see
356: \citealt{nom00,liv00}.)
357:
358: The SD scenario predicts the presence of an H/He-rich CSM. The
359: discovery of strong CSM interaction in SN~2002ic may prove that
360: this scenario does exist in nature. SNe~1997cy and 1999E may also
361: be CS-interacting SNe Ia. However, such events are rare. Solid
362: observational evidence of CSM has not yet been found in other SNe
363: Ia \citep{lun03}.
364:
365: Our spectral analysis suggests a high-density \ion{H}{1}-emitting
366: CSM ($n \sim 10^8-10^9$~cm$^{-3}$); so this is probably clumpy.
367: Assuming the CSM was formed in a progenitor wind, we relate the
368: mass-loss rate $\dot{M}$ and the wind velocity $u$ to the
369: H$\alpha$ luminosity, through $L({\rm H_\alpha})\sim 1-5\times
370: 10^{39}$ $(\dot{M}/10^{-2}{\rm~M_\sun~yr^{-1}})^2$ $(u/100
371: {\rm~km~s^{-1}})^{-2}$ $r_{16}^{-1} f^{-1}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$, where
372: $r_{16}$ is the radius of the CSM shock in units of $10^{16}$ cm
373: and $f$ is the CSM filling factor. For $u\sim 100$ km s$^{-1}$ and
374: $f\sim 0.01$, $\dot{M}$ can be as high as $\sim 10^{-2}$
375: M$_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$. The case B emissivity used here may
376: underestimate $L({\rm H_\alpha})$ by $\sim 50\%$, considering that
377: most H$\beta$ photons may have cascaded to H$\alpha$.
378:
379: We have identified high-velocity lines (FWHM $\gtrsim 10^4$
380: km$^{-1}$) emitted in the ejecta of SN~2002ic. Based on the
381: hydrodynamical model of T. Suzuki et~al. (2004, in preparation),
382: we suggest an equatorially concentrated structure for the CSM to
383: explain the coexistence of these lines with the strong CS
384: interaction. Such a geometry is not unexpected for the mass loss
385: from a binary system or for stars approaching the end of the
386: asymptotic giant branch (AGB). A preexisting clumpy disk was also
387: suggested by \citet{wan04}, based on spectropolarimetry.
388:
389: Is $\dot{M}\sim 10^{-2}$ M$_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$ too high for the SD
390: scenario? The highest $\dot{M}$ observed in AGB stars is between
391: $10^{-3}$ and $10^{-4}$ M$_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{ibe95};
392: $\dot{M}$ in our estimate is scaled as $u$. The bulk of the CSM
393: may be near the equator and at low velocity ($\sim 10$
394: km~s$^{-1}$), which cannot be resolved. The observed H$\alpha$ P
395: Cygni, dominated by the emission component, could be produced by
396: some high-velocity CSM ($\gtrsim 100$ km~s$^{-1}$) along the pole,
397: which should be close to our line of sight. Similar wind patterns
398: have been observed in some symbiotic stars (e.g.,
399: \citealt{sol85}), which have been suggested as candidates for SN
400: Ia progenitors.
401:
402: Further observations and modeling are required to understand the
403: nature of the CSM giving rise to this type of event, which may be
404: classified as ``Type IIa.'' Suggestions include a common envelope
405: \citep{liv03}, WD accretion wind \citep{hac99}, and the superwind
406: from an AGB star exploding
407: as a ``type 1.5'' event \citep{ham03}.
408:
409: \acknowledgments
410:
411: We thank the Subaru Telescope staff for their kind support, R.
412: Kotak and P. Meikle for allowing us to cite their results, and M.
413: Turatto for data of SNe~1997cy and 1999E.
414:
415:
416: \begin{thebibliography}{}
417:
418: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Fransson(1994)]{che94} Chevalier, R. A., \&
419: Fransson, C. 1994, \apj, 420, 268
420:
421: \bibitem[Chugai(1991)]{chu91} Chugai, N. N. 1991, \mnras, 250, 513
422:
423: \bibitem[Contardo, Leibundgut \& Vacca (2000)]{con00} Contardo, G.,
424: Leibundgut, B., \& Vacca, W. D. 2000, \aap, 259, 876
425:
426: \bibitem[Filippenko(1989)]{fil89} Filippenko, A. V. 1989, \aj, 97,
427: 726
428:
429: \bibitem[Filippenko(1997)]{fil97} Filippenko, A. V. 1997, \araa, 35, 309
430:
431: \bibitem[Fransson et~al.(2002)]{fra02} Fransson, C., et~al. 2002,
432: \apj, 572, 350
433:
434: \bibitem[Hachisu et~al.(1999)]{hac99} Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Nomoto,
435: K. 1999, \apj, 522, 487
436:
437: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(2003)]{ham03} Hamuy, M., et~al. 2003,
438: \nat, 424, 651
439:
440: \bibitem[Iben(1995)]{ibe95} Iben, I. Jr. 1995, \physrep, 250, 1
441:
442: \bibitem[Kashikawa et~al.(2002)]{kas02} Kashikawa, N., et~al. 2002,
443: \pasj, 54, 819
444:
445: \bibitem[Leibundgut et al.(1991)]{lei91} Leibundgut, B., et~al. 1991, \apj, 372, 531
446:
447: \bibitem[Li et~al.(2001)]{li01} Li, W. D., et~al. 2001, \pasp, 113, 1178
448:
449: \bibitem[Liu, Jeffery \& Schultz(1997)]{liu97} Liu, W., Jeffery,
450: D. J., \& Schultz, D. R. 1997, \apj, 483, L107
451:
452: \bibitem[Livio(2000)]{liv00} Livio, M. 2000, in
453: Type Ia Supernovae: Theory and Cosmology, ed. J. Niemeyer, \& J.
454: Truran (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 33
455:
456: \bibitem[Livio \& Riess(2003)]{liv03} Livio, M., \& Riess, A. G.
457: 2003, \apj, 594, L93
458:
459: \bibitem[Lundqvist et al.(2003)]{lun03} Lundqvist, P., et~al.
460: 2003, in IAU Colloquium 192, Supernovae, ed. J. M. Marcaide, \& K.
461: W. Weiler, (Berlin: Springer), in press (astro-ph/0309006)
462:
463: \bibitem[Massey and Gronwall(1990)]{mas90} Massey, P., and
464: Gronwall, C. 1990, \apj, 358, 344
465:
466: \bibitem[Mazzali et~al.(2001)]{maz01} Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K.,
467: Patat, F., \& Maeda, K. 2001, \apj, 559, 1047
468:
469: \bibitem[Nomoto, Thielemann, \& Yokoi(1984)]{nom84} Nomoto, K.,
470: Thielemann, F.-K., \& Yokoi, K. 1984, \apj, 268, 644
471:
472: \bibitem[Nomoto et~al.(2000)]{nom00} Nomoto, K., et~al. 2000, in
473: Type Ia Supernovae: Theory and Cosmology, ed. J. Niemeyer, \& J.
474: Truran (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 63
475:
476: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{ost89} Osterbrock, D. E. 1989,
477: Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei,
478: (Sausalito: University Science Books)
479:
480: \bibitem[Patat et~al.(2001)]{pat01} Patat, F., et~al. 2001, \apj, 555, 900
481:
482: \bibitem[Rigon et~al.(2003)]{rig03} Rigon, L., et~al. 2003,
483: \mnras, 340, 191
484:
485: \bibitem[Schlegel et~al.(1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D. J.,
486: Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
487:
488: \bibitem[Solf \& Ulrich(1985)]{sol85} Solf, J., \& Ulrich, H.
489: 1985, \aap, 148, 274
490:
491: \bibitem[Turatto et~al.(1993)]{tur93} Turatto, M., et~al.
492: 1993, \mnras, 262, 128
493:
494: \bibitem[Turatto et~al.(2000)]{tur00} Turatto, M., et~al. 2000,
495: \apj, 534, L57
496:
497: \bibitem[Yoshii(2002)]{yos02} Yoshii, Y. 2002, in New Trends in
498: Theoretical and Observational Cosmology, ed. Sato \& T. Shiromizu
499: (Tokyo: Univ. Acad. Press), 235
500:
501: \bibitem[Wang et~al.(2004)]{wan04} Wang, L., Baade, D., H\"{o}flich, P.,
502: Wheeler, J. C., Kawabata, K., \& Nomoto, K. 2004, ApJ, 604, L53
503:
504: \end{thebibliography}
505:
506: %%\end{document}
507:
508: \clearpage
509:
510: \figcaption[f1.eps]{Spectra of SNe~2002ic ({\em thick lines};
511: $\sim 222$ d), 1997cy ({\em thin lines}; \citealt{tur00}), and
512: 1999E ({\em dashed line}; \citealt{rig03}). \label{fig1}}
513:
514: \figcaption[f2.eps]{Comparison of the $UBVRI$ LC of SN~2002ic with
515: those of SNe~1997cy \citep{tur00}, 1999E \citep{rig03}, and the
516: normal SN Ia 1994D \citep{con00}. \label{fig2}}
517:
518: \figcaption[f3.eps]{Gaussian decomposition of line profiles. Solid
519: squares show the observed profiles, thin lines are the Gaussian
520: components, and thick lines are the combined Gaussian profiles.
521: Open circles show [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$4363 in SN~1999E.
522: \label{fig3}}
523:
524:
525: \figcaption[f4.eps]{Spectra of SN~2002ic ({\em thick lines}; $\sim
526: 222$ d) and SNe Ia 2000cx ({\em top}; \citealt{li01}), Ic 1998bw
527: ({\em middle}; \citealt{pat01}), and IIn 1988Z ({\em bottom};
528: \citealt{tur93}). \label{fig4}}
529:
530: \clearpage
531:
532: \epsscale{0.8}
533: \plotone{f1c.eps} \clearpage
534:
535: \plotone{f2c.eps} \clearpage
536:
537: \plotone{f3c.eps}
538:
539: \plotone{f4c.eps}
540:
541:
542: \end{document}
543: