1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
29: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
30: %% the \begin{document} command.
31: %%
32: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
33: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
34: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
35: %% for information.
36:
37: % \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
38:
39:
40: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
41:
42: % \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ Letters, October 2003}
43:
44: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
45: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
46: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
47: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
48: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
49: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
50:
51: \shorttitle{Spectroscopy of Molecular Hydrogen From KH~15D}
52: \shortauthors{Deming et al.}
53:
54: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
55: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
60: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
61: %% you desire.
62:
63: \title{Spectroscopy of Molecular Hydrogen Emission From KH~15D\altaffilmark{1}}
64: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
65: %% author and affiliation information.
66: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
67: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
68: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
69: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
70:
71: \altaffiltext{1}{Data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is
72: operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology,
73: the University of California and the National Aeronautics and Space
74: Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial
75: support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.}
76:
77:
78: \author{Drake Deming}
79: \affil{NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, \\
80: Planetary Systems Branch, Code 693, Greenbelt MD 20771}
81: \email{ddeming@pop600.gsfc.nasa.gov}
82:
83: \and
84:
85: \author{David Charbonneau}
86: \affil{California Institute of Technology, 105-24 (Astronomy),\\
87: 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125}
88: \email{dc@caltech.edu}
89:
90: \and
91:
92: \author{Joseph Harrington}
93: \affil{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University \\
94: 326 Space Sciences Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14853-6801}
95: \email{jh@oobleck.astro.cornell.edu}
96: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
97: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
98: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
99: %% affiliation.
100:
101: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
102: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
103: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
104: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
105: %% editorial office after submission.
106:
107: \begin{abstract}
108:
109: We report infrared spectroscopy of the unusual eclipsing pre-main
110: sequence object KH~15D, obtained using NIRSPEC on Keck II. During
111: eclipse, observations using low spectral resolution
112: ($\lambda/\delta\lambda \sim 1000$) reveal the presence of prominent
113: molecular hydrogen emission in 5 lines near $2~\mu$m. The relative
114: line strengths are consistent with thermal excitation at $T \sim 2800
115: \pm300K$. Observations out of eclipse, at both low and high spectral
116: resolution ($\lambda/\delta\lambda \sim 2 \times 10^{4}$), show
117: reduced contrast with the stellar continuum. The change in contrast
118: for the strongest line, 1-0~S(1), is consistent with an approximately
119: constant emission line superposed on a variable stellar continuum.
120: Emission in the 1-0~S(1) line is observed to extend by $\gtrsim 4$
121: arc-sec both east and west of the stellar point spread function
122: ($\gtrsim 3000$ AU). Observed at high spectral resolution, the
123: velocity and intensity structure of the 1-0~S(1) profile are both
124: asymmetric. East of the stellar PSF (by $1.1 - 2.3$ arc-sec) the
125: emission is blueshifted ($-63$ km sec$^{-1}$), and has significantly
126: greater intensity than the marginally redshifted component ($+2$ km
127: sec$^{-1}$, $\sim$ consistent with zero) which dominates west of the
128: stellar PSF. The spatial extent of the emission, and the excitation
129: temperature, suggest shock-excitation of ambient gas by a bipolar
130: outflow from the star and/or disk. However, it is difficult to
131: account for the observed radial velocity unless the outflow
132: axis is inclined significantly to the plane of the sky.
133: \end{abstract}
134:
135: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
136: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
137: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
138: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
139:
140:
141: \keywords{stars: pre-main sequence --- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks
142: --- planetary systems: formation}
143: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
144: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
145: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
146: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
147: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
148: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
149: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
150: %% each reference.
151:
152: \section{Introduction}
153:
154: KH~15D is a weak-lined T Tauri star (K7V) in NGC 2264 ($d=760$ pc),
155: which shows deep (3.5 mag) periodic eclipses, each lasting for about
156: 20 days, a large fraction of the 48.36 day period
157: \citep{her02,hh03}. The eclipses occur abruptly, indistinguishable
158: from obscuration by a `knife edge' \citep{her02}. During eclipse, the
159: lack of reddening in the spectrum \citep{ham01}, and polarization
160: which varies only weakly with wavelength \citep{agol03}, imply that
161: the obscuring matter must be comprised of large particles. A consensus
162: view to date is that the eclipses are caused by structure in a
163: protoplanetary disk, fortuitously edge-on to our line of
164: sight. Candidate structures include a density wave \citep{her02}, a
165: vortex \citep{bv03}, or a warp in the disk induced by planet-disk
166: interactions \citep{agol03,winn03}. The considerable recent interest
167: in KH~15D derives from the diagnostic potential inherent in the
168: eclipse geometry, and the serendipity of finding a protoplanetary
169: system whose structure suggests that planetary formation is actively
170: occurring.
171:
172: Although the eclipses in KH~15D are evidently caused by large solid
173: particles, observations of the gaseous component may help to deduce
174: the nature of the system. \citet{ham03} observed double-peaked atomic
175: hydrogen emission lines, indicative of a bipolar outflow. In this
176: {\it Letter} we report the spectroscopic discovery of $2~\mu$m
177: molecular hydrogen lines in emission, also showing a double-peaked
178: structure indicative of outflow. This H$_2$ emission has been
179: independently discovered by \citet{tok03}, by imaging in a narrow-band
180: filter. Molecular hydrogen emission is commonly observed from pre-main
181: sequence objects \citep{bach96}, where it can be excited by
182: fluorescence \citep{black87} or by shocks \citep{sb82}, and has been
183: well-studied in many cases. H$_2$ observations should therefore help
184: to relate KH~15D to other pre-main sequence systems.
185:
186: \section{Observations}
187:
188: We observed KH~15D using the NIRSPEC spectrometer on the Keck II
189: telescope \citep{mclean98}. Observations on 19 \& 26 August 2002 UT
190: used NIRSPEC's low spectral resolution mode, with slit widths of
191: $0.76$ and $0.57$ arc-sec respectively, giving
192: ${\lambda}/{\delta}{\lambda} \sim 1100$ and $\sim 2000$. KH~15D was
193: in eclipse on 19 August (phase $=0.17$, emergence was just beginning;
194: zero phase is center of eclipse), and out of eclipse on 26 August
195: (phase $=0.32$). Noise from the sky background was higher than usual
196: on both nights because the object was observed at high airmass
197: ($\sim 2$) in pre-dawn conditions, with a rapidly brightening
198: sky. (KH~15D observations were supplementary to our main program.)
199: Sky subtraction was facilitated by nodding the telescope to well
200: separated `a' and `b' positions along the slit. The position angle of
201: the slit (measured positive eastward from north), and total
202: integration time used, were $75^{\circ}$ \& $600$ seconds, and
203: $134^{\circ}$ \& $400$ seconds, on 19 \& 26 August, respectively.
204:
205: On 2 September 2002 UT, KH~15D was out of eclipse (phase$=0.46$). We
206: observed it using NIRSPEC's high-resolution cross-dispersed mode,
207: giving ${\lambda}/{\delta}{\lambda}~\sim~23,000$, with a $0.43$
208: arc-sec slit width (2 pixels), in position angle $66^{\circ}$. Total
209: integration time was $1600$ seconds. These high resolution
210: observations were made under better sky conditions (airmass
211: $\sim~1.7$), and also used nodding for sky subtraction. For both the
212: low and high resolution spectra, we observed a neon emission lamp for
213: wavelength calibration and a continuum lamp for flat-fielding.
214:
215: \section{Spectral Analysis}
216:
217: \subsection{Low Resolution Spectra}
218:
219: Sky and dark current subtraction was accomplished to first order by
220: subtracting the `b' frames from the `a' frames, after division by the
221: flat-field lamp frame. A second-order sky correction was accomplished
222: by subtracting a residual sky spectrum from the average difference
223: frame. The residual sky spectrum was determined on the average
224: difference frame by summing a region located spatially between the `a'
225: and `b' positions of the star on the slit. The KH~15D spectrum was
226: obtained in a standard extraction, by summing both the `a' and `b'
227: spectra over a region of $\pm 2$ arc-sec along the slit, after
228: correction for the tilt of the slit. The wavelength scale was
229: determined by fitting Gaussian profiles to 14 neon emission lines in
230: calibration spectra taken immediately following the KH~15D
231: spectra. The neon rest wavelengths (from the NIRSPEC manual) were
232: expressed as a quadratic function of the fitted line positions (in
233: pixels), with coefficients determined by least squares. The precision
234: of the wavelength calibration, estimated from the scatter in the
235: quadratic fits, is $\sim 0.0002~\mu$m (0.5 pixels). Figure~1 shows
236: the low-resolution spectra in and out of eclipse, with the wavelength
237: scale transformed to the stellar frame. Our velocity transformations
238: assume a heliocentric stellar radial velocity of $+10$ km~sec$^{-1}$,
239: intermediate between the two values cited by \citet{ham03}. Both
240: Figure~1 spectra have been flat-fielded, and normalized to a unit
241: intensity near $2.1~\mu$m. We did not observe a standard flux source,
242: but we were able to use the KH~15D stellar continuum to estimate an
243: absolute line intensity (see below).
244:
245: The low resolution spectrum during eclipse shows 5 emission lines due
246: to H$_2$, as noted on the Figure. Even the weakest of these lines,
247: 2-1~S(1), is real, which we judged by inspecting the average
248: difference frame prior to spectral extraction. On the difference
249: frame, emission in the strongest line, 1-0~S(1), has a spatial
250: distribution along the slit which is peaked at the stellar position to
251: within $0.2$ arc-sec (1 pixel). This bright emission can be traced beyond the
252: stellar point spread function (PSF) by at least $\pm 4$ arc-sec. There
253: is evidence for faint S(1) emission (intensity $\sim 0.2$ of the KH~15D peak) at
254: one other position along the slit, $\sim 16$ arc-sec distant from KH~15D.
255:
256: Intensities for the H$_2$ lines were determined by fitting Gaussian
257: profiles. The widths of the fitted Gaussians were all constrained to
258: equal the best-fit width for the 1-0~S(1) line, since the lines are
259: not spectrally resolved. Errors in the line intensities (areas under
260: the Gaussian fits) were estimated using a Monte-Carlo procedure: we
261: repeated the fits many times on `synthetic' lines having the same line
262: parameters and noise levels as in the real data. All of the line
263: intensities and errors are normalized to unit intensity for the
264: 1-0~S(1) line, and are tabulated in Table~1. We used the very high
265: spectral resolution atlas of \citet{liv91}, convolved to the $\sim 25$
266: km sec$^{-1}$ widths of the lines (see below), and measured the
267: telluric absorption at the Doppler-shifted position of each line. At
268: the observed geocentric Doppler shift and line width, none of the
269: KH~15D lines are coincident with significant telluric lines, hence any
270: telluric corrections are negligible, even at 2 airmasses.
271:
272: The weakness of the 2-1~S(1) line is indicative of thermal excitation,
273: since models of fluorescent emission predict an intensity for this
274: line of $\sim 0.5$ relative to the 1-0~S(1) line \citep{black87}. It
275: is clear from Figure~1 that the intensity of 2-1~S(1) is substantially
276: less than half of the 1-0~S(1) line. To determine the excitation
277: temperature, we computed ln$(I/gA)$ where $I$ is the Table~1 line
278: intensity, $g$ is the upper level statistical weight, and $A$ is the
279: Einstein A-value. For optically thin emission, ln$(I/gA)$ is
280: proportional to the energy of the emitting level, with constant of
281: proportionality $= -1/T$. We adopted the line parameters tabulated by
282: \citet{fernan97}, and calculated $T~\sim~2800\pm300K$ by
283: least squares. The relative intensities expected from thermal excitation at
284: $T=2800K$ are tabulated in Table~1 for comparison. The differences
285: between these values and the observed intensities are somewhat greater
286: than our estimated observational errors, but not so discrepant as to
287: contradict thermal excitation.
288:
289: \subsection{High Resolution Spectra}
290:
291: Figure~1 shows that the emission line contrast is greatly reduced out
292: of eclipse, similar to the effect seen in atomic emission lines by
293: \citet{ham03}. In the presence of shot noise from the stellar continuum,
294: observation of the emission lines outside of eclipse is problematic at
295: low spectral resolution. But the contrast for unresolved emission lines is
296: proportional to spectral resolution, and we have been able to measure
297: the 1-0~S(1) line in high resolution spectra outside of eclipse.
298:
299: Our high resolution spectra were extracted from an average difference
300: image in a manner similar to the low-resolution spectra. However, the
301: high-resolution spectra did not require a second order sky
302: subtraction, and we used night sky emission lines for wavelength
303: calibration. A velocity (wavelength) precision of $1.8$ km sec$^{-1}$
304: (0.4 pixels) was achieved by using four night sky lines, two on each
305: side of the 1-0~S(1) line, with vacuum wavelengths from \citet{rouss}.
306: We adopted the precise vacuum wavelength ($2.1218356~\mu$m) of the
307: 1-0~S(1) line from \cite{bbs82}. Similar to the low resolution
308: in-eclipse spectra, our high resolution spectra also show the emission
309: extending well beyond the stellar PSF by $\gtrsim 4$ arc-sec. We
310: extracted three high-resolution spectra from the average difference
311: frame, and these spectra are shown in Figure~2. The first spectrum
312: (upper portion of Figure~2) was extracted by summing along the slit
313: within $\pm 0.9$ arc-sec of the star. Two other spectra were
314: extracted over the interval $1.1-2.3$ arc-sec from the star to the
315: east and west (lower spectra in Figure~2).
316:
317: We examined the total intensity of the line seen in Figure~2 (top
318: spectrum, near the star), compared to the line intensity seen near the
319: star during eclipse. Using the stellar continuum as a reference, and
320: adopting an eclipse depth of 3.1 mag at the epoch of the Figure~1
321: spectrum (phase$=0.17$; \citet{her02}), we compute the intensity
322: expected in Figure~2 (out of eclipse) by scaling the Figure~1 (in
323: eclipse) line intensity. Since the emission is extended, we
324: allow for the different solid angles (slit widths times distance
325: summed along the slit). On this basis we expect to see a line
326: intensity about $25\%$ less than is actually observed in Figure~2.
327: This is certainly within the errors of the observations, and we
328: conclude that the 1-0~S(1) line intensity is approximately constant,
329: and is not eclipsed. The variation in H$_2$ emission line contrast
330: can be accounted for (within the errors) solely by changes in the
331: stellar brightness.
332:
333: The line profiles seen in Figure~2 show two components. Relative to
334: the reference frame of the star, a blueshifted component appears at
335: $-63$ km sec$^{-1}$, and a redshifted component at $+2$ km sec$^{-1}$.
336: Within the errors, the redshifted component is consistent with zero
337: velocity. Although the total intensity in the emission is peaked at
338: the stellar position, the relative intensity of the blue- and
339: redshifted components changes abruptly there. East of the star, the
340: blueshifted component dominates, whereas the redshifted component
341: prevails to the west. The components are relatively narrow, FWHM $\sim
342: 25$ km sec$^{-1}$.
343:
344: We have estimated the absolute line intensity for the Figure~2
345: spectrum coincident with the stellar position, adding both components.
346: Using the $V$ magnitude reported by \citet{ham01}, and the $V-K$ color
347: normal to a K7 dwarf from \citet{bessel}, we deduce a $K$ magnitude
348: for the star of 12.9, outside of eclipse. Adopting the zero-magnitude
349: flux from \citet{bessel}, we calculated the line intensity using the
350: stellar continuum as a photometric standard. Since the star is a
351: point source, whereas the emission is extended, we corrected for
352: stellar slit-losses. Fitting a Gaussian to the spatial profile of the
353: star (along the slit), we derive $0.8$ arc-sec seeing (FWHM). Assuming
354: image symmetry, a 2-D calculation indicates $21\%$ loss at the slit
355: ($0.43$ arc-sec slit width). We thereby derive a line intensity of
356: $\sim 1.4 \times 10^{-16}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ sec$^{-1}$. Following the
357: calculation outlined by \citet{bary03} for optically thin emission,
358: this implies a mass $\sim 10^{-10}~M_{\bigodot}$ of hot H$_2$, and a
359: column density of $\sim 6 \times 10^{14}$ molecules cm$^{-2}$. This is
360: comparable to the hot H$_2$ mass in the near vicinity of several
361: weak-lined T-Tauri stars cited by \citet{bary03}, except that we argue
362: for shock-heating by outflow in KH~15D, not UV fluorescence or heating
363: by X-ray flux. Note that the inferred mass is proportional to the
364: square of the source distance, and we have adopted $d=760$ pc. Note
365: also (see below) that \citet{tok03} have imaged an extended jet of
366: S(1) emission, and the mass we derive here applies only to the
367: immediate vicinity of the star (within $\pm 0.9 \times 0.43$
368: arc-sec$^{2}$).
369:
370: \section{Discussion}
371:
372: \citet{tok03} have imaged KH~15D in a narrow band filter centered on
373: the 1-0 S(1) line. They find a prominent jet starting in close
374: coincidence with the star, and extending many arc-sec to the north.
375: They have considered whether the jet is physically associated with
376: KH~15D or is a chance superposition (H$_2$ emission is common in
377: star-forming regions like NGC 2264). Independent of our spectroscopy,
378: they conclude that the association of the jet with KH~15D is probably
379: physical. We find that: 1) our low resolution spectrum during eclipse
380: shows bright S(1) emission centered on the stellar position to $\sim
381: 0.2$ arc-sec (Sec. 3.1), and 2) our high resolution spectrum resolves
382: the line into two velocity components, whose relative intensities
383: change aburptly at the stellar position (Sec 3.2). Therefore our
384: results strongly support the conclusion that S(1) emission is physically
385: associated with KH~15D.
386:
387: Recently, quiescent H$_2$ 1-0~S(1) emission has been detected near
388: several T-Tauri stars \citep{wein00, bary03}. This quiescent emission
389: shows narrow line profiles, just as we see in KH~15D. We considered
390: the possibility that the KH~15D emission originates from quiescent
391: gas, with Doppler shifts resulting from Keplerian orbital motion. We
392: cannot exclude that some fraction of the emission, especially in the
393: red component, arises from quiescent emission. Nevertheless, because
394: the KH~15D emission is spatially extended and shows evidence of
395: outflow, it seems more closely related to the shock-heated H$_2$ which
396: has been observed in hundreds of young stellar objects, including
397: classical T-Tauri stars \citep{bach96, her97}.
398:
399: Interpretation of our KH~15D observations requires knowing the stellar
400: radial velocity, and the heliocentric radial velocity we adopt for the
401: system ($+10$ km sec$^{-1}$) may be in error if the star is a binary.
402: Nevertheless, the double-peaked profiles we observe in the close
403: vicinity of the star suggest outflow. However, a simple picture of a
404: symmetric bipolar jet emergent normal to a single edge-on disk is hard
405: to reconcile with our observations, and with the \citet{tok03}
406: imaging. In such a simple interpretation, the line-of-sight shock
407: velocity in the 1-0 S(1) line would have to be at least half of the
408: difference between the red- and blueshifted components, i.e. $\gtrsim
409: 30$ km sec$^{-1}$. For a disk inclination of $\sim 84^{\circ}$
410: \citep{ham03}, the flow would be inclined by only $\sim 6^{\circ}$ to
411: the plane of the sky, so the total shock velocity would have to exceed
412: $\sim 250$ km sec$^{-1}$. This is well above the velocity where
413: shocked H$_2$ is observed in other objects (H$_2$ becomes dissociated
414: at high shock velocities, \citet{sb82}). Therefore the outflow
415: revealed in molecular hydrogen is likely to be inclined significantly to
416: the plane of the sky. Similar arguments would not apply to lines
417: formed very close to the star, where a bipolar outflow may not be
418: collimated. However, the emission we observe is spatially resolved
419: from the star, occurring at distances where bipolar outflows are often
420: highly collimated to a single axis.
421:
422: \citet{tok03} find only one bright jet of line emission extending to
423: the north. Since our slit was oriented primarily east-west (PA
424: $=66^{\circ}$), we have observed approximately (but not precisely)
425: perpendicular to the jet axis. Our spectra will reveal the flow
426: pattern in the jet to the extent that the total angle between our slit
427: and the velocity vector differs from ${\pi}/2$. We believe that our
428: brightest emission component (blueshifted `east' spectrum in Figure~2)
429: samples the \citet{tok03} jet, whereas the red components are
430: consistent with either a possible fainter counter-jet (not yet
431: detected by imaging), or quiescent emission near the stellar
432: velocity.
433:
434: The extent and complexity of H$_2$ emission from KH~15D is reminiscent
435: of T~Tauri itself, a known binary system. Consistent with its binary
436: nature, T~Tauri shows two nearly perpendicular outflow systems
437: \citep{her97}. Our observations are not yet sufficient, in terms of
438: spatial sampling, to say whether KH~15D shows a single, or multiple,
439: velocity systems. Mapping spectroscopy of KH~15D in the 1-0~S(1) line
440: is needed to clarify the kinematics of this interesting object.
441:
442: \section{Acknowledgements}
443:
444: We thank Tim Brown for help with the observations, and the Keck
445: support staff, particularly Randy Campbell and Grant Hill, for
446: assistance with NIRSPEC. We are grateful to Alan Tokunaga and
447: colleagues for communicating and discussing their imaging results, and
448: to an anonymous referee for several helpful comments. Portions of this
449: work were supported by NASA's Origins of Solar Systems program. The
450: authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant
451: cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always
452: had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate
453: to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
454:
455: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
456: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
457: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
458:
459: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
460: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
461: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
462:
463:
464:
465: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
466: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
467: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
468: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
469: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
470: %%
471: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
472: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
473: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
474: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
475: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
476: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
477: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
478: %% place of the \cite commands.
479:
480: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
481: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
482: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
483:
484: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
485: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
486: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
487: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
488: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
489:
490: \begin{thebibliography}{}
491: \bibitem[Agol et al.(2003)]{agol03} Agol, E., Barth, A. J., Wolf, S.,
492: \& Charbonneau, D. 2003, \apj, in press, astro-ph/0309309
493: \bibitem[Bachiller (1996)]{bach96} Bachiller, R. 1996, \araa, 34, 111
494: \bibitem[Barge \& Viton (2003)]{bv03} Barge, P., \& Viton, M. 2003, \apj, 593, L121
495: \bibitem[Bary et al.(2003)]{bary03} Bary, J. S., Weintraub, D. A., \& Kastner, J. H. 2003,
496: \apj, 586, 1136
497: \bibitem[Bessel \& Brett (1988)]{bessel} Bessel, M. S., \& Brett, J. M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134
498: % \bibitem[Beckwith et al.(1978)]{beck78} Beckwith, S., Gatley, I., Matthews, K.,
499: % \& Neugebauer, G. 1978, \apj, 223, L41
500: \bibitem[Black \& van Dishoeck (1987)]{black87} Black, J. H., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 1987,
501: \apj, 322, 412
502: \bibitem[Bragg et al.(1982)]{bbs82} Bragg, S. L., Brault, J. W., \& Smith, W. H. 1982,
503: \apj, 263, 999
504: % \bibitem[Davis (2002)]{davis02} Davis, C. J. 2000, RevMexAA (Serie de Conferencias), 13, 36
505: \bibitem[Fernandes et al.(1997)]{fernan97} Fernandes, A. J. L., Brand, P. W. J. L.,
506: \& Burton, M. G. 1997, MNRAS, 290, 216
507: \bibitem[Hamilton et al.(2001)]{ham01} Hamilton, C. M., Herbst, W., Shih, C.,
508: \& Ferro, A. J. 2001, \apj, 554, L201
509: \bibitem[Hamilton et al.(2003)]{ham03} Hamilton, C. M., Herbst, W., Mundt, R.,
510: Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., \& Johns-Krull, C. M. 2003, \apj, 591, L45
511: \bibitem[Herbst et al.(1997)]{her97} Herbst, T. M., Robberto, M. \& Beckwith, S. V. W. 1997,
512: \aj, 114, 744
513: \bibitem[Herbst et al.(2002)]{her02} Herbst, W., Hamilton, C. M., Vrba, F. J.,
514: Ibrahimov, M. A., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Mundt, R., Lamm, M., Mazeh, T.,
515: Webster, Z. T., Haisch, K. E., Williams, E. C., Rhodes, A. H.,
516: \& Balonek, T. J. 2002, PASP, 114, 1167
517: \bibitem[Herbst \& Hamilton (2003)]{hh03} Herbst, W., \& Hamilton, C. M.
518: 2003, in {\it Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets},
519: ASP Conference Series vol. 294 (D. Deming \& S. Seager, eds.), p. 231
520: % \bibitem[Hirth (1994)]{hirth94} Hirth, G. A. 1994, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Heidelberg
521: \bibitem[Livingston \& Wallace (1991)]{liv91} Livingston, W., and
522: Wallace, L. 1991, An Atlas of the Solar Spectrum in the Infrared from
523: 1850 to 9000 $cm^{-1}$ ($1.1$ to $5.4\ \mu$m), NSO Technical Report
524: 91-001, (Tucson: National Solar Observatory)
525: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mclean98} McLean, I. S., et al. Proc. SPIE, 3354, 566
526: \bibitem[Rousselot et al.(2000)]{rouss} Rousselot, P., Lidman, C., Cuby, J.-G.,
527: Moreels, G., \& Monnet, G. 2000, \aap, 354, 1134
528: \bibitem[Shull \& Beckwith (1982)]{sb82} Shull, M. J., \& Beckwith, S. 1982
529: \araa, 20, 163
530: \bibitem[Tokunaga et al.(2003)]{tok03} Tokunaga, A. T., Gaessler, W., Hayano, Y.,
531: Hayashi, M., Iye, M., Kanzawa, T., Kobayshi, N., Kamata, Y., Minowa, Y.,
532: Nedachi, K., Oya, S., Pyo, T., Saint-Jacques, D., Terada, H., Takami, H.,
533: \& Takato, N. 2003, private communication, and paper in preparation.
534: \bibitem[Weintraub et al.(2000)]{wein00} Weintraub, D. A., Kastner, J. H., \&
535: Bary, J. S. 2000, \apj, 541, 767
536: \bibitem[Winn et al.(2003)]{winn03} Winn, J. N., Garnavich, P. M., Stanek, K. Z.,
537: \& Sasselov, D. D. 2003, \apj, 593, L121
538: \end{thebibliography}
539:
540:
541: \clearpage
542:
543:
544: \begin{table}
545: \caption{Observed line intensities, normalized to 1-0 S(1), and
546: compared to the intensities expected from thermal excitation at
547: $T=2800K$}
548: \vspace{2mm}
549: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
550: \tableline
551: Line & Observed Intensity & Thermal Intensity ($T=2800K$) \\
552: \tableline
553: 1-0 S(1) & $1.0$ & $1.0$ \\
554: 1-0 S(0) & $0.30 \pm 0.04$ & $0.21$ \\
555: 2-1 S(1) & $0.24 \pm 0.05$ & $0.19$ \\
556: 1-0 Q(1) & $0.93 \pm 0.09$ & $0.71$ \\
557: 1-0 Q(3) & $0.94 \pm 0.11$ & $0.80$ \\
558: \tableline
559: \tableline
560: \end{tabular}
561: \end{table}
562: \clearpage
563: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
564: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
565:
566:
567: \begin{figure}
568: \epsscale{0.7}
569: \plotone{f1.ps}
570: % \plotfiddle{fig_1.ps}{3.0in}{0}{40}{40}{0}{0}
571: \vspace{1.0 cm}
572: \caption{Keck/NIRSPEC low spectral resolution observations of KH~15D
573: during eclipse (upper, 19 August 2002) and out of eclipse (lower, 26
574: August 2002). The lower spectrum has been offset downward by 1.0 for
575: clarity. Five emission lines due to molecular hydrogen are
576: identified, and are much more prominent relative to the stellar
577: continuum during eclipse. The absorption lines which are most apparent in
578: the lower spectrum are telluric. \label{fig1}}
579: \end{figure}
580:
581: \clearpage
582:
583:
584: \begin{figure}
585: \epsscale{0.7}
586: % \vspace{1.0in}
587: \plotone{f2.ps}
588: \caption{Keck/NIRSPEC high spectral resolution observations of KH~15D
589: out of eclipse, showing double-peaked emission in the 1-0~S(1)
590: line. The upper spectrum was produced by integrating along the slit (oriented
591: approximately east-west) by $\pm 0.9$ arc-sec from the star, so it
592: shows the emission superposed on the stellar continuum. The
593: absorption lines at $-450$ and $+370$ km sec$^{-1}$ are telluric. The
594: two bottom spectra are offset east and west from the stellar position,
595: both produced by integrating along the slit $1.1-2.3$ arc-sec from the star. (The
596: `west' spectrum has been offset downward by 0.3 for clarity.) The
597: wavelength and radial velocity scales have been transformed into the
598: rest frame of the star, where the dashed vertical line marks zero
599: velocity.
600: \label{fig2}}
601: \end{figure}
602:
603:
604:
605: \clearpage
606:
607:
608: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
609: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
610: %% User Guide for details.
611: %%
612: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
613: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
614: %% after every seventh one.
615:
616:
617: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
618: %% each one.
619:
620: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
621: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
622: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
623: %%
624:
625: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
626: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
627:
628:
629: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
630: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
631: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
632: %% inside the \tablecaption.
633:
634:
635: \end{document}
636:
637: %%
638: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
639: