1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: 

3: \newcommand{\degg}{\hbox{$^\circ$}}

4: \newcommand{\arcm}{\hbox{$^\prime$}}

5: \newcommand{\arcs}{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

6: \newcommand{\et}{et al.\ }

7: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}}

8: \newcommand{\Msun}{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace M_{\odot}$}}

9: \newcommand{\ls}{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}

10: \newcommand{\gs}{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}

11: \newcommand{\grb}{GRB~031203}

12: 

13: %\received{2003 December 23}

14: \begin{document}

15: 

16: \title{The discovery of an evolving dust scattered X-ray halo 

17: around \grb}

18: \shorttitle{An X-ray halo around \grb}

19: %\shortauthors{Vaughan \et}

20: \author{ S. Vaughan\altaffilmark{1}, 

21: R. Willingale\altaffilmark{1},

22: P. T. O'Brien\altaffilmark{1},

23: J. P. Osborne\altaffilmark{1}, 

24: J. N. Reeves\altaffilmark{2,3}, 

25: A. J. Levan\altaffilmark{1}, 

26: M. G. Watson\altaffilmark{1},

27: J. A. Tedds\altaffilmark{1}, 

28: D. Watson\altaffilmark{4},

29: M. Santos-Lle\'o\altaffilmark{5},

30: P. M. Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual\altaffilmark{5},

31: N. Schartel\altaffilmark{5}

32: } 

33: \email{sav2@star.le.ac.uk}

34: 

35: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of

36: Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.}

37: 

38: \altaffiltext{2}{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, Code 662,

39: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771,

40: USA.}

41: 

42: \altaffiltext{3}{Universities Space Research Association}

43: 

44: \altaffiltext{4}{Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy, Physics and

45: Geophysics, University of Copenhagen, Julian-Maries Vej 30, DK-2100,

46: Copenhagen \O, Denmark.}

47: 

48: \altaffiltext{5}{XMM-Newton SOC, Villafranca, Apartado 50727, E-28080

49: Madrid, Spain.}

50: 

51: \begin{abstract}

52: We report the first detection of a time-dependent, dust-scattered

53: X-ray halo around a gamma-ray burst. \grb\ was observed by {\it

54: XMM-Newton} starting six hours after the burst. The halo appeared as

55: concentric ring-like structures centered on the GRB location. The

56: radii of these structures increased with time as $t^{1/2}$, consistent

57: with small-angle X-ray scattering caused by a large column of dust

58: along the line of sight to a cosmologically distant GRB. The rings are

59: due to dust concentrated in two distinct slabs in the Galaxy located

60: at distances of $880$ and $1390$ pc, consistent with known Galactic

61: features. The halo brightness implies an initial soft X-ray pulse

62: consistent with the observed GRB. 

63: 

64: \end{abstract}

65: 

66: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts --- X-rays: general --- Galaxy:

67: structure --- ISM:dust}

68: 

69: \section{Introduction}

70: 

71: It has long been realized that the small-angle scattering of X-rays by

72: dust grains can result in a detectable X-ray ``halo'' around a distant

73: X-ray source (Overbeck 1965), with a radial intensity distribution

74: that depends on the dust properties and location. This phenomenon was

75: first detected by Rolf (1983) using data from {\it Einstein} and

76: confirmed by later observations (e.g. Mauche \& Gorenstein 1986;

77: Predehl \et 1991).

78: 

79: In the case of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), the transient nature of the

80: burst combined with the large initial X-ray flux means X-ray

81: scattering may be visible for a short period of time with a relatively

82: high surface brightness. As the transient flux passes through a dust

83: slab between the observer and the GRB, the scattering process

84: introduces a time-delay in which the X-rays at larger angles to the

85: line of sight arrive increasingly delayed with respect to the

86: non-scattered X-rays. Thus, the dust allows us to view the GRB X-ray

87: flux at earlier times. The time-dependent X-ray halo around the GRB

88: can, in principle, be used to provide detailed information on the

89: location, spatial distribution and properties of the dust and

90: the distance to and brightness of the GRB (e.g. Tr\"umper \&

91: Sch\"ofelder 1973; Klose 1994; Miralda-Escud\'e 1999; Draine 2003).

92: Images of transient X-ray sources seen in scattered light are

93: analogous to ``light echos'' seen around some supernovae (e.g. SN

94: 1987A, Xu, Crotts \& Kunkel 1995).

95: 

96: Scattered X-rays observed at an angle $\theta$ from the line-of-sight

97: to a GRB arrive after the direct emission with a time-delay $\tau_s$

98: given by:

99: 

100: \begin{equation}

101: \tau_s = \frac{(1+z_s) D_s D_g \theta^2 }{2 c D_{gs}},  

102: \end{equation}

103: 

104: where $z_s$ and $D_s$ are the redshift and angular diameter distance

105: of the scattering dust, $D_g$ is the angular diameter distance

106: of the GRB and $D_{gs}$ is the angular diameter distance from the dust

107: to the GRB (Miralda-Escud\'e 1999). 

108: 

109: Here we discuss the case of \grb\ observed by {\it XMM-Newton} on

110: two occasions shortly after the burst. The first observation revealed the

111: first dust-scattered X-ray halo detected around a GRB.

112: 

113: \section{Observations and data analysis}

114: 

115: \begin{figure*}[!t]

116: \centering

117: \epsscale{0.65}

118: \rotatebox{270}{

119: \plotone{f1.ps}

120: }

121: \caption{

122: Combined MOS images of \grb\ covering the $0.7-2.5$~keV range,

123: spanning $10\arcmin$ on a side. The data were divided into

124: $10$ contiguous time intervals lasting $5780$~s. The images were

125: obtained from the first six time slices are shown (smoothed

126: using a $6$~arcsec Gaussian kernel). The three

127: brightest point sources (S1, S2, S3) are marked.}

128: \vspace{-0.5 cm}

129: \end{figure*}

130: 

131: \grb\ was detected by the IBIS instrument on {\it Integral} on

132: 2003 December 3 at 22:01:28 UT as a single peaked burst with a

133: duration of 30 s and peak flux of $1.3 \times 10^{-7}$ erg s$^{-1}$

134: cm$^{-2}$ in the 20--200 keV band (Gotz \et 2003; Mereghetti \& Gotz

135: 2003). A 58 ks {\it XMM-Newton} observation of the field began at 2003

136: December 4, 04:09:29 UT. Several X-ray sources were detected within

137: the $2.5\arcmin$ radius {\it Integral} error-circle (Santos-Lle\'o \&

138: Calder\'on 2003), the brightest of which (S1) appeared to fade through

139: the observation (Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual \et 2003) and was interpreted

140: as the X-ray afterglow of \grb. We refined the astrometric

141: position of the afterglow by performing a cross-correlation with the

142: USNO-A2 catalog, the improved S1 position was (J2000) RA=$08^{\rm h}

143: 02^{\rm m} 30.19^{\rm s}$, Dec$=-39\degg$~$51$\arcmin~$04.0\arcsec$

144: ($1\sigma$ error 0.7\arcsec, Tedds et al. 2003).

145: 

146: The position in the Galactic plane ($l=255\degg, b=-4.6\degg$) results

147: in high optical extinction ($E(B-V) =1.0$, Schlegel, Finkbeiner \&

148: Davis 1998). Optical/IR observations failed to locate an afterglow.

149: Radio observations did locate a transient source location consistent

150: with the X-ray afterglow (Soderberg, Kulkarni \& Frail 2003), and

151: optical imaging and spectroscopy revealed a candidate host galaxy at

152: $z=0.105$ which shows star-forming features typical of GRB hosts

153: (Prochaska \et 2003a,b). Our refined location for the X-ray afterglow

154: is within 0.5\arcsec\ of the optical galaxy and consistent with the

155: position of the radio source. 

156: 

157: During the first {\it XMM-Newton} observation the GRB was observed on

158: axis with all EPIC instruments in full-frame modes (Str\"{u}der \et

159: 2001; Turner \et 2001). A second 54 ks {\it XMM-Newton} observation

160: was obtained on 2003 December 6 in which the GRB was $\approx

161: 6\arcmin$ off axis. The observational details and the GRB spectrum and

162: light-curve are discussed in detail in Watson \et (2004).

163: 

164: The extraction of science products followed standard procedures using

165: the {\it XMM-Newton} Science Analysis System ({\tt SAS v5.4.1}).  The

166: EPIC data were processed using the {\tt SAS} chains to produce

167: calibrated event lists and remove background flares. GRB afterglow

168: source counts were extracted from circular regions (radius

169: $34\arcsec$) and background counts were estimated from a large

170: off-axis region free from obvious point sources and the halo. The GRB

171: afterglow fades as $(t-t_0)^{-0.4}$, where $t_0$ is the time of the

172: GRB, which is unusually slow for GRB

173: X-ray afterglows.

174: 

175: \section{The X-ray Halo}

176: 

177: \begin{figure*}[!t]

178: \centering

179: \epsscale{0.65}

180: \rotatebox{270}{

181: \plotone{f2.ps}

182: }

183: \caption{

184: Radial profile of counts about the \grb\ afterglow from ten

185: contiguous time intervals (derived from the combined MOS

186: $0.7-2.5$~keV images). The afterglow itself (S1) and the

187: next two brightest points sources (S2, S3) were removed

188: prior to calculating the profiles (the positions of S2 and

189: S3 are marked in the upper panels).  The two peaks

190: corresponding to the two expanding rings are obvious. The

191: dotted lines denote the best-fitting $\theta \propto

192: (t-t_0)^{1/2}$ functions (see Fig.~3).}

193: \vspace{-0.5 cm}

194: \end{figure*}

195: 

196: The X-ray image from the first {\it XMM-Newton} observation reveals an

197: extended, circular halo concentric with the \grb\ afterglow (see

198: Fig.~1). This halo was seen in all three cameras of the EPIC

199: instrument, is unique to this observation, and is not due to scattered

200: optical or X-ray light within the instrument. Summing the entire

201: observation the halo had the form of a virtually complete ring

202: (Vaughan \et 2003), but splitting the observation into contiguous time

203: intervals revealed distinct rings which increased in radius

204: through the observation.

205: 

206: In order to better quantify this expansion, EPIC MOS images were

207: produced for ten contiguous time intervals of $5780$~s duration,

208: spanning the entire first observation, and binned to $4\arcsec$

209: pixels. We concentrate on the MOS data as the halo lies over several

210: chip gaps in the EPIC pn images, but the same halo was seen in both.

211: The radial profiles of the images about the afterglow were calculated

212: removing the three brightest point sources within the region of

213: interest (S1, S2 and S3 in Fig.~1) by ignoring all counts within

214: $40\arcsec$ from the centroid of each source. The radial profiles were

215: then background subtracted using the mean level from the

216: $350-400\arcsec$ annulus, which is well outside the detected halo. The

217: resulting count profiles as a function of radius are shown in Fig.~2.

218: The strongest peak moved outward from $\sim 120\arcsec$ to $\sim

219: 220\arcsec$ during the observation, while a second peak moved from

220: $\sim 160$ to $\sim 270\arcsec$.

221: 

222: The radial positions of the two rings were measured from the local

223: maxima of the two peaks in the radial distributions. Fig.~3 shows the

224: change in radii as a function of time, and both were well fit by a

225: simple power-law ($\theta \propto (t-t_0)^{\alpha}$). Fixing $t_0 =

226: 0$, the indices of the power-law expansions were measured to be

227: $\alpha=0.53\pm0.04$ and $0.51\pm0.05$ for the inner and outer rings

228: respectively (errors are 90\% confidence intervals), consistent with

229: the $\theta \propto (t-t_0)^{1/2}$ expansion predicted for a scattered

230: halo. As a consistency check we allowed $t_0$ to be a free parameter

231: but fixed $\alpha=0.5$ and refitted to derive limits of $t_0 =

232: 2794_{-3178}^{+2765}$~s and $2005_{-2867}^{+2512}$~s for the inner and

233: outer ring respectively, both consistent with $t_0 = 0$. The second

234: {\it XMM-Newton} observation obtained 3 days after the burst showed no

235: evidence for any ringed structure. 

236: 

237: The distance to the GRB is large (adopting the redshift of the

238: putative host galaxy), the time-delay is short and $\theta$ is

239: relatively large, thus to a good approximation $D_g = D_{gs}$ and

240: $(1+z_s) = 1$ in equation (1), hence $D_s = 2c \tau_s / \theta^2$.

241: Assuming $\theta \propto (t-t_0)^{1/2}$ and $t_0 = 0$, the data in

242: Fig.~3 imply that the scattering dust slabs are located at distances

243: from the observer of $D_1 = 1388\pm32$ pc and $D_2 = 882\pm20$ pc,

244: corresponding to the inner and outer ring respectively. At these

245: distances, the ring diameters probe size scales of 2--3 pc in the

246: dust scattering medium.

247: 

248: The halo spectrum was extracted from an annulus with radii

249: $110-220\arcsec$ using only the first half of the observation; the

250: decreased surface brightness of the halo at later times makes spectral

251: extraction unreliable. A background spectrum was extracted from a

252: large off-axis region (avoiding the halo and other point sources).

253: Fig.~4 shows the halo spectrum compared to the afterglow spectrum. The

254: spectrum of the halo is much steeper than that of the afterglow.

255: Fitting with a simple absorbed power-law yielded photon indices of

256: $\Gamma = 1.98\pm0.05$ and $\Gamma = 3.03\pm0.14$ for the afterglow

257: and halo, respectively. The best-fitting absorbing column was $N_{\rm

258: H} = 8.8 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ when fixed to be the same

259: for both afterglow and halo spectra. This is larger than the Galactic

260: value of $N_{\rm H} = 6.1 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ (Dickey \& Lockman

261: 1990). The specific fluxes at $t=36650$~s after the burst at $1$~keV

262: are $1.5_{-0.1}^{+0.2} \times 10^{-4}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$

263: keV$^{-1}$ for the afterglow and $6.0 \pm 0.4

264: \times 10^{-4}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ keV$^{-1}$ for the halo.

265: 

266: To model the dust scattering medium, we have simultaneously fitted the

267: ten radial profiles shown in Fig.~2 using the differential and total

268: scattering cross sections of the Rayleigh-Gans approximation (Mauche

269: and Gorenstein 1986). This is a valid approximation if the grain

270: radius in $\mu$m is much less than the X-ray photon energy in keV

271: (Smith \& Dwek 1998). We assume that the dust is confined to two slabs

272: at distances $D_{1}$ and $D_{2}$ with thickness $\Delta D$. The halo

273: seen is created by the combination of the soft X-ray pulse from the

274: GRB and the subsequent afterglow. The observed angular width of the

275: rings results from a combination of the duration of the soft X-ray

276: pulse, $\Delta t$, $\Delta D$ and the point spread function (PSF) of

277: the telescope. The width of the PSF corresponds to $\Delta

278: t\sim 1000$ s or $\Delta D\sim100$ pc. Given that the GRB is very

279: short, $\sim30$ s (Mereghetti \& Gotz 2003), we assume that $\Delta t

280: \ll 1000$ s and hence, allowing for the PSF,

281: the observed broadening of the rings, $20\arcsec$, gives us an

282: estimate of the slab thickness, $\Delta D=130\pm50$ pc.

283: 

284: The angular and temporal distribution was well fitted using grains

285: with radii in the range $0.15<a<0.25$ $\mu$m. Smaller grains scatter to

286: much larger angles (not visible because the time elapsed since the

287: burst is too small) and the upper limit to the grain size distribution

288: is expected to be $\approx 0.3$ $\mu$m (Predehl et al. 1991). Using

289: this range of grain sizes, we require the initial GRB pulse and

290: afterglow to have a photon index of $\Gamma \sim 2.0$ (as observed for

291: the afterglow from 6 h) to match the observed photon index of the halo

292: ($\Gamma = 3.0$).

293: 

294: \begin{figure}

295: \centering

296: \epsscale{0.75}

297: \rotatebox{270}{

298: \plotone{f3.ps}

299: }

300: \caption{

301: Expansion of the two rings around \grb\ with time.  The radius of each

302: ring was measured from the local maxima of the radial

303: profiles (Fig.~2). In both cases the expansion was

304: well-fitted with a functional form $\theta \propto

305: (t-t_0)^{1/2}$. The errors were assumed to be the width of

306: the bin size used for the radial profile measurement.}

307: \end{figure}

308: 

309: 

310: \begin{figure}

311: \centering

312: \epsscale{0.75}

313: \rotatebox{270}{

314: \plotone{f4.ps}

315: }

316: \caption{

317: Absorbed power-law model fits to the EPIC pn spectra of the \grb\

318: afterglow (circles, thick line) integrated over the entire observation

319: and the dust halo (squares, thin line) integrated over the first half

320: ($27895$~s) of the observation (during which the surface brightness

321: was high enough for a reasonable spectral extraction).  This clearly

322: demonstrates the spectrum of the halo is significantly steeper than

323: the afterglow.}

324: \end{figure}

325: 

326: 

327: The brightness of the halo depends on the product of the differential

328: scattering cross sections of the grains, the column densities of the

329: grains in the slabs and the integrated flux of the X-ray pulse and

330: afterglow. Interstellar extinction maps show structure in the GRB

331: direction, with a considerable increase to $A_V \approx 2$ mag at a

332: distance of $\sim 1.3$ kpc (Neckel \& Klare 1980).  This distance is

333: consistent with the location of the more distant dust slab we detect.

334: Adopting a mean grain size of $a=0.2$ $\mu$m, an $A_V = 2$ mag

335: corresponds to a grain column density of $1.5\times10^{8}$ cm$^{-2}$

336: (Mauche and Gorenstein 1986). The best fit to the ring structure

337: ($\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. $=836/489$) results from dividing this column

338: density between the two slabs, $N_{1}\sim 1\times10^{8}$ and

339: $N_{2}\sim 0.5\times10^{8}$ cm$^{-2}$ (i.e. most of the dust is in the

340: more distant slab). Using these values and $a=0.20\pm0.05$, the

341: time-integrated flux required for the soft X-ray pulse is $1600\pm800$

342: photon cm$^{-2}$ keV$^{-1}$ at 1~keV.  Assuming a 30 s rectangular

343: pulse this is equivalent to $\sim 5$ Crabs; using $\Gamma = 2$ the

344: predicted GRB flux in the $20-200$~keV band is $2.4\pm 1.2$ photon

345: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.  Given the assumptions (e.g. spectral shape) this

346: is in reasonable agreement with the value reported for \grb\ (peak of $\sim

347: 1.2$ photon cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, Gotz et al. 2003; Mereghetti \& Gotz

348: 2003). The X-ray burst is very bright compared to the afterglow (see

349: Watson \et 2004). Extrapolating the

350: decay of the afterglow (section~2) to the time of the GRB

351: accounts for only $\sim 2$ per cent of the halo emission.

352: 

353: The line of sight to \grb\ passes close to the center of the Gum

354: Nebula which appears as a $28\degg$ diameter sphere in H$\alpha$ centered at

355: $l=258\degg , b=-2\degg$ (Chanot \& Sivan 1983). The Gum Nebula is

356: likely to be a supershell created by repeated SNe explosions within

357: it. Reynoso \& Dubner (1997) detected a neutral gas disk

358: (H~{\textsc{i}}) associated with the Gum Nebula, located $\sim 500\pm

359: 100$ pc from us, with a radius of $\sim 150$ pc.

360: The dust slab nearest to us may be associated with the rear face of 

361: the Gum Nebula which is known to have a concentration of molecular

362: clouds (Woermann, Gaylard \& Otrupcek 2001).

363: 

364: \acknowledgements

365: 

366: This paper is based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA

367: science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by

368: ESA Member States and the USA (NASA). SV and AJL acknowledge support

369: from PPARC, UK. We acknowledge the benefits of collaboration within

370: the Research and Training Network ``Gamma-Ray Bursts: An Enigma and a

371: Tool'', funded by the European Union under contract

372: HPRN-CT-2002-00294. We thank an anonymous referee for a constructive

373: report. 

374: 

375: \begin{thebibliography}{}

376: 

377: \bibitem[Chanot \& Sivan (1983)]{chanot83}

378: Chanot, A., Sivan, J.P., 1983, A\&A, 121, 19

379: 

380: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman (1990)]{dickey90}

381: Dickey, J.M., Lockman, F.J. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215

382: 

383: \bibitem[Draine (2003)]{draine03}

384: Draine, B.T. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1026

385: 

386: \bibitem[Gotz et al.(2003)]{gotz03} Gotz, D., Mereghetti, S., Beck, M.,

387: Borkowski, J., Mowlavi, N. 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2459

388: 

389: \bibitem[Klose (1994)]{klose94}

390: Klose, S. 1994, A\&A, 289, L1

391: 

392: \bibitem[Mauche \& Gorenstein (1986)]{mauche86}

393: Mauche, C.W., Gorenstein, P. 1986, ApJ, 302, 371

394: 

395: \bibitem[Mereghetti \& Gotz (2003)]{mere03}

396: Mereghetti, S., Gotz, D. 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2460

397: 

398: \bibitem[Miralda-Escud\'e (1999)]{miralde99}

399: Miralda-Escud\'e 1999, ApJ, 512, 21

400: 

401: \bibitem[Neckel \& Klare (1980)]{neckel80}

402: Neckel, Th., Klare, G., A\&A Suppl., 42, 251

403: 

404: \bibitem[Overbeck (1965)]{overbeck65}

405: Overbeck, J.W. 1965, ApJ, 141, 864

406: 

407: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2003a)]{proch03a} Prochaska, J.,  

408: Chen, H.W., Hurley, K., Bloom, J.S., Graham, J.R., Vacca, W.D.

409: 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2475

410: 

411: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2003b)]{proc03b} Prochaska, J., Bloom, J.S.,

412: Chen, H.W., Hurley, K., Dressler, A., Osip, D. 2003, GRB Coordinates

413: Network, 2482

414: 

415: \bibitem[Predehl \et (1991)]{predehl91}

416: Predehl, P., Br\"auniger, Burket, W., Schmitt, J.H.M.M. 1991, A\&A, 246,

417: L40

418: 

419: \bibitem[Reynoso \& Dubner (1997)]{reynos97}

420: Reynoso, E. M., Dubner, G. M. 1997, A\&A Suppl., 123, 31

421: 

422: \bibitem[Rodriguez-Pascual \et (2003)]{rodriguez03}

423: Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual, P., Santos-Lle\'o, M., Gonzales-Riestra, R.,

424: Schartel, N., Altieri, B. 2003, GRB Coordinates

425: Network, 2474

426: 

427: \bibitem[Rolf (1983)]{rolf83}

428: Rolf, D.P. 1983, Nature, 302, 46

429: 

430: \bibitem[Santos-Lle\'o \& Calderon (2003)]{santos03} 

431: Santos-Lle\'o, M., Calderon, P. 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2464

432: 

433: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis(1998)]{1998ApJ...500..525S} 

434: Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 

435: 

436: \bibitem[Smith \& Dwek 1998]{smith98}

437: Smith, R.K., Dwek, E. 1998, ApJ, 503, 831

438: 

439: \bibitem[Soderberg \et (2003)]{soder03} Soderberg, A.M., Kulkarni,

440: S.R., Frail, D.A. 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2483

441: 

442: \bibitem[Struder \et (2001)]{Struder01} 

443: Str\"uder, L., \et 2001, A\&A, 365, L18

444: 

445: \bibitem[Tedds \et (2003)]{tedds03} 

446: Tedds, J., et al, 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2490

447: 

448: \bibitem[Tr\"umper \& Sch\"onfelder (1973)]{trumper73}

449: Tr\"umper, J., Sch\"onfelder, V. 1973, A\&A, 25\ 445

450: 

451: \bibitem[Turner \et (2001)]{Turner01} 

452: Turner, M.J.L., \et 2001, A\&A, 365, L27 

453: 

454: \bibitem[Vaughan \et (2003)]{vaughan03} 

455: Vaughan, S. \et \ 2003, GRB Coordinates Network, 2489

456: 

457: \bibitem[Watson \et (2004)]{watson03}

458: Watson, D. \et \ 2004, ApJ, in preparation

459: 

460: \bibitem[Woermann, Gaylard \& Otrupcek (2001)]{woermann01}

461: Woermann, B. Gaylard, M.J., Otrupcek, R. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 1213

462: 

463: \bibitem[Xu, Crotts, \& Kunkel (1995)]{xu95}

464: Xu, J., Crotts, A.P.S., Kunkel, W.E. 1995, ApJ, 451, 806

465: 

466: \end{thebibliography}

467: 

468: \end{document}

469: 

470: