1: \documentclass{aastex}
2: \usepackage{emulateapj5,times,mathptm}
3: \singlespace
4: \slugcomment{Accepted for the publication in the {\it Astrophysical Journal
5: Letters}}
6: \pagenumbering{arabic}
7: \def\ros{{\it ROSAT}}
8: \def\asca{{\it ASCA}}
9: \newcommand{\NH}{\mbox{$N_{\rm H}$}}
10: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}
11: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}
12: \def\fsecs{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^s$}}
13: \def\la{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
14: \def\ga{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
15:
16: \shortauthors{Park}
17: \shorttitle{G292.0+1.8}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20: \title{Nucleosynthesis in The Oxygen-Rich Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8
21: from {\it Chandra} X-Ray Spectroscopy}
22: \author{Sangwook Park\altaffilmark{1},John P. Hughes\altaffilmark{2},
23: Patrick O. Slane\altaffilmark{3}, David N. Burrows\altaffilmark{1},
24: Peter W. A. Roming\altaffilmark{1}, John A. Nousek\altaffilmark{1},
25: and Gordon P. Garmire\altaffilmark{1}}
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State
27: University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA. 16802;
28: park@astro.psu.edu}
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University,
30: 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ. 08854-8019}
31: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
32: Cambridge, MA. 02138}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35:
36: We continue our analysis of the Galactic oxygen-rich supernova
37: remnant (SNR) G292.0+1.8, which was observed with the {\it Chandra
38: X-ray Observatory}. The high angular resolution {\it Chandra} data
39: resolve metal-rich ejecta knots as well as the shocked circumstellar
40: medium. X-ray emission from the ejecta material in G292.0+1.8 is
41: dominated by highly ionized O, Ne and Mg. Measured abundance ratios
42: suggest that this material was produced during the hydrostatic
43: evolution of the massive progenitor star. In contrast to Cassiopeia A,
44: there is little evidence for X-ray-emitting ejecta from explosive
45: nucleosynthesis, i.e., material enriched in Si, S, and particularly,
46: Fe. This limits the amount of mixing or overturning
47: of deep ejecta material in G292.0+1.8 and suggests that the ejecta
48: are strongly stratified by composition and that the reverse shock
49: has not propagated to the Si/S or Fe-rich zones. On the other hand,
50: the bright equatorial belt is dominated by X-ray emission with normal
51: chemical composition, which supports shocked dense circumstellar material
52: for its origin. We find that the thermal pressure in the SNR is much
53: higher than the pressure in the pulsar wind nebula (PWN), indicating
54: that the reverse shock has not yet begun to interact with the PWN.
55:
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords {ISM: individual(G292.0+1.8, MSH 11$-$54) --- ISM: abundances
59: --- supernova remnants --- X-rays: ISM}
60:
61: \section {\label {sec:intro} INTRODUCTION}
62:
63: The Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) G292.0+1.8 (MSH 11$-$54) is a
64: source of strong oxygen and neon lines in the optical band and
65: has been classified as an ``oxygen-rich'' SNR \citep{goss79,murdin79}.
66: This abundance pattern is indicative of a core-collapse supernova (SN)
67: from a massive progenitor. The small number of young O-rich SNRs, where
68: the ejecta are not yet fully mixed with the ambient interstellar medium
69: (ISM), may thus provide a rare opportunity for a detailed study of the
70: SNR nucleosynthesis. For example, Hughes et al.\ (2000) have successfully
71: performed such a study with a Galactic O-rich SNR Cassiopeia A, which
72: revealed that explosive O- and Si-burning products from the deep interior
73: of the massive progenitor dominate ejecta material in that SNR.
74:
75: The unprecedented high angular resolution image of G292.0+1.8 obtained
76: by the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on board the {\it
77: Chandra X-Ray Observatory} has resolved the textbook-like structures
78: in the SNR: the associated pulsar and its wind nebula (PWN), the
79: metal-rich ejecta knots, the shocked circumstellar medium (CSM), and
80: the blast wave shock front propagating into the ambient ISM (Hughes
81: et al. 2001; Park et al. 2002, P02 hereafter).
82: Earlier works (Hughes \& Singh 1994; P02; Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb
83: 2003, G03 hereafter) have shown that G292.0+1.8 is dominated by O, Ne,
84: and Mg line emission and identified a plausible mass for the progenitor
85: star of $\sim$25 M$_{\odot}$$-$40 M$_{\odot}$ based on either the
86: integrated X-ray spectrum or spectra extracted over large emission
87: regions. As a continuation of our previous image analysis (P02), we here
88: report the results from our spectral analysis of G292.0+1.8. We take a
89: different approach than the previous work by G03, in order to study
90: several individual small-scale emission features which we demonstrate
91: to be knots of pure or nearly pure SN ejecta. Comparisons of the
92: abundance patterns in these knots to nucleosynthesis models allow us
93: to trace their origin back to specific burning sites in the progenitor
94: star, rather than global abundances averaged over the entire SNR.
95: Although our investigation does not exhaustively present all emission
96: features in the SNR, we do select a representative range of features
97: based on the emission line equivalent width (EW) maps (P02).
98: A description of the observation and the data reduction of the ACIS
99: data can be found in P02.
100:
101: \section{\label{sec:spec} Analysis}
102:
103: We corrected the ACIS data for charge transfer inefficiency
104: (CTI; Townsley et al. [2000; 2002a]) and use detector response
105: matrices generated by Townsley et al. (2002b) for the
106: CTI-corrected data. The low energy ($E$ $\la$ 1 keV) quantum
107: efficiency (QE) of the ACIS has degraded because of molecular
108: contamination on the optical blocking filter. We corrected
109: this time-dependent QE degradation by modifying the ancillary
110: response function for each extracted spectrum, utilizing the
111: IDL ACISABS software\footnote{For the discussion on this
112: instrumental issue, see
113: http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/Acis/Cal\_prods/qeDeg/index.html.
114: The software was developed by George Chartas and is available at
115: http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/chartas/xcontdir/xcont.html.}.
116:
117: Based on the preliminary results from the color image and EW
118: analysis by P02, we perform spectral
119: analysis of small angular size features (typically
120: $\sim$10$^{\prime\prime}$ scales)
121: across the SNR. We find that several regional spectra
122: (Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}) represent the range of spectral
123: characteristics seen in the SNR (P02). These selected regions are
124: also morphologically well-defined in both the color image and the EW
125: images and contain comparable photon statistics.
126: We subtracted background spectra from source free regions of
127: the detector. Each spectrum was binned to contain at
128: least 20 counts per channel and fitted in the 0.5 $-$ 4 keV band.
129: We fixed the abundances for elemental species He, C, N, and Ni at
130: solar \citep{anders89}, because contributions from these elements
131: to the X-ray spectrum in the fitted bandpass are small.
132: We allow other elemental abundances to vary freely.
133: In the spectral fits described below, we use a non-equilibrium
134: ionization (NEI) plane-parallel shock model \citep{borkowski01}
135: unless otherwise noted.
136:
137: The bright equatorial belt of G292.0+1.8 appears to be dominated by
138: X-ray emission from dense CSM produced by stellar winds from
139: the massive progenitor as heated by the blast wave (P02).
140: A typical spectrum of this bright central belt-like feature is
141: represented by that of region 1. This regional spectrum contains
142: $\sim$8500 photons and is best fitted with an NEI shock with electron
143: temperature $kT$ $\sim$ 0.7 keV
144: (Figure \ref{fig:fig2}; Table \ref{tbl:tab1}). The near-solar fitted
145: abundances (Table \ref{tbl:tab1}) are consistent with the proposed
146: circumstellar origin, rather than metal-rich ejecta.
147:
148: On the other hand, the spectrum from region 2 shows remarkably
149: different features (Figure \ref{fig:fig2}). The region 2 spectrum
150: contains $\sim$2000 photons, and is dominated by emission from
151: the highly ionized Ly$\alpha$ lines of Ne ($E$ $\sim$ 1.05 keV) and
152: Mg ($E$ $\sim$ 1.48 keV), which unambiguously indicate emission
153: from metal-rich ejecta. The strong Ne Ly$\alpha$ and Mg Ly$\alpha$
154: line emission indicates a high electron temperature and/or an advanced
155: ionization state. In fact, the spectrum of region 2 can be described
156: by a thermal plasma model in collisional ionization
157: equilibrium (CIE) with an electron temperature of $kT$ $\sim$ 0.8
158: keV. An NEI model can also fit the data with a higher electron
159: temperature ($kT$ $\sim$ 5 keV; $n_et$ $\sim$ 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{11}$
160: cm$^{-3}$ s). With the current photon statistics, we cannot
161: discriminate between these models. Nonetheless, strong enhancements
162: in the O, Ne, and Mg abundances are present in either case.
163: Although the statistical uncertainties are relatively large, O, Ne,
164: and Mg abundances are evidently enhanced whereas Si, S, and Fe
165: abundances are low (Table~\ref{tbl:tab1}). The well-defined, compact
166: morphology of this feature (angular size of $\sim$8$^{\prime\prime}$
167: in diameter, physical size of $\sim$0.2 pc for a distance of $d$ = 6
168: kpc for G292.0+1.8 as recently determined by Gaensler \& Wallace
169: [2003]) allows us to employ a local background subtraction. We then
170: find that this regional spectrum can be described with emission
171: from only O, Ne, Mg, and Si with no contribution from underlying
172: continuum other than that contributed by these species. This is
173: likely a knot of pure metal ejecta.
174:
175: The northern boundary of the SNR has a few knots of emission which
176: appear to be clumpy ejecta material embedded in fainter diffuse
177: emission (see Figure~1 in P02). These features are also strong in
178: the EW images (P02). Spectra from these knots can be
179: characteristically represented by those from regions 3, 4, and 5
180: (Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}). Regions 3 and 4 contain $\sim$6200
181: and $\sim$3700 photons, respectively, and are best fitted with a high
182: temperature ($kT$ $\sim$ 3 $-$ 5 keV) NEI plasma
183: (Figure~\ref{fig:fig3}a; Figure~\ref{fig:fig3}b; Table~\ref{tbl:tab1}).
184: The metal abundances are highly enhanced, confirming that these knots are
185: ejecta. Table~\ref{tbl:tab2} presents the abundances of O, Ne, and
186: Mg relative to Si; these abundance ratios are much higher than
187: solar ratios and are comparable to those in region 2.
188: The region 5 spectrum is described with a low electron temperature
189: of $kT$ $\sim$ 0.6 keV (Figure~\ref{fig:fig3}c; Table~\ref{tbl:tab1}),
190: which is similar to that of region 1. The ionization timescale
191: is significantly larger than those for regions 3 and 4. The best-fit
192: abundances for all fitted elements are a few times higher than solar,
193: but, unlike regions 2, 3, and 4, the abundance ratios with respect to
194: Si are less enhanced (Table~\ref{tbl:tab2}). Region 5 thus appears to be
195: ejecta material that is relatively more enhanced in Si and S than other
196: portions of the SNR.
197:
198:
199: \section{\label{sec:disc} DISCUSSION}
200:
201: X-ray spectra from regions 2, 3, and 4 unambiguously demonstrate
202: characteristics of metal-rich ejecta, which are dominated by
203: emission from highly ionized O, Ne, and Mg. Low-Z elements
204: typically dominate the ejecta throughout the SNR,
205: and we find little evidence of enriched heavier elements such as Si,
206: S, and Fe. This is in striking contrast to the features discovered
207: in Cas A in which strongly enhanced Si, S, and Fe abundances are
208: present \citep{hughes00}. We have found only marginal evidence of
209: Si- and S-rich ejecta in G292.0+1.8 (e.g., region 5). In core-collapse
210: nucleosynthesis models, low-Z elements are primarily produced
211: in the outer layers of the unprocessed (i.e., hydrostatic He-burning)
212: C-core while high-Z species are synthesized by explosive Ne-, O- and/or
213: Si-burning in the deep interior of the massive progenitor star
214: (e.g., Thielemann et al. 1996). Our results thus suggest that
215: extensive mixing or overturning of the explosive nucleosynthesis products
216: has not occurred in G292.0+1.8 and furthermore that the reverse shock
217: in the remnant has not propagated to the Si/S or Fe-rich zones.
218: The alternate possibility, that no Fe or Si/S ejecta were produced, seems
219: unlikely.
220:
221: Ne appears to be considerably more abundant in G292.0+1.8
222: than predicted by standard
223: core-collapse models in which O is invariably
224: overabundant relative to Ne. For instance, assuming
225: $n_e$ $\approx$ 9$n_{Ne}$ (where $n_e$ is the electron density
226: and $n_{Ne}$ is the Ne ion density) for the mean ionization state
227: implied by the observed spectrum of region 2, $n_e$ $\sim$ 2
228: cm$^{-3}$ and so a Ne ejecta mass of $M_{Ne}$ $\sim$ 8 $\times$
229: 10$^{-4}$ $M_{\odot}$ can be derived (we assumed a spherical
230: geometry with an apparent angular radius of 4$^{\prime\prime}$
231: and a distance of 6 kpc). Similarily, an O ejecta mass of $M_{O}$
232: $\sim$ 11 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ $M_{\odot}$ is derived. This indicates
233: that the O and Ne ejecta masses are nearly comparable, whereas models
234: typically predict a several times larger mass of O than that of Ne
235: (e.g., Thielemann et al. 1996). This Ne overabundance is thus
236: difficult to understand in terms of standard core-collapse
237: nucleosynthesis models. An extensive study of nucleosynthesis
238: models for various conditions of stellar structure and burning
239: processes may be necessary in order to interpret this
240: anomaly, which is beyond the scope of this {\it Letter}.
241:
242: We compared the measured abundance ratios of O:Si, Ne:Si, and Mg:Si
243: with available core-collapse nucleosynthesis models.
244: The O:Si abundance ratios (in number) are larger than solar by a
245: factor of $\ga$5 for regions 2, 3, and 4. Ne:Si and Mg:Si ratios
246: are also large, $\sim$4 $-$ 15 times higher than solar. Assuming
247: $^{16}$O, $^{20}$Ne, $^{24}$Mg, and $^{28}$Si to be the dominant
248: isotopes, we derive elemental mass ratios in
249: each region (Table~\ref{tbl:tab2}). We compare these mass ratios
250: with the mass fraction ratios from model nucleosynthesis of specific
251: burning sites interior to a 20 $M_{\odot}$ \citep{thielemann96} and
252: a 25 $M_{\odot}$ \citep{woosley95} progenitor. The observed O:Si,
253: Ne:Si, and Mg:Si mass ratios for regions 2, 3, and 4 appear to be
254: roughly consistent with those of nucleosynthesis model products of
255: unprocessed C-core material from the hydrostatic evolution
256: of the massive progenitor and are not a good match to abundances
257: from the explosive Ne-burning regardless of the nucleosynthesis
258: models (Table~\ref{tbl:tab2}). With only the abundances of
259: hydrostatic burning products available, it is difficult to constrain
260: the mass of the progenitor star. Reliable progenitor masses may be
261: determined by comparing both the hydrostatic and the explosive
262: nucleosynthesis products between the observations and the models.
263: Previous studies of G292.0+1.8 (e.g., Hughes \& Singh 1994; G03)
264: derived progenitor masses by assuming that the entire ejecta was
265: emitting X-rays so that the measured abundances could be directly
266: compared to integrated model yields. This assumption now appears to
267: be invalid based on our results.
268:
269: We estimate the volume of region 1 using a simple slab-like
270: cylindrical geometry with an apparent angular size
271: of 11$\farcs$6 $\times$ 8$\farcs$6 (0.34 $\times$ 0.25 pc) and a
272: depth of $\sim$0.15 pc along the line of sight. This, plus the
273: overall spectral normalization, results in a value for the
274: postshock electron density of $n_e$ $\sim$ 40 cm$^{-3}$.
275: Similarly high density values are found among the other
276: bright filaments of the equatorial belt. These density values are
277: larger than the ambient density of the blast wave
278: measured at the outer boundary of the SNR ($n_0$ $\sim$ 0.2 $-$ 0.5
279: cm$^{-3}$; G03), by nearly two orders of magnitudes. These results
280: are supportive of the proposed dense, asymetric CSM origin for the
281: equatorial belt of G292.0+1.8. Our results indicate a high
282: thermal pressure ($P$ $\sim$ 8 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ ergs cm$^{-3}$)
283: for the shocked CSM which is more than an order of magnitude higher
284: than that of the PWN ($P$ $\ga$ 10$^{-9}$ ergs cm$^{-3}$; Hughes et al.
285: 2003). The large difference in pressures gives strong support
286: to the idea that the reverse shock has not reached the PWN, further
287: reinforcing our earlier suggestion that the reverse shock has not
288: propagated into the heavy element dominated central portions of the ejecta.
289:
290: We conclude by summarizing our view of the nature and evolutionary
291: state of G292.0+1.8. We find that the compact ejecta knots in the SNR
292: are dominated by the species O, Ne, and Mg, and show a wide range of
293: temperatures and ionization timescales. The relative abundances are
294: best described by the hydrostatic burning products from a massive
295: progenitor, although Ne appears to be relatively more
296: enhanced than the nucleosynthesis models predict. There are a number
297: of bright dense filaments of normal solar-type composition near the
298: remnant's center as well as fainter, lower density shocked matter near
299: the outer edge. The former are believed to represent dense stellar wind
300: material, while the latter is probably the ambient interstellar
301: medium. The wide variety of densities and temperatures, as our
302: analysis reveals, indicates that the two-temperature picture
303: of G03 for G292.0+1.8 is grossly oversimplified. From our spectral
304: fits we measure thermal pressures in the shocked gas that are much
305: higher than the pressure in the PWN. This argues that
306: the reverse shock in G292.0+1.8 has not yet propagated deeply enough
307: into the ejecta to encounter the PWN. Thus there should be a reservoir
308: of cold unshocked ejecta between the PWN and the reverse shock. It is
309: plausible to conclude that this is where the Si/S and Fe rich ejecta
310: are in G292.0+1.8, since these species are missing in the optical and
311: X-ray--emitting ejecta. In contrast to Cas A, the ejecta in G292.0+1.8
312: appear not to have undergone extensive mixing and overturning, but have
313: largely retained their original compositional stratification.
314:
315: \acknowledgments
316: {This work was funded by NASA under contract NAS8-38252 to Penn State,
317: NAS8-39073 to CfA and {\it Chandra} grant G01-2052X to Rutgers University.
318: }
319:
320: \begin{thebibliography}{}
321: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse 1989]{anders89} Anders, E., \& Grevesse,
322: N. 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197
323: \bibitem[Borkowski et al. 2001]{borkowski01} Borkowski, K. J., Lyerly,
324: W. J., \& Reynolds, S. P. 2001, ApJ, 548, 820
325: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Wallace 2003]{gaensler03} Gaensler, B. M., \&
326: Wallace, B. J. 2003, ApJ, in press
327: \bibitem[Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb 2003]{gonzalez03} Gonzalez, M., \&
328: Safi-Harb, S. 2003, ApJ, 583L, 91, (G03)
329: \bibitem[Goss et al. 1979]{goss79} Goss, W. M., et al. 1979, MNRAS, 188, 357
330: \bibitem[Hughes \& Singh 1994]{hughes94} Hughes, J. P., \& Singh, K. P.
331: 1994, ApJ, 422, 126
332: \bibitem[Hughes et al. 2000]{hughes00} Hughes, J. P., Rakowski, C. E.,
333: Burrows, D. N. et al. 2000, ApJ, 528, L109
334: \bibitem[Hughes et al. 2001]{hughes01} Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O.,
335: Burrows, D. N. et al. 2001, ApJ, 559, L53
336: \bibitem[Hughes et al. 2003]{hughes03} Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O.,
337: Park, S. et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, L139
338: \bibitem[Murdin \& Clark 1979]{murdin79} Murdin, P., \& Clark, D. H.
339: 1979, MNRAS, 189, 501
340: \bibitem[Park et al. 2002]{park02} Park, S., Roming, P. W. A., Hughes, J. P.
341: et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, L39, (P02)
342: \bibitem[Thielemann et al 1996]{thielemann96} Thielemann, F-. K., Nomoto,
343: K., \& Hashimoto, M. 1996, ApJ, 460, 408
344: \bibitem[Townsley et al. 2000]{townsley00} Townsley, L. K. et al. 2000, ApJ,
345: 534, L139
346: \bibitem[Townsley et al. 2002a]{townsley02a} Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S.,
347: Nousek, J. A. 2002a, Nucl Inst \& Methods in Phys Res Sec A, 486, 751
348: \bibitem[Townsley et al. 2002b]{townsley02b} Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S.,
349: Chartas, G. et al. 2002b, Nucl Inst \& Methods in Phys Res Sec A, 486, 716
350: \bibitem[Woosley \& Weaver 1995]{woosley95} Woosley, S. E., \& Weaver,
351: T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181
352:
353: \end{thebibliography}
354:
355: \clearpage
356:
357: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
358: \footnotesize
359: \tablecaption{Results from Spectral Fittings\tablenotemark{a}
360: \label{tbl:tab1}}
361: \tablewidth{0pt}
362: \tablehead{ \colhead{Region} & \colhead{$kT$} & \colhead{$N_H$} &
363: \colhead{$n_et$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{O} & \colhead{Ne} &
364: \colhead{Mg} & \colhead{Si}& \colhead{S} & \colhead{Fe} &
365: \colhead{${\chi}^{2}/{\nu}$}\\
366: & \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$)} &
367: \colhead{(10$^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$ s)} & & & & & & &}
368: \startdata
369: \vspace{1mm}
370: 1 & 0.66$^{+0.12}_{-0.04}$ & 3.8$^{+1.2}_{-0.7}$ &
371: 7.2$^{+2.5}_{-1.7}$ & 1.1$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 0.6$^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ &
372: 0.4$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 0.4$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 1.0$^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$ &
373: 0.4$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 93.1/85\\
374: \vspace{1mm}
375: 2\tablenotemark{c} & 0.82$^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ & 4.4$^{+0.8}_{-1.6}$ &
376: - & 4.7$^{+4.1}_{-2.2}$ & 15.4$^{+11.5}_{-5.8}$ &
377: 8.1$^{+6.0}_{-3.0}$ & 1.0$^{+0.9}_{-0.4}$ & $<$ 0.6 &
378: $<$ 0.1 & 61.7/51\\
379: \vspace{1mm}
380: 3 & 5.31$^{+3.83}_{-2.08}$ & 7.7$^{+0.5}_{-0.5}$ &
381: 0.8$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 57$^{+168}_{-23}$ & 129$^{+301}_{-50}$ &
382: 72$^{+168}_{-29}$& 8.9$^{+12.1}_{-3.8}$ & 5.1$^{+2.0}_{-2.0}$ &
383: $<$ 1.0 & 90.8/61\\
384: \vspace{1mm}
385: 4 & 3.09$^{+6.01}_{-1.28}$ & 6.4$^{+0.8}_{-1.1}$ &
386: 0.5$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 13.0$^{+7.9}_{-2.8}$ & 21.9$^{+7.7}_{-4.9}$ &
387: 12.4$^{+8.2}_{-2.8}$ & 2.4$^{+1.5}_{-0.6}$ & $<$ 0.6 &
388: 2.2$^{+1.5}_{-0.7}$ & 76.3/50\\
389: \vspace{1mm}
390: 5 & 0.59$^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$ & 3.0$^{+0.5}_{-0.5}$ &
391: 80.1$^{+79.9}_{-28.1}$ & 5.3$^{+4.4}_{-1.4}$ & 7.0$^{+5.6}_{-1.7}$ &
392: 2.8$^{+2.2}_{-0.7}$ & 4.0$^{+2.9}_{-0.9}$ & 5.5$^{+2.1}_{-1.3}$ &
393: 0.4$^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ & 124.4/87\\
394: \enddata
395: \tablenotetext{a}{1$\sigma$ errors are quoted for the abundances,
396: otherwise, 2$\sigma$ errors are presented.}
397: \tablenotetext{b}{The errors have been obtained after fixing $N_H$ and
398: $kT$ at the best-fit values.}
399: \tablenotetext{c}{Best-fit parameters from a CIE model is presented
400: for the region 2 spectrum.}
401:
402: \end{deluxetable}
403:
404: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}
405: \footnotesize
406: \tablecaption{Mass Ratios\tablenotemark{a}
407: \label{tbl:tab2}}
408: \tablewidth{0pt}
409: \tablehead{ \colhead{Elements} & \colhead{Region} & \colhead{Region} &
410: \colhead{Region} & \colhead{Region} & \colhead{C-Core\tablenotemark{b}} &
411: \colhead{C-Core} & \colhead{Ex Ne\tablenotemark{b}}& \colhead{Ex Ne} &
412: \colhead{Solar\tablenotemark{b}} \\
413: & \colhead{2} & \colhead{3} & \colhead{4} & \colhead{5} & 20 $M_{\odot}$
414: & 25 $M_{\odot}$ & 20 $M_{\odot}$ & 25 $M_{\odot}$ & }
415: \startdata
416: \vspace{1mm}
417: O/Si & 64.4$^{+24.7}_{-19.2}$ & 88.2$^{+12.4}_{-10.0}$ &
418: 74.2$^{+12.6}_{-8.6}$ & 18.2$^{+2.1}_{-1.4}$ & 36 & 110 & 10 & 2 & 13.7 \\
419: \vspace{1mm}
420: Ne/Si & 38.1$^{+11.4}_{-8.2}$ & 36.1$^{+4.7}_{-3.6}$ &
421: 22.6$^{+4.0}_{-2.9}$ & 4.4$^{+0.4}_{-0.4}$ & 6.5 & 27 & 0.5 & 0.01 & 2.5 \\
422: \vspace{1mm}
423: Mg/Si & 7.5$^{+2.2}_{-1.6}$ & 7.4$^{+1.0}_{-0.8}$ &
424: 4.7$^{+0.8}_{-0.6}$ & 0.6$^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & 4.5 & 5.3 & 1 & 0.002 & 0.9 \\
425: \enddata
426:
427: \tablenotetext{a}{The mass ratios and their uncertainties (1$\sigma$)
428: are derived from the abundance ratios with the Si abundances fixed at
429: the best-fit values.}
430:
431: \tablenotetext{b}{Nucleosynthesis models are based on Thielemann et al.
432: (1996) for the 20 $M_{\odot}$, Woosley \& Weaver (1995) for the 25
433: $M_{\odot}$ progenitors. C-Core indicates abundances for the carbon-core
434: region; Ex Ne indicates abundances from explosive Ne burning.
435: The solar ratios are from Anders \& Grevesse
436: (1989).}
437:
438: \end{deluxetable}
439:
440:
441: \begin{figure}[]
442: \figurenum{1}
443: \centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=12cm]{f1.ps}}
444: \figcaption[]{The gray-scale (darker scales mean brighter intensity)
445: 0.3 $-$ 8 keV band {\it Chandra}/ACIS image of G292.0+1.8. Regions
446: 1 $-$ 5 are marked.
447: \label{fig:fig1}}
448: \end{figure}
449:
450: \begin{figure}[]
451: \figurenum{2}
452: \centerline{{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=10cm]{f2.ps}}}
453: \figcaption[]{Spectra from the equatorial belt (region 1) and
454: the H-like Ne-enriched knot (region 2) within G292.0+1.8. Each
455: spectrum has been arbitrarily scaled for the purpose of display.
456: \label{fig:fig2}}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459: \begin{figure}[]
460: \figurenum{3}
461: \centerline{{\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8cm]{f3a.ps}}}
462: \centerline{{\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8cm]{f3b.ps}}}
463: \centerline{{\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8cm]{f3c.ps}}}
464: \figcaption[]{Spectra from metal-rich knots within G292.0+1.8.
465: Panels (a), (b), and (c) are spectra from regions 3, 4, and 5,
466: respectively.
467: \label{fig:fig3}}
468: \end{figure}
469:
470: \end{document}
471: