astro-ph0401241/ms.tex
1: %\documentstyle[12pt,/home/pepi/new/aastex/aasms4]{article}  % Double-spaced format for submission
2: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4]{article}   % Nice, compact format w/out space jumps
3: %\documentstyle[/home/pepi/new/aastex/aas2pp4]{article}  % Nice, 2-col format for preprints
4: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
5: \usepackage{emulateapj5}  %  ApJ journal style
6: 
7: %\lefthead{Fabbiano et al.}  \righthead{{\it Chandra} ACIS-S
8: %Observations of NGC 4038/4039}
9: 
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%             DEFINITIONS           %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \def\asca{{\it ASCA }}		
12: \def\einstein{{\it Einstein }}	% ApJ uses Italics for 'Einstein' Satellite 
13: \def\ergcm2s{~erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ } % erg per cm**2 second smay be
14: \def\funit{~erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ } % erg per cm**2 second 
15: \def\erg{~erg s$^{-1}$}		% erg per second 
16: \def\lunit{~erg s$^{-1}$}		% erg per second 
17: \def\cmcube{~cm$^{-3}$}		% 
18: \def\cmsq{~cm$^{-2}$ }		% 
19: \def\nh{~$\rm{N_{H}}$}
20: 
21: \def\lx{~$\rm{L_{X}}$}
22: \def\etal{et al.~}		% Present ApJ style, override older definitions
23: \def\kms{~km s$^{-1}$}		% kilometers per second 
24: \def\kmsmpc{~km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$}
25: \def\msun{~M$_{\odot}$}
26: \def\deg{$^{\circ}$}
27: \def\n4038{~NGC4038/39}		% Use in text.  For title, use NGC 4038/4039
28: \def\rosat{{\it ROSAT }}		% ApJ uses Italics for 'ROSAT'
29: \def\chandra{{\it Chandra }}
30: \def\sherpa{{\it Sherpa }}
31: \def\x2{$\chi^{2}$}	
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: 
34: 
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Emulate ApJ stuff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36: 
37: \makeatletter
38: \newenvironment{inlinetable}{%
39: \def\@captype{table}%
40: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}\footnotesize}
41: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
42: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{%
43: \def\@captype{figure}%
44: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
45: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
46: \makeatother
47: 
48: % To inc
49: 
50: 
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: 
53: 
54: \begin{document}
55: 
56: \title{X-raying Chemical Evolution and Galaxy Formation in The Antennae 
57:  \\}
58: 
59: \author{ G. Fabbiano$^1$,  A. Baldi$^1$, A. R. King$^2$, T. J. Ponman$^3$,
60: J. Raymond$^1$, A. Read$^3$, A. Rots$^1$, Fran\c cois Schweizer$^4$, A. Zezas$^1$}
61: \affil{$^1$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
62: Street, Cambridge, MA 02138;  gfabbiano@cfa.harvard.edu; azezas@cfa.harvard.edu,
63: arots@cfa.harvard.edu}
64: \affil{$^2$Theoretical Astrophysics Group, University of Leicester, Leicester 
65: LE1 7RH, UK; ark@astro.le.ac.uk}
66: \affil{$^3$ School of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham 
67: B15 2TT, UK; tjp@star.sr.bham.ac.uk}
68: \affil{$^4$Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101-1292;
69:  schweizer@ociw.edu}
70: 
71: \shorttitle{X-raying The Antennae}
72: \shortauthors{Fabbiano et al.}
73: \bigskip
74: 
75: \begin{abstract}
76: We present the integrated 411~ks {\it Chandra} ACIS-S exposure of the Antennae
77: galaxies (NGC~4038/39). Besides a rich population of point-like sources, 
78: this spectacular image reveals a spatially and spectrally complex hot 
79: diffuse gaseous component. For the first time we detect intense line
80: emission from Fe, Ne, Mg and Si in The Antennae, and obtain a detailed picture 
81: of spatially varied metal abundances in the hot interstellar medium (ISM) of
82: a galaxy. In certain regions, the abundances of $\alpha$-elements may be many
83: times solar, while the Fe abundance is sub-solar or near-solar. The
84: differences in the local metal enrichment of the hot ISM may be related 
85: to the local star formation rates and to the degree of confinement of the
86: enriched hot ISM.
87: We also report large-scale gaseous features, including two gigantic,
88: $\sim$10-kpc-scale `loops' extending to the South of the merging disks,
89: and a low-surface-brightness hot halo, extending out to $\sim$18~kpc.
90: These features may be related to superwinds from the starburst in The Antennae
91: or result from the merger hydrodynamics. Their long cooling times suggest that
92: they may persist to form the hot X-ray halo of the emerging elliptical galaxy.
93: 
94: \end{abstract}
95: \keywords{galaxies: peculiar --- galaxies: individual(NGC4038/39) --- galaxies:
96: interactions --- X-rays: galaxies  --- X-ray: ISM}
97: 
98: 
99: \section{Introduction}
100: The interacting pair of galaxies NGC~4038/39 (The Antennae), 
101: at a distance of 19~Mpc ($H_0 = 75$), has been studied intensely 
102: at all wavelengths as the nearest example of galaxies undergoing a 
103: major merger (e.g., Whitmore et al.\ 1999; Hibbard et al.\ 2001;
104: Neff \& Ulvestad 2000; Wilson et al.\ 2000; Fabbiano et al.\ 2001). 
105: The Antennae provide a local laboratory where astronomers
106: can easily observe phenomena that occur in the deeper Universe.  There,
107: merging is common and may be an important step in the evolution
108: of galaxies (e.g., Navarro, Frenk \& White 1995). 
109: 
110: The Antennae have been studied in X-rays since their first observation with {\it Einstein} 
111: (Fabbiano \& Trinchieri 1983). The first {\it Chandra} ACIS-S (Weisskopf et al.\
112: 2000) observation of this system in December 1999
113: revealed both a population of exceptionally luminous point-like sources 
114: and complex hot diffuse emission with temperatures
115: in the range $kT\approx$ 0.3--0.8~keV.
116: This hot gaseous emission is 
117: particularly luminous in the regions with the most active star formation
118: (Fabbiano et al.\ 2001; Zezas et al.\ 2002a, b; Zezas \& Fabbiano 2002; 
119: Fabbiano et al.\ 2003c). Based on these results, our team was awarded
120: a deep monitoring campaign of The Antennae with {\it Chandra}, which took
121: place in 2001--2002, and yielded a total 114~hr exposure, including
122: the original 1999 December data.
123: Preliminary reports of spectral and flux variability of the most
124: luminous X-ray sources in The Antennae are given in Fabbiano et al.\ (2003a, b).
125: 
126: In this Letter we present the entire deep data set
127: and give a first report on the spectral analysis of the diffuse emission,
128: made possible by the exceptional signal-to-noise ratio of our spectra.
129: The main result is the discovery of large spatial variations and enhancements
130: of the metal abundances.
131: Previous attempts at measuring the metallicity of the hot ISM with
132: the December 1999 data were
133: inconclusive (Fabbiano et al.\ 2003c).
134: We also report on the large-scale properties of the diffuse emission: 
135: While the first {\it Chandra} observations already suggested gaseous diffuse
136: emission south of the system (Fabbiano et al.\ 2001), the new deep
137: image reveals complex large-scale features.
138: 
139: 
140: 
141: 
142: \section{Deep {\it Chandra} Image of The Antennae}
143: 
144: Together with the original observation, the total {\it Chandra} ACIS-S
145: exposure on The Antennae is 411~ks, after background flare screening.
146: The standard Level 2 event files obtained by the Standard Data Processing 
147: (SDP) were used. The data set consists of seven observations 
148: ($Obs ID$: 315, 3040, 3041, 3042, 3043, 3044, 3718). 
149: Figure~1 shows the astrometry-corrected and co-added `raw' data.
150: Details of the data reduction procedures are given in
151: Fabbiano et al.\ (2003a), Zezas et al.\ (2003, in preparation) and Baldi et al.\ (2003, in preparation). 
152: CIAO v3.0.1 and XSPEC were used for the data analysis. The latest ACIS gain
153: calibration was applied. Figure~2 shows an 
154: adaptively-smoothed true-color image, obtained from data  
155: in the 0.3--0.65, 0.65--1.5 and 1.5--6.0~keV energy bands.
156: This spectacular image shows both a population of point-like sources
157: and diffuse emission with a variety of spatial scales and spectral colors.
158: We will discuss elsewhere our detailed results on
159: the point-source population (Zezas et al.\ 2003, in preparation). 
160: In summary, we detect 120 sources ($3\sigma$), with 0.3--10.0~keV
161: luminosities in the range
162: $\sim 2 \times 10^{37}$\,--\,$5 \times 10^{39}$~\erg\, for 
163: an assumed power-law
164: spectrum with $\Gamma = 1.7$ and $N_{\rm H} = 3.4 \times 10^{20} \rm cm^{-2}$
165: (Galactic). Of the sources more luminous than the 
166: Eddington luminosity of a neutron star ($3 \times 10^{38}
167: \rm erg~s^{-1}$), $\sim$70\% are variable. 
168: 
169: Below, we concentrate on the most striking features of the diffuse soft
170: emission, which is detected mostly below 1.5~keV. Because of its spectrum,
171: this emission is likely to
172: be thermal emission from hot plasmas (Fabbiano et al.\ 2001, 2003c).
173: Figures~1 and 2 show that this emission is most intense in those areas
174: within the optical bodies of the galaxies that coincide with the most actively
175: star-forming regions. Figure~2 illustrates that this hot ISM is rich 
176: in features, both spatially and spectrally, as suggested by the varied 
177: range of X-ray colors. Larger-scale, more diffuse emission
178: is also present, and includes two 10~kpc-size 
179: (110\arcsec\ at D=19~Mpc) loop-like structures extending to the south of the main body
180: of emission.
181: 
182: 
183: 
184: \section{Metal Abundances of the Hot ISM}
185: 
186: The X-ray spectra extracted from different regions of the hot ISM
187: show a variety of continuum shapes and line-emission strengths (see Baldi
188: et al.\ 2003 for a complete study).  In particular, besides the Fe-L complex
189: ($\sim$0.65--1.15~keV), 
190: lines of Ne X (0.92~keV), Mg XI-XII (1.34--1.47~keV), and Si XIII-XIV 
191: (1.85--2.01~keV) are visible in some of the spectra.
192: Figure~3 shows a {\it metallicity map} of the hot ISM.
193: The abundance of the above elements varies
194: widely in different regions, exceeding in places that of our local solar
195: neighborhood. 
196: {\it Chandra} observations of the dwarf starburst galaxy NGC~1569 have
197: led to the detection of large-scale metal-enriched hot winds (Martin et al.\
198: 2002).  Our deep {\it Chandra} data allow for the first time the detailed
199: correlation of metal abundances with different galaxian regions and the
200: stellar populations.
201: 
202: Table~1 summarizes the
203: spectral properties of three  regions (out of 21
204: regions studied in Baldi et al.\  2003), representative of the range of
205: abundances. They are marked in
206: Figure~3 with `1', `5' and `7'.
207: We follow the numbering convention of Baldi et al.\ (2003)
208: for these regions, and we name them with R1, R5 and R7 in this paper. 
209: We fitted the spectra using the most 
210: complete thermal model available to us, the APEC model (Smith et al.\ 2001).
211: An intrinsic variable N$_H$ was fitted, in addition to the fixed line-of-sight
212: Galactic N$_H$. A power-law was also included in the fits to represent  harder sources
213: such as undetected X-ray binaries or young supernova remnants (SNR), and
214: yielded best-fit $\Gamma$ in the range 1.8--2.
215: Table~1 also lists mean stellar ages of the regions, estimated via a 
216: number-weighted average of the mean ages of highly reddened, extremely
217: young clusters (4 Myr; Zhang, Fall, \& Whitmore 2001)
218: and young blue clusters (15 Myr; Whitmore et al.\ 1999), and
219: the relative strength of the star formation rate (SFR) as measured by
220: the index  (U+H$\alpha$)/(V+I). 
221: 
222: R1 consists of two metal-poor regions in the northern loop of the
223: disk of NGC~4038. Figures~1 and 2 show a plume extending out of NGC~4038
224: near the western region, suggesting possible outflows.
225: R5, within the disk of NGC~4038, is a half-shell feature
226: of the hot ISM and has the most impressive emission lines. The spectrum and 
227: best-fit model (with residuals) are shown in Figure~4. 
228: This region is also the one with the highest relative SFR and, given its
229: small area, the largest SFR per unit area.
230: R7 is the absorbed region corresponding to the CO-rich ``Overlap
231: Region,'' where the most recent, intense star formation is occurring
232: (Wilson et al.\ 2000; see Fabbiano et al.\ 2003c).
233: The mean age of this region is based on optically detected clusters, so it may
234: represent an upper limit on the stellar age of the inner obscured regions. 
235: The relative SFR is large, but not as high as that of R5.
236: 
237: In both R5 and R7 the $\alpha$-elements are relatively more prominent than Iron, consistent with
238: enrichment by the SNe of type II expected in a young stellar population.
239: While we cannot draw any strong conclusions based on only three points,
240: Table~1 may suggest a trend between relative SFR and $\alpha$-element
241: abundances. 
242: The low abundances of R1 may also in part be due to the presence of
243: outflows, which
244: may disperse the element-enriched hot ISM outside of the galaxy.
245:  
246: While the presence of metals in the hot ISM is certain, the values of the
247: abundances are somewhat model-dependent.  For the 
248: static model, the radiative cooling time ($2 \times 10^7$ years) is longer than
249: the relevant recombination time ($2 \times 10^5$ years), and it is 
250: self-consistent to assume ionization equilibrium.  If the X-rays
251: come from a collection of SNRs, there 
252: could be some departure from equilibrium, but overionized
253: and underionized regions will tend to cancel out.  
254: If there is a wind, there
255: could be significant adiabatic cooling, so the ionization state
256: would be that appropriate for a higher temperature and abundances
257: could be overestimated (e.g., Breitschwerdt 2003).
258: That might affect the derived abundances for the low-temperature
259: regions far out in the halo, but high density regions such as R5 should not
260: be greatly affected.
261: R5 is remarkable for its high concentration of young star clusters.
262: It is possible that the
263: young clusters are still injecting kinetic energy predominantly by means
264: of stellar winds in this region, and that the temperature will increase
265: as the SN rate increases (Gilbert 2002).  It seems equally
266: likely
267: that the heated gas has entrained a large amount of cooler material, and
268: that as the region evolves the mean 
269: temperature will increase as the cool material is blown away.
270:  
271: 
272: 
273: \section{Large-scale Diffuse Emission}
274: 
275: At larger radii, Fig.~2 shows soft diffuse emission
276: without any obvious stellar/optical counterparts (Ponman et al.\ 2003, in preparation).
277: We can identify two components of this emission: (i) two spectacular extended structures,
278: suggesting giant loops or bubbles 
279: of hot plasma (the loops, hereafter), $\sim$10~kpc across, extending South of NGC~4039, and
280: (ii) a low-surface-brightness soft halo 
281: in the region surrounding the stellar disks of the merging galaxies, extending 
282: out to at least 18~kpc ($\sim$200\arcsec) from the nucleus of NGC~4039. The latter
283: is not clearly shown in Figure~2, but is revealed at high significance
284: by comparisons of the radial distribution
285: of the X-ray counts, with those expected from a field background (Fig.~5).
286: 
287: The spectra of the loops can be fitted with a thermal plasma with kT varying
288: between 0.29 keV and 0.34 keV ($1 \sigma$ errors of typically 0.01 to
289: 0.03~keV) and metallicities apparently sub-solar (typically 0.1--0.2 solar).
290: The extent and spectral parameters of the low-surface-brightness halo are
291: uncertain because of the uncertainties of the background subtraction at these
292: large radii. However, the spectra are soft, with nominal
293: $kT=0.23+0.02/-0.01$~(1$\sigma$)~keV, so  
294: this larger-scale emission may be cooler than that of the loops.
295: The best-fit metallicity is only 0.04 solar, and is $<0.13$ at 90\% confidence
296: in the outer annulus. 
297: However, the signal-to-noise ratio of the data is lower than for the hot ISM,
298: and the fits include data from large regions.
299: While we have no reason to believe that the intrinsic spectral parameters
300: vary significantly at these radii, we cannot exclude it either.
301: Hence, these abundances are uncertain.
302: Taken at face value, there is a trend of decreasing abundances going from
303: the hot ISM of the star-forming regions to the loops, and to the larger-scale
304: emission. This trend may be consistent with a picture in which the
305: hot gas in the large-scale halo may  have been diluted with metal-poor
306: ambient ISM. The temperature also seems
307: to decrease at large radii, which may be due to adiabatic expansion.
308: 
309: What causes these large-scale features? The extended halo may be the
310: aftermath of superwinds from The Antennae, perhaps resulting from a
311: starburst at the first-encounter epoch $\sim$(2--5)$\times 10^8$yr ago
312: (Barnes 1988; Mihos et al.\ 1993; Whitmore et al.\ 1999) and the
313: prolonged elevated star-formation rate (4\,--\,6 \msun/yr) of the past
314: $\sim$150 Myr (Mihos, Bothun, \& Richstone 1993, esp.\ Fig.\ 10).
315: The cooling times in these diffuse regions are $\sim$1~Gyr. The thermal
316: energy content of both halo and loops is $\sim$10$^{56}$~erg,
317: comparable to the energy of $10^5$ SNe. Given the age of the
318: starburst of $\sim$10$^8$yr, a SN rate of 0.001 per year could
319: have provided this energy. This is a small fraction of the current
320: SN rate of The Antennae (0.2--0.3~yr$^{-1}$; Neff \& Ulvestad
321: 2000) and, likely, of the average rate during the past $\sim$150 Myr.
322: 
323: A simple order-of-magnitude estimate of the expansion velocity of the loops,
324: assuming a 10~kpc extent and constant velocity over a period of
325: $10^7$\,--\,$10^8$ yr, yields a velocity of 1000--100~km/s.  At least
326: velocities $\ga$300~km/s are likely to exceed the escape velocity of
327: the system and correspond, in fact, to about the mean expansion velocity
328: observed in ultraluminous infrared galaxies (Rupke, Veilleux, \&
329: Sanders 2002).
330: Moreover, these velocities are comparable to or exceed 
331: the sound speed of $\sim$200~km~s$^{-1}$ we derive for this hot gas.
332: Therefore, the loops could be shocked swept-up ISM. 
333: If they are superbubbles
334: blown by a violent localized starburst (e.g., at the nucleus of NGC~4039),
335: as, e.g., in the Tomisaka \& Ikeuchi (1988) model, one would expect more of
336: a bipolar outflow morphology. They could correspond to two separate events,
337: with perhaps the receding
338: sides of the outflows obscured by the main body of the emission from the merger.
339: Another possibility that will need to be explored with hydrodynamical simulations,
340: is that the loops are somehow connected with the merging process, as
341: suggested in the case of Arp~220, where similar structures are observed
342: with {\it Chandra} (McDowell et al.\ 2003). We note that a
343: large-scale ring of hot gaseous emission is present in NGC~5128, a
344: likely merger remnant (Karovska et al.\ 2002). 
345: 
346: Given the long cooling times of both loops and halo in The Antennae, it seems
347: possible that---if these features are bound by a dark massive halo---they
348: may persist after the completion of the merger and the formation
349: of the resulting elliptical galaxy.  Interestingly, the  total mass of hot gas
350: in these extended features is $\sim${}$4 \times 10^8 M_{\odot}$.
351: This mass is comparable with that reported from X-ray observations of 
352: relatively X-ray faint Elliptical and S0 galaxies (e.g., Roberts et al.\ 1991).
353: 
354: 
355: 
356: \section{Conclusions}
357: 
358: The above results demonstrate the power of sensitive, high-resolution X-ray 
359: observations. Thanks to a deep 411~ks observation of The Antennae, we now have 
360: a first picture of the varying chemical enrichment
361: of the ISM, and we can see this hot medium expanding
362: into the intergalactic space and possibly enriching the intergalactic medium
363: with metals. Given the long cooling time of the extended halo, these observations
364: may also show the formation of the hot halo of the elliptical galaxy that will be 
365: created by the merger. These data provide a new, welcome opportunity to witness
366: the chemical evolution of galaxies in action, and offer a nearby glimpse
367: of the distant evolving Universe. 
368: 
369: \acknowledgments
370: 
371:  We thank the CXC DS and SDS teams for their efforts in reducing the data and 
372: developing the software used for the reduction (SDP) and analysis
373: (CIAO). We thank Martin Elvis and Larry David for useful discussions. 
374: This work was supported by NASA contract NAS~8--39073 (CXC)  and NASA
375: Grant G02-3135X.
376: ARK gratefully acknowledges a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award,
377: and FS support from NSF grant AST-02\,05994.
378: 
379: 
380: \begin{thebibliography}{}
381: 
382: \bibitem[]{} Baldi, A. et al.\ 2003, in preparation
383: 
384: \bibitem[Barnes(1988)]{barn88} Barnes, J.\ E. 1988, \apj, 331, 699
385: 
386: \bibitem[]{}Breitschwerdt, D. 2003, RMxAC, 15, 311
387: 
388: \bibitem[Fabbiano et al.\ 2001]{}Fabbiano, G., Zezas, A., \& Murray, S.
389: 2001, \apj, 554, 1035 
390: 
391: \bibitem[Fabbiano \etal\ 2003]{}Fabbiano, G., Zezas, A., King, A. R.,
392: Ponman, T. J., Rots, A., Raymond, J., \& Schweizer, F. 2003a,
393: \apj, 584, L5
394: 
395: \bibitem[]{} Fabbiano, G., King, A. R., Zezas, A., Ponman, T. J., Rots, A., Schweizer, F. 2003b,
396: \apj, 591, 843
397: 
398: \bibitem[]{} Fabbiano, G., Krauss, M., Zezas, A., Rots, A., \& Neff, S. 2003c, \apj, in press
399: 
400: \bibitem[]{} Fabbiano, G. \& Trinchieri, G. 1983, \apj, 266, L5
401: 
402: \bibitem[]{}
403: Gilbert, A.M., 2002, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkely
404: 
405: \bibitem[Hibbard et al 2001]{876} Hibbard, J. E., van der Hulst, J. M.,
406: Barnes, J. E., \& Rich, R. M. 2001, AJ, 122, 2969
407: 
408: \bibitem[Karovska et al 2002]{879} Karovska, M., Fabbiano, G., 
409: Nicastro, F., Elvis, M., Kraft, R. P. \& Murray, S. S.
410: 2002, \apj, 577, 114
411: 
412: \bibitem[]{}Martin, C. L., Kobulnicky, H. A. \& Heckman, T. M. 2002, \apj, 574, 663
413: 
414: %%\bibitem[]{}McDowell, J. C., Clements, D. L., Lamb, S. A., Shaked, S., 
415: %%Hearn, N. C., Colina, L., Mundell, C., Borne, K., Baker, A. C., Arribas, S.
416: %%2003, \apj, 591, 154
417: \bibitem[]{}McDowell, J. C., et al. 2003, \apj, 591, 154
418: 
419: \bibitem[Mihos et al.(1993)]{miho93} Mihos, J.\ C., Bothun, G.\ D., \&
420:    Richstone, D.\ O. 1993, \apj, 418, 82
421: 
422: 
423: \bibitem[]{}Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., \& White, S. D. 1995, \mnras, 275, 56
424: 
425: \bibitem[Neff \& Ulvestad(2000)]{neff00} Neff, S.\ G., \& Ulvestad, J.\ S.
426:    2000, \aj, 120, 670
427: 
428: 
429: \bibitem[]{} Ponman, T. et al.\ 2003, in preparation
430: 
431: \bibitem[]{} Roberts M. S., Hogg, D. E., Bregman, J. N., Forman, W. R., Jones, C. 1991, \apjs, 75, 751
432: 
433: %%\bibitem[Rubin et al 1970]{912} Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., \& D'Odorico, S.
434: %%1970, \apj, 160, 801 
435: 
436: \bibitem[]{} Rupke, D.\ S., Veilleux, S., \& Sanders, D.\ B. 2002, \apj, 570, 588
437: 
438: %\bibitem[Sansom \etal\ 1996]{915} Sansom, A. E., Dotani, T., Okada, K.,
439: %Yamashita, A., \& Fabbiano, G.  1996, \mnras, 281, 48
440: 
441: \bibitem[]{}Smith, R. K., 
442:  Brickhouse, N. S.,
443:  Liedahl, D. A., Raymond, J. C. 2001, \apj, 556, L91
444: 
445: \bibitem[]{} Tomisaka, K. \& Ikeuchi, S. 1988, \apj, 330, 695
446: 
447: 
448: %\bibitem[Weaver et al 2000]{937} Weaver, K. A., Heckman, T. M., \& Dahlem, M. 2000, \apj, 534, 684
449: 
450: \bibitem[Weisskopf \etal\ 2000]{939}Weisskopf, M., Tananbaum, H., Van Speybroeck, L. \& O'Dell, S.
451: 2000, Proc. SPIE 4012, p. 2 (astro-ph 0004127)
452: 
453: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(1999)]{whit99} Whitmore, B.\ C., Zhang, Q.,
454:    Leitherer, C., Fall, S.\ M., Schweizer, F., \& Miller, B.\ W. 1999,
455:    \aj, 118, 1551
456: 
457: 
458: \bibitem[Wilson et al 2000]{952}Wilson, C. D., Scoville, N., Madden, S. C., \& 
459: Charmandaris, V. 2000, \apj, 542, 120
460: 
461: 
462: \bibitem[Zezas \& Fabbiano 2002]{} Zezas, A. \& Fabbiano 2002, \apj, 577, 726
463: 
464: \bibitem[Zezas \etal\ 2001]{} Zezas, A., Fabbiano, G. Rots, A. H., \&
465: Murray, S., 2002a, \apjs, 142, 239
466: 
467: \bibitem[Zezas \etal\ 2001]{} Zezas, A., Fabbiano, G. Rots, A. H., \&
468: Murray, S., 2002b, \apj, 577, 710
469: 
470: \bibitem[]{}Zezas, A. et al.\ 2003, in preparation
471: 
472: \bibitem[Zhang et al 2001]{968}Zhang, Q., Fall, S. M., \& Whitmore, B. C.
473: 2001, \apj, 561, 727
474: 
475: \end{thebibliography}{}
476: 
477: 
478: \clearpage
479: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
480: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
481: \tablecaption{\small Best-fit (68\% errors) and Stellar Parameters for three Regions
482: of the
483: Antennae ISM\label{mytable}}
484: \tablewidth{0pt}
485: \tablehead{
486: \colhead{$Reg.^a$} &
487: \colhead{$\chi^2/dof$} &
488: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
489: N$_H$\\
490: ($10^{21}$cm$^{-2}$)
491: \end{tabular}} &
492: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
493: $kT$\\
494: (keV)
495: \end{tabular}} &
496: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
497: $Z_{Ne}$\\
498: ($Z_{Ne,\odot}$)
499: \end{tabular}} &
500: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
501: $Z_{Mg}$\\
502: ($ Z_{Mg,\odot}$)
503: \end{tabular}} &
504: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
505: $Z_{Si}$\\
506: ($ Z_{Si,\odot}$)
507: \end{tabular}} &
508: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
509: $Z_{Fe}$\\
510: ($ Z_{Fe,\odot}$)
511: \end{tabular}} &
512: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
513: Age\\
514: (Myr)
515: \end{tabular}} &
516: \colhead{\begin{tabular}{c}
517: Rel. \\
518: SFR\end{tabular}}
519: }
520: \startdata
521: R1$^b$&24.6/34&
522: $ 0.18_{-0.18}^{+0.73}$
523: &
524: \begin{tabular}{c}
525: $0.18_{-0.05}^{+0.04}$\\
526: $0.56_{-0.07}^{+0.05}$
527: \end{tabular} 
528: &$0.93_{-0.67}^{+2.02}$&$0.70_{-0.54}^{+0.93}$&$<0.25$&$0.58_{-0.27}^{+0.88}$ 
529: & 4 & 0.4\\
530: R5&31.5/34&$ 0.08_{-0.08}^{+0.23}$&$0.30\pm0.02$&$7.88_{-1.90}^{+1.43}$&$16.91_{-4.25}^{+7.64}$&$23.70_{
531: -10.73}^{+13.38}$&$2.67_{-0.34}^{+1.06}$ & 10.6 & 2.3\\
532: R7&83.2/73&$1.76_{-1.09}^{+0.70}$&$0.50_{-0.10}^{+0.08}$&$3.11_{-1.19}^{+4.15}$&$3.19_{-1.62}^{+4.97}$&
533: $4.40_{-2.41}^{+18.04}$&$0.78_{-0.41}^{+0.59}$ & 4 & 1.0\\
534: \enddata
535: 
536: a) R1 and R7 are representative low and high abundance regions out of 21 regions studied in 
537: detail by Baldi \etal\ (2003).\\
538: R5 is the region with the most extreme high abundances. These regions are identified by `1', `5' 
539: and `7' in fig.~3.
540: 
541: b) Two thermal components are required to fit the R1 data. While R1 consists of two areas, 
542: either one does not 
543: have \\
544: enough counts for a meaningful fit. Both areas have similar X-ray colors, suggesting similar spectra.
545: 
546: 
547: \end{deluxetable}
548: 
549: 
550: 
551: 
552: \setcounter{figure}{0}
553: 
554: 
555: \begin{figure}
556: %%%%\includegraphics[width=14.0cm]{f1.eps}
557: \caption{Coadded astrometry-corrected `raw' data  (0.3-6 keV), together with a
558: representative outline of the optical interacting disks (blue contours),
559: and red contours derived from the {\it Hubble} WFPC-2 H$\alpha$ image
560: (from Whitmore et al.\ 1999), that indicates the position of HII 
561: regions in the Antennae. 
562: }
563: \end{figure}
564: 
565: \begin{figure}
566: %%%%%\begin{tabular}{cc}
567: %%%%%\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[width=18.0cm]{f2.eps}}
568: %%%%%\end{tabular}
569: \caption{Exposure-corrected 
570: adaptively-smoothed true-color image, obtained from data  
571: in the 0.3--0.65 (red), 0.65--1.5 (green) and 1.5--6.0~keV (blue) energy bands.
572: The data processing is similar to that followed in Fabbiano et al.\ (2003c) and is 
573: explained fully in Baldi et al.\ (2003, in preparation). The maximum significance 
574: has been set to 5$\sigma$, while the maximum smoothing 
575: scale corresponds to a minimum significance of 2.4$\sigma$ inside the optical 
576: body of the Antennae in the `green' band. The same smoothing scales (1 - 128 pixels)
577: were applied to the
578: three bands. The color scale
579:  has been stretched to allow the display of both the 
580: large-scale diffuse emission and the luminous, more resolved features.}
581: \end{figure}
582: 
583: \begin{figure}
584: %%%%%\begin{tabular}{cc}
585: %%%%%\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[width=16cm]{f3.eps}} & \\
586: %%%%%\end{tabular}
587: \caption{Metallicity map of the hot ISM of
588: The Antennae, where  red, green, and blue  indicate emission by
589: Fe, Si, and Mg respectively.
590: Continuum was subtracted by estimating the contribution of the overall
591: best-fit two-component thermal bremsstrahlung model in the two  bands 
592:  at 1.4--1.65~keV and 2.05--3.50~keV, where no strong lines are observed.
593:  Point-like sources were excluded, following Fabbiano et al.\ (2003c).
594: The Fe-L band image was
595: adaptively smoothed  to a significance between 3$\sigma$ and
596: 5$\sigma$, and the same scales were applied to the other line images.}
597: \end{figure}
598: 
599: 
600: 
601: \begin{figure}
602: %%%%%\begin{tabular}{cc}
603: %%%%%\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[width=12.0cm, angle=0.]{f4.eps}} & \\
604: %%%%%\end{tabular}
605: \caption{ACIS spectrum of region R5, together with best-fit model and fit residuals.
606: Gain corrections were applied using software provided by the CXC Calibration Group.}
607: \end{figure}
608: 
609: \begin{figure}
610: %%%%%\begin{tabular}{cc}
611: %%%%%\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[width=9.0cm, angle=0.]{f5.eps}} & \\
612: %%%%%\end{tabular}
613: \caption{Surface brightness (0.3 - 1.0 keV, solid line), compared with that of the expexted 
614: field background (dashed)}
615: \end{figure}
616: 
617: 
618: \end{document}
619: 
620: 
621: