1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %========================================================
3: %%
4: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
5: %%
6: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
7: %%
8: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
9: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
10:
11: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
12: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
13: %% any data that comes before this command.
14:
15: %% The command below calls the preprint style
16: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
17: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
18: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
19:
20: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27:
28: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
29:
30: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
31: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
32: %% the \begin{document} command.
33: %%
34: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
35: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
36: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
37: %% for information.
38:
39: % \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
40: % \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
41:
42: \newcommand{\ld}{\lambda/D}
43:
44: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
45: \newtheorem{proof}{Proof}
46:
47: %\let\DOTSI\relax
48: %\def\@cdots{\mathinner{\cdotp\cdotp\cdotp}}
49: %\newcommand{\dotsi}{\!\@cdots}
50: %\def\intkern@{\mkern-6mu\mathchoice{\mkern-3mu}{}{}{}}
51: %\def\intdots@{\mathchoice{\@cdots}%
52: % {{\cdotp}\mkern1.5mu{\cdotp}\mkern1.5mu{\cdotp}}%
53: % {{\cdotp}\mkern1mu{\cdotp}\mkern1mu{\cdotp}}%
54: % {{\cdotp}\mkern1mu{\cdotp}\mkern1mu{\cdotp}}}
55: %\newcommand{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
56: %\newcommand{\iiint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{3}}
57: %\newcommand{\iiiint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{4}}
58: %\newcommand{\idotsint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{0}}
59: %\newcommand{\MultiIntegral}[1]{%
60: % \edef\ints@c{\noexpand\intop
61: % \ifnum#1=\z@\noexpand\intdots@\else\noexpand\intkern@\fi
62: % \ifnum#1>\tw@\noexpand\intop\noexpand\intkern@\fi
63: % \ifnum#1>\thr@@\noexpand\intop\noexpand\intkern@\fi
64: % \noexpand\intop
65: % \noexpand\ilimits@
66: % }%
67: % \futurelet\@let@token\ints@a
68: %}
69: %\def\ints@a{%
70: % \ifx\limits\@let@token \ints@b
71: % \else \ifx\displaylimits\@let@token \ints@b
72: % \else\ifx\ilimits@\displaylimits \ints@b
73: % \fi\fi\fi
74: % \ints@c
75: %}
76: %\def\ints@b{%
77: % \mkern-7mu\mathchoice{\mkern-2mu}{}{}{}%
78: % \mathop\bgroup
79: % \mkern7mu\mathchoice{\mkern2mu}{}{}{}%
80: % \let\ilimits@\egroup
81: %}%
82: \usepackage[intlimits]{amsmath}
83: \usepackage{times}
84:
85: \newcommand{\refeqn}[1]{Eq. (\ref{#1})}
86: \newcommand{\reffig}[1]{Fig. \ref{#1}}
87: \newcommand{\sinc}{{\text{sinc}}}
88: \newcommand{\R}{{\mathbb R}}
89: \newcommand{\half}{\frac{1}{2}}
90: %\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
91:
92: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
93:
94: % \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
95:
96: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
97: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
98: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
99: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
100: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
101: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
102:
103: \shorttitle{Rectangular Masks}
104: \shortauthors{Vanderbei et al.}
105:
106: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
107: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
108:
109: %\received{2002 December 29}
110: %\received{2003 May 3}
111: \begin{document}
112:
113: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
114: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
115: %% you desire.
116:
117: \title{Rectangular-Mask Coronagraphs for High-Contrast Imaging}
118:
119: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
120: %% author and affiliation information.
121: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
122: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
123: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
124: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
125:
126: \author{Robert J. Vanderbei}
127: \affil{Operations Research and Financial Engineering,
128: Princeton University}%, Princeton, NJ 08544}
129: \email{rvdb@princeton.edu}
130:
131: \author{N. Jeremy Kasdin}
132: \affil{Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
133: Princeton University}%, Princeton, NJ 08544}
134: \email{jkasdin@princeton.edu}
135:
136: \author{David N. Spergel}
137: \affil{Astrophysics,
138: Princeton University}%, Princeton, NJ 08544}
139: \email{dns@princeton.edu}
140:
141: %\author{et al.}
142: %\affil{from various departments and universities}
143: %\email{tpf@princeton.edu}
144:
145: %\author{David N. Spergel}
146: %\affil{Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University}%, Princeton, NJ 08544}
147: %\email{dns@astro.princeton.edu}
148: %
149: %\and
150: %
151: %\author{N. Jeremy Kasdin}
152: %\affil{Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University}%, Princeton, NJ 08544}
153: %\email{jkasdin@princeton.edu}
154:
155: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
156: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
157: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
158: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
159: %% editorial office after submission.
160:
161: \begin{abstract}
162: We present yet another new family of masks for high-contrast imaging
163: as required for the to-be-built terrestrial planet finder space telescope.
164: The ``best'' design
165: involves a square entrance pupil having a 4-vane spider, a square
166: image-plane mask containing a plus-sign shaped occulter to block the starlight
167: inside $0.6 \lambda/D$, and a Lyot-plane mask consisting of a rectangular
168: array of rectangular opennings. Using Fraunhofer analysis, we show that
169: the optical system can image a planet
170: $10^{-10}$ times as bright as an on-axis star in four rectangular
171: regions given by $\{ (\xi,\zeta): 1.4 < | \xi | < 20, 1.4 < | \zeta | < 20 \}$.
172:
173: Since the design involves an image plane mask, pointing error is an issue.
174: We show that the design can tolerate pointing errors of about $0.05
175: \lambda/D$.
176:
177: The inclusion of a 4-vane spider in the entrance pupil provides the
178: possibility to build a mirror-only on-axis system thereby
179: greatly reducing the negative effects of polarization.
180:
181: Each of the masks can be realized as two masks consisting of stripes
182: of opaque material with the stripes oriented at right angles to each other.
183: We call these striped masks {\em barcode} masks. We show that it is
184: sufficient for the barcode masks by themselves to provide $10^{-5}$
185: contrast. This then guarantees that the full system will provide the
186: required $10^{-10}$ contrast.
187:
188: The rectangular Lyot-plane mask can be viewed as a binary-mask extension of
189: Nisenson's apodized square aperture concept.
190: \end{abstract}
191: \keywords{planetary systems --- instrumentation: miscellaneous}
192:
193:
194: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
195: %\keywords{planetary systems --- instrumentation: miscellaneous}
196:
197: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
198: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
199: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
200:
201: %\keywords{Extrasolar planets, coronagraphy, Fraunhaufer optics, Hankel
202: %transform, point spread function, apodization}
203:
204: \section{Introduction}
205: \label{sec:intro}
206: Following our previous work on pupil-plane masks for high-contrast imaging
207: in the context of terrestrial planet finding
208: (see \cite{KVSL02,VSK02,VSK03}),
209: we present in this paper further new pupil masks as well as some
210: pupil-plane/image-plane combinations of masks.
211: Most of our earlier pupil-plane mask designs have an inner working angle
212: ({\em IWA})
213: of $4 \lambda/D$, which implies a main mirror in the $12$ m range.
214: One of the main objectives leading to the designs presented in this
215: paper was to significantly decrease this inner working angle.
216: If the inner working angle can be reduced to $2 \lambda/D$, then
217: the main mirror can be dropped down to the $6$ m range and still
218: be capable of studying the same set of stars. This is our goal.
219:
220: The simplest, but not best, pupil mask presented here
221: achieves a contrast ratio of $10^{-10}$ in four rectangular
222: regions given by $\{ (\xi,\zeta): 2 < | \xi | < 20, 2 < | \zeta | < 20 \}$.
223: The points of high-contrast that are closest to the center of the star's image
224: occur along the diagonals and therefore correspond
225: to an inner working angle
226: of $2\sqrt{2} = 2.8 \lambda/D$ (as
227: usual, $\lambda$ is wavelength and $D$ is aperture).
228:
229: The masks considered in this paper consist of rectangular arrays of
230: rectangular
231: opennings. They can be built as two identical striped masks one placed
232: on top of the other but oriented so that the stripes on one mask are orthogonal
233: to the stripes on the other (see Figure \ref{fig1}).
234: We call the striped masks {\em barcode} masks.
235: Each barcode mask need only
236: provide a contrast ratio of $10^{-5}$---it is then guaranteed that the
237: two-mask overlay will achieve a contrast of $10^{-10}$.
238: This is important since it is quite feasible to
239: check in a laboratory that a barcode mask achieves $10^{-5}$
240: but is perhaps impossible to check that a mask achieves $10^{-10}$ in any
241: ground-based laboratory.
242:
243: Furthermore, we show that one can get an even tighter IWA of
244: $1.4\sqrt{2} = 2.0 \lambda/D$ by placing a rectangular pupil-plane mask
245: in the Lyot plane of a traditional coronagraph and using an image-plane
246: occulting mask consisting of a ``plus-sign'' shape,
247: $\{ (\xi,\zeta): \; | \xi | < 0.6, \; | \zeta | < 0.6 \}$.
248: %
249: %Furthermore, we show that one can design such a rectangular pupil-plane mask
250: %such that if placed
251: %in the Lyot plane of a traditional coronagraph and used in conjunction with an
252: %image-plane occulting mask consisting of a ``plus-sign'' shape,
253: %$\{ (\xi,\zeta): \; | \xi | < 0.6, \; | \zeta | < 0.6 \}$, it is then
254: %possible to reduce the IWA to $1.4\sqrt{2} = 2.0 \lambda/D$.
255: %
256: We show that such a coronagraph can tolerate pointing errors as large
257: as about $0.05 \lambda/D$.
258:
259: Finally, in the interest of producing an on-axis coronagraph, we present a
260: Lyot-plane rectangular pupil mask which includes a $2\%$ 4-vane spider.
261: A similar spider can then be placed in the entrance pupil and provide the
262: opportunity to place a small secondary mirror at the center of the plane.
263: Having such a spider over the entrance pupil provides the possibility of
264: building an all-mirror on-axis system and in this way greatly reducing the
265: negative effects of differential polarization that plague off-axis designs.
266:
267: \section{Barcode and Rectangular Pupil Masks} \label{sec:barcode}
268:
269: In this paper we assume that telescope optics follow the Fraunhofer
270: approximation. Hence,
271: given a pupil plane apodization function $0 \le A(x,y) \le 1$,
272: the image-plane electric
273: field is given by the two-dimensional Fourier transform
274: \begin{equation} \label{1}
275: E(\xi,\zeta) = \widehat{A}(\xi,\zeta)
276: := \iint e^{2 \pi i (\xi x + \zeta y)} A(x,y) dy dx.
277: \end{equation}
278: If the apodization function takes only the values zero and one, then the
279: function represents a {\em mask}. If it depends only on one of the
280: coordinates (either $x$ or $y$), then we say that it is a
281: {\em one-dimensional apodization} or a {\em one-dimensional mask}.
282: We also refer to one-dimensional masks as {\em barcode} masks.
283: This family of masks were studied in \citet{KVLS04}.
284: In this paper, we are interested
285: in masks that correspond to the tensor product of a pair of one-dimensional
286: masks:
287: \begin{equation} \label{2}
288: A = A_x \otimes A_y \qquad \Leftrightarrow \qquad A(x,y) = A_x(x) A_y(y) .
289: \end{equation}
290: The electric field corresponding to a tensor product is itself a
291: tensor product:
292: \begin{equation} \label{3}
293: E = \widehat{A} = \widehat{A_x \otimes A_y}
294: = \widehat{A_x} \otimes \widehat{A_y} .
295: \end{equation}
296: In other words,
297: \begin{equation} \label{4}
298: E(\xi, \zeta) = \widehat{A_x}(\xi) \widehat{A_y}(\zeta) .
299: \end{equation}
300: Tensor products of smooth apodizations were first proposed for terrestrial
301: planet finding in \cite{ref:Nisenson}.
302:
303: Since intensity is the square of the magnitude of the electric field, it follows
304: that for a contrast of $10^{-10}$, we seek apodization functions that provide
305: the following contrast inequalities:
306: \begin{equation} \label{5}
307: |E(\xi, \zeta)| \le 10^{-5} E(0,0), \qquad (\xi, \zeta) \in {\cal O},
308: \end{equation}
309: where ${\cal O}$ denotes the points in the image plane at which high contrast
310: is to be achieved. Suppose as before that the apodization function is a
311: tensor product. If the set ${\cal O}$ is a {\em generalized rectangle}
312: \begin{equation} \label{6}
313: {\cal O} = \{ (\xi, \zeta) : \; \xi \in {\cal O}_{\xi},
314: \; \zeta \in {\cal O}_{\zeta} \}
315: \end{equation}
316: (i.e., ${\cal O} = {\cal O}_{\xi} \times {\cal O}_{\zeta}$), then the contrast
317: inequalities can be achieved by giving two one-dimensional apodizations
318: that each achieve a contrast ratio of only $10^{-5}$:
319: \begin{eqnarray} \label{7}
320: |\widehat{A_x}(\xi )| & \le & 10^{-2.5} \widehat{A_x}(0),
321: \qquad \xi \in {\cal O}_{\xi},
322: \\
323: |\widehat{A_y}(\zeta)| & \le & 10^{-2.5} \widehat{A_y}(0),
324: \qquad \zeta \in {\cal O}_{\zeta}.
325: \end{eqnarray}
326:
327: Figure \ref{fig1} shows a rectangular mask corresponding to
328: ${\cal O}_{\xi} = {\cal O}_{\zeta} = \{ \xi : 2 \le | \xi | \le 25 \}$.
329: The mask has a $28.1\%$ open area. Its {\em Airy throughput},
330: defined as
331: \begin{equation} \label{8}
332: \int_{-\xi_0}^{\xi_0} \int_{-\xi_0}^{\xi_0}
333: | E(\xi, \zeta) |^2 d\zeta d\xi,
334: \end{equation}
335: where $\xi_0$ denotes the inner working angle for the barcode mask,
336: is $15.1\%$.
337:
338: Figure \ref{fig2} shows another rectangular mask. For this mask,
339: a $2\%$ central obstruction was imposed on the design. With such
340: a central obstruction (and implied spiders) one can hang and hide
341: a small secondary mirror and therefore build a telescope with an
342: on-axis optical path. In this design, we have used
343: ${\cal O}_{\xi} = {\cal O}_{\zeta} = \{ \xi : 2 \le | \xi | \le 22 \}$.
344: The mask has a $4.6\%$ open area. Its {\em Airy throughput},
345: is $0.41\%$, which is somewhat disappointing. In the Section \ref{sec4},
346: we present an on-axis design that achieves a much higher throughput.
347:
348: We end this section by point out that PSFs associated with these masks
349: depend on wavelength only in that the inner working angle is measured
350: in units of $\lambda/D$, where $\lambda$ is wavelength and $D$ is aperture.
351: Hence, measured in radians, at longer wavelengths the inner working angle
352: is correspondingly larger.
353:
354: \section{A Lyot Coronagraph}
355:
356: Consider an imaging system consisting of an entrance pupil,
357: a first image plane, a reimaged (Lyot) pupil plane, and a final
358: image plane (containing an imaging device). We assume that
359: each of the first three planes can be apodized/masked.
360: Following \cite{ref:kuchner}, we let $A$ denote
361: the mask function for the entrance pupil, $\hat{M}$
362: the mask function for the first image plane, and $L$
363: the mask function for the Lyot pupil.
364:
365: The electric field at point $(\xi,\zeta)$
366: in the final image plane corresponding to an off-axis point source
367: is a composition of mask multiplication and Fourier transform:
368: \begin{equation} \label{10}
369: {\cal F} \left( L \cdot
370: {\cal F} \left( \widehat{M} \cdot
371: {\cal F} \left( A \cdot F_{-\xi_0,-\zeta_0} \right)
372: \right)
373: \right)(\xi, \zeta)
374: =
375: \widehat{L}*
376: \left( \widehat{M} \cdot (\widehat{A} * \delta_{\xi_0,\zeta_0}) \right)
377: (\xi, \zeta)
378: ,
379: \end{equation}
380: where
381: $ F_{-\xi_0,-\zeta_0} $ denotes the electric field at the entrance pupil
382: corresponding to a point source from direction $(\xi_0,\zeta_0)$,
383: $\delta_{\xi_0,\zeta_0}$ denotes a unit mass delta function at
384: $(\xi_0,\zeta_0)$, hats denote Fourier transforms and stars denote
385: convolutions.
386:
387: It is easy to see that if each of $L$, $M$, and $A$ are tensor products
388: ($L = L_x \otimes L_y$, $M = M_x \otimes M_y$, $A = A_x \otimes A_y$),
389: then the electric field again factors into a product of electric fields:
390: \begin{equation} \label{12}
391: \widehat{L}*
392: \left( \widehat{M} \cdot (\widehat{A} * \delta_{\xi_0,\zeta_0}) \right)
393: (\xi, \zeta)
394: =
395: \widehat{L_x}*
396: \left( \widehat{M_x} \cdot (\widehat{A_x} * \delta_{\xi_0}) \right)
397: (\xi)
398: \quad
399: \widehat{L_y}*
400: \left( \widehat{M_y} \cdot (\widehat{A_y} * \delta_{\zeta_0}) \right)
401: (\zeta)
402: \end{equation}
403: We use this factorization to greatly simplify the coronagraph
404: optimization problems described in the next section.
405:
406: \section{Lyot Coronagraph Optimization Problem and Numerical Results}
407: \label{sec4}
408:
409: As in our previous papers (\cite{KVSL02,VSK02,VSK03}),
410: we use numerical optimization to maximize
411: some measure $\theta$ of throughput subject to imposed contrast constraints.
412: For the designs presented in this section, we solve the following
413: one-dimensional barcode optimization problem:
414:
415: \begin{equation} \label{9}
416: \begin{array}{rrlll}
417: \text{maximize } & \theta \\[0.2in]
418: \text{subject to } &
419: \theta
420: & \le
421: \widehat{L}*
422: \left( \widehat{M} \cdot (\widehat{A} * \delta_{\xi,\zeta}) \right)
423: (\xi,\zeta),
424: & \quad (\xi,\zeta) \in {\cal O},
425: \\[0.2in]
426: &
427: \left|
428: \widehat{L}*
429: \left( \widehat{M} \cdot (\widehat{A} * \delta_{0}) \right) (\xi,\zeta)
430: \right|
431: & \le
432: \displaystyle
433: \frac{
434: \widehat{L}*
435: \left( \widehat{M} \cdot (\widehat{A} * \delta_{\xi,\zeta}) \right) (\xi,\zeta)
436: }{
437: 10^{2.5}
438: },
439: & \quad (\xi,\zeta) \in {\cal O}.
440: \end{array}
441: \end{equation}
442: %
443: The first set of constraints say that $\theta$ is a lower bound on the
444: electric field of a unit off-axis source (i.e, a planet as bright as a star)
445: as the off-axis source varies over the high-contrast region.
446: The second set of constraints say that the magnitude of the
447: electric field at $\xi \in {\cal O}$ due to an
448: on-axis star is smaller than the electric field at the same point in the image
449: plane due to a much fainter planet whose image is centered at this point $\xi$.
450: The functions $L$, $M$, and $A$ are functions of a single real variable
451: and represent either the $x$ or the $y$ component of a tensor product that one
452: forms to make the final two dimensional image.
453: By specifying prescribed functions for $A$ and $M$ (actually, $\widehat{M}$)
454: we can optimize only the function $L$. In this case, the problem is an
455: infinite dimensional linear programming problem. Discretizing the image
456: and pupil planes reduces the problem to a finite dimensional linear
457: programming problem that can be solved numerically.
458:
459: We now give two specific examples of Lyot coronagraphs.
460: For the first example, we specify that
461: \begin{eqnarray}
462: \label{13}
463: A(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
464: 1 & |x| \le \half \\
465: 0 & \text{otherwise}
466: \end{array} \right.
467: \\[0.1in]
468: \label{14}
469: \widehat{M}(\xi) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
470: 1 & 0.6 \le | \xi | \le 84 \\
471: 0 & \text{otherwise}
472: \end{array} \right.
473: \\[0.1in]
474: \label{18}
475: |L(x)| \quad \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
476: \le 1 & |x| \le \half \\
477: = 0 & \text{otherwise}
478: \end{array} \right.
479: \\[0.1in]
480: \label{15}
481: {\mathcal O} = \{ \xi : 1.4 \le | \xi | \le 21 \}
482: \end{eqnarray}
483: The optimal barcode mask is shown in Figure \ref{fig3} together with
484: the corresponding rectangular mask.
485:
486: The second example is the same as the first except that we impose
487: a central obstruction in the pupil-plane masks:
488: \begin{eqnarray} \label{16}
489: A(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
490: 1 & 0.01 \le |x| \le \half \\
491: 0 & \text{otherwise}
492: \end{array} \right.
493: \\[0.1in]
494: \label{17}
495: |L(x)| \quad \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
496: \le 1 & 0.01 \le |x| \le \half \\
497: = 0 & \text{otherwise}
498: \end{array} \right.
499: \end{eqnarray}
500: The optimal barcode mask is shown in Figure \ref{fig4} together with
501: the corresponding rectangular mask.
502:
503: Since the designs presented in this section involve an image plane mask,
504: the associated PSFs depend on wavelength in a more complicated way than the
505: designs given in Section \ref{sec:barcode}. In fact, as Figure \ref{fig5}
506: shows, the loss of contrast occurs at wavelengths shorter than about $90\%$
507: and longer than $105\%$ of the design point.
508:
509: \section{Conclusions}
510: \label{sec5}
511:
512: In this paper we have presented some new masks for high-contrast imaging.
513: The best design
514: \begin{enumerate}
515: \item achieves an inner working angle of $2.0 \lambda/D$ along
516: the four diagonal directions,
517: \item includes a four-vane spider so that it can be used in an on-axis
518: telescope design, and
519: \item consists of two orthogonally oriented barcode masks each one, by
520: itself, being designed to provide only $10^{-5}$ level of contrast.
521: \end{enumerate}
522: We include an analysis of the effects of pointing error and chromaticity.
523:
524: %\acknowledgements
525: {\bf Acknowledgements.}
526: We are grateful for the continuing support we have received for this work
527: from NASA and JPL.
528: %This work was partially performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
529: %Institute of Technology,
530: %sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as part of
531: %the TPF architecture studies and also under contract number 1240729.
532: The first author also wishes to acknowledge support from the
533: NSF (CCR-0098040) and the ONR (N00014-98-1-0036).
534:
535: \bibliography{../lib/refs} %>>>> bibliography data
536: \bibliographystyle{plainnat} %>>>> makes bibtex use natbib.bst
537:
538: \clearpage
539:
540: \begin{figure}
541: \begin{center}
542: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to25/mask1.pdf}
543: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f1a}
544: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to25/psf1.pdf}
545: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f1b}
546: \\
547: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to25/mask2.pdf}
548: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f1c}
549: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to25/psf2.pdf}
550: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f1d}
551: \end{center}
552: \caption{
553: The open area of the rectangular mask is $28.1\%$ % 0.5297^2
554: and the Airy throughput is $15.1\%$. % 0.3886^2
555: {\em Top left.} A barcode mask designed to provide $10^{-5}$ contrast from
556: $2 \lambda/D$ to $25 \lambda/D$.
557: {\em Top right.} The PSF associated with the barcode mask.
558: {\em Bottom left.} The corresponding rectangular mask.
559: {\em Bottom right.} The PSF corresponding to the rectangular mask.
560: The gray-scale represents a logarithmic stretch with black
561: corresponding to $10^{-10}$ and white corresponding to $1$.
562: }
563: \label{fig1}
564: \end{figure}
565:
566: \begin{figure}
567: \begin{center}
568: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to22co/mask1.pdf}
569: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f2a}
570: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to22co/psf1.pdf}
571: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f2b}
572: \\
573: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to22co/mask2.pdf}
574: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f2c}
575: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/spiders/1d/2to22co/psf2.pdf}
576: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f2d}
577: \end{center}
578: \caption{
579: This design includes a $2\%$ central stripe to hang/hide a secondary
580: mirror.
581: The open area of the rectangular mask is $4.6\%$ % 0.21369^2
582: and the Airy throughput is $0.41\%$. % 0.06419^2
583: {\em Top left.} A barcode mask designed to provide $10^{-5}$ contrast from
584: $2 \lambda/D$ to $22 \lambda/D$.
585: {\em Top right.} The PSF associated with the barcode mask.
586: {\em Bottom left.} The corresponding rectangular mask.
587: {\em Bottom right.} The PSF corresponding to the rectangular mask.
588: The gray-scale represents a logarithmic stretch with black
589: corresponding to $10^{-10}$ and white corresponding to $1$.
590: }
591: \label{fig2}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594: \begin{figure}
595: \begin{center}
596: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/mask1.pdf}
597: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3a}
598: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/mask2.pdf}
599: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3b}
600: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/image_err0.pdf}
601: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3c}
602: \\
603: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/image_err1.pdf}
604: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3d}
605: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/image_err2.pdf}
606: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3e}
607: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21/image_err3.pdf}
608: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f3f}
609: \end{center}
610: \caption{
611: A simulated 3-planet star system as it would appear in a Lyot-style
612: coronagraph in which the entrance pupil is an open square,
613: the first image
614: plane has a ``plus'' shaped occulter of half-width $0.6 \lambda/D$, and a
615: rectangular mask in the Lyot plane.
616: {\em Top left.} A barcode mask designed to provide $10^{-5}$ contrast from
617: $1.4 \lambda/D$ to $21 \lambda/D$ when used in conjunction with the
618: image-plane occulter.
619: {\em Top middle.} The corresponding rectangular mask.
620: The Airy throughput for this mask is $6.2\%$. % 0.24785^2
621: {\em Top right.} The simulated image.
622: The planet in the upper right quadrant is
623: located at $(1.7,1.7)$ and is $10^{-8}$ times as bright as the star.
624: The planet in the upper left quadrant is
625: located at $(-5.1,3.4)$ and is $10^{-9}$ times as bright as the star.
626: The planet in the lower left quadrant is
627: located at $(-6.8,-6.8)$ and is $3 \times 10^{-10}$ times as bright as the star.
628: The gray-scale image is logarithmically stretched to highlight the faint
629: planets.
630: {\em Bottom.} The effect of pointing error. From left to right, the pointing
631: error is $0.048$, $0.096$, and $0.144$. The direction of the error is along
632: the diagonal into the first quadrant.
633: }
634: \label{fig3}
635: \end{figure}
636:
637: \begin{figure}
638: \begin{center}
639: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/mask1.pdf}
640: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4a}
641: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/mask2.pdf}
642: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4b}
643: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err0.pdf}
644: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4c}
645: \\
646: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err1.pdf}
647: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4d}
648: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err2.pdf}
649: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4e}
650: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err3.pdf}
651: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f4f}
652: \end{center}
653: \caption{
654: A simulated 3-planet star system as it would appear in a Lyot-style
655: coronagraph in which the entrance pupil is an open square with a plus-sign
656: spider, the first image
657: plane has a ``plus'' shaped occulter of half-width $0.6 \lambda/D$, and a
658: rectangular mask in the Lyot plane.
659: This design includes a $2\%$ central obstruction.
660: {\em Top left.} A barcode mask designed to provide $10^{-5}$ contrast from
661: $1.4 \lambda/D$ to $21 \lambda/D$ when used in conjunction with the
662: image-plane occulter.
663: {\em Top middle.} The corresponding rectangular mask.
664: The Airy throughput for this mask is $3.5\%$. % 0.18666
665: {\em Top right.} The simulated image.
666: The planet in the upper right quadrant is
667: located at $(1.7,1.7)$ and is $10^{-8}$ times as bright as the star.
668: The planet in the upper left quadrant is
669: located at $(-5.1,3.4)$ and is $10^{-9}$ times as bright as the star.
670: The planet in the lower left quadrant is
671: located at $(-6.8,-6.8)$ and is $3 \times 10^{-10}$ times as bright as the star.
672: The gray-scale image is logarithmically stretched to highlight the faint
673: planets.
674: {\em Bottom.} The effect of pointing error. From left to right, the pointing
675: error is $0.048$, $0.096$, and $0.144$. The direction of the error is along
676: the diagonal into the first quadrant.
677: }
678: \label{fig4}
679: \end{figure}
680:
681: \begin{figure}
682: \begin{center}
683: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err0_0_85.pdf}
684: \includegraphics[width=1.5in]{f5a}
685: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err0_0_90.pdf}
686: \includegraphics[width=1.5in]{f5b}
687: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err0_1_05.pdf}
688: \includegraphics[width=1.5in]{f5c}
689: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co3/image_err0_1_10.pdf}
690: \includegraphics[width=1.5in]{f5d}
691: \end{center}
692: \caption{
693: The simulated 3-planet star system as it would appear in the Lyot-style
694: coronagraph of Figure \ref{fig4} imaged at wavelengths shorter and longer than
695: the design point. From left to right, the wavelengths are $85\%$, $90\%$,
696: $105\%$ and $110\%$ of the wavelength for which the system was designed.
697: }
698: \label{fig5}
699: \end{figure}
700:
701: %\begin{figure}
702: %\begin{center}
703: %%\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co/mask2.pdf}
704: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f4a}
705: %\\
706: %%\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co/image_wide.pdf}
707: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f4b}
708: %%\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{C:/user/rvdb/public_html/JAVA/tpf/amlsystem/12/2to21co/image_narrow.pdf}
709: %\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f4c}
710: %\end{center}
711: %\caption{
712: %A simulated 3-planet star system as it would appear in a Lyot-style
713: %coronagraph in which the entrance pupil is an open square, the first image
714: %plane has a ``plus'' shaped occulter of half-width $0.6 \lambda/D$, and a
715: %rectangular mask in the Lyot plane.
716: %This design includes a $2\%$ central obstruction.
717: %{\em Top.} A rectangular mask designed to provide $10^{-10}$ contrast from
718: %$1.4 \lambda/D$ to $21 \lambda/D$ when used in conjunction with the
719: %image-plane occulter.
720: %{\em Bottom Left.} The simulated image. The image covers from $-84 \lambda/D$
721: %to $84 \lambda/D$ in each direction.
722: %{\em Bottom Right.} A 10x magnification of the center of the image.
723: %The planet in the upper right quadrant is
724: %located at $(1.7,1.7)$ and is $10^{-9}$ times as bright as the star.
725: %The planet in the upper left quadrant is
726: %located at $(-5.1,3.4)$ and is $10^{-8}$ times as bright as the star.
727: %The planet in the lower left quadrant is
728: %located at $(-6.8,-6.8)$ and is $3 \times 10^{-10}$ times as bright as the star.
729: %The gray-scale image is logarithmically stretched to highlight the faint
730: %planets.
731: %}
732: %\label{fig4}
733: %\end{figure}
734:
735: \clearpage
736:
737: %\begin{table}
738: %\centering
739: %\begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|c||c|c|c||} \tableline
740: %\emph{} & Smooth? & \emph{$\rhonaught$} & \emph{$\rhoone$} &
741: % \emph{${\mathcal T}_{\rm{total}}$} &
742: % \emph{${\mathcal T}_{\rm{Airy}}$} &
743: % \emph{$E(0)$}
744: % \\
745: %\tableline
746: %Figure \ref{fig:fig10} & No & 4 & 60 & 17.9\pz & 9.37 & 17.9\pz \\
747: %Figure \ref{fig:fig7} & Yes & 4 & 60 & 9.12 & 9.09 & 17.39 \\
748: %Figure \ref{fig:fig4} & Yes & 3 & 4.25 & 7.7\pz & 7.6\pz & 20.0\pz \\
749: %Figure \ref{fig:fig5} & Yes & 4 & 60 & 8.34 & 8.34 & 15.94 \\
750: %\tableline
751: %\end{tabular}
752: %\caption{Summary of the throughput results for the specific apodizations
753: %considered.}
754: %\label{tbl1}
755: %\end{table}
756: %\clearpage
757:
758: \end{document}
759: