1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
29: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
30: %% the \begin{document} command.
31: %%
32: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
33: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
34: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
35: %% for information.
36:
37: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
38: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
39:
40: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
41:
42: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
43:
44: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
45: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
46: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
47: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
48: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
49: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
50:
51: \shorttitle{Putative Pulsar in SN1987A}
52: \shortauthors{\"Ogelman \& Alpar}
53:
54: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
55: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
60: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
61: %% you desire.
62:
63: \title{Constraints on a putative pulsar in SN1987A}
64:
65: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
66: %% author and affiliation information.
67: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
68: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
69: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
70: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
71:
72: \author{H. \"{O}gelman\altaffilmark{1,2}}
73: %\affil{Department of Physics , University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706}
74: \email{ogelman@cow.physics.wisc.edu}
75:
76:
77:
78: \author{M. A. Alpar\altaffilmark{2}}
79: %\affil{Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanc{\i} University, Orhanl{\i}-Tuzla, Istanbul 34956, Turkey}
80: \email{alpar@sabanciuniv.edu}
81:
82:
83: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
84: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
85: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
86: %% affiliation.
87:
88: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics , University of Wisconsin at Madison, 2531 Sterling Hall, Madison, WI 53706}
89: \altaffiltext{2}{Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanc{\i} University, Orhanl{\i}-Tuzla, Istanbul 34956, Turkey}
90:
91:
92:
93: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
94: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
95: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
96: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
97: %% editorial office after submission.
98:
99: \begin{abstract}
100: We assume that all the energy loss of the putative pulsar in SN 1987A would contribute to the luminosity of the remnant, which acts like a bolometer. The bolometric luminosity of SN 1987A provides an upper bound on the pulsar's rate of energy loss. An isolated pulsar spinning down by magnetic dipole radiation alone, with initial rotation periods of 10-30 ms, as extrapolated for galactic young pulsars, can have a luminosity below the bolometric bound if either the magnetic field is weak, B $\sim$ 10$^{9}$-10$^{10}$ G or if it is so strong that the pulsar luminosity decays rapidly,
101: B $\sim$10$^{16}$ G.
102: \end{abstract}
103:
104: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
105: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
106: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
107: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
108:
109: \keywords{neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, SN1987A}
110:
111: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
112: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
113: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
114: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
115: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
116: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
117: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
118: %% each reference.
119:
120: \section{Introduction}
121:
122: The observed Balmer absorption lines class SN 1987A as a Type II supernova. The identification
123: of the pre-supernova star, the neutrino flux detected at the time of the explosion, the
124: evolution of the optical light curve and the observations of the emission of soft $\gamma$
125: rays all confirm this classification. Therefore, it is expected that a neutron star lies at
126: the center of the remnant. Simulations of the neutrino output in core collapse leading to
127: a black hole differ strongly from the Kamiokande neutrino detections, which agree with
128: several neutron star models (Burrows 1988). Any detection of a neutron star formed in
129: SN1987A would arouse great interest since the properties of very young neutron stars
130: are largely unknown. Searches for pulsed emission from the remnant have yielded no
131: results (\"{O}gelman et al. 1990). A claimed pulsar period of 2.14 ms has been discussed by Middleditch et al (2000).
132: A synchrotron nebula would indicate a young
133: pulsar even if its beam does not sweep our direction so that a pulsed signal is
134: not received. No synchrotron nebula has been detected in the remnant of SN 1987A,
135: with a Chandra upper limit of 5.5 $\times$ 10$^{33}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ to the luminosity
136: of a central X-ray source (Park et al. 2003).
137:
138: The newborn neutron star is characterized by its initial rotation rate and magnetic dipole
139: moment. It will spin down, generating radiation and accelerating charged particles at the
140: expense of its rotational energy. The power output of the neutron star is the luminosity
141: of a rotating dipole, regardless of the detailed processes by which the dipole emission
142: is converted to the energy of charged particle acceleration and high-enegy electromagnetic
143: radiation. The remnant is optically thick to the radiation emitted by the young pulsar.
144: Thus, the remnant will act as a bolometer, absorbing and reprocessing the pulsar luminosity.
145: Most of the remnant's central luminosity is in the optical, IR and UV bands, exceeding
146: its X-ray luminosity by several orders of magnitude. The observed bolometric luminosity
147: of the remnant is dominated and well fitted with the radioactive decay luminosity, so the
148: contribution from the pulsar must be a small admixture. We shall assume that the pulsar loses
149: energy as an isolated rotating dipole, of constant magnetic dipole moment, without any
150: other torques (as would arise, for example, from the presence of a fallback disk).
151: We use the bolometric luminosity to place bounds on the dipole emission of the
152: putative pulsar and on its birth properties.
153:
154: \section{Estimation of the pulsar's birth properties}
155:
156: The spindown of the pulsar by dipole radiation follows from
157: \begin{equation}
158: I \Omega \dot{\Omega} = L_{dip} = \frac{2 \mu^2 \Omega^4}{3 c^3}
159: \end{equation}
160: where I is the moment of inertia of the neutron star, $\Omega$ is the star's rotation
161: rate and $\mu$ is
162: its magnetic moment. The solution for the luminosity is
163: \begin{equation}
164: L_{dip}(t) = L_{0} ( 1 + t / t_{0} )^{-2}.
165: \end{equation}
166: in terms of the initial luminosity L$_{0}$ = 2/3 $\mu^2 \Omega(0)^4 / c^3$ .
167: The timescale t$_{0}$ is the initial energy loss timescale of dipole radiation,
168: \begin{equation}
169: t_{0}= E_{0} / L_{0} = \frac{3 I c^3}{4 \mu^2 \Omega(0)^2}
170: \end{equation}
171: where E$_{0}$ = 1/2 I $\Omega(0)^{2}$ is the initial rotational energy.
172:
173: The bound provided by the observed bolometric luminosity at time t
174: is $L_{dip}(t) < L_{bol}(t)$. Using Eq. (2) and substituting for L$_{0}$ and t$_{0}$,
175: we obtain
176: \begin{equation}
177: \left( 1 + \frac{4 \mu^2 \Omega(0)^2 t}{3 I c^3 } \right)^2 > \frac{ 2 \mu^2 \Omega(0)^4}{3 c^3 L_{bol}(t)} .
178: \end{equation}
179: Expressing the inequality in terms of the initial period P$_0$ and
180: magnetic moment $\mu$ and taking the square root leads to
181: \begin{equation}
182: ({P_0}^2 + \frac{16 \pi^2 \mu^2 t}{3 I c^3 }) > \frac{ 4 \pi^2 \mu }{ (3/2 c^3 L_{bol}(t))^{1/2}} .
183: \end{equation}
184: Completing the square in terms of $\mu$ and normalizing,
185: we obtain the constraint
186: \begin{equation}
187: \frac{{P_0}^2}{{\bar{P}(t)}^2} + \frac{(\mu - \bar{\mu}(t))^2}{{\bar{\mu}(t)}^2} > 1.
188: \end{equation}
189:
190: Thus, the allowed values of the magnetic moment $\mu$ and initial
191: period P$_0$ must lie outside an ellipse in the P$_0$-$\mu$ plane, with
192: \begin{eqnarray}
193: \bar{P}(t) &=& ( \frac{I \pi^2}{2 t L_{bol}(t)})^{1/2} \\
194: \bar{\mu}(t) &=& \frac{(6c^3)^{1/2} I }{8 t (L_{bol}(t))^{1/2}}
195: \end{eqnarray}
196: as shown in Fig. 1.
197: For initial rotation periods P$_0 < \bar{P}$, the dipole luminosity is less than the
198: observed L$_{bol}$(t), either because the magnetic moment is small or the magnetic
199: moment is large enough that the dipole luminosity has decreased rapidly.
200: For P$_0 > \bar{P}$, the initial rotation rate is slow enough that the pulsar's
201: luminosity at time t is less than L$_{bol}$(t) for all values of the magnetic moment.
202:
203: As the observed bolometric luminosity decays rapidly with time, the forbidden ellipse
204: in the P$_0$-$\mu$ plane expands, as indicated by Eqs. (5) and (6). Thus, in a
205: data set L$_{bol}$(t) extending to t = t$_{max}$ it is the lowest
206: luminosity L$_{bol}$(t$_{max}$) that yields the tightest constraint,
207: encompassing the constraints imposed by all earlier observations. The bolometric
208: luminosity observed for over 10 yr is fitted quite well by a series of exponential
209: decays corresponding to the radioactive decays of $^{56}$Co, $^{57}$Co, $^{44}$Ti, $^{22}$Na,
210: and $^{60}$Co (Timmes et al. 1996). Bouchet et al. (1991) have compiled the bolometric
211: luminosity evolution
212: in the IR, optical and UV bands for days 14-432 after the supernova.
213: An initial hump is followed after 130 days by an exponential decay of time
214: constant $\tau \cong $110 days, corresponding to the decay of $^{56}$Co (see Fig. 3. of Bouchet et al. (1991)),
215: with a slight increase in the rate
216: of decay after t= 300 days. At later times the bolometric luminosity can be
217: fitted with a sum of slower decays. At 3346 days the bolometric
218: luminosity L$_{bol}$ = 2.1 $\times$ 10$^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$, fitting on a curve corresponding
219: to the decay of $^{44}$Ti (Balberg et al. 1999). Later data taken by the Hubble Space
220: Telescope Wide Field Planetary Camera and Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 give UBVRI magnitudes corrected by subtraction of the ring
221: contribution in the SN1987A images (Soderberg, Challis \& Suntzeff 1999). We use the
222: latest observations reported
223: in this work, deriving a bolometric luminosity L$_{bol}$ = 3 $\times$ 10$^{34}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
224: from the UBVRI magnitudes at 4339 days, using a distance of 55 kpc for the LMC. The
225: magnitudes were converted to luminosities using the standard bandwidths and conversion formulae
226: for the UBVRI bands (Padmanabhan 2001).
227:
228: Fig. 1 shows the results using these late data. We obtain a characteristic
229: period $\bar{P}$(t=4339 days) of 21 s; thus a pulsar born with a longer
230: rotation period would remain below the bolometric luminosity limit no matter
231: what its magnetic dipole moment is. The characteristic magnetic moment
232: $\bar{\mu}$ (t = 4339 days) is 2.4 $\times$ 10$^{34}$ G cm$^3$ for a neutron star
233: with moment of inertia
234: I = 10$^{45}$ gm cm$^2$. For initial periods P$_0$ of 10, 15, or 30 ms, we
235: find that two alternatives are allowed. The magnetic dipole moment is either
236: less than 2.8 $\times$ 10$^{27}$, 6.4 $\times$ 10$^{27}$, or
237: 2.5 $\times$ 10$^{28}$ G cm$^3$,
238: respectively for these initial periods, or it is greater
239: than $\cong$ 2 $\bar{\mu}$ = 4.8 $\times$ 10$^{34}$ G cm$^3$.
240: For a slow initial rotation rate, eg. P$_0$ = 0.3 s, we
241: find $\mu < 2.5 \times$ 10$^{30}$ or $\mu > 2.4 \times$ 10$^{34}$ G cm$^3$.
242: For a pulsar born with a 2 ms rotation rate, $\mu < 1.1 \times$ 10$^{26}$ or $\mu > 2.4 \times$ 10$^{34}$ G cm$^3$.
243:
244: \section{Discussion}
245:
246: By using the bolometric luminosity of the central remnant in SN 1987A, one can obtain
247: interesting constraints on the properties of the neutron star at birth.
248: The constraints on initial rotation period and on magnetic dipole moment are not
249: independent of each other. To place the options in context, let us recall the
250: possibilities presented by the conventional interpretation of the radio pulsar population.
251:
252: Regarding the initial periods, the population of ``fresh" normal radio pulsars
253: (as distinct from the ``recycled" binary and millisecond radio pulsars
254: (Alpar et al. 1982, Radhakrishnan \& Srinivasan 1982)
255: implies P$_0 \sim$ 10-30 ms, by extrapolation from the youngest pulsars.
256: An alternative suggestion, particularly for the possible pulsar in SN 1987A,
257: is that it was formed by a core merger (Chen \& Colgate 1995, Middleditch et al. 2000).
258: The pulsar is expected to have an initial period in the millisecond
259: range, and millisecond pulsars in general can be young objects according to this scenario.
260:
261: The suggestion that some pulsars are born with slow rotation rates
262: to explain the distribution in the P-$\dot{P}$ diagram
263: has proved difficult to check conclusively because of a
264: complex of selection effects and has led to conflicting results.
265: Slow initial rotation rates are not supported by the later work (Lorimer et al. 1993).
266: The distribution in the P-$\dot{P}$ diagram can be obtained if pulsars
267: are born with short initial periods of 10-30 ms and evolve under
268: varying torques that include contributions other than the dipole
269: radiation torque at some epochs in the pulsars' evolution. This
270: is supported by the observation of braking indices less than the
271: dipole braking index n=3 (Kaspi et al. 2001) and ages that differ
272: significantly from the characteristic age P / 2$\dot{P}$ of dipole
273: spindown (Gaensler \& Frail 2000).
274:
275: The dipole magnetic moments of the majority of radio pulsars are on
276: the order of 10$^{30}$ G cm$^3$ (B $\sim$ 10$^{12}$ G). There is no
277: evidence for decay of the magnetic moment during the normal radio
278: pulsars' active lifetimes (Bailes 1989, Bhattacharya et al. 1992).
279: There are a few pulsars in the tail of the distribution, with dipole
280: magnetic moments in the 10$^{31}$ G cm$^3$ range (Camilo et al. 2000,
281: Morris et al. 2002, McLaughlin et al. 2003) and surface dipole magnetic
282: fields in the magnetar range, higher than the quantum critical
283: field B$_c \equiv ({m_{e}}^2 c^3)/(e \hbar)$ = 4.4 $\times$ 10$^{13}$ G.
284: PSR J1847-0130
285: (McLaughlin et al. 2003) has the highest dipole
286: moment, $\mu$ = 9.4 $\times$ 10$^{31}$ G cm$^3$,
287: corresponding to a dipole magnetic field of 9.4 $\times$ 10$^{13}$ G on
288: the magnetic equator and 1.9 $\times$ 10$^{14}$ G on the poles. These
289: pulsars lie in the upper right hand corner of
290: the P-$\dot{P}$ diagram, among the anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs)
291: and the soft gamma-ray (burst) repeaters (SGRs) for which the
292: magnetar model has been developed (see Thompson 2000 for a review).
293: While the magnetar model successfully addresses many properties of
294: the SGRs and AXPs, the period clustering and the presence of radio
295: pulsars with periods and inferred magnetic dipole moments similar
296: to those of AXPs and SGRs has motivated another class of models
297: involving fall-back disks and a combination of dipole radiation
298: and disk torques (Alpar 2001, Chatterjee, Hernquist \& Narayan 2000,
299: Ek\c{s}i \& Alpar 2003). In these models the magnetic moments of
300: pulsars like PSR J1847-0130, and of AXPs and SGRs can be in the
301: conventional 10$^{30}$ G cm$^3$ range. The absence or presence
302: and mass of such disks introduces a third neutron star parameter
303: at birth, in addition to P$_0$ and $\mu$. We shall assume here
304: that the possible pulsar in SN 1987A has no disk or a light enough
305: disk mass that its early evolution is determined by magnetic dipole
306: radiation, as must be the case for the typical radio pulsars. An
307: analysis of the present bolometric luminosity constraints allowing
308: for fallback disks in the initial conditions will be the subject of
309: separate work.
310: Inferred dipole magnetic moments of 10$^{27}$ - 10$^{28}$ G cm$^3$
311: are typical of the observed millisecond pulsars.
312: The recycling hypothesis
313: (Alpar et al 1982, Radhakrishnan \& Srinivasan 1982) is supported by the locations
314: of binary and millisecond pulsars in the P-$\dot{P}$ diagram, and particularly by
315: the discovery of millisecond rotation periods from low mass X-ray binaries
316: (Wijnands \& van der Klis 1998), of which now five are known. These links,
317: as well as the abundance of millisecond and binary pulsars in globular clusters,
318: suggest that the radio pulsars with such weak inferred magnetic dipole moments
319: are from an old population. The possible pulsar in SN 1987A is not expected
320: to have a magnetic moment on the order of 10$^{28}$ G cm$^3$ if only old pulsars
321: can have such weak fields. However, if the pulsar was born as a result of a core merger,
322: allowing it a millisecond period at birth, then the magnetic field could be weak.
323: Another possibility is that pulsars are born with weak initial magnetic fields, and
324: the dipole magnetic fields of conventional
325: $\mu \sim$ 10$^{30}$ G cm$^3$ pulsars and of magnetars are generated subsequently on
326: timescales longer than the 16 yr time span of SN 1987A observations
327: (see Reisenegger (2003) for a review and Michel (1994) for applications
328: to the possible pulsar in SN 1987A ).
329:
330: Allowing all pulsar birth scenarios with appropriate choices of initial periods, we found that for 10, 15, and 30 ms initial periods, the upper limits
331: on weak initial magnetic moments are 2.8 $\times$ 10$^{27}$, 6.4 $\times$ 10$^{27}$, or
332: 2.5 $\times$ 10$^{28}$ G cm$^3$. With the assumption of a slow rotator, say with an initial period of 0.3 s,
333: it was found that the constraint at the weak field end was not very stringent, $\mu < 2.5 \times$ 10$^{30}$ G cm$^3$.
334: If the pulsar was born from a core merger,
335: with an initial period of 2 ms, then the upper limit on a weak magnetic moment is as low as $\mu < 1.1 \times$ 10$^{26}$ G cm$^3$.
336:
337: For all choices of initial period considered above, if the initial magnetic moment is not weak, and if the putative pulsar is spinning down under a constant magnetic dipole
338: radiation torque, without field generation, we conclude that the
339: putative pulsar has a magnetic dipole moment $\mu$ greater than
340: 2.4 $\times$ 10$^{34}$ G cm$^3$. If weak initial magnetic moments can be ruled out for all
341: young pulsars, then we find that the possible pulsar in SN 1987A has to be a strong magnetar.
342: If that is the case, then we may need to change our strategy
343: for detecting the putative pulsar and look for its transient features, such as bursts observed
344: from anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters,
345: if the uniting property of all these sources is the possession of magnetar fields.
346:
347: \acknowledgments
348: We thank Jay Gallagher, Don Cox, Chryssa Kouveliotou and Ersin G\"{o}\u{g}\"{u}\c{s}
349: for useful discussions. H.\"{O}. thanks Sabanc{\i} University for hospitality during
350: the preparation of the manuscript. We thank the Turkish Academy of Sciences, and the
351: High Energy Astrophysics Working Group of T\"UBITAK for support.
352: \pagebreak
353: \begin{thebibliography}{}
354: \bibitem[Alpar et al. (1982)]{acrs} Alpar, M.A., Cheng, A.F., Ruderman, M.A. \& Shaham, J. 1982, Nature 300, 729
355: \bibitem[Alpar (2001)]{alp01} Alpar, M.A. 2001, ApJ 554, 1245
356: \bibitem[Bailes (1989)]{bail} Bailes, M. 1989, ApJ 342, 917
357: \bibitem[Balberg et al. (1999)]{balberg} Balberg, S., Colpi, M., Shapiro, S.L. \& Zampieri, L. 1999, Mercury 28, 8
358: \bibitem[Bhattacharya et al. (1992)]{bhat} Bhattacharya, D., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Hartman J.W. \& Verbunt, F. 1992,
359: A \& A 254, 198
360: \bibitem[Bouchet et al. (1991)]{bouchet} Bouchet, P. et al. 1991, A \& A 245, 490
361: \bibitem[Burrows (1988)]{buradam} Burrows, A. 1988, ApJ 334, 891
362: \bibitem[Camilo et al. (2000)]{camilo} Camilo, F. et al. 2000, ApJ 541, 367
363: \bibitem[Chatterjee, Hernquist \& Narayan (2000)]{CHN} Chatterjee, P., Hernquist, L. \& Narayan, R. 2000, ApJ 534, 373
364: \bibitem[Chen \& Colgate (1995)]{chen} Chen, K. \& Colgate, S.A. 1995, in "Millisecond Pulsars: a Decade of Surprise", ASP Conference Series, Vol. 72, A.S.Fruchter, M. Tavani \& D.C. Backer, eds.
365: \bibitem[Ek\c{s}i \& Alpar (2003)]{yavuz} Ek\c{s}i, K.Y. \& Alpar, M.A. 2003, ApJ, submitted
366: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Frail (2000)]{Gaensler} Gaensler, B.M. \& Frail, D.A. 2000, Nature 406, 158
367: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. (2001)]{kaspi} Kaspi, V.M. et al. 2001, ApJ 560, 371
368: \bibitem[Lorimer et al. (1993)]{lor} Lorimer, D.R., Bailes, M., Dewey, R.J. \& Harrison, P.A. 1993, MNRAS 263, 403
369: \bibitem[McLaughlin et al. (2003)]{McL} McLaughlin, M.A. et al. 2003, ApJ 591, L135
370: \bibitem[Michel (1994)]{michel} Michel, F.C. 1994, MNRAS 267, L4
371: \bibitem[Middleditch et al. (2000)] {midd} Middleditch, J. et al. 2000, New Astronomy 5, 243
372: \bibitem[Morris et al. (2002)]{morris} Morris, D.J. et al. 2002, MNRAS 335, 275
373: \bibitem[\"Ogelman et al. (1990)]{ogel90} \"Ogelman, H. B. et al. 1990, A \& A 237, L9
374: \bibitem[Padmanabhan (2001)]{pad} Padmanabhan, T. 2001, "Theoretical Astrophysics", Vol. II, Cambridge University Press
375: \bibitem[Park et al. 2003]{park} Park, s. et al. 2003, astro-ph/0308220
376: \bibitem[Radhakrishnan \& Srinivasan (1982)]{rad} Radhakrishnan, V. \& Srinivasan, G. 1982, Curr. Sci. 51, 1096
377: \bibitem[Reisenegger (2003)]{reis} Reisenegger, A. 2003, astro-ph/0307133
378: \bibitem[Soderberg, Challis \& Suntzeff (1999)]{sod} Soderberg, A.M., Challis, P. \& Suntzeff, N.B. 1999, BAAS 31, 977
379: \bibitem[Thompson(2000)]{magnetar} Thompson, C. 2000, in ``The Neutron Star - Black Hole Connection", Proc. NATO ASI, C. Kouveliotou, J. Ventura \& E. van den Heuvel, eds., Kluwer, p. 369.
380: \bibitem[Timmes et al. (1996)]{tim96}Timmes, F.X. , Woosley, S.E., Hartmann, D.H. \& Hoffman, R.D. 1996, ApJ 464, 332
381: \bibitem[Wijnands \& van der Klis (1998)]{msxrpsr} Wijnands, R. \& van der Klis, M. 1998, Nature 394, 344
382: \end{thebibliography}
383: \begin{figure}
384: \plotone{f1.eps}
385: \caption{The initial period P$_0$ and dipole magnetic moment $\mu$ of the putative pulsar allowed by the bolometric luminosity of SN 1987A must lie in the shaded region exterior to the ellipse shown. The semiminor axis $\bar{\mu}$ and the semimajor axis $\bar{P}$ are determined by L$_{bol}$(t) at each observation time t. As L$_{bol}$(t) decays exponentially, the extreme points of the ellipse move as indicated by the arrows, so that the ellipses at later times completely include the ellipses at earlier times and the tightest constraint is provided by the latest observations. The ellipse shown corresponds to the latest observations published by Soderberg et al (1999). \label{fig1}}
386: \end{figure}
387:
388: \end{document}