1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \usepackage{psfig}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5:
6:
7: \newcommand{\sub}[1]{_{\rm #1}}
8: \newcommand{\md}{\cal M}
9: \newcommand{\ab}[1]{#1\sub{AB}}
10: \newcommand{\oii}{{\sc [Oii]}}
11: \newcommand{\Mstar}{M\sub{star}}
12: \newcommand{\Rsfr}{\mathcal{R}\sub{SFR}}
13: \newcommand{\gapprox}{_>\atop^\sim} % math mode only!
14: \newcommand{\ltsima}{$\buildrel<\over\sim$}
15: \newcommand{\lapprox}{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
16:
17:
18: \shorttitle{A Strongly Lensed Galaxy at z$\sim$7}
19: \shortauthors{Kneib et al.}
20:
21: \received{2004 January 7}
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{A Probable z$\sim$7 Galaxy Strongly Lensed by the Rich Cluster
25: Abell\,2218: Exploring the Dark Ages}
26:
27: \author{Jean-Paul Kneib\altaffilmark{1,2},
28: Richard S. Ellis\altaffilmark{2}, Michael R. Santos
29: \altaffilmark{2,3} Johan Richard\altaffilmark{1,2}}
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Observatoire Midi-Pyr\'en\'ees, UMR5572,
31: 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31000 Toulouse, France}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Caltech, Astronomy, 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
33: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK}
34:
35: \footnotetext{\footnotesize
36: Using data obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope operated by
37: AURA for NASA and the W.M. Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea, Hawaii.
38: The W.M. Keck Observatory is operated as a scientific partnership
39: among the California Institute of Technology, the University of
40: California and NASA and was made possible by the generous
41: financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.}
42:
43: %\maketitle
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46:
47: We discuss the observational properties of a remarkably faint
48: triply-imaged galaxy revealed in a deep $z'$-band Advanced Camera
49: for Surveys observation of the lensing cluster Abell 2218
50: ($z=$0.175). A well-constrained mass model for the cluster, which
51: incorporates the outcome of recent Keck spectroscopic campaigns,
52: suggests that the triple system arises via a high redshift ($z>6$)
53: source viewed at high magnification ($\simeq\times$25). Optical
54: and infrared photometry from Hubble Space Telescope and the Keck
55: Observatory confirms the lensing hypothesis and suggests a
56: significant discontinuity occurs in the spectral energy
57: distribution within the wavelength interval 9250--9850\AA. If this
58: break is associated with Gunn-Peterson absorption from neutral
59: hydrogen, a redshift of 6.6$\,<z<$\,7.1 is inferred. Deep Keck
60: spectroscopy conducted using both optical and infrared
61: spectrographs fails to reveal any prominent emission lines in this
62: region. However, an infrared stellar continuum is detected whose
63: decline below 9800\AA\ suggests a spectroscopic redshift towards
64: the upper end of the range constrained photometrically, i.e.
65: $z\simeq$7. Regardless of the precise redshift, the source is
66: remarkably compact ($\lapprox 1\,h_{70}^{-1}$kpc) and faint
67: ($z_{F850LP}=$28.0) yet is undergoing vigorous star formation at a
68: rate $\simeq$2.6~$M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$. An intriguing property is
69: the steep slope of the ultraviolet continuum implied by the
70: photometry which may suggest that the source is representative of
71: an early population of galaxies responsible for cosmic reionization.
72: Independent verification of these results is highly desirable but
73: our attempts highlight the difficulty of studying such sources
74: with present facilities and the challenges faced in pushing back
75: the frontiers of the observable universe beyond $z\sim$6.5.
76:
77: \end{abstract}
78:
79: \keywords{cosmology: observations, galaxies: formation, galaxies:
80: evolution, gravitational lensing}
81:
82: \section{Introduction}
83:
84: Reionization was a landmark event which imprinted a signature over
85: the scale of the entire universe. After decades of lower limits on
86: the redshift at which it occurred, recent observations of QSOs
87: discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Becker et al.\ 2001;
88: Djorgovski et al.\ 2001, Fan et al.\ 2002) suggest that
89: reionization was just finishing at $z\sim6-6.5$. The discovery of
90: $z\simeq6.5$ galaxies with strong Lyman~$\alpha$ emission (Hu et
91: al.\ 2002, Kodaira et al.\ 2003) is illustrative of possible
92: sources which may be responsible. Analysis of recent temperature
93: and polarization fluctuation data from the \textit{WMAP} satellite
94: suggests an optical depth for Thompson scattering of
95: $\tau=0.17\pm$0.04, implying that reionization began at higher
96: redshift, perhaps as early as $z\sim 15-20$ (Kogut et al.\ 2003,
97: Spergel et al.\ 2003).
98:
99: The discovery of star-forming galaxies at $z\simeq6.5$ is an
100: important step toward understanding the nature of the sources
101: responsible for the end of cosmic reionization. However, to
102: explore the earlier stages implied by the \textit{WMAP} results,
103: it is necessary to push the search for star forming systems to
104: higher redshifts. With current facilities this is technically very
105: challenging. It is perhaps salutary to note that the current
106: redshift frontier ($z=6.5$, corresponding to an observed
107: Lyman~$\alpha$ wavelength of 9200\AA ) is coincident with the
108: wavelength at which optical CCD detectors fall significantly in
109: their quantum efficiency. Ground-based infrared spectroscopy,
110: necessary for exploring sources at higher redshift, is especially
111: difficult at faint limits.
112:
113: Color-based searches for $z>$6 sources with the Advanced Camera
114: for Surveys ({\em ACS}) on-board the Hubble Space Telescope ({\em
115: HST}) is now recognized as a valuable way of locating $z>6$
116: sources. Promising results have been obtained by utilizing the
117: long wavelength F850LP ($z'$-band) filter in conjunction with deep
118: infrared imaging on {\em HST} or with large ground-based
119: telescopes (Bouwens et al.\ 2003, Yan et al.\ 2003, Stanway et
120: al.\ 2003, Dickinson et al.\ 2003). In view of significant
121: contamination of red `drop-out' samples by cool stars (e.g.
122: Stanway et al.\ 2003), the primary challenge lies in
123: spectroscopically verifying faint candidates (e.g. Dickinson et
124: al.\ 2000). Neither optical nor infrared spectrographs on the
125: current generation of ground-based telescopes may have the
126: sensitivity to give convincing results unless strong emission
127: lines are present. Although most of the distant sources found
128: beyond $z\simeq$5 have been identified via strong Lyman~$\alpha$
129: emission (Stern \& Spinrad 1999, Spinrad 2003), some sources
130: should have weak or no Lyman~$\alpha$ emission (e.g. Spinrad et
131: al.\ 1998). Indeed, a significant fraction ($\sim 75$\%) of the
132: most intensely star-forming galaxies located by color selection
133: techniques at $z\simeq3$, reveal Lyman $\alpha$ only in absorption
134: (Shapley et al.\ 2003).
135:
136: Gravitational magnification by foreground clusters of galaxies,
137: whose mass distributions are tightly constrained by arcs and
138: multiple images of known redshift, has already provided new
139: information on the abundance of high redshift objects (Kneib et al
140: 1996, Santos et al.\ 2003). Particularly high magnifications
141: ($\simeq\times$10-50) are expected in the {\it critical regions}
142: which can be located precisely in well-understood clusters for
143: sources occupying specific redshift ranges (Ellis et al.\ 2001).
144: Although the volumes probed in this way are far smaller than those
145: addressed in panoramic narrow band surveys (Hu et al.\ 1998,
146: Malhotra et al.\ 2001, Hu et al.\ 2003) or the color-based surveys
147: cited earlier, if the surface density of background sources is
148: sufficient, lensing may provide the necessary boost for securing
149: the first glimpse of young cosmic sources beyond $z\simeq$6.5
150: (Santos et al.\ 2003).
151:
152: In the course of studying the detailed rest-frame properties of
153: the image pair of a lensed $z=5.576$ galaxy in the cluster
154: Abell~2218 (Ellis et al 2001), we have discovered a new faint pair
155: of images in a deep $z'$-band {\em ACS} observation of this
156: cluster. Based on the geometrical configuration of this pair and
157: its photometric properties, we concluded that the images most
158: likely arise via strong magnification of a distant $z>$6 source.
159: The implied high redshift of this source led us to explore its
160: properties in more detail.
161:
162: A plan of the paper follows. We present the photometric
163: observations in Section 2. Section 3 discusses redshift
164: constraints determined independently from the lensing model of
165: Abell 2218 and the spectral energy distribution based on
166: broad-band photometry. Section 4 summarizes our attempts to detect
167: Lyman~$\alpha$ emission spectroscopically and discusses the
168: implications of a continuum discontinuity seen in the infrared
169: spectrum. We discuss the source properties and implications
170: further in Section 5. Throughout we assume a cosmological model
171: with $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ and H$_0$=70
172: km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$.
173:
174: \section{Photometric Observations}
175:
176: The source in question was originally discovered as a pair of
177: images ($a$ and $b$ on Figure~1) with reflection symmetry and a
178: separation of 7\arcsec\, in a deep (5-orbit, 11.31 ksec) {\em HST}/{\em
179: ACS}-F850LP ($z'$-band) observation of the Abell 2218 cluster of
180: galaxies. The observation was conducted as part of GO program 9452
181: (PI: Ellis) to characterize the stellar continuum in the lensed
182: pair at $z$=5.576 discussed earlier by Ellis et al.\ (2001).
183:
184: The new {\em ACS} images were reduced using standard {\sc
185: IRAF}\footnote{{\sc IRAF} is distributed by the National Optical
186: Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of
187: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
188: agreement with the National Science Foundation.} and {\sc STSDAS}
189: routines. The source was found by blinking the reduced F850LP
190: image with two archival images taken at shorter wavelength with
191: the F814W and F606W filters of the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2
192: ({\em WFPC2}) (SM-3a ERO program 8500, PI: Fruchter; exposure time
193: F606W: 10 ksec, F814W: 12 ksec). A prominent discontinuity in the
194: brightness of the pair can be seen viewing, in sequence, the
195: F850LP, F814W and F606W frames (Figure~1). Together with the
196: geometrical arrangement and symmetry of the pair in the context of
197: our mass model for Abell 2218, this suggested the source is at
198: high redshift and gravitationally magnified by the cluster (see
199: $\S$3).
200:
201: The two images have similar appearance in the {\em HST}/NICMOS
202: F160W image. This $H$-band data was also obtained under the GO
203: program 9452 and was acquired in a 4-orbit CVZ observation
204: totalizing 22.2~ksec of exposure time. Similarly, we also
205: identified the lensed pair in a deep Keck NIRC $J$-band image
206: (5.64 ksec exposure) taken in 0.65\arcsec seeing on July 22 and
207: 23, 2002 (Blain and Reddy private communication).
208:
209: A clear mirror symmetry is seen in the {\em HST} data; both images
210: contain a bright core, a second fainter knot and extended emission
211: of lower surface brightness. The orientation of the pair also
212: closely matches the predicted shear direction (Figure 1). The
213: lensing hypothesis is further verified by comparing the colors of
214: the two images $a$ and $b$ using the available photometric data
215: summarized in Table 1\footnote{All photometric quantities are
216: based on the Vega system}. Colors were computed using a fixed
217: elliptical aperture, and are identical for both images within the
218: uncertainties. (For the $z_{850LP}-J$ color, the {\em ACS}
219: $z'$-band image was convolved by a gaussian to match the seeing of
220: the Keck NIRC J image).
221:
222: \clearpage
223: \begin{figure*}
224: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.ps,width=18cm}}
225:
226: \noindent{\bf Figure 1:}\quad {\em WFPC2}-F606W, {\em
227: WFPC2}-F814W, {\em ACS}-F850LP and NICMOS-F160W images of Abell
228: 2218 of the new faint pair in the lensing cluster Abell 2218
229: ($z$=0.175). The signals redward of the {\em WFPC2}-F814W
230: observation suggests a marked break occurs in the continuum signal
231: at around 9600\AA\ . Red lines correspond to the predicted
232: location of the critical lines at $z_s$=5,6.5 and 7 (from bottom
233: to top, the latter two being almost coincident). The scale bar at
234: the top left of each image represents 2\arcsec. The predicted
235: shear direction (thin blue lines) closely matches the orientation of
236: the lensed images.
237: \end{figure*}
238:
239: \clearpage
240: \begin{figure*}
241: %\centerline{\psfig{file=f2.ps,width=15cm}}
242: \centerline{see jpeg file}
243: \noindent{\bf Figure
244: 2:}\quad (Top) Location of the image pair $a,b$ and the third
245: image $c$ in a pseudo-color image made from the {\em WFPC2}-F606W,
246: F814W and {\em ACS}-F850LP images. The red curves refers to the
247: critical lines of infinite magnification for sources placed at
248: $z$=5.576 and $z$=7.0 in the context of Kneib et al's (1996) mass
249: model revised to include the $z$=5.576 pair (shown as unlabelled
250: circles at the top of the figure) discussed by Ellis et al.\ (2001)
251: and a triply-imaged SCUBA source at $z$=2.515 (Kneib et al.\ 2004a).
252: (Bottom) Pseudo-color representation of the three images demonstrating
253: their association with a single lensed source.
254: \end{figure*}
255: \clearpage
256:
257: \section{Redshift Constraints}
258:
259: \subsection{Gravitational Lensing}
260:
261: In the context of the tightly-constrained mass model of Abell 2218
262: (Kneib et al.\ 1996), updated to include the properties of the
263: $z$=5.576 pair identified by Ellis et al.\ (2001) and the more
264: recent confirmation of a triply-imaged sub-millimeter selected
265: source at $z$=2.515 (Kneib et al.\ 2004a), the symmetry expected
266: for a lensed pair around the critical line implies a source
267: redshift $z_s>$6 (see curves in Figure~1). The absolute location
268: of the $z$=6 critical line is particularly well understood in this
269: region from the measured symmetry of the adjacent $z$=5.576 pair
270: around its critical line shown in Figure~2. However, the lensing
271: configuration for the new source provides only a fairly weak
272: constraint on the precise redshift beyond this lower limit since
273: the location of the critical line does not change significantly
274: beyond $z\simeq$6 (Figure~1).
275:
276: Our mass model for Abell 2218 requires there to be a third image
277: of the source, which we successfully located in the $z'$-band
278: image at the expected position (image $c$ in Figure~2) and with
279: the expected flux (Table~1). Although our photometric coverage of
280: this third, fainter, image is not as complete as that for the
281: primary pair (because of the smaller field of the infrared cameras
282: used), importantly the {\em HST} photometry confirms the same
283: discontinuity in flux seen between F850LP and F606W (Figure~2,
284: Table~1). The improved mass model suggests that all 3 images
285: represent manifestations of a single source at $z>$6 magnified by
286: a factor of $\simeq$25 (in the case of images $a$ and $b$). The
287: intrinsic (unlensed) source brightness is $z_{850LP}=28.0\pm0.1$,
288: $H_{160W}=26.5\pm 0.1$.
289:
290: \subsection{Spectral Energy distribution}
291:
292: Figure~3 summarizes the available broad-band photometry for the
293: brightest of the three images ($a$ in Figure~1). We include, for
294: completeness, the Keck NIRC J measurement although, as a
295: ground-based measurement it is more adversely affected by crowding
296: and background issues related to the adjacent luminous cluster
297: members. Its low significance provides little more than evidence
298: for a detection. Accordingly, we do not use the J band data in any
299: of the subsequent analysis.
300:
301: A significant discontinuity in flux is apparent in the wavelength
302: interval $\lambda\lambda$ $\sim$9200\AA--1$\mu$m. The overlap in
303: sensitivity between the WFPC-2 filter F814W and the {\em ACS}
304: filter F850LP is of particular diagnostic use. If it is assumed
305: the $z>$ 6 source has a UV continuum which rises to shorter
306: wavelengths with a discontinuity produced by a Gunn-Peterson
307: trough at around $\lambda_{rest}$=1216\AA, the ratio of the F814W
308: and F850LP fluxes can be used to estimate the redshift depending
309: on the slope of the UV continuum.
310:
311: Assuming the spectral energy distribution is given by a simple
312: relation: $f(\lambda)\propto\lambda^{-\alpha}$ for
313: $\lambda/(1+z)>$1216\AA\ and $f(\lambda)=0$ otherwise, the
314: accurate {\em HST} photometry (F606W, F814W, F850LP, F160W)
315: implies the discontinuity occurs in the wavelength interval
316: 9250--9850\AA, corresponding to 6.6$<z<$7.1 (see dashed lines in
317: Figure~3)\footnote{Although the weak NIRC J detection suggests a
318: shallower UV slope, we give this discrepancy low weight in view of
319: the superior quality of the HST data}. The photometric redshift
320: constraint is particularly firm at the lower end. Below
321: $z\simeq$6.6 it is hard to justify the observed F814W and F850LP
322: flux ratio regardless of the form of the spectral energy
323: distribution. In summary, therefore, the available HST photometry
324: suggests the lensed source lies beyond $z\simeq$6.6.
325:
326: \begin{figure*}
327: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.ps,width=14cm,angle=-90}} \noindent{\bf
328: Figure 3:} (Top) Relative efficiencies of the filter+instrument
329: used in our photometric observations. From left to right: {\em
330: WFPC2}-F814W, {\em ACS}-F850LP and {\em NICMOS}-F160W. (Bottom)
331: Spectral energy distribution of image $a$ uncorrected for lensing
332: magnification. Photometric points are indicated by blue crosses,
333: and the 3$\sigma$ point source detection limits are indicated by a
334: horizontal dashed red lines below each data point. The
335: non-detection of the continuum in the LRIS 9000--9300\AA\ window
336: is indicated by the black arrow. Red dashed lines correspond to
337: power law spectral energy distributions (with
338: $f\propto\lambda^{-\alpha}$ for $\lambda/(1+z)>1216$\AA\ and $f=0$
339: otherwise) with slope indices (from bottom to top at 1.2 10$^4$
340: \AA\,) of $\alpha$=3,4 and 5. The available data are consistent
341: with a neutral hydrogen break in the interval 9250--9850\AA\
342: corresponding to 6.6$<z<$7.1.
343: \label{fig.sedplot}
344: \end{figure*}
345:
346: \section{Optical and Infrared Spectroscopy}
347:
348: Given the possibility that the lensed source lies beyond a
349: redshift $z\simeq$6.6 with a Gunn-Peterson discontinuity in the
350: wavelength range 9250--9850\AA\, we next tried to detect
351: Lyman~$\alpha$ emission in this region using both the Near
352: Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSPEC, McLean et al.\ 2001) on Keck II
353: and the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (LRIS, Oke et al.\
354: 1998) on Keck I. If around half of the flux in the F850LP band
355: arises via a Lyman~$\alpha$ emission line, in a manner analogous
356: to the $z=$5.576 source (Ellis et al. 2001), we considered that the
357: LRIS campaign should be successful in securing the redshift,
358: particularly since the lower part of the region to explore is,
359: by good fortune, one of the ``windows" of low OH sky emission used
360: by narrow band imagers to locate Lyman~$\alpha$
361: emitters (e.g. Kodaira et al.\ 2003).
362:
363: We used LRIS on two runs, May 31 - June 1 2003 and June 30 - July
364: 1 2003 (see Kneib et al.\ 2004b for a complete description of
365: these data). During the first observing run we observed the
366: brighter pair of the triple system using the 600 line grating
367: blazed at 1$\mu$m for a total of 13.8\ ksec. The first night
368: offered relatively poor conditions (cirrus, high humidity) but
369: 9.0\ ksec was secured on the second night in slightly better
370: conditions. For these observations the wavelength coverage ranged
371: from 6930 to 9500\AA. No signal was detected from either image.
372:
373: During the second observing run, we used the same configuration
374: and integrated for 9.2\ ksec in relatively good conditions with
375: $\sim 0.8\arcsec$ seeing. The wavelength coverage was extended
376: slightly to the red to reach 9600\AA. In the following, only the
377: second observing run will be utilized as the data quality is much
378: better. Flux calibration was conducted using Feige 67, Feige 110
379: and Wolf 1346 spectrophotometric standards observed in twilight.
380: The spectroscopic observations were reduced using {\sc IRAF}.
381: Despite the improved conditions, no continuum or emission lines
382: were detected to 9600\AA\, from either image. The absence of any
383: LRIS detection in the clean wavelength range 9000-9300 \AA\ places
384: an additional constraint on the lower redshift limit. In Figure 3
385: we illustrate this via an upper limit on the absolute flux (black
386: symbol) which further suggests the source lies beyond
387: $z\simeq$6.6.
388:
389: The NIRSPEC (McLean et al.\ 1998) observations were obtained with
390: the Keck II telescope on the nights of May 10 and 11 2003. The
391: spectrograph was used in low-dispersion mode using a filter with
392: transmission from 9500 to 11200\AA. A slit width of 0.76\arcsec\,
393: was used to acquire the pair giving a spectral resolution of
394: $R$=1100. We obtained 37 exposures of 900~sec yielding a total
395: integration time of 33\ ksec. We dithered along the slit between
396: two different positions, verifying our pointing on a nearby
397: reference star using the slit-viewing guide camera at each dither.
398: These observations were also reduced using {\sc IRAF}. Individual
399: spectra were registered using offsets determined from simultaneous
400: images obtained with the slit-viewing guide-camera. Our optimally
401: combined spectrum of each image comprised 26 individual exposures
402: totaling an effective exposure time of 23\ ksec. All of the
403: combined exposures were obtained in photometric conditions or
404: through thin clouds. The data were flux calibrated using
405: observations of Feige~110 (Massey \& Gronwall 1990) which provide
406: an effective calibration from 9700--10200\AA\ . Tests with two
407: other standard stars (Feige~34 and Wolf~1346) indicate the
408: relative flux calibration should be much more reliable than the
409: absolute calibration; we have probably suffered from slit losses
410: and possible absorption during the night due to faint cirrus. No
411: emission lines were seen in the extracted NIRSPEC spectra but a
412: faint stellar continuum was detected for both images $a$ and $b$;
413: the signal is slightly stronger for $a$.
414:
415: Although observational selection plays an important role, as most
416: successfully identified $z>5$ galaxies display intense
417: Lyman~$\alpha$ emission (Spinrad 2003), it is interesting to
418: consider the maximum possible {\em observed} equivalent width,
419: $W_{max}$, implied by our non-detections in the LRIS and NIRSPEC
420: data. Using our spectrophotometric calibration, assuming a line
421: width of 5\AA\, and a conservative 5$\sigma$ detection limit,
422: Figure~4 shows $W_{max}$ as a function of wavelength for our data.
423: Although OH airglow emission precludes detection in a few small
424: wavelength regions, for 60\% of the important 9000\AA\,--9500\AA\,
425: interval an observed equivalent width larger than 120\AA\, (a
426: value much less than for most high redshift star forming sources,
427: Hu et al 2003) would have been detected. From 9000--9300\AA\,
428: (6.4$<z<$6.65) and longward of 9550\AA\, ($z>$6.85) the constraint
429: is tighter. Because of the much deeper exposures with NIRSPEC and
430: the stronger continuum redward of 9800\AA, a more stringent
431: 5$\sigma$ upper limit of $W_{max}<$60\AA\, is derived for the
432: 9550--11100\AA\, window effectively ruling out any reasonable
433: level of emission in the redshift range 6.85$<z<$8.2. Thus it
434: seems reasonable to deduce that, {\em if the redshift is not in
435: the 6.65$<z<$6.85 interval}, Lyman~$\alpha$ emission is either
436: very weak or absent. It will be important in future, deeper,
437: observations to rule out an emission line hiding in the OH forest
438: at $\sim$9500\AA\, corresponding to a source at $z\sim$6.8.
439:
440: \begin{figure*}
441: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.ps,width=15cm,angle=270}}
442:
443: \noindent{\bf Figure 4} Observed equivalent width detection limit
444: (5$\sigma$), $W_{max}$, for Lyman~$\alpha$ emission in the LRIS
445: and NIRSPEC data assuming a line width of 5\AA\,. An emission line
446: stronger than $W$=120\AA (indicated by the horizontal line),
447: corresponding to an integrated line flux of 1.6$\times$10$^{-18}$
448: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$\AA\,$^{-1}$, would have been seen for 60\%
449: of the wavelength range 9000\AA\,--9500\AA. Constraints in the
450: range 9000--9300\AA\, and beyond 9550\AA\ are tighter. The longer
451: NIRSPEC integrations provide a maximum equivalent width below
452: $W$=60\AA\, for the entire 9550--11100\AA\, range, corresponding
453: to an integrated line flux of 7$\times$10$^{-19}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
454: cm$^{-2}$\AA\, $^{-1}$. \label{fig.eqw}
455: \end{figure*}
456:
457: The absence of Lyman~$\alpha$ emission in a distant source may
458: seem surprising. However, there are many examples of luminous
459: Lyman break galaxies at lower redshift with weak or no emission
460: (Shapley et al.\ 2003). Indeed, those authors claim only 20-25\%
461: of star-forming examples show Lyman~$\alpha$ emission sufficiently
462: prominent to be classified as narrow band excess objects.
463:
464: The most important outcome of the long NIRSPEC exposure is the
465: detection of a very faint continuum redward of 9800\AA\,
466: (Figure~5). A continuum signal is seen in both images. As it is
467: stronger in image $a$, we will use this spectrum for the following
468: analysis. Given the absence of Lyman~$\alpha$ emission and the
469: inference of a photometric break in the wavelength range
470: 9250--9850\AA\, the key question is therefore the lowest
471: wavelength at which a continuum signal can be seen in the NIRSPEC
472: data.
473:
474: Inspection of the data reveals a drop in the continuum flux at
475: 9800\AA\, shortward of which there is no reliably detected signal
476: despite a robust photometric calibration (see upper panels of
477: Figure 5). The OH spectrum is fairly clean in this region although
478: there is some atmospheric absorption which could affect the
479: calibration at 9500--9700\AA\ . Although the feature itself is
480: only marginal, the absence of flux below 9800\AA\ seems significant
481: when one considers the photometric data summarised in Figure 3.
482: Specifically, if the UV continuum extended down to 9250\AA\,, as
483: would be the case if the source were at $z$=6.6, it is difficult
484: to understand why the stellar continuum is not detected to shorter
485: wavelengths (Figure 5). Although this weak feature is the only
486: indicator in our exhaustive attempts to measure a spectroscopic
487: redshift, if it is indeed the cause of the Gunn-Peterson edge
488: inferred from the photometric data, a redshift of $z\simeq$7.05 is
489: implied. In this case, the photometric redshift analysis discussed
490: in $S\S$3.2 would indicate a steep UV continuum slope of
491: $\alpha$=5.
492:
493: \clearpage
494: \begin{figure*}
495: \centerline{\psfig{file=f5.ps,width=18cm,angle=0}} \noindent{\bf
496: Figure 5} NIRSPEC spectrum for image $a$ in the wavelength region
497: 9500\AA\,--1.1$\mu$m. (Top) Relative sensitivity of NIRSPEC in the
498: configuration used derived from 3 independent flux calibration
499: stars. Adequate sensitivity is available over the entire range.
500: (Middle) {\rm observed} spectrum of one of these standards,
501: Feige~110 illustrating {\sl a priori} the absence of any strong
502: atmospheric features in the reduction. The red hashed rectangle
503: indicates the region where variable atmospheric absorption is
504: expected (Massey \& Gronwall 1990). (Bottom) Flux calibrated
505: binned spectrum for image $a$. Error bars include the effect of
506: wavelength-dependent OH emission. Curves represent UV SEDs
507: consistent with the photometry (Figure 3) spanning the range
508: 6.6$<z<$7.1. The absence of significant flux below 9800 \AA\
509: suggests a redshift at the upper end of this range, i.e.
510: $z\simeq$7.
511:
512: \label{}
513: \end{figure*}
514: \clearpage
515: \section{A z$\simeq$7 Source}
516:
517: Clearly identifying the redshift of this source has been extremely
518: challenging and further studies would be highly desirable to
519: confirm our conclusions. We have introduced three independent
520: arguments which, taken in combination, justify why the
521: newly-located multiple images arise via a single lensed source at
522: a redshift $z\sim$7. First, the geometrical configuration of
523: images $a,b$ and $c$ with respect to the critical line in this
524: well-modeled cluster indicates $z>$6. We argued that the location
525: of the critical line in the vicinity of the pair is tightly
526: constrained from the successful identification of the earlier
527: source at $z$=5.576 (Ellis et al 2001). Secondly, there is a strong
528: break indicated in the spectral energy distribution (SED)
529: delineated by the broad-band photometry extending from the F606W
530: to F160W ($H$) filters, arguing for a redshift $6.6<z<7.1$.
531: The lower redshift limit $z>$6.6 is particularly firm and
532: supported by the absence of any LRIS continuum signal in the
533: wavelength range 9000-9300 \AA. Finally the absence of any
534: detectable signal below 9800\AA\ seen in the NIRSPEC continuum
535: argues the redshift lies in the upper end of the photometric
536: range, $z\simeq$7, as otherwise the rising UV continuum would have
537: been detected.
538:
539: Even if one disregards the weak feature in the NIRSPEC spectrum,
540: the 6.6$<z<$ 7.1 source is of considerable interest since, as we
541: discussed in $\S$3-4, it is difficult to reconcile a spectral
542: break at $\lambda>$9250\AA\ with a UV continuum slope of
543: $\alpha\lapprox 3$, assuming the UV continuum is described by a power law
544: above the Lyman~$\alpha$ discontinuity (Figure 3). Starburst
545: models assuming Population II metallicity and a Salpeter stellar
546: initial mass function (IMF) typically produce slopes of
547: $\alpha\lapprox 2$ (Leitherer et al.\ 1999). Clearly the inferred
548: UV continuum of the $z\sim7$ source rises faster to shorter
549: wavelengths than for any of the models calibrated with local data.
550: Models based on massive metal-free stars, such as those which may
551: be expected close to the epoch of reionization (Abel, Bryan, \&
552: Norman 2000; Bromm, Coppi, \& Larson 1999), do produce somewhat
553: steeper UV slopes, $\alpha\simeq3$ (Schaerer 2002). More precise
554: photometry for this object, particularly in the 1--1.5$\mu$m range
555: is needed to understand this issue. If a steep UV slope ($\alpha\geq 3$) is
556: indeed confirmed, the source may represent a promising candidate
557: for a Population III starburst.
558:
559: The star-formation rate (SFR) of the source can be estimated from
560: the stellar UV continuum luminosity. The unlensed F160W
561: magnitude, $H_{160W}=26.5\pm0.1$, translates into a specific flux
562: of $2.35\times10^{-31}$erg~s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$Hz$^{-1}$ at
563: 1.6$\mu$m, assuming a smooth SED. The intrinsic specific
564: luminosity at 2000\AA\ is then $1.85\times10^{28}$erg\,s$^{-1}$
565: Hz$^{-1}$ implying a SFR of 2.6~M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ using
566: Kennicutt's (1998) empirical calibration. We estimate a 15\% error
567: arising from uncertainties in the photometry and magnification.
568: This derived SFR is significantly higher than that for the
569: $\simeq$0.5 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ computed for the lensed source
570: at $z$=5.576 (Ellis et al.\ 2001) but within the range of typical
571: Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters at $z\simeq$5.5-6.5.
572:
573: Our estimated SFR may suffer from two systematic errors. If dust
574: is present, it will dim the UV continuum, causing us to
575: underestimate the value. However, assuming a familiar selective
576: extinction curve, reddening would then imply the intrinsic UV
577: continuum slope is even steeper than $\alpha\simeq$3-5. A second
578: uncertainty arises from our assumed stellar initial mass function
579: (IMF) and metallicity via Kennicutt's local calibration. If the
580: IMF is top-heavy or the metallicity is lower than in local
581: starbursts, the SFR will likely have been over-estimated.
582:
583: Given the intense star formation, the apparent lack of
584: Lyman~$\alpha$ emission is puzzling if dust extinction is not
585: important. Weak or absent Lyman~$\alpha$ emission seen in the
586: younger ($<$1 Gyr) Lyman break galaxies at $z\simeq$3 has been
587: interpreted via the presence of dust shrouds which are eventually
588: disrupted via feedback processes as the stellar population matures
589: (Shapley et al. 2003). As our source is likely younger than 500
590: Myr, a very specific dust/gas geometry would be needed to strongly
591: extinct the Lyman~$\alpha$ photons without reddening the UV
592: continuum. This problem may be exacerbated if the IMF is top-heavy
593: or the metallicity low, since the ionizing photon production rate
594: will be higher making any emission line yet more prominent (c.f.
595: Malhotra \& Rhoads 2002).
596:
597: An alternative explanation for the absence of Lyman $\alpha$
598: emission may be incomplete reionization at $z\simeq$7. Neutral
599: hydrogen can scatter Lyman~$\alpha$ photons after they have
600: escaped the ISM of the emitting galaxy (e.g., Miralda-Escude \&
601: Rees 1998). If the source were embedded in a neutral zone, even a
602: strong Lyman~$\alpha$ emission line emitted from the galaxy could
603: be quenched. However, in such cases, simulations suggest that
604: emission can still be observed even from sources embedded in fully
605: neutral zones, depending on details of the many relevant
606: parameters of the source (Haiman 2002, Santos 2003).
607:
608: Since the universe is only ~750 Myr old at $z=7$, the total
609: stellar mass is unlikely to exceed $1-2\times10^9$~M$_\odot$.
610: Halos of mass $>1.2\times10^{10}$M$_\odot$ at $z\simeq$7 are quite
611: consistent with conventional structure formation models (Barkana
612: \& Loeb 2002) and sufficient to supply baryons to sustain the
613: observed star formation rate. The instantaneous baryonic accretion
614: rate for such a halo at $z=7$ is, on average,
615: 4.4~M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ (e.g. Lacey \& Cole 1993), so even if an
616: earlier starburst consumed most of the baryons, they can be
617: rapidly replenished. Although we have no constraints on the actual
618: star-formation history, these arguments emphasize that we are not
619: necessarily viewing the system at a special time in its evolution.
620:
621: The strong magnification ($\simeq\times25$) of the two brighter
622: images gives us our first glimpse into the morphological structure
623: of a very distant source on sub-kpc scales. Both images $a$ and
624: $b$ have a bright core, a second fainter knot, and extended
625: emission of lower surface brightness (Figure~1). There is no
626: noticeable color gradient. Our mass model for Abell 2218 implies
627: magnifications of $\sim\times15$ along the major axis of images
628: $a$ and $b$, and $\sim\times1.7$ along the minor axis. The
629: $0.15\arcsec$ width of the F850LP PSF translates into a physical
630: resolution of $\sim$470~pc along the minor axis and $\sim$50~pc
631: along the major axis.
632:
633: We thus infer that the source (observed with 3.6\arcsec$\times
634: <0.15$\arcsec) has a maximum physical size of 1.2~kpc by
635: $<$500~pc. The maximal associated area of 0.6~kpc$^2$ indicates a
636: star-formation surface density in excess of
637: 4.3~M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$kpc$^{-2}$. The bright knot is only 100~pc
638: across implying a star-formation surface density in the range
639: $\sim$50-250~M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$kpc$^{-2}$ depending on the
640: exact geometry, comparable to the most intense starburst activity
641: observed locally (Kennicutt 1998).
642:
643: If this source is typical of those which reionized the Universe in
644: a narrow time interval of $\Delta\,z$=1 around $z\simeq$7, we can
645: estimate the expected surface density from the arguments presented
646: by Stiavelli et al (2003). Depending on the source temperature,
647: Lyman continuum escape fraction and clumpiness of the IGM, we
648: would deduce surface densities $n\simeq$0.3-5 arcmin$^{-2}$ are
649: necessary. In as much as it is possible to estimate the actual
650: surface density from one source and the limited area examined by
651: looking through only one cluster lens to find it, we find a number
652: density of $n\simeq1\pm0.5$ arcmin$^{-2}$.
653:
654: In conclusion, we present evidence that we have found a highly
655: magnified source which lies beyond $z\simeq6.6$, possibly at
656: $z\simeq$7. Even in advance of the infrared capabilities of
657: \textit{JWST}, further observation of this source will be
658: important in determining a more secure redshift, and improving the
659: constraints on the slope of the UV continuum. Further
660: spectroscopy in the 9200\AA -1$\mu$m region would be valuable to
661: probe any Lyman~$\alpha$ emission at $z\simeq$6.8 (Figure 4) and
662: to confirm (or otherwise) the significance of the weak continuum
663: drop seen in the NIRSPEC data at 9800\AA\ . The location of the
664: Gunn-Peterson trough might also be verified more precisely via narrow band
665: imaging through gaps in OH forest and with a deep ACS grism spectroscopy.
666:
667: Notwithstanding the need for further work and regardless of its
668: precise redshift in the constrained window 6.6$<z<$7.1, our source
669: appears to be a star-forming galaxy with intriguing spectral
670: properties, possibly representative of a new population
671: responsible for ending cosmic reionization. While our discovery
672: highlights many of the challenges facing searches for those
673: $z>$6.5 galaxies responsible for reionization, it also
674: demonstrates the ability of strong lensing by clusters of galaxies
675: to locate and reveal the detailed properties of high redshift
676: sources. The lensed galaxy presented in this paper, if observed
677: unlensed at $z_{AB}\sim28.5$ would lie at the detection limit of
678: the upcoming UDF observation\footnote{\rm
679: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/udf/parameters} and no spectroscopic
680: follow-up would have been possible.
681:
682: \acknowledgments
683:
684: We thank Fred Chaffee for his continued encouragement to track
685: down the nature of this intriguing system and acknowledge useful
686: discussions with Bob Abraham, Chris Conselice, Graham Smith, Mark
687: Sullivan and Tommaso Treu. Hy Spinrad and Andy Bunker are thanked
688: for reading an earlier version of this manuscript and offering
689: valuable suggestions. We thank two anonymous referees for their
690: valuable comments which significantly improved the presentation of
691: our data. Alice Shapley and Dawn Erb for helpful advice on the
692: optimum procedures for obtaining and reducing faint NIRSPEC data.
693: We also thank James Larkin and James Graham for their advice
694: concerning the use of NIRSPEC in the 1$\mu$m wavelength region.
695: Andrew Blain and Naveen Reddy kindly provided access to the Keck
696: NIRC observations. Faint object spectroscopy at the Keck
697: observatory is made possible through the dedicated efforts of Ian
698: McLean and collaborators for NIRSPEC, and Judy Cohen, Bev Oke,
699: Chuck Steidel and colleagues at Caltech for LRIS. JPK acknowledges
700: support from Caltech and CNRS. MRS acknowledges the support of
701: NASA GSRP grant NGT5-50339. The study of Abell 2218 as a cosmic
702: lens is supported by NASA STScI grant HST-GO-09452.01-A.
703:
704:
705: \begin{thebibliography}{}
706:
707: \bibitem[Abel, Bryan, \& Norman(2000)]{2000ApJ...540...39A} Abel, T.,
708: Bryan, G.~L., \& Norman, M.~L.\ 2000, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 540}, 39
709: \bibitem[]{664} Barkana, R., Loeb, A., 2002, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 578}, 1.
710: \bibitem[]{665} Becker, R. H. et al.\ (SDSS Collaboration) 2001, {\it Astron. J.}, {\bf 122}, 2850.
711: \bibitem[]{666} Bouwens, R. J. et al, 2001, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 595}, 589.
712: \bibitem[Bromm, Coppi, \& Larson(1999)]{1999ApJ...527L...5B} Bromm, V.,
713: Coppi, P.~S., \& Larson, R.~B.\ 1999, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 527}, L5
714: \bibitem[]{669} Dickinson, M. et al, 2003, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett} sumitted (astro-ph/0309070)
715: \bibitem[]{670} Djorgovski, S.G., Castro, S.M., Stern, D. \& Mahabal,
716: A.A. 2001, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 560}, L5.
717: \bibitem[]{672} Ebbels, T., Ellis, R.S., Kneib, J-P., Leborgne, J-F.,
718: Pell\`o, R., Smail, I.R. \& Sanahuja, B. 1999, {\it Mon. Not. R.
719: astr. Soc.}, {\bf 295}, 75.
720: \bibitem[]{675} Ellis, R.S., Santos, M.R., Kneib, J-P, Kuijken, K., 2001,
721: {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 560}, L119.
722: \bibitem[]{677} Fan, X. et al.\ (SDSS Collaboration) 2002, {\it Astron.
723: J.}, {\bf 123}, 1247.
724: \bibitem[Haiman(2002)]{2002ApJ...576L...1H} Haiman, Z.\ 2002, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett},
725: {\bf 576}, L1
726: \bibitem[]{681} Hu, E.M., Cowie, L.L. \& McMahon, R.G. 1998, {\it
727: Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 502}, L99.
728: \bibitem[]{683} Hu, E.M., Cowie, L.L., Capak, P., McMahon, R.G., Hayashimo, T.,
729: Komiyama Y., 2004, to appear in {\it Astron. J.}
730: (astro-ph/0311528)
731: \bibitem[]{686} Kennicutt, R.C. 1998, {\it Ann. Rev. Astron. Astr.},
732: {\bf 36}, 189.
733: \bibitem[]{688} Kneib, J.-P, Ellis, R.S., Smail, I.R., Couch, W.J. \&
734: Sharples, R.M. 1996, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 471}, 643.
735: \bibitem[]{690} Kneib, J.-P., van der Werf, P., Kraiberg, K., Smail, I.,
736: Blain, A., Frayer, D., Barnard, V., Ivison, R., 2004a, {\it Mon. Not. R.
737: astr. Soc.}, in press.
738: \bibitem[]{693} Kneib, J.-P. et al, 2004b, in preparation.
739: \bibitem[]{694} Kodaira, K. et al.\ 2003, {\it P.A.S.J. Lett}, {\bf 55}, L17.
740: \bibitem[]{695} Kogut, A. et al.\ 2003, {\it Astrophys. J. Suppl.}, {\bf 148}, 161.
741: \bibitem[Lacey \& Cole(1993)]{1993MNRAS.262..627L} Lacey, C.~\& Cole, S.\
742: 1993, {\it Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc.}, {\bf 262}, 627
743: \bibitem[]{698}Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J.D. 1999,
744: {\it Astrophys. J. Suppl.}, {\bf 123}, 3.
745: \bibitem[]{700} Malhotra, S. et al.\ 2001, in {\it Gas and Galaxy
746: Evolution}, eds. Hibbard, J.E. et al, ASP Conf. Series
747: (astro-ph/0102140)
748: \bibitem[Malhotra \& Rhoads(2002)]{2002ApJ...565L..71M} Malhotra, S.~\&
749: Rhoads, J.~E.\ 2002, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 565}, L71
750: \bibitem[Massey \& Gronwall(1990)]{mas90} Massey, P.~\& Gronwall, C.\
751: 1990, {\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 358}, 344
752: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mcl98} McLean, I.~S.~et al.\ 1998,
753: \procspie, {\bf 3354}, 566
754: \bibitem[Miralda-Escude \& Rees(1998)]{Miralda-Escude1998}
755: Miralda-Escude, J.~\& Rees, M.~J.\ 1998,{\it Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 497}, 21
756: \bibitem[]{711} Oke, J.B. et al.\ 1995, {\it Publ. Astr. Soc. Pac.},
757: {\bf 107}, 375.
758: \bibitem[]{713} Santos, M.R., 2003, {\it Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc.}, sumitted astro-ph/0308196
759: \bibitem[]{714} Santos, M.R., Ellis, R.S., Kneib, J-P, Richard, J., Kuijken, K., 2003,
760: {\it Astrophys. J.} sumitted (astro-ph/0310478)
761: \bibitem[]{716} Schaerer, D., 2002, {\it Astronomy \& Astrophysics}, {\bf 382}, 28.
762: \bibitem[]{718} Shapley, A.E., Steidel, C.C., Pettini, M., Adelberger, K.L., 2003, {\it
763: Astrophys. J.}, {\bf 588}, 65.
764: \bibitem[]{720} Spergel, D.N. et al.\ 2003, {\it Astrophys. J. Suppl.}, {\bf 148}, 175.
765: \bibitem[]{721} Spinrad, H., 2003, in {\it Astrophysics Update}, Mason J. (Ed.)
766: (astro-ph/0308411)
767: \bibitem[]{723} Spinrad, H., Stern, D., Bunker, A., Dey, A.,
768: Lanzetta, K., Yahil, A., Pascarelle, S., Fernandez-Soto, A. 2003,
769: {\it Astron. J}, {\bf 116}, 2617.
770: \bibitem[]{726} Stanway, E., Bunker, A., Mc Mahon, R., Ellis, R.S., Treu, T., Mc Carthy, P., 2003,
771: {\it Astrophys. J.} sumitted (astro-ph/0308124)
772: \bibitem[]{728} Stern, D. \& Spinrad, H. 1999, {\it Publ. Astron. Soc.
773: Pac.}, {\bf 111}, 1475.
774: \bibitem[]{730} Stiavelli, M., Fall, S.M., Panagia, N.\ 2004, {\it
775: Astrophys. J.}, in press.
776: \bibitem[Weymann et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...505L..95W} Weymann, R.~J., Stern,
777: D., Bunker, A., Spinrad, H., Chaffee, F.~H., Thompson, R.~I., \&
778: Storrie-Lombardi, L.~J.\ 1998, {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 505}, L95
779: \bibitem[]{735} Yan, H., Windhorst, R.A., Cohen, S.H., 2003,
780: {\it Astrophys. J. Lett}, {\bf 585}, L93.
781:
782: \end{thebibliography}
783:
784:
785: \newpage
786: \begin{deluxetable}{rlll}
787: \tabletypesize{\normalsize} \tablecaption{Observed Photometry for
788: the Triple System}\tablewidth{0pt} \tablehead{ \colhead{} &
789: \colhead{a} & \colhead{b} & \colhead{c} } \startdata
790: $\alpha_{J2000}$ & 16:35:54.73 & 16:35:54.40 & 16:35:48.92 \\
791: $\delta_{J2000}$ & 66:12:39.00 & 66:12:32.80 & 66:12:02.45 \\
792: $V_{606W}$ & not detected & not detected & not detected \\
793: $I_{814W}$ & 26.5$\pm0.2$ & 26.4$\pm0.2$ & not detected \\
794: $z_{850LP}$ & 24.38$\pm0.05$ & 24.54$\pm0.05$ & 25.9$\pm0.1$ \\
795: $J$ & 23.4$\pm0.3$ & 23.5$\pm0.3$ & --- \\
796: $H_{160W}$ & 22.96$\pm0.06$ & 23.01$\pm0.07$ & --- \\
797: $V_{606W}$-$z_{850LP}$ & $>$3.6 & $>$3.5 & $>$2.1 \\
798: $I_{814W}$-$z_{850LP}$ & 2.1$\pm0.2$ & 1.9$\pm0.2$ & $>$1.8\\
799: $z_{850LP}$-$J$ & 1.0$\pm0.3$ & 1.0$\pm0.4$ & --- \\
800: $z_{850LP}$-$H_{160W}$ & 1.42$\pm0.1$ & 1.53$\pm0.1$ & --- \\
801: Magnification & 25$\pm 3$ & 25$\pm 3$ & 5.3$\pm 0.5$ \\
802: \enddata
803:
804:
805: \bigskip
806:
807: \leftline{$3\sigma$ detection limits for a point source:}
808:
809: \smallskip
810:
811: \leftline{$V_{606W}=28.0$, $I_{814W}=27.2$, $z_{850LP}=26.7$,
812: $J=24.4$, $H_{160W}=25.8$.}
813:
814:
815: \end{deluxetable}
816:
817: \end{document}
818:
819: