1: %*************************************************
2: %document class of article
3: %with 4 .eps figures
4: %
5: %*************************************************
6:
7: \documentstyle[amssymb,12pt,epsfig]{article}
8: \textheight 22.5cm\topmargin -0.2 in \textwidth
9: 15.5cm\oddsidemargin 0cm\evensidemargin 0cm
10: \begin{document}
11: \baselineskip=22pt
12:
13: \hfill{\bf BIHEP-TH-2004-1}
14:
15: \hfill{\bf USTC-ICTS-04-02}
16:
17: \begin{center}
18: {\Large \bf Cosmic ray threshold anomaly \\ and kinematics in the
19: dS spacetime
20: }\\
21: \vspace{1cm}
22: Zhe Chang\footnote{changz@mail.ihep.ac.cn}~~and~~Shao-Xia Chen\footnote{ruxanna@mail.ihep.ac.cn}\\
23: {\em Institute of High Energy Physics,
24: Chinese Academy of Sciences} \\
25: {\em P.O.Box 918(4), 100039 Beijing, China}\\
26: Cheng-Bo Guan\footnote{guancb@ustc.edu.cn}\\
27: {\em Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study}\\
28: {\em University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China}\\
29: \end{center}
30: \vspace{1.5cm}
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We present a covariant framework of kinematics in the dS
33: spacetime, which is a natural postulate of recent astronomical
34: observations ($\Lambda>0)$. One-particle states are presented
35: explicitly. It is noticed that the dispersion relation of free
36: particles is dependent on the degrees of freedom of angular
37: momentum and spin. This fact can be referred to as the effects of
38: the cosmological constant on kinematics of particles. The
39: kinematics in dS spacetime is used to investigate the phenomenon
40: of ultra high energy cosmic rays. We emphasize the possibility of
41: solving the threshold anomalies of the interactions between ultra
42: high energy cosmic rays and soft photons in the covariant
43: framework of kinematics in the dS spacetime.
44: \newline
45: \newline
46: PACS numbers: 98.70.Sa, ~95.30.Cq, ~95.85.-e. \vspace{1.0cm}
47: \end{abstract}
48: \newpage
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: The origin of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) is one of
52: the outstanding puzzles of modern astrophysics. Today's
53: understanding of the phenomena responsible for the production of
54: UHECR is still limited. Currently, there are generally two
55: categories of production mechanisms of the UHECR. One is the
56: ``bottom-up" acceleration scenario with some astrophysical objects
57: as sources\cite{acc1,acc2}. The other is called ``top-down"
58: scenario in which UHECR particles are from the decay of certain
59: sufficiently massive particles originating in the early
60: Universe\cite{top1}.
61:
62: Decades ago, Greisen, Zatsepin and Kuzmin\cite{GZK} discussed the
63: propagation of the UHECR particles through the cosmic microwave
64: background radiation (CMBR). Due to the photopion production
65: process by the CMBR, the UHECR particles will lose their energies
66: drastically down to a theoretical threshold, which is about
67: $5\times 10^{19}$eV. That is to say, the mean free path for this
68: process is only a few Mpc\cite{GZK1}. This is the so-called GZK
69: cutoff. However, we have observed indeed hundreds of events with
70: energies above $10^{19}$eV and about 20 events above
71: $10^{20}$eV\cite{data1}-\cite{data5}. At the same time, there is
72: another paradox\cite{data6} in the terrain of cosmic ray, which
73: comes from the detected $20$TeV photons from the MrK $501$ (a BL
74: Lac object at a distance of $150$Mpc). Similar to the case of
75: UHECR, due to pair production process by the IR background
76: photons, the $20$TeV photons should have disappeared before
77: arrival at the ground-based detectors. Both of the puzzles can be
78: considered to be some cosmic ray threshold anomalies: energy of an
79: expected threshold is reached but the threshold has not been
80: observed yet.
81:
82: Recently, there is growing interest on the theory of doubly
83: special relativity (DSR)\cite{DSR1, DSR2}. In the DSR, there exist
84: two observer-independent scales. One of them is a scale of
85: velocity, which is identified with the velocity of light. The
86: other is a scale of mass/length, which is expected to be the order
87: of the Planck mass/length. In fact, the violation of the Lorentz
88: invariance and the Planck scale physics have long been studied as
89: possible solutions of the cosmic ray threshold
90: anomalies\cite{loren2}-\cite{loren8}. However, all of these
91: scenarios are far beyond the standard cosmological theory and the
92: standard model of particle physics. Furthermore, it is well-known
93: that we are still very far from a theory of quantum gravity, in
94: spite of extensive investigations on candidates such as the
95: supergravity, Kluza-Klein, noncommutative geometry and superstring
96: theory.
97:
98: The recent astronomical observations on supernovae
99: \cite{constant-super-1, constant-super-2} and CMBR
100: \cite{costant-cmbr} show that about two thirds of the whole energy
101: in the Universe is contributed by a small positive cosmological
102: constant $(\Lambda)$. An asymptotic de Sitter (dS) spacetime is
103: premised naturally. The physics in an asymptotic dS spacetime has
104: been discussed extensively\cite{ds-paper-1}-\cite{ds-paper-3}.
105:
106: In this paper, we discuss kinematics in an asymptotic dS
107: spacetime. The framework of classical as well as quantum
108: kinematics in the dS spacetime is set up carefully. We get a
109: general form of dispersion relation for free particles in the dS
110: spacetime. This formalism is used to describe the UHECR
111: propagating in the cosmic microwave background as well as the
112: TeV-$\gamma$ propagating in the infrared background. We obtain
113: explicitly the corrections of the GZK threshold for the UHECR
114: particles interacting with soft photons, which are dependent on
115: the cosmological constant as supposed in the beginning of the
116: paper. We show how the threshold varies with a positive
117: cosmological constant and additional degrees of freedom of the
118: angular momentums of interacting particles. It should be noticed
119: that, for a positive cosmological constant, the theoretic
120: threshold tends to be above the energies of all the observed
121: events. Thus, we may conclude that the tiny but nonzero
122: cosmological constant is a possible origin of the threshold
123: anomalies of the UHECR and the TeV-$\gamma$.
124:
125: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we discuss the
126: classical kinematics in the dS spacetime. Conservation laws of
127: momentum and angular momentum are obtained along the geodesics.
128: Section 3 is devoted to the investigation of the quantum
129: kinematics in the dS spacetime. By solving equations of motion of
130: a free particle, we present a remarkable dispersion relation for
131: free particles in the dS spacetime, which includes degrees of
132: freedom of angular momentum and spin. In Section 4, by taking
133: effects of a tiny but nonzero positive cosmological constant into
134: account, we show that the theoretic threshold is above the
135: energies of all the observed UHECR events. Similar discussion is
136: made for the TeV-$\gamma$ in Section 5. In the end, we present
137: conclusions and remarks.
138:
139:
140:
141: \section{Classical kinematics}
142:
143: The dS spacetime can be realized as a four dimensional
144: pseudo-sphere imbedded in the five dimensional flat space
145:
146: \begin{equation}\label{xi}
147: \begin{array}{l}
148: \displaystyle
149: \left(\xi^0)^2-(\xi^1)^2-(\xi^2)^2-(\xi^3)^2-(\xi^5\right)^2=-\frac{1}{\lambda}~,\\[5mm]
150: ds^2=\left(d\xi^0)^2-(d\xi^1)^2-(d\xi^2)^2-(d\xi^3)^2-(d\xi^5\right)^2~,
151: \end{array}
152: \end{equation}
153: where $\lambda$ is the Riemannian curvature of the dS spacetime.
154: It is obvious that the above equations are invariant under the
155: action of the de Sitter group $SO(1,~4)$. The coordinates
156: ${\xi^{\mu}}$ ($\mu=0,~1,~2,~3,~5$) are related to the Beltrami
157: coordinates $x^i$ $(i=0,~1,~2,~3)$ through the relation
158: %
159: \begin{equation}\label{xi-x}
160: x^i=\frac{\xi^i}{\sqrt{\lambda}\xi^5}~,~~~~~(\xi^5\not=0)~.
161: \end{equation}
162: Then, in the Beltrami coordinate, we can write the dS spacetime
163: as\cite{wulixuebao-1,1979-6}
164:
165: \begin{equation}\label{sigma}
166: \begin{array}{l}
167: \sigma\equiv\sigma(x,~x)=1-\lambda\eta_{ij}x^ix^j>0~,\\[3mm]
168: \displaystyle ds^2=\left(\frac{\eta_{ij}}{\sigma}+\frac{\lambda\eta_{ir}\eta_{js}x^rx^s}
169: {\sigma^2}\right)dx^idx^j~,
170: \end{array}
171: \end{equation}
172: where $\eta_{ij}={\rm diag}(1,~-1,~-1,~-1)$ is the Minkowski
173: metric. Transformations of $x^i$ acted by $SO(1,~4)$ can be
174: expressed as follows,
175:
176: \begin{equation}
177: \begin{array}{l} \label{x-x-tilde}
178: x^i\rightarrow\tilde{x}^i=\sigma(b,~b)^{1\over2}\sigma(b,~x)^{-1}(x^j-b^j)D^i_j~,\\
179: [0.5cm]
180: D^i_j=L^i_j+\lambda\left(\sigma(b,~b)+\sigma(b,~b)^{1\over2}\right)^{-1}\eta_{kl}b^lb^iL^k_j~,\\
181: [0.5cm] L\equiv(L^i_j)~~\in SO(3,~1)~,\\
182: [0.5cm]\sigma(b,~b)>0~,
183: \end{array}
184: \end{equation}
185: where $(b^i)$ is an arbitrary point in the Beltrami dS spacetime.
186: We can define the five dimensional angular momentum $M^{\mu\nu}$
187: of a free particle with mass $m_0$ as the form
188: %
189: \begin{equation}\label{angular}
190: M^{\mu\nu}=m_0\left(\xi^{\mu}\frac{d\xi^{\nu}}{ds}-\xi^{\nu}\frac
191: {d\xi^{\mu}}{ds}\right)~,
192: \end{equation}
193: where $s$ is a parameter along the geodesic. In the dS spacetime,
194: there is no translation invariance and so that one can not
195: introduce a momentum vector. However, it should be noticed that,
196: at least somehow, we may define a counterpart of the momentum $P$
197: for a free particle in the dS spacetime
198: %
199: \begin{equation}
200: \label{momentum}
201: P^i\equiv\sqrt{\lambda}M^{5i}=m\sigma^{-1}\frac{dx^i}{ds}~,~~~~
202: (i=0,~1,~2,~3)~.
203: \end{equation}
204: In the same manner, the counterparts of the four dimensional
205: angular momentum $J^{ij}$ can be assigned as
206: %
207: \begin{equation}
208: \label{angular-mn} J^{ij}\equiv M^{ij} =
209: x^iP^j-x^jP^i=m\sigma^{-1}\left(x^i\frac{dx^j}{ds}-x^j\frac{dx^i}{ds}\right)~.
210: \end{equation}
211: It is not difficult to show that, along the geodesics, the above
212: defined momentum and angular momentum are invariant,
213: %
214: \begin{equation}\label{conserve-P}
215: \frac{dP^i}{ds}=0~, ~~~~~\frac{dJ^{ij}}{ds}=0~.
216: \end{equation}
217: In fact, these are the equations of geodesic in the dS spacetime.
218: From Eq. (\ref{conserve-P}), we get, for a free particle,
219: %
220: \begin{equation}
221: \frac{dx^\alpha}{dx^0}={\rm constant}~,~~~~~~(\alpha=1,~2,~3)~.
222: \end{equation}
223: The fact tells us that the Beltrami coordinate can be considered
224: to be an inertial frame\cite{kexuetongbao} as the Cartesian
225: coordinate in the Minkowski spacetime. We notice that there is a
226: subgroup $SO(4)$ of the de Sitter one $SO(1,4)$, which consists of
227: spatial transformations among $x^\alpha$. It is easy to show that
228: $\xi^0(\equiv\sigma(x,x)^{-1/2}x^0)$ is invariant under the
229: spatial transformations. Thus, we can say two spacelike events
230: are simultaneous if they satisfy
231: %
232: \begin{equation}
233: \label{simultaneous} \sigma(x,~x)^{-\frac{1}{2}}x^0=\xi^0={\rm
234: constant}~.
235: \end{equation}
236: Therefore, it is convenient to discuss physics of the dS spacetime
237: in the coordinate $(\xi^0,~x^\alpha)$. In this coordinate, the
238: metric can be rewritten into the form
239:
240: \begin{equation}
241: ds^2=\frac{d\xi^0d\xi^0}{1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0}-(1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0)
242: \left[\frac{d\rho^2}{(1+\lambda\rho^2)^2}
243: +\frac{\rho^2}{1+\lambda\rho^2}d\Omega^2\right]~,
244: \end{equation}
245: where $\rho^2\equiv\Sigma{x^{\alpha}x^{\alpha}}$ and $d\Omega^2$
246: denotes the metric on 2-dimensional sphere $S^2$.\\
247: If a proper time $\tau$ is introduced as
248: %
249: \begin{equation}
250: \tau\equiv
251: \frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\sinh^{-1}(\sqrt{\lambda}\xi^0)~,
252: \end{equation}
253: one would get a Friedman-Robertson-Walker like metric,
254: %
255: \begin{equation}
256: ds^2=d\tau ^2 -\cosh^2(\sqrt{\lambda}\tau)
257: \left[\frac{d\rho^2}{(1+\lambda\rho^2)^2}
258: +\frac{\rho^2}{1+\lambda\rho^2}d\Omega^2\right]~.
259: \end{equation}
260:
261: In terms of the five dimensional angular momentum $M^{\mu\nu}$, we
262: can construct an invariant under the de Sitter transformations for
263: a free particle\cite{wulixuebao-2},
264: %
265: \begin{equation}
266: \begin{array}{c}
267: \label{casimir}
268: m^2_0=\displaystyle\frac{\lambda}{2}M^{\mu\nu}M_{\mu\nu}=E^2-{\bf
269: P}^2+\frac{\lambda}{2} J^{ij}J_{ij}~,\\ [0.5cm]
270: E=P^0~,~~~~{\bf
271: P}=(P^1,~P^2,~P^3)~.
272: \end{array}
273: \end{equation}
274: However it should be noticed that the $P^i$ defined in this way is
275: not a four dimensional vector but the component of the five
276: dimensional angular momentum $M^{\mu\nu}$.
277:
278: \section{Quantum kinematics}
279:
280: It is natural to realize the five dimensional angular momentum
281: $M_{\mu\nu}$ as infinitesimal generators of the de Sitter group
282: $SO(1,~4)~$
283: %
284: \begin{equation}
285: \label{L-operator}
286: M^{\mu\nu}=-i\left(\xi^{\mu}\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi_{\nu}}-\xi^{\nu}
287: \frac{\partial}{\partial\xi_{\mu}}\right)~.
288: \end{equation}
289: The de Sitter invariant, or the Casimir operator can be used to
290: express the one-particle states in the dS spacetime
291: %
292: \begin{equation}
293: \label{invariant}
294: \left(\frac{\lambda}{2}M^{\mu\nu}M_{\mu\nu}-m^2_0\right)\Phi(\xi^0,x^{\alpha})=0~,
295: \end{equation}
296: where the $\Phi(\xi^0,x^{\alpha})$ denotes a scalar field or a
297: component of vector fields with a given spin $s$.
298:
299:
300: In the coordinates $(\xi^0,~x^{\alpha})$~, we can rewrite the
301: Casimir operator as the following form
302: %
303: \begin{eqnarray}
304: \frac{\lambda}{2}M^{\mu\nu}M_{\mu\nu}&=&-\left(
305: 1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0
306: \right)\partial_{\xi^0}^2-4\lambda\xi^0\partial_{\xi^0} \nonumber \\
307: &&+\left( 1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0 \right)^{-1}\left( 1+\lambda\rho^2
308: \right)^2\left[ \partial^2_\rho+2\rho^{-1}\partial_\rho \right] \\
309: &&+\left( 1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0 \right)^{-1}\left( 1+\lambda\rho^2
310: \right)\rho^{-2} \left(\partial^2_{\bf u}-s(s+1)\right) ~,
311: \nonumber
312: \end{eqnarray}
313: where ${\bf u}{\bf u}^{\prime}=1$ and $\partial^2_{\bf u}$ denotes
314: the Laplace operator on $S^2$.
315: %\newline
316:
317:
318: To solve the equation of motion, we write the field
319: $\Phi(\xi^0,x^{\alpha})$ into the form
320: \[
321: \Phi(\xi^0,\rho,{\bf u})=T(\xi^0)U(\rho)Y_{lm}(\bf u)~.
322: \]
323: Thus, we transform the equation of motion into
324: \cite{ds-paper-3,wulixuebao-2},
325: %
326: \begin{eqnarray}
327: &&
328: \left[(1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0)^2\partial^2_{\xi^0}+4\lambda\xi^0(1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0)
329: \partial_{\xi^0}+m_0^2(1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0)+(\varepsilon^2-m_0^2)\right]T(\xi^0)=0,
330: \nonumber \\[0.5cm]
331: && \left[\partial^2_{\rho}+
332: \displaystyle\frac{2}{\rho}\partial_\rho-\left[\frac{m_0^2-\varepsilon^2}
333: {(1+\lambda\rho^2)^2}+\frac{l(l+1)+s(s+1)}{\rho^2(1+\lambda\rho^2)}\right]
334: \right]U(\rho)=0, \nonumber\\[0.5cm]
335: && \left[\partial^2_{\bf u}+l(l+1)\right]Y_{lm}({\bf u})=0,
336: \end{eqnarray}
337: where $Y_{lm}({\bf u})$ is the spherical harmonic function and
338: $\varepsilon$ is a constant.
339:
340:
341: Solutions of timelike part of the field are of the forms
342:
343: \begin{equation}
344: T(\xi^0)\sim\left(1+\lambda\xi^0\xi^0\right)^{-1/2} \cdot\left\{
345: \begin{array}{l}
346: P_{\nu}^{\mu}(i\sqrt{\lambda}\xi^0)~, \\
347: \\
348: Q_{\nu}^{\mu}(i\sqrt{\lambda}\xi^0) ~,%
349: \end{array}
350: \right.
351: \end{equation}
352: where $\mu,~\nu~$ satisfy
353: \newline
354: \begin{equation}
355: \begin{array}{l}
356: \nu(\nu+1)=2-\lambda^{-1}m_0^2 ~, \\
357: \mu^2= 1+\lambda^{-1}(\varepsilon^2-m_0^2) ~.%
358: \end{array}%
359: \end{equation}
360: For the radial equation of the field, we can write the solutions
361: as the form
362: %
363: \begin{equation}
364: U(\rho)\sim\rho^l(1+\lambda\rho^2)^{k/2}F\left(\frac{1}{2}(l+k+s+1),~\frac{1}{2}
365: (l+k+s),~l+s+\frac{3}{2};~-\lambda\rho^2\right)~,
366: \end{equation}
367: where $k$ denotes the radial quantum number
368: $$k^2-2k-\lambda^{-1}(\varepsilon^2-m_0^2)=0~.$$
369: To be normalizable, the hypergeometric function in the radial part
370: of the wavefunction has to break off, leading to the quantum
371: condition
372:
373: \begin{equation}
374: \frac{l+k+s}{2}=-n~,~~~~~(n\in \mathbf{N})~.
375: \end{equation}
376: Then, we obtain the dispersion relation for a free particle
377:
378: \begin{equation}
379: \label{dispersion2}
380: E^2=m_0^2+\varepsilon'^2+\lambda(2n+l+s)(2n+l+s+2)~.
381: \end{equation}
382:
383:
384:
385: \section{UHECR threshold anomaly}
386:
387: Until today, we have observed\cite{data1}-\cite{data5} hundreds of
388: events with energies above $10^{19}$eV and about 20 events above
389: $10^{20}$eV, which are above the GZK threshold. In principle,
390: photopion production with the cosmic microwave background
391: radiation photons should decrease the energies of these protons to
392: the level below the corresponding threshold. In this section, we
393: discuss the UHECR threshold anomaly in the covariant framework of
394: kinematics in dS spacetime set up in the preceding sections.
395:
396: We consider the head-on collision between a soft photon of energy
397: $\epsilon$, momentum ${\bf q}$ and a high energy particle $m_1$ of
398: energy $E_1$, momentum ${\bf p}_1$, which leads to the production
399: of two particles $m_2,~m_3$ with energies $E_2$, $E_3$ and
400: momentums ${\bf p}_2$, ${\bf p}_3$, respectively. From the energy
401: and momentum conservation laws, we have
402:
403: \begin{equation}\label{threshold1}
404: \begin{array}{c}
405: E_1+\epsilon=E_2+E_3~, \\[0.4cm]
406: p_1-q=p_2+p_3~.
407: \end{array}
408: \end{equation}
409: In the C.M. frame, $m_2$ and $m_3$ are at rest at threshold, so
410: they have the same velocity in the lab frame and there exists the
411: following relation
412:
413: \begin{equation}
414: \label{p3p2} \frac{p_2}{p_3}=\frac{m_2}{m_3}~.
415: \end{equation}
416: It is convenient to use the approximated formulae of dispersion
417: relations (\ref{dispersion2}) for the soft photons and the ultra
418: high energy particles
419: %
420: \begin{eqnarray}\label{dispersion-app}
421: &&\epsilon^2=q^2+\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}~,\\[0.4cm]
422: &&E_i=\sqrt{m^2_i+p^2_i+\lambda_i^{*}}\simeq
423: p_i+\frac{m^2_i}{2p_i}+\frac{\lambda^{*}_i}{2p_i}~,~~(i=1,~2,~3)~.
424: \end{eqnarray}
425: where
426: $~\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}\equiv\lambda(l_\gamma+2n_\gamma+1)(l_\gamma+2n_\gamma+3)
427: \approx\lambda {l_{\gamma}}(l_{\gamma}+1)~$ and
428: $~\lambda_{i}^{*}\equiv\lambda(l_i+2n_i+s_i)(l_i+2n_i+s_i+2)\approx\lambda
429: {l_{i}}(l_{i}+1)~$ with the conjecture that $~l \gg n,~s~$.
430:
431:
432: The obtained threshold can be expressed as the form
433:
434: \begin{equation}
435: \label{threshold0}\displaystyle E_{{\rm
436: ~th},~\lambda}\simeq\frac{(m_{2}+m_{3})^2-m_{1}^2+\lambda_{2}^{*}
437: \left(1+\frac{m_3}{m_2}\right)+\lambda_{3}^{*}\left(1+\frac{m_2}{m_3}\right)-
438: \lambda_{1}^{*}}{2\left(\epsilon+\sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
439: \end{equation}
440: The usual GZK threshold could be recovered when the parameter
441: $\lambda^*$, which is dependent on the cosmological constant, runs
442: to zero.
443:
444: The conservation law of the angular momentum gives a constraint on
445: the parameters $\lambda^*$,
446: %
447: $$
448: \lambda^{*}_{1} + \lambda^{*}_{\gamma} + 2\lambda{\bf
449: L}_1\cdot{\bf L}_{\gamma} = \lambda^{*}_{2} + \lambda^{*}_{3} +
450: 2\lambda{\bf L}_2\cdot{\bf L}_3~.
451: $$
452: Making use of the relation, we can rewrite the $\lambda^*$
453: dependent terms of the threshold as the following
454:
455: \begin{equation}
456: \frac{\lambda^{*}_{2}\frac{m_3}{m_2}+\lambda^{*}_{3}\frac{m_2}{m_3}+\lambda^{*}_{\gamma}
457: +2\lambda{\bf L}_1\cdot{\bf L}_{\gamma}-2\lambda{\bf L}_2\cdot{\bf
458: L}_3}
459: {2\left(\epsilon+\sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
460: \end{equation}
461: If $\lambda^{*}_2$ and $\lambda^{*}_3$ take value of the same
462: order with $\lambda^{*}_{\gamma}$ (less than the square of energy
463: of a soft photon), the $\lambda^*$ dependent terms can be
464: omitted\cite{0307439}. We will investigate the case of
465: $\lambda^{*}_2+\lambda^{*}_3 \gg \lambda^{*}_{\gamma}~$, and the
466: threshold $(\ref{threshold0})$ is of the form
467:
468: \begin{equation}
469: \label{threshold}\displaystyle E_{{\rm
470: ~th},~\lambda}\simeq\frac{(m_{2}+m_{3})^2-m_{1}^2+
471: \lambda^{*}_{2}\frac{m_3}{m_2}+\lambda^{*}_{3}\frac{m_2}{m_3}-
472: 2\lambda{\bf L}_2\cdot{\bf L}_3}{2\left(\epsilon+
473: \sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
474: \end{equation}
475:
476: \vspace*{0.5cm}
477:
478: Now, we can study the photopion production processes of the UHECR
479: interaction with the CMBR
480: $$p+\gamma\rightarrow p+\pi~.$$
481: %
482: The corresponding threshold for this process is given by
483:
484: \begin{equation}
485: \label{UHECR-threshold}\displaystyle E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm
486: ~th},~\lambda}\simeq\frac{(m_{N}+m_{\pi})^2-m_{N}^2+
487: \lambda^{*}_{N}\frac{m_{\pi}}{m_N}+\lambda^{*}_{\pi}\frac{m_N}{m_{\pi}}-
488: 2\lambda{\bf L}_{N}\cdot{\bf L}_{\pi}}{2\left(\epsilon+
489: \sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
490: \end{equation}
491: %
492: To show the behavior of the threshold in the $\lambda^*$-parameter
493: space clearly, we should discuss some limit cases in detail.
494:
495: In the case that the out-going nucleon has zero angular momentum,
496: the threshold $(\ref{UHECR-threshold})$ reduces as
497:
498: \begin{equation}
499: \label{UHECR-pi}\displaystyle E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm
500: ~th},~\lambda,\pi}\simeq\frac{(m_{N}+m_{\pi})^2-m_{N}^2+
501: \lambda^{*}_{\pi}\frac{m_N}{m_{\pi}}}{2\left(\epsilon+
502: \sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
503: \end{equation}
504: %
505: We give a plot for the dependence of the threshold $E^{\rm
506: UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,\pi}$ on the cosmological constant and
507: angular momentum (the in-going photon and out-going pion) in {\bf
508: FIG.1}.
509: %
510: \begin{center}
511: \includegraphics[height=95mm,width=100mm]{proton-1.eps}
512: \end{center}
513: {\bf FIG.1}~~~~ {\scriptsize The cosmological constant and angular
514: momentum (of in-going soft photon and out-going pion) dependence
515: of the threshold $E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,\pi}$ in the
516: interaction between the UHECR protons and the CMBR photons
517: ($\lambda^{*}_{\pi}$ in unit of $m_{\pi}^2/10$)~.}
518: %
519:
520: In the case that the out-going pion has zero angular momentum, the
521: UHECR threshold takes the form
522:
523: \begin{equation}
524: \label{UHECR-pn}\displaystyle E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm
525: ~th},~\lambda,N}\simeq\frac{(m_{N}+m_{\pi})^2-m_{N}^2+
526: \lambda^{*}_{N}\frac{m_{\pi}}{m_{N}}}{2\left(\epsilon+
527: \sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
528: \end{equation}
529: %
530: We give a plot for the dependence of the threshold $E^{\rm
531: UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,N}$ on the cosmological constant and
532: angular momentum (the in-going soft photon and out-going nucleon)
533: in {\bf FIG.2}.
534: %
535: \begin{center}
536: \includegraphics[height=95mm,width=100mm]{proton-2.eps}
537: \end{center}
538: {\bf FIG.2}~~~~ {\scriptsize The cosmological constant and angular
539: momentum (of the in-going soft photon and out-going nucleon)
540: dependence of the threshold $E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,N}$
541: in the interaction between the UHECR protons and the CMBR photons
542: ($\lambda^{*}_{N}$ in unit of $m_{N}^2/10$)~.}
543:
544: %
545: Finally, if the out-going pion and nucleon has the same angular
546: momentum, the UHECR threshold can be expressed as the following
547: form
548:
549: \begin{equation}
550: \label{UHECR-pnpi}\displaystyle E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm
551: ~th},\lambda,N\pi}\simeq\frac{(m_{N}+m_{\pi})^2-m_{N}^2+
552: \lambda^{*}_{N}(\frac{m_{N}}{m_{\pi}}+\frac{m_{\pi}}{m_{N}}-2)}{2\left(\epsilon+
553: \sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda_{\gamma}^{*}}\right)}~.
554: \end{equation}
555: %
556: We give a plot for the dependence of the threshold $E^{\rm
557: UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,N\pi}$ on the cosmological constant and
558: angular momentum (the out-going nucleon and pion) in {\bf FIG.3}.
559:
560:
561: From the above discussion, we know that a tiny but nonzero
562: cosmological constant may provide indeed sufficient corrections to
563: the primary predicted threshold\cite{GZK}. For the observed
564: cosmological constant (which is around the level of $10^{-85}{\rm
565: GeV}^2$), if the CMBR possesses a quantum number $l_{\gamma}$ of
566: the order of $10^{30}$, the threshold will be above the energies
567: of all those observed UHECR particles. The predicted threshold
568: should be upgraded to a more reasonable level. Now we can say that
569: a possible origin of the cosmic ray threshold anomaly has been
570: got. It is the cosmological constant that increases the GZK
571: cut-off to a level above the observed UHECR events.
572: \begin{center}
573: \includegraphics[height=95mm,width=100mm]{proton-3.eps}
574: \end{center}
575: {\bf FIG.3}~~~~ {\scriptsize The cosmological constant and angular
576: momentum (of the out-going nucleon and pion) dependence of the
577: threshold $E^{\rm UHECR}_{{\rm th},~\lambda,N\pi}$ in the
578: interaction between the UHECR protons and the CMBR photons
579: ($\lambda^{*}_{N}=\lambda^{*}_{\pi}$ in unit of $m_{\pi}^2/10$)~.}
580:
581:
582: \section{TeV-$\gamma$ threshold anomaly}
583:
584: The second paradox for the cosmic ray comes from the fact that
585: experiments detected 20TeV photons from Mrk 501 (a BL Lac object
586: at a distance of 150Mpc). Similar to the UHECR case, due to the
587: interaction with the IR background photons, the 20TeV photons
588: should have disappeared before arrival at the ground-based
589: detections. Parallel to the analysis of UHECR in the previous
590: section, we discuss the TeV-$\gamma$ threshold anomaly in the
591: following.
592:
593: For the pair production process
594: $$\gamma+\gamma\rightarrow e^++e^-~,$$
595: we obtain a threshold by taking $m_1$ in the equation
596: $(\ref{threshold})$ to be zero,
597:
598: \begin{equation}
599: \label{Tev-threshold} E^{\gamma}_{{\rm
600: ~th},~\lambda}\simeq\frac{4m_e^2+\lambda^{*}_{e^{+}}+
601: \lambda^{*}_{e^{-}}-2\lambda{\bf L}_{e^+} \cdot{\bf
602: L}_{e^-}}{2(\epsilon+\sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda^{*}_{\gamma}})}~.
603: \end{equation}
604: If one of the out-going particles possesses zero angular momentum,
605: the corresponding threshold is reduced to the form
606:
607: \begin{equation}
608: \label{Tev-threshold} E^{\gamma}_{{\rm
609: th},\lambda,e}\simeq\frac{2m_e^2+\lambda^{*}_{e}/2}
610: {\epsilon+\sqrt{\epsilon^2-\lambda^{*}_{\gamma}}}~.
611: \end{equation}
612: %
613: We present a plot of the dependence of the threshold
614: $E^{\gamma}_{{\rm th},\lambda,e}$ on the cosmological constant and
615: angular momentum (the out-going electron or positron) in {\bf
616: FIG.4}.
617: %
618: \begin{center}
619: \includegraphics[height=95mm,width=100mm]{gamma-1.eps}
620: \end{center}
621: {\bf FIG.4}~~~~ {\scriptsize The cosmological constant and angular
622: momentum ( of the in-going soft photon and out-going electron)
623: dependence of the threshold $E^{\gamma}_{{\rm th},\lambda,e}$ in
624: the interaction between the TeV-$\gamma$ and the IR background
625: photons ($\lambda^{*}_{e}$ in unit of $m_{e}^2/10$)~.}
626:
627:
628: From the above plot, we see that the threshold $E^{\gamma}_{{\rm
629: th},\lambda}$ is also quite sensitive to the small positive
630: cosmological constant. By taking into account the corrections
631: which are dependent on the cosmological constant and angular
632: momentum of interacting particles, we get a new predicted
633: threshold. And then the threshold anomaly disappears.
634:
635:
636: \section{Conclusions and remarks}
637: In this paper, we discussed kinematics in the dS spacetime. The
638: kinematic invariance group in the dS spacetime is $SO(1,4)$
639: instead of the Poincar\'{e} one in the Minkowski sapcetime.
640: Kinematics, which is based on the de Sitter group $SO(1,4)$, was
641: set up formally. It should be noticed that the dispersion
642: relation for a free particle in the dS spacetime is related with
643: degrees of freedom of angular momentum and spin. With the help of
644: this deformed dispersion relation, and thanks to the positive
645: cosmological constant, a possible origin of the threshold
646: anomalies was proposed naturally.
647:
648: We would like to point out that, if the cosmological constant can
649: vary notably in different period of the Universe (at least in some
650: scenarios it is), we may get a higher threshold for the UHECR
651: propagating in the early Universe. And this could be a good news
652: for the ``top-down" scenario of the UHECR.
653: %
654: %
655: \newline
656: \newline
657: {\large\bf Acknowledgement:}\\
658: We would like to thank Prof. H. Y. Guo and C. J. Zhu for useful
659: discussion. The work was supported partly by the Natural Science
660: Foundation of China. One of us (C.B.G.) is supported by grants
661: through the ICTS (USTC) from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
662:
663: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
664:
665: %origin of UHECR
666: \bibitem{acc1} E. Fermi, Phys. Rev. {\bf 75}, 1169 (1949).
667: \bibitem{acc2} P. L. Biermann, J. Phys. G. {\bf 23}, 1 (1997).
668: \bibitem{top1} P. Bhattacharjee and G. Sigl, Phys. Rept. {\bf
669: 327}, 109 (2000).
670: %
671: %GZK effect
672: \bibitem{GZK} K. Greisen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 16}, 748 (1966);
673: G. T. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuz'min, JETP Lett. {\bf 4}, 78 (1966).
674: \bibitem{GZK1} F. W. Stecker, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 21}, 1016
675: (1968).
676: %
677: %experiments on UHECR and TeV-\gamma
678: \bibitem{data1} M. Takeda {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1163 (1998).
679: \bibitem{data2} M. Takeda {\it et al}., Astrophys. J. {\bf 522}, 225 (1999).
680: \bibitem{data3} N. Hayashida {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 3491 (1994).
681: \bibitem{data4} D. J. Bird {\it et al}., Astrophys. J. {\bf 441}, 144 (1995); D. J. Bird {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 71}, 3401 (1993); D. J. Bird {\it et al}., Astrophys. J. {\bf 424}, 491 (1994).
682: \bibitem{data5} M. A. Lawrence, R. J. O. Reid, and A. A. Watson, J. Phys. G {\bf 17}, 733 (1991).
683: \bibitem{data6} M. Harwit, R. J. Protheroe, and P. L. Biermann,
684: Astrophys. J. {\bf 524}, L91 (1999).
685: %
686: %DSR works
687: \bibitem{DSR1} G. Amelino-Camelia, Nature {\bf 418}, 34 (2002).
688:
689: \bibitem{DSR2} J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88},
690: 190403 (2002).
691: \bibitem{loren2} S. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D {\bf
692: 59}, 116008 (1999).
693: \bibitem{loren3} R. Aloisio, P. Blasi, P. L. Ghia, and A. F. Grillo, Phys.
694: Rev. D {\bf 62}, 053010 (2000).
695: \bibitem{loren4} O. Bertolami and C. S. Carvalho, Phys. Rev. D
696: {\bf 61}, 103002 (2000).
697: \bibitem{loren5} H. Sato, arXiv: astro-ph/0005218.
698: \bibitem{loren6} T. Kifune, Astrophys. J. {\bf 518}, L21
699: (1999).
700: \bibitem{loren7} W. Kluzniak, arXiv: astro-ph/9905308.
701: \bibitem{loren8} R. J. Protheroe and H. Meyer, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
702: 493}, 1 (2000).
703:
704:
705: \bibitem{constant-super-1} A. G. Riess {\it et al}., Astron. J. {\bf 116}, 1009 (1998).
706: \bibitem{constant-super-2} S. Perlmutter {\it et al}., Astrophys. J. {\bf 517}, 565 (1999).
707: \bibitem{costant-cmbr} P. de Bernardis {\it et al}., Nature {\bf 404}, 955 (2000).
708: \bibitem{ds-paper-1} E. Witten, arXiv: hep-th/0106109.
709: \bibitem{ds-paper-2} A. Strominger, JHEP {\bf 0110}, 034 (2001).
710: \bibitem{ds-paper-3} Z. Chang and C. B. Guan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 17}, 4591 (2002).
711: \bibitem{origin1} M. Lemoine and G. Sigl (Eds.), {\em Physics and
712: Astrophysics of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays}, Lecture Notes in
713: Physics, Springer, Berlin (2001).
714: \bibitem{inflation} A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, {\em Cosmological Inflation
715: and Large Scale Structure}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
716: (2000).
717: \bibitem{wmap} C. L. Bennett {\em et al.}, Astrophys. J. Suppl. {\bf 148}, 1 (2003); H. V.
718: Peiris {\em et al.}, Astrophys. J. Suppl. {\bf 148}, 213 (2003).
719: \bibitem{origin3} H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and A. Staudt, {\em
720: Non-accelerator Particle Physics}, IOP Publishing Ltd., London
721: (1995).
722: \bibitem{wulixuebao-1} Q. K. Lu, Z. L. Zou, and H. Y. Guo, Acta
723: Physica Sinica (in Chinese) {\bf 23}, 225 (1974).
724: \bibitem{1979-6} Z. L. Zou {\it et al}., Science in China (in Chinese) No.
725: 6, 588 (1979).
726: \bibitem{kexuetongbao} H. Y. Guo, Commun. Science (in Chinese) {\bf
727: 22}, 487 (1977).
728: \bibitem{wulixuebao-2} G. Y. Li and H. Y. Guo, Acta
729: Physica Sinica (in Chinese) {\bf 31}, 1501 (1982).
730: %
731: %\bibitem{spin} H. Bacry, {\em Lectures on Group Theory and
732: %Particle Theory}, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Ltd.,
733: %London (1977).
734: %
735: \bibitem{UHECR} G. Amelino-Camelia and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 036005 (2001).
736: \bibitem{solution1} J. M. Carmona, J. L. Cort$\acute{{\rm e}}$s, J.
737: Gamboa, and F. M$\acute{{\rm e}}$ndez, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 565},
738: 222 (2003).
739:
740: \bibitem{0307439} Z. Chang, S. X. Chen, and C. B. Guan, arXiv: astro-ph/0307439.
741: \end{thebibliography}
742: \end{document}
743: