1: %MS#3617
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
4: \documentclass{aa}
5: %\usepackage{txfonts}
6: \usepackage{psfig}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: % \thesaurus{12.03.4; %cosmology: theory
11: % 12.03.1; %cosmic microwave background
12: % 11.09.3; %intergalactic medium
13: % 12.12.1} %large-scale structure
14:
15: \title{A halo approach to the evaluation of
16: the cross-correlation between the SZ sky and galaxy survey}
17:
18:
19: \author{Yan Qu and Xiang-Ping Wu}
20:
21: \offprints{Y. Qu}
22: \mail{quyan@class2.bao.ac.cn}
23:
24: \institute{National Astronomical Observatories,
25: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China}
26:
27:
28: \date{Received 00 February, 2003; accepted}
29:
30: \titlerunning{SZ-galaxy cross-correlation}
31:
32: \abstract{
33: Using a purely analytic approach to gaseous and dark matter halos,
34: we study the cross-correlation between the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ)
35: sky and galaxy survey under flat sky approximation,
36: in an attempt to acquire the redshift information
37: of the SZ map. The problem can be greatly simplified when it
38: is noticed that the signals of the SZ-galaxy correlation
39: arise only from hot gas and galaxies inside the same
40: massive halos (i.e. clusters), and field galaxies
41: make almost no contribution to the cross-correlation.
42: Under the assumption that both the hot gas and galaxies trace
43: the common gravitational potential of dark halos,
44: we calculate the expected cross SZ-galaxy power spectra
45: for the WMAP/Planck SZ maps and the SDSS galaxy sample
46: at small scales $100<l<1000$.
47: It turns out, however, that it is not presently feasible to
48: measure such small angular cross power spectra because
49: of the high noise levels at $l>400$ with the WMAP/Planck experiments.
50: Future SZ observations with better angular resolutions and
51: sufficiently wide sky coverages
52: will be needed if this technique is applied for the
53: statistical measurement of redshift distribution of the SZ sources.
54:
55: \keywords{cosmology: theory --- cosmic microwave background ---
56: intergalactic medium --- large-scale structure of universe}
57: }
58: \maketitle
59:
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: Most of the baryons in the local universe exist in the form of
64: warm-hot intergalactic medium with temperature of $T\sim 10^5-10^7$K
65: as a result of gravitationally driven shocks and
66: adiabatical compression when they fall into large-scale structures and
67: collapsed dark matter halos (e.g. Cen \& Ostriker 1999; Dav\'e et al. 2001).
68: In the latter case, the very hot baryons gravitationally bound
69: in massive halos such as groups and clusters usually manifest themselves by
70: strong diffuse X-ray sources in terms of bremmstrahlung emission,
71: which are directly detectable with current X-ray instruments.
72: Moreover, the energetic electrons of the hot gas also interact
73: the passing cosmic microwave
74: background (CMB) photons through the so-called Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ)
75: effect, giving rise to a subtle change in the CMB spectrum.
76: Current SZ measurements of known clusters at high signal-to-noise
77: are now routine (e.g. Carlstrom et al. 2002) and recent detection of
78: the excess power relative to primordial CMB anisotropy at arcminute scales
79: has been successfully attributed to the statistical signals of
80: the thermal SZ effect (Mason et al. 2003; Bond et al. 2003; Komatsu \& Seljak
81: 2002).
82:
83:
84: However, both X-ray and SZ measurements contain no information
85: about the redshift distributions of the hot baryons and their
86: host groups/clusters. Spectroscopic follow-up observations
87: should be made to complement our knowledge of the location
88: and evolution of the hot baryons and their host halos. It has been
89: realized that a more practical and powerful approach to extracting
90: the distance information from the X-ray and SZ maps
91: is perhaps to cross-correlate the X-ray and SZ maps with the
92: existing galaxy catalogs or ongoing deep galaxy surveys
93: (e.g. Seljak, Burwell \& Pen 2000; Zhang \& Pen 2001;2003;
94: Zhang, Pen \& Wang 2002).
95: In particular, the problem can be greatly simplified if we notice
96: that the signals of the cross-correlation between the SZ (or X-ray)
97: map and galaxy survey arise primarily from cluster galaxies, and field
98: galaxies make almost no contribution to the SZ(or X-ray)-galaxy
99: correlation. This permits a straightforward calculation of
100: the power spectrum of the SZ(or X-ray)-galaxy correlation from
101: an analytic model of dark halo abundance,
102: i.e., the Press \& Schechter (1974; PS) formalism,
103: along with a reasonable prescription of galaxy and gas distributions
104: inside a given halo of mass $M$ at redshift $z$. For the latter,
105: one can adopt either the simplest self-similar NFW-like profile
106: suggested by numerical simulations (Navarro, Frenk \& White 1995; NFW),
107: or the empirically motivated density profiles such as
108: the King model or $\beta$-model, in combination with
109: the halo occupation distribution
110: (see Cooray \& Sheth 2003 for a recent review).
111: In this paper, we explore the power spectrum of the SZ-galaxy
112: cross-correlation based purely on the halo approach. Similar
113: technique has been recently applied by Zhang \& Pen (2003)
114: to the study of the cross-correlation of the soft X-ray
115: background and galaxy survey and by Wu \& Xue (2003)
116: to the study of the auto-correlation of the soft X-ray background.
117: In their early work,
118: Zhang \& Pen (2001) also investigated the SZ-galaxy cross-correlation
119: using the so-called continuum field model, in which the gas distribution
120: in dark halos is given by a convolution of the dark matter distribution
121: with a Gaussian window function, while the matter fluctuation in
122: the highly non-linear regime (e.g. clusters) is calculated in terms of
123: the hyper-extended perturbation theory.
124:
125:
126: For the purpose of actual applications, we will calculate
127: the expected cross-correlation between
128: the SZ maps observed by WMAP/Planck and the galaxy survey
129: by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and assess the feasibility of
130: extracting the redshift information of the WMAP/Planck SZ maps using
131: this statistical approach.
132: Throughout this paper we adopt a flat cosmological model
133: ($\Lambda$CDM) with the best fit parameters determined by WMAP:
134: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$, $\Omega_M=0.27$, $h=0.71$,
135: $\Omega_b h^2=0.0224$, $\sigma_8=0.84$ and $n_s=0.93$
136:
137:
138:
139: \section{SZ-galaxy cross-correlation}
140:
141: \subsection{Properties of gaseous and dark matter halos}
142:
143: The thermal SZ effect along the direction ${\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}}$
144: due to the hot gas inside a halo can be evaluated following
145: %1,2
146: \begin{eqnarray}
147: \frac{\Delta T({\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}})}
148: {T_{\rm CMB}}&=& g(x)y({\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}});\\
149: y({\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}})&=&
150: \int N_e \sigma_T \left(\frac{k_BT}{m_e c^2}\right)\rm d\chi;\\
151: g(x)&=&\frac{x^2 e^x}{(e^x-1)^2}\left(4-x \coth\frac{x}{2}\right),
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: where $N_e$ and $T$ are the number density and temperature of
154: electrons, $x=h_p\nu/k_BT_{\rm CMB}$ is the dimensionless frequency,
155: $T_{\rm CMB}$ is the temperature of the present CMB,
156: and the integral is performed along the line of sight.
157: We specify the gas temperature in terms of virial theorem
158: %3
159: \begin{equation}
160: k_BT=1.39\;{\rm keV}\;f_T
161: \left(\frac{M}{10^{15}\;M_{\odot}}\right)^{2/3}
162: \left[h^2 E^2(z)\Delta_{\rm c}\right]^{1/3},
163: \end{equation}
164: where $\Delta_{\rm c}$ is the overdensity of dark matter with respect to
165: the critical value $\rho_{\rm crit}$, which is calculated using a fitting
166: formula given by Bryan \& Norman (1998) for $f_T=0.8$, and
167: $E^2(z)=\Omega_{\rm M}(1+z)^3+\Omega_{\Lambda}$.
168:
169: For simplicity we assume that both gas and galaxies
170: in massive halos trace the dark matter distribution such that
171: %5,6
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: N_e(r)&=&\frac{f_b}{\mu_e m_p}\Delta\rho_{\rm DM}(r);\\
174: \Delta N_{\rm gal}(r)&=&
175: A \Delta \rho_{\rm DM}(r),
176: \end{eqnarray}
177: in which $f_b$ is the universal baryon fraction,
178: $\mu_e=1.13$ is the mean electron weight,
179: $\Delta N_{\rm gal}(r)$ is the number density of galaxies,
180: and $A$ is a proportionality constant.
181: Indeed, this so-called self-similar model
182: provides a good approximation for the radial profiles of
183: gas and galaxies in dark halos if our focus is not on
184: the detailed physical processes of the gas and galaxies.
185: Unlike thermal X-ray emission which is governed by the
186: central gas content of massive dark halos such as groups
187: and clusters of galaxies, the thermal SZ effect is generated
188: by the hot gas distributed over whole halo regions.
189: Beyond the core regions the radial profiles of
190: gas and dark matter look roughly very similar in shape.
191: In recent years some physically motivated models have been
192: proposed for the density and temperature of the hot gas
193: in massive halos (e.g. Babul et al. 2002; Voit et al 2002;
194: Wu \& Xue 2002; etc.). One can easily extend our
195: formalism to inclusion of these gas profiles. Here we adopt the
196: universal density profile as suggested by NFW to describe
197: the dark matter distribution inside halos,
198: $\Delta\rho_{\rm DM}(r)=
199: \delta_{\rm ch}\rho_{\rm crit}/[(r/r_s)(1+r/r_s)^2]$,
200: and fix the free parameter using the empirical fitting formula found
201: by numerical simulations (Bullock et al. 2001):
202: $c=[9/(1+z)](M/2.1\times 10^{13} M_{\odot})^{-0.13}$, where
203: $c=r_{\rm vir}/r_{\rm s}$ is the so-called concentration parameter.
204:
205: In order to determine the constant $A$ in equation (6),
206: we need to know the mean galaxy
207: number for a given halo of mass $M$, i.e. the halo occupation
208: distribution, $N_{\rm gal}(M)$. We employ
209: the best fit analytic formulae of Sheth \& Diaferio (2001) for the
210: spiral [$N_{\rm gal,S}(M)$] and elliptical [$N_{\rm gal,E}(M)$]
211: galaxies based on the GIF simulations (Kauffmannn et al. 1999):
212: %7
213: \begin{eqnarray}
214: N_{\rm gal,S}(M)&=&(M/M_{\rm S})^{\alpha_S}+
215: 0.5e^{-4[\log(M/10^{11.75}M_{\sun})]^2}; \nonumber\\
216: N_{\rm gal,E}(M)&=&(M/M_{\rm E})^{\alpha_E}
217: e^{-(2\times10^{11}M_{\sun}/M)^2}; \nonumber\\
218: N_{\rm gal}(M)&=&N_{\rm gal,S}(M)+N_{\rm gal,E}(M),
219: \end{eqnarray}
220: where $M_{\rm S}=7\times10^{13}h^{-1}M_{\sun}$, $\alpha_{\rm S}=0.9$,
221: $M_{\rm E}=3\times10^{12}h^{-1}M_{\sun}$, and $\alpha_{\rm E}=0.75$.
222: The mean number density of galaxies is thus
223: %8
224: \begin{equation}
225: \overline{N}_{\rm gal}=\int N_{\rm gal}(M) \frac{d^2N}{dMdV} dM,
226: \end{equation}
227: where $d^2N/dMdV$ is the comoving number density
228: of dark halos (see below). Given the halo occupation
229: distribution, we are able to normalize the number density profile
230: of galaxies within a halo of mass $M$ following
231: %9
232: \begin{equation}
233: N_{\rm gal}(M)=\int \Delta N_{\rm gal}(r)dV.
234: \end{equation}
235: The integration above is made over whole cluster region out to
236: virial radius. This gives the proportionality constant $A$
237: in equation (6)
238: %10
239: \begin{equation}
240: A=\frac{N_{\rm gal}(M)}
241: {4\pi\delta_{\rm ch}\rho_{\rm crit}r_s^3[\ln(1+c)-c/(1+c)]},
242: \end{equation}
243: Now, one can easily get the surface number density of galaxies by
244: projecting $\Delta N_{\rm gal}(r)$ along the line-of-sight
245: ${\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}}$:
246: %11
247: \begin{equation}
248: n_{\rm gal}(M,z,{\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}})=
249: D_A^2(z)\int \Delta N_{\rm gal}(r) d\chi,
250: \end{equation}
251: in which $D_A(z)$ is the angular diameter distance to the halo.
252:
253:
254: \subsection{Power spectra}
255:
256: The angular cross power spectrum of the SZ-galaxy correlation can be
257: separated into the Poisson term $C_l^P$ and
258: the clustering term $C_l^C$:
259: %12
260: \begin{eqnarray}
261: C_l^P&=&g(x)
262: \int dz \frac{dV}{dzd\Omega} B(z,z_0) \nonumber\\
263: & & \int dM\frac{d^2N(M,z)}{dMdV}\vert y_l(M,z)n_l(M,z)\vert,
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: and
266: %13
267: \begin{eqnarray}
268: C_l^{C}&=& g(x)
269: \int dz\frac{dV}{dzd\Omega}P(l/D_0,z)B(z,z_0)\nonumber\\
270: & &\left[\int dM\frac{d^2N(M,z)}{dMdV}b(M,z)y_l(M,z)\right] \nonumber\\
271: & &\left[\int dM\frac{d^2N(M,z)}{dMdV}b(M,z)n_l\right],
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: where $D_0$ is the comoving angular diameter distance to the halo of
274: mass $M$ at $z$, and $y_l$ and $n_l$ are the Fourier
275: transforms of the Compton $y$-parameter and the surface
276: overdensity of galaxies $[n_{\rm gal}(M,z,{\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}})-
277: \overline{n}_{\rm gal}(z_0)]/\overline{n}_{\rm gal}(z_0)$,
278: respectively, $b(M,z)$ is the bias parameter, for which we use
279: the analytic prescription of Mo \& White (1996), and
280: the mean surface number density of galaxies
281: $\overline{n}_{\rm gal}(z_0)$ is given by
282: %14
283: \begin{equation}
284: \overline{n}_{\rm gal}(z_0)=\int \overline{N}_{\rm gal}(z)(1+z)^2
285: B(z,z_0) D_A^2(z) \frac{d\chi}{dz}dz,
286: \end{equation}
287: where and also in equations (12) and (13) $B(z,z_0)$ denotes the
288: redshift distribution function of galaxies. Here we use
289: the following approximate expression
290: (e.g. Baugh \& Efstathiou 1993; Dodelson et al. 2002):
291: %15
292: \begin{equation}
293: B(z,z_0)=\frac{3z^2}{2(z_0/1.412)^3}\;e^{-(1.412z/z_0)^{3/2}},
294: \end{equation}
295: in which $z_0$ is the median redshift of galaxy distribution in
296: galaxy survey.
297:
298:
299: Finally, we adopt the PS mass function for the comoving number density
300: of dark halos
301: %16
302: \begin{equation}
303: \frac{d^2N}{dMdV}=-\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} \frac{\bar{\rho}}{M}
304: \frac{\delta_{\rm c}(z)}{\sigma^2(M)}
305: \frac{d\sigma(M)}{dM}
306: \exp{\left(-\frac{\delta_c^2(z)}{2\sigma^2(M)} \right)},
307: \end{equation}
308: in which $\delta_c$ is the
309: linear over-density of perturbations that collapsed and virialized at
310: redshift $z$, and $\sigma(M)$ is the linear theory variance of the
311: mass density fluctuation in sphere of mass $M$:
312: %17
313: \begin{equation}
314: \sigma^2(M)=\frac{1}{2\pi^2}
315: \int_0^{\infty} k^2 P(k) {\vert W(kR)\vert}^2 dk,
316: \end{equation}
317: and $W(x)=3(\sin x-x\cos x)/x^3$
318: is the Fourier representation of the window function.
319: The power spectrum, $P(k)\propto k^{n_s}T^2(k)$, is normalized by
320: the rms fluctuation on an $8$ $h^{-1}$ Mpc scale, $\sigma_8$, and
321: we take the transfer function $T(k)$ from an adiabatic CDM model given
322: by Bardeen et al. (1986).
323: If we replace $n_l$ by $g(x)y_l$ and
324: set $B(z,z_0)=1$ in equations (12) and (13)
325: we can get the thermal SZ power spectrum, $C^{\rm SZ-SZ}_l$.
326: Instead, if $g(x)y_l$ is replaced by $n_l$, we will obtain
327: the galaxy-galaxy correlation, $C^{\rm gal-gal}_l$. Note that
328: for the later case the square of $|n_l|$ in equation (12) should
329: be $|n_l|$ if $\langle N_{\rm gal}(N_{\rm gal}-1)\rangle<1$ (Seljak 2000).
330:
331:
332:
333: \section{Application: prediction for the cross-correlation between
334: the MAP/Planck SZ maps and SDSS galaxy survey}
335:
336: First, we demonstrate in Figure 1 the expected power spectra of
337: auto-correlations of the SZ sky and galaxy survey and
338: their cross-correlation at frequency $\nu=30$ GHz and
339: for all galaxies ($B=1$).
340: Note that we have dropped the negative sign in $g(x)$.
341: Essentially, the SZ-SZ power spectrum is dominated by
342: Poisson distribution over all multipole range from
343: $l=100$ (e.g. Komatsu \& Kitayama 1999),
344: while clustering of the sources governs the galaxy-galaxy
345: correlation at angular scales up to $l\approx 5000$.
346: Overall, both of the SZ-SZ and SZ-galaxy power spectra
347: exhibit a decline at sufficiently large $l$, regardless of
348: the fact that the galaxy-galaxy correlation still has much
349: power at high $l$ beyond $l=10^4$.
350: The latter can be attributed to the pairs of galaxies
351: residing within the same, smaller halos at higher
352: redshifts which are included in the estimate of
353: galaxy-galaxy correlation because of the choice, $B=1$.
354: Extrapolation of the halo occupation number to high redshifts
355: may lead to an overestimate of galaxies in small halos.
356: Note that unlike the Compton $y$-parameter, the galaxy
357: surface number density $n_{\rm gal}(M,z,{\mbox{\boldmath $\theta$}})$
358: is proportional to $D_A^2(z)$ though both of them have the same
359: spatial dependence on the underlying dark matter distribution of
360: clusters. The strong power of the galaxy-galaxy correlation
361: at high $l$ can be significantly suppressed when we work with
362: a realistic redshift distribution function $B(z,z_0)$ based
363: on galaxy surveys such as SDSS (see below).
364:
365: %%%\placefigure{fig1}
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \psfig{figure=p1.ps,width=140mm,bbllx=60pt,bblly=200pt,bburx=800pt,bbury=730pt,clip=,angle=0}
369: \caption{The angular power spectra of the SZ-SZ (top panel),
370: galaxy-galaxy (middle panel) and SZ-galaxy (lower panel)
371: correlations at frequency $\nu=30$ GHz and for all galaxies.
372: Poisson and clustering components are explicitly displayed. }
373: \end{figure}
374:
375:
376: Next, following the investigation of Peiris \& Spergel (2000), we
377: carry out our numerical predictions for the galaxy sample
378: of SDSS and the SZ sky
379: (to be) revealed by WMAP/Planck surveyor. We study the feasibility of
380: extracting the redshift information of the SZ sky from
381: their angular cross power spectra. Toward this end,
382: we select the SDSS galaxies in different magnitude ranges
383: characterized by different values of median redshift $z_0$ in the
384: distribution function $B(z,z_0)$ (Dodelson et al. 2002).
385: We assume that all the galaxies have photometrically determined
386: redshifts to optimize the utilization of the SDSS data.
387: This yields a total of
388: $1.2\times10^{8}$ galaxies over a quarter of the sky
389: in the magnitude bin $20<r^*<21$.
390: We have also compared the angular power spectra of galaxies
391: $C_l^{\rm gal-gal}$ predicted by our halo model with those
392: determined by Tegmark et al. (2002) from
393: early SDSS data on scales $l<600$ in four different magnitude
394: ranges from $r^*=18$ to $22$, and found that the agreement
395: is good when the bias factors suggested by Tegmark et al. (2002)
396: are used in different magnitude bins [see Fig.2 of
397: Tegmark et al. (2002)].
398:
399:
400: The working frequencies of both WMAP and Planck are fixed at
401: $\nu\approx30$ GHz. Whether or not one is able to effectively
402: measure the SZ-SZ, galaxy-galaxy and SZ-galaxy power spectra
403: depends critically on the noise levels. Following the standard
404: treatment, we estimate the errors on the SZ-SZ power spectrum,
405: $C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ}$, and galaxy-galaxy power spectrum,
406: $C_l^{\rm gal-gal}$, through
407: %18,19
408: \begin{eqnarray}
409: \Delta C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ}&=&\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{(2l+1)\Delta l
410: f_{\rm sky}^{\rm SZ}}}C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ,tot};\\
411: \Delta C_l^{\rm gal-gal}&=&\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{(2l+1)\Delta l
412: f_{\rm sky}^{\rm gal}}}C_l^{\rm gal-gal,tot},
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: where $f_{\rm sky}^{\rm SZ}$ and $f_{\rm sky}^{\rm gal}$ are the
415: MAP/Planck and SDSS sky coverages, respectively,
416: and $\Delta l$ is the bin width
417: that will be fixed to be $l/4$ in our estimation
418: (see Zhang et al. 2002). $C_l^{\rm tot}$ denotes all contributions
419: to the measured power spectra that are essentially composed of
420: true signals and detector noise,
421: $C_l^{\rm tot}=C_l^{\rm true}+C_l^{\rm noise}$,
422: provided that foreground contamination is properly removed.
423: For the SDSS survey, the shot noise per mode is simply
424: %20
425: \begin{equation}
426: C_l^{\rm noise}=\frac{1}{n_{\rm gal}}.
427: \end{equation}
428: For the SZ sky observed by MAP/Planck,
429: the instrumental noise per mode can be modeled by
430: %21
431: \begin{equation}
432: C_l^{\rm noise}=w^{-1}(\nu) e^{\theta^2(\nu)l(l+1)},
433: \end{equation}
434: in which we have assumed that the experimental beam is Gaussian
435: with width $\theta^2(\nu)$ [FWHM$=(8\ln2)^{1/2}\theta(\nu)$],
436: and $w^{-1/2}$ denotes the noise level
437: in CMB temperature fluctuation per pixel. For our working frequency
438: of $\nu\approx30$ GHz, we choose these parameters in terms of the
439: tabulated values given by Cooray \& Hu (2000).
440: In a similar way, we can estimate the error for the SZ-galaxy
441: power spectrum from
442: %22
443: \begin{eqnarray}
444: \Delta C_l^{\rm SZ-gal}&=&\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{(2l+1)\Delta l f_{\rm sky}}}
445: \left[\left(C_l^{\rm SZ-gal}\right)^2 \right. \nonumber\\
446: & & +\left.C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ,tot}
447: C_l^{\rm gal-gal,tot}\right]^{1/2}.
448: \end{eqnarray}
449:
450:
451: We show in Figure 2 the expected power spectra of the
452: auto-correlations of the WMAP/Planck SZ maps and the SDSS galaxy survey
453: and their cross-correlations for $z_0=0.33$, corresponding to
454: $20<r^*<21$.
455: While in principle the galaxy power spectrum can be well constructed
456: with the SDSS survey over a broad range of multipoles,
457: the measurements of the SZ power spectra beyond $\l\sim$ a few hundreds
458: are hampered by the poor angular resolutions of the WMAP/Planck
459: experiments, although the result of Planck is slightly better
460: [see Bennett et al. (2003) for the first year WMAP result].
461: Recall that on the observed CMB spectrum the SZ signals appear
462: to be dominant only at $>2000$ unless the primary CMB can be
463: accurately removed. Consequently, it may become
464: hopeless to measure the cross-correlation between the WMAP/Planck SZ sky
465: and the SDSS galaxy survey. Yet, another possibility is to search for
466: the cross-correlation signals at very large angular scales generated
467: by superclusters (Hern\'andez-Monteagudo \& Rubin\~o-Mart\'in 2003)
468: or large-scale matter inhomogeneities at low redshifts (e.g. $z<0.1$)
469: (Afshordi, Loh \& Strauss 2004). Indeed, the noise appears to be relatively
470: smaller at low redshifts and large angular scales (see Figure 3),
471: which facilitates the detection of the cross-correlation of the
472: WMAP/Planck SZ maps with galaxy surveys such as SDSS and 2MASS,
473: although in this case our primary goal of extracting redshift
474: information of the SZ map from the cross-correlation signals
475: becomes less interesting.
476:
477:
478: %\placefigure{fig2}
479:
480: \begin{figure}
481: \psfig{figure=p2.ps,width=140mm,bbllx=60pt,bblly=200pt,bburx=800pt,bbury=730pt,clip=,angle=0}
482: \caption{Expected angular power spectra of the SZ-SZ (top panel),
483: the SDSS galaxy-galaxy (middle panel) and the SZ - SDSS galaxy
484: (lower panel) correlations at frequency $\nu=30$ GHz and
485: for $z_0=0.33$. Bin width is chosen as $\Delta l=l/4$. Left and right
486: panels correspond to the WMAP and Planck results, respectively.}
487: \end{figure}
488:
489:
490: Taking the Planck experiment as an example, we have shown in Figure 3
491: the SZ-galaxy cross-correlations for a set of median redshifts
492: of the SDSS galaxies. Despite the
493: large errors at high $l$ beyond $\sim400$, it demonstrates the actual
494: procedures that one needs to perform in order to extract the redshift
495: information of the SZ map from these cross-correlations.
496:
497:
498: %\placefigure{fig3}
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \psfig{figure=p3.ps,width=140mm,bbllx=60pt,bblly=200pt,bburx=800pt,bbury=730pt,clip=,angle=0}
502: \caption{Dependence of the Planck SZ-galaxy power spectra
503: on redshifts of the SDSS galaxies.}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506:
507: Finally, we calculate the correlation coefficient between
508: the SZ map and galaxy survey following
509: %23
510: \begin{equation}
511: r_{\rm corr}(l) = \frac{C_l^{\rm SZ-gal}}{\sqrt{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ}
512: C_l^{\rm gal-gal}}}.
513: \end{equation}
514: Recall that $r_{\rm corr}(l)$ acts as a quantitative
515: indicator of the significance
516: of the SZ-galaxy correlation. The associated error can be
517: estimated by
518: %24
519: \begin{eqnarray}
520: (\Delta r)^2&=& r_{\rm corr}^2(l)\left\{
521: \left(\frac{\Delta C_l^{\rm SZ-gal}}{ C_l^{\rm SZ-gal}}\right)^2
522: +\frac{1}{2(2l+1)f_{\rm sky}\Delta l} \right.\nonumber \\
523: & &\times\left(\frac{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ,tot}}{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ}}+
524: \frac{C_l^{\rm gal-gal,tot}}{C_l^{\rm gal-gal}}\right)\nonumber\\
525: & & \left[\frac{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ,tot}}{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ}}+
526: \frac{C_l^{\rm gal-gal,tot}}{C_l^{\rm gal-gal}} \right.
527: \nonumber\\
528: & & \left.\left.
529: -4\left(1+\frac{C_l^{\rm SZ-SZ,tot}C_l^{\rm gal-gal,tot}}
530: {(C_l^{\rm SZ-gal})^2}\right)^{1/2}\right]\right\}.
531: \end{eqnarray}
532: We display in Figure 4 the resulting correlation coefficients
533: in the same redshift ranges as in Figure 3 for the Planck SZ-SDSS galaxy
534: correlation. Similarly to the power spectra in Fig.3, instrumental
535: noise becomes to be dominant at both lower and higher $l$ for the
536: correlation coefficients. Peak location of $r_{\rm corr}$ increases
537: with the median redshift of SDSS galaxy distribution because
538: inclusion of more distant galaxies in the estimate
539: of the SZ-galaxy correlation raises the power at smaller angular scales.
540: Overall, the correlation efficient has a value of
541: $r_{\rm corr}\approx0.2$ at $100<l<1000$, indicating that
542: the two phenomena are only moderately correlated with each other.
543: This arises from the fact that only can galaxies in clusters contribute
544: to the SZ-galaxy correlation and field galaxies selected in SDSS
545: sample have almost no effect on the cross correlation between the SZ map
546: and galaxy survey.
547: Zhang \& Pen (2001) made a similar analysis to maximize
548: $r_{\rm corr}$ by properly picking the redshift distribution
549: function of the SDSS galaxies, which can increase the correlation
550: efficient to
551: $r_{\rm corr}^{\rm max}\approx0.7$ at a smaller scale of $10^3<l<10^4$.
552:
553: %\placefigure{fig5}
554:
555: \begin{figure}
556: \psfig{figure=p4.ps,width=140mm,bbllx=60pt,bblly=200pt,bburx=800pt,bbury=730pt,clip=,angle=0}
557: \caption{The correlation coefficients for the Planck SZ map
558: and SDSS galaxy survey in different redshift ranges. Bin width is
559: taken to be $\Delta l=l/4$.}
560: \end{figure}
561:
562:
563:
564: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
565:
566: Cross-correlation between the SZ map and galaxy survey
567: will reveal, in a statistical manner, important information
568: on the redshift distribution of hot baryons in the universe,
569: which requires no spectroscopic follow-up observation of
570: individual sources. Recall that the major advantage of
571: measurement of the SZ power spectrum over the SZ cluster survey
572: is that one can acquire weak SZ signals at high statistical
573: significance level without the need for resolving individual clusters.
574: Indeed, time-consuming spectroscopic follow-up observations
575: of the SZ sources may eventually throw a shadow
576: on the effective applications of the
577: SZ power spectrum if redshift distribution is ultimately
578: concerned. Cross-correlation between the SZ map and
579: galaxy survey provides a simple approach which is just
580: suited for the problem. In particular, theoretical prediction of
581: the SZ-galaxy power spectrum can be greatly simplified if
582: one notices that the signals of the SZ-galaxy cross-correlation
583: are primarily produced by the hot gas and galaxies within the same
584: clusters. Namely, field galaxies make almost no contribution to
585: the SZ-galaxy cross-correlation.
586:
587: Assuming that both the intracluster gas and cluster galaxies follow
588: the same dark matter distribution with a functional form of the NFW-like
589: profile and the abundance of dark halos is described by the PS mass
590: function, we have predicted the SZ-galaxy angular power spectrum.
591: As it is expected, the power spectrum indeed shows a moderately
592: strong correlation indicated by an overall correlation coefficient
593: of $r_{\rm corr}\approx 0.2$ at $100<1<1000$.
594: However, applying our algorithm to
595: the SDSS galaxy survey and MAP/Planck SZ maps yields an unpleasant
596: result: It is unlikely that one can acquire meaningful information
597: about the redshift distribution of the MAP/Planck SZ maps because
598: the SZ signals are significantly below the noise levels
599: in our interested range of multipoles, $l>1000$,
600: although the SDSS galaxy sample
601: should be just suited for such a purpose.
602: One possibility is to work at large angular scales $l<100$, which
603: is related to the SZ effect produced by nearby superclusters and
604: clustering of galaxies (Hern\'andez-Monteagudo \& Rubin\~o-Mart\'in 2003;
605: Afshordi et al. 2004). Another application
606: is to utilize the CMB data at very small angular scales beyond $l=2000$
607: to be obtained by many ongoing/upcoming experiments such as ACBAR,
608: AMiBA, BIMA, CBI, etc. In this case, one needs instead to deal with
609: the small-sky coverage problem. Indeed, a similar work should be done
610: on the feasibility of cross-correlating these small-sky
611: coverage CMB data with existing galaxy catalogs. We conclude that
612: the cross-correlation between the SZ map and galaxy survey
613: can in principle yield valuable information about the redshift
614: distribution of the host baryons in the universe. However,
615: the actual applications of this technique to real observations may
616: not be possible until high angular resolution and sensitivity
617: SZ power spectrum over a wide sky coverage is achieved.
618:
619:
620:
621: \begin{acknowledgements}
622: Constructive suggestions by an anonymous referee are gratefully acknowledged.
623: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China,
624: under Grant No. 10233040, and the Ministry of Science and Technology
625: of China, under Grant No. NKBRSF G19990754.
626: \end{acknowledgements}
627:
628: \begin{thebibliography}{}
629:
630: \bibitem{}Afshordi, N., Loh, Y.-S., \* Strauss, M.~A.\ 2004, PRD, in press
631: (astro-ph/0308260)
632: \bibitem{}Babul, A., Balogh, M.~L., Lewis, G.~F., \& Poole, G.~B.\ 2002,
633: MNRAS, 330, 329
634: \bibitem{}Bardeen, J.~M., Bond, J.~R., Kaiser, N., \& Szalay, A.~S.\
635: 1986, ApJ, 304, 15
636: \bibitem{}Baugh, C.~M., \& Efstathiou, G.\ 1993, MNRAS, 265, 145
637: \bibitem{}Bennett, C.~L., et al.\ 2003, ApJS, 148, 1,
638: \bibitem{}Bryan, G.~L., \& Norman, M.~L.\ 1998, ApJ, 495, 80
639: \bibitem{}Bullock, J.~S., et al.\ 2001, MNRAS, 321, 559
640: \bibitem{}Bond, J.~R., et al.\ 2003, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0205386)
641: \bibitem{}Carlstrom, J.~E.\ 2002, ARAA, 40, 643
642: \bibitem{}Cen, R., \& Ostriker, J.~P.\ 1999, ApJ, 514, 1
643: \bibitem{}Cooray, A., \& Hu, W.\ 2000, ApJ, 534, 533
644: \bibitem{}Cooray, A., \& Sheth, R.\ 2003, Phys. Rep., 372, 1
645: \bibitem{}Dav\'e, R., et al.\ 2001, ApJ, 552, 473
646: \bibitem{}Dodelson, S., et al.\ 2002, ApJ, 572, 140
647: \bibitem{}Hern\'andez-Monteagudo, C., \& Rubi\~no-Mart\'in, J.~A.\
648: 2003, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/0305606)
649: \bibitem{}Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J.~M., Diaferio, A., \& White, S.~D.~M.\
650: 1999, MNRAS, 303, 188
651: \bibitem{}Komatsu, \& Kitayama \ 1999, ApJ, 526, L1
652: \bibitem{}Komatsu, \& Seljak \ 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1256
653: \bibitem{}Mason, B.~S., et al.\ 2003, ApJ, 591, 540
654: \bibitem{}Mo, H.-J., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1996, MNRAS, 282, 347
655: \bibitem{}Navarro, J.~F., Frenk, C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1995,
656: MNRAS, 275, 720
657: \bibitem{}Peiris, H.~V., \& Spergel, D.~N.\ 2000, ApJ, 540, 605
658: \bibitem{}Press, W.~H., \& Schechter, P.\ 1974, ApJ, 187, 425
659: \bibitem{}Seljak, U.\ 2000, MNRAS, 318, 203
660: \bibitem{}Seljak, U., Burwell, J., \& Pen, U.-L.\ 2000,
661: Phys. Rev. D, 63, 063001
662: \bibitem{}Sheth, R.~K., \& Diaferio, A.\ 2001, MNRAS, 322, 901
663: \bibitem{}Tegmark, M.~,~et al.\ 2002, ApJ, 571, 191
664: \bibitem{}Voit, G.~M., Bryan, G.~L., Balogh, M.~L., \& Bower, R.~G.\
665: 2002, ApJ, 576, 601
666: \bibitem{}Wu, X.-P, \& Xue, Y.-J.\ 2002, ApJ, 569, 112
667: \bibitem{}Wu, X.-P, \& Xue, Y.-J.\ 2003, ApJ, 590, 8
668: \bibitem{}Zhang, P.-J., \& Pen, U.-L.\ 2001, ApJ, 549, 18
669: \bibitem{}Zhang, P.-J., \& Pen, U.-L.\ 2003, ApJ, 588, 704
670: \bibitem{}Zhang, P.-J., Pen, U.-L., \& Wang, B.\ 2002, ApJ, 577, 568
671:
672: \end{thebibliography}
673:
674: \end{document}
675:
676:
677: